Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Computer Simulations in Science" by Eric Winsberg

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Barberousse, A., and P. Ludwig, 2009. “Models as Fictions,” in Fictions in Science. Philosophical Essays in Modeling and Idealizations, London: Routledge, 56–73. (Scholar)
Barberousse, A., and Vorms, M. 2014. “About the warrants of computer-based empirical knowledge,” Synthese, 191(15): 3595–3620. (Scholar)
Bedau, M.A., 2011. “Weak emergence and computer simulation,” in P. Humphreys and C. Imbert (eds.), Models, Simulations, and Representations, New York: Routledge, 91–114. (Scholar)
–––, 1997. “Weak Emergence,” Noûs (Supplement 11), 31: 375–399. (Scholar)
Beisbart, C. and J. Norton, 2012. “Why Monte Carlo Simulations are Inferences and not Experiments,” in International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 26: 403–422. (Scholar)
Beisbart, C., 2017. “Advancing knowledge through computer simulations? A socratic exercise,” in M. Resch, A. Kaminski, & P. Gehring (eds.), The Science and Art of Simulation (Volume I), Cham: Springer, pp. 153–174./ (Scholar)
Burge, T., 1993. “Content preservation,” The Philosophical Review, 102(4): 457–488. (Scholar)
–––, 1998. “Computer proof, apriori knowledge, and other minds: The sixth philosophical perspectives lecture,” Noûs,, 32(S12): 1–37. (Scholar)
Currie, Adrian, 2018. “The argument from surprise,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 48(5): 639–661 (Scholar)
Dardashti, R., Thebault, K., and Winsberg, E., 2015. “Confirmation via analogue simulation: what dumb holes could tell us about gravity,” in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68(1): 55–89 (Scholar)
Dardashti, R., Hartmann, S., Thebault, K., and Winsberg, E., 2019. “Hawking radiation and analogue experiments: A Bayesian analysis,” in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 67: 1–11. (Scholar)
Epstein, J., and R. Axtell, 1996. Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom-up, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Epstein, J., 1999. “Agent-based computational models and generative social science,” Complexity, 4(5): 41–57. (Scholar)
Franklin, A., 1996. The Neglect of Experiment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1989. “The Epistemology of Experiment,” The Uses of Experiment, D. Gooding, T. Pinch and S. Schaffer (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 437–60. (Scholar)
Frigg, R., and J. Reiss, 2009. “The philosophy of simulation: Hot new issues or same old stew,” Synthese, 169: 593–613. (Scholar)
Giere, R. N., 2009. “Is Computer Simulation Changing the Face of Experimentation?,” Philosophical Studies, 143: 59–62 (Scholar)
Gilbert, N., and K. Troitzsch, 1999. Simulation for the Social Scientist, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press. (Scholar)
Grüne-Yanoff, T., 2007. “Bounded Rationality,” Philosophy Compass, 2(3): 534–563. (Scholar)
Grüne-Yanoff, T. and Weirich, P., 2010. “Philosophy of Simulation,” Simulation and Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 41(1): 1–31. (Scholar)
Guala, F., 2002. “Models, Simulations, and Experiments,” Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values, L. Magnani and N. Nersessian (eds.), New York: Kluwer, 59–74. (Scholar)
–––, 2008. “Paradigmatic Experiments: The Ultimatum Game from Testing to Measurement Device,” Philosophy of Science, 75: 658–669. (Scholar)
Hacking, I., 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1988. “On the Stability of the Laboratory Sciences,” The Journal of Philosophy, 85: 507–15. (Scholar)
–––, 1992. “Do Thought Experiments have a Life of Their Own?” PSA (Volume 2), A. Fine, M. Forbes and K. Okruhlik (eds.), East Lansing: The Philosophy of Science Association, 302–10. (Scholar)
Hartmann, S., 1996. “The World as a Process: Simulations in the Natural and Social Sciences,” in R. Hegselmann, et al. (eds.), Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 77–100. (Scholar)
Hubig, C, & Kaminski, A., 2017. “Outlines of a pragmatic theory of truth and error in computer simulation,” in M. Resch, A. Kaminski, & P. Gehring (eds.), The Science and Art of Simulation (Volume I), Cham: Springer, pp. 121–136. (Scholar)
Hughes, R., 1999. “The Ising Model, Computer Simulation, and Universal Physics,” in M. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), Models as Mediators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Huggins, E. M.,and E. A. Schultz, 1967. “San Francisco bay in a warehouse,” Journal of the Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology, 10(5): 9–16. (Scholar)
Humphreys, P., 1990. “Computer Simulation,” in A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels (eds.), PSA 1990 (Volume 2), East Lansing, MI: The Philosophy of Science Association, 497–506. (Scholar)
–––, 1995. “Computational science and scientific method,” in Minds and Machines, 5(1): 499–512. (Scholar)
–––, 2004. Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2009. “The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods,” Synthese, 169: 615–626. (Scholar)
Kaufmann, W. J., and L. L. Smarr, 1993. Supercomputing and the Transformation of Science, New York: Scientific American Library. (Scholar)
Laymon, R., 1985. “Idealizations and the testing of theories by experimentation,” in Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 147–73. (Scholar)
Lenhard, J., 2007. “Computer simulation: The cooperation between experimenting and modeling,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 176–94. (Scholar)
–––, 2019. Calculated Surprises: A Philosophy of Computer Simulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
Lenhard, J. & Küster, U., 2019. Minds & Machines. 29: 19. (Scholar)
Morgan, M., 2003. “Experiments without material intervention: Model experiments, virtual experiments and virtually experiments,” in The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, H. Radder (ed.), Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 216–35. (Scholar)
Morrison, M., 2012. “Models, measurement and computer simulation: The changing face of experimentation,” Philosophical Studies, 143: 33–57. (Scholar)
Norton, S., and F. Suppe, 2001. “Why atmospheric modeling is good science,” in Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, C. Miller and P. Edwards (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 88–133. (Scholar)
Oberkampf, W. and C. Roy, 2010. Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Oreskes, N., with K. Shrader-Frechette and K. Belitz, 1994. “Verification, Validation and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences,” Science, 263(5147): 641–646. (Scholar)
Parke, E., 2014. “Experiments, Simulations, and Epistemic Privilege,” Philosophy of Science, 81(4): 516–36. (Scholar)
Parker, W., 2008a. “Franklin, Holmes and the Epistemology of Computer Simulation,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22(2): 165–83. (Scholar)
–––, 2008b. “Computer Simulation through an Error-Statistical Lens,” Synthese, 163(3): 371–84. (Scholar)
–––, 2009a. “Does Matter Really Matter? Computer Simulations, Experiments and Materiality,” Synthese, 169(3): 483–96. (Scholar)
–––, 2013. “Computer Simulation,” in S. Psillos and M. Curd (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, 2nd Edition, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 2017. “Computer Simulation, Measurement, and Data Assimilation,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68(1): 273–304. (Scholar)
Peschard, I., 2010. “Modeling and Experimenting,” in P. Humphreys and C. Imbert (eds), Models, Simulations, and Representations, London: Routledge, 42–61. (Scholar)
Primiero, G., 2019. “A Minimalist Epistemology for Agent-Based Simulations in the Artificial Sciences,” Minds and Machines, 29(1): 127–148. (Scholar)
Purves, G.M., forthcoming. “Finding truth in fictions: identifying non-fictions in imaginary cracks,” Synthese. (Scholar)
Resch, M. M., Kaminski, A., & Gehring, P. (eds.), 2017. The science and art of simulation I: Exploring-understanding-knowing, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
Roush, S., 2015. “The epistemic superiority of experiment to simulation,” Synthese, 169: 1–24. (Scholar)
Roy, S., 2005. “Recent advances in numerical methods for fluid dynamics and heat transfer,” Journal of Fluid Engineering, 127(4): 629–30. (Scholar)
Ruphy, S., 2015. “Computer simulations: A new mode of scientific inquiry?” in S. O. Hansen (ed.), The Role of Technology in Science: Philosophical Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 131–149 (Scholar)
Schelling, T. C., 1971. “Dynamic Models of Segregation,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1: 143–186. (Scholar)
Simon, H., 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial, Boston, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Symons, J., & Alvarado, R., 2019. “Epistemic Entitlements and the Practice of Computer Simulation,” Minds and Machines, 29(1): 37–60. (Scholar)
Toon, A., 2010. “Novel Approaches to Models,” Metascience, 19(2): 285–288. (Scholar)
Trenholme R., 1994. “Analog Simulation,” Philosophy of Science, 61: 115–131. (Scholar)
Unruh, W. G., 1981. “Experimental black-hole evaporation?” Physical Review Letters, 46(21): 1351–53. (Scholar)
Winsberg, E., 2018. Philosophy and Climate Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
–––, 2010. Science in the Age of Computer Simulation, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2009a. “A Tale of Two Methods,” Synthese, 169(3): 575–92 (Scholar)
–––, 2009b. “Computer Simulation and the Philosophy of Science,” Philosophy Compass, 4/5: 835–845. (Scholar)
–––, 2009c. “A Function for Fictions: Expanding the scope of science,” in Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, M. Suarez (ed.), London: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 2006. “Handshaking Your Way to the Top: Inconsistency and falsification in intertheoretic reduction,” Philosophy of Science, 73: 582–594. (Scholar)
–––, 2003. “Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World,” Philosophy of Science, 70: 105–125. (Scholar)
–––, 2001. “Simulations, Models, and Theories: Complex Physical Systems and their Representations,” Philosophy of Science, 68: S442–S454. (Scholar)
–––, 1999. “Sanctioning Models: The Epistemology of Simulation,” Science in Context, 12(3): 275–92. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Sep 25 06:53:12 2023

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...