Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Intertheory Relations in Physics" by Patricia Palacios

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Anderson, Philip W., 1972, “More Is Different: Broken Symmetry and the Nature of the Hierarchical Structure of Science.”, Science, 177(4047): 393–396. doi:10.1126/science.177.4047.393 (Scholar)
Ardourel, Vincent, 2018, “The Infinite Limit as an Eliminable Approximation for Phase Transitions”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 62: 71–84. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.06.002 (Scholar)
Ardourel, Vincent and Sorin Bangu, 2023, “Finite-Size Scaling Theory: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Critical Phenomena”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 100: 99–106. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.05.010 (Scholar)
Bain, Jonathan, 2013a, “Effective Field Theories”, in Batterman (ed.) 2013a: 224–254 (ch. 6). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195392043.013.0007 (Scholar)
–––, 2013b, “Emergence in Effective Field Theories”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(3): 257–273. doi:10.1007/s13194-013-0067-0 (Scholar)
Balzer, Wolfgang, C. Ulises Moulines, and Joseph D. Sneed, 1987, An Architectonic for Science: The Structuralist Program, (Synthese Library 186), Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3765-9 (Scholar)
Bangu, Sorin, 2011, “On the role of bridge laws in intertheoretic relations”, Philosophy of Science, 78(5): 1108–1119. doi:10.1086/662272 (Scholar)
–––, 2019, “Discontinuities and Singularities, Data and Phenomena: For Referentialism”, Synthese, 196(5): 1919–1937. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1747-2 (Scholar)
Barrett, Thomas William and Hans Halvorson, 2016, “Glymour and Quine on Theoretical Equivalence”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45(5): 467–483. doi:10.1007/s10992-015-9382-6 (Scholar)
Barrow, John D., 2007, New Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation, second edition, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Batterman, Robert W., 1995, “Theories between Theories: Asymptotic Limiting Intertheoretic Relations”, Synthese, 103(2): 171–201. doi:10.1007/bf01090047 (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “Multiple Realizability and Universality”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51(1): 115–145. doi:10.1093/bjps/51.1.115 (Scholar)
–––, 2002, The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence, (Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Science), Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195146476.001.0001 (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “Critical Phenomena and Breaking Drops: Infinite Idealizations in Physics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 36(2): 225–244. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.05.004 (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “Idealization and modeling”, Synthese, 169: 427–446.doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9436-1 (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Emergence, Singularities, and Symmetry Breaking”, Foundations of Physics, 41(6): 1031–1050. doi:10.1007/s10701-010-9493-4 (Scholar)
––– (ed.), 2013a, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195392043.001.0001 (Scholar)
–––, 2013b, “The Tyranny of Scales”, in Batterman (ed.) 2013a: 255–286 (ch. 7). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195392043.013.0008 (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Autonomy of Theories: An Explanatory Problem”, Noûs, 52(4): 858–873. doi:10.1111/nous.12191 (Scholar)
–––, 2021, A Middle Way: A Non-Fundamental Approach to Many-Body Physics, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197568613.001.0001 (Scholar)
Batterman, Robert W. and Sara Green, 2021, “Steel and Bone: Mesoscale Modeling and Middle-out Strategies in Physics and Biology”, Synthese, 199(1–2): 1159–1184. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02769-y (Scholar)
Baker, David John, 2021, “Knox’s Inertial Spacetime Functionalism (and a Better Alternative)”, Synthese, 199(S2): 277–298. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02598-z (Scholar)
Beckermann, Ansgar, Hans Flohr, and Jaegwon Kim (eds.), 1992, Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. (Scholar)
Berry, Michael, 2002, “Singular Limits”, Physics Today, 55(5): 10–11. doi:10.1063/1.1485555 (Scholar)
Beth, E.W., 1959, The Foundations of Mathematics, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. (Scholar)
Bickle, John, 1996, “New Wave Psychophysical Reductionism and the Methodological Caveats”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 56(1): 57–78. doi:10.2307/2108465 (Scholar)
–––, 1998, Psychoneural Reduction: The New Wave, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Boltzmann, Ludwig, 1885, “Ueber die Möglichkeit der Begründung einer kinetischen Gastheorie auf anziehende Kräfte allein”, Annalen der Physik, 260(1): 37–44. doi:10.1002/andp.18852600104 (Scholar)
Broad, C. D., 1925, The Mind and Its Place in Nature, (International Library of Psychology, Philosophy and Scientific Method), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
Bursten, Julia R., 2018, “Smaller than a Breadbox: Scale and Natural Kinds”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(1): 1–23. doi:10.1093/bjps/axw022 (Scholar)
Butterfield, Jeremy, 2011a, “Emergence, Reduction and Supervenience: A Varied Landscape”, Foundations of Physics, 41(6): 920–959. doi:10.1007/s10701-011-9549-0 (Scholar)
–––, 2011b, “Less Is Different: Emergence and Reduction Reconciled”, Foundations of Physics, 41(6): 1065–1135. doi:10.1007/s10701-010-9516-1 (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Reduction, Emergence, and Renormalization”:, Journal of Philosophy, 111(1): 5–49. doi:10.5840/jphil201411111 (Scholar)
Butterfield, Jeremy and Nazim Bouatta, 2012, “Emergence and Reduction Combined in Phase Transitions”, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1446(1): 383–403. doi:10.1063/1.4728007 (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Renormalization for Philosophers”, in Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics, Tomasz Bigaj and Christian Wüthrich (eds.), Leiden/Boston: Brill, 437–485. doi:10.1163/9789004310827_018 (Scholar)
Butterfield, Jeremy and Henrique Gomes, 2022, see Gomes and Butterfield 2022. (Scholar)
–––, 2023, “Functionalism as a Species of Reduction”, in Current Debates in Philosophy of Science: In Honor of Roberto Torretti, Cristián Soto (ed.), (Synthese Library), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 123–200. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32375-1_7 (Scholar)
Callender, Craig, 1999, “Reducing Thermodynamics to Statistical Mechanics: The Case of Entropy”, Journal of Philosophy, 96(7): 348–373. doi:10.5840/jphil199996733 (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Taking Thermodynamics Too Seriously”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32(4): 539–553. doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(01)00025-9 (Scholar)
Cao, Tian Yu and Silvan S. Schweber, 1993, “The Conceptual Foundations and the Philosophical Aspects of Renormalization Theory”, Synthese, 97(1): 33–108. doi:10.1007/bf01255832 (Scholar)
Castellani, Elena, 2002, “Reductionism, Emergence, and Effective Field Theories”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33(2): 251–267. doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(02)00003-5 (Scholar)
Churchland, Paul M., 1979, Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind, (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy), Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625435 (Scholar)
–––, 1985, “Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States”, The Journal of Philosophy, 82(1): 8–28. doi:10.2307/2026509 (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “On the Nature of Theories: A Neurocomputational Perspective”, in Scientific Theories, C. W. Savage (ed.), (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 59–101, [Churchland 1990 available online] (Scholar)
Crowther, Karen, 2015, “Decoupling Emergence and Reduction in Physics”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(3): 419–445. doi:10.1007/s13194-015-0119-8 (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Inter-Theory Relations in Quantum Gravity: Correspondence, Reduction, and Emergence”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 63: 74–85. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.12.002 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “What Is the Point of Reduction in Science?”, Erkenntnis, 85(6): 1437–1460. doi:10.1007/s10670-018-0085-6 (Scholar)
Davidson, Donald, 1970, “Mental Events”, in Experience and Theory, Lawrence Foster and Joe William Swanson (eds.), Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 79–101. Reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980, 207–224; second edition, 2001, 207–228. doi:10.1093/0199246270.003.0011 (Scholar)
De Haro, Sebastian, 2019, “Towards a Theory of Emergence for the Physical Sciences”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(3): article 38. doi:10.1007/s13194-019-0261-9 (Scholar)
De Haro, Sebastian, Daniel R. Mayerson, and Jeremy N. Butterfield, 2016, “Conceptual Aspects of Gauge/Gravity Duality”, Foundations of Physics, 46(11): 1381–1425. doi:10.1007/s10701-016-0037-4 (Scholar)
Dewar, Neil, 2019, “Supervenience, Reduction, and Translation”, Philosophy of Science, 86(5): 942–954. doi:10.1086/705445 (Scholar)
Dizadji-Bahmani, Foad, Roman Frigg, and Stephan Hartmann, 2010, “Who’s Afraid of Nagelian Reduction?”, Erkenntnis, 73(3): 393–412. doi:10.1007/s10670-010-9239-x (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Confirmation and Reduction: A Bayesian Account”, Synthese, 179(2): 321–338. doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9775-6 (Scholar)
Einstein, Albert, 1940, “Considerations Concerning the Fundaments of Theoretical Physics”, Science, 91(2369): 487–492. doi:10.1126/science.91.2369.487 (Scholar)
Ellis, George F. R., 2020, “Emergence in Solid State Physics and Biology”, Foundations of Physics, 50(10): 1098–1139. doi:10.1007/s10701-020-00367-z (Scholar)
Endicott, Ronald P., 1998, “Collapse of the New Wave”, The Journal of Philosophy, 95(2): 53–72. doi:10.2307/2564571 (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Post-Structuralist Angst—Critical Notice: John Bickle, Psychoneural Reduction: The New Wave”, Philosophy of Science, 68(3): 377–393. doi:10.1086/392890 (Scholar)
Esfeld, Michael and Christian Sachse, 2011, Conservative Reductionism, New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203817346 (Scholar)
Feintzeig, Benjamin H., 2019, “Deduction and Definability in Infinite Statistical Systems”, Synthese, 196(5): 1831–1861. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1497-6 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “The Classical Limit as an Approximation”, Philosophy of Science, 87(4): 612–639. doi:10.1086/709731 (Scholar)
–––, 2022, “Reductive Explanation and the Construction of Quantum Theories”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 73(2): 457–486. doi:10.1093/bjps/axz051 (Scholar)
Feyerabend, Paul K., 1962, “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism”, in Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, Herbert Feigl and Grover Maxwell (eds.), (Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science 3), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 28–97. [Feyerabend 1962 available online] (Scholar)
Fletcher, Samuel C., 2016, “Similarity, Topology, and Physical Significance in Relativity Theory”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(2): 365–389. doi:10.1093/bjps/axu044 (Scholar)
–––, 2019, “On the Reduction of General Relativity to Newtonian Gravitation”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 68: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.005 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Similarity Structure and Emergent Properties”, Philosophy of Science, 87(2): 281–301. doi:10.1086/707563 (Scholar)
Fodor, Jerry A., 1974, “Special Sciences (or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis)”, Synthese, 28(2): 97–115. doi:10.1007/bf00485230 (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “Special Sciences: Still Autonomous After All These Years”, Philosophical Perspectives, 11: 149–163. (Scholar)
Fraser, James D., 2016, “Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Finite Systems”, Philosophy of Science, 83(4): 585–605. doi:10.1086/687263 (Scholar)
Franklin, Alexander, 2018, “On the Renormalization Group Explanation of Universality”, Philosophy of Science, 85(2): 225–248. doi:10.1086/696812 (Scholar)
–––, 2019, “Universality Reduced”, Philosophy of Science, 86(5): 1295–1306. doi:10.1086/705473 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Whence the Effectiveness of Effective Field Theories?”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(4): 1235–1259. doi:10.1093/bjps/axy050 (Scholar)
Frigg, Roman, 2008, “A Field Guide to Recent Work on the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics”, in The Ashgate Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Physics, Dean Rickles (ed.), London: Routledge, 99–196 (ch. 3). (Scholar)
–––, 2022, Models and Theories: A Philosophical Inquiry, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003285106 (Scholar)
Georgi, Howard, 1993, “Effective Field Theory”, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 43: 209–252. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.43.120193.001233 (Scholar)
Giudice, Gian Francesco, 2008, “Naturally Speaking: The Naturalness Criterion and Physics at the LHC”, in Perspectives on LHC Physics, Gordon Kane and Aaron Pierce (eds.), Singapore: World Scientific, 155–178. doi:10.1142/9789812779762_0010 (Scholar)
Glymour, Clark N., 1980, Theory and Evidence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Goldenfeld, Nigel, 1992, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group, Boulder, CO: Westview. (Scholar)
Gomes, Henrique and Jeremy Butterfield, 2022, “Geometrodynamics as Functionalism About Time”, in From Quantum to Classical: Essays in Honour of H.-Dieter Zeh, Claus Kiefer (ed.), (Fundamental Theories of Physics 204), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 135–178. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88781-0_8 (Scholar)
Gribbin, John, 2009, The search for superstrings, symmetry, and the theory of everything, New York: Back Bay Books. (Scholar)
Hartle, James B., 2003, “Theories of Everything and Hawking’s Wave Function of the Universe”, in The Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology: Celebrating Stephen Hawking’s Contributions to Physics, G. W. Gibbons, E. P. S. Shellard, and S. J. Rankin (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–50 (ch. 3). (Scholar)
Hartmann, Stephan, 2001, “Effective Field Theories, Reductionism and Scientific Explanation”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32(2): 267–304. doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(01)00005-3 (Scholar)
Hawking, Stephen W., 1984, “The quantum state of the universe”, Nuclear Physics B, 239(1): 257–276. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90093-2 (Scholar)
Hellman, Geoffrey Paul and Frank Wilson Thompson, 1975, “Physicalism: Ontology, Determination, and Reduction”, The Journal of Philosophy, 72(17): 551–564. doi:10.2307/2025067 (Scholar)
–––, 1977, “Physicalist Materialism”, Noûs, 11(4): 309–345. doi:10.2307/2214560 (Scholar)
Hempel, Carl G., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation: And Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Free Press. (Scholar)
Huggett, Nick and Robert Weingard, 1995, “The Renormalisation Group and Effective Field Theories”, Synthese, 102(1): 171–194. doi:10.1007/bf01063904 (Scholar)
Humphreys, Paul W., 2015, “More Is Different…Sometimes: Ising Models, Emergence, and Undecidability”, in Why More Is Different: Philosophical Issues in Condensed Matter Physics and Complex Systems, Brigitte Falkenburg and Margaret Morrison (eds.), (The Frontiers Collection), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 137–152. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43911-1_8 (Scholar)
Hüttemann, Andreas, 2004, What’s Wrong with Microphysicalism?, (International Library of Philosophy), London/New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203390771 (Scholar)
Kadanoff, Leo P., 2009, “More Is the Same; Phase Transitions and Mean Field Theories”, Journal of Statistical Physics, 137(5–6): 777–797. doi:10.1007/s10955-009-9814-1 (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Theories of Matter: Infinities and Renormalization”, in Batterman (ed.) 2013a: 141–188 (ch. 4). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195392043.013.0005 (Scholar)
Kemeny, John G. and Paul Oppenheim, 1956, “On Reduction”, Philosophical Studies, 7(1–2): 6–19. doi:10.1007/bf02333288 (Scholar)
Kim, Jaegwon, 1984, “Concepts of Supervenience”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 45(2): 153–176. doi:10.2307/2107423 (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept”, Metaphilosophy, 21(1–2): 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1990.tb00830.x (Scholar)
–––, 1998, Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation, (Representation and Mind), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/4629.001.0001 (Scholar)
Kitcher, Philip, 1984, “1953 and All That. A Tale of Two Sciences”, The Philosophical Review, 93(3): 335–373. doi:10.2307/2184541 (Scholar)
Klein, M. J., 1973, “The Development of Boltzmann’s Statistical Ideas”, in The Boltzmann Equation: Theory and Application, E. G. D. Cohen and W. Thirring (eds.), Vienna/New York: Springer, 53–106. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-8336-6_4 (Scholar)
Knox, Eleanor, 2019, “Physical Relativity from a Functionalist Perspective”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 67: 118–124. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.09.008 (Scholar)
Lakatos, Imre, 1974 [1978], “Science and Pseudoscience”, in Philosophy in the Open, Godfrey Vesey (ed.), Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Reprinted in The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers 1, John Worrall and Gregory Currie (eds.), Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978, 1–7. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511621123.002 (Scholar)
Lam, Vincent and Christian Wüthrich, 2021, “Spacetime Functionalism from a Realist Perspective”, Synthese, 199(S2): 335–353. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02642-y (Scholar)
Landsman, N.P. (Klaas), 2007, “Between Classical and Quantum”, in Philosophy of Physics, Jeremy Butterfield and John Earman (eds.), (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 2), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 417–553. doi:10.1016/b978-044451560-5/50008-7 (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Systems: Emergence or Reduction?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44(4): 379–394. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.07.003 (Scholar)
–––, 2017, Foundations of Quantum Theory: From Classical Concepts to Operator Algebras, (Fundamental Theories of Physics 188), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51777-3 (Scholar)
Laughlin, R. B. and David Pines, 2000, “The Theory of Everything”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(1): 28–31. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.1.28 (Scholar)
Lavis, David A., Reimer Kühn, and Roman Frigg, 2021, “Becoming Large, Becoming Infinite: The Anatomy of Thermal Physics and Phase Transitions in Finite Systems”, Foundations of Physics, 51(5): article 90. doi:10.1007/s10701-021-00482-5 (Scholar)
Lewis, David,1972, “Psychophysical and theoretical identifications”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 50(3): 249–258. doi:10.1080/00048407212341301 (Scholar)
List, Christian, 2019, “Levels: Descriptive, Explanatory, and Ontological”, Noûs, 53(4): 852–883. doi:10.1111/nous.12241 (Scholar)
List, Christian and Peter Menzies, 2009, “Nonreductive Physicalism and the Limits of the Exclusion Principle”:, Journal of Philosophy, 106(9): 475–502. doi:10.5840/jphil2009106936 (Scholar)
Liu, Chuang and Gérard G. Emch, 2005, “Explaining Quantum Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 36(1): 137–163. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.12.003 (Scholar)
Lorenzetti, Lorenzo, 2023, “Functionalism, Reductionism, and Levels of Reality”, Philosophy of Science, 90(4): 922–936. doi:10.1017/psa.2023.4 (Scholar)
–––, 2024, “Two Forms of Functional Reductionism in Physics”, Synthese, vol. 23, art. no. 66. doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04507-0 (Scholar)
Luu, Thomas and Ulf-G. Meißner, 2020, “Misconceptions on Effective Field Theories and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking: Response to Ellis’ Article”, Foundations of Physics, 50(10): 1140–1151. doi:10.1007/s10701-020-00368-y (Scholar)
–––, 2021, “On the Topic of Emergence from an Effective Field Theory Perspective”, in Top-Down Causation and Emergence, Jan Voosholz and Markus Gabriel (eds.), (Synthese Library), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 101–114. (Scholar)
Mainwood, Paul, 2006, Is More Different? Emergent Properties in Physics, PhD, University of Oxford. [Mainwood 2006 available online] (Scholar)
Manohar, Aneesh V., 1997, “Effective Field Theories”, in Perturbative and Nonperturbative Aspects of Quantum Field Theory: Proceedings of the 35. Internationale Universitätswochen für Kern- und Teilchenphysik, Schladming, Austria, March 2–9, 1996, H. Latal and W. Schweiger (eds.), (Lecture Notes in Physics 479), Berlin/New York: Springer, 311–362. doi:10.1007/bfb0104294 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Introduction to Effective Field Theories”, in Effective Field Theory in Particle Physics and Cosmology, Sacha Davidson, Paolo Gambino, Mikko Laine, Matthias Neubert, and Christophe Salomon (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 47–136. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198855743.003.0002 (Scholar)
Matsubara, Keizo, 2013, “Realism, Underdetermination and String Theory Dualities”, Synthese, 190(3): 471–489. doi:10.1007/s11229-011-0041-3 (Scholar)
McGivern, Patrick, 2008, “Reductive Levels and Multi-Scale Structure”, Synthese, 165(1): 53–75. doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9232-3 (Scholar)
McKenzie, Kerry, 2019, “Fundamentality”, in The Routledge Handbook of Emergence, Sophie Gibb, Robin Findlay, and Tom Lancaster (eds.), Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 54–64 (ch. 3). (Scholar)
Morganti, Matteo, 2020a, “Fundamentality in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Physics. Part I: Metaphysics”, Philosophy Compass, 15(7): e12690. doi:10.1111/phc3.12690 (Scholar)
–––, 2020b, “Fundamentality in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Physics. Part II: The Philosophy of Physics”, Philosophy Compass, 15(10): e12703. doi:10.1111/phc3.12703 (Scholar)
Morrison, Margaret, 2012, “Emergent Physics and Micro-Ontology”, Philosophy of Science, 79(1): 141–166. doi:10.1086/663240 (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “Why Is More Different?”, in Why More Is Different: Philosophical Issues in Condensed Matter Physics and Complex Systems, Brigitte Falkenburg and Margaret Morrison (eds.), (The Frontiers Collection), Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 91–114. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43911-1_6 (Scholar)
Moulines, C. Ulises, 1980, “Intertheoretic Approximation: The Kepler-Newton Case”, Synthese, 45(3): 387–412. doi:10.1007/bf02221785 (Scholar)
–––, 1984, “Ontological Reduction in the Natural Sciences (1)”, in Reduction in Science: Structure, Examples, Philosophical Problems, Wolfgang Balzer, David A. Pearce, and Heinz-Jürgen Schmidt (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 51–70. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-6454-9_5 (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “Ontology, Reduction, Emergence: A General Frame”, Synthese, 151(3): 313–323. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9011-6 (Scholar)
Nagel, Ernest, 1949, “The Meaning of Reduction in the Natural Sciences”, in Science And Civilization, Robert C. Stauffer (ed.), Madison, WI: University Of Wisconsin Press, 99–138 (ch. 4). (Scholar)
–––, 1961, The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Scholar)
–––, 1970, “Issues in the Logic of Reductive Explanations”, in Mind, Science, and History, Howard Evans Kiefer and Milton K. Munitz (eds.), (Contemporary Philosophic Thought 2), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 117–137. (Scholar)
Nickles, Thomas, 1973, “Two Concepts of Intertheoretic Reduction”, The Journal of Philosophy, 70(7): 181–201. doi:10.2307/2024906 (Scholar)
Norton, John D., 2012, “Approximation and Idealization: Why the Difference Matters”, Philosophy of Science, 79(2): 207–232. doi:10.1086/664746 (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Infinite Idealizations”, in European Philosophy of Science – Philosophy of Science in Europe and the Viennese Heritage, Maria Carla Galavotti, Elisabeth Nemeth, and Friedrich Stadler (eds.), (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 17), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 197–210. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01899-7_14 (Scholar)
Palacios, Patricia, 2018, “Had We But World Enough, and Time… But We Don’t! Justifying the Thermodynamic and Infinite-Time Limits in Statistical Mechanics”, Foundations of Physics, 48(5): 526–541. doi:10.1007/s10701-018-0165-0 (Scholar)
–––, 2019, “Phase Transitions: A Challenge for Intertheoretic Reduction?”, Philosophy of Science, 86(4): 612–640. doi:10.1086/704974 (Scholar)
–––, 2022, Emergence and Reduction in Physics, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108901017 (Scholar)
–––, 2023, “Intertheoretic Reduction in Physics Beyond the Nagelian Model”, in Current Debates in Philosophy of Science: In Honor of Roberto Torretti, Cristián Soto (ed.), (Synthese Library 477), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 201–225. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32375-1_8 (Scholar)
Palacios, Patricia and Giovanni Valente, 2021, “The Paradox of Infinite Limits: A Realist Response”, in Contemporary Scientific Realism: The Challenge from the History of Science, Timothy D. Lyons and Peter Vickers (eds), New York: Oxford University Press, 312–349 (ch. 14). doi:10.1093/oso/9780190946814.003.0014 (Scholar)
Putnam, Hilary, 1967, “Psychological Predicates”, in Art, Mind, and Religion, W. H. Capitan and Daniel D. Merrill (eds), Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 37–48. (Scholar)
Read, James, 2016, “The Interpretation of String-Theoretic Dualities”, Foundations of Physics, 46(2): 209–235. doi:10.1007/s10701-015-9961-y (Scholar)
Rickles, Dean, 2011, “A Philosopher Looks at String Dualities”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42(1): 54–67. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.12.005 (Scholar)
–––, 2017, “Dual Theories: ‘Same but Different’ or ‘Different but Same’?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 59: 62–67. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.09.005 (Scholar)
Rivat, Sébastien and Alexei Grinbaum, 2020, “Philosophical Foundations of Effective Field Theories”, The European Physical Journal A, 56(3): article 90. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00089-w (Scholar)
Robertson, Katie, 2022, “In Search of the Holy Grail: How to Reduce the Second Law of Thermodynamics”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 73(4): 987–1020. doi:10.1086/714795 (Scholar)
Rosaler, Joshua, 2015, “Local Reduction in Physics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 50: 54–69. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.02.004 (Scholar)
–––, 2019, “Reduction as an a posteriori Relation”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(1): 269–299. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx026 (Scholar)
Rueger, Alexander, 2000a, “Physical Emergence, Diachronic And Synchronic”, Synthese, 124(3): 297–322. doi:10.1023/a:1005249907425 (Scholar)
–––, 2000b, “Robust Supervenience and Emergence”, Philosophy of Science, 67(3): 466–489. doi:10.1086/392791 (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “Reduction, Autonomy, and Causal Exclusion Among Physical Properties}”, Synthese, 139(1): 1–21. doi:10.1023/b:synt.0000021305.91409.d3 (Scholar)
Ruetsche, Laura, 2011, Interpreting Quantum Theories, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535408.001.0001 (Scholar)
Saatsi, Juha and Alexander Reutlinger, 2018, “Taking Reductionism to the Limit: How to Rebut the Antireductionist Argument from Infinite Limits”, Philosophy of Science, 85(3): 455–482. doi:10.1086/697735 (Scholar)
Sarkar, Sahotra, 1992, “Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism”, Synthese, 91(3): 167–194. doi:10.1007/bf00413566 (Scholar)
–––, 1998, Genetics and Reductionism, (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology), Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173216 (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “Nagel on Reduction”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 53: 43–56. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.05.006 (Scholar)
Schaffner, Kenneth F., 1967, “Approaches to Reduction”, Philosophy of Science, 34(2): 137–147. doi:10.1086/288137 (Scholar)
–––, 1974, “Reductionism in biology: Prospects and problems”, in PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association, vol. 1974: 613–632. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1974.495830 (Scholar)
–––, 1977, “Reduction, Reductionism, Values, and Progress in the Biomedical Sciences”, in Logic, Laws, & Life: Some Philosophical Complications, Robert Garland Colodny and Leonard J. Savage (eds.), (University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science  6), Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 143–171. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Ernest Nagel and Reduction”:, Journal of Philosophy, 109(8/9): 534–565. doi:10.5840/jphil20121098/926 (Scholar)
Scheibe, Erhard, 1997, Die Reduktion physikalischer Theorien: Ein Beitrag zur Einheit der Physik, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58247-9 (Scholar)
Shech, Elay, 2013, “What Is the Paradox of Phase Transitions?”, Philosophy of Science, 80(5): 1170–1181. doi:10.1086/674000 (Scholar)
Shech, Elay and Patrick McGivern, 2021, “Fundamentality, Scale, and the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect”, Erkenntnis, 86(6): 1411–1430. doi:10.1007/s10670-019-00161-y (Scholar)
Sklar, Lawrence, 1967, “Types of Inter-Theoretic Reduction”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 18(2): 109–124. doi:10.1093/bjps/18.2.109 (Scholar)
–––, 1993, Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511624933 (Scholar)
Sneed, Joseph D., 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, (Synthese Library), Dordrecht: Reidel. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-3066-3 (Scholar)
Sommerfeld, Arnold, 1950 [1954], Optik, (His Vorlesungen über theoretische Physik, Bd. 4), Wiesbaden: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung. Translated as Optics, Otto Laporte and Peter A. Moldauer (trans.), (Lectures on Theoretical Physics 4), New York: Academic Press, 1954. (Scholar)
’t Hooft, Gerard, 2017, “Free Will in the Theory of Everything”, Presented at the Workshop on “Determinism and Free Will”, Milano, 13 May 2017. doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.02874 (Scholar)
’t Hooft, Gerard, Leonard Susskind, Edward Witten, Masataka Fukugita, Lisa Randall, Lee Smolin, John Stachel, Carlo Robelli, George Ellis, Steven Weinberg, and Roger Penrose, 2005, “A Theory of Everything?”, Nature, 433(7023): 257–259. doi:10.1038/433257a (Scholar)
Torretti, Roberto, 1990, Creative Understanding: Philosophical Reflections on Physics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Uffink, Jos, 2001, “Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32(3): 305–394. doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(01)00016-8 (Scholar)
Valente, Giovanni, 2021, “Taking up Statistical Thermodynamics: Equilibrium Fluctuations and Irreversibility”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 85: 176–184. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.10.006 (Scholar)
Van Riel, Raphael, 2011, “Nagelian Reduction beyond the Nagel Model”, Philosophy of Science, 78(3): 353–375. doi:10.1086/660300 (Scholar)
Wallace, David, 2019, “Naturalness and Emergence”, The Monist, 102(4): 499–524. doi:10.1093/monist/onz022 (Scholar)
Wayne, Andrew, 2012, “Emergence and Singular Limits”, Synthese, 184(3): 341–356. doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9817-0 (Scholar)
Weatherall, James Owen, 2019a, “Part 1: Theoretical Equivalence in Physics”, Philosophy Compass, 14(5): e12592. doi:10.1111/phc3.12592 (Scholar)
–––, 2019b, “Part 2: Theoretical Equivalence in Physics”, Philosophy Compass, 14(5): e12591. doi:10.1111/phc3.12591 (Scholar)
Weinberg, Steven, 2001, Facing up: Science and Its Cultural Adversaries, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Wells, James D., 2012, “Effective Field Theories and the Role of Consistency in Theory Choice”, delivered at the conference on “The Epistemology of the Large Hadron Collider”, Wuppertal University, January 2012. doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.0634 (Scholar)
Williams, Porter, 2015, “Naturalness, the Autonomy of Scales, and the 125GeV Higgs”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 51: 82–96. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.05.003 (Scholar)
Wilson, Mark, 2017, Physics Avoidance: And Other Essays in Conceptual Strategy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803478.001.0001 (Scholar)
Wimsatt, William C., 1976, “Reductionism, Levels of Organization, and the Mind-Body Problem”, in Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry, Gordon G. Globus, Grover Maxwell, and Irwin Savodnik (eds.), Boston, MA: Springer US, 205–267. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2196-5_9 (Scholar)
Worrall, John, 1989, “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?”, Dialectica, 43(1–2): 99–124. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x (Scholar)
Wu, Jingyi, 2021, “Explaining Universality: Infinite Limit Systems in the Renormalization Group Method”, Synthese, 199(5–6): 14897–14930. doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03448-2 (Scholar)

Generated Mon Apr 14 05:24:49 2025

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...