Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" by Jan Faye

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

References to Work by Bohr

CW Bohr, N. (1972–2006), Collected Works, Vol. 1–12, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
ATDN Bohr, N. (1934/1987), Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature, reprinted as The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. I, Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
APHK Bohr, N. (1958/1987), Essays 1932–1957 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, reprinted as The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. II, Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
Essays Bohr, N. (1963/1987), Essays 1958–1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, reprinted as The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. III, Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
CC Bohr, N. (1998), Causality and Complementarity, supplementary papers edited by Jan Faye and Henry Folse as The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. IV, Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.

Other References

  • Bacciagaluppi, G., 2016, “The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Fall 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/qm-decoherence/>. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, “An Everett Perspective on Bohr and EPR”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 289–302. (Scholar)
  • Barad, K., 2007, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Durham University Press. (Scholar)
  • Beller, M., 1992, “The Birth of Bohr’s Complementarity: The Context and the Dialogues”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 23: 147–180. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Bitbol, M., 2013, “Bohr’s complementarity and Kant’s epistemology”, in Séminaire Poincaré 17: 145–166. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, “On Bohr’s Transcendental Research Program”, in Faye and Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, pp. 47–66. (Scholar)
  • Brock, S., 2003, Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Quantum Physics in the Light of the Helmholtzian Tradition of Theoretical Physics, Berlin: Logos Verlag. (Scholar)
  • Bub, J. and R. Clifton, 1996, “The uniqueness theorem for ‘no collapse’ interpretations of quantum mechanics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 27(2): 181–219. (Scholar)
  • Bunge, M., 1967, “The Turn of the Tide”, in Mario Bunge (ed.) Quantum Theory and Reality, New York: Springer, pp. 1–12. (Scholar)
  • Bächtold, M., 2017, “On Bohr’s Epistemological Contribution to the Quantum-Classical Cut Problems”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 235–252. (Scholar)
  • Camilleri, K., 2006, “Heisenberg and the Wave-particle Duality”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37: 298–315. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Bohr, Heisenberg and the Divergent Views of Complementarity”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 514–528. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, “Why Do We Find Bohr Obscure? Reading Bohr as a Philosopher of Experiment”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.) Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 19–48. (Scholar)
  • Camilleri, K. and M. Schlosshauer, 2015, “Niels Bohr as philosopher of experiment: Does decoherence theory challenge Bohr’s doctrine of classical concepts?”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 49: 73–83. (Scholar)
  • Chevalley, C., 1991, “Introduction: Le dessin et la couleur”, in Niels Bohr, Physique atomique et connaissance humaine, Edmond Bauer and Roland Omnès (trans.), Catherine Chevalley (ed.), Paris: Gallimard, pp. 17–140. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Niels Bohr’s Words and the Atlantis of Kantianism”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 33–55. (Scholar)
  • Christiansen, F. V., 2006, “Heinrich Hertz’ neo-Kantian philosophy of science, and its development by Harald Høffding”, in Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 37: 1–20. (Scholar)
  • Clifton, R. and H. Halvorson, 1999, “Maximal Beable Subalgebras of Quantum Mechanical Observables”, in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38: 2441–2484. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “Reconsidering Bohr’s reply to EPR”, in Placek, T. and J. Butterfield (eds.) Non-locality and Modality, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. (Scholar)
  • Cuffaro, M., 2010, “The Kantian framework of complementarity ”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 309–317. (Scholar)
  • Cushing, J., 1994,Quantum Mechanics, Historical Contingency, and the Copenhagen Hegemony, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Dickson, M., 2001, “The EPR Experiment: A Prelude to Bohr’s Reply to EPR”, in Heidelberger, M. & F. Stadler (eds.), History of Philosophy of Science — New Trends and Perspectives, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 263–275. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “Bohr on Bell: A Proposed Reading of Bohr and Its Implications for Bell’s Theorem”, in T. Placek and J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, (Scholar)
  • Dieks, D., 2017, “Niels Bohr and the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 303–334. (Scholar)
  • Dorato, M., 2017, “Bohr’s Relational Holism and the Classical-Quantum Interaction”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 133–154. (Scholar)
  • Einstein, A., B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, 1935, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?”, Physical Review, 47: 777–780. (Scholar)
  • Favrholdt, D., 1994, “Niels Bohr and Realism”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 77–96. (Scholar)
  • Faye, J., 1991, Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy. An Antirealist View of Quantum Mechanics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Non-Locality or Non-Separability? A Defense of Bohr’s Anti-Realist Approach to Quantum Mechanics”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 97–118. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, “Niels Bohr and the Vienna Circle”, in Manninen, J. and F. Stadler (eds.) The Vienna Circle in the Nordic Countries (The Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, 14), Dordrecht: Springer Verlag. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, “Complementarity and Human Nature”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.) Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics., London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 115–132. (Scholar)
  • Faye, J., and H. Folse (eds.), 1994, Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Volume 158), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. (Scholar)
  • Faye, J., and H. Folse (eds.), 2017, Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics. Twenty-First-Century Perspectives, London: Bloomsbury Academic. (Scholar)
  • Feyerabend, P., 1968, “On a recent critique of complementarity I.”, Philosophy of Science, 35: 309–331. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1969, “On a recent critique of complementarity II”, Philosophy of Science, 36: 82–105. (Scholar)
  • Folse, H., 1978, “Kantian Aspects of Complementarity”, Kantstudien, 69: 58–65. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985, The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity, Amsterdam: North Holland. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1986, “Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism”, in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds), PSA 1986: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Volume I), East Lansing: PSA, pp. 96–104. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Bohr’s Framework of Complementarity and the Realism Debate”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 119–139. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, “Complementarity and Pragmatic Epistemology. A Comparison of Bohr and C.I. Lewis ”, in Faye and Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 91–115. (Scholar)
  • Gomatam, R., 2007, “Niels Bohr’s Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation — Are the two incompatible?”, in Philosophy of Science, 74(5): 736–748. (Scholar)
  • Halvorson, H., 2004, “Complementarity of Representations in Quantum Mechanics”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35: 45–56. (Scholar)
  • Hebor, J., 2005, The Standard Conception as Genuine Quantum Realism, Odense: The University Press of Southern Denmark. (Scholar)
  • Heisenberg, W., 1955, “The Development of the Interpretation of the Quantum Theory”, in W. Pauli (ed), Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, London: Pergamon pp. 12–29. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1958, Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science, London: George Allen & Unwin. (Scholar)
  • Held, C., 1994, “The Meaning of Complementarity”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 25: 871–893. (Scholar)
  • Henderson, J. R., 2010, “Classes of Copenhagen interpretations: Mechanisms of collapse as a typologically determinative”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41: 1–8. (Scholar)
  • Honner, J., 1982, “The transcendental philosophy of Niels Bohr”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 13: 1–29. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987, The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and The Philosophy of Quantum Physics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Description and Deconstruction: Niels Bohr and Modern Philosophy”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 141–154. (Scholar)
  • Hooker, C. A., 1972, “The Nature of Quantum Mechanical Reality”, in R. G. Colodny (ed.), Paradigms and Paradoxes, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 67–305. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Bohr and the Crisis of empirical intelligibility”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 155–199. (Scholar)
  • Howard, D., 1994, “What Makes a Classical Concept Classical? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 201–229. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Who Invented the ‘Copenhagen Interpretation?’ A Study in Mythology”, Philosophy of Science, 71: 669–682. (Scholar)
  • Kaiser, D., 1992, “More Roots of Complementarity: Kantian Aspects and Influences”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 23: 213–239. (Scholar)
  • Katsumori, M., 2011, Niels Bohr’s Complementarity. Its Structure, History, and Intersections with Hermeneutics and Deconstruction, (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Volume 286), Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Kauark-Leite, P., 2017, “Transcendental versus Quantitative Meaning of Bohr’s Complementarity Principle”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 67–90. (Scholar)
  • Landsman, N.P., 2006,“When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr-Einstein debate.”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37: 212–242. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Between classical and quantum”, in Handbook of Philosophy of Science (Volume 2: Philosophy of Physics), J. Earman & J. Butterfield (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 415–555. (Scholar)
  • MacKinnon, E., 1994, “Bohr and the Realism Debates”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 279–302. (Scholar)
  • Massimi, M., 2005, Pauli’s Exclusion Principle. The Origin and Validation of a Scientific Principle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Murdoch, D., 1987, Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Perovic, S., 2013, “Emergence of Complementarity and the Baconian roots of Niels Bohr’s Method”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44(3): 162–173. (Scholar)
  • Petruccioli, S., 1993, Atoms, Metaphors and Paradoxes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Plotnitsky, A., 1994, Complementarity: Anti-Epistemology after Bohr and Derrida, Durham: Duke University Press. (Scholar)
  • Popper, K. R., 1967, “Quantum Mechanics Without the ‘Observer’”, in Mario Bunge (ed.), Quantum Theory and Reality, New York: Springer, pp. 1–12. (Scholar)
  • Pringe, H., 2009, “A transcendental account of correspondence and complementarity”, in M. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg and J. Petitot (eds.), Constituting Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 317–323.
  • Rosenfeld, L., 1961 [1979], “Foundations of Quantum Theory and Complementarity”, in R. S. Cohen and J. J. Stachel (eds.) Selected Papers of Léon Rosenfeld, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp, 503–516. (Scholar)
  • Schlosshauer, M. and Camilleri, K., 2011, “What classicality? Decoherence and Bohr’s classical concepts”, in Advances in Quantum Theory (American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 1327), Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics, pp. 26–35. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, “Bohr and the Problem of the Quantum-to-Classical Transition”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and and the Philosophy of Physics, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 223–234. (Scholar)
  • Shomar, T., 2008, “Bohr as a Phenomenological Realist”, in Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 39: 321– 349. (Scholar)
  • Tanona, S., 2004a, “Uncertainty in Bohr’s Response to the Heisenberg Microscope”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35: 483–507. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004b, “Idealization and Formalism in Bohr’s Approach to Quantum Theory”, in Philosophy of Science, 71: 683–695. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Decoherence and the Copenhagen Cut”, in Synthese, 190(16): 3625–3649. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, “Individuality and Correspondence”, in J. Faye and H. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 253–288. (Scholar)
  • Whitaker, M.A.B., 2004, “The EPR Paper and Bohr’s Response: A Reassessment”, in Foundation of Physics, 34: 1305–1340. (Scholar)
  • Wigner, E., 1967, Symmetries and Reflections. Scientific Essays, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
  • von Neumann, J., 1932 [1996], Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, R.T. Beyer (trans.), Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • von Weizsäcker, C. F., 1966 [1994], “Kant’s Theory of Natural Science according to P. Plaass”, in P. Plaass, Kant’s Theory of Natural Science, A. E. Miller and M. G. Miller (trans.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 167–187. (Scholar)
  • Zinkernagel, H., 2011, “Some Trends in the Philosophy of Physics”, in Teoria, 26(2): 215–241. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, “Are we living in a quantum world? Bohr and quantum fundamentalism”, in F. Aaserud and H. Kragh (eds.), One hundred years of the Bohr atom: Proceedings from a conference (Scientia Danica. Series M: Mathematica et physica, Volume 1), Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, pp. 419–434. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2016, “Niels Bohr on the wave function and the classical/quantum divided”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 53: 9–19. (Scholar)

Generated Fri Aug 14 05:34:34 2020