Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Defeasible Reasoning" by Robert Koons
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Adams, Ernest W., 1975, The Logic of Conditionals, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P. and Makinson, D., 1982, “On the logic of theory change: contraction functions and their associated revision functions”, Theoria, 48: 14–37. (Scholar)
- Arló Costa, Horacio and Parikh, Rohit, 2005, “Conditional Probability and Defeasible Inference”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 34: 97–119. (Scholar)
- Armstrong, David M., 1983, What is a law of nature?, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, A world of states of affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Asher, Nicholas, 1992, “A Truth Conditional, Default Semantics for Progressive”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 15: 469–508. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Commonsense Entailment: a logic for some conditionals”, in Conditionals in Artificial Intelligence, G. Crocco, L. Farinas del Cerro, and A. Hertzig (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Asher, Nicholas and Daniel Bonevac, 1996, “Prima Facie Obligations”, Studia Logica, 57: 19–45. (Scholar)
- Asher, Nicholas, and Alex Lascarides, 2003, Logics of Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Asher, N.. and Y. Mao, 2001, “Negated Defaults in Commonsense Entailment”, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 30: 4–60. (Scholar)
- Asher, Nicholas, and Michael Morreau, 1991, “Commonsense Entailment: A Modal, Nonmonotonic Theory of Reasoning”, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, John Mylopoulos and Ray Reiter (eds.), San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Asher, N., and F.J. Pelletier, 1997, “Generics and Defaults”, in Handbook of Logic and Language, J. van Bentham and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier. (Scholar)
- Ashley, Kevin D., 1990, Modeling legal argument: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Baker, A. B., 1988, “A simple solution to the Yale shooting problem”, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Ronald J. Brachman, Hector Levesque and Ray Reiter (eds.), San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Bamber, Donald, 2000, “Entailment with Near Surety of Scaled Assertions of High Conditional Probability”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 29: 1–74. (Scholar)
- Baroni, Pietro, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Beishui Liao, 2018, “Locality and Modularity in Abstract Argumentation”, in P. Baroni, D. Gabbay, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Leendert van der Torre (eds.), The Handbook of Formal Argumentation, London: College Publications, 937–979. (Scholar)
- Bench-Capon, T. J. M., H. Prakken, and G Sartor, 2009, “Argumentation in legal reasoning”, in I. Rahwan and G. R. Simari (eds.), Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 363–382. (Scholar)
- Bex, F. J., 2011, Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: A formal hybrid theory, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Bex, F. J., P. van Koppen, H. Prakken, and B. Verheij, 2010, “A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence”, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 18(2): 123–152.
- Bochman, Alexander, 2001, A Logical Theory of Nonmonotonic Inference and Belief Change, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
- Bodanza, Gustavo A. and F. Tohmé, 2005, “Local Logics, Non-Monotonicity and Defeasible Argumentation”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 14: 1–12. (Scholar)
- Bonevac, Daniel, 2003, Deduction: Introductory Symbolic Logic, Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2nd edition. (Scholar)
- Carnap, Rudolf, 1962, Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Carnap, Rudolf and Richard C. Jeffrey, 1980, Studies in inductive logic and probability, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, Nancy, 1983, How the laws of physics lie, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Chisholm, Roderick, 1957, Perceiving, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1963, “Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic”, Analysis, 24: 33–36. (Scholar)
- –––, 1966, Theory of Knowledge, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
- Dancy, Jonathan, 1993, Moral Reasons, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Ethics without Principles, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Delgrande, J. P., 1987, “A first-order conditional logic for prototypical properties”, Artificial Intelligence, 33: 105–130.
- Dung, Phan Minh, 1995, “On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning logic programming and n-person games”, Artificial Intelligence, 77: 321–357. (Scholar)
- Dung, Phan Minh and Phan Minh Thang, 2010, “Towards (probabilistic) argumentation for jury-based dispute resolution”, in P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, and G. R. Simari (eds.), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, Amsterdam: Ios Press, 171–182). (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities”, Artificial Intelligence, 255: 1–42. (Scholar)
- Etherington, D. W. and R. Reiter, 1983, “On Inheritance Hierarchies and Exceptions”, in Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Altos, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Ferraris, Paolo, 2007, “A Logic Programming Characterization of Causal Theories”, Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Ferraris, Paolo, with J. Lee, Y. Lierler, V. Lifschitz, and F. Yang, 2012, “Representing first-order causal theories by logic programs”, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 12(3): 383–412. (Scholar)
- Fierens, D, G. van den Broeck, J. Renkens, D. Shterionov, B. Guttman, I. Thon, G. Janssens, and L. de Readt, 2015, “Inference and learning in probabilistic logic using weighted Boolean formulas”, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 15(03): 358–401. (Scholar)
- Freund, M., with D. Lehmann, and D. Makinson, 1990, “Canonical extensions to the infinite case of finitary nonmonotonic inference relations”, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, G. Brewka and H. Freitag (eds.), Sankt Augustin: Gesellschaft für Mathematic und Datenverarbeitung mbH. (Scholar)
- Freund, M., 1993, “Injective models and disjunctive relations”, Journal of Logic and Computation, 3: 231–347. (Scholar)
- Gabbay, D. M., 1985, “Theoretical foundations for non-monotonic reasoning in expert systems”, in Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems, K. R. Apt (ed.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
- Gaifman, Haim, 1988, “A theory of higher-order probabilities”, in Causation, Chance and Credence, Brian Skyrms and William Harper (eds.), London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario Press.
- Gärdenfors, P., 1978, “Conditionals and Changes of Belief”, Acta Fennica, 30: 381–404. (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, “Belief revisions and the Ramsey test for conditionals”, Philosophical Review, 95: 81–93. (Scholar)
- Geffner, H. A., 1992, Default Reasoning: Causal and Conditional Theories, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Geffner, H. A., and J. Pearl, 1992, “Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence, 53: 209–244. (Scholar)
- Gelfond, Michael and Yulia Kahl, 2014, Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and the Design of Intelligent Agents: The Answer-Set Programming Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Gelfond, Michael and Leone, N., 2002, “Logic programming and knowledge representation—the A-prolog perspective”, Artificial Intelligence, 138: 37–38. (Scholar)
- Gelfond, Michael and Lifschitz, Vladimir, 1988, “The stable model semantics for logic programming”, Logic Programming: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference and Symposium, Robert A. Kowalski and Kenneth A. Bowen (eds.), Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp. 1070–1080. (Scholar)
- Gilio, Angelo, 2005, “Probabilistic Logic under Coherence, Conditional Interpretations, and Default Reasoning”, Synthese, 146: 139–152. (Scholar)
- Ginsberg, M. L., 1987, Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Giunchiglia, E., with J. Lee, V. Lifschitz, N. McCain, and H. Turner, 2004, “Nonmonotonic Causal Theories”, Artificial Intelligence, 153: 49–104. (Scholar)
- Goldszmidt, M. and J. Pearl, 1992, “Rank-Based Systems: A Simple Approach to Belief Revision, Belief Update, and Reasoning about Evidence and Action”, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Goldszmidt, M., with P. Morris, and J. Pearl, 1993, “A maximum entropy approach to nonmonotonic reasoning”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15: 220–232.
- Grove, A., 1988, “Two modellings for theory change”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17: 157–170. (Scholar)
- Hage, J. C., 1997, Reasoning with rules: An essay on legal reasoning and its underlying logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law”, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 8: 137–172. (Scholar)
- Hanks, Steve and Drew McDermott, 1987, “Nonmonotonic Logic and Temporal Projection”, Artificial Intelligence, 33: 379–412. (Scholar)
- Hansson, B., 1969, “An analysis of some deontic logics”, Noûs, 3: 373–398. (Scholar)
- Hansson, S. O. and Makinson, D., 1997, “Applying normative rules with restraint”, in Logic and Scientific Methods, M. Dalla Chiara (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Harper, W. L., 1976, “Rational Belief Change, Popper Functions and Counterfactuals”, in Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, Volume I, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Hart, H. L. A., 1949, “The ascription of responsibility and rights”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 49(1): 171–194. (Scholar)
- Hawthorne, James, 1998, “On the Logic of Nonmonotonic Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities: Predicate Logic”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 27: 1–34. (Scholar)
- Horty, J. F., with R.H. Thomason, and D.S. Touretzky, 1990, “A sceptical theory of inheritance in nonmonotonic semantic networks”, Artificial Intelligence, 42: 311–348.
- Horty, John, 1994, “Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 23: 35–65. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Reasoning with moral conflicts”, Noûs, 37: 557–605. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007a, “Defaults with Priorities”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 36: 367–413. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007b, “Reasons as defaults”, Philosophers’ Imprints, 7: 1–28. (Scholar)
- Hunter, Anthony, 2013, “A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 54(1): 47–81.
- –––, “Reasoning with Inconsistent Knowledge using the Epistemic Approach to Probabilistic Argumentation”, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’20), Palo Alto: AAAI Press. (Scholar)
- Israel, David, 1986, “What’s Wrong with Non-monotonic Logic”, in Proceedings of the First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto: AAAI Press. (Scholar)
- Karacapilidis, N., and D. Papadias, 2001, “Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system”, Information Systems, 26: 259–277. (Scholar)
- Konolige, Kurt, 1994, “Autoepistemic Logic”, in Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Volume III: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, D. M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger, and J. A. Robinson (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Koons, Robert C., 2000, Realism Regained: An Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology and the Mind, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “Defeasible Reasoning, Special Pleading and the Cosmological Argument: Reply to Oppy”, Faith and Philosophy, 18: 192–203. (Scholar)
- Kraus, S., with D. Lehmann, and M. Magidor, 1990, “Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Preferential Models and Cumulative Logics”, Artificial Intelligence, 44: 167–207. (Scholar)
- Kyburg, Henry E., 1983, Epistemology and Inference, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Lance, Mark and Margaret Little, 2004, “Defeasibility and the normative grasp of context”, Erkenntnis, 61: 435–55. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Where the laws are”, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 2: 149–171. (Scholar)
- Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher, 1993, “Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 16: 437–493. (Scholar)
- Lee, Joohyung and Yi Wang, 2016, “Weighted Rules under the Stable Model Semantics”, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2016), Palo Alto: AAAI Press, pp. 145–154. (Scholar)
- Lehmann, D., and M. Magidor, 1992, “What does a conditional knowledge base entail?”, Artificial Intelligence, 55: 1–60. (Scholar)
- Levesque, H., 1990, “A study in autoepistemic logic”, Artificial Intelligence, 42: 263–309.
- Lewis, David K., 1973, Counterfactuals, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Liao, Beishui, Li Jin, and Robert C. Koons, 2011, “Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method”, Artificial Intelligence, 175(11): 1790–1814. (Scholar)
- Liao, Beishui, Nir Oren, Leendert van der Torre, and Serena Villata, 2019, “Prioritized Norms in Formal Argumentation”, Journal of Logic and Computation, 29(2): 215–240. (Scholar)
- Lifschitz, V., 1988, “Circumscriptive theories: a logic-based framework for knowledge representation”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17: 391–441. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Benchmark Problems for Formal Nonmonotonic Reasoning”, in Non-Monotonic Reasoning, M. Reinfrank, J. de Kleer, M. L. Ginsberg and E. Sandewall (eds.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “Frames in the space of situations”, Artificial Intelligence, 46: 365–376. (Scholar)
- Lin, Fangzhen, 1995, “Embracing causality in specifying the indirect effects of actions”, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 1985–1993. (Scholar)
- Lin, Fangzhen, and Robert Reiter, 1994, “State constraints revisited”, Journal of Logic and Computation, 4: 655–678. (Scholar)
- Lukasiewicz, Thomas, 2005, “Nonmonotonic Probabilistic Reasoning under Variable-Strength Inheritance with Overriding”, Synthese, 146: 153–169. (Scholar)
- McCain, Norman and Hudson Turner, 1997, “Causal theories of action and change”, in Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp. 460–5. (Scholar)
- McCarthy, John M. and Patrick J. Hayes, 1969, “Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence”, in Machine Intelligence 4, B. Meltzer and D. Mitchie (eds.), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, “Epistemological Problems of Artificial Intelligence”, in Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pittsburgh: Computer Science Department, Carnegie-Mellon University. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, “Circumscription — A Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence, 13: 27–39, 171–177. (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, “Application of Circumscription to Formalizing Common-Sense Knowledge”, Artificial Intelligence, 28: 89–111. (Scholar)
- McDermott, Drew and Jon Doyle, 1982, “Non-Monotonic Logic I”, Artificial Intelligence, 13: 41–72. (Scholar)
- Makinson, David, 1994, “General Patterns in Nonmonotonic Reasoning”, in Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Volume III: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, D. M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger, and J. A. Robinson (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, Bridges from Classical to Nonmonotonic Logic, London: King’s College Publications. (Scholar)
- Makinson, David and Gärdenfors, Peter, 1991, “Relations between the logic of theory change and Nonmonotonic Logic”, in Logic of Theory Change, A. Fuhrmann and M. Morreau (eds.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
- Makinson, David and van der Torre, L., 2000, “Input/output logics”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 29: 155–85. (Scholar)
- Morgan, Charles, 2000, “The Nature of Nonmonotonic Reasoning”, Minds and Machines, 10: 321–360. (Scholar)
- Moore, Robert C., 1985, “Semantic Considerations on Nonmonotonic Logic”, Artificial Intelligence, 25: 75–94. (Scholar)
- Morreau, M., and N. Asher, 1995, “What some generic sentences mean”, in The Generic Book, J. Pelletier (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Nayak, A. C., 1994, “Iterated belief change based on epistemic entrenchment”, Erkenntnis, 41: 353–390. (Scholar)
- Nute, Donald, 1988, “Conditional Logic”, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume II: Extensions of Classical Logic, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, Defeasible Deontic Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Pearl, Judea, 1988, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “System Z: A Natural Ordering of Defaults with Tractable Applications to Default Reasoning”, Proceedings of the Third Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, Rohit Parikh (ed.), San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Pelletier, F. J. and R. Elio, “On Relevance in Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Some Empirical Studies”, in R. Greiner & D. Subramanian (eds) Relevance: AAAI 1994 Fall Symposium Series, Palo Alto: AAAI Press. (Scholar)
- Pollock, John L., 1967, “Criteria and our knowledge of the material world”, Philosophical Review, 76: 28–62. (Scholar)
- –––, 1970, “The structure of epistemic justification”, American Philosophical Quarterly (Monograph Series), 4: 62–78. (Scholar)
- –––, 1974, Knowledge and Justification, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Defeasible Reasoning”, Cognitive Science, 11: 481–518. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, Cognitive Carpentry, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Defeasible reasoning and degrees of justification”, Argument & Computation, 1(1): 7–22. (Scholar)
- Prakken, Henry, 2010, “An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments”, Argument and Computation, 1: 93–124. (Scholar)
- Prakken, Henry and Giovanni Sartor, 1995, “On the relation between legal language and legal argument: assumptions, applicability, and dynamic priorities”, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Law (ICAIL-95), New York: The ACM Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, “A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence and the Law, 4: 331–368.
- Prakken, H., and Vreeswijk, G. A. W., 2002, “Logics for defeasible argumentation”, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (2nd edition, Volume 4), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 219–318. (Scholar)
- Quine, Willard van Orman, and J.S. Ullian, 1982, The Web of Belief, New York: Random House. (Scholar)
- Raz, Joseph, 1975, Practical Reasoning and Norms, London: Hutchinson and Company. (Scholar)
- Reed, Christopher A. and Rowe, G. W. A., 2004, “Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation”, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 13(4): 961–979. (Scholar)
- Reiter, Ray, 1980, “A logic for default reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence, 13: 81–137.
- Richardson, M. and P. Domingos, 2006, “Markov logic networks”, Machine Learning, 62(1–3): 107–136. (Scholar)
- Ross, David, 1930, The Right and the Good, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1939, Foundations of Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Rott, Hans, 1989, “Conditionals and Theory Change: Revisions, Expansions and Additions”, Synthese, 81: 91–113. (Scholar)
- Schlechta, Karl, 1997, Nonmonotonic Logics: Basic Concepts, Results and Techniques, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
- Shoham, Yoav, 1987, “A Semantical Approach to Nonmonotonic Logic”, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, John McDermott (ed.), Los Altos, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Skyrms, Brian, 1980, “Higher order degrees of belief”, in Prospects for Pragmatism, Hugh Mellor (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Spohn, Wolfgang, 1988, “Ordinal Conditional Functions”, in Causation, Decision, Belief Change and Statistics, Volume III, W. L. Harper and B. Skyrms (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “A Brief Comparison of Pollock’s Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions”, Synthese, 13: 39–56. (Scholar)
- Tohmé, Fernando, with Claudio Delrieux and Otávio Bueno, 2011, “Defeasible Reasoning + Partial Models: A Formal Framework for the Methodology of Research Programs”, Foundations of Science, 16: 47–65. (Scholar)
- Toulmin, Stephen E., 1964, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Txurruka, I. and N. Asher, 2008, “A discourse-based approach to Natural Language Disjunction (revisited)”, in M. Aunargue, K. Korta and J. Lazzarabal (eds.), Language, Representation and Reasoning, University of the Basque Country Press. (Scholar)
- van der Torre, Leendert and Srdjan Vesic, 2018, “The Principle-Based Approach to Abstract Argumentation Semantics”, in P. Baroni, D. Gabbay, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Leendert van der Torre (eds.), The Handbook of Formal Argumentation, London: College Publications, 797–838. (Scholar)
- van Eemeron, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans, 2020, Handbook of Argumentation Theory, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. (Scholar)
- van Fraassen, Bas, 1973, “Values and the heart’s command”, The Journal of Philosophy, 70: 5–19. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Fine-grained opinion, probability, and the logic of folk belief”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24: 349–377. (Scholar)
- Verheij, B., 2003, “DefLog: On the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions”, Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3): 319–346. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, Virtual arguments: On the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers, The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Jumping to conclusions: A logico-probabilistic foundation for defeasible rule-based arguments”, in L. Fariñas del Cerro, A. Herzig & J. Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. 13th European conference, JELIA 2012, Dordrecht: Springer, 411–423. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “Proof with and without probabilities: Correct evidential reasoning with presumptive arguments, coherent hypotheses and degrees of uncertainty”, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25 (1): 127–154. (Scholar)
- Vieu, L., with M. Bras, N. Asher, and M. Aurnague, 2005, “Locating adverbials in discourse”, Journal of French Language Studies, 15(2): 173–193. (Scholar)
- Vreeswijk, Gerard, 1997, “Abstract argumentation systems”, Artificial Intelligence, 90: 225–27. (Scholar)
- Wobcke, Wayne, 1995, “Belief Revision, Conditional Logic and Nonmonotonic Reasoning”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 36: 55–103. (Scholar)
