Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Scientific Method" by Brian Hepburn and Hanne Andersen

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Aikenhead, G.S., 1987, “High-school graduates’ beliefs about science-technology-society. III. Characteristics and limitations of scientific knowledge”, Science Education, 71(4): 459–487. (Scholar)
Allchin, D., H.M. Andersen and K. Nielsen, 2014, “Complementary Approaches to Teaching Nature of Science: Integrating Student Inquiry, Historical Cases, and Contemporary Cases in Classroom Practice”, Science Education, 98: 461–486. (Scholar)
Anderson, C., 2008, “The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete”, Wired magazine, 16(7): 16–07 (Scholar)
Arabatzis, T., 2006, “On the inextricability of the context of discovery and the context of justification”, in Revisiting Discovery and Justification, J. Schickore and F. Steinle (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 215–230. (Scholar)
Barnes, J. (ed.), 1984, The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vols I and II, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Barnes, B. and D. Bloor, 1982, “Relativism, Rationalism, and the Sociology of Knowledge”, in Rationality and Relativism, M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds.), Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 1–20. (Scholar)
Bauer, H.H., 1992, Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method, Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
Bechtel, W. and R.C. Richardson, 1993, Discovering complexity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Berkeley, G., 1734, The Analyst in De Motu and The Analyst: A Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary, D. Jesseph (trans. and ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. (Scholar)
Blachowicz, J., 2009, “How science textbooks treat scientific method: A philosopher’s perspective”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(2): 303–344. (Scholar)
Bloor, D., 1991, Knowledge and Social Imagery, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2^nd edition. (Scholar)
Boyle, R., 1682, New experiments physico-mechanical, touching the air, Printed by Miles Flesher for Richard Davis, bookseller in Oxford. (Scholar)
Bridgman, P.W., 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
–––, 1956, “The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts”, in The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Science and Psychology, Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven (eds.), Minnesota: University of Minneapolis Press, pp. 38–76. (Scholar)
Burian, R., 1997, “Exploratory Experimentation and the Role of Histochemical Techniques in the Work of Jean Brachet, 1938–1952”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 19(1): 27–45. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “On microRNA and the need for exploratory experimentation in post-genomic molecular biology”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 29(3): 285–311. (Scholar)
Carnap, R., 1928, Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin: Bernary, transl. by R.A. George, The Logical Structure of the World, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967. (Scholar)
–––, 1956, “The methodological character of theoretical concepts”, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, 1: 38–76. (Scholar)
Carrol, S., and D. Goodstein, 2009, “Defining the scientific method”, Nature Methods, 6: 237. (Scholar)
Churchman, C.W., 1948, “Science, Pragmatics, Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 15(3): 249–268. (Scholar)
Cooper, J. (ed.), 1997, Plato: Complete Works, Indianapolis: Hackett. (Scholar)
Darden, L., 1991, Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
Dewey, J., 1910, How we think, New York: Dover Publications (reprinted 1997). (Scholar)
Douglas, H., 2009, Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
Dupré, J., 2004, “Miracle of Monism ”, in Naturalism in Question, Mario De Caro and David Macarthur (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 36–58. (Scholar)
Elliott, K.C., 2007, “Varieties of exploratory experimentation in nanotoxicology”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 29(3): 311–334. (Scholar)
Elliott, K. C., and T. Richards (eds.), 2017, Exploring inductive risk: Case studies of values in science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Falcon, Andrea, 2005, Aristotle and the science of nature: Unity without uniformity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Feyerabend, P., 1978, Science in a Free Society, London: New Left Books (Scholar)
–––, 1988, Against Method, London: Verso, 2^nd edition. (Scholar)
Fisher, R.A., 1955, “Statistical Methods and Scientific Induction”, Journal of The Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 17(1): 69–78. (Scholar)
Foster, K. and P.W. Huber, 1999, Judging Science. Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Fox Keller, E., 2003, “Models, Simulation, and ‘computer experiments’”, in The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, H. Radder (ed.), Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 198–215. (Scholar)
Gilbert, G., 1976, “The transformation of research findings into scientific knowledge”, Social Studies of Science, 6: 281–306. (Scholar)
Gimbel, S., 2011, Exploring the Scientific Method, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Goodman, N., 1965, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. (Scholar)
Haack, S., 1995, “Science is neither sacred nor a confidence trick”, Foundations of Science, 1(3): 323–335. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, Defending science—within reason, Amherst: Prometheus. (Scholar)
–––, 2005a, “Disentangling Daubert: an epistemological study in theory and practice”, Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law, 5, Haack 2005a available online. doi:10.5840/jpsl2005513 (Scholar)
–––, 2005b, “Trial and error: The Supreme Court’s philosophy of science”, American Journal of Public Health, 95: S66-S73. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Federal Philosophy of Science: A Deconstruction-and a Reconstruction”, NYUJL & Liberty, 5: 394. (Scholar)
Hangel, N. and J. Schickore, 2017, “Scientists’ conceptions of good research practice”, Perspectives on Science, 25(6): 766–791 (Scholar)
Harper, W.L., 2011, Isaac Newton’s Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Hempel, C., 1950, “Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 41(11): 41–63. (Scholar)
–––, 1951, “The Concept of Cognitive Significance: A Reconsideration”, Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 80(1): 61–77. (Scholar)
–––, 1965, Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science, New York–London: Free Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1966, Philosophy of Natural Science, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
Holmes, F.L., 1987, “Scientific writing and scientific discovery”, Isis, 78(2): 220–235. (Scholar)
Howard, D., 2003, “Two left turns make a right: On the curious political career of North American philosophy of science at midcentury”, in Logical Empiricism in North America, G.L. Hardcastle & A.W. Richardson (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 25–93. (Scholar)
Hoyningen-Huene, P., 2008, “Systematicity: The nature of science”, Philosophia, 36(2): 167–180. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, Systematicity. The Nature of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Howie, D., 2002, Interpreting probability: Controversies and developments in the early twentieth century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Hughes, R., 1999, “The Ising Model, Computer Simulation, and Universal Physics”, in Models as Mediators, M. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–145 (Scholar)
Hume, D., 1739, A Treatise of Human Nature, D. Fate Norton and M.J. Norton (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. (Scholar)
Humphreys, P., 1995, “Computational science and scientific method”, Minds and Machines, 5(1): 499–512. (Scholar)
ICMJE, 2013, “Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals”, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, available online, accessed August 13 2014 (Scholar)
Jeffrey, R.C., 1956, “Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses”, Philosophy of Science, 23(3): 237–246. (Scholar)
Kaufmann, W.J., and L.L. Smarr, 1993, Supercomputing and the Transformation of Science, New York: Scientific American Library. (Scholar)
Knorr-Cetina, K., 1981, The Manufacture of Knowledge, Oxford: Pergamon Press. (Scholar)
Krohs, U., 2012, “Convenience experimentation”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and BiomedicalSciences, 43: 52–57. (Scholar)
Kuhn, T.S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Scholar)
Latour, B. and S. Woolgar, 1986, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2^nd edition. (Scholar)
Laudan, L., 1968, “Theories of scientific method from Plato to Mach”, History of Science, 7(1): 1–63. (Scholar)
Lenhard, J., 2006, “Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and Neyman-Pearson”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(1): 69–91. (Scholar)
Leonelli, S., 2012, “Making Sense of Data-Driven Research in the Biological and the Biomedical Sciences”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(1): 1–3. (Scholar)
Levi, I., 1960, “Must the scientist make value judgments?”, Philosophy of Science, 57(11): 345–357 (Scholar)
Lindley, D., 1991, Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Lipton, P., 2004, Inference to the Best Explanation, London: Routledge, 2^nd edition. (Scholar)
Marks, H.M., 2000, The progress of experiment: science and therapeutic reform in the United States, 1900–1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Mazzochi, F., 2015, “Could Big Data be the end of theory in science?”, EMBO reports, 16: 1250–1255. (Scholar)
Mayo, D.G., 1996, Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
McComas, W.F., 1996, “Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science”, School Science and Mathematics, 96(1): 10–16. (Scholar)
Medawar, P.B., 1963/1996, “Is the scientific paper a fraud”, in The Strange Case of the Spotted Mouse and Other Classic Essays on Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–39. (Scholar)
Mill, J.S., 1963, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson (ed.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Scholar)
NAS, 1992, Responsible Science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process, Washington DC: National Academy Press. (Scholar)
Nersessian, N.J., 1987, “A cognitive-historical approach to meaning in scientific theories”, in The process of science, N. Nersessian (ed.), Berlin: Springer, pp. 161–177.
–––, 2008, Creating Scientific Concepts, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Newton, I., 1726, Philosophiae naturalis Principia Mathematica (3^rd edition), in The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy: A New Translation, I.B. Cohen and A. Whitman (trans.), Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. (Scholar)
–––, 1704, Opticks or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colors of Light, New York: Dover Publications, 1952. (Scholar)
Neyman, J., 1956, “Note on an Article by Sir Ronald Fisher”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 18: 288–294. (Scholar)
Nickles, T., 1987, “Methodology, heuristics, and rationality”, in Rational changes in science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning, J.C. Pitt (ed.), Berlin: Springer, pp. 103–132. (Scholar)
Nicod, J., 1924, Le problème logique de l’induction, Paris: Alcan. (Engl. transl. “The Logical Problem of Induction”, in Foundations of Geometry and Induction, London: Routledge, 2000.) (Scholar)
Nola, R. and H. Sankey, 2000a, “A selective survey of theories of scientific method”, in Nola and Sankey 2000b: 1–65.
–––, 2000b, After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend. Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method, London: Springer. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, Theories of Scientific Method, Stocksfield: Acumen. (Scholar)
Norton, S., and F. Suppe, 2001, “Why atmospheric modeling is good science”, in Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, C. Miller and P. Edwards (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 88–133. (Scholar)
O’Malley, M., 2007, “Exploratory experimentation and scientific practice: Metagenomics and the proteorhodopsin case”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 29(3): 337–360. (Scholar)
O’Malley, M., C. Haufe, K. Elliot, and R. Burian, 2009, “Philosophies of Funding”, Cell, 138: 611–615. (Scholar)
Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz, 1994, “Verification, Validation and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences”, Science, 263(5147): 641–646. (Scholar)
Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins, 2003, “Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications”, International Journal of Science Education, 25(9): 1049–1079. (Scholar)
Parascandola, M., 1998, “Epidemiology—2^nd-Rate Science”, Public Health Reports, 113(4): 312–320. (Scholar)
Parker, W., 2008a, “Franklin, Holmes and the Epistemology of Computer Simulation”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22(2): 165–83. (Scholar)
–––, 2008b, “Computer Simulation through an Error-Statistical Lens”, Synthese, 163(3): 371–84. (Scholar)
Pearson, K. 1892, The Grammar of Science, London: J.M. Dents and Sons, 1951 (Scholar)
Pearson, E.S., 1955, “Statistical Concepts in Their Relation to Reality”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 17: 204–207. (Scholar)
Pickering, A., 1984, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
Popper, K.R., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Routledge, 2002 (Scholar)
–––, 1963, Conjectures and Refutations, London: Routledge, 2002. (Scholar)
–––, 1985, Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography, La Salle: Open Court Publishing Co.. (Scholar)
Rudner, R., 1953, “The Scientist Qua Scientist Making Value Judgments”, Philosophy of Science, 20(1): 1–6. (Scholar)
Rudolph, J.L., 2005, “Epistemology for the masses: The origin of ‘The Scientific Method’ in American Schools”, History of Education Quarterly, 45(3): 341–376 (Scholar)
Schickore, J., 2008, “Doing science, writing science”, Philosophy of Science, 75: 323–343. (Scholar)
Schickore, J. and N. Hangel, 2019, “‘It might be this, it should be that…’ uncertainty and doubt in day-to-day science practice”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(2): 31. doi:10.1007/s13194-019-0253-9 (Scholar)
Shamoo, A.E. and D.B. Resnik, 2009, Responsible Conduct of Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Shank, J.B., 2008, The Newton Wars and the Beginning of the French Enlightenment, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Shapin, S. and S. Schaffer, 1985, Leviathan and the air-pump, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Smith, G.E., 2002, “The Methodology of the Principia”, in The Cambridge Companion to Newton, I.B. Cohen and G.E. Smith (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 138–173. (Scholar)
Snyder, L.J., 1997a, “Discoverers’ Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 64: 580–604. (Scholar)
–––, 1997b, “The Mill-Whewell Debate: Much Ado About Induction”, Perspectives on Science, 5: 159–198. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, “Renovating the Novum Organum: Bacon, Whewell and Induction”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30: 531–557. (Scholar)
Sober, E., 2008, Evidence and Evolution. The logic behind the science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
Sprenger, J. and S. Hartmann, 2019, Bayesian philosophy of science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Steinle, F., 1997, “Entering New Fields: Exploratory Uses of Experimentation”, Philosophy of Science (Proceedings), 64: S65–S74. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, “Experiments in History and Philosophy of Science”, Perspectives on Science, 10(4): 408–432. (Scholar)
Strasser, B.J., 2012, “Data-driven sciences: From wonder cabinets to electronic databases”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(1): 85–87. (Scholar)
Succi, S. and P.V. Coveney, 2018, “Big data: the end of the scientific method?”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 377: 20180145. doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0145 (Scholar)
Suppe, F., 1998, “The Structure of a Scientific Paper”, Philosophy of Science, 65(3): 381–405. (Scholar)
Swijtink, Z.G., 1987, “The objectification of observation: Measurement and statistical methods in the nineteenth century”, in The probabilistic revolution. Ideas in History, Vol. 1, L. Kruger (ed.), Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 261–285. (Scholar)
Waters, C.K., 2007, “The nature and context of exploratory experimentation: An introduction to three case studies of exploratory research”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 29(3): 275–284. (Scholar)
Weinberg, S., 1995, “The methods of science… and those by which we live”, Academic Questions, 8(2): 7–13. (Scholar)
Weissert, T., 1997, The Genesis of Simulation in Dynamics: Pursuing the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam Problem, New York: Springer Verlag. (Scholar)
William H., 1628, Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus, in On the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals, R. Willis (trans.), Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1993. (Scholar)
Winsberg, E., 2010, Science in the Age of Computer Simulation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Wivagg, D. & D. Allchin, 2002, “The Dogma of the Scientific Method”, The American Biology Teacher, 64(9): 645–646 (Scholar)

Generated Mon Dec 2 22:57:04 2024

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...