Works Cited

• Anderson, Elizabeth, 2004. “Uses of Value Judgments in Science” Hypatia, 19, 1–24. (Scholar)
• –––. 2011. “Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony,” Episteme, 8(2): 144–164. (Scholar)
• Bala, Arun, 2008. The Dialogue of Civilizations in the Birth of Modern Science, New York, NY: Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Bala, Venkatesh, and Sanjeev Goyal, 1998. “Learning from Neighbors,” Review of Economic Studies, 65: 565–621. (Scholar)
• Barnes, Barry, 1977. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, and David Bloor, 1982. “Relativism, Rationalism, and the Sociology of Knowledge,” in Rationality and Relativism, Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes (eds.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 21–47. (Scholar)
• Bird, Alexander, 2010, “Social Knowing: The Social Sense of ‘Scientific Knowledge’” Philosophical Perspectives, 24: 23–56. (Scholar)
• Bronowski, Jacob, 1956. Science and Human Values, New York: Harper and Bros. (Scholar)
• Brown, James, 1989. The Rational and the Social, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994. Smoke and Mirrors: How Science Reflects Reality, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Cartwright, Nancy, 1999, The Dappled World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Will This Policy Work for You?” Philosophy of Science, 79(5): 973–989. (Scholar)
• –––, and Jeremy Hardie, 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, and Jordi Cat, Lola Fleck, and Hasok Chang, 1996. Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Collins, Harry, 1983. “An Empirical Relativist Programme in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,” in Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, London: Sage, pp. 115–140. (Scholar)
• Cranor, Carl F., 2004. “Toward Understanding Aspects of the Precautionary Principle,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29(3): 259–79. (Scholar)
• Douglas, Heather, 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science,” Philosophy of Science, 67(4): 559–579> (Scholar)
• –––, 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
• Dupré, John, 1993. The Disorder of Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Elliot, Kevin, 2011. “Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science,” Philosophy of Science, 78(2): 303–324 (Scholar)
• Fausto-Sterling, Anne, 1992. Myths of Gender, New York, NY: Basic Books. (Scholar)
• Fine, Arthur, 2007. “Relativism, Pragmatism, and the Practice of Science,” in New Pragmatists, Cheryl Misak (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 50–67. (Scholar)
• Fine, Cordelia, 2010, Delusions of Gender, New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company. (Scholar)
• Fuller, Steve, 1988. Social Epistemology, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
• Gannett, Lisa, 2003, “Making Populations: Bounding Genes in Space and Time,”Philosophy of Science, 70(5): 989–1001. (Scholar)
• Giere, Ronald, 1988. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991. “Knowledge, Values, and Technological Decisions: A Decision Theoretical Approach,” in Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, Deborah Mayo and Rachelle Hollander (eds.), pp. 183–203, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002. “Scientific Cognition as Distributed Cognition,” in Cognitive Bases of Science Peter Carruthers, Stephen Stitch, and Michael Siegal (eds.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003. “A New Program for Philosophy of Science?” Philosophy of Science, 70(1): 15–21. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006. Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, and Alan Richardson (eds.), 1996. Origins of Logical Empiricism (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XVI), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• Goldman, Alvin, 1987. “The Foundations of Social Epistemics,” Synthese, 73(1): 109–144. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995. “Psychological, Social and Epistemic Factors in the Theory of Science,” in PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Richard Burian, Mickey Forbes, and David Hull (eds.), East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 277–286. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999. “Science”, Knowledge in a Social World (Chapter 8), New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 224–271, . (Scholar)
• Gould, Stephen J., 1981. The Mismeasure of Man, New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company. (Scholar)
• Haack, Susan, 1996. “Science as Social: Yes and No,” in Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 79–94. (Scholar)
• Habib, S. Irfan and Dhruv Raina, 2001. Situating the History of Science: Dialogues with Joseph Needham, New Delhi, IN: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Haraway, Donna, 1978. “Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic (Part II),” Signs, 4(1): 37–60. (Scholar)
• –––, 1988. “Situated Knowledges,” Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575–600. (Scholar)
• Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology,” in Feminist Epistemologies, Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter (eds.), New York: Routledge, pp. 49–82. (Scholar)
• Hardwig, John, 1985. “Epistemic Dependence,” Journal of Philosophy, 82(7): 335–349. (Scholar)
• –––, 1988. “Evidence, Testimony, and the Problem of Individualism,” Social Epistemology, 2(4): 309–21. (Scholar)
• Hempel, Carl G., 1965. “Science and Human Values,” Scientific Explanation and Other Essays, New York: The Free Press, pp. 81–96. (Scholar)
• Hesse, Mary, 1980. Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
• Hull, David, 1988. Science As a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Ioannidis, John, 2005. “Why Most Published Research Findings are False,” PLOS Medicine 2(8): 696–701. (Scholar)
• Jasanoff, Sheila, 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Jeffrey, Richard C., 1956. “Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses,” Philosophy of Science, 23(3): 237–246. (Scholar)
• Jordan-Young, Rebecca, 2010. Brain Storm, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Kaplan, Jonathan, and Rasmus Winther, 2013. “Prisoners of Abstraction? The Theory and Measure of Genetic Variation, and the Very Concept of Race,” Biological Theory, 7(4): 401–12. (Scholar)
• Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. (Scholar)
• –––, 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
• Kellert, Stephen, 1993. In the Wake of Chaos, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Kellert, Stephen, Helen Longino, and C. Kenneth Waters (eds.), 2006. Scientific Pluralism (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XIX), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• Kitcher, Phillip, 1985. Vaulting Ambition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. Science in a Democratic Society, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press. (Scholar)
• Knorr-Cetina, Karin, 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge, Oxford: Pergamon Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983. “The Ethnographic Study of Scientific Work: Toward a Constructivist Interpretation of Science,” in Science Observed, Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay (eds.), London: Sage, pp. 115–177. (Scholar)
• Kourany, Janet, 2003a. “A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century,” Philosophy of Science, 70(1): 1–14. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003b, “Reply to Giere,” Philosophy of Science, 70(1): 22–26. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010. Philosophy of Science After Feminism, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Krimsky, Sheldon, 2003. Science in the Private Interest, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Kuhn, Thomas, 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Lacey, Hugh, 2005. Values and Objectivity: The Controversy over Transgenic Crops, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• ––– and Steven Woolgar, 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edition, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Laudan, Larry, 1984a. “The Pseudo-Science of Science?” in Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, James Brown (ed.), Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 41–74. (Scholar)
• Lee, Carole J., 2012. “A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review,” Philosophy of Science, 79(5): 859–870. (Scholar)
• Lee, Carole J., Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang, and Blaise Cronin, 2013, “Bias in Peer Review,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1): 2–17. (Scholar)
• Lewontin, Richard, Steven Rose, and Leon Kamin, 1984. Not in Our Genes, New York, NY: Pantheon. (Scholar)
• Loken, Eric, and Andrew Gelman, 2017. “Measurement Error and the Replication Crisis,” Science, 355(6325): 584–585. (Scholar)
• Longino, Helen E., 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002. The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Mayo, Deborah, and Rachelle Hollander (eds.), 1991. Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Mill, John Stuart, 1859. On Liberty, London: John W. Parker and Son; reprinted 1974, 1982, Gertrude Himmelfarb (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Scholar)
• Mirowski, Philip, and Esther-Mirjam Sent (eds.), 2002. Science Bought and Sold, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Mitchell, Sandra, 2002. “Integrative Pluralism,” Biology and Philosophy, 17: 55–70. (Scholar)
• Muldoon, Ryan, and Michael Weisberg, 2011. “Robustness and Idealization in Models of Cognitive Labor,” Synthese, 183: 161–174. (Scholar)
• Needham, Joseph, 1954. Science and Civilization in China, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Nersessian, Nancy J., 2006. “Model-Based Reasoning in Distributed Cognitive Systems,” Philosophy of Science, 73(5): 699–709. (Scholar)
• Nelson, Lynn Hankinson, 1990. Who Knows: From Quine to Feminist Empiricism, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
• O’Connor, Cailin, forthcoming. “The Natural Selection of Conservative Science,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science A, first online 27 September 2018. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.007 (Scholar)
• –––, and Justin Bruner, 2019. “Dynamics and Diversity in Epistemic Communities,” Erkenntnis, 84: 1: 101–119. (Scholar)
• –––, and James Weatherall, 2017. “Scientific Polarization,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8(3): 855–75. (Scholar)
• Oreskes, Naomi, and Eric Conway, 2011. Merchants of Doubt, New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press. (Scholar)
• Parker, Wendy, 2006. “Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling,” Foundations of Science, 11(4): 349–368. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010. “Predicting Weather and Climate,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B), 41(3): 263–272. (Scholar)
• Peirce, Charles S., 1868. “Some Consequences of Four Incapacities,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2: 140–157; reprinted in C.S. Peirce, Selected Writings, Philip Wiener (ed.), New York: Dover Publications, 1958, pp. 39–72. (Scholar)
• –––, 1878. “How to Make Our Ideas Clear,” Popular Science Monthly, 12: 286–302; reprinted in C.S. Peirce, Selected Writings, Philip Wiener (ed.), New York: Dover Publications, 1958, pp. 114–136. (Scholar)
• Pickering, Andrew, 1984. Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
• Popper, Karl, 1950. The Open Society and its Enemies, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1963. Conjectures and Refutations, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• –––, 1972. Objective Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Potter, Elizabeth, 2001. Gender and Boyle’s Law of Gases, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
• Raina, Rajeswari (ed.), 2015. Science, Technology, and Development in India: Encountering Values, New Delhi: Orient Black Swan. (Scholar)
• Redish, A. David, Erich Kummerfeld, Rebecca Lea Morris, and Alan C. Love, 2018. “Opinion: Why Reproducibility Failures Are Essential to Scientific Inquiry,” PNAS, 115(20): 5042–46. (Scholar)
• Rose, Hilary, 1983. “Hand, Brain, and Heart,” Signs, 9(1): 73–96. (Scholar)
• Rosenstock, Sarita, Justin Bruner, and Cailin O’Connor, 2017. “In Epistemic Networks, Is Less Really More?” Philosophy of Science, 84: 324–52. (Scholar)
• Roth, Paul, 2003. “Kitcher’s Two Cultures,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 33(3): 386–405. (Scholar)
• Rouse, Joseph, 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• Rubin, Hannah, and Cailin O’Connor, 2018. “Discrimination and Collaboration in Science,” Philosophy of Science, 85: 380–402. (Scholar)
• Rudner, Richard, 1953. “The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments,” Philosophy of Science, 20(1): 1–6. (Scholar)
• Schmitt, Frederick, 1988. “On the Road to Social Epistemic Interdependence,” Social Epistemology, 2: 297–307. (Scholar)
• Shapin, Steven, 1982. “The History of Science and Its Sociological Reconstruction,” History of Science, 20: 157–211. (Scholar)
• –––, and Simon Schaffer, 1985. Leviathan and the Air Pump, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Shrader-Frechette, Kristin, 1994. “Expert Judgment and Nuclear Risks: The Case for More Populist Policy,” Journal of Social Philosophy, 25: 45–70. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002. Environmental Justice: Creating Equality; Reclaiming Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Sober, Elliott, and David Sloan Wilson, 1998. Unto Others, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Scholar)
• Solomon. Miriam, 1992. “Scientific Rationality and Human Reasoning,” Philosophy of Science, 59(3): 439–54. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994a. “Social Empiricism,” Noûs, 28(3): 323–343. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994b. “A More Social Epistemology,” in Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge, Frederick Schmitt (ed.), Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, pp. 217–233. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001. Social Empiricism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006. “Groupthink versus The Wisdom of Crowds: The Social Epistemology of Deliberation and Dissent,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, XLIV: 28–42. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. “Group Judgment and the Medical Consensus Conference,” Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Medicine, Fred Gifford (ed.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 239–254. (Scholar)
• Spencer, Quayshawn, 2012. “What Biological Racial Realism Should Mean” Philosophical Studies, 159: 181–204. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014. “Biological Theory and the Metaphysics of Race; A Reply to Kaplan and Winther,” Biological Theory, 8: 114–120. (Scholar)
• Steele, Daniel and Kyle Whyte, 2012. “Environmental Justice, Values, and Scientific Expertise” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 22(2): 163–182. (Scholar)
• Strevens, Michael, 2003. “The Role of the Priority Rule in Science,” Journal of Philosophy, 100: 55–79. (Scholar)
• Tatsioni, Athina, with Nikolaos Bonitsis, and John Ioannidis, 2007. “The Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(21): 2517–26. (Scholar)
• Thagard, Paul, 2012. The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Traweek, Sharon, 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Uebel, Thomas, 2004. “Political Philosophy of Science in Logical Empiricism: The Left Vienna Circle,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36: 754–773. (Scholar)
• van Fraassen, Bas, 2008. Scientific Representation, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Welbourne, Michael, 1981. “The Community of Knowledge,” Philosophical Quarterly, 31(125): 302–314. (Scholar)
• Wilholt, Torsten, 2013. “Epistemic Trust in Science,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24(2): 233–253. (Scholar)
• Winsberg, Eric, 2012. “Values and Uncertainties in the Predictions of global Climate Models,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 22(2): 111–137. (Scholar)
• –––, Bryce Huebner, and Rebecca Kukla, 2014. “Accountability and Values in Radically Collaborative Research,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 46: 16–23. (Scholar)
• Winther, Rasmus Grønfeldt, forthcoming. When Maps Become the World, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Wylie, Alison, 2002. Thinking from Things, Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Young, N.S., with John Ioannidis, O. Al-Ubaydli, 2008. “Why Current Publication Practices May Harm Science,” Public Library of Science Medicine, 5(10): e201, doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201 (Scholar)
• Zollman, Kevin, 2007. “The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 574–87. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010. “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity,” Erkenntnis, 72(1): 17035. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013. “Network Epistemology: Communication in Epistemic Communities,” Philosophy Compass, 8(1): 15–27 (Scholar)

Further Reading

• Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison, 2010. Objectivity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Elliott, Kevin, 2017. A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Fleck, Ludwig, 1973. The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Hacking, Ian, 1999. The Social Construction of What?, Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Latour, Bruno, 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Levi, Isaac, 1980. The Enterprise of Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Radder, Hans (ed.), 2010. The Commodification of Scientific Research, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
• McMullin, Ernan (ed.), 1992. Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge, South Bend: Notre Dame University Press. (Scholar)
• Sismondo, Sergio, 1996. Science Without Myth, Albany: State University of New York Press. (Scholar)