Primary Literature

• Asmis, E., S. Bartsch, and M. Nussbaum (eds.), 2010–2017, The Complete Works of Lucius Anneaus Seneca, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Braund, S. (ed.), 2009, Seneca: De Clementia, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Cooper, J.M. and J.F. Procopé (eds. and trans.), 1995, Seneca: Moral and Political Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Graver, M. and A.A. Long (trans.), 2017, Seneca: Letters on Ethics to Lucilius, E. Asmis, S. Bartsch, and M. Nussbaum (eds.), Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Griffin, M. and B. Inwood. (trans.), 2011, Seneca: On Benefits, The Complete Works of Lucius Anneaus Seneca, E. Asmis, S. Bartsch, and M. Nussbaum (eds.), Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Hine, H.M. (ed.), 1996, L. Annaei Senecae Naturalium Quaestionum Libros, Stuttgart and Leipzig: Teubner. (Scholar)
• Hine, H.H. (trans.), 2010, Seneca: Natural Questions, The Complete Works of Lucius Anneaus Seneca, E. Asmis, S. Bartsch, and M. Nussbaum (eds.), Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Inwood, B. (trans.), 2007, Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters, with an introduction and commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Kaster, R. and M. Nussbaum (trans.), 2010, Seneca: Anger, Mercy, Revenge. The Complete Works of Lucius Anneaus Seneca, E. Asmis, S. Bartsch, and M. Nussbaum (eds.), Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Ker, J., E. Fantham, H.M. Hine, and G.D. Williams (trans.), 2014, Seneca: Hardship and Happiness, E. Asmis, S. Bartsch, and M. Nussbaum (eds.), Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Reynolds, L.D. (ed.), 1965, L. Annaei Senecae Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales (Oxford Classical Texts), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Reynolds, L.D. (ed.), 1977, L. Annaei Senecae Dialogorum libri duodecim, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Williams, G. (ed. and trans.), 2003, Seneca: De Otio and De Breuitate Vitae, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)

Secondary literature

• Aikin, S., 2017, “Seneca on Surpassing God,” The Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 3.1: 22–31. (Scholar)
• Annas, J., 1993, The Morality of Happiness, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Asmis, E., 2009, “Seneca on fortune and the kingdom of god,” in S. Bartsch and D. Wray (eds.), Seneca and the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115–138. (Scholar)
• Barnes, J., 1997, Logic and the Imperial Stoa, Leiden and New York: Brill. (Scholar)
• Bartsch, S., 2009, “Senecan metaphor and Stoic self-instruction,” in S. Bartsch and D. Wray (eds.), Seneca and the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 188–217. (Scholar)
• Boys-Stones, G. 2013, “Seneca against Plato: Letters 58 and 65,” in A.G. Long (ed.), Plato and the Stoics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 128–146. (Scholar)
• Busch, A., 2009, “Dissolution of the self in the Senecan corpus,” in S. Bartsch and D. Wray (eds.), Seneca and the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 255–282. (Scholar)
• Cooper, J. M., 1999, “Posidonius on Emotions”, in Cooper, Reason and Emotion. Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 449–484. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Moral Theory and Moral Improvement: Seneca,” in Cooper, Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 309–334. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “The Emotional Life of the Wise,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43: 176–218. (Scholar)
• Dihle, A., 1982, The Theory of the Will in Classical Antiquity, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Donini, P.-L., 1979, Modelli Filosofici e Letterari: Lucrezia, Orazio, Seneca, Bologna: Pitagora Editrice. (Scholar)
• –––,1982, Le scuole, l’anima, l’impero: la filosofia antica da Antioco a Platino, Turin: Rosemberg and Sellier. (Scholar)
• Edwards, C., 1997, “Self-scrutiny and self-transformation in Seneca’s Letters”, Greece & Rome, 44: 23–38. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Free yourself! Slavery, freedom and the self in Seneca’s Letters,” in S. Bartsch and D. Wray (eds.), Seneca and the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–159. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014,“Ethics V: Death and Time,” in Damschen and A. Heil (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Seneca, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 323–342. (Scholar)
• Fantham, E., 1982, Seneca’s Troades: a literary introduction with text, translation, and commentary, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Fillion-Lahille, Janine, 1984, Le De Ira de Sénèque et La philosophie stoïcienne des passions, Paris: Klincksieck. (Scholar)
• Fischer, S.E., 2014, “Systematic Connections between Seneca’s Philosophical Works and Tragedies,” in G. Damschen and A. Heil (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Seneca, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 745–768. (Scholar)
• Foucault, M., 1986, The Care of the Self (The History of Sexuality: Volume 3), trans. R. Hurley, New York: Pantheon. (Scholar)
• –––, 1988, Technologies of the Self, L.H. Martin et al. (eds.), Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, The Hermeneutics of the Subject (Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982), G. Burchell (trans.), New York and London: Picador. (Translation of Foucault, L’Hermeneutique du sujet, Cour au Collège de France 1981–1982, F. Gros (ed.), Paris.) (Scholar)
• Fournier, M., 2009, “Seneca on Platonic Apatheia,” Classica et Mediaevalia, 60: 211–236. (Scholar)
• Frede, M., 2011, A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, A. A. Long (ed.), foreword by David Sedley, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Gartner, C., 2015. “The Possibility of Psychic Conflict in Seneca’s De Ira,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23: 213–233. (Scholar)
• Gianella, N. J., 2019, “The Freedom to Give: The Legal Basis of Seneca’s Treatment of Slaves in De Beneficiis,” Classical Philology, 114: 79–99. (Scholar)
• Gill, Ch., 2003, “The School in the Roman Imperial Period,” in B. Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–58. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Seneca and selfhood: integration and disintegration,” in S. Bartsch and D. Wray (eds.), Seneca and the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 65–83. (Scholar)
• Gloyn, L., 2017, The Ethics of the Family in Seneca, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Graver, M., 2007, Stoicism and Emotion, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “The Emotional Intelligence of Epicureans,” in Williams and Volk (eds.), Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 193–207. (Scholar)
• –––, 2023, Seneca: The Literary Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ch. 1: “The Life of the Mind: Seneca and the Contemplatio Veri,” 17–39; (Scholar)
  • Ch. 3: “The Treatise On Benefits: Real Kindness and Real Agency,” 57–83; (Scholar)
  • Ch. 7: “The Weeping Wise: Stoic and Epicurean Consolations in Seneca’s 99^th Letter,” 160–175; (Scholar)
  • Ch. 12: “Honeybee Reading and Self-Scripting,” 262–283. (Scholar)
• Griffin, M., 1992, Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics 2^nd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Seneca’s Pedagogic Strategy: Letters and De Beneficiis,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 50: 89–113. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, Seneca on Society: A Guide to the De Beneficiis, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, Politics and Philosophy at Rome, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Hadot, I., 1969, Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophy Bd. 13, Berlin: de Gruyter. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Getting to Goodness: Reflections on Chapter 10 of Brad Inwood, Reading Seneca,” in Colish and Wildberger (eds.), Seneca Philosophus, Berlin: DeGruyter: 9–42. (Scholar)
• Hadot, P., 1995, Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, Arnold Davidson (ed.), Michael Chase (trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Harich, H., 1993, “Zur Präsenz des Weiblichen und zur Einschätzung der Frau bei Seneca,” Grazer Studien, 19: 129–155. (Scholar)
• Inwood, B., 1985, Ethics and human action in early Stoicism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome, Oxford: Oxford University Press: [1] “Seneca in his Philosophical Milieu,” 7–22; [3] “Politics and Paradox in Seneca’s De Beneficiis,” 65–94; [4] “Rules and Reasoning in Stoic Ethics,” 95–131; [5] “The Will in Seneca,” 132–156; [6] “God and Human Knowledge in Seneca’s Natural Questions,” 157–200; [7] “Moral Judgement in Seneca,” 201–223; [8] “Natural Law in Seneca,” 224–248; [10] “Getting to Goodness,” 271–301; [12] “Seneca and Self-assertion,” 322-352. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007a, “Seneca, Plato and Platonism: the case of Letter 65,” in Platonic Stoicism and Stoic Platonism, Mauro Bonazzi and Christoph Helmig (eds.), Leuven: Leuven University Press, 149–167. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007b, “The Importance of Form in the Letters of Seneca the Younger,” in Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography, Ruth Morello and Andrew Morrison (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 133–148. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, Ethics After Aristotle, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Irwin, T.H., 1992, “Who discovered the Will?”, in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Ethics (Philosophical Perspectives: Volume 6), Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 453–473. (Scholar)
• Kahn, C.H., 1988, “Discovering the Will”, in J. M. Dillon and A. A. Long (eds.), The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, Berkeley: University of California Press, 234–259. (Scholar)
• Kamtekar, R., 2005, “Good Feelings and Motivation: Comments on John Cooper ’The Emotional Life of the Wise’,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43: 219–229. (Scholar)
• Ker, J., 2006, “Seneca, Man of Many Genres,” in Volk and Williams (2006) 19–41. (Scholar)
• Kidd, I., 1978, “Moral Actions and Rules in Stoicism,” in J. Rist (ed.), The Stoics, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 247–258. (Scholar)
• Konstan, D., 2015, “Senecan Emotions,” in Bartsch and Schiesaro (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Seneca, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 174–184. (Scholar)
• Laurant, V., E. Malaspina, and F. Prost (eds.), 2021, Lectures plurielles du «De ira» de Sénèque: Interprétations, contextes, enjeux (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde: Volume 399), Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
• Leach, E. W., 2008, “The Implied Reader and the Political Argument in Seneca;s Apocolocyntosis and De clementia,” in J. G. Fitch (ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Seneca, New York: Oxford University Press, 264–298. (Scholar)
• Long, A.A., 2003, “Roman philosophy,” in D. Sedley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 184–210. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Seneca on the self: why now?,” in A. A. Long, From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 360–376. (Scholar)
• Machek, D., 2015, “Emotions that Do Not Move: Zhuangzi and Stoics on Self-Emerging Feelings,” Dao, 14: 521–544. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “Did Seneca accede to metriopatheia?” Ancient Philosophy, 38(2): 383–407. (Scholar)
• Mann, W.-R., 2006, “Learning How to Die”, in Volk and Williams (2006), 103–122. (Scholar)
• Manning, C.E., 1981, On Seneca’s “Ad Marciam”, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Maurach, G., 2000, Seneca. Leben und Werk, third edition, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Scholar)
• Maso, S., 2018, “Seneca e la Passione come Esperienza Fisica,” Elenchos, 39: 377–401. (Scholar)
• Mitsis, P., 2001, “The Stoic Origin of Natural Rights,” in K. Ierodiakonou, Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 153–177. (Scholar)
• Müller, J., 2014. “Did Seneca Understand Medea? A Contribution to the Stoic Account of Akrasia,” in Colish and Wildberger (eds.), Seneca Philosophus, Berlin: De Gruyter: 65–94. (Scholar)
• Németh, A., 2022, “The Metaphors of Conscientia in Seneca’s Epistles,” Mnemosyne, 1: 1–29. (Scholar)
• –––, 2023, “Seneca and the Narrative Self,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 31: 845–865. (Scholar)
• Nussbaum, M.C., 1994, The therapy of desire: theory and practice in Hellenistic ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Pineros-Glasscock, A., 2022, “Giving Gifts and Making Friends: Seneca’s De beneficiis on how to expand one’s sphere of ethical concern” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 62: 261–292. (Scholar)
• Reydam-Schils, G., 2010, “Seneca’s Platonism: The soul and its divine origin,” in A.W. Nightingale and D. Sedley (eds.), Ancient Models of the Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 196–215. (Scholar)
• Riggsby, A.M., 2015, “Tyrants, Fire, and Dangerous Things,” in Williams and Volk (eds.), Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 111–128. (Scholar)
• Rist, J., 1969, Stoic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Röttig, S., 2021, “Philosophische Überzeugung und römische Identität. Seneca über den Weisen und die Tugend der ‘pudicitia’,” Gymnasium – Zeitschrift Für Kultur der Antike Und Humanistische Bildung, 128(6): 553–573. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022a, Affekte und Wille. Senecas Ethik und ihre handlungspsychologische Fundierung, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022b, “Being and Becoming Good: Senecas Two Moral Conceptions of ‘Ars’,” in T. Angier and L. Raphals (eds.), Skill in Ancient Ethics The Legacy of China, Greece and Rome, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 185–200. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming, “The Senecan Embodied Self as the Source of Affections and Emotions,” in A. Németh and D. Schmal (eds.), The Self in Ancient and Early Modern Philosophy, London: Bloomsbury Academic. (Scholar)
• Roller, M., 2015, “The Dialogue in Seneca’s Dialogues (and Other Moral Essays),” in S. Bartsch and A. Schiesaro (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Seneca, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 54–67. (Scholar)
• Romm, J.S., 2014, Dying Every Day: Seneca at the Court of Nero, New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (Scholar)
• Rosenmeyer, T.G., 1989, Senecan Drama and Cosmology, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Russell, D.C., 2004, “Virtue as ‘Likeness to God’ in Plato and Seneca,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42: 241–260. (Scholar)
• Schafer, J., 2009, Ars Didactica: Seneca’s 94th and 95th Letters, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Seneca’s Epistulae Morales as Dramatized Education,” Classical Philology, 106(1): 32–52. (Scholar)
• Schiesaro, A., 2003, The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Seneca and the denial of self,” in S. Bartsch and D. Wray (eds.), Seneca and the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 221–236. (Scholar)
• Sedley, D., 2001, “The Stoic-Platonist Debate on kathêkonta,” in K. Ierodiakonou, Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128–152. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Stoic Metaphysics at Rome,” in R. Salles (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 117–142. (Scholar)
• Setaioli, A., 1988, Seneca e I Greci: Citazioni e Traduzioni nelle Opere Filosofiche, Bologna: Patron. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Ethics I: Philosophy as Therapy, Self-Transformation, and ’Lebensform’,” in G. Damschen and A. Heil (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Seneca, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 239–256. (Scholar)
• Shogry, S., forthcoming, “Seneca on Moral Improvement through Dialectical Study: A Chrysippean Reading of Letter 87,” Ancient Philosophy. (Scholar)
• Sorabji, R., 1998, “Chrysippus – Posidonius – Seneca: A High-level Debate on Emotion,” in J. Sihvola and T. Engberg-Pedersen (eds.), The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 149–169. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Star, C., 2012, The Empire of the Self: Self-Command and Political Speech in Seneca and Petronius, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
• Striker, G., 1996, “Origins of the Concept of Natural Law.” Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2 (1987) 79–94; reprinted in Papers in Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 209–220. (Scholar)
• Tieleman, T., 2003, Chrysippus’ On Affections, Reconstruction and Interpretation, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Veyne, P., 2003, Seneca: the life of a Stoic, tr. by David Sullivan, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Voelke, A.-J., 1973, L’idée de volonté dans le stoïcisme, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
• Vogt, K.M., 2006, “Anger, present injustice and future revenge in Seneca’s De Ira,” in Volk and Williams (2006) 57–74. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Duties to Others: Demands and Limits,” in M. Betzler (ed.), Kant’s Doctrine of Virtue, Berlin: de Gruyter, 219–243. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “A Virtue for Madmen? A Discussion of Susanna Braund, Seneca, De Clementia” Ancient Philosophy, 31: 453–459. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, “The Stoic Conception of Law,” Polis, 38(3): 557–572. (Scholar)
• Volk, K., 2006, “Cosmic Disruption in Seneca’s Thyestes: Two Ways of Looking at an Eclipse,” in Volk and Williams (2006), 183–200. (Scholar)
• Volk, K., and G. Williams (eds.), 2006, Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics (Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition: Volume 28), Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Wilcox, A. 2006, “Exemplary Grief: Gender and Virtue in Seneca’s Consolations to Women,” Helios, 33(1): 73–100. (Scholar)
• Wildberger, J., 2006, “Seneca and the Stoic Theory of Cognition. Some Preliminary Remarks”, in Volk and Williams (2006) 75–102. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018a, “Care of the Self and Social Bonding in Seneca: Recruiting Readers for a Global Network of Progressor Friends,” Vita Latina, 197, 117–130. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018b, “Amicitia and Eros: Seneca’s Adaptation of a Stoic Concept of Friendship for Roman Men in Progress,” in Philosophie in Rom – Römische Philosophie? (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde: Volume358), Gernot Michael Müller und Fosca Mariani Zini (eds.), Berlin: De Gruyter, 387–426. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018c, The Stoics and the State, Baden-Baden: Nomos. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, “Seneca and the doxography of ethics,” in M. Garani, A. N. Michalopoulos and S. Papaioannou (eds.), Intertextuality in Seneca’s Philosophical Writings, London and New York: Routledge, 81–104. (Scholar)
• –––, 2023, “Cicero, Panaitios und die Stoa: Pflichten, Impulse und das Ehrenhafte in De officiis 1.7–17,” in P. Brüllmann and J. Müller (eds.), Cicero: De officiis, Berlin: De Gruyter, 51–70. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming-2024, “Women in the Household and Public Sphere: Two Contrasting Stoic Views,” in S. Brill and C. McKeen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Women and Ancient Greek Philosophy, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming, “The kind enslaver and Seneca’s failure to conceive of an ideal at the heart of his philosophy,” in D. Kiesel and C. Kietzmann, Politische Anthropologie in der Antike, Basel: Schwabe Verlag. (Scholar)
• Williams, G., 2005, “Interactions: Physics, Morality, and Narrative in Seneca Natural Questions 1,” Classical Philology, 100: 142–165. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “States of Exile, States of Mind: Paradox and Reversal in Seneca’s Consolatio ad Heluiam Matrem,” in Volk and Williams (2006) 147–174. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Wilson, E.R., 2014, The Greatest Empire: A Life of Seneca, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Wray, D., 2009, “Seneca and tragedy’s reason,” in S. Bartsch and D. Wray (eds.), Seneca and the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 237–254. (Scholar)