• Adler, S.L. and Bassi, A., 2009, ‘Is Quantum Theory Exact?’ Science, 325: 275–276. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Aguirre, A. and Tegmark, M., 2011, ‘Born in an Infinite Universe: A Cosmological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Physical Review D, 84: 105002. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Albert, D., 1992, Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Albert, D., 1996, ‘Elementary Quantum Metaphysics’, in J. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein (eds.), ‘Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 184: 277–284. (Scholar)
• Albert, D., 2010, ‘Probability in the Everett Picture’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 355–368. (Scholar)
• Albert, D., 2013, ‘Physics and Narrative’, in D. Struppa and J. Tollaksen (eds.), Quantum Theory: a Two-Time Success Story. Yakir Aharonov Festschrift, Milan: Springer, pp. 171–182. doi:10.1007/978-88-470-5217-8_11 (Scholar)
• Albert, D. and Loewer, B., 1988, ‘Interpreting the Many Worlds Interpretation’, Synthese, 77: 195–213. (Scholar)
• Allorri, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghi, N., 2011, ‘Many-Worlds and Schrödinger's First Quantum Theory’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62: 1–27. (Scholar)
• Allorri, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghi, N., 2014, ‘Predictions and Primitive Ontology in Quantum Foundations: A Study of Examples’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, doi:10.1093/bjps/axs048 (Scholar)
• Bacciagaluppi, G., 2002, ‘Remarks on Space-Time and Locality in Everett's Interpretation’, in Modality, Probability, and Bell's Theorems, (NATO Science Series). [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Baker, D.J., 2007, ‘Measurement Outcomes and Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B – Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 153–169. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Barnum, H., Caves, C.M., Finkelstein, J., Fuchs, C.A., and Schack, R., 2000, ‘Quantum Probability from Decision Theory’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 456: 1175–1182. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Barrett, J. A., 1999, The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds, Oxford: University Press. (Scholar)
• Barrett, J. A., 2011, ‘Everett's Pure Wave Mechanics and the Notion of Worlds’, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1: 277–302. (Scholar)
• Becker, L., 2004, ‘That Von Neumann did not Believe in a Physical Collapse’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55: 121–135. (Scholar)
• Belinfante, F. J., 1975, Measurements and Time Reversal in Objective Quantum Theory, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 50–51. (Scholar)
• Bell, J. S., 1964, ‘On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox’, Physics, 1: 195–200. (Scholar)
• Bell, J. S., 1987, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Bell, J. S., 1990, ‘Against Measurements’, in A. I. Miller (ed.), Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 17–32. (Scholar)
• Bevers, B.M., 2011, ‘ Everett's “Many-Worlds” Proposal’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B – Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42: 3–12. (Scholar)
• Bousso, R. and Susskind, L., 2012, ‘Multiverse Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Physical Review D, 85: 045007. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Bradley, D. J., 2011, ‘Confirmation in a Branching World: The Everett Interpretation and Sleeping Beauty’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62: 323–342. (Scholar)
• Brezger, B., Hackermüller, L., Uttenthaler, S., Petschinka, J., Arndt, M. and Zeilinger A., 2002, ‘Matter-Wave Interferometer for Large Molecules’, Physical Review Letters, 88: 100404. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Buniy, R.V., Hsu, S.D.H. and Zee, A., 2006, ‘Discreteness and the Origin of Probability in Quantum Mechanics’, Physics Letters B, 640: 219–223. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Byrne, P., 2010, The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett III: Multiple Universes, Mutual Assured Destruction, and the Meltdown of a Nuclear Family, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Chalmers, D. J., 1996, The Conscious Mind, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Collett, B., Pearle, P., Avignone, F., and Nussinov, S., 1995, ‘Constraint on Collapse Models by Limit on Spontaneous X-Ray Emission in Ge’, Foundation of Physics, 25: 1399–1412. (Scholar)
• Cuffaro, M. E., 2012, ‘Many Worlds, the Cluster-State Quantum Computer, and the Problem of the Preferred Basis’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43: 35–42. (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D., 1986, ‘Three experimental implications of the Everett interpretation’, in R. Penrose and C.J. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts of Space and Time, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, pp. 204–214. (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D., 1996, The Fabric of Reality, New York: The Penguin Press. (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D., 1999, ‘Quantum Theory of Probability and Decisions’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 455: 3129–3137. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D., 2002, ‘The Structure of the Multiverse’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 458: 2911–2923. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D., 2012, ‘Vindication of Quantum Locality’, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 468: 531–544. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D. and Hayden, P., 2000, ‘Information Flow in Entangled Quantum Systems’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 456: 1759–1774. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D. and Jozsa, R., 1992, ‘Rapid Solutions of Problems by Quantum Computation’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 439: 553–558. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Duwel, A., 2009, ‘The Many-Worlds Interpretation and Quantum Computation’, Philosophy of Science, 74: 1007–1018. (Scholar)
• De Witt, B. S. M., 1970, ‘Quantum mechanics and Reality’, Physics Today, 23(9): 30–35. (Scholar)
• Elitzur, A. and Vaidman, L., 1993, ‘Interaction-Free Quantum Measurements’, Foundation of Physics, 23: 987-997. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Everett, H., 1957, ‘Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’, Review of Modern Physics, 29: 454–462; see also ‘The Theory of the Universal Wave Function’, in B. De Witt and N. Graham (eds.), The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973. (Scholar)
• Gell-Mann, M. and Hartle, J. B., 1990, ‘Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology’, in W. H. Zurek (ed.), Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 425-459. (Scholar)
• Gleason, A. M., 1957, ‘Measures on the Closed Subspaces of Hilbert Space’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 6: 885–894. (Scholar)
• Graham, N., 1973, ‘The Measurement of Relative Frequency’, in De Witt and N. Graham (eds.) The Many-Words Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Greaves, H., 2004, ‘Understanding Deutsch's Probability in a Deterministic Universe’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35: 423–456. (Scholar)
• Greaves, H. and Myrvold, W., 2010, ‘Everett and Evidence’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.) , Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–205. (Scholar)
• Groisman, B., Hallakoun, N., and Vaidman, L., 2013 ‘The Measure of Existence of a Quantum World and the Sleeping Beauty Problem’, Analysis, 73: 695–706. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Hanson, R ., 2003, ‘When Worlds Collide: Quantum Probability from Observer Selection?’ Foundations of Physics, 33: 112–1150. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Hanson, R., 2006, ‘Drift-Diffusion in Mangled Worlds Quantum Mechanics’, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 462: 1619–1627. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Hartle, J. B., 1968 ‘Quantum Mechanics of Individual Systems’, American Journal of Physics, 36: 704–712. (Scholar)
• Hemmo, M. and Pitowsky, I., 2007, ‘Quantum Probability and Many Worlds’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 333–350. (Scholar)
• Hewitt-Horsman, C. and Vedral V., 2007, ‘Developing the Deutsch-Hayden Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, New Journal of Physics, 9: 135. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Joos, E., Zeh, H.D., Kiefer, C., Giulini, D., Kupsch, J., and Stamatescu, I.-O., 2003, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World, 2nd edn., Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
• Kent, A., 1990, ‘Against Many-Worlds Interpretation’, International Journal of Modern Physics A, 5: 1745–1762. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Kent, A., 2010, ‘One World Versus Many: The Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution, Probability, and Scientific Confirmation’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 307–354. (Scholar)
• Kragh, H., 2009, ‘Contemporary History of Cosmology and the Controversy over the Multiverse’, Annals of Science, 66: 529–551. (Scholar)
• Lewis, D., 1986, On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Lewis, P., 2000, ‘What is it like to be Schrödinger's cat?’ Analysis, 60: 22–29. (Scholar)
• Lewis, P., 2004, ‘Life in Configuration Space’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55: 713–729. (Scholar)
• Lewis, P., 2007, ‘Quantum Sleeping Beauty’, Analysis, 67: 59–65. (Scholar)
• Lewis, P., 2010, ‘Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics’, Manuscrito, 33: 285–306. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Lockwood, M., 1989, Mind, Brain & the Quantum, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Lockwood, M., Brown, H. R., Butterfield, J., Deutsch, D., Loewer, B., Papineau, D., Saunders, S., 1996, ‘Symposium: The ‘Many Minds’ Interpretation of Quantum Theory’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47: 159–248. (Scholar)
• Maudlin, T., 2010, ‘Can the World be Only Wavefunction?’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–143. (Scholar)
• Monton, B., 2006, ‘Quantum Mechanics and 3N-Dimensional Space’, Philosophy of Science, 73: 778–789. (Scholar)
• Ney, A., 2012, ‘The Status of our Ordinary Three Dimensions in a Quantum Universe’, Noûs, 46: 525–560. (Scholar)
• Page, D., 1999, ‘Can Quantum Cosmology Give Observational Consequences of Many-Worlds Quantum Theory?’ in C. P. Burgess and R. C. Myers (eds.) General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, Eighth Canadian Conference Montreal, Quebec, American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York, pp. 225–232. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Page, D., 2003, ‘Mindless Sensationalism: a Quantum Framework for Consciousness’, in Consciousness: New Philosophical Essays, Q. Smith and A. Jokic (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 468–506. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Papineau, D., 2010, ‘A Fair Deal for Everettians’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–205. (Scholar)
• Papineau, D. and Durà-Vilà, V., 2009, ‘A Thirder and an Everettian: A Reply to Lewis's 'Quantum Sleeping Beauty'’, Analysis, 69: 78–86. (Scholar)
• Price, H., 2010, ‘Decisions, Decisions, Decisions: Can Savage Salvage Everettian Probability?’ in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 369–390. (Scholar)
• Parfit, D., 1986, Reasons and Persons, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Pearle, P., 1986, ‘Models for Reduction’, in R. Penrose and C.J. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts of Space and Time, Oxford: Caledonia Press, pp. 204–214. (Scholar)
• Penrose, R., 1994, Shadows of the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Putnam, H., 2005, ‘A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Mechanics (Again)’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56: 615–634. (Scholar)
• Rubin, M. A., 2001, ‘Locality in the Everett Interpretation of Heisenberg-Picture Quantum Mechanics’, Foundations of Physics Letters, 14: 301–322. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Rubin, M. A., 2011, ‘Observers and Locality in Everett Quantum Field Theory’, Foundations of Physics, 41: 1236–1262. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Saunders, S. , 1993, ‘'Decoherence, Relative States, and Evolutionary Adaptation’, Foundations of Physics, 23: 1553–1585. (Scholar)
• Saunders, S., 1995, ‘Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Decoherence’, Synthese, 102: 235–266. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Saunders, S., 1998, ‘Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Probability’, Synthese, 114: 373–404. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Saunders, S., 2010, ‘Chance in the Everett Interpretation’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–205. (Scholar)
• Saunders, S. and Wallace, D., 2008a, ‘Branching and Uncertainty’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 293–305. (Scholar)
• Saunders, S. and Wallace, D., 2008b, ‘Reply’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 315–317. (Scholar)
• Schlosshauer, M., 2006, ‘Experimental Motivation and Empirical Consistency in Minimal No-Collapse Quantum Mechanics’, Annals of Physics, 321: 112–149. [Preprint ] (Scholar)
• Schlosshauer, M., 2007, Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition, Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
• Skyrms, B., 1976, ‘Possible Worlds, Physics and Metaphysics’, Philosophical Studies, 30: 323–332. (Scholar)
• Steane, A. M. , 2003, ‘A Quantum Computer Only Needs One Universe’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34: 469–478. (Scholar)
• Tappenden, P., 2000, ‘Identity and Probability in Everett's Multiverse’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51: 99–114. (Scholar)
• Tappenden, P., 2008, ‘Saunders and Wallace on Everett and Lewis’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 307–314. (Scholar)
• Tappenden, P., 2011, ‘Evidence and Uncertainty in Everett’s Multiverse’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62: 99–123. (Scholar)
• Timpson C. J., 2005, ‘Nonlocality and information flow: The approach of Deutsch and Hayden’, Foundations of Physics, 35: 313–343. [Preprint ] (Scholar)
• Tipler, F. J., 1986, ‘The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics in Quantum Cosmology’, in R. Penrose and C.J. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts of Space and Time, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1986, pp. 204–214. (Scholar)
• Tipler F. J., 2012, ‘Nonlocality as Evidence for a Multiverse Cosmology’, Modern Physics Letters A, 27: 1250019. [Preprint ] (Scholar)
• Vaidman, L., 1994, ‘On the paradoxical aspects of new quantum experiments’, Philosophy of Science Association 1994, pp. 211–217. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Vaidman, L., 1998, ‘On Schizophrenic Experiences of the Neutron or Why We should Believe in the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 12: 245–261. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Vaidman, L., 2001, ‘Probability and the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory’, in A. Khrennikov, (ed.) Quantum Theory: Reconsidereation of Foundations, Sweeden: Vaxjo University Press, pp. 407–422. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Vaidman, L., 2010, ‘Time Symmetry and the Many-Worlds Interpretation’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 582–596. [Preprint ] (Scholar)
• Vaidman, L., 2012, ‘Probability in the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, in Ben-Menahem, Y. and Hemmo, M. (Eds.), Probability in Physics, The Frontiers Collection XII Springer, pp. 299–311. [Preprint ] (Scholar)
• Vaidman, L., 2013, ‘Past of a Quantum Particle’, Physical Review A, 87: 052104. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Van Wesep, R., 2006, ‘Many Worlds and the Appearance of Probability in Quantum Mechanics’, Annals of Physics, 321: 2438–2452. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• von Neumann, J., 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Wallace, D., 2002, ‘Worlds in the Everett Interpretation’, Studies in History & Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33B: 637–661. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Wallace, D., 2003, ‘Everettian Rationality: Defending Deutsch's Approach to Probability in the Everett interpretation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34: 415–438. [Preprint ] (Scholar)
• Wallace, D., 2007, ‘Quantum Probability from Subjective Likelihood: Improving on Deutsch's Proof of the Probability Rule’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 311–332. [Preprint ] (Scholar)
• Wallace, D., 2010a, ‘ Decoherence and Ontology (Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love FAPP)’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–72. (Scholar)
• Wallace, D., 2010b, ‘How to Prove the Born Rule’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–263. (Scholar)
• Wallace, D., 2012, The Emergent Multiverse, Oxford: University Press. (Scholar)
• Wallace, D. and Timpson, C. J., 2007, ‘Non-locality and Gauge Freedom in Deutsch and Hayden's Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’, Foundations of Physics, 37: 951–955. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Wallace, D. and Timpson, C. J., 2010, ‘Quantum Mechanics on Spacetime I: Spacetime State Realism‏’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61: 697–727. (Scholar)
• Weissman, M. B., 1999, ‘Emergent Measure-Dependent Probabilities from Modified Quantum Dynamics without State-Vector Reduction’, Foundations of Physics Letters, 12: 407–426. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Wheeler, J., 1957, ‘Assessment of Everett's “Relative State” Formulation of Quantum Theory’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 29: 463–465. (Scholar)
• Wilson, A., 2013, ‘Objective Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64: 709–737. (Scholar)
• Wilson, A., 2014, ‘Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, doi:10.1093/bjps/axt018 (Scholar)
• Zeh, H. D., 1981, ‘The Problem of Conscious Observation in Quantum Mechanical Description’, Epistemological Letters, 63. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Zurek, W. H., 2003, ‘Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical’, Review of Modern Physics, 75: 715–775. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Zurek, W. H., 2005, ‘Probabilities from Entanglement, Born's rule p_k=|ψ_k|² from Envariance’, Physical Review A, 71: 052105. [Preprint] (Scholar)
• Zurek, W. H., 2009, ‘Quantum Darwinism’, Nature Physics, 5: 181–188. [Preprint] (Scholar)

Preprints

• Albrecht, A. and Phillips, D., 2012, ‘Origin of Probabilities and their Application to the Multiverse’ [Preprint]. (Scholar)
• Schwarz, W., 2010, ‘Belief Update Across Fission’ [Preprint]. (Scholar)
• Schwindt, D., 2012, ‘Nothing Happens in the Universe of the Everett Interpretation’ [Preprint]. (Scholar)
• Tappenden, P., 2010, ‘Varieties of Divergence: A Response to Saunders and Wallace’ [Preprint]. (Scholar)
• Vaidman, L., 1990, ‘On Schizophrenic Experiences of the Neutron or Why We should Believe in the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory’ [Preprint]. (Scholar)