Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Notation in Principia Mathematica" by Bernard Linsky

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Boolos G. , Burgess, J., and Jeffrey, R., 2007, Computability and Logic, 5th edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Carnap, R., 1947, Meaning and Necessity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Church, A., 1976, “Comparison of Russell’s Resolution of the Semantical Antinomies with That of Tarski”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 41: 747–60. (Scholar)
  • Chwistek, L., 1924, “The Theory of Constructive Types”, Annales de la Société Polonaise de Mathématique (Rocznik Polskiego Towarzystwa Matematycznego), II: 9–48. (Scholar)
  • Curry, H.B., 1937, “On the use of Dots as Brackets in Logical Expressions”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 2: 26–28. (Scholar)
  • Elkind, Landon D.C., and Zach, R., forthcoming, “The Genealogy of \( \vee \)”, Review of Symbolic Logic, 2022. (Scholar)
  • Feys, R. and Fitch, F.B., 1969, Dictionary of Symbols of Mathematical Logic, Amsterdam: North Holland. (Scholar)
  • Fraenkel, A.A., 1968, Abstract Set Theory, Amsterdam: North Holland. (Scholar)
  • Gödel, K., 1944, “Russell’s Mathematical Logic”, in P.A. Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, LaSalle: Open Court, 125–153. (Scholar)
  • Krivine, J-L., 1971, Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory, Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Landini, G., 1998, Russell’s Hidden Substitutional Theory, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Linsky, B., 1999, Russell’s Metaphysical Logic, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009, “From Descriptive Functions to Sets of Ordered Pairs”, in Reduction – Abstraction – Analysis, A. Hieke and H. Leitgeb (eds.), Ontos: Munich, 259–272. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, The Evolution of Principia Mathematica: Bertrand Russell’s Manuscripts and Notes for the Second Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Quine, W.V.O., 1951, “Whitehead and the Rise of Modern Logic”, The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, ed. P.A. Schilpp, 2nd edition, New York: Tudor Publishing, 127–163. (Scholar)
  • Russell, B., 1905, “On Denoting”, Mind (N.S.), 14: 530–538. (Scholar)
  • Suppes, P., 1960, Axiomatic Set Theory, Amsterdam: North Holland. (Scholar)
  • Turing, A.M., 1942, “The Use of Dots as Brackets in Church’s System”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 7:146–156. (Scholar)
  • Whitehead, A.N. and B. Russell, [PM], Principia Mathematica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910–13, 2nd edition, 1925–27.
  • Whitehead, A.N. and B. Russell, 1962, Principia Mathematica to ∗56, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Zermelo, E., 1904, “Proof that every set can be well-ordered”, in From Frege to Gödel, J. van Heijenoort (ed.), Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1967, 139–141. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Oct 2 16:39:38 2022