Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Historicist Theories of Scientific Rationality" by Thomas Nickles
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Andersen, Hanne, Peter Barker, & Xiang Chen, [ABC] 2006,
The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions, New York:
Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498404 (Scholar)
- Arabatzis, Theodore, forthcoming, “What’s in it for
the Historian of Science?” International Studies in the
Philosophy of Science. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, William & Robert C. Richardson, 1993, Discovering
Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific
Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Beiser, Frederick C., 2011, The German Historicist Tradition, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bloor, David, 1976, Knowledge and Social Imagery, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Brandom, Robert B., 2002, Tales of the Mighty Dead, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Campbell, Donald T., 1960, “Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes”, Psychological Review, 67(6): 380–400. doi:10.1037/h0040373 (Scholar)
- –––, 1974, “Evolutionary
Epistemology”, in Paul A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of
Karl Popper, La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 413–473. (Scholar)
- Carnap, Rudolf, 1950, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4: 20–40. Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity, second edition, enlarged, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956. (Scholar)
- Chang, Hasok, 2004, Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Cherniak, Christopher, 1986, Minimal Rationality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Collins, H.M. (ed.), 1981, Social Studies of Science,
11(1), special issue on Knowledge and Controversy. (Scholar)
- Crombie, Alistair C., 1994, Styles of Scientific Thinking in
the European Tradition, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
- Curtis, Ronald C., 1986, “Are Methodologies Theories of Scientific Rationality?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 37(1): 135–161. (Scholar)
- Darden, Lindley, 2006, Reasoning in Biological Discoveries: Essays on Mechanisms, Interfield Relations, and Anomaly Resolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498442 (Scholar)
- Daston, Lorraine J., 1988, Classical Probability in the
Enlightenment, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, “Historical
Epistemology”, in James Chandler, Arnold I. Davidson, &
Harry D. Harootunian (eds.), Questions of Evidence: Proof,
Practice, and Persuasion across the Disciplines, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 282–289. (Scholar)
- Daston, Lorraine J. & Peter Galison, 2007, Objectivity, New York: Zone Books. (Scholar)
- Daston, Lorraine J. & Elizabeth Lunbeck (eds.), 2011, Histories of Scientific Observation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Davidson, Arnold I., 2002, The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- De Langhe, Rogier, 2014a, “A Comparison of Two Models of Scientific Progress”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 46(June): 94–99. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.03.002 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014b, “A Unified Model of the Division of Cognitive Labor”, Philosophy of Science, 81(3): 444–459. doi:10.1086/676670 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014c, “To Specialize or to Innovate? An Internalist Account of Pluralistic Ignorance in Economics”, Synthese, 191(11): 2499–2511. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0436-z (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “Towards the Discovery of
Scientific Revolutions in Scientometric Data”,
Scientometrics, 110(1): 505–519.
doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2108-x (Scholar)
- Dennett, Daniel, 1995, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, New
York: Simon & Schuster. (Scholar)
- Dewey, John, 1929, The Quest for Certainty, New York: Minton, Balch. (Scholar)
- –––, 1939, Theory of Valuation, (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. II, no. 4), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted in the series The Collected Works of John Dewey 1882–1953: The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953: volume 13: 1938–1939, Essays, Experience and Education, Freedom and Culture, and Theory of Valuation, Carbondale, IL, Southern Illinois University Press. (Scholar)
- Domski, Mary & Michael Dickson (eds.), 2010, Discourse on
a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of
Science, Chicago: Open Court. (Scholar)
- Donovan, Arthur, Larry Laudan, & Rachel Laudan (eds.), 1988,
Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change,
Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Downes, Stephen M., 1993, “Socializing Naturalized Philosophy of Science”, Philosophy of Science, 60(3): 452–468. doi:10.1086/289746 (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “Agents and Norms in the New Economics of Science”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 31(2): 224–238. (Scholar)
- Dupré, John, 1993, The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Feest, Uljana & Thomas Sturm, 2011, “What (Good) Is Historical Epistemology? Editors’ Introduction”, Erkenntnis, 75(3): 285–302. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9345-4 (Scholar)
- Feigl, Herbert, 1970, “Beyond Peaceful Coexistence”,
in Roger H. Stuewer (ed.), Historical and Philosophical
Perspectives of Science (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of
Science, vol. 5), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.
3–11. (Scholar)
- Feyerabend, Paul K., 1962, “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism”, in Herbert Feigl & G. Maxwell (eds.), Scientific Explanations, Space, and Time (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 28–97. Reprinted in Feyerabend’s Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981: 44–96. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171526.005 (Scholar)
- –––, [1975] 1993, Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London: New Left Books. Third edition 1993, London: Verso. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, Farewell to Reason, London: Verso. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Realism and the Historicity of Knowledge”, Journal of Philosophy, 86(8): 393–406. Reprinted in Feyerabend’s Conquest of Abundance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999: 131–146. doi:10.2307/2026649 (Scholar)
- Fisch, Menachem, forthcoming, Creatively Undecided: Toward a History and Philosophy of Scientific Agency, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Friedman, Michael, 2001, Dynamics of Reason, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Synthetic History Reconsidered”, in Domski & Dickson 2010: 571–813. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Extending the Dynamics of Reason”, Erkenntnis, 75(3): 431–444. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9342-7 (Scholar)
- Fuller, Steve, 1988, Social Epistemology, Bloomington:
Indiana University Press. Second edition 2002. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents, Denver: Westview Press; 2nd edition, 1993, New York: Guilford Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, “Is History and Philosophy of Science Withering on the Vine?”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 21(2): 149–174. doi:10.1177/004839319102100201 (Scholar)
- Galison, Peter & David J. Stump (eds.), 1996, The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
- Giere, Ronald N., 1973, “History and Philosophy of Science: Intimate Relationship or Marriage of Convenience?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24(3): 282–97. doi:10.1093/bjps/24.3.282 (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive
Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Gigerenzer, Gerd, Peter M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group,
1999, Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart, Oxford: Oxford
University Press. (Scholar)
- Ginzburg, Carlo, 1998, “Style as Inclusion, Style as
Exclusion”, in Caroline A. Jones & Peter Galison (eds.),
Picturing Science, Producing Art, London: Routledge, pp.
27–54. (Scholar)
- Glymour, Clark N., 1980, Theory and Evidence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Goldman, Alvin I., 1999, Knowledge in a Social World,
Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/0198238207.001.0001 (Scholar)
- González, Wenceslao J. (ed.), 2013, Creativity,
Innovation, and Complexity in Science, La Coruña, Spain:
Netbiblio. (Scholar)
- Hacking, Ian, 1975, The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction, and Statistical Inference, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, Historical Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “‘Language, Truth and Reason’ 30 Years Later”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 43(4): 599–609. This issue is devoted to critical articles on Hacking’s styles of reasoning project. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.07.002 (Scholar)
- Hanson, Norwood Russell, 1962, “The Irrelevance of History of Science to Philosophy of Science”, Journal of Philosophy, 59(21): 574–586. doi:10.2307/2023279 (Scholar)
- Haraway, Donna Jeanne, 2004, The Haraway Reader, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Hesse, Mary, 1976, “Truth and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976, (vol. 2): 261–280. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, “The Hunt for Scientific Reason”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980, (vol. 2): 3–22. (Scholar)
- Howlett, Peter & Mary S. Morgan (eds.), 2011, How Well Do Facts Travel? the Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Howson, Colin & Peter Urbach, 1993, Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, 2nd edition, La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
- Hoyningen-Huene, Paul, [1989] 1993, Reconstructing Scientific
Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science
(Wissenschaftsphilosophie Thomas S. Kuhns), Alexander T.
Levine (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Hull, David L., 1988, Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Jammer, Max, 1957, Concepts of Force, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, & Amos Tversky, 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Kellert, Stephen H., Helen E. Longino, & C. Kenneth Waters
(eds.), 2006, Scientific Pluralism, (Minnesota Studies in the
Philosophy of Science 19), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota
Press. (Scholar)
- Kindi, Vasso & Theodore Arabatzis, (eds.), 2012,
Kuhn’s “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”
Revisited, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Kitcher, Philip, 1993, The Advancement of Science, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Knorr-Cetina, Karin, 1981, The Manufacture of Knowledge, Oxford: Pergamon Press. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, Thomas S., [1962] 1970a, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Second edition with added Postscript—1969) published in 1970. (Scholar)
- –––, 1970b, “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” In Lakatos & Musgrave 1970: 1–23. (Scholar)
- –––, 1971, “Notes on Lakatos”, in R.
Buck & R.S. Cohen (eds.), PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial
Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970: In Memory of
Rudolph Carnap, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 137–146. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, The Essential Tension,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, “The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science”, lecture reprinted in Kuhn 2000: 105–120. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, The Road Since Structure:
Philosophical Essays 1970–1993, Chicago: University of
Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kusch, Martin, 2010, “Hacking’s Historical Epistemology: A Critique of Styles of Reasoning”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41(2): 158–173. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.007 (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Reflexivity, Relativism, Microhistory: Three Desiderata for Historical Epistemologies”, Erkenntnis, 75(3): 483–494. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9336-5 (Scholar)
- Labinger, Jay A. & Harry Collins (eds.), 2001, The One Culture? A Conversation about Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Lakatos, Imre, 1970, “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in Lakatos & Musgrave 1970: 91–195. Reprinted in Lakatos 1978: 8–101. (Scholar)
- –––, 1971, “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions”, in R. Buck & R.S. Cohen (eds.), PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970, Dordrecht: Reidl. Reprinted in Lakatos 1978: 102–138. (Scholar)
- –––, 1976, Proofs and Refutations, (edited by John Worrall & Elie Zahar from previously published articles in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1978, The Methodology of Scientific
Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, John Worrall
& Gregory Currie (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. (Scholar)
- Lakatos, Imre & Alan Musgrave (eds.), 1970, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Lakatos, Imre & Elie Zahar, 1976, “Why did
Copernicus’s Programme Supersede Ptolemy’s?”, in
Lakatos 1978: 168–192. (Scholar)
- Latour, Bruno, 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar, 1979, Laboratory Life: The
Construction of Scientific Facts, Beverly Hills: Sage
Publications. (Scholar)
- Laudan, Larry, 1977, Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 48(1): 19–49. doi:10.1086/288975 (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Discussion: If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40(3): 369–375. doi:10.1093/bjps/40.3.369 (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “Normative Naturalism” (reply to the preceding articles by Doppelt, Leplin, & Rosenberg), Philosophy of Science, 57(1): 44–59. doi:10.1086/289530 (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence, Boulder, CO: Westview. (Scholar)
- Longino, Helen E., 1990, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- McGuire, J.E., 1992, “Scientific Change”, chapter 4 of Merrilee Salmon et al., Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 132–178. (Scholar)
- Merton, Robert King, 1973, The Sociology of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Mirowski, Philip, 1996, “The Economic Consequences of Philip Kitcher”, Social Epistemology, 10(2): 153–169. doi:10.1080/02691729608578812 (Scholar)
- Mitchell, Sandra D., 2003, Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Nersessian, Nancy J., 1995, “Opening the Black Box:
Cognitive Science and History of Science”, Osiris,
10(1): 194–2011. doi:10.1086/368749 (Scholar)
- Newell, Allen & Herbert A. Simon, 1972, Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
- Newton-Smith, W., 1981, The Rationality of Science, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Nickles, Thomas, 2009, “The Strange Story of Scientific
Method”, in Joke Meheus & Thomas Nickles (eds.), Models
of Discovery and Creativity (Origins: Studies in the Sources of
Scientific Creativity 3), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 167–207. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013a, “Tempo and Mode in Scientific
and Technological Innovation: Thomas Kuhn and Nonlinear
Dynamics”, in González 2013: 187–212. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013b, “Creativity, Nonlinearity, and
the Sustainability of Scientific Progress”, in González
2013: 143–172. (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming, “Strong Realism as
Scientism: Are We at the End of History?”, in Maarten Boudry
& Massimo Pigliucci (eds.), Science Unlimited? The Challenges
of Scientism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, in
press. (Scholar)
- Nowak, Leszek, 1980, The Structure of Idealization,
Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Okasha, Samir & Ken Binmore (eds.), 2012, Evolution and Rationality: Decisions, Co-Operation and Strategic Behaviour, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Pickering, Andrew, 1984, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Popper, Karl R., 1945, The Open Society and Its Enemies, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1957, The Poverty of Historicism, Boston: Beacon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1963, Conjectures and Refutations, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Radnitzky, Gerard & Gunnar Andersson (eds.), 1978,
Progress and Rationality in Science, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Reisch, George A., 1991, “Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism?”, Philosophy of Science, 58(2): 264–277. doi:10.1086/289615 (Scholar)
- Renn, Jürgen, 1995, “Historical Epistemology and
Interdisciplinarity”, in Kostas Gavroglu, John Stachel, &
Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and the Scientific
Community, 241–251, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “The Relativity Revolution from the Perspective of Historical Epistemology”, Isis, 95(4): 640–648. doi:10.1086/430654 (Scholar)
- Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg, 1997, Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, [2006] 2010a, An Epistemology of the
Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life, (Epistemologie
des Konkreten: Studien zur Geschichte der modernen Biologie),
Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, [2007] 2010b, On Historicizing
Epistemology: An Essay, (Historische Epistemologie zur
Einführung), David Fernbach (trans.), Stanford: Stanford
University Press. (Scholar)
- Richards, Robert J. & Lorraine Daston (eds.), 2016,
Kuhn’s, “Structure of Scientific Revolutions” at
Fifty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Rorty, Richard, 1979, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Rouse, Joseph, 2002, How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Rowbottom, Darrell P. & Otavio Bueno (eds.), 2011,
Synthese, 178(1): 1–169, special issue on stance and
rationality. (Scholar)
- Salmon, Wesley, 1990, “Rationality and Objectivity in
Science or, Tom Kuhn meets Tom Bayes”, in C. Wade
Savage (ed.), Scientific Theories, (Minnesota Studies in the
Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14), Minneapolis, MN: University of
Minnesota Press, pp. 175–204. (Scholar)
- Sankey, Howard, 1997, Rationality, Relativism and Incommensurability, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. (Scholar)
- Sarkar, Husain, 1983, A Theory of Method, Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Scheffler, Israel, 1967, Science and Subjectivity, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Scholar)
- Schickore, Jutta, 2011, “More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later”, Perspectives on Science, 19(4): 453–481. doi:10.1162/posc_a_00049 (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, About Method: Experimenters, Snake Venom, and the History of Writing Scientifically, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Sciortino, Luca, 2017, “On Ian Hacking’s Notion of
Style of Reasoning, Erkenntnis, 82(2): 243–264,
doi:10.1007/s10670-016-9815-9. (Scholar)
- Shapere, Dudley, 1984, Reason and the Search for Knowledge: Investigations in the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Shapin, Steven, 1982, “History of Science and Its Sociological Reconstructions”, History of Science, 20(3): 157–211. (Scholar)
- Shapin, Steven & Simon Schaffer, 1985, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Simon, Herbert Alexander, 1947, Administrative Behavior: A
Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative
Organization, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Soler, Léna, Emiliano Trizio, & Andrew Pickering
(eds.), 2015, Science as it Could Have Been: Discussing the
Contingency/Inevitability Problem, Pittsburgh, PA: University of
Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
- Solomon, Miriam, 2001, Social Empiricism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Stanford, P. Kyle, 2006, Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Sturm, Thomas & Uljana Feest (eds.), 2011, “What (Good) Is
Historical Epistemology?”, Erkenntnis, 75(3), special
issue. (Scholar)
- Suppe, Frederick, 1974, “The Search for Philosophic
Understanding of Scientific Theories”, in Frederick Suppe (ed.),
The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana, IL: University
of Illinois Press, pp. 1–232. (Scholar)
- Thagard, Paul, 2012, The Cognitive Science of Science:
Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press. (Scholar)
- Tiles, Mary & Jim E. Tiles, 1993, An Introduction to Historical Epistemology: The Authority of Knowledge, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Toulmin, Stephen Edelston, 1972, Human Understanding, vol. 1:
The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts, Oxford: Clarendon
Press. (Scholar)
- van Fraassen, Bas C., 2002, The Empirical Stance, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Wise, Norton, 2011, “Science as (Historical)
Narrative”, Erkenntnis, 75(3): 349–376. (Scholar)
- Worrall, John, 1988, “The Value of a Fixed Methodology”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39(2): 263–275. doi:10.1093/bjps/39.2.263 (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Fix It and Be Damned: A Reply to Laudan”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40(3): 376–388. doi:10.1093/bjps/40.3.376 (Scholar)
- Wray, K. Brad, 2011, Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social
Epistemology, New York: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/cbo9780511997990 (Scholar)
- Zammito, John H., 2004, A Nice Derangement of Epistemes, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)