Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Port Royal Logic" by Alan Nelson and Jill Buroker
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
Recent Editions of the Port-Royal Logic
All quotations and citations to the Port Royal Logic are to the
Buroker translation, 1996, listed below.
- Arnauld, Antoine et Pierre Nicole, La Logique ou l’art
de penser, édition critique par Pierre Clair et
François Girbal, Paris. J. Vrin, 1981.
- Arnauld, Antoine et Pierre Nicole, La Logique ou l’art
de penser, édition critique par Dominique Descartes,
Paris: Champion, 2011.
- Arnauld, Antoine, The Art of Thinking, Port-Royal Logic,
translated by James Dickoff and Patricia James, New York: Library of
Liberal Arts, 1964. [Watson (1967) argues that using this translation
requires caution.]
- [Logic] Arnauld, Antoine and Pierre Nicole, Logic or
the Art of Thinking, translated by Jill Vance Buroker, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1996. References are to part, chapter, and
page number. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139166768 (Scholar)
Works Cited or Recommended
- Arnauld, Antoine, 1667, Noveaux Élements de
Géométrie (New Elements of Geometry),
Paris: Savreux. (Scholar)
- Buroker, Jill Vance, 1993, “The Port-Royal Semantics of Terms”, Synthese, 96(3): 455–475. doi:10.1007/bf01064012 (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, “Judgment and Predication in
the Port-Royal Logic”, in The Great Arnauld and some of his
Philosophical Correspondents, Elmar J. Kremer (ed.), Toronto:
University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, “Arnauld on Judging and the
Will”, in Interpreting Arnauld, Elmar J. Kremer (ed.),
Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
- Chomsky, Noam, 1966 [2009], Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, New York: Harper & Row. Third edition, James McGilvray (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803116 (Scholar)
- Clark, Ruth, 1932 [1972], Strangers and Sojourners at Port
Royal; Being An Account of the Connections Between British Isles and
the Jansenists of France and Holland, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. Reprinted 1972 New York: Octagon Books, 1972. (Scholar)
- Descartes, René, c. 1628, Regulae ad Directionem
Ingenii (Rules for Direction of the Mind), manuscript.
Translated in CSM I: 7–78. (Scholar)
- –––, 1637, Discours de la Méthode pour bien conduire sa raison, et chercher la vérité dans les sciences (Discourse on the Method), Leiden. Translated in CSM I: 111–151. (Scholar)
- –––, 1641, Meditationes de prima
philosophia, in qua Dei existentia et animae immortalitas
demonstrantur (Meditations on First Principles, Paris:
Michel Soly. Translated in CSM II. (Scholar)
- –––, 1644, Principia Philosophiae (Principles of Philosophy, Amsterdam: Elzevir. Translated in CSM I: 177–291. (Scholar)
- [CSM] –––, 1984–91, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 3 volumes, John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch (trans. and eds) and Anthony Kenny (volume 3 only), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [abbreviated CSM I/II]. (Scholar)
- Finocchiaro, Maurice A., 1997, “The Port-Royal Logic’s Theory of Argument”, Argumentation, 11(4): 393–410. doi:10.1023/a:1007756105432 (Scholar)
- Frege, Gottlob, 1918, “Die Verneinung. Eine Logische Untersuchung”, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, I (1919): 143–157. Translated as “Negation”, Peter Geach (trans.) in Frege 1952: 117–35. (Scholar)
- –––, 1952, Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Peter Geach and Max Black (ed. and trans.), New York: Philosophical Library. (Scholar)
- Gaukroger, Stephen, 1989, Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes’s Conception of Inference, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Grey, John, 2017, “The Modal Equivalence Rules of the Port-Royal Logic”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 38(3): 210–221. doi:10.1080/01445340.2017.1318256 (Scholar)
- Hacking, Ian, 1975, Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627873 (Scholar)
- Jaffro, Laurent, 2018, “Locke and Port Royal on Affirmation,
Negation, and Other ‘Postures of the Mind’”, in
Locke and Cartesian Philosophy, Philippe Hamou and Martine
Pécharman (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press,
172–185. (Scholar)
- Jones, Matthew L., 2006, The Good Life in the Scientific Revolution: Descartes, Pascal, Leibniz, and the Cultivation of Virtue, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kneale, William and Martha Kneale, 1962 [1984], The Development of Logic, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Reprinted with corrections 1984. (Scholar)
- Lachterman, David Rapport, 1989, The Ethics of Geometry: A Genealogy of Modernity, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Lennon, Thomas M., 2008, The Plain Truth: Descartes, Huet, and Skepticism, (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 170), Leiden/Boston: Brill. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004171152.i-258 (Scholar)
- Martin, John N., 2020, The Cartesian Semantics of the Port Royal Logic, (Routledge Studies in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy), New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351249195 (Scholar)
- Marušić, Jennifer Smalligan, 2014, “Propositions and Judgments in Locke and Arnauld: A Monstrous and Unholy Union?”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 52(2): 255–280. doi:10.1353/hph.2014.0029 (Scholar)
- Michael, Fred S., 1997, “Why Logic Became Epistemology:
Gassendi, Port Royal and the Reformation in Logic”, in Logic
and the Workings of the Mind: The Logic of Ideas and Faculty
Psychology in Early Modern Philosophy, Patricia A. Easton (ed.),
(North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy 5), Atascadero, CA:
Ridgeview, 1–20. (Scholar)
- Miel, Jan, 1969, “Pascal, Port-Royal, and Cartesian Linguistics”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 30(2): 261–271. doi:10.2307/2708438 (Scholar)
- Nadler, Steven N., 1989, Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy
of Ideas, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Nelson, Alan, 2017, “Logic and Knowledge”, in The
Routledge Companion to Seventeenth Century Philosophy, Dan
Kaufman (ed.), New York: Routledge, ch. 8. (Scholar)
- Ott, Walter, 2002, “Propositional Attitudes in Modern Philosophy”, Dialogue, 41(3): 551–568. doi:10.1017/s0012217300005266 (Scholar)
- Pariente, Jean-Claude, 1985, L’analyse du langage
à Port-Royal, Paris: Editions de Minuit.
- Parsons, Terence, 2006, “The Doctrine of Distribution”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 27(1): 59–74. doi:10.1080/01445340500321543 (Scholar)
- Rogers, Brian and Alan Nelson, 2015, “Descartes’ Logic
and the Paradox of Deduction”, in The Battle of the Gods and
Giants Redux, Patricia Easton and Kurt Smith (eds.), Leiden:
Brill, 106–136. doi:10.1163/9789004305922_008 (Scholar)
- Schuurman, Paul, 2003, Ideas, Mental Faculties and Method: The Logic of Ideas of Descartes and Locke and Its Reception in the Dutch Republic, 1630-1750, Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789047412496 (Scholar)
- Sedgwick, Alexander, 1977, Jansenism in Seventeenth-Century
France: Voices from the Wilderness, Charlottesville, VA:
University Press of Virginia. (Scholar)
- Spade, Paul Vincent, 1982, “The Semantics of Terms”, in The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 188–196. doi:10.1017/chol9780521226059.011 (Scholar)
- Sainte-Beuve, Charles Augustin, 1840–48,
Port-Royal, 3 volumes, Paris: Renduel. Reprinted Paris:
Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1961–5. (Scholar)
- Stoianovici, Dragan, 1976, “Definite Descriptions in
Port-Royal Logic”, Revue Roumaine des Sciences
Sociales, Série de Philosophie et Logique, 20:
145–154. (Scholar)
- Van der Schaar, Maria, 2008, “Locke and Arnauld on Judgment and Proposition”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 29(4): 327–341. doi:10.1080/01445340801976532 (Scholar)
- Wahl, Russell, 2008, “Port Royal: The Stirrings of
Modernity”, in Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume 2:
Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic, Amsterdam: Elsevier,
667–699. doi:10.1016/s1874-5857(08)80034-9 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Syllogism in the Port-Royal
Logic”, in The Aftermath of Syllogism: Aristotelian Logical
Argument from Avicenna to Hegel, Marco Sgarbi and Matteo Cosci
(eds), London: Bloomsbury, ch. 6. (Scholar)
- Watson, Richard A., 1967, “The Port-Royal Logic in the Twentieth Century”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 5(1): 55–60. doi:10.1353/hph.2008.1281 (Scholar)