Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Scientific Discovery" by Jutta Schickore
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Addis, M., Sozou, P.D., Gobet, F. and Lane, P. R., 2016, “Computational scientific discovery and cognitive science theories”, in Mueller, V. C. (ed.) Computing and Philosophy, Springer, 83–87. (Scholar)
- Bartha, P., 2010, By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, W. and R. Richardson, 1993, Discovering Complexity, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Benjamin, A.C., 1934, “The Mystery of Scientific Discovery ” Philosophy of Science, 1: 224–36. (Scholar)
- Blackwell, R.J., 1969, Discovery in the Physical Sciences, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
- Boden, M.A., 2004, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Brannigan, A., 1981, The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Brem, S. and L.J. Rips, 2000, “Explanation and Evidence in Informal Argument”, Cognitive Science, 24: 573–604. (Scholar)
- Campbell, D., 1960, “Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes”, Psychological Review, 67: 380–400. (Scholar)
- Carmichael, R.D., 1922, “The Logic of Discovery”, The Monist, 32: 569–608. (Scholar)
- –––, 1930, The Logic of Discovery, Chicago: Open Court. (Scholar)
- Craver, C.F., 2002, “Interlevel Experiments, Multilevel Mechanisms in the Neuroscience of Memory”, Philosophy of Science Supplement, 69: 83–97. (Scholar)
- Craver, C.F. and L. Darden, 2013, In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Curd, M., 1980, “The Logic of Discovery: An Analysis of Three Approaches”, in T. Nickles (ed.) Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 201–19. (Scholar)
- Darden, L., 1991, Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Strategies for Discovering Mechanisms: Schema Instantiation, Modular Subassembly, Forward/Backward Chaining”, Philosophy of Science, 69: S354-S65. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Discovering Mechanisms in Molecular Biology: Finding and Fixing Incompleteness and Incorrectness”, in J. Meheus and T. Nickles (eds), Models of Discovery and Creativity, Dordrecht: Springer. 43–55. (Scholar)
- Ducasse, C.J., 1951, “Whewell’s Philosophy of Scientific Discovery II”, The Philosophical Review, 60(2): 213–34. (Scholar)
- Dunbar, K., 1997, “How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science”, in T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith, and J. Vaid (eds), Conceptual Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery , and Change, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “The Analogical Paradox: Why Analogy is so Easy in Naturalistic Settings Yet so Difficult in Psychological Laboratories”, in D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, and B.N. Kokinov (eds), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Dunbar, K, J. Fugelsang, and C Stein, 2007, “Do Naïve Theories Ever Go Away? Using Brain and Behavior to Understand Changes in Concepts”, in M. Lovett and P. Shah (eds), Thinking with Data: 33rd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, Mahwah: Erlbaum, 193–205. (Scholar)
- Feist, G.J., 1999, “The Influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity”, in R.J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity, New York: Cambridge University Press, 273–96. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Gutting, G., 1980, “Science as Discovery”, Revue internationale de philosophie, 131: 26–48. (Scholar)
- Hanson, N.R., 1958, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1960, “Is there a Logic of Scientific Discovery?”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 38: 91–106. (Scholar)
- –––, 1965, “Notes Toward a Logic of Discovery”, in R.J. Bernstein (ed.), Perspectives on Peirce. Critical Essays on Charles Sanders Peirce, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 42–65. (Scholar)
- Harman, G.H., 1965, “The Inference to the Best Explanation”, Philosophical Review, 74. (Scholar)
- Hempel, C.G., 1985, “Thoughts in the Limitations of Discovery by Computer”, in K. Schaffner (ed.), Logic of Discovery and Diagnosis in Medicine, Berkeley: University of California Press, 115–22. (Scholar)
- Hesse, M., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
- Holyoak, K.J. and P. Thagard, 1996, Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Howard, D., 2006, “Lost Wanderers in the Forest of Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Discovery-Justification Distinction”, in J. Schickore and F. Steinle (eds), Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction, Dordrecht: Springer, 3–22. (Scholar)
- Hoyningen-Huene, P., 1987, “Context of Discovery and Context of Justification”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 18: 501–15. (Scholar)
- Hull, D.L., 1988, Science as Practice: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Jantzen, B.C., 2016, “Discovery without a ‘logic’ would be a miracle”, Synthese, 193: 3209–3238. (Scholar)
- Johnson-Laird, P., 1983, Mental Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Koehler, D.J., 1991, “Explanation, Imagination, and Confidence in Judgment”, Psychological Bulletin, 110: 499–519. (Scholar)
- Kounios, J. and Beeman, M. 2009, “The Aha! Moment : The Cognitive Neuroscience of Insight”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18: 210–16. (Scholar)
- Kordig, C., 1978, “Discovery and Justification”, Philosophy of Science, 45: 110–17. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, T.S., 1970 [1962], The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; first edition, 1962. (Scholar)
- Kulkarni, D. and H.A. Simon, 1988, “The processes of scientific discovery: The strategy of experimentation”, Cognitive Science, 12: 139–76. (Scholar)
- Langley, P., 2000, “The Computational Support of Scientific Discovery”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53: 393–410. (Scholar)
- Langley, P., H.A. Simon, G.L. Bradshaw, and J.M. Zytkow, 1987, Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Laudan, L., 1980, “Why Was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned?” in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery (Volume I), Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 173–83. (Scholar)
- Leplin, J., 1987, “The Bearing of Discovery on Justification”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 17: 805–14. (Scholar)
- Lugg, A., 1985, “The Process of Discovery”, Philosophy of Science, 52: 207–20. (Scholar)
- Machamer, P., L. Darden, and C.F. Craver, 2000, “Thinking About Mechanisms”, Philosophy of Science, 67: 1–25. (Scholar)
- Magnani, L., 2000, Abduction, Reason, and Science: Processes of Discovery and Explanation, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Creative Abduction and Hypothesis Withdrawal”, in J. Meheus and T. Nickles (eds), Models of Discovery and Creativity, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Magnani, L. and N.J. Nersessian, 2002, Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, and Values, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Magnani, L., N.J. Nersessian, and P. Thagard, 1999, Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Nersessian, N.J., 1992, “How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science”, in R. Giere (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–45. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, “Model-based reasoning in conceptual change”, in L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, New York: Kluwer. 5–22. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Conceptual Change: Creativity, Cognition, and Culture ” in J. Meheus and T. Nickles (eds), Models of Discovery and Creativity, Dordrecht: Springer, 127–66. (Scholar)
- Newell, A. and H. A Simon, 1971, “Human Problem Solving: The State of the Theory in 1970”, American Psychologist, 26: 145–59. (Scholar)
- Nickles, T., 1984, “Positive Science and Discoverability”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1984: 13–27. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, “Beyond Divorce: Current Status of the Discovery Debate”, Philosophy of Science, 52: 177–206. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Truth or Consequences? Generative versus Consequential Justification in Science”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1988, 393–405. (Scholar)
- Pasquale, J.-F. de and Poirier, P. 2016, “Convolution and Modal Representations in Thagard and Stewart’s Neural Theory of Creativity: A Critical Analysis ”, Synthese, 193: 1535–1560. (Scholar)
- Popper, K., 2002 [1934/1959], The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London and New York: Routledge; original published in German in 1934; first English translation in 1959. (Scholar)
- Reichenbach, H., 1938, Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Richardson, A., 2006, “Freedom in a Scientific Society: Reading the Context of Reichenbach’s Contexts”, in J. Schickore and F. Steinle (eds), Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction, Dordrecht: Springer, 41–54. (Scholar)
- Schaffer, S., 1986, “Scientific Discoveries and the End of Natural Philosophy”, Social Studies of Science, 16: 387–420. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, “Making Up Discovery”, in M.A. Boden (ed.), Dimensions of Creativity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 13–51. (Scholar)
- Schaffner, K., 1993, Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Schickore, J. and F. Steinle, 2006, Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Schiller, F.C.S., 1917, “Scientific Discovery and Logical Proof”, in C.J. Singer (ed.), Studies in the History and Method of Science (Volume 1), Oxford: Clarendon. 235–89. (Scholar)
- Simon, H.A., 1973, “Does Scientific Discovery Have a Logic?”, Philosophy of Science, 40: 471–80. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, Models of Discovery and Other Topics in the Methods of Science, Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Simon, H.A., P.W. Langley, and G.L. Bradshaw, 1981, “Scientific Discovery as Problem Solving”, Synthese, 47: 1–28. (Scholar)
- Smith, G.E., 2002, “The Methodology of the Principia”, in G.E. Smith and I.B. Cohen (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 138–73. (Scholar)
- Snyder, L.J., 1997, “Discoverers’ Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 64: 580–604. (Scholar)
- Solomon, M., 2009, “Standpoint and Creativity”, Hypatia: 226–37. (Scholar)
- Stokes, D., 2011, “Minimally Creative Thought”, Metaphilosophy, 42: 658–81. (Scholar)
- Thagard, P., 1984, “Conceptual Combination and Scientific Discovery”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1984(1): 3–12. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, How Scientists Explain Disease, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “How Brains Make Mental Models”, in L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds), Model-Based Reasoning in Science & Technology, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 447–61. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, The Cognitive Science of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Thagard, P. and Stewart, T. C., 2011, “The AHA! Experience: Creativity Through Emergent Binding in Neural Networks”, Cognitive Science, 35: 1–33. (Scholar)
- Weber, M., 2005, Philosophy of Experimental Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Whewell, W., 1996 [1840], The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences (Volume II), London: Routledge/Thoemmes. (Scholar)
- Zahar, E., 1983, “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Invention?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 34: 243–61. (Scholar)
