Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Reasons for Action: Justification, Motivation, Explanation" by Maria Alvarez and Jonathan Way
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Alvarez, Maria, 2007, “The Causalist/Anti-Causalist Debate in the Theory of Action: What It Is and Why It Matters”, in Action in Context, Anton Leist (ed.), Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 103–123. doi:10.1515/9783110898798.103 (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Reasons and the Ambiguity of ‘Belief’”, Philosophical Explorations, 11(1): 53–65. doi:10.1080/13869790701772435 (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “How Many Kinds of Reasons?”, Philosophical Explorations, 12(2): 181–193. doi:10.1080/13869790902838514 (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550005.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Anderson, Elizabeth, 1993, Value in Ethics and Economics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Anscombe, G. E. M., 1957, Intention, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologiae, Thomas Gilby
(ed./trans), London: Blackfriars, 1960–73.
- Aristotle, The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford
Translation, Jonathan Barnes (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press, 1984.
- Arpaly, Nomy, 2002, “Moral Worth”, The Journal of Philosophy, 99(5): 223–245. doi:10.2307/3655647 (Scholar)
- Arpaly, Nomy and Timothy Schroeder, 2014, In Praise of Desire (Oxford Moral Theory), New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199348169.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Audi, Robert, 1993, Action, Intention, and Reason, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Austin, J.L, 1956, “Ifs and Cans”, Proceedings of the British Academy, 42: 109–132; reprinted in Philosophical Papers, 3rd edition, Austin, J.L, J.O.Urmson, and G.J. Warnock (eds), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979, 205–232. doi.org/10.1093/019283021X.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Bader, Ralf, 2016, “Conditions, Modifiers, and
Holism”, in
Lord and Maguire 2016:
27–55 (ch. 2).
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199315192.003.0002 (Scholar)
- Baier, Kurt, 1958, The Moral Point of View: A Rational Basis
of Ethics (Contemporary Philosophy), Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press. (Scholar)
- Bennett, Christopher, 2021, “The Problem of Expressive Action”, Philosophy, 96(2): 277–300. doi:10.1017/s0031819120000467 (Scholar)
- Berker, Selim, 2007, “Particular Reasons”, Ethics, 118(1): 109–139. doi:10.1086/521586 (Scholar)
- Bittner, Rüdiger, 2001, Doing Things for Reasons, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195143647.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Brown, Jessica, 2008, “Subject‐Sensitive Invariantism and the Knowledge Norm for Practical Reasoning”, Noûs, 42(2): 167–189. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00677.x (Scholar)
- Broome, John, 2013, Rationality through Reasoning (The Blackwell/Brown Lectures in Philosophy 4), Chichester/Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118609088 (Scholar)
- Brunero, John, 2013, “Reasons as Explanations”, Philosophical Studies, 165(3): 805–824. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9982-8 (Scholar)
- –––, 2019, “Fittingness and Good Reasoning”, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 16(2): 133–143. doi:10.26556/jesp.v16i2.782 (Scholar)
- Comesaña, Juan and Matthew McGrath, 2014, “Having False Reasons”, in Littlejohn and Turri 2014: 59–79. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660025.003.0004 (Scholar)
- Copp, David and David Sobel, 2002, “Desires, Motives, and Reasons: Scanlon’s Rationalistic Moral Psychology”, Social Theory and Practice, 28(2): 243–276. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract200228210 (Scholar)
- Cullity, Garrett, 2018, “Weighing Reasons”, in Star 2018b: 423–442 (ch. 18). (Scholar)
- Dancy, Jonathan, 1995, “Why There Is Really No Such Thing as the Theory of Motivation”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95(1): 1–18. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/95.1.1 (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, Practical Reality, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199253056.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Ethics without Principles,
Oxford: Clarendon. doi:10.1093/0199270023.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “On How to Act—Disjunctively”, in Haddock and MacPherson 2008: 262–280 (ch. 11). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0012 (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Acting in Ignorance”, Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 6(3): 345–357. doi:10.1007/s11466-011-0143-5 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “On Knowing One’s
Reason”, in
Littlejohn and Turri 2014:
80–96. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660025.003.0005 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, Practical Shape: A Theory of Practical Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198805441.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Darwall, Stephen L., 1983, Impartial Reason, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Davidson, Donald, 1963, “Actions, Reasons, and Causes”, The Journal of Philosophy, 60(23): 685–700; reprinted in his Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980, 3–21. doi:10.2307/2023177 (Scholar)
- Fantl, Jeremy and Matthew McGrath, 2009, Knowledge in an Uncertain World, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550623.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Finlay, Stephen, 2014, Confusion of Tongues: A Theory of Normative Language (Oxford Moral Theory), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199347490.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Fogal, Daniel and Alex Worsnip, 2021, “Which Reasons? Which Rationality?”, Ergo: an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 8: 306–343 (article 11). doi:10.3998/ergo.1148 (Scholar)
- Foot, Philippa, 1972, “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives”, The Philosophical Review, 81(3): 305–316. doi:10.2307/2184328 (Scholar)
- Gert, Joshua, 2003, “Two Concepts of Rationality”, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 41(3): 367–398. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2003.tb00958.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Normative Strength and the Balance of Reasons”, The Philosophical Review, 116(4): 533–562. doi:10.1215/00318108-2007-013 (Scholar)
- Gettier, Edmund L., 1963, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, Analysis, 23(6): 121–123. doi:10.1093/analys/23.6.121 (Scholar)
- Gibbons, John, 2010, “Things That Make Things Reasonable”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(2): 335–361. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00373.x (Scholar)
- Goldman, Alan H., 2009, Reasons from within: Desires and Values, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576906.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Goldman, Alvin I., 1967, “A Causal Theory of Knowing”, The Journal of Philosophy, 64(12): 357–372. doi:10.2307/2024268 (Scholar)
- Graham, Peter A., 2011, “‘Ought’ and Ability”, The Philosophical Review, 120(3): 337–382. doi:10.1215/00318108-1263674 (Scholar)
- Gregory, Alex, 2021, Desire as Belief: A Study of Desire, Motivation, and Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198848172.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Haddock, Adrian and Fiona MacPherson (eds), 2008,
Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, Oxford/New
York: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.001.0001
- Hampton, Jean, 1998, The Authority of Reason, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625213 (Scholar)
- Hawthorne, John, 2004, Knowledge and Lotteries, Oxford:
Clarendon. doi:10.1093/0199269556.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Hawthorne, John and Ofra Magidor, 2018, “Reflections on the
Ideology of Reasons”, in
Star 2018b:
113–140 (ch. 5). (Scholar)
- Heuer, Ulrike, 2004, “Reasons for Actions and Desires”, Philosophical Studies, 121(1): 43–63. doi:10.1023/b:phil.0000040381.54358.08 (Scholar)
- Hieronymi, Pamela, 2011, “Reasons for Action”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 111(3pt3): 407–427. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00316.x (Scholar)
- Hooker, Brad, 1987, “Williams’ Argument against External Reasons”, Analysis, 47(1): 42–44. doi:10.1093/analys/47.1.42 (Scholar)
- Hornsby, Jennifer, 2007, “Knowledge, Belief and Reasons for Acting”, in Explaining the Mental: Naturalist and Non-Naturalist Approaches to Mental Acts and Processes, Carlo Penco, Massimiliano Vignolo, and Michael Beaney (eds), Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 88–105. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “A Disjunctive Conception of Acting for Reasons”, in Haddock and MacPherson 2008: 244–261 (ch. 10). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0011 (Scholar)
- Horty, John Francis, 2012, Reasons as Defaults, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744077.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Howard, Nathan Robert, 2021, “Ambidextrous Reasons (or Why
Reasons First’s Reasons Aren’t Facts)”,
Philosopher’s Imprint, 21: article 30.
[Howard 2021 available online] (Scholar)
- Hursthouse, Rosalind, 1991, “Arational Actions”, The Journal of Philosophy, 88(2): 57–68. doi:10.2307/2026906 (Scholar)
- Hutcheson, Francis, 1728, An Essay on the Nature and Conduct
of the Passions, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, London;
second edition 1730, London; third edition 1742, London; reprinted in
Aaron Garrett (ed.), An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the
Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense,
Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002.
[Essay 1742 [2002] available online] (Scholar)
- Hyman, John, 1999, “How Knowledge Works”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 49(197): 433–451. doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00152 (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Acting for Reasons: Reply to Dancy”, Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 6(3): 358–368. doi:10.1007/s11466-011-0144-4 (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, Action, Knowledge, and Will, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735779.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Isserow, Jessica, 2019, “Moral Worth and Doing the Right Thing by Accident”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 97(2): 251–264. doi:10.1080/00048402.2018.1463270 (Scholar)
- Kearns, Stephen and Daniel Star, 2008, “Reasons: Explanations or Evidence?”, Ethics, 119(1): 31–56. doi:10.1086/592587 (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Reasons as Evidence”, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 4, Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 215–242 (ch. 8). doi:10.1093/oso/9780199566303.003.0009 (Scholar)
- Kiesewetter, Benjamin, 2016, “You Ought to ϕ Only If You May Believe That You Ought to ϕ”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 66(265): 760–782. doi:10.1093/pq/pqw012 (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, The Normativity of Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198754282.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2022, “Are All Practical Reasons Based on Value?”, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 17, Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–53 (ch. 2). doi:10.1093/oso/9780192865601.003.0002 (Scholar)
- Korsgaard, Christine M., 1986, “Skepticism about Practical Reason”, The Journal of Philosophy, 83(1): 5–25. doi:10.2307/2026464 (Scholar)
- ––– 1996, The Sources of Normativity, New York: Cambridge University Press, edited by Onora O’Neill. (Scholar)
- Littlejohn, Clayton and John Turri (eds), 2014,
Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief, and Assertion,
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660025.001.0001
- Locke, Dustin, 2015, “Knowledge, Explanation, and Motivating Reasons”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 52(3): 215–232. (Scholar)
- Lord, Errol, 2017, “On The Intellectual Conditions for Responsibility: Acting for the Right Reasons, Conceptualization, and Credit”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 95(2): 436–464. doi:10.1111/phpr.12306 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, The Importance of Being Rational, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198815099.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Lord, Errol and Barry Maguire, 2016a, “An Opinionated Guide to the Weight of Reasons”, in Lord and Maguire 2016: 3–24 (ch. 1). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199315192.003.0001 (Scholar)
- ––– (eds), 2016b, Weighing
Reasons, New York: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199315192.001.0001
- Mackie, J. L., 1977, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (Pelican Books: Philosophy), Harmondsworth/New York: Penguin. (Scholar)
- Maguire, Barry, 2016, “The Value-Based Theory of Reasons”, Ergo: an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 3: 233–262 (article 9). doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.009 (Scholar)
- Maguire, Barry and Justin Snedegar, 2021, “Normative Metaphysics for Accountants”, Philosophical Studies, 178(2): 363–384. doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01435-w (Scholar)
- Manne, Kate, 2014, Internalism about Reasons: Sad but True? Philosophical Studies, 167(1): 89–117. doi: 10.1007/s11098-013-0234-3 (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “Democratizing
Humeanism”, in
Lord and Maguire 2016:
123–140 (ch. 6).
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199315192.003.0006 (Scholar)
- McHugh, Conor and Jonathan Way, 2022, Getting Things Right: Fittingness, Reasons, and Value, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198810322.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Mantel, Susanne, 2014, “No Reason for Identity: On the Relation between Motivating and Normative Reasons”, Philosophical Explorations, 17(1): 49–62. doi:10.1080/13869795.2013.815261 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, Determined by Reasons: A Competence Account of Acting for a Normative Reason, New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351186353 (Scholar)
- Markovits, Julia, 2010, “Acting for the Right Reasons”, The Philosophical Review, 119(2): 201–242. doi:10.1215/00318108-2009-037 (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Why Be an Internalist about Reasons?”, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 6, Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 255–279 (ch. 11). (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, Moral Reason (Oxford Philosophical Monographs), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567171.001.0001 (Scholar)
- McDowell, John, 1978, “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 52: 13–29. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/52.1.13 (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Acting in the Light of a Fact”, in Thinking about Reasons: Themes from the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy, David Bakhurst, Brad Hooker, and Margaret Olivia Little (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–28 (ch. 1). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604678.003.0002 (Scholar)
- McElwee, Brian, 2011, “Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 14(4): 457–466. doi:10.1007/s10677-010-9256-5 (Scholar)
- McKeever, Sean and Michael Ridge, 2012, “Elusive Reasons”, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 7, Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 110–137 (ch. 4). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653492.003.0004 (Scholar)
- Mele, Alfred R., 2003, Motivation and Agency, Oxford/New
York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/019515617x.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Moss, Jessica Dawn, 2012, Aristotle on the Apparent Good: Perception, Phantasia, Thought, and Desire (Oxford Aristotle Studies), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656349.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Nagel, Thomas, 1970, The Possibility of Altruism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Nair, Shyam, 2021, “‘Adding Up’ Reasons: Lessons for Reductive and Nonreductive Approaches”, Ethics, 132(1): 38–88. doi:10.1086/715288 (Scholar)
- Nebel, Jacob M, 2019, “Normative Reasons as Reasons Why We Ought”, Mind, 128(510): 459–484. doi:10.1093/mind/fzy013 (Scholar)
- Neta, Ram, 2009, “Treating Something as a Reason for Action”, Noûs, 43(4): 684–699. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00724.x (Scholar)
- Oddie, Graham, 2005, Value, Reality, and Desire, Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/0199273413.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Paakkunainen, H. 2017, “Can There Be Government House Reasons for Action?,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 12: 56–93. (Scholar)
- Parfit, Derek, 2011, On What Matters (The Berkeley Tanner Lectures), Samuel Scheffler (ed.), 2 volumes, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Plato, Plato: Complete Works, John M. Cooper (ed.),
Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1997.
- Price, A. W., 2011, Virtue and Reason in Plato and Aristotle, Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609611.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Pryor, James, 2007, “Reasons and That‐Clauses”, Philosophical Issues, 17: 217–244. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2007.00131.x (Scholar)
- Quinn, Warren, 1993, “Putting Rationality in Its
Place”, in Value, Welfare, and Morality (Cambridge
Studies in Philosophy), R. G. Frey and Christopher W. Morris (eds.),
Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 26–50; reprinted
in his Morality and Action (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy),
Philippa Foot (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994,
228–255.
gvgtvdeljkhgjfhrcfbrlvrtbkgdbkdthidoi:10.1017/cbo9780511625022.004
doi:10.1017/CBO9781139172677.013 (Scholar)
- Raz, Joseph, 1975 [1990], Practical Reason and Norms (Hutchinson University Library), London: Hutchinson. Second edition, 1990, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1978, “Introduction”, in
Practical Reasoning, Joseph Raz (ed), New York: Oxford
University Press, 1–17. (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/0198248075.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Facing Up: A Reply”,
Southern California Law Review, 62(3/4):
1153–1236. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “The Active and the Passive”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 71: 211–227. Revised and reprinted, 1999, as “When We Are Ourselves: The Active and the Passive” in Raz 1999: 5–21. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00027 (1997 version) doi:10.1093/0199248001.003.0002 (1999 version) (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, Engaging Reason: On
the Theory of Value and Action, Oxford/New York: Oxford
University Press. doi:10.1093/0199248001.001.0001
- –––, 2001, Value, Respect, and Attachment (John Robert Seeley Lectures), Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612732 (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, From Normativity to Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693818.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Ross, W. D., 1939, Foundations of Ethics: The Gifford Lectures
Delivered in the University of Aberdeen, 1935–, Oxford: The
Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Rossi, Benjamin Cohen, 2021, “Elusive Reasons and the Motivational Constraint”, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 20(1): 82–110. doi:10.26556/jesp.v20i1.1210 (Scholar)
- Ruben, David-Hillel, 2009, “Con-Reasons as Causes”, in New Essays on the Explanation of Action, Constantine Sandis (ed.), London: Palgrave Macmillan, 62–74. doi:10.1057/9780230582972_5 (Scholar)
- Scanlon, Thomas, 1998, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, Being Realistic about Reasons, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678488.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Schafer, Karl, 2013, “Perception and the Rational Force of Desire”:, Journal of Philosophy, 110(5): 258–281. doi:10.5840/jphil2013110528 (Scholar)
- Schapiro, Tamar, 2009, “The Nature of Inclination”, Ethics, 119(2): 229–256. doi:10.1086/596469 (Scholar)
- Schroeder, Mark Andrew, 2007, Slaves of the Passions,
Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299508.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Having Reasons”, Philosophical Studies, 139(1): 57–71. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9102-3 (Scholar)
- –––, 2021, Reasons First, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198868224.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Schueler, G. F., 2003, Reasons and Purposes: Human Rationality
and the Teleological Explanation of Action, Oxford/New York:
Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199250375.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Setiya, Kieran, 2007, Reasons without Rationalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Sympathy for the Devil”, in Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.), Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 82–110 (ch. 5). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195382440.003.0005 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “What Is a Reason to Act?”, Philosophical Studies, 167(2): 221–235. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-0086-2 (Scholar)
- Sinhababu, Neil, 2017, Humean Nature: How Desire Explains Action, Thought, and Feeling, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783893.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Sinclair, Neil, 2016, “On the Connection between Normative Reasons and the Possibility of Acting for Those Reasons”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(5): 1211–1223. doi:10.1007/s10677-016-9731-8 (Scholar)
- Singh, Keshav, 2019, “Acting and Believing Under the Guise of Normative Reasons”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 99(2): 409–430. doi:10.1111/phpr.12497 (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, “Moral Worth, Credit, and Non-Accidentality”, in Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 10, Mark C Timmons (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 156–181. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198867944.003.0008 (Scholar)
- Skorupski, John, 2010, The Domain of Reasons, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587636.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Smith, Michael, 1994, The Moral Problem (Philosophical Theory), Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Snedegar, Justin, 2016, “Reasons, Oughts, and Requirements”, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 11, Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 155–181 (ch. 7). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198784647.003.0007 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Reasons for and Reasons Against”, Philosophical Studies, 175(3): 725–743. doi:10.1007/s11098-017-0889-2 (Scholar)
- Southwood, Nicholas, 2011, “The Moral/Conventional Distinction”, Mind, 120(479): 761–802. doi:10.1093/mind/fzr048 (Scholar)
- Star, Daniel, 2015, Knowing Better: Virtue, Deliberation, and Normative Ethics, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570416.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018a, “Reasoning with Reasons”, in Normativity: Epistemic and Practical, Conor McHugh, Jonathan Way, and Daniel Whiting (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 241–259 (ch. 12). (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2018b, The Oxford
Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, Oxford: Oxford University
Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.001.0001
- Stampe, Dennis W., 1987, “The Authority of Desire”, The Philosophical Review, 96(3): 335–381. doi:10.2307/2185225 (Scholar)
- Stocker, Michael, 1979, “Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology”, The Journal of Philosophy, 76(12): 738–753. doi:10.2307/2025856 (Scholar)
- Stout, Rowland, 1996, Things That Happen Because They Should: A Teleological Approach to Action (Oxford Philosophical Monographs), Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198240631.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Stoutland, Frederick, 1998, “The Real Reasons”, in Human Action, Deliberation and Causation, Jan Bransen and Stefaan E. Cuypers (eds), Dordrecht: Kluwer, 43–66. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5082-8_3 (Scholar)
- Street, Sharon, 2008, “Constructivism about Reasons”, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 3, by Russ Shafer-Landau, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 207–246. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199542062.003.0009 (Scholar)
- Sylvan, Kurt L., 2021, “Respect and the Reality of Apparent Reasons”, Philosophical Studies, 178(10): 3129–3156. doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01573-1 (Scholar)
- Tenenbaum, Sergio, 2007, “Critical Notice: Brute Requirements, Brute Rationality by Joshua Gert”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37(1): 153–171. doi:10.1353/cjp.2007.0013 (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Appearing Good: A Reply to Schroeder”, Social Theory and Practice, 34(1): 131–138. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract20083417 (Scholar)
- Thomson, Judith Jarvis, 1990, The Realm of Rights, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Tucker, Chris, 2022, “The Dual Scale Model of Weighing Reasons”, Noûs, 56(2): 366–392. doi:10.1111/nous.12361 (Scholar)
- Turri, John, 2009, “The Ontology of Epistemic Reasons”, Noûs, 43(3): 490–512. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00715.x (Scholar)
- Unger, Peter K., 1975, Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism (Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy), Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/0198244177.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Velleman, J. David, 1992, “The Guise of the Good”, Noûs, 26(1): 3–26. doi:10.2307/2215684 (Scholar)
- Wallace, R. Jay, 2003, “Explanation, Deliberation, and Reasons”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(2): 429–435. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00299.x (Scholar)
- Way, Jonathan, 2017, “Reasons as Premises of Good Reasoning”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98(2): 251–270. doi:10.1111/papq.12135 (Scholar)
- Way, Jonathan and Daniel Whiting, 2016, “Reasons and Guidance (Or, Surprise Parties and Ice Cream)”, Analytic Philosophy, 57(3): 214–235. doi:10.1111/phib.12086 (Scholar)
- Wedgwood, Ralph, 2015, “The Pitfalls of ‘Reasons’”, Philosophical Issues, 25: 123–143. doi:10.1111/phis.12054 (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, The Value of Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198802693.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Whiting, Daniel, 2021, The Range of Reasons: In Ethics and Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780192893956.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Williams, Bernard, 1979, “Internal and External Reasons”, in Rational Action: Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, Ross Harrison (ed.), Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 17–28; reprinted in Williams 1981: 101–113. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, Moral Luck:
Philosophical Papers, 1973–1980, Cambridge/New York:
Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139165860
- –––, 1989, “Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame”, in Reason and Moral Judgment (Logos 10), William J. Prior (ed.), Santa Clara, CA: Philosophy, Santa Clara University; reprinted, in his Making Sense of Humanity: and Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, 35–45. (Scholar)
- Williamson, Timothy, 2000, Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/019925656x.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “Acting on Knowledge”, in Knowledge First: Approaches in Epistemology and Mind, J. Adam Carter, Emma C. Gordon, and Benjamin Jarvis (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 163–181 (ch. 8). (Scholar)