Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Scientific Realism" by Anjan Chakravartty

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Achinstein, Peter, 2002, “Is There a Valid Experimental Argument for Scientific Realism?”, Journal of Philosophy, 99(9): 470–495. doi:10.2307/3655684 (Scholar)
Alai, Mario, 2014, “Novel Predictions and the No Miracle Argument”, Erkenntnis, 79(2): 297–326. doi:10.1007/s10670-013-9495-7 (Scholar)
Alcoff, Linda and Elizabeth Potter (eds.), 1993, Feminist Epistemologies, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
Almeder, Robert, 2007, “Pragmatism and Philosophy of Science: A Critical Survey”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21(2): 171–195. doi:10.1080/02698590701498100 (Scholar)
Aronson, Jerrold L., 1990, “Verisimilitude and Type Hierarchies”, Philosophical Topics, 18(2): 5–28. doi:10.5840/philtopics19901821 (Scholar)
Aronson, Jerrold L., Rom Harré, and Eileen Cornell Way, 1994, Realism Rescued: How Scientific Progress is Possible, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
Asay, Jamin, 2013, “Three Paradigms of Scientific Realism: A Truthmaking Account”: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27(1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/02698595.2013.783971 (Scholar)
Barnes, Barry, David Bloor and John Henry, 1996, Scientific Knowledge, London: Athlone. (Scholar)
Barnes, E.C., 2002, “The Miraculous Choice Argument for Realism”, Philosophical Studies, 111(2): 97–120. doi:10.1023/a:1021204812809 (Scholar)
–––, 2008, The Paradox of Predictivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Ben-Menahem, Yemima, 2006, Conventionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Bird, Alexander, 2000, Thomas Kuhn, Chesham: Acumen. (Scholar)
Blackburn, Simon, 2002, “Realism: Deconstructing the Debate”, Ratio, 15(2): 111–133. doi:10.1111/1467-9329.00180 (Scholar)
Boyd, Richard N., 1983, “On the Current Status of the Issue of Scientific Realism”, Erkenntnis, 19(1/3): 45–90. doi:10.1007/bf00174775 (Scholar)
–––, 1989, “What Realism Implies and What it Does Not”, Dialectica, 43(1–2): 5–29. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00928.x (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “Realism, Approximate Truth and Philosophical Method”, in Savage 1990: 355–391. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, “Kinds as the ‘Workmanship of Men’: Realism, Constructivism, and Natural Kinds”, in J. Nida-Rümelin (ed.), Rationalität, Realismus, Revision: Proceedings of the Third International Congress, Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 52–89. (Scholar)
Brown, Harold I., 1977, Perception, Theory and Commitment: The New Philosophy of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Brown, James Robert, 1982, “The Miracle of Science”, Philosophical Quarterly, 32(128): 232–244. doi:10.2307/2219325 (Scholar)
Busch, Jacob, 2008, “No New Miracles, Same Old Tricks”, Theoria, 74(2): 102–114. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.2008.00011.x (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “Underdetermination and Rational Choice of Theories”, Philosophia, 37(1): 55–65. doi:10.1007/s11406-008-9133-9 (Scholar)
Carnap, Rudolf, 1950, “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology”, Revue Intérnationale de Philosophie, 4: 20–40. Reprinted in Rudolph Carnap, 1956, Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantic and Modal Logic, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Cartwright, Nancy, 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Clarendon. doi:10.1093/0198247044.001.0001 (Scholar)
Chakravartty, Anjan, 1998, “Semirealism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 29: 391–408. (Scholar)
–––, 2007a, A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2007b, “Six Degrees of Speculation: Metaphysics in Empirical Contexts”, in Monton 2007: 183–208. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218844.003.0010 (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “What You Don’t Know Can’t Hurt You: Realism and the Unconceived”, Philosophical Studies, 137(1): 149–158. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9173-1 (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Truth and Representation in Science: Two Inspirations from Art”, in Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 33–50. (Scholar)
–––, 2017, Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Chang, Hasok, 2003, “Preservative Realism and Its Discontents: Revisiting Caloric”, Philosophy of Science, 70(5): 902–912. doi:10.1086/377376 (Scholar)
Churchland, Paul M., 1985, “The Ontological Status of Observables: In Praise of the Superempirical Virtues”, in Churchland & Hooker 1985: 35–47. (Scholar)
Churchland, Paul M. and Clifford A. Hooker (eds.), 1985, Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, (with a reply from Bas C. van Fraassen), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Clarke, Steve, 2001, “Defensible Territory for Entity Realism”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52(4): 701–722. doi:10.1093/bjps/52.4.701 (Scholar)
Collins, Harry and Trevor Pinch, 1993, The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Cordero, Alberto, 2011, “Scientific Realism and the Divide et Impera Strategy: The Ether Saga Revisited”, Philosophy of Science, 78(5): 1120–1130. doi:0.1086/662566 (Scholar)
Crasnow, Sharon L., 2000, “How Natural Can Ontology Be?”, Philosophy of Science, 67(1): 114–132. doi:10.1086/392764 (Scholar)
Cruse, Pierre and David Papineau, 2002, “Scientific Realism Without Reference”, in Michele Marsonet (ed.), The Problem of Realism, London: Ashgate, pp. 174–189. (Scholar)
Day, Mark and George S. Botterill, 2008, “Contrast, Inference and Scientific Realism”, Synthese, 160(2): 249–267. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9117-x (Scholar)
Day, Timothy and Harold Kincaid, 1994, “Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in its Place”, Synthese, 98(2): 271–295. doi:10.1007/bf01063944 (Scholar)
Dellsén, Finnur, 2016, “Explanatory Rivals and the Ultimate Argument”, Theoria, 82(3): 217–237. doi:10.1111/theo.12084 (Scholar)
Devitt, Michael, 1991, Realism and Truth, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “Scientific Realism”, in Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 767–791. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234769.003.0026 (Scholar)
Dicken, Paul, 2013, “Normativity, the Base-rate Fallacy, and Some Problems for Retail Realism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(4): 563–570. (Scholar)
Dicken, Paul and Peter Lipton, 2006, “What can Bas Believe? Musgrave and van Fraassen on Observability”, Analysis, 66(291): 226–233. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00619.x (Scholar)
Doppelt, Gerald, 2007, “Reconstructing Scientific Realism to Rebut the Pessimistic Meta-Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 74(1): 96–118. doi:10.1086/520685 (Scholar)
Duhem, Pierre Maurice Marie, [1906] 1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Philip P. Wiener (tr.), Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Dupré, John, 1993, The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Earman, John, 1993, “Underdetermination, Realism, and Reason”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18: 19–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1993.tb00255.x (Scholar)
Egg, Matthias, 2012, “Causal Warrant for Realism about Particle Physics”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 43(2): 259–280. doi:10.1007/s10838-012-9202-4 (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Expanding Our Grasp: Causal Knowledge and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(1): 115–141. doi:10.1093/bjps/axu025 (Scholar)
Ellis, Brian, 1988, “Internal Realism”, Synthese, 76(3): 409–434. doi:10.1007/bf00869609 (Scholar)
Elsamahi, Mohamed, 1994, “Could Theoretical Entities Save Realism?”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting, 1994(1): 173–180. (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “A Critique of Localised Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 72(5): 1350–1360. doi:10.1086/508973 (Scholar)
Eronen, Markus I., 2015, “Robustness and Reality”, Synthese, 192(12): 3961–3977. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0801-6 (Scholar)
Fahrbach, Ludwig, 2011, “How the Growth of Science Ends Theory Change”, Synthese, 180(2): 139–155. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9602-0 (Scholar)
Fine, Arthur, 1986a, “Unnatural Attitudes: Realist and Antirealist Attachments to Science”, Mind, 95(378): 149–177. doi:10.1093/mind/xcv.378.149 (Scholar)
–––, [1986b] 1996, The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and The Quantum Theory, 2^nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, “Piecemeal Realism”, Philosophical Studies, 61(1): 79–96. doi:10.1007/bf00385834 (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “Fictionalism”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18: 1–18. (Scholar)
Forbes, Curtis, forthcoming, “A Pragmatic, Existentialist Approach to the Scientific Realism Debate”, Synthese, first online: 12 February 2016. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1015-2. (Scholar)
Franklin, Allan, 1986, The Neglect of Experiment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1990, Experiment, Right or Wrong, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
French, Steven, 1998, “On the Withering Away of Physical Objects”, in E. Castellani (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 93–113. (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “Structure as a Weapon of the Realist”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106(1): 170–187. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00143.x (Scholar)
–––, 2014, The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
French, Steven and H. Kamminga (eds.), 1993, Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
Friedman, Michael, 1999, Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Frigg, Roman and Ioannis Votsis, 2011, “Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Structural Realism but were Afraid to Ask”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(2): 227–276. doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0025-7 (Scholar)
Frost-Arnold, Greg, 2010, “The No-Miracles Argument for Realism: Inference to an Unacceptable Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, 77(1): 35–58. doi:10.1086/650207 (Scholar)
Giere, Ronald N., 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Giere, Ronald N. and Alan W. Richardson, 1997, Origins of Logical Empiricism (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 16), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, 2008, “Recurrent Transient Underdetermination and the Glass Half Full”, Philosophical Studies, 137(1): 141–148. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9172-2 (Scholar)
Hacking, Ian, 1982, “Experimentation and Scientific Realism”, Philosophical Topics, 13(1): 71–87. doi:10.5840/philtopics19821314 (Scholar)
–––, 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1985, “Do We See Through a Microscope?”, in Churchland & Hooker 1985: 132–152. (Scholar)
Haraway, Donna, 1988, “Situated Knowledges”, Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575–600. doi:10.2307/3178066 (Scholar)
Hardin, Clyde L. and Alexander Rosenberg, 1982, “In Defence of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 49(4): 604–615. doi:10.1086/289080 (Scholar)
Harding, Sandra, 1986, The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
Harker, David, 2008, “On the Predilections for Predictions”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59(3): 429–453. doi:10.1093/bjps/axn017 (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Two Arguments for Scientific Realism Unified”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41: 192–202. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “How to Split a Theory: Defending Selective Realism and Convergence without Proximity”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64(1): 79–106. doi:10.1093/bjps/axr059 (Scholar)
Harman, Gilbert H., 1965, “The Inference to the Best Explanation”,Philosophical Review, 74(1): 88–95. doi:10.2307/2183532 (Scholar)
Hitchcock, Christopher and Elliott Sober, 2004, “Prediction versus Accommodation and the Risk of Overfitting”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(1): 1–34. doi:10.1093/bjps/55.1.1 (Scholar)
Horwich, Paul (ed.), 1993, World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul, 1993, Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: The Philosophy of Science of Thomas S. Kuhn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Howson, Colin, 2000, Hume’s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198250371.001.0001 (Scholar)
Humphreys, Paul, 2004, Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195158709.001.0001 (Scholar)
James, William, [1907] 1979, Pragmatism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Jones, Roger, 1991, “Realism About What?”, Philosophy of Science, 58(2): 185–202. doi:10.1086/289611 (Scholar)
Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1985, Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
Khalifa, Kareem, 2010, “Default Privilege and Bad Lots: Underconsideration and Explanatory Inference”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 24(1): 91–105. doi:10.1080/02698590903467135 (Scholar)
Kitcher, Philip, 1993, The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Real Realism: The Galilean Strategy”, The Philosophical Review, 110(2): 151–197. doi:10.2307/2693674 (Scholar)
Kochan, Jeff, 2010, “Contrastive Explanation and the ‘Strong Programme’ in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge”, Social Studies of Science, 40(1): 127–144. doi:10.1177/0306312709104780 (Scholar)
Knorr-Cetina, Karin D., 1981, The Manufacture of Knowledge, Oxford: Pergamon. (Scholar)
Kourany, Janet A., 2010, Philosophy of Science after Feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Kripke, Saul A., 1980, Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Kuhn, Thomas S., [1962] 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1983, “Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting, 1982(2): 669–688. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, The Road Since Structure, J. Conant & J. Haugeland (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Kukla, Andre, 1998, Studies in Scientific Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Kusch, Martin, 2002, Knowledge by Agreement: the Programme of Communitarian Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199251223.001.0001 (Scholar)
Ladyman, James, 1998, “What is Structural Realism?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29: 409–424. (Scholar)
Ladyman, James, Igor Douven, Leon Horsten, and Bas C. van Fraassen, 1997, “A Defence of van Fraassen’s Critique of Abductive Inference: Reply to Psillos”, Philosophical Quarterly, 47(188): 305–321. (Scholar)
Ladyman, James and Don Ross, 2007, Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001 (Scholar)
Landig, Anders, 2014, “Partial Reference, Scientific Realism and Possible Worlds”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 47: 1–9. (Scholar)
Lange, Marc, 2002, “Baseball, Pessimistic Inductions and the Turnover Fallacy”, Analysis, 62(276): 281–285. doi:10.1111/1467-8284.00368 (Scholar)
Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar, [1979] 1986, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, (2nd ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Laudan, Larry, 1981, “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 48: 19–48. (Scholar)
–––, 1984, “Discussion: Realism Without the Real”, Philosophy of Science, 51(1): 156–162. doi:10.1086/289171 (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “Demystifying Underdetermination”, in Savage 1990: 267–297. (Scholar)
Laudan, Larry and Jarrett Leplin, 1991, “Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination”, Journal of Philosophy, 88(9): 449–472. doi:10.2307/2026601 (Scholar)
Leeds, Stephen, 2007, “Correspondence Truth and Scientific Realism”, Synthese, 159(1): 1–21. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9064-6 (Scholar)
Leplin, Jarrett, 1981, “Truth and Scientific Progress”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 12: 269–292. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, A Novel Defence of Scientific Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Lewens, Tim, 2005, “Realism and the Strong Program”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(3): 559–577. doi:10.1093/bjps/axi125 (Scholar)
Lewis, Peter J., 2001, “Why the Pessimistic Induction is a Fallacy”, Synthese, 129(3): 371–380. doi:10.1023/a:1013139410613 (Scholar)
Lipton, Peter, 1990, “Prediction and Prejudice”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 4(1): 51–65. doi:10.1080/02698599008573345 (Scholar)
–––, [1991] 2004, Inference to the Best Explanation, 2^nd edition. London: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “Is the Best Good Enough?”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 93: 89–104. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, “Truth, Existence, and the Best Explanation”, in A. A. Derksen (ed.), The Scientific Realism of Rom Harré, Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, pp. 89–111. (Scholar)
Lloyd, Elisabeth A., 2006, The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Longino, Helen, 1990, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Lyons, Timothy D., 2003, “Explaining the Success of a Scientific Theory”, Philosophy of Science, 70(5): 891–901. doi:10.1086/377375 (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “Towards a Purely Axiological Scientific Realism”, Erkenntnis, 63(2): 167–204. doi:10.1007/s10670-005-3225-8 (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “Scientific Realism and the Stratagema de Divide et Impera”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(3): 537–560. doi:10.1093/bjps/axl021 (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “A Historically Informed Modus Ponens Against Scientific Realism: Articulation, Critique, and Restoration”, International Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27: 369–392. (Scholar)
Magnus, P.D., 2010, “Inductions, Red Herrings, and the Best Explanation for the Mixed Record of Science”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(4): 803–819. doi:10.1093/bjps/axq004 (Scholar)
Magnus, P.D. and Jacob Busch (eds.), 2010, New Waves in Philosophy of Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
Magnus, P.D. and Craig Callender, 2004, “Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy”, Philosophy of Science, 71(3): 320–338. doi:10.1086/421536 (Scholar)
Massimi, Michela, 2004, “Non-Defensible Middle Ground for Experimental Realism: Why We are Justified to Believe in Colored Quarks”, Philosophy of Science, 71(1): 36–60. doi:10.1086/381412 (Scholar)
Maxwell, Grover, 1962, “On the Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities”, in H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–26. (Scholar)
McAllister, James W., 1993, “Scientific Realism and the Criteria for Theory-Choice”, Erkenntnis, 38(2): 203–222. doi:10.1007/bf01128980 (Scholar)
Mcarthur, Dan, 2006, “The Anti-Philosophical Stance, the Realism Question and Scientific Practice”, Foundations of Science, 11(4): 369–397. doi:10.1007/s10699-005-3198-8 (Scholar)
McLeish, Christina, 2005, “Realism Bit by Bit: Part I: Kitcher on Reference”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36: 667–685. (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “Realism Bit by Bit: Part 2: Disjunctive Partial Reference”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37: 171–190. (Scholar)
Menke, Cornelia, 2014, “Does the Miracle Argument Embody a Base Rate Fallacy?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 45: 103–108. (Scholar)
Miller, Boaz, 2016, “What is Hacking’s Argument for Entity Realism?”, Synthese, 193(3): 991–1006. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0789-y (Scholar)
Miller, David, 1974, “Popper’s Qualitative Theory of Verisimilitude”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25(2): 166–177. doi:10.1093/bjps/25.2.166 (Scholar)
–––, 1976, “Verisimilitude Redeflated”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27(4): 363–380. doi:10.1093/bjps/27.4.363 (Scholar)
Miller, Richard W., 1987, Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation and Reality in the Natural and the Social Sciences, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Misak, Cheryl, 2010, “The Pragmatic Maxim: How to Get Leverage on a Concept”, The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 17: 76–87. [Misak 2010 available online] (Scholar)
Mizrahi, Moti, 2015, “Historical Inductions: New Cherries, Same Old Cherry-picking”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 29(2): 129–148. doi:10.1080/02698595.2015.1119413 (Scholar)
Monton, Bradley (ed.), 2007, Images of Empiricism: Essays on Science and Stances, with a Reply From Bas C. Van Fraassen. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218844.001.0001 (Scholar)
Morganti, Matteo, 2004, “On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism”, Synthese, 142(1): 81–107. doi:10.1023/b:synt.0000047712.39407.c3 (Scholar)
Morrison, Margaret, 1990, “Theory, Intervention and Realism”, Synthese, 82(1): 1–22. doi:10.1007/bf00413667 (Scholar)
Muller, F.A., 2004, “Can a Constructive Empiricist Adopt the Concept of Observability?”, Philosophy of Science, 71(4): 637–654. doi:10.1093/phisci/axi103 (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “The Deep Black Sea: Observability and Modality Afloat”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(1): 61–99. (Scholar)
Musgrave, Alan, 1985, “Constructive Empiricism and Realism”, in Churchland & Hooker 1985: 197–221. (Scholar)
–––, 1988, “The Ultimate Argument for Scientific Realism”, in Robert Nola (ed.), Relativism and Realism in Sciences, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 229–252. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, “Noa’s Ark—Fine for Realism”, Philosophical Quarterly, 39(157): 383–398. doi:10.2307/2219825 (Scholar)
–––, 1992, “Discussion: Realism About What?”, Philosophy of Science, 59(4): 691–697. doi:10.1086/289702 (Scholar)
Nelson, Lynn Harkinson and Jack Nelson (eds.), 1996, Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
Niiniluoto, Ilkka, 1987, Truthlikeness, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
–––, 1998, “Verisimilitude: The Third Period”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49(1): 1–29. doi:10.1093/bjps/49.1.1 (Scholar)
–––, 1999, Critical Scientific Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Nola, Robert, 2008, “The Optimistic Meta-Induction and Ontological Continuity: The Case of the Electron”, in L. Soler, H. Sankey, & P. Hoyningen-Huene (eds.), Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities?, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 159–202. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_12 (Scholar)
Northcott, Robert, 2013, “Verisimilitude: A Causal Approach”, Synthese, 190(9): 1471–1488. doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9895-7 (Scholar)
Oddie, Graham, 1986a, “The Poverty of the Popperian Program for Truthlikeness”, Philosophy of Science, 53(2): 163–178. doi:10.1086/289305 (Scholar)
–––, 1986b, Likeness to Truth, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
Okasha, Samir, 2002, “Underdetermination, Holism and the Theory/Data Distinction”, Philosophical Quarterly, 52(208): 302–319. (Scholar)
Papineau, David, 2010, “Realism, Ramsey Sentences and the Pessimistic Meta-Induction”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41: 375–385. (Scholar)
Park, Seungbae, 2016, “Extensional Scientific Realism vs. Intensional Scientific Realism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 59: 46–52. (Scholar)
Peirce, Charles S., [1992] 1998, The Essential Peirce, 2 volumes (volume 1 edited by N. Houser & C. Kloesel; volume 2 edited by the Peirce Edition Project), Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
Peters, Dean, 2014, “What Elements of Successful Scientific Theories Are the Correct Targets for ‘Selective’ Scientific Realism?”, Philosophy of Science, 81(3): 377–397. doi:10.1086/676537 (Scholar)
Pickering, Andrew, 1984, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
Poincaré, Henri, [1905] 1952, Science and Hypothesis, New York: Dover. (Scholar)
Popper, Karl R., 1972, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Knowledge, 4^th edition, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
Post, H.R., 1971, “Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: In Praise of Conservative Induction”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2: 213–255. (Scholar)
Psillos, Stathis, 1995, “Is Structural Realism the Best of Both Worlds?”, Dialectica, 49(1): 15–46. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1995.tb00113.x (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “On van Fraassen’s Critique of Abductive Reasoning”, Philosophical Quarterly, 46(182): 31–47. doi:10.2307/2956303 (Scholar)
–––, 1999, Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Is Structural Realism Possible?”, Philosophy of Science, 68(S3): S13–S24. doi:10.1086/392894 (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “The, Structure, the Whole, Structure and Nothing But, the Structure?”, Philosophy of Science, 73(5): 560–570. doi:10.1086/518326 (Scholar)
–––, 2009, Knowing the Structure of Nature: Essays on Realism and Explanation, London: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
Putnam, Hilary, 1975a, Mathematics, Matter and Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, [1975b] 1985, Philosophical Papers, vol. 2: Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1978, Meaning and the Moral Sciences, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 1981, Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1982, “Three Kinds of Scientific Realism”, Philosophical Quarterly, 32(128): 195–200. doi:10.2307/2219323 (Scholar)
Quine, W.V.O, 1953, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, in From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46. (Scholar)
–––, 1975, “On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World”, Erkenntnis, 9(3): 313–328. doi:10.1007/bf00178004 (Scholar)
Resnik, David B., 1994, “Hacking’s Experimental Realism”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24(3): 395–412. doi:10.1080/00455091.1994.10717376 (Scholar)
Richardson, Alan W., 1998, Carnap’s Construction of the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Richardson, Alan W. and Thomas Uebel (eds.), 2007, The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Rosen, Gideon, 1994, “What is Constructive Empiricism?”, Philosophical Studies, 74(2): 143–178. doi:10.1007/bf00989801 (Scholar)
Rouse, Joseph, 1988, “Arguing for the Natural Ontological Attitude”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting, 1988(1): 294–301. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, “The Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science”, Philosophy of Science, 58(4): 607–627. doi:10.1086/289643 (Scholar)
Roush, Sherri, 2010, “Optimism about the Pessimistic Induction”, in Magnus & Busch 2010: 29–58. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “The Rationality of Science in Relation to its History”, in W. J. Devlin & A. Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions—50 Years On, (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 71–90. (Scholar)
Rowbottom, Darrell P., 2011, “The Instrumentalist’s New Clothes”, Philosophy of Science, 78(5): 1200–1211. doi:10.1086/662267 (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Aimless Science”, Synthese, 191(6): 1211–1221. doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0319-8 (Scholar)
Saatsi, Juha T., 2005a, “Reconsidering the Fresnel-Maxwell Theory Shift: How the Realist Can Have Her Cake and EAT it Too”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36: 509–538. (Scholar)
–––, 2005b, “On the Pessimistic Induction and Two Fallacies”, Philosophy of Science, 72(5): 1088–1098. doi:10.1086/508959 (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Form-driven vs. Content-driven Arguments for Realism”, in Magnus & Busch 2010: 8–28. (Scholar)
Salmon, Wesley C., 1984, Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Sankey, Howard, 1994, The Incommensurability Thesis, London: Ashgate. (Scholar)
Savage, C. Wade (ed.), 1990, Scientific Theories (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 14), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
Shapere, Dudley, 1982, “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy”, Philosophy of Science, 49(4): 485–525. doi:10.1086/289075 (Scholar)
Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer, 1985, Leviathan and the Air Pump, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Smart, J.J.C., 1963, Philosophy and Scientific Realism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
Smith, Peter, 1998, “Approximate Truth and Dynamical Theories”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49(2): 253–277. doi:10.1093/bjps/49.2.253 (Scholar)
Sober, Elliott, 2015, “Two Cornell Realisms: Moral and Scientific”, Philosophical Studies, 172(4): 905–924. doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0300-5 (Scholar)
Stanford, P. Kyle, 2001, “Refusing the Devil’s Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?”, Philosophy of Science, 68(S3): S1–S12. doi:10.1086/392893 (Scholar)
–––, 2003a, “Pyrrhic Victories for Scientific Realism”, Journal of Philosophy, 100(11): 553–572. (Scholar)
–––, 2003b, “No Refuge for Realism: Selective Confirmation and the History of Science” , Philosophy of Science, 70(5): 913–925. doi:10.1086/377377 (Scholar)
–––, 2006, Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “Catastrophism, Uniformitarianism, and a Scientific Realism Debate that Makes a Difference”, Philosophy of Science, 82(5): 867–878. doi:10.1086/683325 (Scholar)
Tichý, Pavel, 1974, “On Popper’s Definitions of Verisimilitude”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25(2): 155–160. doi:10.1093/bjps/25.2.155 (Scholar)
–––, 1976, “Verisimilitude Redefined”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27(1): 25–42. doi:10.1093/bjps/27.1.25 (Scholar)
–––, 1978, “Verisimilitude Revisited”, Synthese, 38(2): 175–196. doi:10.1007/bf00486149 (Scholar)
Turner, Derek, 2007, Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Vaihinger, Hans, [1911] 1923, The Philosophy of “As If”, C.K. Ogden (tr.), London: Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
van Dyck, Maarten, 2007, “Constructive Empiricism and the Argument from Underdetermination”, in Monton 2007: 11–31. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218844.003.0002 (Scholar)
van Fraassen, Bas C., 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1985, “Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science”, in Churchland & Hooker 1985: 245–308. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, Laws and Symmetry, Oxford: Clarendon. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, “Gideon Rosen on Constructive Empiricism”, Philosophical Studies, 74(2): 179–192. doi:10.1007/bf00989802 (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Constructive Empiricism Now”, Philosophical Studies, 106(1): 151–170. doi:10.1023/a:1013126824473 (Scholar)
Vickers, Peter, 2013, “A Confrontation of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 80(2): 189–211. doi:10.1086/670297 (Scholar)
Votsis, Ioannis, 2003, “Is Structure Not Enough?”, Philosophy of Science, 70(5): 879–890. doi:10.1086/377374 (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “The Prospective Stance in Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 78(5): 1223–1234. doi:10.1086/662535 (Scholar)
Weber, Marcell, 2014, “Reference, Truth, and Biological Kinds”, in J. Dutant, D. Fassio & A. Meylan (eds.) Liber Amicorum Pascal Engel, Geneva: Université de Genève, pp. 422–448. (Scholar)
Weston, Thomas, 1992, “Approximate Truth and Scientific Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 59(1): 53–74. doi:10.1086/289654 (Scholar)
White, Roger, 2003, “The Epistemic Advantage of Prediction Over Accommodation”, Mind, 112(448): 654–683. doi:10.1093/mind/112.448.653 (Scholar)
Worrall, John, 1989, “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?”, Dialectica, 43(1–2): 99–124. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Underdetermination, Realism and Empirical Equivalence”, Synthese, 180(2): 157–172. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9599-4 (Scholar)
Wray, K. Brad, 2007, “A Selectionist Explanation of the Success and Failures of Science”, Erkenntnis, 67(1): 81–89. doi:10.1007/s10670-007-9046-1 (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “The Argument from Underconsideration as Grounds for Anti-Realism: A Defence”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22(3): 317–326. doi:10.1080/02698590802567399 (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Selection and Predictive Success”, Erkenntnis, 72(3): 365–377. doi:10.1007/s10670-009-9206-6 (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “Pessimistic Inductions: Four Varieties”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 29(1): 61–73. doi:10.1080/02698595.2015.1071551 (Scholar)
Wylie, Alison, 1986, “Arguments for Scientific Realism: The Ascending Spiral”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 23(3): 287–298. (Scholar)
Zammito, John H., 2004, A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)

Generated Tue May 30 03:16:33 2023

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...