Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Theory and Observation in Science" by Nora Mills Boyd and James Bogen
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Anderson, E., 2004, “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce,” Hypatia, 19(1): 1–24. (Scholar)
- Aristotle(a), Generation of Animals in Complete Works
of Aristotle (Volume 1), J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 1995, pp. 774–993
- Aristotle(b), History of Animals in Complete Works of
Aristotle (Volume 1), J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 1995, pp. 1111–1228.
- Azzouni, J., 2004, “Theory, Observation, and Scientific Realism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(3): 371–92. (Scholar)
- Bacon, Francis, 1620, Novum Organum with other parts of the
Great Instauration, P. Urbach and J. Gibson (eds. and trans.), La
Salle: Open Court, 1994. (Scholar)
- Bogen, J., 2016, “Empiricism and After,”in P. Humphreys (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 779–795. (Scholar)
- Bogen, J, and Woodward, J., 1988, “Saving the Phenomena,” Philosophical Review, XCVII (3): 303–352. (Scholar)
- Bokulich, A., 2020, “Towards a Taxonomy of the Model-Ladenness of Data,” Philosophy of Science, 87(5): 793–806. (Scholar)
- Borrelli, A., 2012, “The Case of the Composite Higgs: The
Model as a ‘Rosetta Stone’ in Contemporary High-Energy
Physics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part
B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 43(3):
195–214. (Scholar)
- Boyd, N. M., 2018, “Evidence Enriched,” Philosophy of Science, 85(3): 403–21. (Scholar)
- Boyle, R., 1661, The Sceptical Chymist, Montana:
Kessinger (reprint of 1661 edition). (Scholar)
- Bridgman, P., 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Chang, H., 2005, “A Case for Old-fashioned Observability,
and a Reconstructive Empiricism,” Philosophy of
Science, 72(5): 876–887. (Scholar)
- Collins, H. M., 1985 Changing Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Conant, J.B., 1957, (ed.) “The Overthrow of the Phlogiston
Theory: The Chemical Revolution of 1775–1789,” in
J.B.Conant and L.K. Nash (eds.), Harvard Studies in Experimental
Science, Volume I, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp.
65–116).
- Daston, L., and P. Galison, 2007, Objectivity, Brooklyn: Zone Books. (Scholar)
- Douglas, H., 2000, “Inductive Risk and Values in Science,” Philosophy of Science, 67(4): 559–79. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “The Value of Cognitive Values,” Philosophy of Science, 80(5): 796–806. (Scholar)
- Duhem, P., 1906, The Aim and Structure of Physical
Theory, P. Wiener (tr.), Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1991. (Scholar)
- Earman, J., 1992, Bayes or Bust?, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Feest, U., 2005, “Operationism in psychology: what the debate is about, what the debate should be about,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(2): 131–149. (Scholar)
- Feyerabend, P.K., 1969, “Science Without Experience,” in P.K. Feyerabend, Realism, Rationalism, and Scientific Method (Philosophical Papers I), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 132–136. (Scholar)
- Franklin, A., 1986, The Neglect of Experiment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Galison, P., 1987, How Experiments End, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “Aufbau/Bauhaus: logical positivism and architectural modernism,” Critical Inquiry, 16 (4): 709–753. (Scholar)
- Goodman, A., et al., 2014, “Ten Simple Rules for the Care and
Feeding of Scientific Data,” PLoS Computational
Biology, 10(4): e1003542. (Scholar)
- Hacking, I., 1981, “Do We See Through a Microscope?,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62(4): 305–322. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Hanson, N.R., 1958, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Hempel, C.G., 1952, “Fundamentals of Concept Formation in
Empirical Science,” in Foundations of the Unity of
Science, Volume 2, O. Neurath, R. Carnap, C. Morris (eds.),
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970, pp. 651–746. (Scholar)
- Herschel, J. F. W., 1830, Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy, New York: Johnson Reprint Corp., 1966. (Scholar)
- Hooke, R., 1705, “The Method of Improving Natural
Philosophy,” in R. Waller (ed.), The Posthumous Works of
Robert Hooke, London: Frank Cass and Company, 1971. (Scholar)
- Horowitz, P., and W. Hill, 2015, The Art of Electronics,
third edition, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Intemann, K., 2021, “Feminist Perspectives on Values in
Science,” in S. Crasnow and L. Intemann (eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Feminist Philosophy of Science, New York:
Routledge, pp. 201–15. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,
1962, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, reprinted,1996. (Scholar)
- Latour, B., 1999, “Circulating Reference: Sampling the Soil
in the Amazon Forest,” in Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the
Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press, pp. 24–79. (Scholar)
- Latour, B., and Woolgar, S., 1979, Laboratory Life, The
Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1986. (Scholar)
- Laymon, R., 1988, “The Michelson-Morley Experiment and the
Appraisal of Theories,” in A. Donovan, L. Laudan, and R. Laudan
(eds.), Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific
Change, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press,
pp. 245–266. (Scholar)
- Leonelli, S., 2009, “On the Locality of Data and Claims about Phenomena,” Philosophy of Science, 76(5): 737–49. (Scholar)
- Leonelli, S., and N. Tempini (eds.), 2020, Data Journeys in the Sciences, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
- Lipton, P., 1991, Inference to the Best Explanation, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Lloyd, E.A., 1993, “Pre-theoretical Assumptions In Evolutionary Explanations of Female Sexuality,” Philosophical Studies, 69: 139–153. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “The Role of ‘Complex’
Empiricism in the Debates about Satellite Data and Climate
Models,”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part
A), 43(2): 390–401. (Scholar)
- Longino, H., 1979, “Evidence and Hypothesis: An Analysis of Evidential Relations,” Philosophy of Science, 46(1): 35–56. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, “Afterward:Data in
Transit,” in S. Leonelli and N. Tempini (eds.), Data
Journeys in the Sciences, Cham: Springer, pp. 391–400. (Scholar)
- Lupyan, G., 2015, “Cognitive Penetrability of Perception in the Age of Prediction – Predictive Systems are Penetrable Systems,” Review of Philosophical Psychology, 6(4): 547–569. doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0253-4 (Scholar)
- Mill, J. S., 1872, System of Logic, London: Longmans,
Green, Reader, and Dyer. (Scholar)
- Norton, J., 2003, “A Material Theory of Induction,” Philosophy of Science, 70(4): 647–70. (Scholar)
- –––, 2021, The Material Theory of Induction, http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/material_theory/Material_Induction_March_14_2021.pdf. (Scholar)
- Nyquist, H., 1928, “Thermal Agitation of Electric Charge in
Conductors,” Physical Review, 32(1): 110–13. (Scholar)
- O’Connor, C. and J. O. Weatherall, 2019, The Misinformation Age: How False Beliefs Spread, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Olesko, K.M. and Holmes, F.L., 1994, “Experiment,
Quantification and Discovery: Helmholtz’s Early Physiological
Researches, 1843–50,” in D. Cahan, (ed.), Hermann
Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth Century Science,
Berkeley: UC Press, pp. 50–108. (Scholar)
- Osiander, A., 1543, “To the Reader Concerning the Hypothesis
of this Work,” in N. Copernicus On the Revolutions, E.
Rosen (tr., ed.), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978, p.
XX. (Scholar)
- Parker, W. S., 2016, “Reanalysis and Observation:
What’s the Difference?,” Bulletin of the
American Meteorological Society, 97(9): 1565–72. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “Computer Simulation, Measurement, and Data Assimilation,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68(1): 273–304. (Scholar)
- Popper, K.R.,1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, K.R. Popper (tr.), New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Rheinberger, H. J., 1997, Towards a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
- Roush, S., 2005, Tracking Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Rudner, R., 1953, “The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments,” Philosophy of Science, 20(1): 1–6. (Scholar)
- Schlick, M., 1935, “Facts and Propositions,” in
Philosophy and Analysis, M. Macdonald (ed.), New York:
Philosophical Library, 1954, pp. 232–236. (Scholar)
- Schottky, W. H., 1918, “Über spontane Stromschwankungen
in verschiedenen Elektrizitätsleitern,” Annalen der
Physik, 362(23): 541–67. (Scholar)
- Shapere, D., 1982, “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy,” Philosophy of Science, 49(4): 485–525. (Scholar)
- Stanford, K., 1991, Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Stephenson, F. R., L. V. Morrison, and C. Y. Hohenkerk, 2016,
“Measurement of the Earth’s Rotation: 720 BC to AD
2015,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical,
Physical and Engineering Sciences, 472: 20160404. (Scholar)
- Stuewer, R.H., 1985, “Artificial Disintegration and the
Cambridge-Vienna Controversy,” in P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway
(eds.), Observation, Experiment, and Hypothesis in Modern Physical
Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 239–307. (Scholar)
- Suppe, F., 1977, in F. Suppe (ed.) The Structure of Scientific
Theories, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Van Fraassen, B.C, 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford:
Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Ward, Z. B., 2021, “On Value-Laden Science,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 85: 54–62. (Scholar)
- Whewell, W., 1858, Novum Organon Renovatum, Book II, in
William Whewell Theory of Scientific Method, R.E. Butts
(ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1989, pp.
103–249. (Scholar)
- Woodward, J. F., 2010, “Data, Phenomena, Signal, and Noise,” Philosophy of Science, 77(5): 792–803. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Data and Phenomena: A Restatement and Defense,” Synthese, 182(1): 165–79. (Scholar)
- Wylie, A., 2020, “Radiocarbon Dating in Archaeology: Triangulation and Traceability,” in S. Leonelli and N. Tempini (eds.), Data Journeys in the Sciences, Cham: Springer, pp. 285–301. (Scholar)
- Yap, A., 2016, “Feminist Radical Empiricism, Values, and Evidence,” Hypatia, 31(1): 58–73. (Scholar)