Primary Sources

• Albert of Saxony. Quaestiones in artem veterem, ed. A. Munoz Garcia, Maracaibo, 1988.
• Anonymous. Grammatica porretana, ed. Karin M. Fredborg, C. H. Kneepkens, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge grec et latin, 57, 1988, pp. 11–67. (Scholar)
• Anonymous. Summa ‘Absoluta cuiuslbet’, in C. H. Kneepkens, Het Iudicium Constructionis, Petrus Hispanus’ Summa ‘Absoluta cuiuslibet’, Nijmegen, 1987. (Scholar)
• Anonymous, Summule antiquorum, in L. M. de Rijk, “On the genuine text of Peter of Spain’s Summule Logicales I, Summule Antiquorum”, Vivarium VI, 1968, pp. 1–34. (Scholar)
• Boethius. In Categorias Aristotelis Libri Quatuor, Patrologie Latine LXIV, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris: Garnier, 1860.
• Boethius. In Isagogen Porphyrii Commenta, editio prima, ed. S. Brandt,Vienna-Leipzig, 1906.
• Boethius. Commentarii in Librum Aristotelis Peri hermeneias, editio secunda, ed. Karl Meiser, Leipzig: Teubner, 1880.
• Boethius of Dacia. Boethii Daci Aliarumque Sophismata, ed. Sten Ebbesen, Irène Rosier-Catach, Hauniae, 2021.
• Boethius of Dacia, Modi significandi sive Quaestiones super Priscianum maiorem, Corpus philosophorum danicorum medii aevi IV/1, ed. Jan Pinborg, Heinrich Roos, Hauniae: G.E.C. Gad, 1969.
• Domingo de Soto. Summulae, Salamanca: 1554–55; rpr. Hildesheim-New York: Georg Olms, 1980.
• Donatus, Ars Maior, in Louis Holtz, Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical, étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IV^e-IX^e siècles), Paris: CNRS éditions: 1981.
• John Buridan. Kommentar zur Aristotelischen Metaphysik. Paris: 1588 [actually 1518]; reprinted as In Metaphysicen Aristotelis Quaestiones, Frankfurt a. M.: Minerva, 1964. (Scholar)
• John Buridan. Kommentar zur Aristotelischen Physik, Paris: 1509; reprinted as Questiones super octo physicorum libros Aristotelis, Frankfurt a. M.: Minerva, 1964. (Scholar)
• John Buridan, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis, secundum ultimam lecturam, Libri I-II, ed. M. Streijger et Paul J. J. M. Bakker, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2015.
• John Buridan, Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima, ed. & tr. Gyula Klima, Peter Hartman, Peter Sobol, and Jack Zupko, Historical-Analytical Studies on Mind, Nature, and Action 9, Cham: Springer, 2023. (Scholar)
• John Buridan. Summulae de Dialectica, tr. Gyula Klima, New Haven-London: Yale University Press, 2001.
• John Buridan, Summule in praedicamenta, ed. Egbert Peter Bos, Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1994.
• John Buridan, Summule de suppositionibus, ed. Ria van der Lecq, Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1998.
• John Buridan, Summule de propositionibus, ed. Ria van der Lecq, Turnhout: Brepols, 2005.
• John Buridan, Summule de demonstrationibus, ed. L. M. de Rijk, Turnhout: Brepols, 2001.
• John Buridan, Summule de praedicabilibus, ed. L. M. de Rijk, Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1995.
• John Buridan, Quaestiones in Porphyrii, ed. R. Tartarzynski, in Przeglad Tomistyczny 2 (1986): 111–195.
• John Buridan, Quaestiones in predicamenta, ed. J. Schneider, München: Verlag der Bayerich Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1983.
• John of Dacia, Summa grammatica, Opera Omnia, Corpus philosophorum danicorum medii aevi I/1, ed. A. Otto, Hauniae: G.E.C. Gad, 1955.
• John Dorp, [Commentary on] Johannes Buridanus, Compendium Totius Logicae, Venice 1499; rpr. Frankfurt a. M.: Minerva, 1965.
• Lambert of Lagny (or Auxerre). Logica (Summa Lamberti), Franco Alessio (ed.), Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 1971; English transl. T. S. Maloney, Logica or Summa Lamberti, Notre Dame, NI: Notre Dame Unversty Press, 2015. (Scholar)
• Martin of Dacia, Modi significandi, Opera omnia, Corpus philosophorum danicorum medii aevi, ed. H. Roos, Hauniae: G.E.C. Gad, 1961.
• Michael of Marbais, Summa de modis significandi, ed. L. G. Kelly, Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1995.
• Nicholas of Amsterdam. Commentary on the Old Logic, ed. Egbert Peter Bos, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016.
• Paul of Venice. Logica Magna (Part I, Fascicule I) (Tractatus de Terminis), ed. & tr. Norman Kretzmann, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1979.
• Peter Abelard. Glossae super Porphyrium; Glossae super Predicamenta; Logica Ingredientibus, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters, Bd. XXI, heft 1, ed. B. Geyer, Münster: Aschendorff, 1919–1923.
• Peter Abelard. Dialectica, ed. L. M. de Rijk, Assen: Van Gorcum, 1956.
• Peter Helias. Summa super Priscianum, ed. Leo G. Reilly, 2 volumes, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1993.
• Porphyry. Isagoge in Aristoteles Latinus. I. 6–7. Categoriarum supplementa, ed. Lorenzo Minio-Paluello, adj. Bernard G. Dod, Leiden: Desclée de Brouwer, 1966.
• Peter of Spain, Tractatus, ed. L. M. de Rijk, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1972.
• Peter of Spain, Syncategoremata, ed. L. M. de Rijk, Leiden-New York-Köln: Brill, 1992.
• Priscian. Institutionum grammaticarum libri XVIII, ed. M. Hertz, in Grammatici Latini, vols. 2 and 3, Leipzig: Teubner, 1855; rpr. Hildesheim-New York: Georg Olms, 1981.
• Robert Kilwardby, Notule Libri Priorum, ed. & tr. Paul Thom and John Scott, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
• Robert Kilwardby, Notulae super Porphyrium, provisional edition by Alessandro Conti, unpublished.
• Roger Bacon. Compendium of the Study of Theology, ed. & tr. Thomas S. Maloney, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1988.
• Roger Bacon, Des Signes, ed. & tr. I. Rosier-Catach, L. Cesalli, F. Goubier, and A. de Libera, Paris, Vrin, 2022.
• Simon of Faversham (ascr.), Commentary on the Tractatus, in L. M. de Rijk, “On the Genuine Text of Peter of Spain’s Summule Logicales II: Simon of Faversham (d. 1306) as a Commentator on Tracts I-V of the Summule”, Vivarium VI/2, Leiden: Brill, 1968: 69–101. (Scholar)
• Thomas of Erfurt. Grammatica Speculativa, ed. & tr. Geoffrey L. Bursill-Hall, London: Longmans, 1972.
• Thuo of Viborg, Disputata metaphysicae, Thuonis de Vibergia Opera, ed. Andrea Tabarroni and Sten Ebbesen, Hauniae: C. A. Reitzel, 1998.
• William of Ockham. Summa Logicae, ed. Philotheus Boehner, Gedeon Gál, and Stephen Brown, Opera Philosophica I, St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 1974.
• William of Sherwood. Introductiones in Logicam, ed. & (German) tr. Hartmut Brands and Christoph Kann, Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1995.
• William of Conches, Glossae super Platonem, ed. Édouard Jeauneau, Turnhout: Brepols, 2006.

Secondary Sources

• Ashworth, E. J., 1970, “Some Notes on Syllogistics in the Sixteenth and Sevententh Centuries,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, XI(1): 17–31. (Scholar)
• –––, 1974, Language and Logic in the Post-medieval Period, Dordrecht, Reidel. (Scholar)
• –––, 1982 [1985], “The Structure of Mental Language: Some Problems Discussed by Early Sixteenth Century Logicians,” Vivarium, 20: 59–83; reprinted in E.J. Ashworth, Studies in Post-Medieval Semantics, London: Variorum Reprints, 1985. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “L’équivocité, l’univocité et les noms propres,” in Joël Biard and Irène Rosier (eds.), La tradition médiévale des Catégories — XIIe–XIVe siècles, Louvain: Peeters, pp. 127–40.
• –––, 2004a, “Singular Terms and Singular Concepts: From Buridan to the Early Sixteenth Century,” in Sten Ebbesen and Russell L. Friedman (eds.), John Buridan and Beyond: Topics in the Language Sciences, 1300–1700, Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Science and Letters, pp. 121–51. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004b, “Singular Terms and Predication in Some Late Fifteenth and Sixteenth Century Thomistic Logicians,” in Alfonso Maierù and Luisa Valente (eds.), Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non-Assertive Language, Firenze: Olschki, pp. 517–36. (Scholar)
• Boehner, Philotheus, 1944, “The Medieval Crisis of Logic and the Author of the ‘Centiloquium’ Attributed to Occam”, Franciscan Studies, 4(2): 151–170. (Scholar)
• Bakker, Paul J. J. M., 1997, “Hoc est corpus meum, L’analyse de la formule de consécration chez les théologiens du XIVe et XVe siècles,” in Costantino Marmo (ed.), Vestigia, Imagines, Verba: Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts (XIIth-XIVth Centuries), Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 427–51. (Scholar)
• Bararin, Marc, 1989. La naissance de la Syntaxe à Rome, Paris. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “À propos du nom propre dans l’Antiquité: quelques points qui ont fait débat”, Corpus, 50, pp. 229–237.
• Black, Deborah, 2011, “Avicenna’s ‘Vague Individuals’ and its Impact on Medieval Latin Philosophy”, in Robert Wisnovsky, Faith Wallis, Jamie Fumo, and Carlos Fraenkel (eds.), Vehicles of Transmission, Translation, and Transformation in Medieval Textual Culture, Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 259–292 (Scholar)
• Bos, Egbert, 1999, “Thuo of Viborg and Marsilius of Inghen”, in Sten Ebbesen and Russell L. Friedman (eds.), Medieval Analyses on Language and Cognition, Copenhagen, pp. 323–340. (Scholar)
• Brumberg-Chaumont, Julie, 2005, “La nomination du singulier dans les Quaestiones super Metaphysicam, de Geoffroy d’Aspall,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 72: 47–103. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Sémantiques du nom propre: sources anciennes et discussions médiévales à l’époque d’Abélard,” Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 29: 137–166.
• –––, 2007 [2011], “Les sens de ‘Substance’ chez Apollonius Dyscole”, Lettras Classicas, 11: 11–50. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “La signification de la substance chez Priscien et Pierre Hélie”, in Louis Holtz, Marc Baratin, Bernard Colombat (eds.), Priscien: Transmission et refondation de la grammaire de l’Antiquité aux Modernes, Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 503–519. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Grammaire et logique du nom dans les Gloses sur Priscien de Guillaume de Conches”, in Barbara Obrist and Irene Caiazzo (eds.), Guillaume de Conches: philosophie et science au XIIe siècle, Firenze: Sismel, pp. 377–465. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013a. “The Logical and Grammatical Contribution to the Reflection on Individuality in Late Antiquity”, in Johannes Zachhuber and Alexis Torrens eds.), Individuality in Late Antiquity, Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 63–90. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013b. “The Role of Discrete Terms in the Theory of the Properties of Terms,” Vivarium, 51: 169–204. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “Jean Buridan et le problème des termes singuliers substantiels”, Documenti e Studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, XXVII: 411–451. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming-a, “Sophismatically Thinking about consequences from universal to singular propositions. A case study from the sophisma OMNIS HOMO DE NECESSITATE EST ANIMA”, in Alain de Libera, Frédéric Goubier, and Laurent Cesalli (eds.), Sophismata: histoire d’une pratique philosophique, Schwabe. [Preprint of Brumberg-Chaumont forthcoming-a available online (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming-b, “Logiques du nom propres, de l’Antiquité au Moyen Âge”, in Bernard Bosredon, Georges Kleiber, and Irene Tamba (eds.), Nomination, référence et signification à l’épreuve du nom propre, London: Iste Editions. (Scholar)
• Brunschwig, Jacques, 1984, “Remarques sur la théorie Stoïcienne du nom propre,” Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 6: 3–19. (Scholar)
• Chiaradonna, Riccardo, 2000. “La teoria dell’individuo in Porfirio e l’IDIÔS POION stoico”, Elenchos, XXI(2): 303–331. (Scholar)
• Dutilh-Novaes, Catarina, 2012. “A Medieval Solution to the Problem of Empty Names,” in Catarina Dutilh-Novaes and Ole Thomassen Hjortland (eds.), Insolubles and Consequences, Essays in Honour of Stephen Read, London: College Publications, pp. 73–92. (Scholar)
• Ebbesen, Sten, 1987, “Talking about what is no more. Texts by Peter of Cornwall(?), Richard of Clive, Simon of Faversham, and Radulphus Brito. A Supplement to CIMAGL 3,” Cahiers de l’institut du moyen-âge grec et latin, 55: 135–68. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, “Words and Signification in the 13th Century Questions on Aristotle’s Metaphysics”, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin, 70: 74–114. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013,“Early supposition theory II”, Vivarium, 51(1–4): 60–78. (Scholar)
• Ebbesen, Sten, and Pinborg, Jan, 1984, “Thirteenth century notes on William of Sherwood’s Treatise on Properties of Terms, an edition of Anonymi Dubitationes et Notabilia circa Guilelmi de Shyreswode Introductionum Logicalium Tractatum V from Ms. Worcester Cath. Q. 13,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge Grec et Latin, 47: 104–141 (Scholar)
• Ebbesen, Sten, Goubier, Frédéric, 2010, A Catalogue of Thirteenth Century Sophismata, vols. I et II, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
• Fredborg, Karin Margareta, 1973, “The Dependence of Petrus Helias’ Summa super Priscianum on William of Conches’ Glose super Priscianum,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge Grec et Latin, 11: 1–57. (Scholar)
• –––, 1988, “Speculative Grammar,” in Peter Dronke (ed.), A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–195. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “William of Conches and His Grammar,” in Barabra Obrist and Irene Caiazzo (eds.), Guillaume de Conches: philosophie et science au XIIe siècle, Firenze: Sismel, pp. 329–376. (Scholar)
• Gazziero, Leone, Libera, Alain de, 2008, “Le sophisma ‘Omnis homo de necessitate est animal’ du codex Parisinus 16135, f. 99rb-103vb”, Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 75: 323–368. (Scholar)
• Gelber, Hester G., 2004, It Could Have Been Otherwise, Contingency and Necessity in the Dominican Theology at Oxford, 1300–1350, Leiden/Boston: Brill. (Scholar)
• –––, 1974, Logic and the Trinity. A Clash of Value in Scholastic Thought, 1300–1300, Ph.D. Thesis, Madison, University of Wisconsin. (Scholar)
• Goubier, Frédéric, Rosier-Catach, Irène, 2019, “The Trivium in the 12th century”, in Cédric Giraud (ed.), Les écoles du XIIe siècle, Leiden: Brill, pp. 141–179. (Scholar)
• Gourinat, Jean-Baptiste, 2000, La dialectique des Stoïciens, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
• Gracia, Jorge J. E., 1984, Introduction to the Problem of Individuation in the Early Middle Ages, Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press. (Scholar)
• Grondeux, Anne, and Rosier-Catach, Irène, 2017, Priscien lu par Guillaume de Champeaux et son école: Les Notae Dunelmenses (Durham, D. C. L., C.IV.29), Turnhout: Brepols. (Scholar)
• Holtz, Louis, et al., 2009, Priscien: Transmission et refondation de la grammaire de l’Antiquité aux Modernes, Turnhout: Brepols. (Scholar)
• Kalligas, Peter, 2002, “Basil of Caesarea on Proper Names”, in Katerina Ierodiakonou (ed.), Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources, Oxford: Clrendon Press, pp. 31–48 (Scholar)
• King, Peter, 1994, “Buridan on Individuation”, in Jorge E. Gracia (ed.), Individuation in Scholasticism, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 397–430. (Scholar)
• ––– 2001, “John Buridan’s Solution to the Problem of Universals,” in J. M. M. H. Thijssen and Jack Zupko (eds.), The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan, Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill, pp. 1–28. (Scholar)
• Klima, Gyula, 2009, John Buridan, Great Medieval Thinkers, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “The Medieval Problem of Singulars”, in Gyula Klima and Alexander Hall (eds.), The Demonic Temptations of Medieval Nominalism, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 57–80 (Scholar)
• Knuuttila, Simo, 1993, “Trinitarian Sophisms in Robert Holcot’s Theology,” in Stephen Read (ed.), Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 348–56. (Scholar)
• Libera, Alain de, 1991a, “Roger Bacon et la référence vide: sur quelques antécédents médiévaux du paradoxe de Meinong,” in Jean Jolivet, Zenon Kaluza, and Alain de Libera (eds.), Lectionum Varietates: Hommage à Paul Vignaux (1904–1987), Paris: J. Vrin, pp. 85–120. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991b, César et le Phénix. Distinctiones et Sophismata Parisiens du XIIIe Siècle, Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Référence et modalité selon l’Anonymus Erfordiensis Q 328 (pseudo-Robert Kilwardby)”, Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 69: 201–237.
• –––, 2009, “Faire de nécessité loi, Théories de la modalité dans le sophisma ‘Omnis homo de necessitate est animal’ du codex Parisinus 16135, F° 11rb-12rb”, Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 76: 179–233. (Scholar)
• Libera, Alain de, Rosier-Catach, Irène, 1997, “L’analyse scotiste de la formule de la consécration eucharistique,” in Costantino Marmo (ed.), Vestigia, Imagines, Verba: Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts XIIth-XIVth Century, Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 171–201.
• Maierù, Alfonso, 1988, “Logic and Trinitarian Theology: De Modo Predicandi ac Sylogizandi in Divinis,” in Norman Kretzmann (ed.), Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy (Synthese Historical Library, 32), Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 247–95. (Scholar)
• Marmo, Costantino, 1994, La semiotica dei modisti, Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medioevo. (Scholar)
• Miller, Richard H., 1985, “Buridan on Singular Concepts”, Franciscan Studies, 45: 57–72. (Scholar)
• Mora-Márquez, Ana Maria, 2019,“Singular Intellection in Medieval Commentaries on Arstotle’s De anima”, Vivarium, 57: 293–316. (Scholar)
• Perreiah, Alan R., 1972, “Buridan and the Definite Description,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 10: 153–60. (Scholar)
• Panaccio, Claude, 2006 [2017], “Subordination et singularité, la théorie ockhamiste des propositions singulières”, Cahiers d’Épistémologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Cahier num. 269; reprinted in M. Pécharman, Ph. De Roulhan (eds.), Le Philosophe et le langage, Paris: Vrin, 2017, pp. 75–98. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, “Occam et les Démonstratifs”, in E. F. Konrad Koerner et al. (eds.), Studies in the History of Linguistics Dedicated to Geoffrey L. Bursill-Hall (Volume 26), Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V., pp. 189–200. (Scholar)
• Pécharman, Martine, forthcoming, “De la catégorie grammaticale à la catégorie logique: quelle sémantique pour le nom propre à Port-Royal?”, in Bernard Bosredon, George Kleiber, Irene Tamba (eds.), Nomination, référence et signification à l’épreuve du nom propre, London: Iste Editions. (Scholar)
• Pluta, Olaf, 2001, “Buridan’s Theory of Identity,” in J. M. M. H. Thijssen and Jack Zupko (eds.), The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan, Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill, pp. 49–64. (Scholar)
• Reina, Elena Maria, 2002, Hoc hic et nunc, Buridano, Marsilo di Inghen e la conoscenza del singolare, Firenze: Leo S. Olschki. (Scholar)
• Rijk, L. M. de, 1967, Logica modernorum, Volume II, Assen: Van Gorcum. (Scholar)
• Robertson, David G., 2002, “A patristic theory of proper names”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 84: 1–19.
• Rosier-Catach, Irène, 1983, La grammaire spéculative des modistes, Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Signes et sacraments: Thomas d’Aquin et la grammaire spéculative,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 74: 392–36. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, La Parole Efficace. Signe, rituel, Sacré, Paris: Seuil. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Le Glosule super Priscianum: sémantique et universaux”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, XIX: 123–177. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, Arts du Langage et théologie aux confins des XIe et XIIe siècles, Turnhout: Brepols. (Scholar)
• Van der Lecq, Ria, 1993, “Confused Individuals and Moving Trees — John Buridan on the Knowledge of Particulars”, in Egbert P. Bos (ed.), John Buridan A Master of Arts, Nijmengen: Ingenium Publishers, pp. 1–21. (Scholar)