Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Presupposition" by David I. Beaver, Bart Geurts and Kristie Denlinger

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Abbott, Barbara, 2000, “Presuppositions as nonassertions”, Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10): 1419–1437. (Scholar)
  • Abbott, Barbara, 2008, “Issues in the semantics and pragmatics of definite descriptions in English”, in Reference: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, J.K. Gundel and N. Hedberg (eds.), Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Abbott, Barbara, 2006, “Where have some of the presuppositions gone?”, in Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, Betty Birner and Gregory Ward (eds.), Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
  • Abrusan, Marta, 2011a, "Predicting the presupposition of soft triggers", Linguistics and Philosophy, 34(6): 491–535. (Scholar)
  • Abrusan, Marta, 2011b, "A note on quasi-presupposition and focus", Journal of Semantics, 30(2), 257–265.
  • Abrusan, Marta, 2016, "Presupposition cancellation: explaining the ’soft-hard’ trigger distinction", Natural Language Semantics, 24(2): 165–202. (Scholar)
  • Abusch, Dorit, 2002, “Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presuppositions”, in Jackson, Brendan (ed.), Proceedings of SALT XII, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, 1–20. (Scholar)
  • Abusch, Dorit, 2010, "Factivity in exclamatives is a presupposition", Studia Linguistica, 64(1): 141–157. (Scholar)
  • Abusch, Dorit and Rooth, Mats, 2000, “Empty-domain effects for presuppositional and non-presuppositional determiners”, To appear in Hans Kamp and Barbara Partee (eds), Context Dependency in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning. (Scholar)
  • Atlas, Jay, 1976, On the Semantics of Presupposition and Negation: an Essay in Philosophical Logic and the Foundations of Linguistics, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University. (Scholar)
  • Atlas, Jay, 1977, “Negation, ambiguity and presupposition”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 1: 321–336. (Scholar)
  • Atlas, Jay, 1979, “How linguistics matters to philosophy: Presupposition, truth, and meaning”, in Oh, C. K. and Dineen, D. A. (eds.), Presupposition, New York: Academic Press, vol. 11 of Syntax and Semantics, 265–281. (Scholar)
  • Atlas, Jay and Levinson, Stephen, 1981, “It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical pragmatics”, in Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, 1–61. (Scholar)
  • Beaver, David, 1992, “The kinematics of presupposition”, in Dekker, P. and Stockhof, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, University of Amsterdam: ILLC, 17–36. (Scholar)
  • Beaver, David, 1997, “Presupposition”, in van Benthem, J. and ter Meulen, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 939–1008. (Scholar)
  • Beaver, David, 2001, Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [Available online] (Scholar)
  • Beaver, David, 2008, “As brief as possible (but no briefer)”, Theoretical Linguistics, 34: 213–228. (Scholar)
  • Beaver, D. (2010). "Have You Noticed that Your Belly Button Lint Color is Related to the Color of Your Clothing?", in R. Bauerle, U. Reyle, and T. Zimmermann (eds.) Presuppositions and discourse: Essays offered to Hans Kamp, Brill, 65–100. (Scholar)
  • Beaver, David and Condoravdi, Cleo, 2003, “A uniform analysis of ”before“ and ”after“”, in Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIII, Cornell, Ithaca: CLC Publications, 37–54.
  • Beaver, David and Denlinger, Kristin, 2020, "Negation and Presupposition", in Deprez, V. and Espinal, M. T. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Negation, 369–390. (Scholar)
  • Beaver, David and Krahmer, Emiel, 2001, “A partial account of presupposition projection”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10: 147–182.
  • Beaver, David and Zeevat, Henk, 2007, “Accommodation”, in Ramchand, G. and Reiss, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Oxford University Press, 533–538. (Scholar)
  • Blamey, Steven, 1989, “Partiality”, in Gabbay, D. and Guenther, F. (eds.), The Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Dordrecht: Reidel, vol. IV, 553–616. (Scholar)
  • Blutner, Reinhard, 2000, “Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation”, Journal of Semantics, 17(3): 189–216. (Scholar)
  • Bochvar, Dmitrii Anatoljevich, 1939, “Ob odnom trehznachom iscislenii i ego primeneii k analizu paradoksov klassicskogo rassirennogo funkcional ‘nogo iscislenija’”, Matematiciskij Sbornik, 4: 87–112. English Translation: History and Philosophy of Logic 2, 1981, “On a Three-valued Calculus and Its Applications to the Analysis of the Paradoxes of the Classical Extended Functional Calculus”. (Scholar)
  • Böer, Steven E. and Lycan, William G., 1976, “The myth of semantic presupposition”, in Zwicky, A. (ed.), Papers in nonphonology, Columbus, Ohio: Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, vol. 21 of Working Papers in Linguistics, 1–90. (Scholar)
  • Bridge, Derek, 1991, Computing Presuppositions in an Incremental Natural Language Processing System, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory. Available as Technical Report No. 237. (Scholar)
  • Chemla, Emmanuel, 2008, "An anti-introduction to presuppositions", in Proceedings of MIT-France workshop on scalar implicature and presupposition, 60. (Scholar)
  • Chemla, Emmanuel and Bott, Lewis, 2013, "Processing presuppositions: Dynamic semantics vs. pragmatic enrichment", Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3): 241–260. (Scholar)
  • Chierchia, Gennaro, 1995, Dynamics of Meaning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Clark, Herbert H. and Marshall, C., 1981, “Definite reference and mutual knowledge”, in Joshi, A. and Webber, B. L. and Sag, I. (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding, Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Cooper, Robin, 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
  • de Jong, Franciska and Verkuyl, Henk, 1985, “Generalized quantifiers: the properness of their strength”, in ter Meulen, A. and van Benthem, J. (eds.), Generalized Quantifiers: Theory and Applications, Dordrecht: Foris, vol. 4 of GRASS, 21–43. (Scholar)
  • Delin, Judy, 1995, “Presupposition and shared knowledge in it-clefts”, Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(2): 97–120. (Scholar)
  • van Eijck, Jan, 1993, “The dynamics of description”, Journal of Semantics, 10: 239–267. (Scholar)
  • van Eijck, Jan, 1994, “Presupposition failure: a comedy of errors”, Formal Aspects of Computing, 6(6): 766–787. (Scholar)
  • van Eijck, Jan, 1995, “Presuppositions and dynamic logic”, in Papers from the Second CSLI Workshop on Logic, Language and Computation, Makoto Kanazawa, Christopher Piñon, and Henriette de Swart (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Fauconnier, Gilles, 1985, Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Fillmore, Charles, 1971, “Verbs of judging: An exercise in semantic description”, in Fillmore, C. and Langendoen, D. T. (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, New York.: Holt, Reinhardt and Winston, 272–289. (Scholar)
  • von Fintel, Kai, 1995, Restrictions on Quantifier Domains, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachussetts at Amherst. (Scholar)
  • von Fintel, Kai, 2004, “Would you believe it? The king of France is back! Presuppositions and truth-value intuitions”, in Reimer, M. and Bezuidenhout, A. (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond, Oxford University Press, 269–296. (Scholar)
  • von Fintel, Kai, 2008, "What’s Presupposition Accommodation, Again?", Philosophical Perspectives, 22: 137–170. (Scholar)
  • Fraassen, Bas C. van, 1968, “Presupposition, implication, and self-reference”, The Journal of Philosophy, 65(5): 136–152. (Scholar)
  • Frege, Gottlob, 1892, “Uber Sinn und Bedeutung”, Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, C: 25–50. English Translation: “On Sense and Meaning”, in McGuinness, B. (ed), Frege: collected works, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 157–177. (Scholar)
  • Gamut, L. T. F., 1991, Logic, Language and Meaning, vol. 1, University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Gawron, Jean Mark, 1995, “Quantification, quantificational domains and dynamic logic”, in Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Shalom Lappin (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, 247–267. (Scholar)
  • Gazdar, Gerald, 1979a, Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Gazdar, Gerald, 1979b, “A solution to the projection problem”, in Oh, C.-K. and Dineen, D. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, New York: Academic Press, 57–89.
  • George, Benjamin R., 2008, Presupposition Repairs: a Static, Trivalent Approach to Predicting Projection, Master’s thesis, UCLA. (Scholar)
  • Geurts, Bart, 1996, “Local satisfaction guaranteed”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 19: 259–294. (Scholar)
  • Geurts, Bart, 1998, “Presuppositions and anaphors in attitude contexts”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 21: 545–601. (Scholar)
  • Geurts, Bart, 1999a, Presuppositions and Pronouns, vol. 3 of CRiSPI, Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Available online] (Scholar)
  • Geurts, Bart, 1999b, “Specifics”, in Geurts, B. and Krifka, M. and van der Sandt, R. (eds.), Focus and presupposition in multi-speaker discourse, Utrecht: ESSLLI 99, 99–129. (Scholar)
  • Geurts, Bart, 2000, “Buoyancy and strength”, Journal of Semantics, 17(4): 315–333. (Scholar)
  • Geurts, Bart, 2007, “Existential import”, in Comorovski, I. and von Heusinger, K. (eds.), Existence: syntax and semantics, Dordrecht: Springer, 253–271. (Scholar)
  • Geurts, Bart and van der Sandt, Rob, 1999, “Domain restriction”, in Bosch, P. and van der Sandt, R. (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 268–292. (Scholar)
  • Geurts, Bart and van der Sandt, Rob, 2004, “Interpreting focus”, Theoretical Linguistics, 30(1): 1–44. (Scholar)
  • Grice, H. Paul, 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Stokhof, Martin, 1991, “Dynamic Predicate Logic”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 39–100. (Scholar)
  • Gunji, Takao, 1981, Towards a Computational Theory of Pragmatics—Discourse, Presupposition and Implicature, Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University. (Scholar)
  • Hamblin, Charles L., 1970, Fallacies, London: Methuen & Co. (Scholar)
  • Hawkins, J.A., 1978, Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction, Croom Helm. (Scholar)
  • Heim, Irene, 1982, On the Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Scholar)
  • Heim, Irene, 1983, “On the projection problem for presuppositions”, in Barlow, M. and Flickinger, D. and Westcoat, M. (eds.), Second Annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford University, 114–126. (Scholar)
  • Heim, Irene, 1992, “Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs”, Journal of Semantics, 9: 183–221. (Scholar)
  • Heinämäki, Orvokki, 1974, Semantics of English Temporal Connectives, Ph.D. thesis, University of Indiana at Bloomington. (Scholar)
  • Horn, Laurence, 1969, “A presuppositional analysis of only and even”, in Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago, 98–107.
  • Horn, Laurence, 1972, On the semantic properties of logical operators in English, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles. (Scholar)
  • Horn, Laurence, 1985, “Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity”, Language, 61: 121–174. (Scholar)
  • Horn, Laurence, 1989, A Natural History of Negation, University of Chicago Press. Reissued with new introduction (2001), David Hume Series, CSLI Publications, Stanford. (Scholar)
  • Horton, Diane, 1987, “Incorporating agents’ beliefs in a model of presupposition”, Tech. Rep. CSRI-201, Computer Systems Research Institute, University of Toronto. (Scholar)
  • Horton, Diane and Hirst, Graeme, 1988, “Presuppositions as beliefs”, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING, 255–260. (Scholar)
  • Jackendoff, Ray, 1972, Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Jayez, Jacques, Mongelli, Valeria, Reboul, Anne and Van Der Henst, Jean-Bapteiste, 2014 "Weak and strong triggers", in Experimental perspectives on presuppositions, Cham: Springer, 173–193. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, Lauri, 1971a, “Implicative verbs”, Language, 47(2): 340–358. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, Lauri, 1971b, “Some Observations on Factivity”, Papers in Linguistics, 5: 55–69. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, Lauri, 1973, “Presuppositions of Compound Sentences”, Linguistic Inquiry, 4: 167–193. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, Lauri, 1974, “Presuppositions and Linguistic Context”, Theoretical Linguistics, 1: 181–194. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, Lauri and Peters, Stanley, 1977, “Requiem for presupposition”, in BLS3, Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley: California: 266–278. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, Lauri and Peters, Stanley, 1979, “Conventional Implicatures in Montague Grammar”, in Oh, C.-K. and Dineen, D. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, New York: Academic Press, 1–56. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, Lauri, 2016, "Presupposition: What went wrong?", in Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 26: 705–731. (Scholar)
  • Kay, Paul, 1992, “The inheritance of presuppositions”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 15: 333–381. (Scholar)
  • Kempson, Ruth, 1975, Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kim, Christina, 2008, "Processing presupposition: verifying sentences with ‘only’", University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 14(1): 17. (Scholar)
  • Kiparsky, Paul and Kiparsky, Carol, 1970, “Fact”, in Bierwisch, M. and Heidolph, K. (eds.), Progress in Linguistics, The Hague: Mouton, 143–173. (Scholar)
  • Kleene, Stephen, 1952, Introduction to Metamathematics, Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Scholar)
  • Krahmer, Emiel, 1994, “Partiality and dynamics”, in Dekker, P. and Stokhof, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium: Volume 2, University of Amsterdam: ILLC, 391–410. (Scholar)
  • Krahmer, Emiel, 1998, Presupposition and Anaphora, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Kripke, Saul, 2009, “Presupposition and anaphora: Remarks on the formulation of the projection problem”, Linguistic Inquiry, 40: 367–386. (Scholar)
  • Langendoen, D. Terence and Savin, Harris, 1971, “The projection problem for presuppositions”, in Fillmore, C. and Langendoen, D. T. (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, New York: Holt, Reinhardt and Winston, 373–388. (Scholar)
  • Lappin, Shalom and Reinhart, Tanya, 1988, “Presuppositions of quantifiers: a processing account”, Linguistics, 26: 1021–1037. (Scholar)
  • Lewis, David, 1979, “Scorekeeping in a language game”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 339–359. Also in Bäuerle, R. and Egli, U. and von Stechow, A. (eds.), 1979, Semantics from Different Points of View, Springer, Berlin. (Scholar)
  • Lorenz, Sven, 1992, “On the role of reasoning about change in the projection of presuppositions”, Report 234, IWBS, IBM Germany. (Scholar)
  • Mandelkern, Matthew, 2016, "A note on the architecture of presupposition", Semantics and Pragmatics, 9(13): 1–24.
  • Marcu, Daniel, 1994, A Formalisation and an Algorithm for Computing Pragmatic Inferences and Detecting Infelicities, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Computer Systems Research Institute. Available as Technical Report CSRI-309, Computer Research Institute, University of Toronto. (Scholar)
  • McCawley, James, 1981, Everything That Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic (but Were Ashamed to Ask), University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Mercer, Robert, 1987, A Default Logic Approach to the Derivation of Natural Language Presuppositions, Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia. (Scholar)
  • Mercer, Robert, 1992, “Default Logic: Towards a common logical semantics for presupposition and entailment”, Journal of Semantics, 9: 223–250. (Scholar)
  • Morgan, Jerry, 1969, “On the Treatment of Presupposition in Transformational Grammar”, in Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, 167–77. (Scholar)
  • Nerlich, G., 1967, “Presupposition and Classical Logical Relations”, Analysis, 27(3): 104–106. (Scholar)
  • Pearson, Hazel, 2013, "A Judge-Free Semantics for Predicates of Personal Taste", Journal of Semantics, 30: 103–154. (Scholar)
  • Peters, Stanley, 1979, “A truth-conditional formulation of Karttunen’s account of presupposition”, Synthese, 40(2): 301–316. (Scholar)
  • Percus, Orin, 2006, "Antipresuppositions", in A. Ueyama (ed.) Theoretical and empirical studies of reference and anaphora, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science: Report of the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research B. (Scholar)
  • Potts, Christopher, 2005, The logic of conventional implicatures, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Prince, Ellen, 1986, “On the syntactic marking of presupposed open propositions”, in Farley, A. M. and Farley, P. T. and McCullough, K.-E. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, 22nd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, 208–222. (Scholar)
  • Reinhart, Tanya, 1982, “Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics”, Philosophica, 27: 53–94. (Scholar)
  • Roberts, Craige, 1995, “Domain Selection in Dynamic Semantics”, in Bach, E. Jelinek, E. and Kratzer, A. and Partee, B. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 661–700. (Scholar)
  • Roberts, Craige, 1998, “Focus, the flow of information, and universal grammar”, in Culicover, P. and McNally, L. (eds.), The Limits of Syntax, New York: Academic Press, 109–160. (Scholar)
  • Roberts, Craige., 2012, "Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics", Semantics and Pragmatics, 5: 1–69. (Scholar)
  • Romoli, Jacopo, 2011, "The presuppositions of soft triggers aren’t presuppositions", Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 21: 236–256. (Scholar)
  • Romoli, Jacopo, 2014, "The presuppositions of soft triggers are obligatory scalar implicatures", Journal of Semantics, 32(2): 173–219. (Scholar)
  • Romoli, Jacopo, Sudo, Yasutada and Snedeker, Jesse, 2011, "An experimental investigation of presupposition projection in conditional sentences", Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 21: 592–608. (Scholar)
  • Romoli, Jacopo & Schwarz, Florian (2014), "An experimental comparison between presuppositions and indirect scalar implicatures", in F. Schwarz (ed.), Experimental Perspectives on Presuppositions, Cham: Springer, 215–240. (Scholar)
  • van Rooij, Robert, 2007, “Strengthening conditional presuppositions”, Journal of Semantics, 24: 289–304. (Scholar)
  • Rothschild, Daniel, 2008, “Presupposition projection and logical equivalence”, Philosophical Perspectives, 22(1): 473–497. (Scholar)
  • Russell, Bertrand, 1905, “On Denoting”, Mind, 14: 479–493. (Scholar)
  • Sæbø, Kjell Johan, 1996, “Anaphoric presuppositions and zero anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 19: 187–209. (Scholar)
  • van der Sandt, Rob, 1982, Kontekst en Presuppositie: Een Studie van het Projektieprobleem en de Presuppositionele Eigenschappen van de Logische Konnektieven, Ph.D. thesis, Nijmegen Institute of Semantics. (Scholar)
  • van der Sandt, Rob, 1988, Context and Presupposition, London: Croom Helm. (Scholar)
  • van der Sandt, Rob, 1989, “Presupposition and discourse structure”, in Bartsch, R. van Benthem, J. and van Emde Boas, P. (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression, Dordrecht: Foris, 287–94. (Scholar)
  • van der Sandt, Rob, 1992, “Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution”, Journal of Semantics, 9: 333–377. (Scholar)
  • Schlenker, Philippe, 2007, “Anti-dynamics: Presupposition projection without dynamic semantics”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 16(3): 325–256. (Scholar)
  • Schlenker, Philippe, 2008, “Be articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition”, Theoretical Linguistics, 34: 157–212. (Scholar)
  • Schlenker, Philippe, 2009, “Local contexts”, Semantics and Pragmatics, 2(3): 1–78. (Scholar)
  • Schlenker, Philippe, 2011, "The proviso problem: a note", Natural Language Semantics, 19(4): 395–422. (Scholar)
  • Schlenker, Philippe, 2015, "Gestural presuppositions", Snippets, 30: 9–11. (Scholar)
  • Schlenker, Philippe, 2018, "Gesture projection and cosuppositions", Linguistics and Philosophy, 41: 295–365. (Scholar)
  • Schwarz, Florian (ed.), 2014, Experimental perspectives on presuppositions, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Sellars, W., 1954, “Presupposing”, Philosophical Review, 63: 197–215. (Scholar)
  • Simons, Mandy, 2001, “On the conversational basis of some presuppositions”, in Hastings, R. and Jackson, B. and Zvolensky, Z. (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistics Theory 11, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, 431–448. (Scholar)
  • Simons, Mandy, 2003, “Presupposition and accommodation: Understanding the Stalnakerian picture”, Philosophical Studies, 112(3): 251–278. (Scholar)
  • Simons, Mandy, 2004, “Presupposition and relevance”, in Zoltán Szabó (ed.), Semantics vs. Pragmatics, Oxford University Press, 329–355. (Scholar)
  • Simons, Mandy, 2006, “Foundational issues in presupposition”, Philosophy Compass, 1(4): 357–372. (Scholar)
  • Simons, Mandy, 2007, “Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition”, Lingua, 117(6): 1034–1056. (Scholar)
  • Simons, Mandy, Tonhauser, Judith, Beaver, David and Roberts, Craige, 2010, "What projects and why", Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 20: 309–327. (Scholar)
  • Singh, Raj, 2007a, “Formal alternatives as a solution to the proviso problem”, in Gibson, M. and Friedman, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University, 264–228. (Scholar)
  • Singh, Raj, 2009, "Symmetric and interacting alternatives for implicature and accommodation", in N. Klinedinst and D. Rothschild (eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2009 Workshop: New directions in the theory of presupposition. (Scholar)
  • Soames, Scott, 1979, “A projection problem for speaker presuppositions”, Linguistic Inquiry, 10: 623–666.
  • Soames, Scott, 1982, “How presuppositions are inherited: a solution to the projection problem”, Linguistic Inquiry, 13: 483–545. (Scholar)
  • Soames, Scott, 1989, “Presupposition”, in Gabbay, D. and Guenther, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Dordrecht: Reidel, vol. IV, 553–616. (Scholar)
  • Stalnaker, Robert, 1972, “Pragmatics”, in Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel: Dordrecht, 389–408. (Scholar)
  • Stalnaker, Robert, 1973, “Presuppositions”, The Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2: 447–457. (Scholar)
  • Stalnaker, Robert, 1974, “Pragmatic presuppositions”, in Munitz, M. and Unger, P. (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, New York University Press, 197–214. (Scholar)
  • Stalnaker, Robert, 1998, “On the representation of context”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 7: 3–19. (Scholar)
  • Strawson, Peter F., 1950, “On referring”, Mind, 59: 320–44. (Scholar)
  • Strawson, Peter F., 1952, Introduction to Logical Theory, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
  • Strawson, Peter F., 1954, “A Reply to Mr. Sellars”, Philosophical Review, 63: 216–231. (Scholar)
  • Strawson, Peter F., 1964, “Identifying reference and truth-values”, Theoria, 30: 96–118. Reprinted in: Logico-linguistic Papers. Methuen, London, 1974, 75–95. (Scholar)
  • Tiemann, Sonja, Schmid, Mareike, Bade, Nadine, Rolke, Bettina, Hertrich, Ingo, Ackermann, Hermann, Knapp, Julia, and Beck, Sigrid, 2011, "Psycholinguistic evidence for presuppositions: On-line and off-line data", in Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung, 15(15): 581–595. (Scholar)
  • Tonhauser, Judith, 2012, "Diagnosing (not-) at-issue content", Proceedings of Semantics of Under-represented Languages of the Americas (SULA), 6: 239–254 (Scholar)
  • Tonhauser, Judith, Beaver, David, Roberts, Craig, and Simons, Mandy, 2013, "Toward a taxonomy of projective content", Language, 89(1): 66–109. (Scholar)
  • Thomason, Richmond, 1972, “A semantic theory of sortal incorrectness”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1: 209–258.
  • Veltman, Frank, 1996, “Defaults in update semantics”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25: 221–261. (Scholar)
  • Wilson, Deidre, 1975, Presupposition and Non-truth-conditional Semantics, London: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Yeom, J.I., 1998, A Presuppositional Analysis of Specific Indefinites: Common Grounds as Structured Information States, Garland Publishing. (Scholar)
  • Zeevat, H., 1999, “Explaining presupposition triggers”, in Proceedings of the Twelfth Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, Amsterdam, 19–24. (Scholar)
  • Zeevat, Henk, 1992, “Presupposition and accommodation in update semantics”, Journal of Semantics, 9: 379–412. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Jan 24 08:59:02 2022