Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics" by Guido Bacciagaluppi
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Adler, S. L., 2003, ‘Why Decoherence has not Solved the Measurement Problem: A Response to P. W. Anderson’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34 B: 135–142 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Albert, D., 1992, Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Albert, D., and Loewer, B., 1988, ‘Interpreting the Many Worlds Interpretation’, Synthese, 77: 195–213 [reprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Allori, V., 2001, Decoherence and the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics, Ph.D. Thesis, Università di Genova. (Scholar)
- Allori, V., and Zanghì, N., 2009, ‘On the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics’, Foundations of Physics, 39(1): 20–32 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Anglin, J. R., Paz, J. P., and Zurek, W. H., 1997, ‘Deconstructing Decoherence’, Physical Review, A 55: 4041–4053 [preprint available online.] (Scholar)
- Appleby, D. M., 1999, ‘Bohmian Trajectories Post-Decoherence’, Foundations of Physics, 29: 1885–1916 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Bacciagaluppi, G., 2000, ‘Delocalized Properties in the Modal Interpretation of a Continuous Model of Decoherence’, Foundations of Physics, 30: 1431–1444. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, ‘Remarks on Space-Time and Locality in Everett’s Interpretation’, in T. Placek and J. Butterfield (eds), Non-Locality and Modality (NATO Science Series, II. Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, Volume 64), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 105–122 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, ‘Probability, Arrow of Time and Decoherence’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 439–456 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014a, ‘Insolubility from No-Signalling’, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 53(10): 3465–3474 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014b, ‘A Critic Looks at QBism‘, in M. C. Galavotti, S. Hartmann, M. Weber, W. Gonzalez, D. Dieks and T. Uebel (eds), New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, Cham: Springer, pp. 403–416 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, ‘Unscrambling Subjective and Epistemic Probabilities’, in M. Hemmo and O. Shenker (eds.), Quantum, Probability, Logic – Itamar Pitowsky’s Work and Influence, Berlin: Springer, pp. 49–89 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Bacciagaluppi, G., and Valentini, A., 2009, Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Barbour, J., 1999, The End of Time (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson). (Scholar)
- Barrett, J. A., 2015, ‘Pure Wave Mechanics and the Very Idea of Empirical Adequacy’, Synthese, 192(10): 3071–3104 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Bassi, A. and Ghirardi, G., 2000, ‘A General Argument Against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle’, Physics Letters A, 275(5–6): 373–381 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Bassi, A. and Ulbricht, H., 2014, ‘Collapse Models: From Theoretical Foundations to Experimental Verifications’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 504(1), 012023 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Bell, J. S., 1987, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Bene, G., and Dieks, D., 2002, ‘A Perspectival Version of the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Origin of Macroscopic Behavior’, Foundations of Physics, 32: 645–672 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Ben-Menahem, Y., and Hemmo, M. (eds), 2012, Probability in Physics, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
- Berkovitz, J., 2012, ‘The World According to de Finetti: On de Finetti’s Theory of Probability and its Application to Quantum Mechanics‘, in Ben-Menahem and Hemmo (2012), pp. 249–280 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Berkovitz, J., and Hemmo, M., 2006, ‘Modal Interpretations and Relativity: A Reconsideration’, in W. Demopoulos and I. Pitowsky (eds.), Physical Theory and its Interpretation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Bub (Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 72), New York: Springer, pp. 1–28. (Scholar)
- Bhattacharya, T., Habib, S. and Jacobs, K., 2000, ‘Continuous Quantum Measurement and the Emergence of Classical Chaos’, Physical Review Letters 85(23): 4852–4855 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- de Broglie, L., 1928, ‘La nouvelle dynamique des quanta’, in [H. Lorentz (ed.)], Électrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique […] Solvay, Paris: Gauthiers-Villars. Translated as ‘The New Dynamics of Quanta’ in Bacciagaluppi and Valentini (2009), pp. 374–407. (Scholar)
- Bohm, D., 1952, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables: I and II’, Physical Review, 85: 166–179 and 180–193. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 369–396. (Scholar)
- Bohm, D., and Hiley, B., 1993, The Undivided Universe, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Brun, T., 2002, ‘A Simple Model of Quantum Trajectories’, American Journal of Physics 70(7): pp. 719–737 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Bub, J., 1997, Interpreting the Quantum World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2nd corrected edition, 1999). (Scholar)
- Cai, J., Guerreschi, G. G., and Briegel, H. J., 2010, ‘Quantum Control and Entanglement in a Chemical Compass’, Physical Review Letters, 104(22): 220502/1–4 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Derakhshani, M., 2017, Stochastic Mechanics Without ad hoc Quantization: Theory and Applications to Semiclassical Gravity, PhD Thesis, Universiteit Utrecht [available online]. (Scholar)
- Dieks, D., and Vermaas, P. E. (eds), 1998, The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Donald, M., 1998, ‘Discontinuity and Continuity of Definite Properties in the Modal Interpretation’, in Dieks and Vermaas (1998), pp. 213–222 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Dowker, F., and Kent, A., 1995, ‘Properties of Consistent Histories’, Physical Review Letters, 75: 3038–3041 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Dowker, F., and Kent, A., 1996, ‘On the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Statistical Physics, 82: 1575–1646 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Epstein, S. T., 1953, ‘The Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Physical Review, 89: 319. (Scholar)
- Everett, H. III, 1957, ‘“Relative-State” Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 29: 454–462. Reprinted in Everett (2012), pp. 173–196, and in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 315–323. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955–1980 with Commentary, ed. by J. A. Barrett and P. Byrne, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Felline, L., and Bacciagaluppi, G., 2013, ‘Locality and Mentality in Everett Interpretations: Albert and Loewer’s Many Minds’, Mind and Matter, 11(2): 223–241 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- van Fraassen, B., 1973, ‘Semantic Analysis of Quantum Logic’, in C. A. Hooker (ed.), Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 180–213. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, ‘Rovelli’s World’, Foundations of Physics, 40(4): 390–417 [reprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Fuchs, C. A., and Schack, R., 2012, ‘Bayesian Conditioning, the Reflection Principle, and Quantum Decoherence’, in Ben-Menahem and Hemmo (2012), pp. 233–247 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Gell-Mann, M., and Hartle, J. B., 1990, ‘Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology’, in W. H. Zurek (ed.), Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 425–458 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Ghirardi, G.C., Rimini, A., and Weber, T., 1986, ‘Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems’, Physical Review, D 34: 470–479 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Giulini, D., Kiefer, C. and Zeh, H.-D., 1995, ‘Symmetries, Superselection Rules, and Decoherence’, Physics Letters A, 199(5–6): 291–298 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Giulini, D., Joos, E., Kiefer, C., Kupsch, J., Stamatescu, I.-O., and Zeh, H.-D., 1996, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, Berlin: Springer (for the revised edition, see Joos et al. (2003)). (Scholar)
- Griffiths, R. B., 1984, ‘Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Statistical Physics, 36: 219–272. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, Consistent Quantum Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Halliwell, J. J., 1995, ‘A Review of the Decoherent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 755: 726–740 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, ‘Somewhere in the Universe: Where is the Information Stored when Histories Decohere?’, Physical Review, D 60: 105031/1–17 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, ‘ Macroscopic Superpositions, Decoherent Histories, and the Emergence of Hydrodynamical Behaviour’ in Saunders et al. (2010), pp. 99–118. (Scholar)
- Halliwell, J. J., and Thorwart, J., 2002, ‘Life in an Energy Eigenstate: Decoherent Histories Analysis of a Model Timeless Universe’, Physical Review, D 65: 104009/1–19 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Hameroff, S. R., and Penrose, R., 1996 ‘Conscious Events as Orchestrated Spacetime Selections’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1): 36–53. (Scholar)
- Hartle, J. B., 1998, ‘Quantum Pasts and the Utility of History’, Physica Scripta, T 76: 67–77 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, ‘The Physics of “Now”’, American Journal of Physics, 73(2): 101–109 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, ‘ Quasiclassical Realms’, in Saunders et al. (2010), pp. 73–98. (Scholar)
- Healey, R., 1989, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Hemmo, M., 1996, Quantum Mechanics Without Collapse: Modal Interpretations, Histories and Many Worlds, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge. (Scholar)
- Hemmo, M. and Shenker, O., 2001, ‘Can we Explain Thermodynamics by Quantum Decoherence?’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32 B: 555–568. doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(01)00029-6 (Scholar)
- Hermann, G., 1935, ‘Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik’, Abhandlungen der Fries’schen Schule, 6: 75–152. Translated as ‘Natural-Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics‘ in E. Crull and G. Bacciagaluppi (eds), Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer (2017), pp. 239–278. (Scholar)
- Holland, P. R., 1996, ‘Is Quantum Mechanics Universal?’, in J. T. Cushing, A. Fine and S. Goldstein (eds), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 99–110. (Scholar)
- Joos, E. and Zeh, H.-D., 1985, ‘The Emergence of Classical Properties through Interaction with the Environment’, Zeitschrift für Physik, B 59: 223–243 [reprint available online from the decoherence website]. (Scholar)
- Joos, E., Zeh, H.-D., Kiefer, C., Giulini, D., Kupsch, J., and Stamatescu, I.-O., 2003. Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
- Kay, B. S., 1998, ‘Decoherence of Macroscopic Closed Systems within Newtonian Quantum Gravity’, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 15: L89–L98 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Kent, A., 1998, ‘Quantum Histories’, Physica Scripta, T76: 78–84 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Kiefer, C., 1994, ‘The Semiclassical Approximation to Quantum Gravity’, in J. Ehlers and H. Friedrich (eds), Canonical Gravity: From Classical to Quantum, Berlin: Springer, pp. 170–212 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Kochen, S., 1985, ‘A New Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, in P. Mittelstaedt and P. Lahti (eds), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1985, Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 151–169. (Scholar)
- Leggett, A. J., 1984, ‘Schrödinger’s Cat and her Laboratory Cousins’, Contemporary Physics, 25: 583–594. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, ‘Testing the Limits of Quantum Mechanics: Motivation, State of Play, Prospects’, Journal of Physics, C 14: R415–R451. (Scholar)
- Maudlin, T., 1995, ‘Three Measurement Problems’, Topoi, 14(1): 7–15. (Scholar)
- Mott, N. F., 1929, ‘The Wave Mechanics of \(\alpha\)-ray Tracks’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A 126 (1930, No. 800 of 2 December 1929): 79–84. (Scholar)
- Nelson, E., 1966, ‘Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics’, Physical Review, 150: 1079–1085. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, Quantum Fluctuations, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, ‘Afterword’, in W. G. Faris (ed.), Diffusion, Quantum Theory, and Radically Elementary Mathematics (Mathematical Notes 47), Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 227–230. (Scholar)
- von Neumann, J., 1932, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Berlin: Springer. Translated by R. T. Beyer as Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton: Princeton University Press (1955). (Scholar)
- Omnès, R., 1988, ‘Logical Reformulations of Quantum Mechanics: I. Foundations’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 53: 893–932; ‘II. Inferences and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Experiment’, 933–955; ‘III. Classical Limit and Irreversibility’, 957–975. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, ‘Logical Reformulations of Quantum Mechanics: IV. Projectors in Semi-Classical Physics’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 57: 357–382. (Scholar)
- Osnaghi, S., Freitas, F., and Freire, O. Jr, 2009, ‘The Origin of the Everettian Heresy, ’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40(2): 97–123. (Scholar)
- Pearle, P., 1989, ‘Combining Stochastic Dynamical State-Vector Reduction with Spontaneous Localization’, Physical Review, A 39: 2277–2289 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––,1997, ‘True Collapse and False Collapse’, in Da Hsuan Feng and Bei Lok Hu (eds.), Quantum Classical Correspondence: Proceedings of the 4th Drexel Symposium on Quantum Nonintegrability, Philadelphia, PA, USA, September 8–11, 1994, Cambridge, Mass.: International Press, pp. 51–68 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Pearle, P., and Squires, E., 1994, ‘Bound-State Excitation, Nucleon Decay Experiments, and Models of Wave-Function Collapse’, Physical Review Letters, 73: 1–5 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Ridderbos, K., 1999, ‘The Loss of Coherence in Quantum Cosmology’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 30 B: 41–60. (Scholar)
- Romano, D., 2016, The Emergence of the Classical World from a Bohmian Universe, PhD Thesis, Université de Lausanne. (Scholar)
- Rosaler, J., 2015, ‘Is de Broglie–Bohm Theory Specially Equipped to Recover Classical Behavior?’, Philosophy of Science, 82(5): 1175–1187 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, ‘Interpretation Neutrality in the Classical Domain of Quantum Theory’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 53: 54–72 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Sanz, A. S., and Borondo, F., 2009, ‘Contextuality, Decoherence and Quantum Trajectories’, Chemical Physics Letters, 478: 301–306 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Saunders, S., 1993, ‘Decoherence, Relative States, and Evolutionary Adaptation’, Foundations of Physics, 23: 1553–1585. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, ‘The “Beables” of Relativistic Pilot-Wave Theory’, in J. Butterfield and C. Pagonis (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–89. (Scholar)
- Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., and Wallace, D. (eds), 2010, Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Schlosshauer, M., 2007, Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, ‘Classicality, the Ensemble Interpretation, and Decoherence: Resolving the Hyperion Dispute’, Foundations of Physics, 38(9): 796–803 [reprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Shimony, A., 1989, ‘Search for a Worldview which can Accommodate our Knowledge of Microphysics’, in J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. Reprinted in A. Shimony, Search for a Naturalistic Worldview, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1993), pp. 62–76. (Scholar)
- Spekkens, R. W., and Sipe, J. E., 2001, ‘A Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics based on a Principle of Entropy Minimization’, Foundations of Physics, 31: 1431–1464. (Scholar)
- Struyve, W., 2011, ‘Pilot-wave Approaches to Quantum Field Theory’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 306: 012047/1–10 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Struyve, W., and Westman, H., 2007, ‘A Minimalist Pilot-wave Model for Quantum Electrodynamics’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A 463: 3115–3129 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Tegmark, M., 1993, ‘Apparent Wave Function Collapse Caused by Scattering’, Foundations of Physics Letters, 6: 571–590 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Toroš, M., Donadi, S. and Bassi, A., 2016, ‘Bohmian Mechanics, Collapse Models and the Emergence of Classicality’, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 49(35): 355302 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Wallace, D., 2003, ‘Everett and Structure’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34 B: 87–105 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, ‘Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics’, in D. Rickles (ed.), The Ashgate Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Physics, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 16–98 [preliminary version available online as ‘The Quantum Measurement Problem: State of Play’, December 2007]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012a, The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012b, ‘Decoherence and its Role in the Modern Measurement Problem’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1975): 4576–4593 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Wallstrom, T. C., 1994, ‘Inequivalence between the Schrödinger Equation and the Madelung Hydrodynamic Equations’, Physical Review A, 49(3): 1613–1617 [reprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Wheeler, J. A., 1978, ‘The “past” and the “delayed-choice” double-slit experiment’, in A. R. Marlow (ed.), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, New York: Academic Press, pp. 9–48. (Scholar)
- Wheeler, J. A., and Zurek, W. H. (eds), 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Wightman, A. S., 1995, ‘Superselection Rules: Old and New’, Il Nuovo Cimento, 110 B: 751–769. (Scholar)
- Zeh, H.-D., 1970, ‘On the Interpretation of Measurement in Quantum Theory’, Foundations of Physics, 1: 69–76. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 342–349. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, ‘Toward a Quantum Theory of Observation’, Foundations of Physics, 3: 109–116 [corrected version available online, June 2003]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, ‘The Problem of Conscious Observation in Quantum Mechanical Description’, Foundations of Physics Letters, 13: 221–233 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time, Berlin: Springer, 4th edition. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003a, ‘Basic Concepts and Their Interpretation‘, in Joos et al. (2003), pp. 7–40 [page numbers refer to the preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003b, ‘There is no “First” Quantization’, Physics Letters, A 309: 329–334 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Zurek, W. H., 1981, ‘Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into what Mixture does the Wave Packet Collapse?’, Physical Review, D 24: 1516–1525. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, ‘Environment-Induced Superselection Rules’, Physical Review, D 26: 1862–1880. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, ‘Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical’, Physics Today, 44 (October): 36–44 [abstract and updated version available online as ‘Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical – Revisited’, June 2003]. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, ‘Negotiating the Tricky Border Between Quantum and Classical’, Physics Today, 46 (April): 84–90. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, ‘Decoherence, Einselection, and the Existential Interpretation (The Rough Guide)’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A 356: 1793–1820 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, ‘Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 75: 715–775 [page numbers refer to the preprint available online]. (Scholar)
- Zurek, W. H., and Paz, J.-P., 1994, ‘Decoherence, Chaos, and the Second Law’, Physical Review Letters, 72: 2508–2511 [preprint available online]. (Scholar)
