Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics" by Guido Bacciagaluppi
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Adler, S. L., 2003, ‘Why Decoherence has not Solved the Measurement Problem: A Response to P. W. Anderson’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34B: 135–142. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Albert, D., 1992, Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Albert, D., and Loewer, B., 1988, ‘Interpreting the Many Worlds Interpretation’, Synthese, 77: 195–213. (Scholar)
- Allori, V., 2001, Decoherence and the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics, Ph.D. Thesis, Università di Genova, Dipartimento di Fisica. (Scholar)
- Allori, V., and Zanghì, N., 2009, ‘On the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics’, Foundations of Physics, 39(1): 20–32. (Scholar)
- Anglin, J. R., Paz, J. P., and Zurek, W. H., 1997, ‘Deconstructing Decoherence’, Physical Review, A 55: 4041–4053. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Appleby, D. M., 1999, ‘Bohmian Trajectories Post-Decoherence’, Foundations of Physics, 29: 1885–1916. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Bacciagaluppi, G., 2000, ‘Delocalized Properties in the Modal Interpretation of a Continuous Model of Decoherence’, Foundations of Physics, 30: 1431–1444. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, ‘Remarks on Space-Time and Locality in Everett's Interpretation’, in T. Placek and J. Butterfield (eds), Non-Locality and Modality (NATO Science Series, II. Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, Volume 64), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 105–122. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, ‘Probability, Arrow of Time and Decoherence’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 439–456. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Barbour, J., 1999, The End of Time (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson). (Scholar)
- Barrett, J. A., 2000, ‘The Persistence of Memory: Surreal Trajectories in Bohm's Theory’, Philosophy of Science, 67(4): 680–703. (Scholar)
- Bell, J. S., 1987, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Bene, G., and Dieks, D., 2002, ‘A Perspectival Version of the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Origin of Macroscopic Behavior’, Foundations of Physics, 32: 645–672. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Berkovitz, J., and Hemmo, M., 2006, ‘Modal Interpretations and Relativity: A Reconsideration’, in W. Demopoulos and I. Pitowsky (eds.), Physical Theory and its Interpretation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Bub (Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 72), New York: Springer, pp. 1–28. (Scholar)
- Broglie, L. de, 1928, ‘La nouvelle dynamique des quanta’, in [H. Lorentz (ed.)], Électrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique […] Solvay, Paris: Gauthiers-Villars. Transl. as ‘The New Dynamics of Quanta’ in G. Bacciagaluppi and A. Valentini, Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 374–407. (Scholar)
- Bohm, D., 1952, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables: I and II’, Physical Review, 85: 166–179 and 180–193. (Scholar)
- Bohm, D., and Hiley, B., 1993, The Undivided Universe, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Bub, J., 1997, Interpreting the Quantum World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; corrected edition, 1999. (Scholar)
- Deutsch, D., 1999, ‘Quantum Theory of Probability and Decisions’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A 455: 3129–3137. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Dieks, D., and Vermaas, P. E. (eds.), 1998, The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Donald, M., 1998, ‘Discontinuity and Continuity of Definite Properties in the Modal Interpretation’, in Dieks and Vermaas (1998), pp. 213–222. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Dowker, F., and Kent, A., 1995, ‘Properties of Consistent Histories’, Physical Review Letters, 75: 3038–3041. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Dowker, F., and Kent, A., 1996, ‘On the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Statistical Physics, 82: 1575–1646. (Scholar)
- Epstein, S. T., 1953, ‘The Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Physical Review, 89: 319. (Scholar)
- Everett, H. III, 1957, ‘“Relative-State” Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 29: 454–462. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 315–323. (Scholar)
- van Fraassen, B., 1973, ‘Semantic Analysis of Quantum Logic’, in C. A. Hooker (ed.), Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 180–213. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Gell-Mann, M., and Hartle, J. B., 1990, ‘Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology’, in W. H. Zurek (ed.), Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 425-458. (Scholar)
- Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A., and Weber, T., 1986, ‘Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems’, Physical Review, D 34: 470–479. (Scholar)
- Giulini, D., Joos, E., Kiefer, C., Kupsch, J., Stamatescu, I.-O., and Zeh, H. D., 1996, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, Berlin: Springer; second revised edition, 2003. (Scholar)
- Greaves, H., 2007, ‘On the Everettian Epistemic Problem’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 120–152. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Greaves, H., and Myrvold, W., 2010, ‘Everett and Evidence’, in Saunders et al. (2010), pp. 264–304. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Griffiths, R. B., 1984, ‘Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Statistical Physics, 36: 219–272. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, Consistent Quantum Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Halliwell, J. J., 1995, ‘A Review of the Decoherent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 755: 726–740. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, ‘Somewhere in the Universe: Where is the Information Stored when Histories Decohere?’, Physical Review, D 60: 105031/1–17. (Scholar)
- Halliwell, J. J., and Thorwart, J., 2002, ‘Life in an Energy Eigenstate: Decoherent Histories Analysis of a Model Timeless Universe’, Physical Review, D 65: 104009/1–19. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Hartle, J. B., 1998, ‘Quantum Pasts and the Utility of History’, Physica Scripta, T 76: 67–77. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Healey, R., 1989, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Hemmo, M., 1996, Quantum Mechanics Without Collapse: Modal Interpretations, Histories and Many Worlds, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, Department of History and Philosophy of Science. (Scholar)
- Hemmo, M. and Shenker, O., 2001, ‘Can we Explain Thermodynamics by Quantum Decoherence?’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32 B: 555–568. (Scholar)
- Hermann, G., 1935, ‘Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik’, Abhandlungen der Fries'schen Schule, 6: 75–152. (Scholar)
- Holland, P. R., 1996, ‘Is Quantum Mechanics Universal?’, in J. T. Cushing, A. Fine and S. Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 99–110. (Scholar)
- Howard, D., 2004, ‘Who Invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A Study in Mythology’, Philosophy of Science, 71: 669–682. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Joos, E. and Zeh, H. D., 1985, ‘The Emergence of Classical Properties through Interaction with the Environment’, Zeitschrift für Physik, B 59: 223–243. (Scholar)
- Kay, B. S., 1998, ‘Decoherence of Macroscopic Closed Systems within Newtonian Quantum Gravity’, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 15: L89-L98. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Kochen, S., 1985, ‘A new Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, in P. Mittelstaedt and P. Lahti (eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1985, Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 151–169. (Scholar)
- Leggett, A. J., 1984, ‘Schrödinger's Cat and her Laboratory Cousins’, Contemporary Physics, 25: 583–594. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, ‘Testing the Limits of Quantum Mechanics: Motivation, State of Play, Prospects’, Journal of Physics, C 14: R415-R451. (Scholar)
- Lewis, P. J., 2010, ‘Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics’, Manuscrito, 33(1): 285–306. (Scholar)
- Mott, N. F., 1929, ‘The Wave Mechanics of α-ray Tracks’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A 126 (1930, No. 800 of 2 December 1929): 79–84. (Scholar)
- Nelson, E., 1966, ‘Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics’, Physical Review, 150: 1079–1085. (Scholar)
- Nelson, E., 1985, Quantum Fluctuations, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, ‘Afterword’, in W. G. Faris (ed.), Diffusion, Quantum Theory, and Radically Elementary Mathematics (Mathematical Notes 47), Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 227–230. (Scholar)
- von Neumann, J., 1932, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Berlin: Springer. Transl. by R. T. Beyer as Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955. (Scholar)
- Omnès, R., 1988, ‘Logical Reformulations of Quantum Mechanics: I. Foundations’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 53: 893–932; ‘II. Inferences and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment’, 933-955; ‘III. Classical Limit and Irreversibility’, 957–975. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, ‘Logical Reformulations of Quantum Mechanics: IV. Projectors in Semi-Classical Physics’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 57: 357–382. (Scholar)
- Pearle, P., 1997, ‘True Collapse and False Collapse’, in Da Hsuan Feng and Bei Lok Hu (eds.), Quantum Classical Correspondence: Proceedings of the 4th Drexel Symposium on Quantum Nonintegrability, Philadelphia, PA, USA, September 8–11, 1994, Cambridge, Mass.: International Press, pp. 51–68. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, ‘Combining Stochastic Dynamical State-Vector Reduction with Spontaneous Localization’, Physical Review, A 39: 2277–2289. (Scholar)
- Pearle, P., and Squires, E., 1994, ‘Bound-State Excitation, Nucleon Decay Experiments, and Models of Wave-Function Collapse’, Physical Review Letters, 73: 1–5. (Scholar)
- Ridderbos, K., 1999, ‘The Loss of Coherence in Quantum Cosmology’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 30 B: 41–60. (Scholar)
- Sanz, A. S., and Borondo, F., 2009, ‘Contextuality, Decoherence and Quantum Trajectories’, Chemical Physics Letters, 478: 301–306. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Saunders, S., 1993, ‘Decoherence, Relative States, and Evolutionary Adaptation’, Foundations of Physics, 23: 1553–1585. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, ‘The “Beables” of Relativistic Pilot-Wave Theory’, in J. Butterfield and C. Pagonis (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–89. (Scholar)
- Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., and Wallace, D. (eds.), 2010, Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Schlosshauer, M., 2007, Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition, Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
- Shimony, A., 1989, ‘Search for a Worldview which can Accommodate our Knowledge of Microphysics’, in J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. Reprinted in A. Shimony, Search for a Naturalistic Worldview, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 62–76. (Scholar)
- Spekkens, R. W., and Sipe, J. E., 2001, ‘A Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics based on a Principle of Entropy Minimization’, Foundations of Physics, 31: 1431–1464. (Scholar)
- Struyve, W., 2011, ‘Pilot-wave Approaches to Quantum Field Theory’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 306: 012047/1–10. (Scholar)
- Struyve, W., and Westman, H., 2007, ‘A Minimalist Pilot-wave Model for Quantum Electrodynamics’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A 463: 3115–3129. (Scholar)
- Tegmark, M., 1993, ‘Apparent Wave Function Collapse Caused by Scattering’, Foundations of Physics Letters, 6: 571–590. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Wallace, D., 2003a, ‘Everett and Structure’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34 B: 87–105. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2003b, ‘Everettian Rationality: Defending Deutsch's Approach to Probability in the Everett Interpretation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34 B: 415–439. [Preprint available online] [See also the longer, unpublished version titled ‘Quantum Probability and Decision Theory, Revisited’ referenced in the Other Internet Resources.] (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, ‘Quantum Probability from Subjective Likelihood: Improving on Deutsch's Proof of the Probability Rule’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 311–332. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, ‘Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics’, in D. Rickles (ed.), The Ashgate Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Physics, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 16–98. [Preliminary version available online as ‘The Quantum Measurement Problem: State of Play’, December 2007.] (Scholar)
- Wheeler, J. A., and Zurek, W. H. (eds.), 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Wightman, A. S., 1995, ‘Superselection Rules: Old and New’, Il Nuovo Cimento, 110 B: 751–769. (Scholar)
- Zeh, H. D., 1970, ‘On the Interpretation of Measurement in Quantum Theory’, Foundations of Physics, 1: 69–76. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 342–349. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, ‘Toward a Quantum Theory of Observation’, Foundations of Physics, 3: 109–116. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, ‘Basic Concepts and Their Interpretation’. Revised edition of Chapter 2 of Giulini et al. (1996). [Page numbers refer to the preprint available online, entitled ‘Decoherence: Basic Concepts and Their Interpretation’.] (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, ‘The Problem of Conscious Observation in Quantum Mechanical Description’, Foundations of Physics Letters, 13: 221–233. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time, Berlin: Springer, 4th edition. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, ‘There is no “First” Quantization’, Physics Letters, A 309: 329–334. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- Zurek, W. H., 1981, ‘Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into what Mixture does the Wave Packet Collapse?’, Physical Review, D 24: 1516–1525. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, ‘Environment-Induced Superselection Rules’, Physical Review, D 26: 1862–1880. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, ‘Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical’, Physics Today, 44 (October): 36–44. [Abstract and updated (2003) version available online, under the title ‘Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited’.] (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, ‘Negotiating the Tricky Border Between Quantum and Classical’, Physics Today, 46 (April): 84–90. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, ‘Decoherence, Einselection, and the Existential Interpretation (The Rough Guide)’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A 356: 1793–1820. [Preprint available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, ‘Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 75: 715–775. [Page numbers refer to the preprint available online.] (Scholar)
- Zurek, W. H., and Paz, J.-P., 1994, ‘Decoherence, Chaos, and the Second Law’, Physical Review Letters, 72: 2508–2511. (Scholar)
