Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Scientific Pluralism" by David Ludwig and Stéphanie Ruphy

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Abel, Günter, 1993, Interpretationswelten Gegenwartsphilosophie Jenseits von Essentialismus und Relativismus, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. (Scholar)
Adorno, Theodor W., Ralf Dahrendorf, Harald Pilot, Hans Albert, Jürgen Habermas, and Karl R. Popper, 1972, Der Positivismusstreit in der Deutschen Soziologie, Darmstadt: Luchterhand-Literaturverlag. (Scholar)
Ahn, Soohyun, 2020, “How Non-Epistemic Values Can Be Epistemically Beneficial in Scientific Classification”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 84: 57–65. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.08.002 (Scholar)
Albert, Hans, 1970, “Theorie, Verstehen und Geschichte: Zur Kritik des methodologischen Autonomieanspruchs in den sogenannten Geisteswissenschaften”, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 1(1): 3–23. doi:10.1007/bf01801439 (Scholar)
Anderson, Elizabeth, 2004, “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce”, Hypatia, 19(1): 1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x (Scholar)
Ankeny, Rachel, Hasok Chang, Marcel Boumans, and Mieke Boon, 2011, “Introduction: Philosophy of Science in Practice”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(3): 303–307. doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0036-4 (Scholar)
Arabatzis, Theodore and Jutta Schickore (eds.), 2012, Ways of Integrating History and Philosophy of Science, special issue of Perspectives in Science, 20(4). (Scholar)
Bachelard, Gaston, 1934, Le Nouvel Esprit Scientifique, Paris: Presses universitaires de France. (Scholar)
–––, 1949, Le rationalisme appliqué, Paris: Presses universitaires de France. (Scholar)
–––, 1986, The New Scientific Spirit, New York: Beacon Press. (Scholar)
Bailer-Jones, Daniela M, 2000, “Modelling Extended Extragalactic Radio Sources”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 31(1): 49–74. doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(99)00028-3 (Scholar)
Barberousse, Anouk, Françoise Longy, Francesca Merlin, and Stéphanie Ruphy, 2020, “Natural Kinds: A New Synthesis”, THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 35(3): 365–387. doi:10.1387/theoria.21066 (Scholar)
Beatty, John, 1987, “Natural Selection and the Null Hypothesis”, in The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, John Dupré (ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 53–76. (Scholar)
Bedessem, Baptiste and Stéphanie Ruphy, 2020, “Citizen Science and Scientific Objectivity: Mapping Out Epistemic Risks and Benefits”, Perspectives on Science, 28(5): 630–654. doi:10.1162/posc_a_00353 (Scholar)
Biddle, Justin, 2007, “Lessons from the Vioxx Debacle: What the Privatization of Science Can Teach Us About Social Epistemology”, Social Epistemology, 21(1): 21–39. doi:10.1080/02691720601125472 (Scholar)
Biddle, Justin B. and Anna Leuschner, 2015, “Climate Skepticism and the Manufacture of Doubt: Can Dissent in Science Be Epistemically Detrimental?”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(3): 261–278. doi:10.1007/s13194-014-0101-x (Scholar)
Blatti, Stephan and Sandra Lapointe (eds.), 2016, Ontology after Carnap, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661985.001.0001 (Scholar)
Van Bouwel, Jeroen, 2009, “The Problem With(out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism”, in The Social Sciences and Democracy, Jeroen Van Bouwel (ed.), London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 121–142. doi:10.1057/9780230246867_7 (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Pluralists about Pluralism? Different Versions of Explanatory Pluralism in Psychiatry”, in New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, Maria Carla Galavotti, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel, and Marcel Weber (eds.), (The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective 5), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 105–119. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04382-1_8 (Scholar)
Van Bouwel, Jeroen, Erik Weber, and Leen De Vreese, 2011, “Indispensability Arguments in Favour of Reductive Explanations”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 42(1): 33–46. doi:10.1007/s10838-011-9141-5 (Scholar)
Boyd, Richard, 2021, “Rethinking Natural Kinds, Reference and Truth: Towards More Correspondence with Reality, Not Less”, Synthese, 198(S12): 2863–2903. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02138-4 (Scholar)
Braillard, Pierre-Alain and Christophe Malaterre, 2015, Explanation in Biology: An Enquiry into the Diversity of Explanatory Patterns in the Life Sciences, (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences 11), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9822-8 (Scholar)
Brigandt, Ingo, forthcoming, “How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds without Talking about ‘Natural Kinds’”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, first online: 22 July 2020. doi:10.1017/can.2020.29 (Scholar)
Bueter [Büter], Anke, 2019, “A Multi-Dimensional Pluralist Response to the DSM-Controversies”, Perspectives on Science, 27(2): 316–343. doi:10.1162/posc_a_00309 (Scholar)
Bush, Vannevar, 1945 [1995], Science, the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President, United States Government Printing Office. Reprinted North Stratford: Ayer Company Publishers, 1995. [Bush 1945 available online] (Scholar)
Canguilhem, Georges, 1965, “Philosophie et science”, video, Alain Badiou (interviewer), L’enseignement de la philosophie, Paris: Radio-Télévision Scolaire (RTS), January 1965. Transcribed in Cahiers philosophiques, Hors série, juin 1993, p. 22. [Canguilhem 1965a video available online] (Scholar)
–––, 1977, Idéologie et rationalité dans l’histoire des sciences de la vie: nouvelles études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
–––, 1990, Ideology and Rationality in the History of the Life Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Scholar)
Carnap, Rudolf, 1931/1934 [1995], The Unity of Science, Max Black (trans.), London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1934. Revised and translated version of “Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft”, Erkenntnis, 2(1): 432–465 (1931). Reprinted Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1995. doi:10.1007/BF02028172 (de) (Scholar)
–––, 1950, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”, Revue internationale de philosophie, 4(11): 20–40. (Scholar)
Cartwright, Nancy, 1999, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167093 (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “Well‐Ordered Science: Evidence for Use”, Philosophy of Science, 73(5): 981–990. doi:10.1086/518803 (Scholar)
Cartwright, Nancy, Jordi Cat, Lola Fleck, and Thomas E. Uebel, 1996, Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598241 (Scholar)
Cassirer, Ernst, 1929, Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen: Dritter Teil: Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. (Scholar)
–––, 2020, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, volume 3, New York: Routledge (Scholar)
Cat, Jordi, 2012, “Essay Review: Scientific Pluralism, Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino, and C. Kenneth Waters (eds.)”, Philosophy of Science, 79(2): 317–325. doi:10.1086/664747 (Scholar)
Chakravartty, Anjan, 2017, Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190651459.001.0001 (Scholar)
–––, forthcoming, “Last Chance Saloons for Natural Kind Realism”, American Philosophical Quaterly. [Chakravartty, Anjan forthcoming available online] (Scholar)
Chang, Hasok, 2012, Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 293), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3932-1 (Scholar)
Chemla, Karine and Evelyn Fox Keller (eds.), 2017, Cultures without Culturalism: The Making of Scientific Knowledge, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Scholar)
Clarke, Steve and Adrian Walsh, 2013, “Imperialism, Progress, Developmental Teleology, and Interdisciplinary Unification”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27(3): 341–351. doi:10.1080/02698595.2013.825493 (Scholar)
Comte, Auguste, 1830 [1998], Cours de philosophie positive I, Paris: Bachelier. Reprinted Paris: Hermann, 1998. (Scholar)
Conix, Stijn, 2019, “In Defence of Taxonomic Governance”, Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 19(2): 87–97. doi:10.1007/s13127-019-00391-6 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Enzyme Classification and the Entanglement of Values and Epistemic Standards”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 84: 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.05.005 (Scholar)
Cooper, Rachel, 2020, “The Concept of Disorder Revisited: Robustly Value-Laden Despite Change”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 94: 141–161. doi:10.1093/arisup/akaa010 (Scholar)
Crasnow, Sharon, 2013, “Feminist Philosophy of Science: Values and Objectivity”, Philosophy Compass, 8(4): 413–423. doi:10.1111/phc3.12023 (Scholar)
Crombie, A. C., 1994, Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
Dale, Rick, Eric Dietrich, and Anthony Chemero, 2009, “Explanatory Pluralism in Cognitive Science”, Cognitive Science, 33(5): 739–742. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01042.x (Scholar)
Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison, 2007, Objectivity, New York: Zone Books. (Scholar)
Dellsén, Finnur and Maria Baghramian, forthcoming, “Disagreement in Science: Introduction to the Special Issue”, Synthese, first online: 10 July 2020. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02767-0 (Scholar)
Dewey, John, 1938/1955 [1988], “Unity of Science as a Social Problem”, in Neurath, Morris, and Carnap (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science Chicago: Chicago University Press, reprinted 1955, Volume I, Nos. 1–5: 29–38. Reprinted in his The Later Works of John Dewey, Volume 13: 1938–1939, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988, 271–280. (Scholar)
Diemer, Alwin, 1971, Der Methoden- und Theorienpluralismus in den Wissenschaften, Meisenheim Am Glan: A. Hain. (Scholar)
Doezema, Tess, David Ludwig, Phil Macnaghten, Clare Shelley-Egan, and Ellen-Marie Forsberg, 2019, Translation, Transduction, and Transformation: Expanding Practices of Responsibility across Borders, special issue of Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(3). (Scholar)
Douglas, Heather, 2004, “The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity”, Synthese, 138(3): 453–473. doi:10.1023/b:synt.0000016451.18182.91 (Scholar)
–––, 2009, Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
Dupré, John, 1981, “Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa”, The Philosophical Review, 90(1): 66–90. doi:10.2307/2184373 (Scholar)
–––, 1993, The Disorder of Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, “Are Whales Fish?”, in Folkbiology, Douglas L. Medin and Scott Atran (eds.), Cambridge: MIT Press, 461–476. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, “The Lure of the Simplistic”, Philosophy of Science, 69(S3): S284–S293. doi:10.1086/341852 (Scholar)
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina, 2020, “Carnapian Explication and Ameliorative Analysis: A Systematic Comparison”, Synthese, 197(3): 1011–1034. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1732-9 (Scholar)
Earman, John, 1992, Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Edwards, Paul N., 2010, A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Efstathiou, Sophia, 2016, “Is It Possible to Give Scientific Solutions to Grand Challenges? On the Idea of Grand Challenges for Life Science Research”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 56: 48–61. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.10.009 (Scholar)
Eigi, Jaana, 2017, “Different Motivations, Similar Proposals: Objectivity in Scientific Community and Democratic Science Policy”, Synthese, 194(12): 4657–4669. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1077-1 (Scholar)
Elliott, Kevin C., 2017, A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001 (Scholar)
Ereshefsky, Marc, 2000, The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498459 (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Natural Kinds, Mind Independence, and Defeasibility”, Philosophy of Science, 85(5): 845–856. doi:10.1086/699676 (Scholar)
Feest, Uljana and Thomas Sturm, 2011, “What (Good) Is Historical Epistemology? Editors’ Introduction”, Erkenntnis, 75(3): 285–302. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9345-4 (Scholar)
Fernández Pinto, Manuel, 2015, “Commercialization and the Limits of Well-Ordered Science”, Perspectives on Science, 23(2): 173–191. doi:10.1162/posc_a_00166 (Scholar)
Feyerabend, Paul, 1965, “Problems of Empiricism”, in Beyond the Edge of Certainty: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, Robert G. Colodny (ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 145–260. (Scholar)
–––, 1975, Against Method, New York: New Left Books. (Scholar)
–––, 1978, Science in a Free Society, New York: Schocken Books. (Scholar)
Flach, W., 1994, “Die Bedeutung des Neukantianismus für die Wissenschaftstheorie”, in Neukantianismus: Perspektiven und Probleme, Ernst Wolfgang Orth and Helmut Holzhey (eds.), Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann: 174–184. (Scholar)
Fleck, Ludwik, 1935, Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, Basel: Verlagsbuchhandlung. (Scholar)
–––, 1979, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Fodor, J. A., 1974, “Special Sciences (or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis)”, Synthese, 28(2): 97–115. doi:10.1007/bf00485230 (Scholar)
Foucault, Michel, 1966, Les Mots et les choses : une archéologie des sciences humaines, Paris: Éditions Gallimard. (Scholar)
–––, 1970, The Order of Things, New York: Pantheon Books. (Scholar)
Franklin-Hall, L. R., 2015, “Natural Kinds as Categorical Bottlenecks”, Philosophical Studies, 172(4): 925–948. doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0326-8 (Scholar)
Freire, Paulo, 1968 [1970], Pedagogia do Oprimido, Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra. Translated as Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Myra Bergman Ramos (trans.), New York: Herder, 1970. (Scholar)
Galison, Peter, 1997, Image and Logic: a Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Galison, Peter and David J. Stump (eds.), 1996, The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
Gardner, Howard, 1987, The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
Garnett, Stephen T. and Les Christidis, 2017, “Taxonomy Anarchy Hampers Conservation”, Nature, 546(7656): 25–27. doi:10.1038/546025a (Scholar)
Gibbs, Paul, 2015, “Transdisciplinarity as Epistemology, Ontology or Principles of Practical Judgement”, in Transdisciplinary Professional Learning and Practice, Paul Gibbs (ed.), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 151–164. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11590-0_11 (Scholar)
Giere, Ronald N., 2006, Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Gijsbers, Victor, 2016, “Explanatory Pluralism and the (Dis)Unity of Science: The Argument from Incompatible Counterfactual Consequences”, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7: 11 March 2016. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00032 (Scholar)
Gorman, Michael E. (ed.), 2010, Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Grantham, Todd A., 1999, “Explanatory Pluralism in Paleobiology”, Philosophy of Science, 66: S223–S236. doi:10.1086/392727 (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “Conceptualizing the (Dis)Unity of Science”, Philosophy of Science, 71(2): 133–155. doi:10.1086/383008 (Scholar)
Grasswick, Heidi E. and Mark Owen Webb, 2002, “Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology”, Social Epistemology, 16(3): 185–196. doi:10.1080/0269172022000025570 (Scholar)
Griffiths, Paul and Karola Stotz, 2013, Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511744082 (Scholar)
Grüne-Yanoff, Till, 2016, “Interdisciplinary Success without Integration”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(3): 343–360. doi:10.1007/s13194-016-0139-z (Scholar)
Habermas, Jürgen, 1968, Erkenntnis und Interesse, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Scholar)
–––, 1970, Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Scholar)
–––, 1972, Knowledge and Human Interests, Boston: Beacon Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1990, On the Logic of the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Polity. (Scholar)
Hacking, Ian, 1982, “Language, Truth and Reason”, in Rationality and Relativism, Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, 48–66. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, “A Tradition of Natural Kinds”, Philosophical Studies, 61(1–2): 109–126. doi:10.1007/bf00385836 (Scholar)
–––, 1992a, “Statistical Language, Statistical Truth and Statistical Reason: The Self-Authentification of a Style of Scientific Reasoning”, in The Social Dimensions of Science, Ernan McMullin (ed.), Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 130–157. (Scholar)
–––, 1992b, “Disunified Science”, in The End of Science, Richard Q. Elvee (ed.), Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 33–52. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “The Disunities of The Sciences”, in Galison and Stump 1996: 37–74. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, The Social Construction of What?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “Natural Kinds: Rosy Dawn, Scholastic Twilight”, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 61: 203–239. doi:10.1017/s1358246100009802 (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “‘Language, Truth and Reason’ 30 Years Later”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 43(4): 599–609. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.07.002 (Scholar)
Hagendijk, Rob and Alan Irwin, 2006, “Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe”, Minerva, 44(2): 167–184. doi:10.1007/s11024-006-0012-x (Scholar)
Haraway, Donna, 1988, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”, Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066 (Scholar)
Harding, Sandra G., 1988, Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is ‘Strong Objectivity?’”, The Centennial Review, 36(3): 437–470. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Hauswald, Rico, 2017, “Pluralismus Und Zielkonflikte in Der Wissenschaft”, Zeitschrift Für Philosophische Forschung, 71(2): 249–267. doi:10.3196/004433017821280494 (Scholar)
Healy, Hali, 2019, “A Political Ecology of Transdisciplinary Research”, Journal of Political Ecology, 26(1): 500–528. doi:10.2458/v26i1.23245 (Scholar)
Hellman, Geoffrey Paul and Frank Wilson Thompson, 1975, “Physicalism: Ontology, Determination, and Reduction”, The Journal of Philosophy, 72(17): 551–564. doi:10.2307/2025067 (Scholar)
Hicks, Daniel, 2011, “Is Longino’s Conception of Objectivity Feminist?”, Hypatia, 26(2): 333–351. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01160.x (Scholar)
Holbrook, J. Britt, 2013, “What Is Interdisciplinary Communication? Reflections on the Very Idea of Disciplinary Integration”, Synthese, 190(11): 1865–1879. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7 (Scholar)
Intemann, Kristen, 2010, “25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now?”, Hypatia, 25(4): 778–796. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01138.x (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Diversity and Dissent in Science: Does Democracy Always Serve Feminist Aims?”, in Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, Heidi E. Grasswick (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 111–132. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_6 (Scholar)
James, William, 1909, A Pluralistic Universe, New York: Longmans, Green & Co. (Scholar)
Janich, Peter, F., Friedrich Kambartel, and Jürgen Mittelstrass, 1974, Wissenschaftstheorie als Wissenschaftskritik, Frankfurt am Main: Aspekte. (Scholar)
Jantsch, Erich, 1972, “Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation”, in Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 97–121. [Jantsch 1972 available online (as part of the whole)] (Scholar)
Jardine, Nicholas, 2000, The Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198250395.001.0001 (Scholar)
Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.), 2004, States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203413845 (Scholar)
Jasanoff, Sheila and Sang-Hyun Kim, 2009, “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea”, Minerva, 47(2): 119–146. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4 (Scholar)
Jasanoff, Sheila and Hilton R. Simmet, 2017, “No Funeral Bells: Public Reason in a ‘Post-Truth’ Age”, Social Studies of Science, 47(5): 751–770. doi:10.1177/0306312717731936 (Scholar)
Kearnes, Matthew, 2009, “The Time of Science: Deliberation and the ‘New Governance’ of Nanotechnology”, in Governing Future Technologies, Mario Kaiser, Monika Kurath, Sabine Maasen, and Christoph Rehmann-Sutter (eds.), (Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 27), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 279–301. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2834-1_15 (Scholar)
Keller, Evelyn Fox, 2017, “Climate Science, Truth, and Democracy”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 64: 106–122. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.06.006 (Scholar)
Kellert, Stephen H., Helen E. Longino, and C. Kenneth Waters (eds.), 2006a, Scientific Pluralism, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2006b, “Introduction: The Pluralist Stance”, in Kellert, Longino, and Waters 2006a: vii–xxix. (Scholar)
Kendig, Catherine (ed.), 2015, Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315619934 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Ontology and Values Anchor Indigenous and Grey Nomenclatures: A Case Study in Lichen Naming Practices among the Samí, Sherpa, Scots, and Okanagan”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 84: 101340. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2020.101340 (Scholar)
Kendler, Kenneth S., 2005, “Toward a Philosophical Structure for Psychiatry”, American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(3): 433–440. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.433 (Scholar)
Khalidi, Muhammad Ali, 2018, “Natural Kinds as Nodes in Causal Networks”, Synthese, 195(4): 1379–1396. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0841-y (Scholar)
Kincaid, Harold and Jacqueline A. Sullivan (eds.), 2014, Classifying Psychopathology: Mental Kinds and Natural Kinds, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Kitcher, Philip, 1984a, “Species”, Philosophy of Science, 51(2): 308–333. doi:10.1086/289182 (Scholar)
–––, 1984b, “1953 and All That. A Tale of Two Sciences”, The Philosophical Review, 93(3): 335–373. doi:10.2307/2184541 (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “The Division of Cognitive Labor”, Journal of Philosophy, 87(1): 5–22. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, Science, Truth, and Democracy, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195145836.001.0001 (Scholar)
–––, 2002, “The Third Way: Reflections on Helen Longino’s The Fate of Knowledge”, Philosophy of Science, 69(4): 549–559. doi:10.1086/344617 (Scholar)
–––, 2011, Science in a Democratic Society, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Scholar)
Klimovsky, Gregorio, 1975, Ciencia e ideología: aportes polémicos, Buenos Aires: Ediciones Ciencia Nueva. (Scholar)
Knorr-Cetina, Karin, 1999, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Koskinen, Inkeri, 2020, “Defending a Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(4): 1187–1207. doi:10.1093/bjps/axy053 (Scholar)
Koskinen, Inkeri and Uskali Mäki, 2016, “Extra-Academic Transdisciplinarity and Scientific Pluralism: What Might They Learn from One Another?”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(3): 419–444. doi:10.1007/s13194-016-0141-5 (Scholar)
Koskinen, Inkeri and Kristina Rolin, 2019, “Scientific/Intellectual Movements Remedying Epistemic Injustice: The Case of Indigenous Studies”, Philosophy of Science, 86(5): 1052–1063. doi:10.1086/705522 (Scholar)
Kourany, Janet A., 2010, Philosophy of Science after Feminism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732623.001.0001 (Scholar)
Kuhn, Thomas S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Kusch, Martin, 2020a, Relativism in the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108979504 (Scholar)
–––, 2020b, “Welche Funktionen haben die Sozialwissenschaften in der liberalen Demokratie?”, in Wissenschaftsreflexion, Michael Jungert, Andreas Frewer, and Erasmus Mayr (eds.), Paderborn: Mentis Verlag, 395–417. (Scholar)
Landgrebe, Ludwig (ed.), 1972, Philosophie und Wissenschaft: Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie 1969, Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain. (Scholar)
Latour, Bruno, 1999, Politiques de la nature, Paris: Éditions La Découverte. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, Politics of Nature, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Lenhard, Johannes and Eric Winsberg, 2010, “Holism, Entrenchment, and the Future of Climate Model Pluralism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(3): 253–262. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.001 (Scholar)
Leonelli, Sabina, 2012, “Classificatory Theory in Data-Intensive Science: The Case of Open Biomedical Ontologies”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 26(1): 47–65. doi:10.1080/02698595.2012.653119 (Scholar)
Leuschner, Anna, 2018, “Is It Appropriate to ‘Target’ Inappropriate Dissent? On the Normative Consequences of Climate Skepticism”, Synthese, 195(3): 1255–1271. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1267-x (Scholar)
Lewandowsky, Stephan, John Cook, and Elisabeth Lloyd, 2018, “The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ Mechanics of The Rejection of (Climate) Science: Simulating Coherence by Conspiracism”, Synthese, 195(1): 175–196. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1198-6 (Scholar)
Lombardi, Olimpia and Ana Rosa Pérez Ransanz, 2011, “Lenguaje, Ontología y Relaciones Interteóricas: En Favor de Un Genuino Pluralismo Ontológico”, Arbor, 187(747): 43–52. doi:10.3989/arbor.2011.747n1005 (Scholar)
Longino, Helen E., 1987, “Can There Be A Feminist Science?”, Hypatia, 2(3): 51–64. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01341.x (Scholar)
–––, 1990, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “Subjects, Power, and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies of Science”, in Feminist Epistemologies, Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter (eds.), New York: Routledge, 101–120. (Scholar)
–––, 2002a, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2002b, “Reply to Philip Kitcher”, Philosophy of Science, 69(4): 573–577. doi:10.1086/344620 (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “Theoretical Pluralism and the Scientific Study of Behavior”, in Kellert, Longino, and Waters 2006a: 102–131. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Ludwig, David, 2015, A Pluralist Theory of the Mind, (European Studies in Philosophy of Science 2), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22738-2 (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal”, Erkenntnis, 81(6): 1253–1272. doi:10.1007/s10670-015-9793-3 (Scholar)
–––, 2017, “The Objectivity of Local Knowledge. Lessons from Ethnobiology”, Synthese, 194(12): 4705–4720. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1210-1 (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Letting Go of ‘Natural Kind’: Toward a Multidimensional Framework of Nonarbitrary Classification”, Philosophy of Science, 85(1): 31–52. doi:10.1086/694835 (Scholar)
Ludwig, David and Charbel N. El-Hani, 2020, “Philosophy of Ethnobiology: Understanding Knowledge Integration and Its Limitations”, Journal of Ethnobiology, 40(1): 3–20. doi:10.2993/0278-0771-40.1.3 (Scholar)
Ludwig, David, Inkeri Koskinen, Zinhle Mncube, Luana Poliseli, and Luis Reyes-Galindo (eds.), 2021, Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003027140 (Scholar)
Ludwig, David and Daniel A. Weiskopf, 2019, “Ethnoontology: Ways of World‐building across Cultures”, Philosophy Compass, 14(9): e12621. doi:10.1111/phc3.12621 (Scholar)
Macnaghten, Phil, 2020, The Making of Responsible Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108871044 (Scholar)
Magnus, P. D., 2012, Scientific Enquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9781137271259 (Scholar)
Mäki, Uskali, 2013, “Scientific Imperialism: Difficulties in Definition, Identification, and Assessment”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27(3): 325–339. doi:10.1080/02698595.2013.825496 (Scholar)
Mäki, Uskali, Adrian Walsh, and Manuela Fernández Pinto (eds.), 2017, Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315163673 (Scholar)
Mantzavinos, C., 2015, “Scientific Explanation”, in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, second edition, Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes (eds.), Elsevier, 21: 302–307. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.63100-8 (Scholar)
Marchionni, Caterina, 2008, “Explanatory Pluralism and Complementarity: From Autonomy to Integration”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38(3): 314–333. doi:10.1177/0048393108319399 (Scholar)
Massimi, Michela, 2017, “Perspectivism”, in The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, Juha Saatsi (ed.), London: Routledge, 164–175. (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Perspectival Modeling”, Philosophy of Science, 85(3): 335–359. doi:10.1086/697745 (Scholar)
Massimi, Michela and Casey D. McCoy (eds.), 2019, Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects, New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315145198 (Scholar)
Mavhunga, Clapperton Chakanetsa, 2017, What do Science, Technology, and Innovation Mean from Africa? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
McCauley, Robert N. and William Bechtel, 2001, “Explanatory Pluralism and Heuristic Identity Theory”, Theory & Psychology, 11(6): 736–760. doi:10.1177/0959354301116002 (Scholar)
de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada and Kristen Intemann, 2018, The Fight Against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190869229.001.0001 (Scholar)
Merton, Robert K., 1942, “A Note on Science and Technology in a Democratic Order” (also titled “A Note on Science and Democracy”), Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1(1): 115–126. (Scholar)
Mignolo, Walter, 2010, Desobediencia epistémica: retórica de la modernidad, lógica de la colonialidad y gramática de la descolonialidad, Argentina: Ediciones del signo. (Scholar)
Mitchell, Sandra D., 1992, “On Pluralism and Competition in Evolutionary Explanations”, American Zoologist, 32(1): 135–144. doi:10.1093/icb/32.1.135 (Scholar)
–––, 2003, Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802683 (Scholar)
–––, 2009, Unsimple Truth, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Mishler, Brent D. and Michael J. Donoghue, 1982, “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism”, Systematic Zoology, 31(4): 491–503. doi:10.2307/2413371 (Scholar)
Morrison, Margaret, 2011, “One Phenomenon, Many Models: Inconsistency and Complementarity”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42(2): 342–351. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.042 (Scholar)
–––, 2015, Reconstructing Reality: Models, Mathematics, and Simulations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199380275.001.0001 (Scholar)
Muszynski, Eric and Christophe Malaterre, 2020, “A Roadmap to Explanatory Pluralism: Introduction to the Topical Collection The Biology of Behaviour”, Synthese, part of The Biology of Behaviour: Explanatory Pluralism across the Life Sciences topical collection. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02856-0 (Scholar)
Nagel, Ernest, 1961, The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. (Scholar)
Nagel, Thomas, 1986, The View from Nowhere, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Neurath, Otto, 1935, “Einheit der Willenlchaft als Aufgabe”, Erkenntnis, 5(1): 16–22. doi:10.1007/bf00172277 (Scholar)
–––, 1983, “The Orchestration of the Sciences by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism”, in Philosophical Papers 1913–1946: Otto Neurath, Robert Somné Cohen, and Marie Neurath (eds. and trans), Dordrecht, Boston: D. Riedel Pub. Co. (Scholar)
Norton, John D., 2003, “A Material Theory of Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 70(4): 647–670. doi:10.1086/378858 (Scholar)
O’Malley, Maureen A., 2013, “When Integration Fails: Prokaryote Phylogeny and the Tree of Life”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(4): 551–562. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.10.003 (Scholar)
–––, 2014, Philosophy of Microbiology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139162524 (Scholar)
OECD, 2020, “Addressing Societal Challenges Using Transdisciplinary Research”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 88, Paris: OECE Publishing. doi:10.1787/0ca0ca45-en (Scholar)
Oppenheim, Paul and Hilary Putnam, 1958, “The Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis”, in Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem, Herbert Feigl, Michael Scriven, and Grover Maxwell (eds.), (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–36. (Scholar)
Parker, W. S., 2006, “Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling”, Foundations of Science, 11(4): 349–368. doi:10.1007/s10699-005-3196-x (Scholar)
Pincock, Christopher, 2017, “Ernest Nagel’s Naturalism”, in Analytic Philosophy: An Interpretive History, Aaron Preston (ed.), New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
Popa, Elena, 2020, “Mental Health, Normativity, and Local Knowledge in Global Perspective”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 84: 101334. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2020.101334 (Scholar)
Potochnik, Angela, 2017, Idealization and the Aims of Science, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Reisch, George A., 2005, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610318 (Scholar)
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg, 2018, Historische Epistemologie zur Einführung, Hamburg: Junius Verlag. (Scholar)
Rice, Collin, 2019, “Universality and the Problems of Inconsistent Models”, in Massimi and McCoy 2019: 85–108. (Scholar)
Richardson, Alan W., 2006, “The Many Unities of Science: Politics, Semantics, and Ontology”, in Kellert, Longino, and Waters 2006a: 1–25. (Scholar)
Richardson, Robert C., 2009, “Multiple Realization and Methodological Pluralism”, Synthese, 167(3): 473–492. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9387-6 (Scholar)
Rickert, Heinrich, 1896, Die Grenzen Der Naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung, Freiburg: Mohr. (Scholar)
Robles-Piñeros, Jairo, David Ludwig, Geilsa Costa Santos Baptista, and Adela Molina-Andrade, 2020, “Intercultural Science Education as a Trading Zone between Traditional and Academic Knowledge”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 84: 101337. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2020.101337 (Scholar)
Rolin, Kristina, 2017, “Scientific Dissent and a Fair Distribution of Epistemic Responsibility”, Public Affairs Quarterly, 31(3): 209–230. (Scholar)
Rodrik, Dani, 2015, Economics Rules: Why Economics Works, When it Fails, and How to Tell the Difference, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Rueger, Alexander, 2005, “Perspectival Models and Theory Unification”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(3): 579–594. doi:10.1093/bjps/axi128 (Scholar)
Ruphy, Stéphanie, 2005, “Why Metaphysical Abstinence Should Prevail in the Debate on Reductionism”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 19(2): 105–121. doi:10.1080/02698590500249415 (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Are Stellar Kinds Natural Kinds? A Challenging Newcomer in the Monism/Pluralism and Realism/Antirealism Debates”, Philosophy of Science, 77(5): 1109–1120. doi:10.1086/656544 (Scholar)
–––, 2011a, “Limits to Modeling: Balancing Ambition and Outcome in Astrophysics and Cosmology”, Simulation & Gaming, 42(2): 177–194. doi:10.1177/1046878108319640 (Scholar)
–––, 2011b, “From Hacking’s Plurality of Styles of Scientific Reasoning to ‘Foliated’ Pluralism: A Philosophically Robust Form of Ontologico-Methodological Pluralism”, Philosophy of Science, 78(5): 1212–1222. doi:10.1086/664571 (Scholar)
–––, 2016, Scientific Pluralism Reconsidered, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. (Scholar)
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, and Maria Paula Meneses (eds.), 2009, Epistemologias do Sul, Coimbra: Almedina. (Scholar)
Schaffner, Kenneth F., 1967, “Approaches to Reduction”, Philosophy of Science, 34(2): 137–147. doi:10.1086/288137 (Scholar)
Schickore, Jutta and Friedrich Steinle (eds.), 2006, Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction, (Archimedes 14), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4251-5 (Scholar)
Schlick, Moritz, 1918, Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
–––, 1974. General Theory of Knowledge, Vienna: Springer (Scholar)
Schliesser, Eric, 2013, “Philosophic Prophecy”, in Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, Mogens Laerke, Justin E. H. Smith, and Eric Schliesser (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 209–235. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199857142.003.0011 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Contextual Naturalism, Ernest Nagel, and The Philosophy of a Free Society”, Digressions & Impressions, 24 November 2020. Schliesser 220 available online (Scholar)
Slater, Matthew H., 2015, “Natural Kindness”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(2): 375–411. doi:10.1093/bjps/axt033 (Scholar)
Smart, J. J. C., 1978, “The Content of Physicalism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 28(113): 339–341. doi:10.2307/2219085 (Scholar)
Sober, Elliott, 1999, “The Multiple Realizability Argument against Reductionism”, Philosophy of Science, 66(4): 542–564. doi:10.1086/392754 (Scholar)
Solomon, Miriam, 2006a, “Groupthink versus The Wisdom of Crowds: The Social Epistemology of Deliberation and Dissent”, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44(S1): 28–42. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00028.x (Scholar)
–––, 2006b, “Norms of Epistemic Diversity”, Episteme, 3(1–2): 23–36. doi:10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.23 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Agnotology, Hermeneutical Injustice, and Scientific Pluralism: The Case of Asperger Syndrome”, in Science and the Production of Ignorance: When the Quest for Knowledge Is Thwarted, Janet A. Kourany and Martin Carrier (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 145–159. (Scholar)
Spinner, Helmut F., 1968, “Theoretischer Pluralismus: Prolegomena zu einer Kritizistischen Methodologie und Theorie des Erkenntnisfortschritts”, Sozialtheorie und Soziale Praxis. Eduard Baumgarten Zum, 70: 17–41. (Scholar)
Steel, Daniel, 2017, “Qualified Epistemic Priority: Comparing Two Approaches to Values in Science”, in Current Controversies in Values and Science, Kevin C. Elliott and Daniel Steel (eds.), New York: Routledge, 49–63. (Scholar)
Sterner, Beckett, Joeri Witteveen, and Nico Franz, 2020, “Coordinating Dissent as an Alternative to Consensus Classification: Insights from Systematics for Bio-Ontologies”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 42(1): art. 8. doi:10.1007/s40656-020-0300-z (Scholar)
Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten, 2013, “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation”, Research Policy, 42(9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 (Scholar)
Ströker, Elisabeth, 1971, “Die Einheit der Naturwissenschaften. Bemerkungen zu einer fragwürdigen Idee”, Perspektiven der Philosophie, 3: 176–194. (Scholar)
Suppes, Patrick, 1978, “The Plurality of Science”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1978(2): 3–16. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.2.192459 (Scholar)
Tekin, Şerife, 2016, “Are Mental Disorders Natural Kinds? A Plea for a New Approach to Intervention in Psychiatry”, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 23(2): 147–163. doi:10.1353/ppp.2016.0013 (Scholar)
Torretti, Roberto, 2016, “Novedad empírica y creación de conceptos”, Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, 8: 269–299. (Scholar)
Tsou, Jonathan Y., 2015, “DSM-5 and Psychiatry’s Second Revolution: Descriptive vs. Theoretical Approaches to Psychiatric Classification”, in The DSM-5 in Perspective: Philosophical Reflections on the Psychiatric Babel, Steeves Demazeux and Patrick Singy (eds.), (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences 10), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 43–62. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9765-8_3 (Scholar)
Tuana, Nancy, 2010, “Leading with Ethics, Aiming for Policy: New Opportunities for Philosophy of Science”, Synthese, 177(3): 471–492. doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9793-4 (Scholar)
van Fraassen, Bas C., 2008, Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278220.001.0001 (Scholar)
Veigl, Sophie Juliane, forthcoming, “Notes on a Complicated Relationship: Scientific Pluralism, Epistemic Relativism, and Stances”, Synthese, first online: 9 November 2020. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02943-2 (Scholar)
von Bretano, Margherita, 1971, “Wissenschaftspluralismus. Zur Funktion, Genese und Kritik eines Kampfbegriffs”, Das Argument, 66: 476–493. (Scholar)
von Schomberg, René, 2013, “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation”, in Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz (eds.), Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 51–74. doi:10.1002/9781118551424.ch3 (Scholar)
Waters, C. Kenneth, 2017, “No General Structure”, in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: New Essays, Matthew Slater and Zanja Yudell (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 81–108. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199363209.003.0005 (Scholar)
Whyte, Kyle Powys, 2013, “On the Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as a Collaborative Concept: A Philosophical Study”, Ecological Processes, 2(1): art. 7. doi:10.1186/2192-1709-2-7 (Scholar)
Weisberg, Michael, 2007, “Three Kinds of Idealization”, Journal of Philosophy, 104(12): 639–659. doi:10.5840/jphil20071041240 (Scholar)
Weiskopf, Daniel A., 2020, “Anthropic Concepts”, Noûs, 54(2): 451–468. doi:10.1111/nous.12255 (Scholar)
Wilholt, Torsten, 2012, Die Freiheit der Forschung: Begründungen und Begrenzungen, Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag. (Scholar)
Williams, Bernard, 1985 [2011], Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reprinted London: Routledge, 2011. doi:10.4324/9780203828281 (2011) (Scholar)
Wilson, Mitchell, 1993, “DSM-III and the Transformation of American Psychiatry: A History”, American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(3): 399–410. doi:10.1176/ajp.150.3.399 (Scholar)
Winther, Rasmus Grønfeldt, 2020, When Maps Become the World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Winther, Rasmus Grønfeldt and Jonathan Michael Kaplan, 2013, “Ontologies and Politics of Biogenomic ‘Race’”, Theoria, 60(136): 54–80. doi:10.3167/th.2013.6013605 (Scholar)
Wittrock, Christian, Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Auke Pols, Philip Macnaghten, and David Ludwig, 2021, Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation: Organisational and National Conditions, (SpringerBriefs in Ethics), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54286-3 (Scholar)
Wylie, Alison, 2003, “Why Standpoint Matters”, in Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology, Robert Figueroa and Sandra Harding (eds.), New York: Routledge, 26–48. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Feminist Philosophy of Science: Standpoint Matters”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 86(2): 47–76. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “A Plurality of Pluralisms: Collaborative Practice in Archaeology”, in Objectivity in Science, Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson, and Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.), (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 310), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 189–210. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1_10 (Scholar)
Zachar, Peter, 2014, A Metaphysics of Psychopathology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Zachar, Peter, Darrel A. Regier, and Kenneth S. Kendler, 2019, “The Aspirations for a Paradigm Shift in DSM-5: An Oral History”, Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 207(9): 778–784. doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000001063 (Scholar)
Zambrana, Amilcar and G. Cuido C. Machaca Benito, 2014, Pluralismo epistemológico: reflexiones sobre la educación superior en el Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, Cochabamba, Bolivia: FUNPROEIB Andes. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Apr 28 05:35:13 2025

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...