Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The St. Petersburg Paradox" by Robert Martin

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Works Cited

  • Bernoulli, Daniel, 1954 [1738], “Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk”, Econometrica, 22: 23–36. (Scholar)
  • Clark, Michael, 2002, “The St. Petersburg Paradox”, in Paradoxes from A to Z, London: Routledge, pp. 174–177. (Scholar)
  • Döring, Sabine and Fretz Feger, 2010, “Risk Assessment as Virtue”, in Emotions and Risky Technologies (The International Library of Law and Technology 5), Sabine Röser, ed, New York: Springer, 91–105. (Scholar)
  • Gustason, William, 1994, Reasoning from Evidence, New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company. (Scholar)
  • Hacking, Ian, 1980, “Strange Expectations”, Philosophy of Science, 47: 562–567. (Scholar)
  • Hardin, Russell, 1982, Collective Action, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
  • Jeffrey, Richard C., 1983, The Logic of Decision, Second Edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Menger, Karl, 1967 [1934], “The Role of Uncertainty in Economics”, in Essays in Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern (ed. Martin Shubik), Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Nathan, Amos, 1984, “False Expectations”, Philosophy of Science, 51: 128–136. (Scholar)
  • Resnik, Michael D., 1987, Choices: An Introduction to Decision Theory, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
  • Weirich, Paul, 1984, “The St. Petersburg Gamble and Risk”, Theory and Decision, 17: 193–202. (Scholar)

Other Discussions

  • Arntzenius, Frank, Adam Elga, and John Hawthorne, 2004, “Bayesianism, Infinite Decisions, and Binding,” Mind, 113: 251–283 (Scholar)
  • Ball, W. W. R. and H. S. M. Coxeter., 1987, Mathematical Recreations and Essays, 13th ed., New York: Dover. (Scholar)
  • Bernstein, Peter, 1996, Against The Gods: the Remarkable Story of Risk, New York: John Wiley & Sons. (Scholar)
  • Cowen, Tyler and Jack High, 1988, “Time, Bounded Utility, and the St Petersburg Paradox”, Theory and Decision: An International Journal for Methods and Models in the Social and Decision Sciences, 25: 219–223. (Scholar)
  • Gardner, Martin, 1959, The Scientific American Book of Mathematical Puzzles & Diversions. New York: Simon and Schuster. (Scholar)
  • Kamke, E, 1932, Einführung in die Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie. Leipzig: S. Hirzel. (Scholar)
  • Keynes, J. M. K., 1988, “The Application of Probability to Conduct”, in The World of Mathematics, Vol. 2 (K. Newman, ed.), Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press. (Scholar)
  • Kraitchik, M., 1942, “The Saint Petersburg Paradox”, in Mathematical Recreations. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 138–139. (Scholar)
  • Todhunter, I., 1949 [1865], A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability, New York: Chelsea. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Mar 26 09:54:37 2017