Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Analogy and Analogical Reasoning" by Paul Bartha
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Achinstein, P., 1964, “Models, Analogies and Theories,” Philosophy of Science, 31: 328–349. (Scholar)
- Agassi, J., 1964, “Discussion: Analogies as Generalizations,” Philosophy of Science, 31: 351–356. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, “Analogies Hard and Soft,” in D.H. Helman (ed.) 1988, 401–19. (Scholar)
- Aristotle, 1984, The Complete Works of Aristotle, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Ashley, K.D., 1990, Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books. (Scholar)
- Bailer-Jones, D., 2002, “Models, Metaphors and Analogies,” in Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science, P. Machamer and M. Silberstein (eds.), 108–127, Cambridge: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Bartha, P., 2010, By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bermejo-Luque, L., 2012, “A unitary schema for arguments by analogy,” Informal Logic, 11(3): 161–172.
- Biela, A., 1991, Analogy in Science, Frankfurt: Peter Lang. (Scholar)
- Black, M., 1962, Models and Metaphors, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Campbell, N.R., 1920, Physics: The Elements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1957, Foundations of Science, New York: Dover. (Scholar)
- Carbonell, J.G., 1983, “Learning by Analogy: Formulating and Generalizing Plans from Past Experience,” in Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, vol. 1, R. Michalski, J. Carbonell and T. Mitchell (eds.), 137–162, Palo Alto: Tioga. (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, “Derivational Analogy: A Theory of Reconstructive Problem Solving and Expertise Acquisition,” in Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, vol. 2, J. Carbonell, R. Michalski, and T. Mitchell (eds.), 371–392, Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Carnap, R., 1980, “A Basic System of Inductive Logic Part II,” in Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, vol. 2, R.C. Jeffrey (ed.), 7–155, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, N., 1992, “Aristotelian Natures and the Modern Experimental Method,” in Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations, J. Earman (ed.), Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Christensen, D., 1999, “Measuring Confirmation,” Journal of Philosophy 96(9): 437–61. (Scholar)
- Cohen, L. J., 1980, “Some Historical Remarks on the Baconian Conception of Probability,” Journal of the History of Ideas 41: 219–231. (Scholar)
- Copi, I., 1961, Introduction to Logic, 2nd edition, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Copi, I. and C. Cohen, 2005, Introduction to Logic, 12th edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
- Cross, R. and J.W. Harris, 1991, Precedent in English Law, 4th ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Currie, A., 2013, “Convergence as Evidence,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64: 763–86. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “Ethnographic analogy, the comparative method, and archaeological special pleading,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 55: 84–94. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, Rock, Bone and Ruin, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Dardashti, R., K. Thébault, and E. Winsberg, 2017, “Confirmation via Analogue Simulation: What Dumb Holes Could Tell Us about Gravity,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68: 55–89. (Scholar)
- Darwin, C., 1903, More Letters of Charles Darwin, vol. I, F. Darwin (ed.), New York: D. Appleton. (Scholar)
- Davies, T.R., 1988, “Determination, Uniformity, and Relevance: Normative Criteria for Generalization and Reasoning by Analogy,” in D.H. Helman (ed.) 1988, 227–50. (Scholar)
- Davies, T.R. and S. Russell, 1987, “A Logical Approach to Reasoning by Analogy,” in IJCAI 87: Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, J. McDermott (ed.), 264–70, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- De Finetti, B., 1974, Theory of Probability, vols. 1 and 2, trans. A. Machí and A. Smith, New York: Wiley. (Scholar)
- De Finetti, B. and L.J. Savage, 1972, “How to Choose the Initial Probabilities,” in B. de Finetti, Probability, Induction and Statistics, 143–146, New York: Wiley. (Scholar)
- Descartes, R., 1637/1954, The Geometry of René Descartes, trans. D.E. Smith and M.L. Latham, New York: Dover. (Scholar)
- Douven, I. and T. Williamson, 2006, “Generalizing the Lottery Paradox,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57: 755–779. (Scholar)
- Eliasmith, C. and P. Thagard, 2001, “Integrating structure and meaning: a distributed model of analogical mapping,” Cognitive Science 25: 245–286. (Scholar)
- Evans, T.G., 1968, “A Program for the Solution of Geometric-Analogy Intelligence-Test Questions,” in M.L. Minsky (ed.), 271–353, Semantic Information Processing, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Falkenhainer, B., K. Forbus, and D. Gentner, 1989/90, “The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples,” Artificial Intelligence 41: 2–63. (Scholar)
- Forbus, K, 2001, “Exploring Analogy in the Large,” in D. Gentner, K. Holyoak, and B. Kokinov (eds.) 2001, 23–58. (Scholar)
- Forbus, K., R. Ferguson, and D. Gentner, 1994, “Incremental Structure-mapping,” in Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, A. Ram and K. Eiselt (eds.), 313–18, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Scholar)
- Forbus, K., C. Riesbeck, L. Birnbaum, K. Livingston, A. Sharma, and L. Ureel, 2007, “A prototype system that learns by reading simplified texts,” in AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Reading, Stanford University, California.
- Forbus, K., J. Usher, A. Lovett, K. Lockwood, and J. Wetzel, 2008, “Cogsketch: Open domain sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, Annecy, France. (Scholar)
- Forbus, K., R. Ferguson, A. Lovett, and D. Gentner, 2017, “Extending SME to Handle Large-Scale Cognitive Modeling,” Cognitive Science, 41(5): 1152–1201. (Scholar)
- Franklin, B., 1941, Benjamin Franklin’s Experiments, I.B. Cohen (ed.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Fraser, D., forthcoming, “The development of renormalization group methods for particle physics: Formal analogies between classical statistical mechanics and quantum field theory,” Synthese, first online 29 June 2018. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1862-0 (Scholar)
- Galilei, G., 1610 [1983], The Starry Messenger, S. Drake (trans.) in Telescopes, Tides and Tactics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Gentner, D., 1983, “Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy,” Cognitive Science 7: 155–70. (Scholar)
- Gentner, D., K. Holyoak, and B. Kokinov (eds.), 2001, The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Gildenhuys, P., 2004, “Darwin, Herschel, and the role of analogy in Darwin’s Origin,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35: 593–611. (Scholar)
- Gould, R.A. and P.J. Watson, 1982, “A Dialogue on the Meaning and Use of Analogy in Ethnoarchaeological Reasoning,” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 355–381. (Scholar)
- Govier, T., 1999, The Philosophy of Argument, Newport News, VA: Vale Press. (Scholar)
- Guarini, M., 2004, “A Defence of Non-deductive Reconstructions of Analogical Arguments,” Informal Logic, 24(2): 153–168. (Scholar)
- Hadamard, J., 1949, An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Hájek, A., 2018, “Creating heuristics for philosophical creativity,” in Creativity and Philosophy, B. Gaut and M. Kieran (eds.), New York: Routledge, 292–312. (Scholar)
- Halpern, J. Y., 2003, Reasoning About Uncertainty, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Harrod, R.F., 1956, Foundations of Inductive Logic, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Hawthorne, J., 2012, “Inductive Logic”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL= <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/logic-inductive/>. (Scholar)
- Helman, D.H. (ed.), 1988, Analogical Reasoning: perspectives of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
- Hempel, C.G., 1965, “Aspects of Scientific Explanation,” in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, 331–496, New York: Free Press. (Scholar)
- Hesse, M.B., 1964, “Analogy and Confirmation Theory,” Philosophy of Science, 31: 319–327. (Scholar)
- –––, 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, “Logic of discovery in Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory,” in Foundations of scientific method: the nineteenth century, R. Giere and R. Westfall (eds.), 86–114, Bloomington: University of Indiana Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1974, The Structure of Scientific Inference, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, “Theories, Family Resemblances and Analogy,” in D.H. Helman (ed.) 1988, 317–40. (Scholar)
- Hofstadter, D., 1995, Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies, New York: BasicBooks (Harper Collins). (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “Epilogue: Analogy as the Core of Cognition,” in Gentner, Holyoak, and Kokinov (eds.) 2001, 499–538. (Scholar)
- Hofstadter, D., and E. Sander, 2013, Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Holyoak, K. and P. Thagard, 1989, “Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction,” Cognitive Science, 13: 295–355. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Huber, F., 2009, “Belief and Degrees of Belief,” in F. Huber and C. Schmidt-Petri (eds.) 2009, 1–33. (Scholar)
- Huber, F. and C. Schmidt-Petri, 2009, Degrees of Belief, Springer, 2009, (Scholar)
- Hume, D. 1779/1947, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. (Scholar)
- Hummel, J. and K. Holyoak, 1997, “Distributed Representations of Structure: A Theory of Analogical Access and Mapping,” Psychological Review 104(3): 427–466. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization,” Psychological Review 110: 220–264.
- Hunter, D. and P. Whitten (eds.), 1976, Encyclopedia of Anthropology, New York: Harper & Row. (Scholar)
- Huygens, C., 1690/1962, Treatise on Light, trans. S. Thompson, New York: Dover. (Scholar)
- Indurkhya, B., 1992, Metaphor and Cognition, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
- Jeffreys, H., 1973, Scientific Inference, 3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Keynes, J.M., 1921, A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Knuuttila, T., and A. Loettgers, 2014, “Varieties of noise: Analogical reasoning in synthetic biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 48: 76–88. (Scholar)
- Kokinov, B., K. Holyoak, and D. Gentner (eds.), 2009, New Frontiers in Analogy Research: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy ANALOGY-2009, Sofia: New Bulgarian University Press. (Scholar)
- Kraus, M., 2015, “Arguments by Analogy (and What We Can Learn about Them from Aristotle),” in Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory, F.H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (eds.), Cham: Springer, 171–182. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_13 (Scholar)
- Kroes, P., 1989, “Structural analogies between physical systems,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40: 145–54. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, T.S., 1996, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kuipers, T., 1988, “Inductive Analogy by Similarity and Proximity,” in D.H. Helman (ed.) 1988, 299–313. (Scholar)
- Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson, 1980, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Leatherdale, W.H., 1974, The Role of Analogy, Model, and Metaphor in Science, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing. (Scholar)
- Lee, H.S. and Holyoak, K.J., 2008, “Absence Makes the Thought Grow Stronger: Reducing Structural Overlap Can Increase Inductive Strength,” in Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, V. Sloutsky, B. Love, and K. McRae (eds.), 297–302, Austin: Cognitive Science Society. (Scholar)
- Lembeck, F., 1989, Scientific Alternatives to Animal Experiments, Chichester: Ellis Horwood. (Scholar)
- Levi, E., 1949, An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Linnemann, N., and M. Visser, 2018, “Hints towards the emergent nature of gravity,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 30: 1–13. (Scholar)
- Liston, M., 2000, “Critical Discussion of Mark Steiner’s The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem,” Philosophia Mathematica, 3(8): 190–207. (Scholar)
- Llewellyn, K., 1960, The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and its Study, New York: Oceana. (Scholar)
- Lloyd, G.E.R., 1966, Polarity and Analogy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Macagno, F., D. Walton and C. Tindale, 2017, “Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions,” Argumentation, 31: 221–243. (Scholar)
- Maher, P., 2000, “Probabilities for Two Properties,” Erkenntnis, 52: 63–91. (Scholar)
- Maier, C.L., 1981, The Role of Spectroscopy in the Acceptance of the Internally Structured Atom 1860–1920, New York: Arno Press. (Scholar)
- Maxwell, J.C., 1890, Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, Vol. I, W.D. Niven (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- McKay, C.P., 1993, “Did Mars once have Martians?” Astronomy, 21(9): 26–33. (Scholar)
- McMullin, Ernan, 1993, “Rationality and Paradigm Change in Science,” in World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, P. Horwich (ed.), 55–78, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Mill, J.S., 1843/1930, A System of Logic, London: Longmans-Green. (Scholar)
- Mitchell, M., 1993, Analogy-Making as Perception, Cambridge: Bradford Books/MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Moore, B. N. and R. Parker, 1998, Critical Thinking, 5th ed., Mountain View, CA: Mayfield. (Scholar)
- Nersessian, N., 2002, “Maxwell and ‘the Method of Physical Analogy’: Model-Based Reasoning, Generic Abstraction, and Conceptual Change,” in Reading Natural Philosophy, D. Malament (ed.), Chicago: Open Court. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Conceptual Change: Creativity, Cognition, and Culture,” in Models of Discovery and Creativity, J. Meheus and T. Nickles (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer 127–166. (Scholar)
- Niiniluoto, I., 1988, “Analogy and Similarity in Scientific Reasoning,” in D.H. Helman (ed.) 1988, 271–98. (Scholar)
- Norton, J., 2010, “There Are No Universal Rules for Induction,” Philosophy of Science, 77: 765–777. (Scholar)
- Ortony, A. (ed.), 1979, Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Oppenheimer, R., 1955, “Analogy in Science,” American Psychologist 11(3): 127–135. (Scholar)
- Pietarinen, J., 1972, Lawlikeness, Analogy and Inductive Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Scholar)
- Poincaré, H., 1952a, Science and Hypothesis, trans. W.J. Greenstreet, New York: Dover. (Scholar)
- –––, 1952b, Science and Method, trans. F. Maitland, New York: Dover. (Scholar)
- Polya, G., 1954, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, 2nd ed. 1968, two vols., Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Prieditis, A. (ed.), 1988, Analogica, London: Pitman. (Scholar)
- Priestley, J., 1769, 1775/1966, The History and Present State of Electricity, Vols. I and II, New York: Johnson. Reprint. (Scholar)
- Quine, W.V., 1969, “Natural Kinds,” in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 114–138, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
- Quine, W.V. and J.S. Ullian, 1970, The Web of Belief, New York: Random House. (Scholar)
- Radin, M., 1933, “Case Law and Stare Decisis,” Columbia Law Review 33 (February), 199. (Scholar)
- Reid, T., 1785/1895, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. The Works of Thomas Reid, vol. 3, 8th ed., Sir William Hamilton (ed.), Edinburgh: James Thin. (Scholar)
- Reiss, J., 2015, “A Pragmatist Theory of Evidence,” Philosophy of Science, 82: 341–62. (Scholar)
- Reynolds, A.K. and L.O. Randall, 1975, Morphine and Related Drugs, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
- Richards, R.A., 1997, “Darwin and the inefficacy of artificial selection,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 28(1): 75–97. (Scholar)
- Robinson, D.S., 1930, The Principles of Reasoning, 2nd ed., New York: D. Appleton. (Scholar)
- Romeijn, J.W., 2006, “Analogical Predictions for Explicit Similarity,” Erkenntnis, 64(2): 253–80. (Scholar)
- Russell, S., 1986, Analogical and Inductive Reasoning, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, “Analogy by Similarity,” in D.H. Helman (ed.) 1988, 251–269. (Scholar)
- Salmon, W., 1967, The Foundations of Scientific Inference, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “Rationality and Objectivity in Science, or Tom Kuhn Meets Tom Bayes,” in Scientific Theories (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Volume 14), C. Wade Savage (ed.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 175–204. (Scholar)
- Sanders, K., 1991, “Representing and Reasoning about Open-Textured Predicates,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, New York: Association of Computing Machinery, 137–144. (Scholar)
- Schlimm, D., 2008, “Two Ways of Analogy: Extending the Study of Analogies to Mathematical Domains,” Philosophy of Science, 75: 178–200. (Scholar)
- Shelley, C., 1999, “Multiple Analogies in Archaeology,” Philosophy of Science, 66: 579–605. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, Multiple Analogies in Science and Philosophy, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
- Shimony, A., 1970, “Scientific Inference,” in The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, R. Colodny (ed.), Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 79–172. (Scholar)
- Snyder, L., 2006, Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Spohn, W., 2009, “A Survey of Ranking Theory,” in F. Huber and C. Schmidt-Petri (eds.) 2009, 185-228. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, The Laws of Belief: Ranking Theory and its Philosophical Applications, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Stebbing, L.S., 1933, A Modern Introduction to Logic, 2nd edition, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
- Steiner, M., 1989, “The Application of Mathematics to Natural Science,” Journal of Philosophy, 86: 449–480. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Stepan, N., 1996, “Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science,” in Feminism and Science, E.G. Keller and H. Longino (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 121–136. (Scholar)
- Sterrett, S., 2006, “Models of Machines and Models of Phenomena,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 20(March): 69–80. (Scholar)
- Sunstein, C., 1993, “On Analogical Reasoning,” Harvard Law Review, 106: 741–791. (Scholar)
- Thagard, P., 1989, “Explanatory Coherence,” Behavioral and Brain Science, 12: 435–502. (Scholar)
- Timoshenko, S. and J. Goodier, 1970, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd edition, New York: McGraw-Hill. (Scholar)
- Toulmin, S., 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Turney, P., 2008, “The Latent Relation Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Experiments,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 33: 615–55. (Scholar)
- Unruh, W., 1981, “Experimental Black-Hole Evaporation?,” Physical Review Letters, 46: 1351–3. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Dumb Holes: Analogues for Black Holes,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366: 2905–13. (Scholar)
- Van Fraassen, Bas, 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, “Belief and the Will,” Journal of Philosophy, 81: 235–256. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, Laws and Symmetry, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Belief and the Problem of Ulysses and the Sirens,” Philosophical Studies, 77: 7–37. (Scholar)
- Waller, B., 2001, “Classifying and analyzing analogies,” Informal Logic, 21(3): 199–218. (Scholar)
- Walton, D. and C. Hyra, 2018, “Analogical Arguments in Persuasive and Deliberative Contexts,” Informal Logic, 38(2): 213–261. (Scholar)
- Weitzenfeld, J.S., 1984, “Valid Reasoning by Analogy,” Philosophy of Science, 51: 137–49. (Scholar)
- Woods, J., A. Irvine, and D. Walton, 2004, Argument: Critical Thinking, Logic and the Fallacies, 2nd edition, Toronto: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
- Wylie, A., 1982, “An Analogy by Any Other Name Is Just as Analogical,” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1: 382–401. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, “The Reaction Against Analogy,” Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8: 63–111. (Scholar)
- Wylie, A., and R. Chapman, 2016, Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology, Bloomsbury Academic. (Scholar)
