Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Quantum-Bayesian and Pragmatist Views of Quantum Theory" by Richard Healey

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Bacciagaluppi, Guido, 2014, “A Critic Looks at QBism”, in M.C. Galavotti, S. Hartmann, M. Weber, W. Gonzalez, D. Dieks, and T. Uebel (eds.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, Switzerland: Springer International, pp. 403–415. (Scholar)
  • Bächtold, Manuel, 2008a, “Interpreting Quantum Mechanics According to a Pragmatist Approach”, Foundations of Physics, 38(9): 843–68. doi:10.1007/s10701">10.1007/s10701-008-9240-2">10.1007/s10701-008-9240-2 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008b, L’Interprétation de la Mécanique Quantique: une approche pragmatiste, Paris: Hermann.
  • Barrett, Jonathan, Cavalcanti, Eric. G., Lal, Raymond, and Maroney, Owen J.E., 2014, “No \(\psi\)-epistemic Model Can Fully Explain the Indistinguishability of Quantum States ”, Physical Review Letters 112, 250403. (Scholar)
  • Barzegar, Ali, 2020, “QBism Is Not So Simply Dismissed”, Foundations of Physics, 50(7): 693–707. doi:10.1007/s10701-020-00347-3 (Scholar)
  • Bell, John S., 2004, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bohr, Niels, 1958, The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr Volume II: Essays 1932–57 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press, 1987. (Scholar)
  • Brandom, Robert B., 2000, Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Brown, Harvey R., 2019, “The Reality of the Wavefunction: Old Arguments and New”, in Philosophers Look at Quantum Mechanics, Alberto Cordero (ed.), Cham: Springer Nature, pp. 63–86. (Scholar)
  • Brukner, Časlav, 2018, “A No-Go Theorem for Observer-Independent Facts”, Entropy, 20(350): 1–10. (Scholar)
  • Brukner, Časlav and Anton Zeilinger, 2003, “Information and Fundamental Elements of the Structure of Quantum Theory”, in Time, Quantum and Information, Lutz Castell and Otfried Ischebeck (eds.), Berlin: Springer, pp. 323–54. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10557-3_21 (Scholar)
  • Carnap, Rudolph, 1963, “Intellectual Biography”, in Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap, La Salle, IL.: Open Court, pp. 3–84. (Scholar)
  • Caves, Carlton M., Christopher A. Fuchs and Rüdiger Schack, 2002a, “Quantum Probabilities as Bayesian Probabilities”, Physical Review A, 65(022305): 1–6. doi:10.1103/physreva.65.022305 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002b, “Unknown Quantum States: the Quantum de Finetti Representation”, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 43(9): 4537–4559. doi:10.1063/1.1494475 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Subjective Probability and Quantum Certainty”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(2): 255–74. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.10.007 (Scholar)
  • DeBrota, John B., Fuchs, Christopher A. and Schack, Rüdiger, 2020, “Respecting One’s Fellow: QBism’s Analysis of Wigner’s Friend”, Foundations of Physics, 50: 1859–1874. doi.org/10.1007/s10701-020-00369-x (Scholar)
  • DeBrota, John B., Fuchs, Christopher A., Pienaar, Jacques L. and Stacey, Blake C., 2021, “Born’s Rule as a Quantum Extension of Bayesian Coherence”, Physical Review A, 104(022207): 1–12. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.022207 (Scholar)
  • Dirac, Paul A.M., 1930, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Einstein, Albert, 1949, “Remarks Concerning the Essays Brought Together in This Co-operative Volume”, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 665–688. (Scholar)
  • Einstein, Albert, Boris Podolsky, & Nathan Rosen, 1935 [EPR], “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?” Physical Review, 47(10): 777–80. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 (Scholar)
  • Friederich, Simon, 2011, “How to Spell Out the Epistemic Conception of Quantum States”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42(3): 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.01.002 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, Interpreting Quantum Theory: a Therapeutic Approach, London: Palgrave MacMillan. doi:10.1057/9781137447159 (Scholar)
  • Fuchs, Christopher A., 2011, Coming of Age With Quantum Information: Notes on a Paulian Idea, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017a, “On Participatory Realism”, in I. Durham and D. Rickles (eds.), Information and Interaction. The Frontiers Collection, Cham: Springer, pp. 113–134. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43760-6_7 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017b, “Notwithstanding Bohr, the Reasons for QBism”, Mind and Matter, 15(2): 245–300. (Scholar)
  • Fuchs, Christopher A., N. David Mermin, and Rüdiger Schack, 2014, “An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics”, American Journal of Physics, 82(8): 749–54. doi:10.1119/1.4874855 (Scholar)
  • Fuchs, Christopher A. & Rüdiger Schack, 2012, “Bayesian Conditioning, the Reflection Principle, and Quantum Decoherence” in Yemima Ben-Menahem and Meir Hemmo (eds.), Probability in Physics, Berlin: Springer, pp. 233–247. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21329-8_15 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Quantum-Bayesian Coherence”, Reviews of Modern Physics 85(4): 1693–1715. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.1693 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, “QBism and the Greeks: Why a Quantum State Does Not Represent An Element of Physical Reality”, Physica Scripta, 90(1): 015104. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/1/015104 [Fuchs and Schack 2015 available online] (Scholar)
  • Fuchs, Christopher A, & Stacey, Blake C., 2019, “QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero’s Handbook”, in Foundations of Quantum Theory, E.M. Rasel, W.P. Schleich, and S. Wölk (eds.), Amsterdam, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington D.C.: IOS Press, pp. 133–202. [Fuchs and Stacey 2019 available online] (Scholar)
  • Harrigan, Nicholas & Robert W. Spekkens, 2010, “Einstein, Incompleteness and the Epistemic View of Quantum States”, Foundations of Physics, 40(2):125–57. doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0 (Scholar)
  • Healey, Richard, 2012a, “Quantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(4): 729–771. doi:10.1093/bjps/axr054 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2012b, “Quantum Decoherence in a Pragmatist View: Dispelling Feynman’s Mystery”, Foundations of Physics, 42: 1534–1555, doi:10.1007/s10701–012–9681–5 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017a, “Quantum States as Objective Informational Bridges”, Foundations of Physics, 47(2): 161–173. doi:10.1007/s10701–015–9949–7 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017b, The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2020, “Pragmatist Quantum Realism”, in Scientific Realism and the Quantum, Steven French and Juha Saatsi (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123–46. (Scholar)
  • Jansson, Lina, 2020, “Can Pragmatism about Quantum Theory Handle Objectivity about Explanations?”, in Scientific Realism and the Quantum, Steven French and Juha Saatsi (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–67. (Scholar)
  • Landau, L.D. & E.M. Lifshitz, 1977, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edition, Oxford: Pergamon Press. (Scholar)
  • Lewis, David K., 1986, “A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Probability”, Philosophical Papers (Volume II), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–132. doi:10.1093/0195036468.003.0004 (Scholar)
  • Lewis, Peter J., 2020, “Quantum Mechanics and its (Dis)Contents”, in Scientific Realism and the Quantum, Steven French and Juha Saatsi (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 168–82. (Scholar)
  • Mermin, N. David, 2014, “QBism Puts the Scientist Back into Science”, Nature, 507(7493): 421–3. doi:10.1038/507421a (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, “Why QBism is Not the Copenhagen Interpretation and What John Bell Might Have Thought of It”, in Bertlmann and Zeilinger 2017: 83–93. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2019, “Making Better Sense of Quantum Mechanics”, Reports on Progress in Physics, 82(012002): 1–16. (Scholar)
  • Myrvold, Wayne, 2020a, “On the Status of Quantum State Realism”, in Scientific Realism and the Quantum, Steven French and Juha Saatsi (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 229–51. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2020b, “Subjectivists About Quantum Probabilities Should Be Realists About Quantum States”, in Quantum, Probability, Logic, Meir Hemmo and Orly Shenker (eds.), Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 449–65. (Scholar)
  • Peres, Asher, 1995, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. (Scholar)
  • Popper, Karl R., 1967, “Quantum Mechanics Without the Observer”, in Mario Bunge (ed.), Quantum Theory and Reality, New York: Springer, pp. 7–44. (Scholar)
  • Price, Huw, 2003, “Truth as Convenient Friction”, The Journal of Philosophy, 100(4): 167–190. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, Naturalism without Mirrors, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Pusey, Matthew A., Barrett, Jonathan., and Rudolph, Terry, 2012, “On the Reality of the Quantum State”, Nature Physics, 8: 475–78. (Scholar)
  • Renes, Joseph M., Robin Blume-Kohout, Andrew James Scott, & Carlton M. Caves, 2004, “Symmetric Informationally Complete Quantum Measurements”, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 45(6): 2171–80. doi:10.1063/1.1737053 (Scholar)
  • Stairs, Allen, 2011, “A Loose and Separate Certainty: Caves, Fuchs and Schack on Quantum Probability One”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42(3): 158–166. (Scholar)
  • Stapp, Henry Pierce, 1972, “The Copenhagen Interpretation”, American Journal of Physics, 40(8): 1098–1116. doi:10.1119/1.1986768 (Scholar)
  • Schrödinger, E., 1935, “Discussion of Probability Relations Between Separated Systems”, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31(4): 555–63. doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554 (Scholar)
  • Timpson, Christopher Gordon, 2008, “Quantum Bayesianism: A Study”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39(3): 579–609. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.03.006 (Scholar)
  • van Fraassen, C., 1984, “Belief and the Will”, Journal of Philosophy, 81(5): 235–56. doi:10.2307/2026388 (Scholar)
  • von Baeyer, Hans Christian, 2016, QBism: the Future of Quantum Physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • von Neumann, John, 1932, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Berlin: Julius Springer. First English edition Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955. (Scholar)
  • Wigner, Eugene, 1962, “Remarks on the Mind-Body Problem”, in I.J. Good (ed.), The Scientist Speculates: An Anthology of Partly-Baked Ideas, London: Heinemann, pp. 284–302. (Scholar)
  • Zeilinger, Anton, 2005, “The Message of the Quantum”, Nature, 438(7069): 743. doi:10.1038/438743a (Scholar)
  • Zwirn, Herve, 2016, “The Measurement Problem: Decoherence and Convivial Solipsism”, Foundations of Physics, 46(6): 635–667. doi:10.1007/s10701-016-9999-5 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2020, “Nonlocality versus Modified Realism”, Foundations of Physics, 50(1): 1–26. doi:10.1007/s10701-019-00314-7 (Scholar)
  • –––, forthcoming “Is QBism a Possible Solution to the Conceptual Problems of QuantumMechanics?” in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Quantum Interpretations, Olival Freire Jr, Guido Bacciagaluppi, Olivier Darrigol, Thiago Hartz, Christian Joas, Alexei Kojevnikov, and Osvaldo Pessoa Jr. (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Aug 1 01:40:49 2022