Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Scientific Objectivity" by Julian Reiss and Jan Sprenger

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Anderson, Elizabeth, 2004, “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce”, Hypatia, 19(1): 1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x (Scholar)
Atkinson, Anthony B., 2001, “The Strange Disappearance of Welfare Economics”, Kyklos, 54(2‐3): 193–206. doi:10.1111/1467-6435.00148 (Scholar)
Axtell, Guy, 2016, Objectivity, Cambridge: Polity Press. (Scholar)
Bakker, Marjan, Annette van Dijk, and Jelte M. Wicherts, 2012, “The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6): 543–554. doi:10.1177/1745691612459060 (Scholar)
Bernardo, J.M., 2012, “Integrated Objective Bayesian Estimation and Hypothesis Testing”, in Bayesian Statistics 9: Proceedings of the Ninth Valencia Meeting, J.M. Bernardo et al. (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–68. (Scholar)
Betz, Gregor, 2013, “In Defence of the Value Free Ideal”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(2): 207–220. doi:10.1007/s13194-012-0062-x (Scholar)
Biddle, Justin B., 2013, “State of the Field: Transient Underdetermination and Values in Science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(1): 124–133. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.09.003 (Scholar)
Biddle, Justin B. and Rebecca Kukla, 2017, “The Geography of Epistemic Risk”, in Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science, Kevin C. Elliott and Ted Richards (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, 215–238. (Scholar)
Bloor, David, 1982, “Durkheim and Mauss Revisited: Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 13(4): 267–297. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(82)90012-7 (Scholar)
Braithwaite, R. B., 1953, Scientific Explanation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Carnap, Rudolf, 1950 [1962], Logical Foundations of Probability, second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Cartwright, Nancy, 2007, “Are RCTs the Gold Standard?”, BioSocieties, 2(1): 11–20. doi:10.1017/s1745855207005029 (Scholar)
Chang, Hasok, 2004, Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195171276.001.0001 (Scholar)
Churchman, C. West, 1948, Theory of Experimental Inference, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
Collins, H. M., 1985, Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, “A Strong Confirmation of the Experimenters’ Regress”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 25(3): 493–503. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(94)90063-9 (Scholar)
Cranor, Carl F., 1993, Regulating Toxic Substances: A Philosophy of Science and the Law, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Crasnow, Sharon, 2013, “Feminist Philosophy of Science: Values and Objectivity: Feminist Philosophy of Science”, Philosophy Compass, 8(4): 413–423. doi:10.1111/phc3.12023 (Scholar)
Daston, Lorraine, 1992, “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective”, Social Studies of Science, 22(4): 597–618. doi:10.1177/030631292022004002 (Scholar)
Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison, 1992, “The Image of Objectivity”, Representations, 40(special issue: Seeing Science): 81–128. doi:10.2307/2928741 (Scholar)
–––, 2007, Objectivity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Dilthey, Wilhelm, 1910 [1981], Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Scholar)
Dorato, Mauro, 2004, “Epistemic and Nonepistemic Values in Science”, in Machamer and Wolters 2004: 52–77. (Scholar)
Douglas, Heather E., 2000, “Inductive Risk and Values in Science”, Philosophy of Science, 67(4): 559–579. doi:10.1086/392855 (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity”, Synthese, 138(3): 453–473. doi:10.1023/b:synt.0000016451.18182.91 (Scholar)
–––, 2009, Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Facts, Values, and Objectivity”, Jarvie and Zamora Bonilla 2011: 513–529. (Scholar)
Duhem, Pierre Maurice Marie, 1906 [1954], La théorie physique. Son objet et sa structure, Paris: Chevalier et Riviere; translated by Philip P. Wiener, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954. (Scholar)
Dupré, John, 2007, “Fact and Value”, in Kincaid, Dupré, and Wylie 2007: 24–71. (Scholar)
Earman, John, 1992, Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory, Cambridge/MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
Elliott, Kevin C., 2011, “Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science”, Philosophy of Science, 78(2): 303–324. doi:10.1086/659222 (Scholar)
Feyerabend, Paul K., 1962, “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism”, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (ed.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 3), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 28–97. (Scholar)
–––, 1975, Against Method, London: Verso. (Scholar)
–––, 1978, Science in a Free Society, London: New Left Books. (Scholar)
Fine, Arthur, 1998, “The Viewpoint of No-One in Particular”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 72(2): 7. doi:10.2307/3130879 (Scholar)
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer, 1935, The Design of Experiments, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. (Scholar)
–––, 1956, Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, New York: Hafner. (Scholar)
Franklin, Allan, 1994, “How to Avoid the Experimenters’ Regress”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 25(3): 463–491. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(94)90062-0 (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “Calibration”, Perspectives on Science, 5(1): 31–80. (Scholar)
Freese, Jeremy and David Peterson, 2018, “The Emergence of Statistical Objectivity: Changing Ideas of Epistemic Vice and Virtue in Science”, Sociological Theory, 36(3): 289–313. doi:10.1177/0735275118794987 (Scholar)
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 1960 [1989], Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen : Mohr. Translated as Truth and Method, 2^nd edition, Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall (trans), New York, NY: Crossroad, 1989. (Scholar)
Gelman, Andrew and Christian Hennig, 2017, “Beyond Subjective and Objective in Statistics”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 180(4): 967–1033. doi:10.1111/rssa.12276 (Scholar)
Giere, Ronald N., 2006, Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Good, Irving John, 1950, Probability and the Weighing of Evidence, London: Charles Griffin. (Scholar)
Gul, Faruk and Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2008, “The Case for Mindless Economics”, in The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: a Handbook, Andrew Caplin and Andrew Schotter (eds), New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–39. (Scholar)
Guyatt, Gordon, John Cairns, David Churchill, Deborah Cook, Brian Haynes, Jack Hirsh, Jan Irvine, Mark Levine, Mitchell Levine, Jim Nishikawa, et al., 1992, “Evidence-Based Medicine: A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine”, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 268(17): 2420–2425. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032 (Scholar)
Haack, Susan, 2003, Defending Science—Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Scholar)
Hacking, Ian, 1965, Logic of Statistical Inference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781316534960 (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “Let’s Not Talk About Objectivity”, in Padovani, Richardson, and Tsou 2015: 19–33. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1_2">10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1_2 (Scholar)
Hanson, Norwood Russell, 1958, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Haraway, Donna, 1988, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”, Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066 (Scholar)
Harding, Sandra, 1991, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is Strong Objectivity?”, in Feminist Epistemologies, Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter (ed.), New York, NY: Routledge, 49–82. (Scholar)
–––, 2015a, Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2015b, “After Mr. Nowhere: What Kind of Proper Self for a Scientist?”, Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 1(1): 1–22. doi:10.5206/fpq/2015.1.2 (Scholar)
Hausman, Daniel M., 2012, Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare, New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139058537 (Scholar)
Hempel, Carl G., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: The Free Press. (Scholar)
Hesse, Mary B., 1980, Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press. (Scholar)
Howson, Colin, 2000, Hume’s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Howson, Colin and Peter Urbach, 1993, Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, second edition, La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer, 1977, The Langurs of Abu: Female and Male Strategies of Reproduction, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Ioannidis, John P. A., 2005, “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False”, PLoS Medicine, 2(8): e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 (Scholar)
Janack, Marianne, 2002, “Dilemmas of Objectivity”, Social Epistemology, 16(3): 267–281. doi:10.1080/0269172022000025624 (Scholar)
Jarvie, Ian C. and Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (eds.), 2011, The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, London: SAGE. (Scholar)
Jaynes, Edwin T., 1968, “Prior Probabilities”, IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(3): 227–241. doi:10.1109/tssc.1968.300117 (Scholar)
Jeffrey, Richard C., 1956, “Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses”, Philosophy of Science, 23(3): 237–246. doi:10.1086/287489 (Scholar)
Jeffreys, Harold, 1939 [1980], Theory of Probability, third edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Kelvin, Lord (William Thomson), 1883, “Electrical Units of Measurement”, Lecture to the Institution of Civil Engineers on 3 May 1883, reprinted in 1889, Popular Lectures and Addresses, Vol. I, London: MacMillan and Co., p. 73. (Scholar)
Kincaid, Harold, John Dupré, and Alison Wylie (eds.), 2007, Value-Free Science?: Ideals and Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308969.001.0001 (Scholar)
Kitcher, Philip, 2011a, Science in a Democratic Society, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Scholar)
–––, 2011b, The Ethical Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Koskinen, Inkeri, forthcoming, “Defending a Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, first online: 3 August 2018. doi:10.1093/bjps/axy053 (Scholar)
Kourany, Janet A., 2010, Philosophy of Science after Feminism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Kuhn, Thomas S., 1962 [1970], The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1977, “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice”, in his The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 320–39. (Scholar)
Lacey, Hugh, 1999, Is Science Value-Free? Values and Scientific Understanding, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, “The Ways in Which the Sciences Are and Are Not Value Free”, in In the Scope of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Volume Two of the 11th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Cracow, August 1999, Peter Gärdenfors, Jan Woleński, and Katarzyna Kijania-Placek (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 519–532. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0475-5_9 (Scholar)
Laudan, Larry, 1984, Science and Values: An Essay on the Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Scholar)
Levi, Isaac, 1960, “Must the Scientist Make Value Judgments?”, The Journal of Philosophy, 57(11): 345–357. doi:10.2307/2023504 (Scholar)
Lloyd, Elisabeth A., 1993, “Pre-Theoretical Assumptions in Evolutionary Explanations of Female Sexuality”, Philosophical Studies, 69(2–3): 139–153. doi:10.1007/bf00990080 (Scholar)
–––, 2005, The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Longino, Helen E., 1990, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy”, in Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 39–58. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_3 (Scholar)
Machamer, Peter and Gereon Wolters (eds.), 2004, Science, Values and Objectivity, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. (Scholar)
Mayo, Deborah G., 1996, Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge, Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
McMullin, Ernan, 1982, “Values in Science”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982, 3–28. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “The Virtues of a Good Theory”, in The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, Martin Curd and Stathis Psillos (eds), London: Routledge. (Scholar)
Megill, Allan, 1994, “Introduction: Four Senses of Objectivity”, in Rethinking Objectivity, Allan Megill (ed.), Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1–20. (Scholar)
Mill, John Stuart, 1859 [2003], On Liberty, New Haven and London: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
Mitchell, Sandra D., 2004, “The Prescribed and Proscribed Values in Science Policy”, in Machamer and Wolters 2004: 245–255. (Scholar)
Nagel, Thomas, 1986, The View From Nowhere, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Nixon, Richard, 1969, “Special Message to the Congress on Social Security”, 25 September 1969. [Nixon 1969 available online] (Scholar)
Norton, John D., 2003, “A Material Theory of Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 70(4): 647–670. doi:10.1086/378858 (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “Must Evidence Underdetermine Theory?”, in The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice, Martin Carrier, Don Howard and Janet Kourany (eds), Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press: 17–44. (Scholar)
Oakeshott, Michael, 1933, Experience and Its Modes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Okruhlik, Kathleen, 1994, “Gender and the Biological Sciences”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume, 20: 21–42. doi:10.1080/00455091.1994.10717393 (Scholar)
Open Science Collaboration, 2015, “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science”, Science, 349(6251): aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716 (Scholar)
Padovani, Flavia, Alan Richardson, and Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.), 2015, Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives from Science and Technology Studies, (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 310), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1 (Scholar)
Page, Scott E., 2007, The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Paternotte, Cédric, 2011, “Rational Choice Theory”, in The SAGE Handbook of The Philosophy of Social Sciences, Jarvie and Zamora Bonilla 2011: 307–321. (Scholar)
Popper, Karl. R., 1934 [2002], Logik der Forschung, Vienna: Julius Springer. Translated as Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 1963, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, New York: Harper. (Scholar)
–––, 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Porter, Theodore M., 1995, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Putnam, Hilary, 2002, The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Putnam, Hilary and Vivian Walsh, 2007, “A Response to Dasgupta”, Economics and Philosophy, 23(3): 359–364. doi:10.1017/s026626710700154x (Scholar)
Reichenbach, Hans, 1938, “On Probability and Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 5(1): 21–45. doi:10.1086/286483 (Scholar)
Reiss, Julian, 2008, Error in Economics: The Methodology of Evidence-Based Economics, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “In Favour of a Millian Proposal to Reform Biomedical Research”, Synthese, 177(3): 427–447. doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9790-7 (Scholar)
–––, 2013, Philosophy of Economics: A Contemporary Introduction, New York, NY: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “What Are the Drivers of Induction? Towards a Material Theory+”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 83: 8–16. (Scholar)
Resnik, David B., 2007, The Price of Truth: How Money Affects the Norms of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Rickert, Heinrich, 1929, Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung. Eine logische Einleitung in die historischen Wissenschaften, 6th edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. First edition published in 1902. (Scholar)
Royall, Richard, 1997, Scientific Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm, London: Chapman & Hall. (Scholar)
Rudner, Richard, 1953, “The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments”, Philosophy of Science, 20(1): 1–6. doi:10.1086/287231 (Scholar)
Ruphy, Stéphanie, 2006, “‘Empiricism All the Way down’: A Defense of the Value-Neutrality of Science in Response to Helen Longino’s Contextual Empiricism”, Perspectives on Science, 14(2): 189–214. doi:10.1162/posc.2006.14.2.189 (Scholar)
Sen, Amartya, 1993, “Internal Consistency of Choice”, Econometrica, 61(3): 495–521. (Scholar)
Shrader-Frechette, K. S., 1991, Risk and Rationality, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Scholar)
Simonsohn, Uri, Leif D. Nelson, and Joseph P. Simmons, 2014, “P-Curve: A Key to the File-Drawer.”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2): 534–547. doi:10.1037/a0033242 (Scholar)
Sprenger, Jan, 2016, “Bayesianism vs. Frequentism in Statistical Inference”, in Oxford Handbook on Philosophy of Probability, Alan Hájek and Christopher Hitchcock (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “The Objectivity of Subjective Bayesianism”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8(3): 539–558. doi:10.1007/s13194-018-0200-1 (Scholar)
Sprenger, Jan and Stephan Hartmann, 2019, Bayesian Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199672110.001.0001 (Scholar)
Steel, Daniel, 2010, “Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk”, Philosophy of Science, 77(1): 14–34. doi:10.1086/650206 (Scholar)
Steele, Katie, 2012, “The Scientist qua Policy Advisor Makes Value Judgments”, Philosophy of Science, 79(5): 893–904. doi:10.1086/667842 (Scholar)
Stegenga, Jacob, 2011, “Is Meta-Analysis the Platinum Standard of Evidence?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 42(4): 497–507. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.07.003 (Scholar)
–––, 2018, Medical Nihilism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198747048.001.0001 (Scholar)
Teira, David, 2010, “Frequentist versus Bayesian Clinical Trials”, in Philosophy of Medicine, Fred Gifford (ed.), (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 16), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 255–297. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51787-6.50010-6 (Scholar)
Teira, David and Julian Reiss, 2013, “Causality, Impartiality and Evidence-Based Policy”, in Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics, Hsiang-Ke Chao, Szu-Ting Chen, and Roberta L. Millstein (eds.), (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences 3), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 207–224. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2454-9_11 (Scholar)
Weber, Max, 1904 [1949], “Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis”, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 19(1): 22–87. Translated as “‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy”, in Weber 1949: 50–112. (Scholar)
–––, 1917 [1949], “Der Sinn der ‘Wertfreiheit’ der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften”. Reprinted in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: UTB, 1988, 451–502. Translated as “The Meaning of ‘Ethical Neutrality’ in Sociology and Economics” in Weber 1949: 1–49. (Scholar)
–––, 1949, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch (trans/eds), New York, NY: Free Press. (Scholar)
Wilholt, Torsten, 2009, “Bias and Values in Scientific Research”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 40(1): 92–101. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.12.005 (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Epistemic Trust in Science”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64(2): 233–253. doi:10.1093/bjps/axs007 (Scholar)
Williams, Bernard, 1985 [2011], Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reprinted London and New York, NY: Routledge, 2011. (Scholar)
Williamson, Jon, 2010, In Defence of Objective Bayesianism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228003.001.0001 (Scholar)
Windelband, Wilhelm, 1915, Präludien. Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, fifth edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (Scholar)
Winsberg, Eric, 2012, “Values and Uncertainties in the Predictions of Global Climate Models”, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 22(2): 111–137. doi:10.1353/ken.2012.0008 (Scholar)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1953 [2001], Philosophical Investigations, G. Anscombe (trans.), London: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Worrall, John, 2002, “What Evidence in Evidence‐Based Medicine?”, Philosophy of Science, 69(S3): S316–S330. doi:10.1086/341855 (Scholar)
Wylie, Alison, 2003, “Why Standpoint Matters”, in Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology, Robert Figueroa and Sandra Harding (eds), New York, NY and London: Routledge, pp. 26–48. (Scholar)
Ziliak, Stephen Thomas and Deirdre N. McCloskey, 2008, The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice and Lives, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Dec 9 21:32:48 2024

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...