Principal Works

• Ackermann, R., 1985. Data, Instruments and Theory, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991. “Allan Franklin, Right or Wrong”, PSA 1990 (Volume 2), A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (ed.). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 451–457. (Scholar)
• Adelberger, E.G., 1989. “High-Sensitivity Hillside Results from the Eot-Wash Experiment”, Tests of Fundamental Laws in Physics: Ninth Moriond Workshop, O. Fackler and J. Tran Thanh Van (ed.). Les Arcs, France: Editions Frontieres, 485–499. (Scholar)
• Anderson, M.H., J.R. Ensher, M.R. Matthews, et al., 1995. “Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor”. Science, 269: 198–201. (Scholar)
• Bell, J.S. and J. Perring, 1964. “2pi Decay of the K₂o Meson”, Physical Review Letters, 13: 348–349. (Scholar)
• Bennett, W.R., 1989. “Modulated-Source Eotvos Experiment at Little Goose Lock”, Physical Review Letters, 62: 365–368. (Scholar)
• Bizzeti, P.G., A.M. Bizzeti-Sona, T. Fazzini, et al., 1989a. “Search for a Composition Dependent Fifth Force: Results of the Vallambrosa Experiment”, Tran Thanh Van, J., O. Fackler (ed.). Gif Sur Yvette: Editions Frontieres. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989b. “Search for a Composition-dependent Fifth Force”, Physical Review Letters, 62: 2901–2904. (Scholar)
• Bogen, J. and Woodward J., 1988. “Saving the Phenomena”, The Philosophical Review, 97: 303–352. (Scholar)
• Bose, S., 1924. “Plancks Gesetz und Lichtquantenhypothese”. Zeitschrift für Physik, 26: 178–181. (Scholar)
• Burnett, K., 1995. “An Intimate Gathering of Bosons”. Science, 269: 182–183. (Scholar)
• Cartwright, N., 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Chang, H., 2004. Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Chang, H., 2007. "Scientific Progress: Beyond Foundationalism and Coherentism", Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 61: 1–20. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. “The philosophical grammar of scientific practice”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25: 205–221. (Scholar)
• Chase, C., 1929. “A Test for Polarization in a beam of Electrons by Scattering”, Physical Review, 34: 1069–1074. (Scholar)
• –––, 1930. “The Scattering of Fast Electrons by Metals. II. Polarization by Double Scattering at Right Angles”, Physical Review, 36: 1060–1065. (Scholar)
• Christenson, J.H., J.W. Cronin, V.L. Fitch, et al., 1964. “Evidence for the 2pi Decay of the \(\ce{K2^0}\) Meson”, Physical Review Letters, 13: 138–140. (Scholar)
• Collins, H., 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, London: Sage Publications. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994. “A Strong Confirmation of the Experimenters’ Regress”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 25(3): 493–503. (Scholar)
• Collins, H. and Pinch, T., 1993. The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Conan Doyle, A., 1967. “The Sign of Four”, The Annotated Sherlock Holmes, W. S. Barrington-Gould (ed.). New York: Clarkson N. Potter. (Scholar)
• Cowsik, R., N. Krishnan, S.N. Tandor, et al., 1988. “Limit on the Strength of Intermediate-Range Forces Coupling to Isospin”. Physical Review Letters, 61: 2179–2181. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990. “Strength of Intermediate-Range Forces Coupling to Isospin”, Physical Review Letters, 64: 336–339. (Scholar)
• Daston, L., 2011. “The empire of observation”, in Histories of scientific observation, L. Daston and E. Lunbeck (eds.), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 81–113. (Scholar)
• Daston, L., and Galison, P., 2007. Objectivity, New York: Zone Books. (Scholar)
• Daston, L., and Lunbeck, E., 2011. Introduction, Histories of scientific observation, L. Daston and E. Lunbeck (eds.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1–9. (Scholar)
• Dawid, R., 2015. “Higgs Discovery and the Look-elsewhere Effect.” Philosophy of Science, 82(1): 76–96. (Scholar)
• de Groot, S.R. and H.A. Tolhoek, 1950. “On the Theory of Beta-Radioactivity I: The Use of Linear Combinations of Invariants in the Interaction Hamiltonian”, Physica, 16: 456–480. (Scholar)
• Delbruck, M. and G. S. Stent, 1957. On the Mechanism of DNA Replication. The Chemical Basis of Heredity. W. D. McElroy and B. Glass. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press: 699–736. (Scholar)
• Dymond, E.G., 1931. “Polarisation of a Beam of Electrons by Scattering”, Nature, 128: 149. (Scholar)
• –––, 1932. “On the Polarisation of Electrons by Scattering”, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), A136: 638–651. (Scholar)
• –––, 1934. “On the Polarization of Electrons by Scattering. II.”, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), A145: 657–668. (Scholar)
• Einstein, A., 1924. “Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases”, Sitzungsberischte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 261–267. (Scholar)
• –––, 1925. “Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen gases”, Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akadmie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 3–14. (Scholar)
• Everett, A.E., 1965. “Evidence on the Existence of Shadow Pions in K⁺ Decay”, Physical Review Letters, 14: 615–616. (Scholar)
• Fermi, E., 1934. “Attempt at a Theory of Beta-Rays”, Il Nuovo Cimento, 11: 1–21. (Scholar)
• Feynman, R.P. and M. Gell-Mann, 1958. “Theory of the Fermi Interaction”, Physical Review, 109: 193–198. (Scholar)
• Feynman, R.P., R.B. Leighton and M. Sands, 1963. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. (Scholar)
• Fierz, M., 1937. “Zur Fermischen Theorie des -Zerfalls”. Zeitschrift für Physik, 104: 553–565. (Scholar)
• Fischbach, E., S. Aronson, C. Talmadge, et al., 1986. “Reanalysis of the Eötvös Experiment”, Physical Review Letters, 56: 3–6. (Scholar)
• Fitch, V.L., 1981. “The Discovery of Charge-Conjugation Parity Asymmetry”, Science, 212: 989–993. (Scholar)
• Fitch, V.L., M.V. Isaila and M.A. Palmer, 1988. “Limits on the Existence of a Material-dependent Intermediate-Range Force”. Physical Review Letters, 60: 1801–1804. (Scholar)
• Ford, E. B., 1937. “Problems of Heredity in the Lepidoptera.” Biological Reviews, 12: 461–503. (Scholar)
• –––, 1940. “Genetic Research on the Lepidoptera.” Annals of Eugenics, 10: 227–252. (Scholar)
• Ford, K.W., 1968. Basic Physics, Lexington: Xerox. (Scholar)
• Franklin, A., 1986. The Neglect of Experiment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990. Experiment, Right or Wrong, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993a. The Rise and Fall of the Fifth Force: Discovery, Pursuit, and Justification in Modern Physics, New York: American Institute of Physics. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993b. “Discovery, Pursuit, and Justification.” Perspectives on Science, 1: 252–284. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994. “How to Avoid the Experimenters’ Regress”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25: 97–121. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995. “Laws and Experiment”, Laws of Nature, F. Weinert (ed.). Berlin, De Gruyter:191–207. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997a. “Calibration”, Perspectives on Science, 5: 31–80. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997b. “Recycling Expertise and Instrumental Loyalty”, Philosophy of Science (Supplement), 64(4): S42–S52. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002. Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013. Shifting Standards: Experiments in Particle Physics in the Twentieth Century, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
• Franklin, A. and C. Howson, 1984. “Why Do Scientists Prefer to Vary Their Experiments?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 15: 51–62. (Scholar)
• Franklin, A., et al., 1989. “Can a theory-laden observation test the theory?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40(2): 229–231. (Scholar)
• Friedman, J.L. and V.L. Telegdi, 1957. “Nuclear Emulsion Evidence for Parity Nonconservation in the Decay Chain \(pi^+ -- \mu^+ -- e^+\)”, Physical Review, 105(5): 1681–1682. (Scholar)
• Galison, P., 1987. How Experiments End, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997. Image and Logic, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Gamow, G. and E. Teller, 1936. “Selection Rules for the -Disintegration”, Physical Review, 49: 895–899. (Scholar)
• Garwin, R.L., L.M. Lederman and M. Weinrich, 1957. “Observation of the Failure of Conservation of Parity and Charge Conjugation in Meson Decays: The Magnetic Moment of the Free Muon”, Physical Review 105: 1415–1417. (Scholar)
• Gerlach, W. and O. Stern, 1922a. “Der experimentelle Nachweis der Richtungsquantelung”, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 9: 349–352. (Scholar)
• –––, 1924. “Uber die Richtungsquantelung im Magnetfeld”, Annalen der Physik, 74: 673–699. (Scholar)
• Glashow, S., 1992. “The Death of Science?” The End of Science? Attack and Defense, R.J. Elvee. Lanham, MD.: University Press of America (Scholar)
• Gooding, D., 1992. “Putting Agency Back Into Experiment”, in Science as Practice and Culture, A. Pickering (ed.). Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 65–112. (Scholar)
• Hacking, I., 1981. “Do We See Through a Microscope”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 63: 305–322. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983. Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989. “Extragalactic reality: The case of gravitational lensing”, Philosophy of Science, 56: 555–581. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992. “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences”, Science as Practice and Culture, A. Pickering (ed.). Chicago, University of Chicago Press:29–64. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Halpern, O. and J. Schwinger, 1935. “On the Polarization of Electrons by Double Scattering”, Physical Review, 48: 109–110. (Scholar)
• Hamilton, D.R., 1947. “Electron-Neutrino Angular Correlation in Beta-Decay”, Physical Review, 71: 456–457. (Scholar)
• Hellmann, H., 1935. “Bemerkung zur Polarisierung von Elektronenwellen durch Streuung”, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 96: 247–250. (Scholar)
• Hermannsfeldt, W.B., R.L. Burman, P. Stahelin, et al., 1958. “Determination of the Gamow-Teller Beta-Decay Interaction from the Decay of Helium-6”, Physical Review Letters, 1: 61–63. (Scholar)
• Holmes, F. L., 2001. Meselson, Stahl, and the Replication of DNA, A History of “The Most Beautiful Experiment in Biology”, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
• Karaca, K., 2011. “Progress Report 2 – Project: The Epistemology of the LHC.” Franklin A. Wuppertal, DE. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013. “The strong and weak senses of theory-ladenness of experimentation: Theory-driven versus exploratory experiments in the history of high-energy particle physics”. Science in Context, 26(1): 93–136. (Scholar)
• Kettlewell, H. B. D., 1955. “Selection Experiments on Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera.” Heredity, 9: 323–342. (Scholar)
• –––, 1956. “Further Selection Experiments on Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera.” Heredity 10: 287–301. (Scholar)
• –––, 1958. “A Survey of the Frequencies of Biston betularia (L.) (Lep.) and its Melanic Forms in Great Britain.” Heredity, 12: 51–72. (Scholar)
• Kofoed-Hansen, O., 1955. “Neutrino Recoil Experiments”, Beta- and Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy, K. Siegbahn (ed.). New York, Interscience:357–372. (Scholar)
• Konopinski, E. and G. Uhlenbeck, 1935. “On the Fermi Theory of Radioactivity”, Physical Review, 48: 7–12. (Scholar)
• Konopinski, E.J. and L.M. Langer, 1953. “The Experimental Clarification of the Theory of –Decay”, Annual Reviews of Nuclear Science, 2: 261–304. (Scholar)
• Konopinski, E.J. and G.E. Uhlenbeck, 1941. “On the Theory of Beta-Radioactivity”, Physical Review, 60: 308–320. (Scholar)
• Langer, L.M., J.W. Motz and H.C. Price, 1950. “Low Energy Beta-Ray Spectra: Pm¹⁴⁷ S³⁵”, Physical Review, 77: 798–805. (Scholar)
• Langer, L.M. and H.C. Price, 1949. “Shape of the Beta-Spectrum of the Forbidden Transition of Yttrium 91”, Physical Review, 75: 1109. (Scholar)
• Langstroth, G.O., 1932. “Electron Polarisation”, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), A136: 558–568. (Scholar)
• LaRue, G.S., J.D. Phillips, and W.M. Fairbank, DATE. “Observation of Fractional Charge of (1/3)e on Matter”, Physical Review Letters, 46: 967–970. (Scholar)
• Latour, B. and S. Woolgar, 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Beverly Hills: Sage. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Lee, T.D. and C.N. Yang, 1956. “Question of Parity Nonconservation in Weak Interactions”, Physical Review, 104: 254–258. (Scholar)
• Lehninger, A. L., 1975. Biochemistry, New York: Worth Publishers. (Scholar)
• Lynch, M., 1991. “Allan Franklin’s Transcendental Physics.” PSA 1990, Volume 2, A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 2: 471–485. (Scholar)
• MacKenzie, D., 1989. “From Kwajelein to Armageddon? Testing and the Social Construction of Missile Accuracy”, The Uses of Experiment, D. Gooding, T. Pinch and S. Shaffer (ed.). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 409–435. (Scholar)
• Malik, S., 2017. “ Observation Versus Experiment: An Adequate Framework for Analysing Scientific Experimentation? ”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 48: 71–95. (Scholar)
• Mayer, M.G., S.A. Moszkowski and L.W. Nordheim, 1951. “Nuclear Shell Structure and Beta Decay. I. Odd A Nuclei”, Reviews of Modern Physics, 23: 315–321. (Scholar)
• McKinney, W., 1992. Plausibility and Experiment: Investigations in the Context of Pursuit. History and Philosophy of Science. Bloomington, IN, Indiana. (Scholar)
• Mehra, J. and H. Rechenberg, 1982. The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, New York: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
• Meselson, M. and F. W. Stahl, 1958. “The Replication of DNA in Escherichia Coli.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.), 44: 671–682. (Scholar)
• Millikan, R.A., 1911. “The Isolation of an Ion, A Precision Measurement of Its Charge, and the Correction of Stokes’s Law”. Physical Review, 32: 349–397. (Scholar)
• Morrison, M., 1990. “Theory, Intervention, and Realism”. Synthese, 82: 1–22. (Scholar)
• Mott, N.F., 1929. “Scattering of Fast Electrons by Atomic Nuclei”, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), A124: 425–442. (Scholar)
• –––, 1931. “Polarization of a Beam of Electrons by Scattering”, Nature, 128(3228): 454. (Scholar)
• Nelson, A., 1994. “How Could Scientific Facts be Socially Constructed?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 25(4): 535–547. (Scholar) (Scholar) (Scholar)
• –––, 1932. “Tha Polarisation of Electrons by Double Scattering”, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), A135: 429–458. (Scholar)
• Nelson, P.G., D.M. Graham and R.D. Newman, 1990. “Search for an Intermediate-Range Composition-dependent Force Coupling to N-Z”. Physical Review D, 42: 963–976. (Scholar)
• Nelson, A., 1994. “How Could Scientific Facts be Socially Constructed?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 25(4): 535–547. (Scholar) (Scholar)
• Newman, R., D. Graham and P. Nelson, 1989. “A ”Fifth Force“ Search for Differential Acceleration of Lead and Copper toward Lead”, in Tests of Fundamental Laws in Physics: Ninth Moriond Workshop, O. Fackler and J. Tran Thanh Van (ed.), Les Arcs: Editions Frontieres, 459–472.
• Nishijima, K. and M.J. Saffouri, 1965. “CP Invariance and the Shadow Universe”, Physical Review Letters, 14: 205–207. (Scholar)
• Pais, A., 1982. Subtle is the Lord…, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Panofsky, W., 1994. Particles and Policy (Masters of Modern Physics), New York: American Institute of Physics. (Scholar)
• Parker, W., 2008. “Franklin, Holmes, and the Epistmology of Computer Simulation.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22: 165–183. (Scholar)
• Pauli, W., 1933. “Die Allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik”, Handbuch der Physik, 24: 83–272. (Scholar)
• Perovic, S., 2006. “Schrödinger’s interpretation of quantum mechanics and the relevance of Bohr’s experimental critique”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B (Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 37 (2): 275–297. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. “Missing experimental challenges to the Standard Model of particle physics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B (Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 42 (1): 32–42. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013. “Emergence of complementarity and the Baconian roots of Niels Bohr’s method”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B (Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 44 (3): 162–173. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017. “Experimenter’s regress argument, empiricism, and the calibration of the large hadron collider”, Synthese, 194: 313–332. (Scholar)
• Petschek, A.G. and R.E. Marshak, 1952. “The \(\beta\)-Decay of Radium E and the Pseusoscalar Interaction”, Physical Review, 85(4): 698–699. (Scholar)
• Pickering, A., 1981. “The Hunting of the Quark”, Isis, 72: 216–236. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984a. Constructing Quarks, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984b. “Against Putting the Phenomena First: The Discovery of the Weak Neutral Current”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 15: 85–117. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987. “Against Correspondence: A Constructivist View of Experiment and the Real”, PSA 1986, A. Fine and P. Machamer (ed.). Pittsburgh, Philosophy of Science Association. 2: 196–206. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989. “Living in the Material World: On Realism and Experimental Practice”, in The Uses of Experiment, D. Gooding, T. Pinch and S. Schaffer (eds.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 275–297. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991. “Reason Enough? More on Parity Violation Experiments and Electroweak Gauge Theory”, in PSA 1990 (Volume 2), A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels (eds.), East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 2: 459–469. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995. The Mangle of Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar) (Scholar)
• Prentki, J., 1965. CP Violation, in Proceedings: Oxford International Conference on Elementary Particles (Oxford, UK, Sept 19–25, 1965), R.G. Moorhouse, A.E. Taylor, and T.R. Walsh (eds.), 47–58. (Scholar)
• Pursey, D.L., 1951. “The Interaction in the Theory of Beta Decay”, Philosophical Magazine, 42: 1193–1208. (Scholar)
• Raab, F.J., 1987. “Search for an Intermediate-Range Interaction: Results of the Eot-Wash I Experiment”, New and Exotic Phenomena: Seventh Moriond Workshop, O. Fackler and J. Tran Thanh Van (eds.), Les Arcs: Editions Frontieres: 567–577. (Scholar)
• Randall, H.M., R.G. Fowler, N. Fuson, et al., 1949. Infrared Determination of Organic Structures, New York: Van Nostrand. (Scholar)
• Richter, H., 1937. “Zweimalige Streuung schneller Elektronen”. Annalen der Physik, 28: 533–554. (Scholar)
• Ridley, B.W., 1954. Nuclear Recoil in Beta Decay. Physics, Ph. D. Dissertation, Cambridge University. (Scholar)
• Rose, M.E. and H.A. Bethe, 1939. “On the Absence of Polarization in Electron Scattering”, Physical Review, 55: 277–289. (Scholar)
• Rudge, D. W., 1998. “A Bayesian Analysis of Strategies in Evolutionary Biology.” Perspectives on Science, 6: 341–360. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001. “Kettlewell from an Error Statistician’s Point of View”, Perspectives on Science, 9: 59–77. (Scholar)
• Rupp, E., 1929. “Versuche zur Frage nach einer Polarisation der Elektronenwelle”, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 53: 548–552. (Scholar)
• –––, 1930a. “Ueber eine unsymmetrische Winkelverteilung zweifach reflektierter Elektronen”, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 61: 158–169. (Scholar)
• –––, 1930b. “Ueber eine unsymmetrische Winkelverteilung zweifach reflektierter Elektronen”, Naturwissenschaften, 18: 207. (Scholar)
• –––, 1931. “Direkte Photographie der Ionisierung in Isolierstoffen”, Naturwissenschaften, 19: 109. (Scholar)
• –––, 1932a. “Versuche zum Nachweis einer Polarisation der Elektronen”, Physickalsche Zeitschrift, 33: 158–164. (Scholar)
• –––, 1932b. “Neure Versuche zur Polarisation der Elektronen”, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 33: 937–940. (Scholar)
• –––, 1932c. “Ueber die Polarisation der Elektronen bei zweimaliger 90^o–Streuung”, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 79: 642–654. (Scholar)
• –––, 1934. “Polarisation der Elektronen an freien Atomen”, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 88: 242–246. (Scholar)
• Rustad, B.M. and S.L. Ruby, 1953. “Correlation between Electron and Recoil Nucleus in He⁶ Decay”, Physical Review, 89: 880–881. (Scholar)
• –––, 1955. “Gamow-Teller Interaction in the Decay of He⁶”, Physical Review, 97: 991–1002. (Scholar)
• Sargent, B.W., 1932. “Energy Distribution Curves of the Disintegration Electrons”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 24: 538–553. (Scholar)
• –––, 1933. “The Maximum Energy of the -Rays from Uranium X and other Bodies”, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), A139: 659–673. (Scholar)
• Sauter, F., 1933. “Ueber den Mottschen Polarisationseffekt bei der Streuun von Elektronen an Atomen”, Annalen der Physik, 18: 61–80. (Scholar)
• Shapin, S. and Simon S., 1989. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Schindler, S., 2011. “Bogen and Woodward’s data-phenomena distinction, forms of theory-ladenness, and the reliability of data ”, Synthese, 182(1): 39–55. (Scholar)
• Sellars, W., 1962. Science, Perception, and Reality, New York: Humanities Press. (Scholar)
• Sherr, R. and J. Gerhart, 1952. “Gamma Radiation of C¹⁰”. Physical Review, 86: 619. (Scholar)
• Sherr, R., H.R. Muether and M.G. White, 1949. “Radioactivity of C¹⁰ and O¹⁴”, Physical Review, 75: 282–292. (Scholar)
• Smith, A.M., 1951. “Forbidden Beta-Ray Spectra”, Physical Review, 82: 955–956. (Scholar)
• Staley, K., 1999 “Golden Events and Statistics: What’s Wrong with Galison’s Image/Logic Distinction.” Perspectives on Science, 7: 196–230. (Scholar)
• Stern, O., 1921. “Ein Weg zur experimentellen Prufung Richtungsquantelung im Magnet feld”, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 7: 249–253. (Scholar)
• Stubbs, C.W., E.G. Adelberger, B.R. Heckel, et al., 1989. “Limits on Composition-dependent Interactions using a Laboratory Source: Is There a ”Fifth Force?“”, Physical Review Letters, 62: 609–612. (Scholar)
• Stubbs, C.W., E.G. Adelberger, F.J. Raab, et al., 1987. “Search for an Intermediate-Range Interaction”, Physical Review Letters, 58: 1070–1073. (Scholar)
• Sudarshan, E.C.G. and R.E. Marshak, 1958. “Chirality Invariance and the Universal Fermi Interaction”, Physical Review, 109: 1860–1862. (Scholar)
• Tal, E., 2016. “Making time: A study in the epistemology of measurement”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(1): 297–335. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017a. “A model-based epistemology of measurement”, in Nicola Mößner and Alfred Nordmann (eds.), Reasoning in measurement, Routledge: 245–265.
• –––, 2017b. “Calibration: Modelling the measurement process”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 65: 33–45. (Scholar)
• Thieberger, P., 1987a. “Search for a Substance-Dependent Force with a New Differential Accelerometer”, Physical Review Letters, 58: 1066–1069. (Scholar)
• Thomson, G.P., 1933. “Polarisation of Electrons”, Nature, 132: 1006. (Scholar)
• –––, 1934. “Experiment on the Polarization of Electrons”, Philosophical Magazine, 17: 1058–1071. (Scholar)
• Thomson, J.J., 1897. “Cathode Rays”, Philosophical Magazine, 44: 293–316. (Scholar)
• Uhlenbeck, G.E. and S. Goudsmit, 1925. “Ersetzung der Hypothese von unmechanischen Zwang durch eine Forderung bezuglich des inneren Verhaltens jedes einzelnen Elektrons”, Naturwissenschaften, 13: 953–954. (Scholar)
• –––, 1926. “Spinning Electrons and the Structure of Spectra”, Nature, 117: 264–265. (Scholar)
• van Fraassen, B., 1980. The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Watson, J. D., 1965. Molecular Biology of the Gene, New York: W.A. Benjamin, Inc. (Scholar)
• Watson, J. D. and F. H. C. Crick, 1953a. “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid”, Nature, 171: 737. (Scholar)
• –––, 1953b. “Genetical Implications of the Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid”, Nature, 171: 964–967. (Scholar)
• Weinert, F., 1995. “Wrong Theory—Right Experiment: The Significance of the Stern-Gerlach Experiments”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 26B(1): 75–86. (Scholar)
• Winter, J., 1936. “Sur la polarisation des ondes de Dirac”, Academie des Science, Paris, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des seances, 202: 1265–1266. (Scholar)
• Winsberg, E., 2010. Science in the Age of Computer Simulation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Wu, C.S., 1955. “The Interaction in Beta-Decay”, in Beta- and Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy, K. Siegbahn (ed.), New York, Interscience: 314–356. (Scholar)
• Wu, C.S., E. Ambler, R.W. Hayward, et al., 1957. “Experimental Test of Parity Nonconservation in Beta Decay”, Physical Review, 105: 1413–1415. (Scholar)
• Wu, C.S. and A. Schwarzschild, 1958. A Critical Examination of the He⁶ Recoil Experiment of Rustad and Ruby. New York, Columbia University. (Scholar)

Other Suggested Reading

• Ackermann, R., 1988. “Experiments as the Motor of Scientific Progress”, Social Epistemology, 2: 327–335. (Scholar)
• Batens, D. and J.P. Van Bendegem (eds.), 1988. Theory and Experiment, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. (Scholar)
• Burian, R. M., 1992. “How the Choice of Experimental Organism Matters: Biological Practices and Discipline Boundaries”, Synthese, 92: 151–166. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993. “How the Choice of Experimental Organism Matters: Epistemological Reflections on an Aspect of Biological Practice”, Journal of the History of Biology, 26: 351–367. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993b. “Technique, Task Definition, and the Transition from Genetics to Molecular Genetics: Aspects of the Work on Protein Synthesis in the Laboratories of J. Monod and P. Zamecnik”, Journal of the History of Biology, 26: 387–407. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995. “Comments on Rheinberger”, in Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, G. Wolters, J. G. Lennox and P. McLaughlin (eds.), Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press: 123–136. (Scholar)
• Franklin, A., 2018. Is It the Same Result? Replication in Physics. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool. (Scholar)
• Franklin, A. and R. Laymon, 2019. Measuring Nothing, Repeatedly, San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021. Once Can Be Enough: Decisive Experiments. No Replication Required, Heidelberg: Springer. (Scholar)
• Gooding, D., 1990. Experiment and the Making of Meaning, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
• Gooding, D., T. Pinch and S. Schaffer (eds.), 1989. The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Koertge, N. (ed.), 1998. A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Nelson, A., 1994. “How Could Scientific Facts be Socially Constructed?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 25(4): 535–547. (Scholar)
• Pickering, A. (ed.), 1992. Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995. The Mangle of Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Pinch, T., 1986. Confronting Nature, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
• Rasmussen, N., 1993. “Facts, Artifacts, and Mesosomes: Practicing Epistemology with the Electron Microscope”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 24: 227–265. (Scholar)
• Rheinberger, H.-J., 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
• Shapere, D., 1982. “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy”, Philosophy of Science, 49: 482–525. (Scholar)
• Weber, M., 2005. Philosophy of Experimental Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)