Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Robert Kilwardby" by José Filipe Silva

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Primary Sources

Robert Kilwardby's works

  • [Lewry I] Commentaries on the Isagoge, [Lewry P] Praedicamenta, [Lewry Pery] Peri Hermeneias, [Lewry LSP] Liber Sex Principiorum, and [Lewry LD] Liber divisionum, ed. P.O. Lewry, Robert Kilwardby's Writings on the Logica Vetus Studied With Regard to Their Teaching and Method, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oxford, 1978.
  • [NSLP] Notulae Super Librum Praedicamentorum, ed. Alessandro D. Conti. [NSLP online]
  • [NSLPery] Notule super librum Peryermenias, ed. Alessandro D. Conti (forthcoming).
  • [NSLPor] Notulae super librum Porphyrii, ed. Alessandro D. Conti (forthcoming).
  • [NLPA] Notulae libri Prisciani De accentibus, ed. P.O. Lewry, “Robertus Kilwardby Notulae libri Prisciani De accentibus,” Mediaeval Studies, 50 (1988): 96–185. (Scholar)
  • [DAM] In Donati artem maiorem III, ed. L. Schmücker, Brixen-Bressanone: A. Weger, 1984.
  • [DNR] De natura relationis, ed. L. Schmücker, Brixen: A. Weger, 1980 (uncritical edition in J.J. Hanagan, The contribution of Robert Kilwardby to Thirteenth Century Thought on the Doctrine of Relation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, 1973, Appendix, pp. 1–78.)
  • [NLP] Notule Libri Posteriorum, ed. D. Cannone, Le Notule Libri Posteriorum di Robert Kilwardby nella tradizione esegetica latina medievale del XIII secolo, Ph.D. Dissertation, Rome, 2003–2004.
  • [LT] In libri topycorum, ed. O. Weijers, “Le commentaire sur les Topiques attribué à Robert Kilwardby”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 6 (1995), 107–143. (Scholar)
  • [LPA] Reverendi Magistri Egidii Romani in libros Priorum analeticorum Aristotelis Expositio et interpretatio sum perquam diligenter visa recognita erroribus purgata. Et quantum anniti ars potuit fideliter impressa cum textu. Venice, 1516, reprinted Frankfurt: Minerva, 1968. New edition by P. Thom and J. Scott, Notule Libri Priorum, Oxford: Published for The British Academy by Oxford University Press, 2015 (2 vols.). (Scholar)
  • [DT] De tempore, ed. P.O. Lewry, On Time and Imagination: De tempore, De spiritu fantastico, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1987.
  • [DSF] De spiritu fantastico, ed. P.O. Lewry, On Time and Imagination: De tempore, De spiritu fantastico, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1987.
  • [DOS] De ortu scientiarum, ed. A. Judy. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1976. [A section of the text has been translated as “The Nature of Logic: Dialectic and Demonstration”, in N. Kretzmann & E. Stump (ed.), The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989] (Scholar)
  • [QLIS] Quaestiones in Librum Primum Sententiarum, ed. J. Schneider, Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1986.
  • [QLIIS] Quaestiones in Librum Secundum Sententiarum, ed. G. Leibold, Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1992.
  • [QLIII1S] Quaestiones in Librum Tertium Sententiarum, Teil 1: Christologie, ed. E. Gössmann, Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1982.
  • [QLIII2S] Quaestiones in Librum Tertium Sententiarum, Teil 2: Tugendlehre, ed. G. Leibold, Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1985.
  • [QLIVS] Quaestiones in Librum Quartum Sententiarum, ed. R. Schenk, Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1993.
  • [SCI] Sermo in capite ieiunii, ed. E.M.F. Sommer-Seckendorff in Studies in the Life of Robert Kilwardby, O.P., Rome: S. Sabinae, 1937, 163–176.
  • [SDP] Sermo in dominica in Passione, ed. P.O. Lewry, “A Passiontide Sermon of Robert Kilwardby OP,” Archivium Fratrum Praedicatorum, 52 (1982): 89–113. (Scholar)
  • [D43Q] Responsio de XLIII questionibus, ed. H.-F. Dondaine, “Le de 43 questionibus de Robert Kilwardby,” Archivium Fratrum Praedicatorum, 47 (1977): 5–50. [There is a previous partial edition of the text edited by M.-D. Chenu in “Les réponses de S. Thomas et de Kilwardby à la consultation de Jean de Verceil (1271)”, Mélanges Mandonnet. Études d'Histoire Littéraire et Doctrinale du Moyen Age, (Bibliothèque Thomiste 13), Paris: Vrin, 1930, 191–222.] (Scholar)
  • [I] The injunctions of Archbishop Kilwardby (on his Visitation of the University of Oxford in 1276), ed. H.W. Garrod, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1929.
  • [E] Epistola Roberti Kilwardby Archiepiscopi Cantuarensis ad Petrum de Confleto Archiepiscopum Corinthi, ed. F. K. Ehrle in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Englischen Scholastik, Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1970, pp. 18–54. [There is a previous partial edition of the 7th article by A. Birkenmajer in “Der Brief Robert Kilwardbys an Peter von Conflans und die Steritschrift Ägidius von Lessines,” Beitrage zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, 20:5 (1922): 36–65.]

Secondary sources

  • Alessio, G.C., 2001, “Sul De ortu scientiarum di Robert Kilwardby,” in La divisione della Filosofia e le sue Ragioni, G. d'Onofrio (ed.), Rome: Avagliano Editore. (Scholar)
  • Andrews, R., 1988, Peter of Auvergne's commentary on Aristotle's Categories. Edition, translation, and analysis, Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, “Question Commentaries on the Categories in the Thirteenth-Century,” Medioevo, 26: 265–326. (Scholar)
  • Ashworth, E.J., 1978, The Tradition of Medieval Logic and Speculative Grammar from Anselm to the End of the Seventeenth Century: A Bibliography from 1836 Onwards, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “L'analogie de l'être et les homonymes: Catégories, 1 dans le ‘Guide de l'étudiant',” in L'enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle. Autour du “Guide de l'étudiant” du ms. Ripoll 109, C. Lafleur (ed.) with collaboration of J. Carrier, Turnhout: Brepols. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991, “Signification and Modes of Signifying in Thirteenth-Century Logic: A Preface to Aquinas on Analogy,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 1: 39–67. (Scholar)
  • Bakker, P.J.J.M., 1999, La raison et le miracle. Les doctrines eucharistiques (c. 1250–c.1400), Ph.D. Dissertation, Nijmegen. (Scholar)
  • Bazán, B.C., 2002, “13th Century Commentaries on De anima: From Peter of Spain to Thomas Aquinas,” in Il commento filosofico nell'occidente latino (secoli XIII–XV), G. Fioravanti, C. Leonardi, S. Perfetti (eds.), Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 119–84. (Scholar)
  • Biffi, I., 1990, “Figure della teologia medioevale: tra Scrittura e teologia II. Roberto Kilwardby,” Teologia 15: 9–66. (Scholar)
  • Black, D.L., 1997, “Traditions and Transformations in the Medieval Approach to Rhetoric and Related Linguistic Arts,” in L'enseignement de la philosophie…, pp. 233–54. (Scholar)
  • Brady, J.M., 1964, “St. Augustine's Theory of Seminal Reasons,” The New Scholasticism, 38: 141–58. (Scholar)
  • Braakhuis, H.A.G., 1985, “Kilwardby versus Bacon? The contribution to the discussion on Univocal Signification of Beings and Non-beings Found in a Sophism Attributed to Robert Kilwardby,” in Medieval Semantics and Metaphysics. Studies dedicated to L.M. de Rijk, E.P. Bos (ed), (Artistarium Supplementa II) Nijmegen: Ingenium, pp. 112–42. (Scholar)
  • Braakhuis, H.A.G., C.H. Kneepkens, and L.M. de Rijk (eds.), 1981, English Logic and Semantics from the End of the Twelfth Century to the Time of Ockham and Burleigh, (Artistarum Supplementa 1), Niejmegen: Ingenium. (Scholar)
  • Brown, S.F., 1996, “The Reception and Use of Aristotle's Works in the Commentaries on Book I of the Sentences by the Friar Preachers in the Early Years of Oxford University,” in Aristotle in Britain During the Middle Ages, J. Marenbon (ed.), Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 351–69. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Medieval Christian Philosophy,” in The Columbia History of Western Philosophy, R.H. Popkin (ed.), New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 219–78. (Scholar)
  • Bursill-Hall, G.L., 1981, A Census of Medieval Latin Grammatical Manuscripts, (Grammatica speculativa 4), Stuttgard: Frommann-Holzboog (on Kilwardby, see nos. 24.9, 50.7.2, 90.98, 164.10, 192.5, 197.6, 197.9.1, 208.167, 208.249, 225.52.1, 288.103.3, 288.177.1, 299.41). (Scholar)
  • –––, 1971, Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages. The Doctrine of partes orationis of the Modistae, (Approaches to Semiotics 11), The Hague: Mouton. (Scholar)
  • Callus, D.-A., 1943, “Introduction of Aristotelian Learning to Oxford,” Proceedings of The British Academy, 29: 229–81. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1948, “The ‘Tabulae super Originalia Patrum’ of Robert Kilwardby O.P.,” in Studia mediaevalia in honorem admodum reverendi patris Raymundi Josephi Martin, O. P., Bruges: De Tempel, pp. 243–70. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1949, “New Manuscripts of Kilwardby's Tabulae super Originalia Patrum,” Dominican Studies, 2: 38–45. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1955, The Condemnation of St. Thomas at Oxford, Oxford: Blackfriars. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1961, “The Origins of the Problem of the Unity of Form”, The Thomist, 24: 257–85. (Scholar)
  • Cannone, D., 2002, “Le Notule Libri Posteriorum di Robert Kilwardby: il commento ad Analitici Posteriori, I, 4, 73a34–b24,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 13: 71–135. (Scholar)
  • Celano, A.J., 1986, “The ‘finis hominis’ in the thirteenth-century commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics,” Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 53: 23–53. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1986, “The Understanding of the Concept of Happiness in the pre-1250 Commentaries on the Ethica Nicomachea,” Medioevo, 12: 29–53. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991, “Robert Kilwardby and the Limits of Moral Science,” in Philosophy and the God of Abraham: Essays in Memory of James A. Weisheipl, R. J. Long (ed.), Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, pp. 31–40. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995, “The End of Practical Wisdom: Ethics as Science in the Thirteenth Century,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33: 225–43. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Robert Kilwardby on the Relation of Virtue to Happiness,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 8(2): 149–62. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Robert Kilwardby on Ethics,” in Lagerlund and Thom (eds.) 2013, pp. 315–52. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2016, Aristotle's Ethics and Medieval Philosophy. Moral Goodness and Practical Wisdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Chenu, M.-D., 1926, “Le ‘De spiritu imaginativo’ de Robert Kilwardby, O.P.,” Recherches Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques, 15: 508–17. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1925, “Robert Kilwardby,” in Dictionnaire de théologie catholique, 8(2), colls. 2354–6. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1927, “Le De conscientia de Robert Kilwardby,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 16: 318–26. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1930, “Les réponses de s. Thomas et de Kilwardby à la consultation de Jean de Verceil (1271),” in Mélanges Mandonnet, (Biblio. Thomiste XIII), Paris: Vrin, vol. I, pp. 191–222. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1957, “Spiritus. Le vocabulaire de l'âme au XIIe siècle,” Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques, 41: 209–12. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1969, La Théologie comme Science au XIIIe Siècle, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Conti, A., 2008, “Categories and Universals in the Later Middle Ages,” in Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, L.A. Newton (ed.), Leiden: Brill, pp. 369–409. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013a, “Semantics and Ontology in Robert Kilwardby's Commentaries on the Logica vetus,” in Lagerlund and Thom (eds.) 2013, pp.65–130. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013b, “Robert Kilwardby and Albert the Great on Praedicamenta and Praedicabilia,” in Fink and Ebbesen (eds.), 2013, pp. 155–69. (Scholar)
  • Corbini, A., 2001, La teoria della scienza nel XIII secolo, Florence: Sismel. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “L'oggetto della conoscenza scientifica nei commenti di Tommaso d'Aquino e di Egidio Romano agli ‘Analitici Secondi’,” Documenti e Studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 13: 231–284. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Robert Kilwardby and the Aristotelian Theory of Science,” in Lagerlund and Thom (eds.) 2013, pp. 163–208. (Scholar)
  • Cross, R., 1998, The Physics of Duns Scotus. The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Crowley, T., 1950, Roger Bacon. The Problem of the Soul in His Philosophical Commentaries, Dublin: James Duffy. (Scholar)
  • Cruz Pontes, J.M. da, 1964, “Le problème de l'origine de l'âme de la patristique à la solution thomiste,” Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale, 31: 175–229. (Scholar)
  • Dales, R.C., 1971, “The Influence of Grosseteste's ‘Hexaemeron’ on the ‘Sentences’ Commentaries of Richard Fishacre, O.P. and Richard Rufus of Cornwall, O.F.M.,” Viator, 2: 271–300. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995, The Problem of the Rational Soul in the Thirteenth Century, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Destrez, J., 1933, “Robert Kilwardby O.P., magnus magister in theologia,” Bulletin thomiste, 3: 191–3. (Scholar)
  • de Libera, A., (ed.), 1985, Robertus Kilwardby's Commentum super sophistici elenchi, in “Les Abstractiones d'Hervé le Sophiste,” Archives d'Histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen-Age, 60: 180–3 [163–230]. (Scholar)
  • –––, (ed.), 1986, “Les Summulae Dialectices de Roger Bacon. I–II, De termino. De Enuntiatione,” Archives d'Histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 53: 139–289. (Scholar)
  • de Rijk, L. M., (ed.), 2005, Giraldus Odonis O.F.M.: Opera Philosophica vol. II: de Intentionibus, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • de Vaux, R., 1933, “La première entrée d'Averroes chez les Latins,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 22: 193–245. (Scholar)
  • de Wulf, M., 1909, History of Medieval Philosophy, trans. by P. Coffey, London-New York: Longmans, Green and Co. (Scholar)
  • Donati, S., 2002, “La discussione sulla materia nella tradizione di commento della Fisica: commentatori inglesi degli anni 1240–1270 ca,” in Il commento filosofico nell'occidente latino (secoli XIII–XV), G. Fioravanti, C. Leonardi, S. Perfetti (eds.), Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 185–232. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Robert Kilwardby on Matter,” in Lagerlund and Thom (eds.) 2013, pp. 239–73. (Scholar)
  • Dondaine, A., 1936, “La question ‘De necessitate incarnationis’ de Robert Kilwardby O.P.,” Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale, 8: 97–100. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1936b, “Le ‘De tempore’ de Robert Kilwardby O.P.,” Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale, 8: 94–7. (Scholar)
  • Dondaine, H.-F., 1977, “Le ‘De 43 Questionibus’ de Robert Kilwardby,” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum, 47: 5–50. (Scholar)
  • Duhem, P., 1915, Le Système du monde. Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic. Vol. 3, pt. 2: L'astronomie latine au moyen âge, Paris: A. Hermann et Fils. (Scholar)
  • Ebbesen, S., 1980, “Is ‘Canis currit’ Ungrammatical? Grammar in Elenchi Commentaries,” in Studies in Medieval Linguistic Thought, K. Koerner, H.-J. Niederehe, R.H. Robins (eds.), Amesterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 53–67. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981, “Albert (the Great?)'s companion to the Organon,” in Albert der Grosse. Sein Zeit, sein Werk, seine Wirkung, A. Zimmermann, G. Vuillemindiem (eds.), (Miscellania Mediaevalia 14), Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 89–103. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993, “Medieval Latin Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts on the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries,” in Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions, C. Burnett (ed.), London: The Warburg Institute University of London. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “The Ars Nova in the ‘Ripoll Compendium’,” in L'enseignement de la philosophie…, C. Lafleur (ed.), pp. 325–52. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “The Prior Analytics in the Latin West: 12th–13th Centuries,” Vivarium, 48(1–2): 96–133. (Scholar)
  • Ebbesen, S. and H.A.G. Braakhuis, 1997, “Anonymi Erfordensis (= Roberti Kilwardby ?) Sophisma TANTUM UNUM EST,” Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen Âge grecque et latine, 67: 105–125. (Scholar)
  • Ebbesen, S. and R.L. Friedmann (eds.), 1999, Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition, Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters-C.A.Reitzels Forlag. (Scholar)
  • Ehrle, F.K., 1970, “L'Agostinismo e l'Aristotelismo nella scolastica del secolo XIII,” in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Englischen Scholastik, Franz Pelster (ed.), Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, pp. 87–170. (Scholar)
  • Emden, A.B., 1957–9, A Biographical Register of the University of Oxford to A.D. 1500, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Fink, J., and S. Ebbesen (eds.), 2013, Logic and Language in the Middle Ages: A Volume in Honour of Sten Ebbesen, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Fredborg, M., N.J. Green-Pedersen, L. Nielsen, and J. Pinborg (eds.), 1975, “The Commentary on ‘Priscianus Maior’ Ascribed to Robert Kilwardby. Selected Texts,” Cahiers Institut Moyen Âge grecque et latine, 15: 1–146. (Scholar)
  • Friedman, R.L., 2002, “The Sentences Commentary, 1250–1320: General Trends, the Impact of the Religious Orders, and the Test Case of Predestination,” in Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, E. Evans (ed.), Leiden: Brill, pp. 41–128. (Scholar)
  • Gàl, G., 1953, “Robert's Kilwardby Questions in the Metaphysics and Physics of Aristotle,” Franciscan Studies, 13: 7–28. (Scholar)
  • Gannon, M.A.I., 1956, “The Active Theory of Sensation in St. Augustine,” The New Scholasticism, 30: 154–80. (Scholar)
  • Gauthier, R.A., 1982, “Notes sur les débuts (1225–1240) du premier ‘Averroisme’,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 66: 322–74. (Scholar)
  • Garrod, H.W., 1929, The injunctions of Archbishop Kilwardby (on his Visitation of the University of Oxford in 1276), Oxford. (Scholar)
  • Gillon, L.-B., 1955, “Structure et genèse de la foi d'après Robert Kilwardby,” Revue Thomiste 55: 629–36. (Scholar)
  • Gilson, E., 1926–27, “Pourquoi S. Thomas a critiqué S. Augustin,” Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 1: 5–127. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1929–30, “Les sources gréco-arabes de l'augustinisme avicennisant,” Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 4: 5–149. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1947, La Philosophie au Moyen Âge, Paris: Payot. (Scholar)
  • Glorieux, P., (ed.), 1927, Les premières polémiques thomistes: Le correctorium corruptorii ‘quare’. Le Saulchoir: Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1971, La Faculté des arts et ses maîtres au XIIIe siècle, (Études de Philosophie Médiévale, 59), Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Grabmann, M., 1940, “Die ‘Sophismata logicalia et grammaticalia’ des Robert Kilwardby,” Beiträge zur Geschrichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters, 36(1): 41–5. (Scholar)
  • Gracia, J.J.E., (ed.), 1994, Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation, 1150–1650. New York: State University of New York Press. (Scholar)
  • Grant, E., 1996, Planets, Stars, and Orbs. The Medieval Cosmos, 1200–1687, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Green-Pedersen, N.J., 1985, The Tradition of the Topics in the Middle Ages. The Commentaries on Aristotle's and Boethius' ‘Topics’, München-Wien: Philosophia Verlag. (Scholar)
  • Grondeux, A. and I. Rosier-Catach, (ed.), 2007, La sophistria de Robertus Anglicus, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Hamesse, J., 1974, Les Auctoritates Aristotelis. Un florilège médiéval. Étude historique et édition critique, (Philosophes Médiévaux, 17), Louvain-Paris: Publications Universitaires-Béatrice-Nauwelaerts. (Scholar)
  • Hansen, H., 2012, John Pagus on Aristotle's Categories: A Study and Edition of the Rationes super Praedicamenta Aristotelis, Leuven: Leuven University Press. (Scholar)
  • Hinnebusch, W.A., 1951, The Early English Friars Preachers, Rome: Institutum Historicum FF. Praedicatorum ad S. Sabina. (Scholar)
  • Hissette, R., 1977, Enquête sur les 219 articles condamnés à Paris le 7 mars 1277, (Philosophes médiévaux 22), Louvain-Paris: Publications Universitaires-Vander-Oyez. (Scholar)
  • Hook, W.F., 1865, Lives of the Archbishops of Canterbury. Vol. III: Middle Age Period, London. R. Bentley. (Scholar)
  • Isaac, J., 1953, Le Peri Hermeneias en Occident de Boèce à Saint Thomas. Histoire littéraire d'un traité d'Aristote, (Bibliothèque Thomiste 29), Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Johnston, S.C., 2015, Essentialism, Nominalism, and Modality: The Modal Theories of Robert Kilwardby and John Buridan, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of St. Andrews. (Scholar)
  • Judy, A.G., 1973, Robert Kilwardby O.P.: De ortu scientiarum. A Critical Edition, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Toronto. (Scholar)
  • Kaeppeli, T., 1980, Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum Medii Aevi, Rome: Istituto Storico Dominicano, (vol. 3, pp. 320–5; vol. 4, 1993, pp. 268–9). (Scholar)
  • Karger, E., 2002, “Richard Rufus's Account of Substantial Transmutation,” Medioevo, 27: 165–189. (Scholar)
  • Kelly, L.G., 2002, The Mirror of Grammar. Theology, Philosophy and the Modistae, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
  • King, P., 1994, “Bonaventure's Theory of Individuation,” in Individuation in Scholasticism…, pp. 141–72. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Two Conceptions of Experience”, Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 11: 1–24. (Scholar)
  • Kitanov, S., 2006, Beatific Enjoyment in Scholastic Philosophy and Theology: 1240–1335, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Helsinki. (Scholar)
  • Kneale, W. and M. Kneale, 1962, The Development of Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kneepkens, C.H., 1985, “Roger Bacon on the Double intellectus: A Note on the Development of the Theory of Congruitas and Perfectio in the First Half of the Thirteenth Century,” in The rise of British Logic, P.O. Lewry (ed.), Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, pp. 115–143. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Significatio generalis and significatio specialis: Notes on Nicholas of Paris' Contribution to Early Thirteenth-Century Linguistic Thought,” in Medieval Analyses in Language…, S. Ebbesen and R.L. Friedman (eds.), pp. 17–43. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Robert Kilwardby on Grammar,” in Lagerlund and Thom (eds.) 2013, pp. 17–64. (Scholar)
  • Knudsen, C., 1982, “Intentions and Impositions,” in The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600, N. Kretzmann et al (eds.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 479–95. (Scholar)
  • Knuuttila, S., 2008, “Aristotle's Theory of Perception and Medieval Aristotelianism,” in Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, P. Kärkkäinen and S. Knuuttila (eds.), (Studies in the History of the Philosophy of Mind), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–22. (Scholar)
  • Lafleur, C., (ed.) with collaboration of J. Carrier, 1997, L'enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle. Autour du “Guide de l'étudiant” du ms. Ripoll 109, Turnhout: Brepols. (Scholar)
  • Lafleur, C. and D. Piché (with the collaboration of J. Carrier), 2007, “Porphyre et les universaux dans l'horizon de la métaphysique émanatiste du Compendium examinatore du manuscrit Ripoll 109,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 28: 271–314. (Scholar)
  • Lagerlund, H., 2000, Modal Syllogistics in the Middle Ages, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, “The Assimilation of Aristotelian and Arabic Logic Up to the Later Thirteenth Century,” in Handbook of the History of Logic: Medieval and Renaissance Logic, D.M. Gabbay and J. Woods (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier pp. 281–346. (Scholar)
  • –––, and P. Thom (eds.), 2013, A Companion to the Philosophy of Robert Kilwardby, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Leibold, G., 2010, “Robert Kilwardby's Commentary on the Sentences of Peter Lombard,” in Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, P.W. Rosemann (ed.), Leiden: Brill, pp. 175–225. (Scholar)
  • Lewry, P.O., 1975, “The Commentary on ‘Priscianus Maior’ ascribed to Robert Kilwardby: The Problem of the Authorship,” Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge grec et latin, 15: 12+–7+. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1978, Robert Kilwardby's Writings on the Logica Vetus Studied With Regard to Their Teaching and Method, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oxford. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981, “The Oxford Condemnations of 1277 in grammar and logic,” in English Logic and Semantics from the end of the Twelfth Century to the Time of Ockam and Burleigh, H.A.G. Braakhuis, C.H.Kneepkens, L.M. de Rijk (eds.), (Artistarum Supplementa 1), Nijmegen: Ingenium, pp. 235–78. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981b, “Robert Kilwardby on Meaning: A Parisian Course on the ‘Logica Vetus’,” in Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter, J.P. Beckmann et al. (eds.), (Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 13/1), Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 376–84. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981c, “Two Continuators of Aquinas: Robertus de Vulgarbia and Thomas Sutton on the Perihermeneias of Aristotle,” Mediaeval Studies, 43: 58–130. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1982, “Robertus Anglicus and the Italian Kilwardby,” in English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries, A. Maierù (ed.), (History of Logic I), Naples: Bibliopolis, pp. 33–51. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1983a, “Robert Kilwardby on Imagination: The Reconciliation of Aristotle and Augustine,” Medioevo, 9: 1–42. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1983b, “Robert Grosseteste's Question on Subsistence: An Echo of the Adamites,” Mediaeval Studies 45: 1–21. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1984, “Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric, 1220–1320,” in The History of the University of Oxford, I: The Early Oxford Schools, 1220–1320, J. Catto (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 401–33. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1986, “Robert Kilwardby's Commentary on the Ethica nova and vetus’,” in L'Homme et son Univers au Moyen Age, C. Wenin (ed.), (Philosophes médiévaux 26–7), Louvain-La-Neuve-Leuven: Peeters, vol. 2, pp. 799–807. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1988, “Thirteenth-Century Teaching on Speech and Accentuation: Robert Kilwardby's Commentary on De Accentibus of Pseudo-Priscian,” Mediaeval Studies 50: 96–185. (Scholar)
  • Lindberg, D.C., 1967, “Alhazen's Theory of Vision and Its Reception in the West,” Isis, 58(3): 321–41. (Scholar)
  • Lohr, C.H., 1973, “Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries, Authors: Robertus-Wilgelmus,” Traditio, 29: 108–13. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “The New Aristotle and ‘science’ in the Paris arts faculty (1255),” in L'enseignement des disciplines à la Faculté des arts (Paris et Oxford, XIIIe–XVe siècles), O. Weijers and L. Holtz (eds.), (Studia Artistarum, 4), Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 251–69. (Scholar)
  • Long, R.J., 1975, “Richard Fishacre and the Problem of the Soul,” The Modern Schoolman, 52: 263–70. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “Of Angels and Pinheads: The Contributions of the Early Oxford Masters to Doctrine of Spiritual Matter,” Franciscan Studies, 56: 239–54. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996, “The Reception and Use of Aristotle by the Early English Dominicans,” in Aristotle in Britain During the Middle Ages, J. Marenbon (ed.), Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 51–6. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “Interiority and Self-Knowledge According to Richard Fishacre,” in Intellect and Imagination…, M.C. Pacheco et al. (eds.), pp. 1269–1277. (Scholar)
  • Lottin, O., 1932, “La composition hylémorphique des substances spirituelles. Les débuts de la controverse,” Revue neoscholastique de philosophie, 34: 21–39. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1957, Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles. Tome I. Problèmes de Psychologie, Gemblox: J. Duculot. (Scholar)
  • Macken, R., 1980, “Le statut philosophique de la matière selon Bonaventure,” Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale, 47: 188–230. (Scholar)
  • Macrae, E., “Geoffrey of Aspall's Commentaries on Aristotle”, Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies, 6 (1968), 94–134. (Scholar)
  • Maierù, A., 1972, Terminologia logica della tarda scolastica, Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo. (Scholar)
  • –––, (ed.), 1982, English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries, (Acts of the 5th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, Rome 1980), Naples: Bibliopolis. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Robert Kilwardby on the Division of Sciences,” in Lagerlund and Thom (eds.) 2013, pp. 353–89. (Scholar)
  • Maloney, T.S., 1983, “The Semiotics of Roger Bacon,” Mediaeval Studies, 45: 120–154. (Scholar)
  • Marmo, C., 1997, “Bacon, Aristotle (and all the others) on Natural Inferential Signs,” Vivarium, 35(2): 136–154. (Scholar)
  • –––, “Types of Opposition in the PostPraedicamenta in Thirteenth-Century Commentaries,” in La tradition médiévale des catégories (XIIe–XVe siècles), J. Biard and I. Rosier-Catach (eds.), Louvain-Paris: Éditions de l'Institut Supérieur de Philosophie-Éditions Peeters, 2003, pp. 85–104. (Scholar)
  • Marrone, S.P., 1983, William of Auvergne and Robert Grosseteste. New Ideas of Truth in the Early Thirteenth-Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Martin, R.-M., 1920a, “Quelques premières maîtres dominicains de Paris et d'Oxford et la soi-disant école dominicaine augustinienne (1229–1279),” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 9: 556–80. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1920b, “La question de l'unité de la forme substantielle dans le premier collège dominicain à Oxford (1211–1248),” Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 22: 107–12. (Scholar)
  • Mazzarella, P., 1978, Controversie Medievali. Unità e pluralità delle forme, Naples: Giannini Editore. (Scholar)
  • McAleer, G.J., 1999, “The presence of Averroes in the Natural Philosophy of Robert Kilwardby,” Archiv für Geschitchte der Philosophie, 81: 33–54 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, “Was Medical Theory Heterodox in the Latin Middle Ages?”, Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévale, 68(2): 349–70. (Scholar)
  • McEvoy, J., 1982, The Philosophy of Robert Grosseteste, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Moody, E.A., 1975, “William of Auvergne and his Treatise De anima”, in Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Science, and Logic. Collected Papers 1933–1969, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–109. (Scholar)
  • Mora-Márquez, A.M., 2014, “Anonymus Oxford, Commentary on De interpretatione 1,” in Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen Áge grec et latin, 83: 135–206. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, The Thirteenth-Century Notion of Signification. The Discussion and Their Origin and Development, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Mynors, R.A.B., 1963, Catalogue of the Manuscripts in Balliol College Library, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Nardi, B., 1979, “Le dottrine d'Alberto Magno sull’inchoatio formae,” in Studi di filosofia medievale, Rome: Ed. di Storia e letteratura, pp. 69–101. (Scholar)
  • Nardi, G.M., 1938, Problemi d'embriologia umana antica e medioevale, Florence: G.C. Sansoni Editore, (Scholar)
  • O'Daly, G., 1987, Augustine's Philosophy of Mind. London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
  • Olivier, S., 2004, “Robert Grosseteste on Light, Truth and Experimentum,” Vivarium, 42(2): 151–180. (Scholar)
  • Pacheco, M.C., et al. (eds.), 2006, Intellect and Imagination in Medieval Philosophy, Turnhout: Brepols, 3 vols. (Scholar)
  • Pasnau, R., 1997, Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Pegis, A.C., 1934, St. Thomas and the Problem of the Soul in the Thirteenth Century, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. (Scholar)
  • Perler, D., (ed.), 2001, Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality, Leiden-Boston: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Piché, D., Le problème des universaux dans l'Isagoge de Porphyre selon quelques commentateurs latins du XIIIe siècle (Pseudo-Robertus Anglicus, Jean le Page, Nicolas de Paris et Robert Kilwardby). Edition critique sélective, traduction française, analyses structurelle et formelle et étude historico-philosophique, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Laval, Québec, and University of Paris, 2002.
  • Pini, G., 1999, “Species, Concepts and Things: Theories of Signification in the Second Half of the Thirteenth-Century,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 8: 21–52. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, Categories and Logic in Duns Scotus. An Interpretation of Aristotle's Categories in the Late Thirteenth Century, Leiden-Boston: Brill. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, “The Transcendentals of Logic”, in Die Logik des Transzendentalen Festschrift, J.A. Aertsen and M. Pickavé (eds.), (Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 30), Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 140–62. (Scholar)
  • Porro, P., 1996, Forme e Modelli di Durata nel Pensiero Medievale. L'aevum, il tempo discreto, la categoria ‘quando’, Leuven: Leuven University Press. (Scholar)
  • Powicke, F.M., 1931, The Medieval Books of Merton College, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Pralong, C., “La causalité de la matière. Polémiques autour d'Aristote au XIIIe et XIVe Siècle”, Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 97 (1999), 483–509. (Scholar)
  • Quétif, J. and J. Echard, 1979, Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum Recensiti, Paris: Ballard-Simart, vol. 1, pp. 374–80. (Scholar)
  • Raedts, P., 1987, Richard Rufus of Cornwall and the Tradition of Oxford Theology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (Scholar)
  • Reynolds P.L., 1999, Food and the Body. Some Peculiar Questions in High Medieval Theology, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Roensch, F., 1964, Early Thomistic School, Dubuque, Iowa: Priority Press. (Scholar)
  • Rosier, I., 1994, La parole comme acte. Sur la grammaire et la sémantique au XIIIe siècle, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Russel, J.C., 1936, Dictionary of Writers of the Thirteenth-Century England, London: Longmans-Green. (Scholar)
  • Salman, D., 1937, “Note sur la première influence d'Averroès”, Revue neoscholastique de philosophie, 40: 203–12. (Scholar)
  • Schenk, R., 1991, “Divina simulatio irae et dissimilitudo pietatis. Divinae Providence and Natural Religion in Robert Kilwardby's ‘Quaestiones in librum IV Sententiarum’,” in Mensch und Natur im Mittelalter, A. Zimmermann and A. Speer (eds.), (Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 21/1), Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 431–455. (Scholar)
  • Sharp, E., 1934, “The 1277 Condemnation of Kilwardby,” The New Scholasticism, 8: 306–18. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1935, “Further Philosophical Doctrines of Kilwardby,” The New Scholasticism, 9: 39–55. (Scholar)
  • Sharpe, R., 1997, A Handlist of the Latin Writers of Great Britain and Ireland before 1540, Brepols: Louvain-La-Neuve, pp. 560–564. (Scholar)
  • Silva, J.F., 2007, “Robert Kilwardby on Celestial Motion,” Medievalia Philosophica Polonorum, 36(2): 90–119. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, “Robert Kilwardby on Sense Perception,” in Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, S. Knuuttila and P. Kärkkäinen (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 87–99. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009, The Human Soul in Robert Kilwardby's Natural Philosophy and Theology, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Porto. (Scholar)
  • –––, (and Juhana Toivanen) 2010, “The Active Nature of the Soul in Sense Perception: Robert Kilwardby and Peter John of Olivi,” Vivarium, 48(3–4): 245–278. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, “Robert Kilwardby,” in Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy, H. Lagerlund (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1148–53. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2012, Robert Kilwardby on The Human Soul. Plurality of Forms and Censorship in the Thirteenth Century, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013a, “Hugh of St. Victor and Robert Kilwardby on Science,” in La Compilación del Saber en la Edad Media, M.J. Muñoz, P. Cañizares and C. Martin (eds.), Porto: FIDEM, pp. 515–31. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013b, “Robert Kilwardby on the Theory of the Soul and Epistemology,” in Lagerlund and Thom (eds.) 2013, pp. 275–313. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, “Medieval Theories of Active Perception: An Overview,” Active Perception in the History of Philosophy. From Plato to Modern Philosophy, J.F. Silva and M. Yrjönsuuri (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 117–46. (Scholar)
  • Sirridge, M., 1988, “Robert Kilwardby as ‘scientific grammarian’,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage, 10(1): 7–28. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1988, “’Instituitiones Grammaticae’ XVII.187: Three Reactions,” in L'Héritage des grammariens latins de l'antiquité aux lumières, I. Rosier (ed.), Paris: Editions Peeters, pp. 171–229. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1990, “Robert Kilwardby: Figurative constructions and the limits of grammar”, in De ortu grammaticae. Studies in Medieval Grammar and Linguistic Theory in Memory of Jan Pinborg, G.L. Bursill-Hall, S. Ebbesen, and K. Koerner (eds.), Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 321–37. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “‘Utrum idem sint dicere et intelligere sive videre in mente’: Robert Kilwardby, Quaestiones in librum primum Sententiarum,” Vivarium, 45(2–3): 253–68. (Scholar)
  • ––– and K.M. Fredborg, 2013, “Demonstratio ad oculum and Demonstratio ad intellectum: Pronouns in Ps.–Jordan and Robert Kilwardby,” in Fink and Ebbesen (eds.) 2013, pp. 199–20. (Scholar)
  • Sommer-Seckendorff, E.M.F., 1937, Studies in the Life of Robert Kilwardby, O.P., (Dissertationes Historicae: Fasc. VII), Rome: Institutum Historicum Fratum Praedicatorum Romae S. Sabinae. (Scholar)
  • Spruit, L., 1994, Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge. I: Classical Roots and Medieval Discussions, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Stegmüller, F., 1934, “Les questions du Commentaire des Sentences de Robert Kilwardby,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale, 6: 56–60. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1935–36, “Der Traktat des Roberts Kilwardby, O.P. De imagine et vestigio Trinitatis,” Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 10: 324–407. (Scholar)
  • Steel, C., 2009, “Albert's use of Kilwardby's Notulae in his Paraphrase of the Categories,” in Via Alberti. Texte-Quellen-Interpretationen, L. Honnefelder, H. Möhle, and S.B. del Barrio (eds.), Münster: Aschendorff, pp. 481–507. (Scholar)
  • Sweet, J., 1953, “Some thirteenth-century Sermons and their Authors,” The Journal of Ecclesiastic History, 4: 27–36. (Scholar)
  • Tachau, K., 1988, Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham. Optics, Epistemology and the Foundations of Semantics 1250–1345, Brill: Leiden. (Scholar)
  • Teske, R., 1994, “William of Auvergne on the Individuation of Human Souls,” Traditio, 49: 77–93. (Scholar)
  • Théry, G., 1921, “L'authenticité du ‘De spiritu et anima’ dans S. Thomas et Albert le Grand,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 10: 333–7.
  • Thom, P., 2004, Medieval Modal Systems. Problems and Concepts, Aldershot: Ashgate. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, Logic and Ontology in the Syllogistic of Robert Kilwardby, Leiden, Boston: Brill. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013a, “Robert Kilwardby on Syllogistic Form,” in Lagerlund and Thom (eds.) 2013, pp. 131–61. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013b, “Culuerbinus Somnians,” in Fink and Ebbesen (eds.), 2013, pp. 171–84. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2016, “Robert Kilwardby's Disputational Logic,” History and Philosophy of Logic, 37(3): 230–43. (Scholar)
  • Thomas, I., 1953, “Kilwardby on conversion,” Dominican Studies, 6: 56–76. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1954, “Maxims in Kilwardby,” Dominican Studies, 7: 129–34. (Scholar)
  • Thomson, S.H., 1938, “Robert Kilwardby's Commentaries In Priscianum and In Barbarismum Donati,” New Scholasticism, 12: 52–65. (Scholar)
  • Thörnqvist, C.T., 2013, “The “Anonymus Aurelianensis III” and Robert Kilwardby on the Prior Analytics,” in Fink and Ebbesen (eds.), 2013, pp. 185–198. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, Anonymus Aurelianensis III in Aristotelis Analytica priora, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Trifogli, C., 2013, “Robert Kilwardby on Time,” in Lagerlund and Thom (eds.) 2013, pp. 209–38. (Scholar)
  • Trivet, N., 1845, Annales sex regum Angliae, T. Hog (ed.), London: English Historical Society. (Scholar)
  • Trottmann, C., 1999, Théologie et noétique au XIIIe siècle. A la recherche d'un statut, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • van der Lecq, Ria, 2008, “Logic and Theories of Meaning in the Late 13th and Earkly 14th Century including the Modistae”, in Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic, D.M. Gabbay and J. Woods (eds.), Elsevier: North-Holland, pp. 347–88. (Scholar)
  • Veenstra, J.R., 2004, “The Subtle Knot. Robert Kilwardby and Gianfrancesco Pico on the Imagination,” in Imagination in the Later Middle Ages and Early Modern Times, L. Nauta & D. Pätzold (eds.), Leuven: Peeters, pp. 1–20. (Scholar)
  • Vittorini, M., 2009, “The Last Difference in Definition: Burley and the Tradition of the Posterior Analytics Commentaries,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 19: 329–373. (Scholar)
  • Weijers, O., (ed.) 1995a, “Le commentaire sur les ‘Topiques’ attribué à Robert Kilwardby,” Documenti e Studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 6: 107–43. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995b, La ‘disputatio’ à la Faculté des arts de Paris (1200–1350 environ), (Studia Artistarum 2), Turnhout: Brepols. (Scholar)
  • Weisheipl, J.A., 1961, “The Celestial Movers in Medieval Physics,” The Thomist, 24: 286–326. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1965, “Classification of the Sciences in Medieval Thought,” Mediaeval Studies, 27: 54–90. (Scholar)
  • Wilshire, L.E., 1964, “Where the Oxford Condemnations of 1277 directed against Aquinas?,” The New Scholasticism, 48: 125–32. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “The Condemnations of 1277 and the Intellectual Climate of the Medieval University,” in The Intellectual Climate of the Early University, N. van Deusen (ed.), Michigan: Western Michigan University, pp. 151–93. (Scholar)
  • Wippel, J.F., 1977, “The Condemnations of 1270 and 1277 at Paris,” The Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 7(2): 169–201. (Scholar)
  • Wolfson, H.A., 1935, “The Internal Senses in Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew Philosophic Texts,” Harvard Theological Review, 28(2): 69–133. (Scholar)
  • Wood, R., 2002, “Early Oxford Theology,” in Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, E. Evans (ed.), Leiden: Brill, pp. 289–343. (Scholar)
  • Zavalloni, R., 1951, Richard de Medievallia et la controverse sur la pluralité des formes, Louvain: Editions de L'Institut Supérieur de Philosophie. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Mar 26 07:48:23 2017