Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Principle of Beneficence in Applied Ethics" by Tom Beauchamp
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Adler, Matthew D., 2012, Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Adler, Matthew D. and Marc Fleurbaey (eds.), 2016, Oxford
Handbook of Wellbeing and Public Policy, New York: Oxford
University Press. (Scholar)
- Arneson, Richard J., 2004, “Moral Limits on the Demands of
Beneficence?” In The Ethics of Assistance, Deen K.
Chatterjee (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Beauchamp, Tom L., and Childress, James F., 2019, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 8th edition, New York: Oxford University Press, Chapter 6. (Scholar)
- Braybrooke, David, 2003, “A Progressive Approach to Personal Responsibility for Global Beneficence,” The Monist, 86: 301–22. (Scholar)
- Cullity, Garrett, 2007, “Beneficence.” In R. E. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper, and J. R. McMillan (eds.), Principles of Health Care Ethics (2nd ed.), pp. 19–26, Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, The Moral Demands of Affluence, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Daniels, Norman, 2006, “Equity and Population Health: Toward a Broader Bioethics Agenda.” Hastings Center Report, 36: 22–35. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Is There a Right to Health Care and, if so, What does it Encompass?” In H. Kuhse and P. Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 316–28. (Scholar)
- Donaldson, Thomas J., and Preston, L. E., 1995, “The
Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and
Implications,”Academy of Management Review, 20:
65–91. (Scholar)
- Dworkin, Gerald, “Paternalism,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL Paternalism/>. (Scholar)
- Egonsson, Dan, 1999, “Local Solidarity,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2: 149–58. (Scholar)
- Epstein, Richard A., 2018,
“Libertarian Paternalism Is a Nice Phrase for Controlling People,”
The Federalist, available at
http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/26/libertarian-paternalism-nice-phrase-controlling-people/
(accessed August 18, 2018), an article reprinted from Defining
Ideas, a Hoover Institution Journal. (Scholar)
- Feinberg, Joel, 1988, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, 4 volumes, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Fishkin, James A, 1982, The Limits of Obligation, New
Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Fletcher, Guy, 2016, The Philosophy of Well-being: An Introduction, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Freeman, R. Edward, 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder
Approach, Boston: Pitman. (Scholar)
- Gert, Bernard, 2007, Common Morality: Deciding What to Do,
New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, Morality: Its Nature and Justification, 2nd rev. ed., New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Gert, Bernard, Charles M. Culver, and K. Danner Clouser, 2006, Bioethics: A Systematic Approach, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Gert, Bernard and Joshua Gert, “The Definition of Morality,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL . (Scholar)
- Griffin, James, 1986, Well-Being, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hooker, Brad, 2009, “The Demandingness Objection,” in Timothy Chappell, ed., The Problem of Moral Demandingness (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2009), pp. 148–162 . (Scholar)
- Hassoun, Nicole, 2012, Globalization and Global Justice: Shrinking Distance, Expanding Obligations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Hume, David, 1751, An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
- Hutcheson, Francis, Collected Works of Francis Hutcheson,
7 vols., facsimile ed. by Bernhard Fabian. Hildesheim: Olms,
1969–71.
- Hurley, Paul, 2003, “Fairness and Beneficence,” Ethics, 113: 841–864. (Scholar)
- Kant, Immanuel, Ethical Philosophy, second edition, James
W. Ellington (trans.), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1994.
- Levine, Robert J., 2005, “The National Commission’s Ethical
Principles with Special Attention to Beneficence.” In J. F.
Childress, E. M. Meslin, and H. T. Shapiro (eds.), Belmont
Revisited: Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects,
pp. 126–135, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
- Livnat, Yuval, 2004, “On the Nature of Benevolence,” Journal of Social Philosophy, 35: 304–317. (Scholar)
- Mack, Eric, 2002, “Equality, Benevolence, and Responsiveness to Agent-Relative Value,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 19: 314–341. (Scholar)
- Mandeville, Bernard de, 1714, The Fable of the Bees: OR,
Private Vices, Publick Benefits, ed. F. B. Kaye, 2 vols. Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1924; repr. Indianapolis: LibertyClassics, 1988. (Scholar)
- Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism and On Liberty.
In the Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Toronto:
University of Toronto Press, 1969.
- Miller, Richard W., 2004, “Beneficence, Duty, and Distance,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32: 357–83.. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, Globalizing Justice: The Ethics of Poverty and Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Murphy, Liam B., 1993, “The Demands of Beneficence,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22: 267–92. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Nagel, T., 2005, “The Problem of Global Justice,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33: 113–147. (Scholar)
- Narveson, Jan, 2003, “We Don’t Owe Them a Thing! A
Tough-Minded but Soft-Hearted View of Aid to the Faraway Needy,”
The Monist, 86: 419–33. (Scholar)
- Nathanson, Stephen, 1997, “Nationalism and the Limits of
Global Humanism,” in Robert McKim and Jeff McMahan
(eds.), The Morality of Nationalism, New York: Oxford
University Press, pp. 176–187. (Scholar)
- National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of
Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1978, The Belmont Report:
Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects
of Research. Washington, DC: DHEW Publication OS
78-0012. (Scholar)
- Nussbaum, Martha C., and Amartya Sen (eds.), 1993, The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Pellegrino, Edmund D., and David C. Thomasma, 1987, “The
Conflict between Autonomy and Beneficence in Medical Ethics: Proposal
for a Resolution,” Journal of Contemporary Health Law &
Policy, 3, available at
http://scholarship.law.edu/jchlp/vol3/iss1/7 (accessed August 20,
2018). (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, For the Patient’s
Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care, New York:
Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987,
“The Conflict between Autonomy and Beneficence in Medical Ethics:
Proposal for a Resolution,” Journal of Contemporary Health
Law & Policy, 3, available at
http://scholarship.law.edu/jchlp/vol3/iss1/7 (accessed August 20,
2018). (Scholar)
- Pellegrino, Edmund, 1994, “The Four Principles and The
Doctor-Patient Relationship: The Need For A Better Linkage.” In
Principles of Health Care Ethics, R. Gillon (ed.),
1st ed. London: John Wiley & Sons. (Scholar)
- Powers, Madison, and Ruth R. Faden, 2006, Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2019, Structural Injustice: Power, Advantage, and Human Rights, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Richardson, Henry S., 2012, Moral Entanglements: The Ancillary-Care Obligations of Medical Researchers, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Sen, Amartya, 1992, Inequality Reexamined, Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, “Capability and
Well-Being.” In The Quality of Life, M. C. Nussbaum and
A. K. Sen (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 30–53. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Singer, Peter, 1972, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1: 229–43. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993,
Practical Ethics, 2d edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, One World: The Ethics of Globalization, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty, New York: Random House. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism is Changing Ideas about Living Ethically, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Slote, Michael A., 1977, “The Morality of Wealth.” In
World Hunger and Moral Obligation, W. Aiken and H. LaFollette
(eds.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 124–47. (Scholar)
- Smith, Adam, 1776, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the
Wealth of Nations, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976. (Scholar)
- Sunstein, Cass R., and Richard H.
Thaler, 2003, “Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron,”
University of Chicago Law Review, 70: 1159–1202. (Scholar)
- Sunstein, Cass R., 2014, Why Nudge? The Politics of Libertarian
Paternalism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein, 2003, “Libertarian
Paternalism,” American Economics Review, 93:
175–79. (Scholar)
- –––, Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein,
2008, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and
Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Unger, Peter, 1996. Living High and Letting Die, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- U. S. Supreme Court, 2006, Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S.
243. (Scholar)