Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Risk" by Sven Ove Hansson
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Allais, M., 1953, “Le comportement de l’homme
rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de
l’école Américaine”, Econometrica,
21: 503–546. (Scholar)
- Allhoff, F., 2009, “Risk, Precaution, and Emerging Technologies”, Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 3(2), published online 25 June, 2009. doi:10.2202/1941-6008.1078 (Scholar)
- Arrow, K.J., 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing.
Yrjö Jahnsson Lectures. Helsinki: Yrjö Jahnssonin
Säätiö. (Scholar)
- Banzhaf, H.S., 2014, “Retrospectives: the Cold-War origins
of the value of statistical life”, Journal of Economic
Perspectives 28(4): 213–26. (Scholar)
- Biddle, J.B., 2016, “Inductive risk, epistemic risk, and overdiagnosis of disease”, Perspectives on Science 24(2): 192–205. (Scholar)
- Boholm, M. et al., 2016, “The Concepts of Risk, Safety, and
Security: Applications in Everyday Language.”, Risk
Analysis 36 (2): 320–338. (Scholar)
- Buchak, L., 2014, Risk and Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Caney, S., 2009, “Climate Change and the Future: Discounting for Time, Wealth, and Risk”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(2): 163–186. (Scholar)
- Cranor C., 1997, “The Normative Nature of Risk Assessment:
Features and Possibilities”, Risk: Health, Safety &
Environment, 8: 123–36. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005. “The Science Veil Over Tort Law Policy: How Should Scientific Evidence Be Utilized in Toxic Tort Law?”, Law and Philosophy, 24(2): 139–210. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, Toxic Torts: Science, Law and the Possibility of Justice (second edition), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, Tragic Failures: How and Why We Are Harmed by Toxic Chemicals, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. (Scholar)
- Doorn, N., and S.O. Hansson, 2015, “Design for the value of
safety”, in J. van den Hoven, I. van de Poel, and P. Vermaas
(eds), Handbook of Ethics, Values and Technological Design,
Dordrecht: Springer, 491–511. (Scholar)
- Dourson, M.L., & Stara, J.F., 1983, “Regulatory history
and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factors”,
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 3(3):
224–238. (Scholar)
- Ellsberg, D., 1961, “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage
Axioms”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75:
643–669. (Scholar)
- Fellner, W. 1961, “Distortion of subjective probabilities as
a reaction to uncertainty”, Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 75: 670–689. (Scholar)
- Ferretti, M.P., 2010, “Risk and Distributive Justice: The Case of Regulating New Technologies”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(3): 501–515. (Scholar)
- Fishburn, P.C., 1978, “On Handa’s ‘New theory of
cardinal utility’ and the maximization of expected
return”, Journal of Political Economy, 86:
321–324. (Scholar)
- Gigerenzer, G., 2002, Calculated Risks: How to Know When
Numbers Deceive You, New York: Simon and Schuster. (Scholar)
- Gilboa, I. and D. Schmeidler, 1994, “Additive
representations of non-additive measures and the Choquet
integral”, Annals of Operations Research, 52:
43–65. (Scholar)
- Goodwin, W., 2009, “How Does the Theologizing of Physics Contribute to Global Warming?”, Environmental Philosophy, 6(2): 21–42. (Scholar)
- Gordijn, B., 2005, “Nanoethics: From Utopian Dreams and Apocalyptic Nightmares Towards a More Balanced View”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(4): 521–533. (Scholar)
- Grüne-Yanoff, T., 2009, “Mismeasuring the Value of
Statistical Life”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 16
(2): 109–123. (Scholar)
- Handa, J., 1977, “Risk, probabilities, and a new theory of
cardinal utility”, Journal of Political Economy, 85:
97–122. (Scholar)
- Hansson, S. O., 2003, “Ethical criteria of risk acceptance”, Erkenntnis, 59: 291–309. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Weighing Risks and
Benefits”, Topoi, 23: 145–152. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “Economic (ir)rationality in risk analysis”, Economics and Philosophy, 22: 231–241. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Philosophical Problems in Cost-Benefit Analysis”, Economics and Philosophy 23: 163–183. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, The Ethics of Risk: Ethical analysis in an uncertain world, New York: Palgrave MacMillan. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “Science denial as a form of pseudoscience”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 63:39–47. (Scholar)
- Harrison, G.W. and D. Ross, 2017, “The empirical adequacy of cumulative prospect theory and its implications for normative assessment”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 24: 150–165. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J.C., 1953, “Cardinal utility in welfare economics
and in the theory of risk-taking”, Journal of Political
Economy, 61: 434–435. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J.C., 1955, “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility”, Journal of Political Economy, 63: 309–321. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J.C., 1975, “Can the maximin principle serve as a
basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’s theory”,
American Political Science Review, 69: 594–606. (Scholar)
- Heinzerling, L., 2000, “The rights of statistical
people.”, Harvard Environmental Law Review 24:
189–207. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Markets for arsenic”,
Georgetown Law Journal, 90: 2311–2339. (Scholar)
- Hempel, C.G., 1965, Aspects of scientific explanation, and other essays in the philosophy of science, New York: Free Press. (Scholar)
- Heyward, C., and D. Roser (eds.), 2016, Climate Justice in a Non-Ideal World, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Intemann, K., 2015, “Distinguishing Between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values in Climate Modeling.”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(2): 217–232. (Scholar)
- Jellinek, S. D., 1981, “On The Inevitability Of Being
Wrong”, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 363:
43–47. (Scholar)
- John, S., 2017, “From Social Values to P-Values: The Social Epistemology of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34 (2): 157–171. (Scholar)
- Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky 1979, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”, Econometrica, 47: 263–293. (Scholar)
- Kermisch, C., 2012, “Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1): 91–102. (Scholar)
- Lemons, J., et al., 1997, “The Precautionary Principle: Scientific Uncertainty and Type I and Type II Errors”, Foundations of Science, 2(2): 207–236. (Scholar)
- Lewandowsky, S., J. Cook & E. Lloyd, 2018, “The
‘Alice in Wonderland’ Mechanics of the Rejection of
(Climate) Science: Simulating Coherence by Conspiracism”,
Synthese 195 (1):175–196. (Scholar)
- MacLean, D. (ed.), 1986, Values at Risk (Maryland Studies in Public Philosophy), Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, “Cost-benefit analysis and procedural values”, Analyse & Kritik, 16(2): 166–180. (Scholar)
- Machina, M.D. and M. Rothschild, 1987, “Risk”, in J.
Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave: A
Dictionary of Economic Theory and Doctrine (Volume 4), London and
New York: Macmillan and Stockton, pp. 201–205. (Scholar)
- Macpherson, J.A.E., 2008, “Safety, Risk Acceptability, and Morality”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3): 377–390. (Scholar)
- Markowitz, H.M., 1952, “Portfolio Selection”,
Journal of Finance, 7(1): 77–91. (Scholar)
- Mayer, L. et al., 2017, “Understanding Scientists’
Computational Modeling Decisions About Climate Risk Management
Strategies Using Values-Informed Mental Models”, Global
Environmental Change 42:107–116. (Scholar)
- McKerlie, D., 1986, “Rights and Risk”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16: 239–52. (Scholar)
- McKinney, W.J., 1996, “Prediction and Rolston’s
Environmental Ethics: Lessons From the Philosophy of Science”,
Science and Engineering Ethics, 2(4): 429–440. (Scholar)
- Möller, N. and S.O. Hansson, 2008, “Principles of
engineering safety: risk and uncertainty reduction”,
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93:
776–783. (Scholar)
- Munthe, Christian, 2011, The Price of Precaution and the Ethics of Risk, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Ng, Y.-K., 2005, “Intergenerational Impartiality: Replacing
Discounting by Probability Weighting”, Journal of
Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18(3): 237–257. (Scholar)
- Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Oberdiek, J., 2014, Imposing Risk: A Normative Framework, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Pratt, J. W., 1964, “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the
Large”, Econometrica, 32: 122–136. (Scholar)
- Pressman, P., R. Clemens, W. Hayes, & C. Reddy, 2017,
“Food additive safety: A review of toxicologic and regulatory
issues”, Toxicology Research and Application
1:1–22. (Scholar)
- Pritchard, D., 2015, “Risk”, Metaphilosophy, 46(3): 436–461. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “Epistemic risk”, Journal of Philosophy 113(11): 550–571. (Scholar)
- Prothero, D., 2013, “The Holocaust Denier’s Playbook
and the Tobacco Smokescreen: Common Threads in the Thinking and
Tactics of Denialists and Pseudoscientists”, pp. 341–358
in M. Pigliucci and M. Boudry (eds), Philosophy of Pseudoscience.
Reconsidering the demarcation problem, Chicago: University of
Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Pyhälä, M., A.C. Brusendorff & H. Paulomäki,
2010, “The precautionary principle”, pp. 203–226 in
M. Fitzmaurice, D. M. Ong & P. Merkouris (eds.), Research
Handbook on International Environmental Law. Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar. (Scholar)
- Quiggin, J., 1982, “A theory of anticipated utility”,
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3:
323–343.
- Rasmussen, Norman, et al., 1975, “Reactory Safety
Study”, WASH-1400, Washington, DC: US NRC. (Scholar)
- Rawls, J., 1957, “Justice as Fairness”, Journal of Philosophy, 54: 653–662. (Scholar)
- –––, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1974, “Some Reasons for the Maximin
Criterion”, American Economic Review, 64:
141–146. (Scholar)
- Rechard, R.P., 1999, “Historical relationship between
performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal and other types
of risk assessment”, Risk Analysis, 19(5):
763–807. (Scholar)
- Rothschild, M. and J. Stiglitz, 1970, “Increasing risk: 1. A
definition”, Journal of Economic Theory, 2:
225–243. (Scholar)
- Scanlon, T.M., 1982, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,” in A. Sen and B. Williams, Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Schelling, T.C., 1968, “The Life You Save May Be Your
Own”, in Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis, S.B.
Chase, Jr. (ed.), 127–162. Washington, DC: Brookings
Institution. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, “Research By Accident”,
Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 53:
15–20. (Scholar)
- Sen, A., 2000, “The discipline of cost-benefit
analysis”, Journal of Legal Studies, 29:
931–952. (Scholar)
- Shrader-Frechette, K., 1991, Risk and Rationality. Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “Hydrogeology and Framing Questions Having Policy Consequences”, Philosophy of Science (Supplement), 64: S149–S160. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “Flawed Attacks on Contemporary Human Rights: Laudan, Sunstein, and the Cost-Benefit State”, Human Rights Review, 7(1): 92–110. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Sjöberg, L., 2004, “The Methodology of Risk Perception
Research”, Quality and Quantity, 34:
407–418. (Scholar)
- Sunstein, C.R., 2005, “Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment”, Ethics, 115: 351–385. (Scholar)
- Thompson, P. B., 1985, “Risking or Being Willing: Hamlet and the DC-10”, Journal of Value Inquiry, 19: 301–310. (Scholar)
- Thomson, J.J., 1985, “Imposing Risks”, in To
Breathe Freely, Mary Gibson (ed.), Totowa, NJ: Rowman and
Allanheld, 124–140. (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, Rights, Restitution and Risk: Essays in Moral Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Tobin, J., 1958, “Liquidity preference as behavior towards
risk”, Review of Economic Studies 25(2):
65–86. (Scholar)
- Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, 1986, “Rational Choice and the
Framing of Decisions”, Journal of Business, 59:
251–278. (Scholar)
- van den Belt, H. and B. Gremmen., 2002, “Between
Precautionary Principle and ‘Sound Science’: Distributing
the Burdens of Proof.”, Journal of Agricultural and
Environmental Ethics, 15(1): 103–122. (Scholar)
- van de Poel, I., et al., 2012, “The Problem of Many Hands:
Climate Change as an Example”, Science and Engineering
Ethics, 18(1): 49–67. (Scholar)
- Wagner, W. E., 1995, “The Science Charade In Toxic Risk
Regulation”, Columbia Law Review, 95:
1613–1723. (Scholar)
- Weinberg, A. M., 1972, “Science and Trans-Science”, Minerva, 10: 209–222. (Scholar)
- Wetmore, J.M., 2008, “Engineering with Uncertainty: Monitoring Air Bag Performance”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2): 201–218. (Scholar)