Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Preferences" by Sven Ove Hansson and Till Grüne-Yanoff

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Ainslie, George, 1992, Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States Within the Person, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Anand, Paul, 1993, “The Philosophy of Intransitive Preference”, Economic Journal, 103: 337–346. (Scholar)
  • Arrow, Kenneth J., 1963, Social Choice and Individual Values, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, first edition 1951. (Scholar)
  • Armstrong, Wallace E., 1939, “The Determinateness of the Utility Function”, Economic Journal, 49: 453–467. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1948, “Uncertainty and the Utility Function”, Economic Journal, 58: 1–10. (Scholar)
  • Aumann, Robert J., 1962, “Utility Theory Without the Completeness Axiom”, Econometrica, 30(3): 445–462. (Scholar)
  • Becker, Gary S. and Michael, Robert T., 1973, “On the New Theory of Consumer Behavior”, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976, 131–149. (Scholar)
  • Böckenholt, Ulf, 2002, “A Thurstonian Analysis of Preference Change”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46: 300–314. (Scholar)
  • Borjas, George J, 1992, “Ethnic Capital and Intergenerational Mobility,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1): 123–50. (Scholar)
  • Bradley, Richard, 2005, “Radical Probabilism and Mental Kinematics”, Philosophy of Science, 72: 342–364. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Conditional Desirability”, Theory and Decision, 47(1): 23–55. (Scholar)
  • Brandt, Richard B., 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “The Rational Criticism of Preferences”, in Preferences, C. Fehige and U. Wessels (eds.), Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 63–77. (Scholar)
  • Brogan, Albert P., 1919, “The Fundamental Value Universal”, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method, 16: 96–104. (Scholar)
  • Broome, John, 1993, “Can a Humean be moderate?”, in Value, Welfare and Morality, R. G. Frey and Christopher Morris (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 51–73. (Scholar)
  • Byrne, Alan and Alan Hájek, 1997, “David Hume, David Lewis, and Decision Theory”, Mind, 105: 422–428. (Scholar)
  • Cavalli-Sforza, L.Luca and M. W. Feldman, 1973, “Cultural Versus Biological Inheritance: Phenotypic Transmission from Parents to Children”, Human Genetics, 25: 618–637. (Scholar)
  • Chang, Ruth, ed., 1997, Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Chisholm, Roderick and Ernest Sosa, 1966, “On the Logic of Intrinsically Better” American Philosophical Quarterly, 3: 244–49. (Scholar)
  • Collins, John, 1988, “Belief, Desire, and Revision”, Mind, 97: 333–42. (Scholar)
  • Davidson, Donald, 1976, “Hempel on Explaining Action”, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980, 261–275. (Scholar)
  • Davidson, Donald, John McKinsey and Patrick Suppes, 1955, “Outlines of a formal theory of value, I”, Philosophy of Science, 22: 140–160. (Scholar)
  • Debreu, Gerard, 1954, “Representation of a Preference Ordering by a Numerical Function”, in Thrall et al. (eds.), Decision Processes, New York: John Wiley, 159–66. (Scholar)
  • Duesenberry, James S., 1949, Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Elster , 1979, Ulysses and the Sirens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1982, “Sour Grapes: Utilitarianism and the Genesis of Wants”, in Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 219–238. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, Ulysses Unbound, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Fishburn, Peter C., 1991, “Nontransitive additive conjoint measurement”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35: 1–40. (Scholar)
  • Frankfurt, Harry, 1971, “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”, Journal of Philosophy, 68: 5–20. (Scholar)
  • Friedman, Milton, 1953, “The Methodology of Positive Economics”, in Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Grüne-Yanoff, Till, 2004, “The problems of testing preference axioms with revealed preference theory”, Analyse & Kritik, 26(2): 382–397. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “Why don't you want to be rich? Preference explanations on the basis of causal structure”, in J.K. Campbell and M. O'Rourke (eds.), Topics in Contemporary Philosophy: Explanation and Causation, Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, and Edward McClennen, 2006, “Hume's Framework for a Natural History of the Passions”, in Margaret Schabas and Carl Wennerlind (eds.), Hume's Political Economy, London and New York: Routledge (Scholar)
  • Halldén, Sören, 1957, On the Logic of Better, Lund: Library of Theoria. (Scholar)
  • Hansson, Sven Ove, 1990, “Defining ‘good’ and ‘bad’ in terms of ‘better’”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 31: 136–149. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992a, “A Procedural Model of Voting”, Theory and Decision, 32: 269–301. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992b, “The Difference Model of Voting”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 33: 576–592. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993, “Money-Pumps, Self-Torturers and the Demons of Real Life”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71: 476–485. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995, “Changes in Preference”, Theory and Decision, 38: 1–28. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996a, “What is Ceteris Paribus Preference?”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25: 307–332.
  • –––, 1996b, “Decision-Making Under Great Uncertainty”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 26: 369–386.
  • –––, 1996c, “Social Choice With Procedural Preferences”, Social Choice and Welfare, 13: 215–230. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, The Structure of Values and Norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Herzberger, Hans G., 1973, “Ordinal Preference and Rational Choice”, Econometrica, 41/2: 187–237. (Scholar)
  • Hutcheson, Francis, 1726, An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises, ed. Wolfgang Leidhold, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004. (Scholar)
  • Iannaccone, Laurence R, 1990, “Religious Practice: A Human Capital Approach”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29: 297–314. (Scholar)
  • Jeffrey, Richard C, 1977, “A Note on the Kinematics of Preference”, Erkenntnis, 11: 135–141. (Scholar)
  • Joyce, James, 1999, Foundations of Causal Decision Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Krantz, David. H.,1991, “From Indices to Mappings: The Representational Approach to Measurement”, in D. R. Brown & J. E. K. Smith (eds.), Frontiers of Mathematical Psychology: Essays in honor of Clyde Coombs, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer Verlag. (Scholar)
  • Kusser, Anna, 1989, Dimensionen der Kritik von Wünschen, Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum. (Scholar)
  • Lancaster, Kevin J., 1966, “A New Approach to Consumer Theory”, Journal of Political Economy, 74: 132–57. (Scholar)
  • Leibenstein, Harvey, 1950, “Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumer Demand”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64: 183–207. (Scholar)
  • Levi, Isaac, 1986, Hard Choices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Lewis, David, 1988, “Desire as Belief”, Mind, 97: 323–332. (Scholar)
  • Loewenstein, George, 1996, “Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65: 272–92. (Scholar)
  • Loewenstein, G., Read, D. and Baumeister, R. eds, 2002, Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice, New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press. (Scholar)
  • Loomes, G. and R. Sugden. (1982). “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty”, The Economic Journal, 92: 805–824. (Scholar)
  • Luce, R. Duncan 1956, “Semiorders and a Theory of Utility Discrimination, Econometrica, 24: 178–191. (Scholar)
  • –––, and Krantz, DH, 1971, “Conditional Expected Utility”, Econometrica, 39: 253–271. (Scholar)
  • Millgram, Elijah, 1998, “Deciding to Desire”, in Preferences, C. Fehige and U. Wessels (eds.), Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 3–25. (Scholar)
  • Nozick, Robert, 1981, Philosophical Explanations, Cambridge: Belknap Press. (Scholar)
  • Parfit, Derek, 1984, Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Payne, John W., James R. Bettman and Eric J. Johnson, 1993, The Adaptive Decision Maker, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Pettit, Philip, 1991, “Decision Theory and Folk Psychology”, in Rules, Reasons, and Norms: Selected Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002, 192–221. (Scholar)
  • Pigou, Arthur, C., 1920, The Economics of Welfare, London: MacMillan & Co. (Scholar)
  • Pollack, Robert A., 1976, “Habit Formation and Long Run Utility Functions”, Journal of Economic Theory, 13: 272–297. (Scholar)
  • Quinn, Warren S., 1990, “The Puzzle of the Self-Torturer”, Philosophical Studies, 59: 79-90. (Scholar)
  • Ramsey, Frank P., 1928, “Truth and Probability”, in The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, ed. R. B. Braithwaite, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1928b, “A Mathematical Theory of Saving”, Economic Journal, 38: 543–59. (Scholar)
  • Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Rescher, Nicholas, 1967, “Semantic Foundations for the Logic of Preference”, in The Logic of Decision and Action, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
  • Russell, Bernard, 1992, The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Samuelson, Paul A., 1937, ”A Note on Measurement of Utility”, Review of Economic Studies, 4: 155–61. (Scholar)
  • Schelling, Thomas, C. 1984, “The Intimate Contest for Self-Command”, in Choice and Consequence: Perspectives of an Errant Economist, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 57–82. (Scholar)
  • Schumm, George F., 1987, “Transitivity, Preference and Indifference”, Philosophical Studies, 52: 435–437. (Scholar)
  • Schwartz, Thomas, 1972, “Rationality and the Myth of the Maximum”, Noûs, 6: 97–117. (Scholar)
  • Sen, Amartya, 1970a, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco: Holden Day, Inc.. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1970b, “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal”, Choice Welfare and Measurement, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982, 285–290. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1971, “Choice Functions and Revealed Preference”, Choice Welfare and Measurement, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982, 41–53. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1977, “Rational Fools“, Choice Welfare and Measurement, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982, 84–106. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993, “Internal Consistency of Choice”, Econometrica, 61(3): 495–521. (Scholar)
  • Smith, Michael, 1987, “The Humean Theory of Motivation”, Mind, 96: 36–61. (Scholar)
  • Simon, Herbert, 1957, Models of Man, John Wiley & Sons, New York. (Scholar)
  • Steedman, Ian and Ulrich Krause, 1986, “Goethe's Faust, Arrow's Possibility Theorem and the Individual Decision-Taker”, in Jon Elster (ed.), The Multiple Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–232. (Scholar)
  • Stigler, George J. and Gary S. Becker, 1977, “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum”, American Economic Review, 67: 76–90. (Scholar)
  • von Wright, Georg H., 1963, The Logic of Preference, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1972, “The Logic of Preference Reconsidered”, Theory and Decision, 3: 140–169. (Scholar)

Generated Thu Mar 23 00:15:33 2017