Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Risk" by Sven Ove Hansson

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Clausen J., et al., 2006, “Generalizing the Safety Factor Approach”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91: 964–973. (Scholar)
  • Cranor C.F., 1997, “The Normative Nature of Risk Assessment: Features and Possibilities”, Risk: Health, Safety & Environment, 8: 123–36. (Scholar)
  • Doorn, N. and S.O. Hansson, 2011, “Should safety factors replace probabilistic design?special-character:rdquo], Philosophy and Technology, 24: 151–168. (Scholar)
  • Gigerenzer, G., 2002, Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You, New York: Simon and Schuster. (Scholar)
  • Hansson, S. O., 2003, “Ethical criteria of risk acceptance”, Erkenntnis, 59: 291–309. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Weighing Risks and Benefits”, Topoi, 23: 145–152. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “Economic (ir)rationality in risk analysis”, Economics and Philosophy, 22: 231–241. (Scholar)
  • Jellinek, S. D., 1981, “On The Inevitability Of Being Wrong”, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 363: 43–47. (Scholar)
  • MacLean, D. (ed.), 1986, Values at Risk (Maryland Studies in Public Philosophy), Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
  • Machina, M.D. and M. Rothschild, 1987, “Risk”, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economic Theory and Doctrine (Volume 4), London and New York: Macmillan and Stockton, pp. 201–205. (Scholar)
  • McKerlie, D., 1986, “Rights and Risk”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16: 239–52. (Scholar)
  • Möller, N. and S.O. Hansson, 2008, “Principles of engineering safety: risk and uncertainty reduction”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93: 776–783. (Scholar)
  • Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
  • Rasmussen, Norman, et al., 1975, “Reactory Safety Study”, WASH-1400, Washington, DC: US NRC. (Scholar)
  • Rothschild, M. and J. Stiglitz, 1970, “Increasing risk: 1. A definition”, Journal of Economic Theory, 2: 225–243. (Scholar)
  • Scanlon, T.M., 1982, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,” in A. Sen and B. Williams, Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Schelling T.C., 1996, “Research By Accident”, Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 53: 15–20. (Scholar)
  • Shrader-Frechette, K., 1991, Risk and Rationality. Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
  • Sjöberg, L., 2004, “The Methodology of Risk Perception Research”, Quality and Quantity, 34: 407–418. (Scholar)
  • Thompson, P. B., 1985, “Risking or Being Willing: Hamlet and the DC-10”, Journal of Value Inquiry, 19: 301–310. (Scholar)
  • Thomson, J.J., 1985, “Imposing Risks”, in To Breathe Freely, Mary Gibson (ed.), Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 124–140. (Scholar)
  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, 1986, “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions”, Journal of Business, 59: 251–278. (Scholar)
  • Wagner, W. E., 1995, “The Science Charade In Toxic Risk Regulation”, Columbia Law Review, 95: 1613–1723. (Scholar)
  • Weinberg, A. M., 1972, “Science and Trans-Science”, Minerva, 10: 209–222. (Scholar)

Generated Wed Mar 29 05:44:45 2017