Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Challenges to Metaphysical Realism" by Drew Khlentzos
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Armstrong, David, 1983, What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Azzouni, Jody, 1997, “Applied Mathematics, Existential Commitment and the Quine-Putnam Indispensability Thesis,” Philosophia Mathematica, 5: 193–209. (Scholar)
- Barrett, Thomas William, and Halvorson, Hans, 2017, “From Geometry to Conceptual Relativity,” Erkenntnis, 82(5): 1043–1063. (Scholar)
- Bays, Timothy, 2001, “On Hilary Putnam and his
Models,” Journal of Philosophy, 98: 331–50. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Two Arguments Against Realism,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 58(231): 193–213. (Scholar)
- Bennett, Karen, 2015, “‘Perfectly Understood, Unproblematic and Certain’: Lewis on Mereology,” in Barry Loewer and Jonathan Schaffer (eds.), A Companion to David Lewis, Oxford and New York: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Berger, A (ed.), 2011, Saul Kripke, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Berger, A. “Kripke on the Incoherency of Adopting a
Logic,” in Berger, A. (ed.) 177–210. (Scholar)
- Blackburn, S., 1986, “Morals and Modals,” in Fact, Science and Morality, G. Macdonald and C. Wright (eds.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. (eds.), 2000, Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Boghossian, Paul, 1989, “The Rule Following Considerations,” Mind, 93: 507–49. (Scholar)
- Bostrom, Nick, 2003, “Are you living in a Computer Simulation?” The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211): 243–255. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “The Simulation Argument: Reply to Weatherson” Philosophical Quarterly, 55(218): 90–97. (Scholar)
- Brandom, R. (ed.), 2000, Rorty and His Critics, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Brueckner, A., 1986, “Brains in a Vat,” Journal of Philosophy, 83(3): 148–167. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, “If I’m a Brain in a Vat
then I’m Not a Brain in a Vat,” Mind, 101:
123–28. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Conceptual Relativism,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79(4): 295–301. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Brains in a Vat” Journal of Philosophy, 83(3): 148–167. (Scholar)
- Burgess, John, 1984, “Dummett’s case for
intuitionism,” History and Philosophy of Logic, 5(2):
177–194. (Scholar)
- Button, T., 2013, The Limits of Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, “Brains in vats and model theory” in S. Goldberg (ed.) 2015, pp. 131–154. (Scholar)
- Carnap, R., 1950, “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4: 20–40. (Scholar)
- Carnap, R., 1963, “Replies and Systematic Expositions”in Schilpp, P. (ed.) 859–1013. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, Nancy, 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Chakravartty, Anjan, 2007, A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unknowable, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Chalmers, David, 2009, “Ontological Anti-Realism” in D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (eds.) 2009, 77–129. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, The Character of Consciousness, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R. (eds.), 2009, Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Chomsky, Noam, 1986, Knowledge of Language, Westport, CT: Prager. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, Language and Mind, 3rd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cogburn, Jon, 2005, “The Logic of Logical Revision:
formalizing Dummett’s argument,” Australasian Journal
of Philosophy, 83(1): 15–32. (Scholar)
- Cozzo, Cesare, 1994, “Are Dummett’s Requirements on a
Theory of Meaning Sufficient for Rejecting Classical Logic?”
Erkenntnis, 40(2): 243–263. (Scholar)
- Crain, Stephen, 2012, The Emergence of Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Crain, Stephen and Khlentzos, Drew, 2010, “The Logic Instinct,” Mind and Language, 25(1): 30–65. (Scholar)
- David, Marian, 1991, “Neither Mentioning ‘Brains in a
Vat’ nor Mentioning Brains in a Vat Will Prove That We Are Not
Brains in a Vat,” Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research, 51(4): 891–896. (Scholar)
- Davidson, Donald, 1973, “On The Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47: 5–20. (Scholar)
- –––, 1979, “The Inscrutability of Reference,” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 10(2): 7–19. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, “The Folly of Trying to Define Truth,” Journal of Philosophy, 93(6): 263–79. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Truth Rehabilitated,” in Brandom (ed.) 2000, 65–73. (Scholar)
- Devitt, Michael, 1983, “Realism and the Renegade Putnam: A Critical Study of Meaning and the Moral Sciences,” Noûs, 17(2): 291–301. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, Realism and Truth, Second Edition, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Dolev, Yuval, 2007, Time and Realism: Philosophical and
Anti-Philosophical Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Dorr, Cian, 2011, “Physical Geometry and Fundamental Metaphysics,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 111(1): 135–179. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Quantifier Variance and the Collapse Theorems,” The Monist, 97: 503–570. (Scholar)
- Douven, Igor, 1999, “Putnam’s Model-Theoretic Argument
Reconstructed,” Journal of Philosophy, 96(9):
479–490. (Scholar)
- Dummett, Michael, 1978, Truth and Other Enigmas, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, “Objections to Chomsky,”
London Review of Books, 3(16), September 3, 1981
[available online]. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, The Seas of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Is Time a Continuum of Instants?,” Philosophy, 75: 497–515. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Of What Kind of Thing is Truth a Property?” in Blackburn and Simmons 2000, 264–281. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Victor’s Error,”
Analysis, 62(2): 1–2. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Truth and the Past, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, Thought and Reality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Ebbs, Gary, 1992, “Skepticism, Objectivity and Brains in Vats,” Philosophical Topics, 20(1): 1–33. (Scholar)
- Edgington, Dorothy, 1981, “Meaning, Bivalence and Realism,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1980–1981, Vol. 81: 153–173. (Scholar)
- Einstein, A., Podolsky, B, and Rosen, N., 1935, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” Physical Review, 47(10): 777–780. (Scholar)
- Eklund, Matti, 2006, “Meta-Ontology” Philosophy Compass, 3: 317–334. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “The Picture of Reality as an Amorphous Lump” in Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne and Dean Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, Oxford: Blackwell, 382–396. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Carnap and Ontological Pluralism” in D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (eds.) 2009, pp. 130–156. (Scholar)
- Field, Hartry, 1978, “Mental Representation,” Erkenntnis, 13: 9–61. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Some Thoughts on Radical Indeterminacy,” The Monist, 81(2): 253–273. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, Truth and The Absence of Fact, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Fodor, Jerry, 1975, The Language of Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983, The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, The Language of Thought
Revisited, Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University
Press. (Scholar)
- Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest, 2002, The Compositionality Papers, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Forbes, Graeme, 1995, “Realism and Skepticism: Brains in a Vat Revisited”Journal of Philosophy, 92(4), 205 – 222. (Scholar)
- Gaiffman, Haim, 1996, “Is the ‘Bottom-Up’
Approach from the Theory of Meaning to Metaphysics Possible?”
Journal of Philosophy, 93(8): 373–407. (Scholar)
- George, Alexander, 1993, “How Not to Refute Realism,” Journal of Philosophy, 90(2): 53–72. (Scholar)
- Gödel, Kurt, 1949, “A Remark About the Relationship between Relativity Theory and Idealistic Philosophy,” in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (The Library of Living Philosophers: Volume 7), P.A. Schilpp (ed.), Evanston, IL: Open Court, 558. (Scholar)
- Goldberg, S. (ed.), 2015, The Brain in a Vat, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Hale, B. and Wright, C., 1997, “Putnam’s
Model-Theoretic Argument against Metaphysical Realism,” in A
Companion to the Philosophy of Language, B. Hale and C. Wright
(eds.) Oxford: Blackwell, 427–457. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “The Metaontology of Abstraction,” in D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (eds.) 2009, pp. 178–212. (Scholar)
- Hand, Michael, 2003, “Knowability and Truth,”
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81(2):
216–228. (Scholar)
- Hauser, Kai, 2001, “Objectivity over Objects: A Case Study in Theory Formation” Synthese, 128: 245–285. (Scholar)
- Hawthorne, John, 2006, “Plenitude, Convention and Ontology,” in J. Hawthorne, Metaphysical Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–69. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Superficialism in Ontology,” in D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (eds.) 2009, pp. 213–230. (Scholar)
- Hazen, Allen, 2012, “Intuitionism,” in The
Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language (Chapter 5.8),
Gillian Russell and Delia Graff Farra (eds.), New York: Routledge,
667–677. (Scholar)
- Hellman, Geoffrey, 1989, “Never Say ‘Never!’ On
the Communication Problem between Intuitionism and Classicism,”
Philosophical Topics, 17(2): 47–67. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, “The Boxer and His Fists: The
Constructivist in the Arena of Quantum Physics,” Proceedings
of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 66:
61–77. (Scholar)
- Huemer, Michael, 2016, “Serious Theories and Skeptical Theories: Why You Are Probably Not a Brain in a Vat,” Philosophical Studies, 173(4): 1031–1052. (Scholar)
- Hirsch, Eli, 1993, Dividing Reality, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Quantifier Variance and Realism,” Philosophical Issues, 12: 51–73. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “Physical Object Ontology, Verbal Disputes and Common Sense,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(1): 67–97. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Ontology and Alternative Languages” in D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (eds.) 2009, pp. 231–259. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, Quantifier Variance and Realism: Essays in Meta-Ontology, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Horgan, T. and Timmons, M., 2002, “Conceptual Relativity and Metaphysical Realism,” Noûs, 36(1): 74–96. (Scholar)
- Horwich, Paul, 1990, Truth, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Jackson, Alexander, 2015, “How You Know You Are Not a Brain in a Vat,” Philosophical Studies, 172(10): 2799–2822. (Scholar)
- Jackson, Frank, 2000, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Jenkins, C.S., 2010, “What Is Ontological Realism?,” Philosophy Compass, 5/10:880–890. (Scholar)
- Khlentzos, Drew, 2004, Naturalistic Realism and the Antirealist Challenge, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “Naturalism and the Question of Realism” in K. J. Clark (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 150–67. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, “Conceptual Schemes,” in
The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism (Chapter
48), M. Kusch (ed.), London, New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis
Group, pp. 457–467. (Scholar)
- Lewis, David, 1983, “New Work for a Theory of Universals,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61: 343–77. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, “Putnam’s Paradox,”
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62: 221–36. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, Parts of Classes, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, “Reduction of Mind” in S. Guttenplan, Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 412–31. (Scholar)
- Linnebo, O., 2018, “Dummett on Indefinite
Extensibility,” Philosophical Issues, 28(1):
196–220. (Scholar)
- Lynch, Michael (ed.), 2001, The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Lynch, Michael, 1998, Truth in Context: An Essay on Pluralism and Objectivity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Lowe, E. J. and Ramichandran, A. (eds.), 2009, Truth and
Truthmaking, Stockfield: Acumen. (Scholar)
- Michael, Michaelis, 1999, “Dummett’s Argument against
Classical Logic,” Philosophia, 27(3–4):
359–382. (Scholar)
- Maudlin, Tim, 2007, The Metaphysics within Physics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “What Bell did,”
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47:
1–24. (Scholar)
- McDowell, John, 1976, “Truth-conditions, Bivalance and Verificationism,” in G. Evans & J. McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 42–66. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- McGee, Vann, 2015, “Inscrutability and its Discontents,” Noûs, 39(3): 397–425. (Scholar)
- McGinn, Colin, 1976, “Truth and Use,” in M. Platts
(ed.), Reference, Truth and Reality, London: Routledge &
Kegan Paul, 19–40. (Scholar)
- –––, 1979, “An Apriori Argument for Realism,” Journal of Philosophy, 76: 113–33. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, “Realist Semantics and Content Ascription,” Synthese, 52: 113–34. (Scholar)
- Millikan, Ruth, 1986, “Metaphysical Anti-Realism?” Mind, XCV: 417–431. (Scholar)
- Moretti, Luca, 2014, “Global Scepticism, Underdetermination and Metaphysical Possibility” Erkenntnis, 79(2): 381–403. (Scholar)
- Nagel, Thomas, 1986, The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, The Last Word, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Pagin, Peter, 1998, “Bivalence: meaning theory vs metaphysics” Theoria, 64(2–3): 157–186. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Compositionality, Understanding and Proofs,” Mind, 118(471): 713–737. (Scholar)
- Papineau, David (ed.), 1996, The Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Pinker, Steven, 1994, The Language Instinct, New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics. (Scholar)
- Prawitz, Dag, 1977, “Meaning and Proofs: On the Conflict between Classical and Intuitionistic Logic,” Theoria, 48: 2–40. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Dummett on a theory of meaning
and its impact on logic,” in B. Taylor (ed.), Michael
Dummett: Contributions to Philosophy, Dordrecht: Martinus
Nijhoff. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, “Meaning theory and anti-realism,” in B. McGuinness and G. Olivieri (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Price, Huw, 2009, “Metaphysics after Carnap: the ghost who walks?” in D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (eds.) 2009, pp. 320–346. (Scholar)
- Pryor, James, 2007, “What’s Wrong with McKinsey-style
Reasoning?” in S. Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and
Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, pp. 177–200. (Scholar)
- Putnam, Hilary, 1981, Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, Realism and Reason, volume 3 of Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Truth and Convention: On
Davidson’s Refutation of Conceptual Relativism,”
Dialectica, 41: 69–77. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, Realism with a Human Face, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, Renewing Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994a, “The Dewey Lectures,”
Journal of Philosophy, 91: 445–517. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994b, Words and Life, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000a, The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body and World, New York City: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000b, “Richard Rorty on Reality and Justification,” in Brandom (ed.) 2000, 81–87. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Ethics Without Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012a, “Corresponding with
Reality,” in M. Caro and D. Macarthur (eds.), Philosophy in
an Age of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
72–90. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012b, “How to be a Sophisticated
‘Naïve Realist,” in M. Caro and D. Macarthur (eds.),
Philosophy in an Age of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 624– 39. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, “Naturalism, Realism, and Normativity,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association, Volume 1(2): 312–328. (Scholar)
- Quine, W.V.O, 1992, Pursuit of Truth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1969, “Ontological Relativity,” in W. Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90. (Scholar)
- –––, 1964, Word and Object, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Read, Stephen, 2000, “Harmony and Autonomy in Classical Logic,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 29(2): 123–154. (Scholar)
- Resnick, Michael, 1987, “You Can’t Trust an Ideal
Theory to Tell the Truth,” Philosophical Studies, 52:
151–160. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “Immanent Truth,” Mind, 99(395): 405–424. (Scholar)
- Sandqvist, Tor, 2009, “Classical Logic without Bivalence,” Analysis, 69(2): 211–218. (Scholar)
- Schilpp, Paul (ed.), 1963, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle: Open Court. (Scholar)
- Shapiro, Stewart, 1998, “Proof and Truth: Through Thick and Thin,” Journal of Philosophy, 95(10): 493–521. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “Why Anti-Realists and Classical Mathematicians Cannot Get Along,” Topoi, 20 (1): 53–63. (Scholar)
- Shapiro, Stewart and Taschek, William, 1996, “Intuitionism, Pluralism and Cognitive Command,” Journal of Philosophy, 93(2): 74–88. (Scholar)
- Shieh, Sanford, 1998, “On The Conceptual Foundations of Anti-Realism,” Synthese, 115(1): 33–70. (Scholar)
- Sider, Theodore, 2011, Writing the Book of the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Ontological Realism” in D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (eds.) 2009, pp. 384–423 (Scholar)
- Shoemaker, Sydney, 2011, “Kripke and Cartesianism,”in
A. Berger (ed.) 2011, pp. 327–342. (Scholar)
- Soames, Scott, 2014, “The Place of Quine in Analytic Philosophy,” in A Companion to W.V.O. Quine (Chapter 21), Gilbert Harman and Ernest Lepore (eds.), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 432–464. (Scholar)
- Sosa, Ernest, 2003, “Ontological and Conceptual Relativity and the Self,” in Michael J. Loux and Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Spelke, E. S., 2003, “What Makes Us Smart? Core Knowledge and Natural Language,” in E. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 277–311. (Scholar)
- Spelke, E. S. and Kinzler, K. D., 2007, “Core Knowledge,” Developmental Science, 10: 89–96. (Scholar)
- Stirton, William, 1998, “Anti-Realism, Truth Conditions and Verificationism,” Mind, 106(424): 697–716. (Scholar)
- Taylor, Barry, 2006, Models, Truth and Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Tennant, Neil, 1987, Anti-Realism and Logic, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, The Taming of the True, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Victor Vanquished,” Analysis, 62(2): 135–142. (Scholar)
- Thomasson, A., 2015, Ontology made easy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Tymoczko, T., 1989, “In Defence of Putnam’s
Brains,” Philosophical Studies, 57(3):
281–297. (Scholar)
- van Cleve, J., 1992, “Semantic Supervenience and Referential Indeterminacy,” Journal of Philosophy, 89: 341–361. (Scholar)
- Van Fraassen, B. C., 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, Laws and Symmetry, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “Putnam’s Paradox:
Metaphysical Realism Revamped and Evaded,” in J. Tomberlin
(ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 11: 17–42. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, The Empirical Stance, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- van Inwagen, Peter, 2002, “‘Carnap’ and
‘the Polish Logician’,” Acta Analytica,
17(28): 7–17. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Modes of Being and Quantification,” Disputatio, 6(38): 1–24. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, “The neo-Carnapians,” Synthese, 197(1): 7–32. (Scholar)
- Wagner, Steven, 1993, “Why Realism Can’t Be
Naturalized,” in S. Wagner and R. Warner (eds.), Naturalism:
A Critical Appraisal, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press,
211–253. (Scholar)
- Walker, Ralph, 1995, “Verificationism, Anti-Realism and Idealism,” European Journal of Philosophy, 3(3): 257–272. (Scholar)
- Warren, J., 2015, “Quantifier Variance and the Collapse Argument,” Philosophical Quarterly, 65(259): 241–253. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “Quantifier Variance and Indefinite Extensibility,” Philosophical Review, 126(1): 81–122. (Scholar)
- Weatherson, Brian, 2003, “Are You a Sim?” Philosophical Quarterly, 53(212): 425–431. (Scholar)
- Weiss, Bernard, 1996, “Anti-Realism, Truth-Value Links and Tensed Truth Predicates,” Mind, 105(420): 577–602. (Scholar)
- Williamson, Timothy, 2000, “Tennant on the Knowability of
Truth,” Ratio, 13(2): 99–114. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Wright, Crispin, 1984, “Kripke’s Account of the
Argument against Private Language,” Journal of
Philosophy, 81: 759–78. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, Realism, Meaning and Truth, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992a, Truth and Objectivity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992b, “On Putnam’s Proof That
We Are Not Brains in a Vat,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society, 92(1): 67–94. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Truth as Sort of Epistemic:
Putnam’s Peregrinations,” Journal of Philosophy,
97(6): 335–364. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Truth: A Traditional Debate Reviewed,” in Blackburn and Simmons (eds.) 2000, 203–238. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “Minimalism, Deflationism,
Pragmatism, Pluralism,” in Lynch (ed.) 2001, 751–787. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “(Anti-)Sceptics Simple and
Subtle,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65
(2): 330–348. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002a, “The Conceivability of Naturalism” in T. Szabo Gendler and J. Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, Saving the Differences: Essays on Themes from Truth and Objectivity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Scholar)