Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Pragmatics" by Kepa Korta and John Perry

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides, 1998, “The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition,” Journal of Semantics, 15: 239–299. (Scholar)
  • Austin, John L., 1956, “A plea of excuses,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LVII: 1–30. Reprinted in Austin 1961. (Presidential address to the Aristotelian Society in 1956. Austin expresses his views on ordinary language and ordinary language philosophy.)
  • –––, 1961, “Performative utterances,” in J.O. Urmson and G.J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers, Oxford: Clarendon. (Austin presents the distinction between performative and constative utterances.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 1962a, How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Clarendon. (Written version of Austin’s William James Lectures delivered at Harvard in 1955. He starts with the distinction performative/constative, then he blurs it to ground the ‘general theory of speech acts.’) (Scholar)
  • –––, 1962b, Sense and Sensibilia, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Reconstructed from his manuscript notes by G.J. Warnock. Austin’s critique of sense data theories of perception.) (Scholar)
  • Bach, Kent, 1987, “On communicative intentions: A reply to Recanati,” Mind and Language, 2: 141–154. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Conversational impliciture,” Mind and Language, 9: 124–162. (Influential paper on the explicit and the implicit, distinguishing ‘implicIture’ (with an ‘i’) from implicatures.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999a, “The semantics-pragmatics distinction: What it is and why it matters,” in K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, pp. 65–84. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999b, “The myth of conventional implicature,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 262–83. (Against Grice’s category of conventional implicatures.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, “Semantically speaking,” in I. Kenesei and R. M. Harnish (eds.) 2001, Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Pragmatics and the philosophy of language,” in Horn and Ward (eds.) 2004, pp. 463–87. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Context ex Machina,” in Zoltan G. Szabo (ed.), Semantics versus Pragmatics, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 15–44. (Scholar)
  • Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish, 1979, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Influential effort to integrate speech act theory and the Gricean theory of conversational implicatures). (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, “How performatives really work: A reply to Searle,” Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 93–110. (Scholar)
  • Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, 1954, “Indexical expressions,” Mind 63: 359–79; reprinted in Kasher 1998, vol. 1, pp. 23–40. (Scholar)
  • Beaver, David, 2002, “Presupposition in DRT,” in D. Beaver, L. Casillas, B. Clark, and S. Kaufmann (eds.) The Construction of Meaning, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Bezuidenhout, Anne, 2002, “Truth-Conditional Pragmatics,” Philosophical Perspectives, 16: 105–34. (Scholar)
  • Blackburn, Simon, 1984, Spreading the word: groundings in the philosophy of language, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Blakemore, Diane, 1992, Understanding Utterances, Oxford: Blackwell. (Introduction to Relevance Theory.) (Scholar)
  • Burton-Roberts, Noel, 1989a, “On Horn’s dilemma: Presupposition and negation,” Journal of Linguistics, 25, 95–125. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989b, The limits to debate: A revised theory of semantic presupposition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Presupposition-cancellation and metalinguistic negation: a reply to Carston,” Journal of Linguistics, 35, 347–64. (Scholar)
  • Cappelen, Herman and Ernest Lepore, 2005, Insensitive Semantics. A Defence of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Cappelen, Herman and Ernest Lepore, 2007, “Unarticulated constituents and hidden indexicals. An abuse of context in semantics,” in M. O’Rourke and C. Washington (eds.), Situating Semantics: Essays on the Philosophy of John Perry, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/Bradford Books, pp. 199–214. (Scholar)
  • Capone, Alessandro, 2012, “Between Scylla and Charybdis: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Attitudes De Se,” in Alessandro Capone and Neil Feit (eds.), Attitudes De Se: Linguistics, Epistemology, Metaphysics, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Carnap, Rudolf, 1942, Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Carston, Robyn, 1988, “Implicature, explicature, and truth-conditional semantics,” in R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, pp. 155–81; reprinted in Davis (ed.) 1991, pp. 33–51 and in Kasher (ed.) 1998, pp. 436–79. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “Negation, ‘presupposition’ and the semantics-pragmatics distinction,” Journal of Linguistics 34, 309–50. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “The semantics/pragmatics distinction: A view from Relevance Theory,” in K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, 1999, 85–125. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999a, “Negation, ‘presupposition’ and metarepresentation: a reply to Noel Burton-Roberts,” Journal of Linguistics, 35, 365–89. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication, Oxford: Blackwell. (Comprehensive and detailed presentation of Carston’s relevance-theoretic approach to pragmatics.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Truth-Conditional Content and Conversational Implicature,” in Claudia Bianchi (ed.), The Semantic/Pragmatics Distinction, Stanford: CSLI Publications: 65–100. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Relevance Theory, Grice and the neo-Griceans: a response to Laurence Horn’s ‘Current issues in neo-Gricean pragmatics,’” Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(3): 303–319. (Scholar)
  • Chapman, Siobhan, 2005, Paul Grice, philosopher and linguist. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (Intellectual biography of Paul Grice.) (Scholar)
  • Clark, Herbert H., 1996, Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, “Pointing and placing,” in S. Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet, Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 243–268. (Scholar)
  • Crimmins, Mark and John Perry, 1989, “The prince and the phone booth: reporting puzzling beliefs,” Journal of Philosophy, 86: 685–711. (Scholar)
  • Davies, Martin, 1995, “Philosophy of language,” in N. Bunnin and E. Tsui-James (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 90–139. (Scholar)
  • Davis, Steven, 1991, Pragmatics. A reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Comprehensive collection of fundamental papers in pragmatics.) (Scholar)
  • Devitt, Michael, 2013, “Three methodological flaws of linguistic pragmatism,” in C. Penco and F. Domaneschi (eds.), What is Said and what is not. The Semantics/pragmatics Interface, Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 285–300. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2019, “A methodological flaw? A reply to Korta and Perry,” Journal of Pragmatics, 139: 180–2. (Scholar)
  • Donnellan, Keith, 1966, “Reference and definite descriptions,” Philosophical Review, 75: 281–304; reprinted in A. P. Martinich (ed.), The Philosophy of Language, 2nd edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, pp. 235–247. (Scholar)
  • Elugardo, Reinaldo and Robert J. Stainton, 2004, “Shorthand, Syntactic Ellipsis, and the Pragmatic Determinants of What is Said,” Mind and Language, 19: 442–71. (Scholar)
  • Escandell, Victoria, 1993, Introducción a la Pragmática., Barcelona: Anthropos. (Updated edition 1996, in Barcelona: Ariel.) (Introduction to Pragmatics in Spanish.) (Scholar)
  • Ezcurdia, Maite and Robert J. Stainton (eds.), 2013, The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy, Peterborough: Broadview. (Scholar)
  • Fodor, Jerry and Ernie Lepore, 2004, “Out of Context,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 78(2): 3–20. (Scholar)
  • Fotion, Nick, 1995, “Pragmatics,” in T. Honderich (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–43. (Scholar)
  • Frege, Gottlob, 1892, “Über Sinn und Bedeutung,” in Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25–50. Translated as “On Sense and Reference” by M. Black in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, P. Geach and M. Black (eds. and trans.), Oxford: Blackwell, third edition, 1980. (Scholar)
  • Garmendia, Joana, 2010, “Irony is critical,” Pragmatics and Cognition, 18(2): 397–421. (Scholar)
  • Gazdar, Gerald, 1979, Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Green, Georgia, 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Scholar)
  • Grice, H. Paul, 1957, “Meaning,” Philosophical Review 66: 377–88; reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 213–23. (Grice’s seminal paper on M-intentions.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 1967a, “Logic and conversation,” in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.) 1975, The Logic of Grammar, Encino: Dickenson, pp. 64–75; also published in P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, 1975, pp. 41–58; reprinted in Grice, 1989, pp. 22–40. (Grice’s celebrated article on the theory of implicatures, presented in 1967 at Harvard University as the William James Lectures, and mimeographed and widely circulated before its double publication in 1975.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 1967b, “Further notes on logic and conversation,” in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 1978, pp. 147–170; reprinted in Grice, 1989, pp. 41–57. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1968, “Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning,” Foundations of Language, 4: 225–242; reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 117–137. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1969, “Utterer’s meaning and intentions,” Philosophical Review 78: 147–177; reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 86–116. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981, “Presupposition and conversational implicature,” in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 1981, pp. 183–97; reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 269–82. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1982, “Meaning revisited,” in N. V. Smith (ed.), Mutual Knowledge, London: Academic Press, pp. 223–243; reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 283–303. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. (Posthumously published volume collecting most Grice’s papers on language, meaning and communication and some other topics.) (Scholar)
  • Harman, Gilbert, 1974, “Review of Meaning by S. Schiffer,” Journal of Philosophy, 71: 224–229. (Scholar)
  • Heim, Irene, 1992, “Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs,” Journal of Semantics, 9: 183–221. (Scholar)
  • Horn, Laurence R., 1984, “Toward a new taxonomy of pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature,” in D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT ’84), Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11–42. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989, A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995, “Presupposition and implicature,” in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 299–319. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Implicature,” in Horn and Ward (eds.) 2004, pp. 3–28. (Scholar)
  • Horn, Laurence R. and Gregory Ward (eds.), 2004, The Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell. (Collection of papers by philosophers, linguists and psychologists addressing fundamental issues in pragmatics.) (Scholar)
  • Huang, Yan, 2012, The Oxford Dictionary of Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kamp, Hans, 2001, “The importance of presupposition,” in C. Rohrer and A. Rossdeutscher (eds.), Linguistic Form and its Justification (Selected papers from the SFB 340), Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Kaplan, David, 1989, “Demonstratives,” in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan, New York: Oxford University Press., pp. 481–563. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, Lauri, 1973, “Presuppositions and compound sentences,” Linguistic Inquiry, 4: 169–93. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1974, “Presupposition and linguistic context,” Theoretical Linguistics, 1: 3–44. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, Lauri and Stanley Peters, 1979, “Conventional Implicature,” in C. K. Oh and D. Dinnen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Kasher, Asa (ed.), 1998, Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, (6 vols.) London: Routledge. (Extensive collection of fundamental ‘classic’ articles in pragmatics, with interesting postscripts by the authors in many cases.) (Scholar)
  • Katz, Jerrold J., 1977, Propositional structure and illocutionary force, New York: Crowell. (Scholar)
  • Kempson, Ruth M., 1988, “Grammar and Conversational Principles,” in F. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–163. (Scholar)
  • Korta, Kepa and John Perry, 2006a, “Three demonstrations and a funeral,” Mind and Language, 21/2: 166–186. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006b, “Varieties of minimalist semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXXXIII (2): 451–459. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007a, “Radical minimalism, moderate contextualism”. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Content and Context. Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–111. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007b, “How to say things with words”. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle’s Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Thought., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–189. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, “The pragmatic circle,” Synthese, 165(3): 347; reprinted in Asa Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics II, London: Routledge, 2011, pp. 347–57.–357. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, Critical Pragmatics. An Inquiry into Reference and Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Highlights of Critical Pragmatics: Reference and the contents of the utterance,” Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(1): 161–182. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2019a, “Our alleged methodological flaw,” Journal of Pragmatics, 139: 175–179. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2019b, “Our response to Devitt,” Journal of Pragmatics, 139: 183–184. (Scholar)
  • Lepore, Ernest and Robert van Gulick (eds.), 1991, John Searle and his Critics, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Levinson, Stephen, 1983, Pragmatics, New York: Cambridge University Press. (One of the first systematic introductions to Pragmatics.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000. Presumptive Meanings, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/Bradford Books. (Monograph presenting Levinson’s theory of utterance-type-meaning and generalized conversational implicatures.) (Scholar)
  • Lycan, William, 1995, “Philosophy of Language,” in R. Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 586–589. (Scholar)
  • Montague, Richard, 1968, “Pragmatics,” in R. Klibansky (ed.) Contemporary Philosophy – La philosophie contemporaine, vol. 1, Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice, pp. 102–22; reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.) 1974, Formal Philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, pp. 95–118. (Scholar)
  • Morris, Charles, 1938, “Foundations of the theory of signs,” in O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. Morris (eds.), International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science I, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 77–138; reprinted in C. Morris 1971, Writings on the general theory of signs, The Hague: Mouton. (Scholar)
  • Neale, Stephen, 1992, “Paul Grice and the philosophy of language,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 15: 509–559. (Thorough review of Grice’s Studies in the way of words). (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “This, that, and the other,” in M. Reimer and A. Bezuidenhout (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 68–182. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2016, “Silent Reference,” in G. Ostertag (ed.), Meanings and Other Things: Essays in Honor of Stephen Schiffer, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 229–344. (Scholar)
  • ––– (forthcoming). Linguistic Pragmatism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Parikh, Prashant, 2010, Language and equilibrium. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Peirce, Charles S., 1931–58, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Hartshorne and Weiss (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Perry, John, 1986, “Thought without representation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary volume), 60: 137–51; reprinted in Perry 2000, pp. 171–188. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays, expanded edition, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, Reference and Reflexivity, Stanford: CSLI Publications. 2nd expanded and revised edition, 2012. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Situating semantics: A response,” in M. O’Rourke and C. Washington (eds.), Situating Semantics: Essays on the Philosophy of John Perry, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/Bradford Books, pp. 507–571. (Scholar)
  • Petrus, Klaus (ed.), 2010. Meaning and Analysis. New Essays on Grice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Recanati, François, 1986, “On defining communicative intentions,” Mind and Language, 1: 213–242. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989, “The pragmatics of what is said,” Mind and Language, 4: 295–329. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “Unarticulated constituents,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 25: 299–345. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, Literal meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Recanati’s defence of a contextualist view on meaning.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010,Truth-Conditional Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Reichenbach, Hans, 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic., New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Reimer, Marga and Anne Bezuidenhout, (eds.), 2004, Descriptions and beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Collection of papers on the semantics and pragmatics of descriptions and other singular terms.) (Scholar)
  • Russell, Bertrand, 1905, “On Denoting,” Mind, 14, 479–493; repr. in Bertrand Russell, Essays in Analysis, London: Allen and Unwin, 1973, 103–119; and in Bertrand Russell, Logic and Knowledge, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1956, 41–56. (Scholar)
  • Saul, Jennifer, 2002, “Speaker meaning, what is said, and what is implicated,” Noûs, 36: 228–48. (Scholar)
  • Schiffer, Stephen, 1972, Meaning, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Schlenker, Philippe, 2010, “Presuppositions and local contexts,” Mind, 19: 377–391. (Scholar)
  • Searle, John, 1965, “What is a speech act?” in M. Black (ed.), Philosophy in America, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1969, Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Presentation of Searle’s seminal development of speech act theory, based on his Oxford Ph.D. thesis on Sense and Reference.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 1975a, “A taxonomy of illocutionary acts,” in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language. Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VII, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 344–69; reprinted in J. Searle, Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, pp. 1–29. (He criticizes Austin’s taxonomy of illocutionary acts and presents an alternative one.)
  • –––, 1975b, “Indirect speech acts,” in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press; reprinted in J. Searle, Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, pp. 30–57. (He presents indirect illocutionary acts as a particular case of non-literality.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989, “How performatives work,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 12: 535–58. (Scholar)
  • Soames, Scott, 1989, “Presupposition,” in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol IV: Topics in the philosophy of language, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 553–616. (Scholar)
  • Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson, 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell. (2nd revised edition, 1995) (Main presentation of Relevance Theory.) (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987, “Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10: 697–754. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading,” Mind and Language, 17: 3–23. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Pragmatics,” in F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 468–501. (Scholar)
  • Stalnaker, Robert, 1970, “Pragmatics,” Synthese 22. Also in Davidson and Harman (eds.) 1972, Semantics for Natural Language, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 380–97; reprinted in Kasher (ed.) 1998, Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, (6 vols.) London: Routledge, pp. 55–70. Also in Stalnaker 1999, ch. 1. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1970, “Assertion,” Syntax and Semantics, 9: 315–332; reprinted in Stalnaker 1999, ch. 4. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, Context and Content, Oxford: Oxford University press. (Scholar)
  • Stanley, Jason, 2000, “Context and logical form,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 23: 391–424. (Scholar)
  • Stanley, Jason and Zoltan G. Szabo, 2000, “On quantifier domain restriction,” Mind and Language, 15: 219–61. (Scholar)
  • Strawson, Peter F., 1964, “Intention and convention in speech acts,” The Philosophical Review, 73: 439–460; reprinted in Strawson 1971, pp. 149–69. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1971, Logico-linguistic Papers, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
  • Taylor, Kenneth, 2001, “Sex, Breakfast, and Descriptus Interruptus,” Synthese, 128: 45–6. (Scholar)
  • Travis, Charles, 1997, “Pragmatics,” in B. Hale and C. Wright (eds) 1997, A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 87–107. (Scholar)
  • Tsohatzidis Savas L., 1994, Foundations of Speech Acts, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber, 2012, Meaning and Relevance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)

Generated Wed May 27 01:46:03 2020