• Adlam, E., 2014, ‘The Problem of Confirmation in the Everett Interpretation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 47: 21–32. (Scholar)
• Aguirre, A. and Tegmark, M., 2011, ‘Born in an Infinite Universe: A Cosmological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Physical Review D, 84: 105002. (Scholar)
• Albert, D. and Loewer, B., 1988, ‘Interpreting the Many Worlds Interpretation’, Synthese, 77: 195–213. (Scholar)
• Albert, D., 1992, Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, ‘Elementary Quantum Metaphysics’, in J. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein (eds.), ‘Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 184: 277–284. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, ‘Probability in the Everett Picture’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 355–368. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, ‘Physics and Narrative’, in D. Struppa and J. Tollaksen (eds.), Quantum Theory: a Two-Time Success Story. Yakir Aharonov Festschrift, Milan: Springer, pp. 171–182. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, After Physics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Albrecht, A. and Phillips, D., 2014, ‘Origin of Probabilities and their Application to the Multiverse’, Physical Review D, 90: 123514. (Scholar)
• Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghi, N., 2011, ‘Many-Worlds and Schrödinger’s First Quantum Theory’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62: 1–27. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, ‘Predictions and Primitive Ontology in Quantum Foundations: A Study of Examples’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, doi:10.1093/bjps/axs048 (Scholar)
• Araújo, M., 2019, ‘Probability in Two Deterministic Universes’, Foundations of Physics, 49(3): 202–231. (Scholar)
• Bacciagaluppi, G., 2002, ‘Remarks on Space-Time and Locality in Everett’s Interpretation’, in Modality, Probability, and Bell’s Theorems, (NATO Science Series). (Scholar)
• Baker, D. J., 2007, ‘Measurement Outcomes and Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B – Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 153–169. (Scholar)
• Barnum, H., Caves, C.M., Finkelstein, J., Fuchs, C.A., and Schack, R., 2000, ‘Quantum Probability from Decision Theory’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 456: 1175–1182. (Scholar)
• Barrett, J. A., 1999, The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, ‘Everett’s Pure Wave Mechanics and the Notion of Worlds’, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1: 277–302. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, ‘Typical Worlds’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 58: 31–40. (Scholar)
• Barrett, J. A. and Byrne, P., 2012, The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955–1980 with Commentary, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Barrett, J. A. and Huttegger, M., 2020, ‘Quantum Randomness and Underdetermination’, Philosophy of Science, 87: 391–408. (Scholar)
• Becker, L., 2004, ‘That Von Neumann did not Believe in a Physical Collapse’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55: 121–135. (Scholar)
• Bédard, C. A., 2021a, ‘The ABC of Deutsch-Hayden Descriptors’, Quantum Reports, 3(2): 272–285. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021b, ‘The Cost of Quantum Locality’, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 477: 20200602. (Scholar)
• Berenstain, N., 2020, ‘Privileged Perspective Realism in the Quantum Multiverse’, in D. Glick, G. Darby, and A. Marmodoro (eds.) The Foundation of Reality: Fundamentality, Space, and Time, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 102–122. (Scholar)
• Belinfante, F. J., 1975, Measurements and Time Reversal in Objective Quantum Theory, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 50–51. (Scholar)
• Bell, J. S., 1987, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, ‘Against ‘Measurement’’, Physics World, 3: 33–40. (Scholar)
• Bevers, B.M., 2011, ‘ Everett’s “Many-Worlds” Proposal’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B – Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42: 3–12. (Scholar)
• Boge, F. J., 2019, ‘The Best of Many Worlds, or, is Quantum Decoherence the Manifestation of a Disposition?’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B – Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 66: 135–144. (Scholar)
• Bousso, R. and Susskind, L., 2012, ‘Multiverse Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Physical Review D, 85: 045007. (Scholar)
• Bradley, D. J., 2011, ‘Confirmation in a Branching World: The Everett Interpretation and Sleeping Beauty’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62: 323–342. (Scholar)
• Brown, H. R. and Wallace, D., 2005, ‘Solving the Measurement Problem: de Broglie-Bohm Loses out to Everett’, Foundations of Physics, 35: 517–540. (Scholar)
• Brown, H. R. and Timpson, C. G., 2016, ‘Bell on Bell’s theorem: The Changing Face of Nonlocality’, in Quantum Nonlocality and Reality , Mary Bell and Shan Gao (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 91–123. Section 9. (Scholar)
• Brown, H. R. and Ben Porath, G., 2020, ‘Everettian Probabilities, The Deutsch-Wallace Theorem and the Principal Principle’, Hemmo M., Shenker O. (eds.) Quantum, Probability, Logic (Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science), Cham: Springer, pp. 165–198. (Scholar)
• Brown, H. R., 2020, ‘Everettian Quantum Mechanics’, Contemporary Physics, 60(4): 299–314. (Scholar)
• Buniy, R.V., Hsu, S.D.H. and Zee, A., 2006, ‘Discreteness and the Origin of Probability in Quantum Mechanics’, Physics Letters B, 640: 219–223. (Scholar)
• Byrne, P., 2010, The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett III: Multiple Universes, Mutual Assured Destruction, and the Meltdown of a Nuclear Family, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Cao, J., Cogdell, R.J., Coker, D.F., Duan, H.G., Hauer, J., Kleinekathöfer, U., Jansen, T.L., Mančal, T., Miller, R.D., Ogilvie, J.P. and Prokhorenko, V.I., 2020, ‘Quantum Biology Revisited’, Science Advances, 6(14): 4888. (Scholar)
• Carroll, S. M. and Singh, A., 2019, ‘Mad-dog Everettianism: Quantum Mechanics at its Most Minimal’, in Aguirre A., Foster B., Merali Z. (eds.) What is Fundamental? The Frontiers Collection, Cham:Springer, pp. 95–104. (Scholar)
• Chalmers, D. J., 1996, The Conscious Mind, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Chen, E. K., 2019, ‘Realism About the Wave Function’, Philosophy Compass, 14(7): 12611. (Scholar)
• Collett, B., Pearle, P., Avignone, F., and Nussinov, S., 1995, ‘Constraint on Collapse Models by Limit on Spontaneous X-Ray Emission in Ge’, Foundation of Physics, 25: 1399–1412. (Scholar)
• Cuffaro, M. E., 2012, ‘Many Worlds, the Cluster-State Quantum Computer, and the Problem of the Preferred Basis’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43: 35–42. (Scholar)
• Cunningham, A., 2014, ‘Branches in the Everett interpretation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46: 247–262. (Scholar)
• Dawid, R. and Thébault, K. P., 2014, ‘Against the Empirical Viability of the Deutsch Wallace Everett Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 47: 55–61 (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, ‘Many Worlds: Decoherent or Incoherent?’, Synthese, 192(5): 1559–1580. (Scholar)
• Dawid, R. and Friederich, S., 2020, ‘Epistemic Separability and Everettian Branches: A Critique of Sebens and Carroll’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D., 1986, ‘Three Experimental Implications of the Everett Interpretation’, in R. Penrose and C.J. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts of Space and Time, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, pp. 204–214. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, The Fabric of Reality, New York: The Penguin Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, ‘Quantum Theory of Probability and Decisions’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 455: 3129–3137. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, ‘The Structure of the Multiverse’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 458: 2911–2923. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘Vindication of Quantum Locality’, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 468: 531–544. (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D. and Hayden, P., 2000, ‘Information Flow in Entangled Quantum Systems’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 456: 1759–1774. (Scholar)
• Deutsch, D. and Jozsa, R., 1992, ‘Rapid Solutions of Problems by Quantum Computation’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 439: 553–558. (Scholar)
• De Witt, B. S. M., 1970, ‘Quantum Mechanics and Reality’, Physics Today, 23(9): 30–35. (Scholar)
• Diósi, L., 2015, ‘Testing Spontaneous Wave-Function Collapse Models on Classical Mechanical Oscillators’, Physical Review Letters, 114(5): 050403. (Scholar)
• Dizadji-Bahmani, F., 2015, ‘The Probability Problem in Everettian Quantum Mechanics Persists’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(2): 257–283. (Scholar)
• Drezet, A., 2020, ‘Making sense of Born’s rule \(p_\alpha=\lVert\Psi_\alpha\rVert^ 2\) with the many-worlds interpretation’, Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations, 8: 315–336. (Scholar)
• Duwel, A., 2009, ‘The Many-Worlds Interpretation and Quantum Computation’, Philosophy of Science, 74: 1007–1018. (Scholar)
• Elitzur, A. and Vaidman, L., 1993, ‘Interaction-Free Quantum Measurements’, Foundation of Physics, 23: 987–997. (Scholar)
• Everett, H., 1957, ‘Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’, Review of Modern Physics, 29: 454–462; see also ‘The Theory of the Universal Wave Function’, in B. De Witt and N. Graham (eds.), The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973. (Scholar)
• Fein, Y. Y., Geyer, P., Zwick, P., Kiałka, F., Pedalino, S., Mayor, M., Stefan Gerlich, S. and Arndt, M., 2019, ‘Quantum Superposition of Molecules Beyond 25 kDa’, Nature Physics, 15(12): 1242–1245. (Scholar)
• Frauchiger, D. and Renner, R., 2018, ‘Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of Itself’, Nature communications, 9(1): 1–10. (Scholar)
• Gao, S., 2017, The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Gell-Mann, M. and Hartle, J. B., 1990, ‘Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology’, in W. H. Zurek (ed.), Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 425–459. (Scholar)
• Gleason, A. M., 1957, ‘Measures on the Closed Subspaces of Hilbert Space’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 6: 885–894. (Scholar)
• Graham, N., 1973, ‘The Measurement of Relative Frequency’, in De Witt and N. Graham (eds.), The Many-Words Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Greaves, H., 2004, ‘Understanding Deutsch’s Probability in a Deterministic Universe’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35: 423–456. (Scholar)
• Greaves, H. and Myrvold, W., 2010, ‘Everett and Evidence’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–205. (Scholar)
• Groisman, B., Hallakoun, N., and Vaidman, L., 2013 ‘The Measure of Existence of a Quantum World and the Sleeping Beauty Problem’, Analysis, 73: 695–706. (Scholar)
• Hanson, R., 2003, ‘When Worlds Collide: Quantum Probability from Observer Selection?’ Foundations of Physics, 33: 112–1150. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, ‘Drift-Diffusion in Mangled Worlds Quantum Mechanics’, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 462: 1619–1627. (Scholar)
• Harding, J., 2020 ‘Everettian Quantum Mechanics and the Metaphysics of Modality’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, doi:10.1093/bjps/axy037 (Scholar)
• Hartle, J. B, 1968 ‘Quantum Mechanics of Individual Systems’, American Journal of Physics, 36: 704–712. (Scholar)
• Hemmo, M. and Pitowsky, I., 2007, ‘Quantum Probability and Many Worlds’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 333–350. (Scholar)
• Hemmo, M. and Shenker, O., 2020, ‘Why the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Needs More than Hilbert Space Structure’, in R. Peels, J. de Ridder and R. van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientific Challenges to Common Sense Philosophy, Routledge, pp. 61–70. (Scholar)
• Hewitt-Horsman, C. and Vedral V., 2007, ‘Developing the Deutsch-Hayden Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, New Journal of Physics, 9(5): 135. (Scholar)
• Jansson, L., 2016, ‘Everettian Quantum Mechanics and Physical Probability: Against the Principle of “State Supervenience”’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 53: 45–53. (Scholar)
• Joos, E., Zeh, H.D., Kiefer, C., Giulini, D., Kupsch, J., and Stamatescu, I.-O., 2003, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World, 2nd edition, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
• Kent, A., 1990, ‘Against Many-Worlds Interpretation’, International Journal of Modern Physics A, 5: 1745–1762. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, ‘One World Versus Many: The Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution, Probability, and Scientific Confirmation’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 307–354. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, ‘Does it Make Sense to Speak of Self-Locating Uncertainty in the Universal Wave Function? Remarks on Sebens and Carroll’, Foundations of Physics, 45: 211–217. (Scholar)
• Kragh, H., 2009, ‘Contemporary History of Cosmology and the Controversy over the Multiverse’, Annals of Science, 66: 529–551. (Scholar)
• Kuypers S. and Deutsch D., 2021, ‘Everettian Relative States in the Heisenberg Picture’, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 477(2246): 20200783. (Scholar)
• Lewis, D., 1986, On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Lewis, P., 2000, ‘What Is It Like to be Schrödinger’s Cat?’ Analysis, 60: 22–29. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, ‘Life in Configuration Space’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55: 713–729. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, ‘Quantum Sleeping Beauty’, Analysis, 67: 59–65. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, ‘Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics’, Manuscrito, 33: 285–306. (Scholar)
• Lockwood, M., 1989, Mind, Brain & the Quantum, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Lockwood, M., Brown, H. R., Butterfield, J., Deutsch, D., Loewer, B., Papineau, D., Saunders, S., 1996, ‘Symposium: The “Many Minds” Interpretation of Quantum Theory’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47: 159–248. (Scholar)
• O. Lombardi, S. Fortin, C. López, and F. Holik (eds.), 2019, Quantum Worlds: Perspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Mandolesi, A. L., 2018, ‘Analysis of Wallace’s Proof of the Born rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics: Formal Aspects’, Foundations of Physics, 48(7): 751–782. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, ‘Analysis of Wallace’s Proof of the Born rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics II: Concepts and Axioms’, Foundations of Physics, 49(1): 24–52. (Scholar)
• Marchildon, L., 2015, ‘Multiplicity in Everett’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 52: 274–284. (Scholar)
• Maudlin, T., 2010, ‘Can the World be Only Wavefunction?’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–143. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory, Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• McQueen, K. J., and Vaidman, L., 2019, ‘In Defence of the Self-Location Uncertainty Account of Probability in the Many-Worlds Interpretation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 66: 14–23. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, ‘How the Many Worlds Interpretation brings Common Sense to Paradoxical Quantum Experiments’, in R. Peels, J. de Ridder R. van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientific Challenges to Common Sense Philosophy, London: Routledge, pp. 61–70. (Scholar)
• Monton, B., 2006, ‘Quantum Mechanics and 3N-Dimensional Space’, Philosophy of Science, 73: 778–789. (Scholar)
• Myrvold, W. C., 2015, ‘What is a Wavefunction?’, Synthese, 192: 3247–3274. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, ‘Lessons of Bell’s Theorem: Nonlocality, yes; Action at a distance, not necessarily’, in Quantum Nonlocality and Reality: 50 Years of Bell’s Theorem, Mary Bell and Shan Gao (eds.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–260. (Scholar)
• Ney, A., 2021, The World in the Wave Function: a Metaphysics for Quantum Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Ney, A. and Albert, D., 2013, The Wave Function: Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Page, D., 1999, ‘Can Quantum Cosmology Give Observational Consequences of Many-Worlds Quantum Theory?’ in C. P. Burgess and R. C. Myers (eds.), General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, Eighth Canadian Conference Montreal, Quebec, Melville, New York: American Institute of Physics, pp. 225–232. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, ‘Mindless Sensationalism: a Quantum Framework for Consciousness’, in Consciousness: New Philosophical Essays, Q. Smith and A. Jokic (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 468–506. (Scholar)
• Papineau, D., 2010, ‘A Fair Deal for Everettians’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–205. (Scholar)
• Papineau, D. and Durà-Vilà, V., 2009, ‘A Thirder and an Everettian: A Reply to Lewis’s “Quantum Sleeping Beauty”’, Analysis, 69: 78–86. (Scholar)
• Price, H., 2010, ‘Decisions, Decisions, Decisions: Can Savage Salvage Everettian Probability?’ in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 369–390. (Scholar)
• Parfit, D., 1986, Reasons and Persons, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Pearle, P., 1986, ‘Models for Reduction’, in R. Penrose and C.J. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts of Space and Time, Oxford: Caledonia Press, pp. 204–214. (Scholar)
• Penrose, R., 1994, Shadows of the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Putnam, H., 2005, ‘A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Mechanics (Again)’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56: 615–634. (Scholar)
• Raymond-Robichaud, P., 2020, ‘A Local-Realistic Model for Quantum Theory’, Proc. R. Soc. A 477: 20200897. (Scholar)
• Read, J., 2019, ‘In Defence of Everettian Decision Theory’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 63: 136–140. (Scholar)
• Riedel, C. J., 2017, ‘Classical Branch Structure from Spatial Redundancy in a Many-Body Wave Function’, Physical Review Letters, 118(12): 120402. (Scholar)
• Riedel, C. J., Zurek, W. H. and Zwolak, M., 2016, ‘Objective Past of a Quantum Universe: Redundant Records of Consistent Histories’, Physical Review A, 93(3): 032126. (Scholar)
• Rubin, M. A., 2001, ‘Locality in the Everett Interpretation of Heisenberg-Picture Quantum Mechanics’, Foundations of Physics Letters, 14: 301–322. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, ‘Observers and Locality in Everett Quantum Field Theory’, Foundations of Physics, 41: 1236–1262. (Scholar)
• Saunders, S., 1993, ‘Decoherence, Relative States, and Evolutionary Adaptation’, Foundations of Physics, 23: 1553–1585. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, ‘Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Decoherence’, Synthese, 102: 235–266. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, ‘Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Probability’, Synthese, 114: 373–404. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, ‘Chance in the Everett Interpretation’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–205. [Saunders 2010/Updated 2016 Preprint] (Scholar)
• Saunders, S. and Wallace, D., 2008a, ‘Branching and Uncertainty’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 293–305. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008b, ‘Reply’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 315–317. (Scholar)
• Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A. and Wallace, D. (eds.), 2010, Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Schlosshauer, M., 2006, ‘Experimental Motivation and Empirical Consistency in Minimal No-Collapse Quantum Mechanics’, Annals of Physics, 321: 112–149. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition, Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, ‘Quantum Decoherence’, Physics Reports, 831: 1–57. (Scholar)
• Schwarz, W., 2015, ‘Belief Update Across Fission’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(3): 659–682. (Scholar)
• Sebens, C.T. and Carroll, S.M., 2018, ‘Self-locating Uncertainty and the Origin of Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(1): 25–74. (Scholar)
• Skyrms, B., 1976, ‘Possible Worlds, Physics and Metaphysics’, Philosophical Studies, 30: 323–332. (Scholar)
• Susskind, L., 2016, ‘Copenhagen vs Everett, Teleportation, and ER= EPR’, Fortschritte der Physik, 64(6–7): 551–564. (Scholar)
• Steane, A. M., 2003, ‘A Quantum Computer Only Needs One Universe’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34: 469–478. (Scholar)
• Stoica, O. C., 2019, ‘Representation of the Wave Function on the Three-Dimensional Space’, Physical Review A, 100: 042115. (Scholar)
• Tappenden, P., 2000, ‘Identity and Probability in Everett’s Multiverse’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51: 99–114. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, ‘Saunders and Wallace on Everett and Lewis’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 307–314. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, ‘Evidence and Uncertainty in Everett’s Multiverse’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62: 99–123. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, ‘Objective Probability and the Mind-Body Relation’s Multiverse’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B), 57: 8–16. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019a, ‘Everettian Theory as Pure Wave Mechanics Plus a No-Collapse Probability Postulate’, Synthese, 14: 1–28. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019b, ‘Everett’s Multiverse and the World as Wavefunction’, Quantum Reports, 1(1): 119–129. (Scholar)
• Tegmark, M., 2014, Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality, New York: Vintage. (Scholar)
• Timpson C. J., 2005, ‘Nonlocality and Information Flow: The Approach of Deutsch and Hayden’, Foundations of Physics, 35: 313–343. (Scholar)
• Tipler, F. J., 1986a, ‘The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics in Quantum Cosmology’, in R. Penrose and C.J. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts of Space and Time, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1986, pp. 204–214. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986b, ‘Interpreting the Wave Function of the Universe’, Physics Reports, 137: 231–275. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘Nonlocality as Evidence for a Multiverse Cosmology’, Modern Physics Letters A, 27: 1250019. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, ‘Quantum Nonlocality Does Not Exist’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences A, 111(31): 11281–11286. (Scholar)
• Vaidman, L., 1994, ‘On the Paradoxical Aspects of New Quantum Experiments’, Philosophy of Science Association 1994, pp. 211–217. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, ‘On Schizophrenic Experiences of the Neutron or Why We should Believe in the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 12: 245–261. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, ‘Probability and the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory’, in A. Khrennikov, (ed.), Quantum Theory: Reconsidereation of Foundations, Sweeden: Vaxjo University Press, pp. 407–422. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, ‘Time Symmetry and the Many-Worlds Interpretation’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 582–596. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘Probability in the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, in Ben-Menahem, Y. and Hemmo, M. (eds.), Probability in Physics, The Frontiers Collection XII Springer, pp. 299–311. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, ‘Past of a Quantum Particle’, Physical Review A, 87: 052104. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, ‘ Quantum Theory and Determinism’, Quantum Studies: Mathematical and Foundations, 1: 5–38. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016a, ‘All is \(\Psi\)’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 701: 1. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016b, ‘Bell Inequality and Many-Worlds Interpretation’, in Quantum Nonlocality and Reality: 50 Years of Bell’s Theorem, Mary Bell and Shan Gao (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–203. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, ‘Ontology of the Wave Function and the Many-Worlds Interpretation’, O. Lombardi, S. Fortin, C. López, & F. Holik (eds.), Quantum Worlds: Perspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 93–106. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, ‘Derivations of the Born rule’, Hemmo M., Shenker O. (eds.), Quantum, Probability, Logic, Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science. Cham: Springer, pp. 567–584. (Scholar)
• Van Wesep, R., 2006, ‘Many Worlds and the Appearance of Probability in Quantum Mechanics’, Annals of Physics, 321: 2438–2452. (Scholar)
• Vinante, A., Carlesso, M., Bassi, A., Chiasera, A., Varas, S., Falferi, P., Margesin, B. Mezzena, R. and Ulbricht, H., 2020, ‘Narrowing the Parameter Space of Collapse Models with Ultracold Layered Force Sensors’, Physical Review Letters, 125(10): 100404. (Scholar)
• von Neumann, J., 1932, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Berlin: Springer; R. T. Beyer (trans.) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955. (Scholar)
• Waegell, M., 2018, ‘An Ontology of Nature with Local Causality, Parallel Lives, and Many Relative Worlds’, Foundations of Physics, 48(12): 1698–1730. (Scholar)
• Waegell, M. and McQueen, K. J., 2020, ‘Reformulating Bell’s Theorem: The Search for a Truly Local Quantum Theory’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 70: 39–50. (Scholar)
• Wallace, D., 2002, ‘Worlds in the Everett Interpretation’, Studies in History & Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33B: 637–661. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, ‘Everettian Rationality: Defending Deutsch’s Approach to Probability in the Everett interpretation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 34: 415–438. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, ‘Quantum Probability from Subjective Likelihood: Improving on Deutsch’s Proof of the Probability Rule’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 38: 311–332. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010a, ‘ Decoherence and Ontology (Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love FAPP)’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–72. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010b, ‘How to Prove the Born Rule’, in S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–263. (Scholar)
• –––, The Emergent Multiverse, Oxford: University Press.
• Wallace, D. and Timpson, C. J., 2007, ‘Non-locality and Gauge Freedom in Deutsch and Hayden’s Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’, Foundations of Physics, 37: 951–955. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, ‘Quantum Mechanics on Spacetime I: Spacetime State Realism‏’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61: 697–727. (Scholar)
• Weissman, M. B., 1999, ‘Emergent Measure-Dependent Probabilities from Modified Quantum Dynamics without State-Vector Reduction’, Foundations of Physics Letters, 12: 407–426. (Scholar)
• Wheeler, J., 1957, ‘Assessment of Everett’s “Relative State” Formulation of Quantum Theory’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 29: 463–465. (Scholar)
• Wigner, E. P., 1961, ‘Remarks on the Mind-Body Question’, in I. J. Good, (ed.), The Scientist Speculates, Heinemann, pp. 284–302. (Scholar)
• Wilson, A., 2013, ‘Objective Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64: 709–737. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, ‘Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65: 573–598. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, ‘The Quantum Doomsday Argument’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 68: 597–615. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics as Modal Realism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Zeh, H. D., 1981, ‘The Problem of Conscious Observation in Quantum Mechanical Description’, Epistemological Letters, 63. (Scholar)
• Zurek, W. H., 2003, ‘Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical’, Review of Modern Physics, 75: 715–775. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, ‘Probabilities from Entanglement, Born’s rule \(p_k =|\psi_k |^2\) from Envariance’, Physical Review A, 71: 052105. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, ‘Quantum Theory of the Classical: Quantum Jumps, Born’s Rule and Objective Classical Reality via Quantum Darwinism’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376: 20180107. (Scholar)

Preprints

• Cuffaro, M. E., forthcoming, ‘The Philosophy of Quantum Computing’, in E. Miranda (ed.), Quantum Computing in the Arts and Humanities: An Introduction to Core Concepts, Theory and Applications, Dordrecht: Springer, [Cuffaro forthcoming preprint]. (Scholar)
• Parrochia, D., 2020, ‘Are there Really Many Worlds in the “Many-Worlds Interpretation” of Quantum Mechanics?”, [Parrochia 2020 preprint]. (Scholar)
• Saunders, S., forthcoming-a, ‘The Everett Interpretation: Structure’, The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics, E. Knox and A. Wilson (eds.), London: Routledge, [Saunders forthcoming-a preprint]. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming-b, ‘The Everett Interpretation: Probability’, The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics, E. Knox and A. Wilson (eds.), London: Routledge, [Saunders forthcoming-b reprint]. (Scholar)