Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Underdetermination of Scientific Theory" by Kyle Stanford
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Achinstein, P., 2002, “Is There A Valid Experimental Argument for Scientific Realism?”, Journal of Philosophy, 99: 470–495. (Scholar)
- Bonk, T., 2008, Underdetermination: An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. (Scholar)
- Belot, G., 2015, “Down to Earth Underdetermination”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91: 455–464. (Scholar)
- Butterfield, J., 2014, “On Underdetermination in Cosmology”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46: 57–69. (Scholar)
- Carman, C., 2005, “The Electrons of the Dinosaurs and the Center of the Earth”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36: 171–174. (Scholar)
- Chakravartty, A., 2008, “What You Don’t Know Can’t Hurt You: Realism and the Unconceived”, Philosophical Studies, 137: 149–158. (Scholar)
- Cleland, C., 2002, “Methodological and Epistemic Differences Between Historical Science and Experimental Science”, Philosophy of Science, 69: 474–496. (Scholar)
- Descartes, R., [1640] 1996, Meditations on First Philosophy, trans. by John Cottingham, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Devitt, M., 2011, “Are Unconceived Alternatives a Problem for Scientific Realism”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 42: 285–293. (Scholar)
- Duhem, P., [1914] 1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, trans. from 2nd ed. by P. W. Wiener; originally published as La Théorie Physique: Son Objet et sa Structure (Paris: Marcel Riviera & Cie.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Earman, J., 1993, “Underdetermination, Realism, and Reason”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18: 19–38. (Scholar)
- Feyerabend, P., 1975, Against Method, London: Verso. (Scholar)
- Forber, P. and Griffith, E., 2011, “Historical Reconstruction: Gaining Epistemic Access to the Deep Past”, Philosophy and Theory in Biology, 3. doi:10.3998/ptb.6959004.0003.003 (Scholar)
- Gilles, D., 1993, “The Duhem Thesis and the Quine Thesis,”, in Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 98–116. (Scholar)
- Glymour, C., 1970, “Theoretical Equivalence and Theoretical Realism”, Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1970: 275–288. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, “The Epistemology of Geometry”, Noûs, 11: 227–251. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, Theory and Evidence, Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Theoretical Equivalence and the Semantic View of Theories”, Philosophy of Science, 80: 286–297. (Scholar)
- Godfrey-Smith, P., 2008, “Recurrent, Transient Underdetermination and the Glass Half-Full”, Philosophical Studies, 137: 141–148. (Scholar)
- Goodman, N., 1955, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. (Scholar)
- Halvorson, H., 2012, “What Scientific Theories Could Not Be”, Philosophy of Science, 79: 183–206. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic”, Philosophy of Science, 80: 475–478. (Scholar)
- Hesse, M., 1980, Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Brighton: Harvester Press. (Scholar)
- Kitcher, P., 1993, The Advancement of Science, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, T., [1962] 1996, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3rd edition. (Scholar)
- Kukla, A., 1996, “Does Every Theory Have Empirically Equivalent Rivals?”, Erkenntnis, 44: 137–166. (Scholar)
- Lakatos, I. 1970, “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196. (Scholar)
- Laudan, L., 1990, “Demystifying Underdetermination”, in Scientific Theories, C. Wade Savage (ed.), (Series: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 14), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 267–297. (Scholar)
- Laudan, L. and Leplin, J., 1991, “Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination”, Journal of Philosophy, 88: 449–472. (Scholar)
- Leplin, J., 1997, A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Lyons, T., 2013, “A Historically Informed Modus Ponens Against Scientific Realism: Articulation, Critique, and Restoration”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27: 369–392. (Scholar)
- Magnus, P. 2006, “What’s New About the New Induction?”, Synthese, 148: 295–301. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Inductions, Red Herrings, and the Best Explanation for the Mixed Record of Science”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61: 803–819. (Scholar)
- Manchak, J. 2009, “Can We Know the Global Structure of Spacetime?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40: 53–56. (Scholar)
- Mill, J. S., [1867] 1900, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, New York: Longmans, Green, and Co. (Scholar)
- Miyake, T., 2015, “Underdetermination and Decomposition in Kepler’s Astronomia Nova”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 50: 20–27. (Scholar)
- Norton, J. 2008, “Must Evidence Underdetermine Theory?”, in The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited, M. Carrier, D. Howard, and J. Kourany (eds.), Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 17–44. (Scholar)
- Pietsch, W., 2012, “Hidden Underdetermination: A Case Study in Classical Electrodynamics”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 26: 125–151. (Scholar)
- Quine, W. V. O., 1951, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, 2nd Ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46. (Scholar)
- –––, 1955, “Posits and Reality”, reprinted in The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd Ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 246–254. (Scholar)
- –––, 1969, “Epistemology Naturalized”, in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90. (Scholar)
- –––, 1975, “On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World”, Erkenntnis, 9: 313–328. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “Three Indeterminacies”, in Perspectives on Quine, R. B. Barrett and R. F. Gibson, (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 1–16. (Scholar)
- Ruhmkorff, S., 2011, “Some Difficulties for the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives”, Philosophy of Science, 78: 875–886. (Scholar)
- Shapin, S. and Shaffer, S., 1982, Leviathan and the Air Pump, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Sklar, L., 1975, “Methodological Conservatism”, Philosophical Review, 84: 384–400. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, “Do Unborn Hypotheses Have Rights?”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62: 17–29. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, “Saving the Noumena”, Philosophical Topics, 13: 49–72. (Scholar)
- Stanford, P. K., 2001, “Refusing the Devil’s Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?”, Philosophy of Science, 68: S1–S12. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Getting Real: The Hypothesis of Organic Fossil Origins”, The Modern Schoolman, 87: 219–243 (Scholar)
- Tulodziecki, D., 2012, “Epistemic Equivalence and Epistemic Incapacitation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63: 313–328. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Underdetermination, Methodological Practices, and Realism”, Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 190: 3731–3750. (Scholar)
- Turner, D., 2005, “Local Underdetermination in Historical Science”, Philosophy of Science, 72: 209–230. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Van Fraassen, B., 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Werndl, C., 2013, “On Choosing Between Deterministic and Indeterministic Models: Underdetermination and Indirect Evidence”, Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 190: 2243–2265. (Scholar)
