Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Situations in Natural Language Semantics" by Angelika Kratzer

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

References mentioned in the text

References not mentioned in the text

Additional suggestions are most welcome.

  • Alonso-Ovalle, L., 2002, “Aspect and Situations: a Situation Semantics Account of the Semantic Variability of Spanish al-clauses,” From Words to Discourse. Trends in Spanish Semantics and Pragmatics, J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 119-27. (Scholar)
  • Asher, N. & Bonevac, D., 1985, “Situations and Events,” Philosophical Studies, 47: 57–77. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987, “Determiners and Resource Situations,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 10: 567–96. (Scholar)
  • Barwise, J., 1991, “Situationen und kleine Welten,” Semantik/Semantics, A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 80–89. (Scholar)
  • Barwise, J. & Perry, J., 1981a, “Situations and Attitudes,” The Journal of Philosophy, 78: 668–91. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981b, “Semantic Innocence and Uncompromising Situations,” Midwest Studies in the Philosophy of Language VI, P. French, T. Uehling, & H. Wettstein (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 387–403. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985, “Shifting Situations and Shaken Attitudes,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 8: 105–61. (Scholar)
  • Barwise, J. & Cooper, R., 1993, “Extended Kamp Notation: A Graphical Notation for Situation Theory,” Situation Theory and its Applications. Volume 3, P. Aczel, D. Israel, Y. Katagiri & S. Peters (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 29–53. (Scholar)
  • Büring, D., 2004, “Crossover Situations,” Natural Language Semantics, 12: 23–62. (Scholar)
  • Cooper, R., 1986, “Tense and Discourse Location in Situation Semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 9: 17–36. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987a, “Preliminaries to the Treatment of Generalized Quantifiers in Situation Semantics,” Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 73–91. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987b, “Meaning Representation in Montague Grammar and Situation Semantics,” Computational Intelligence, 3: 35–44. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1988, “Facts in Situation Theory: Representation, Psychology or Reality?,” Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, R. Kempson (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49–61. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1990, “Information in the Early Stages of Language Acquisition,” Situation Theory and its Applications, Volume 1, R. Cooper, K. Mukai & J. Perry (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 343–54. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, “A Working Person’s Guide to Situation Theory,” Topics in Semantic Interpretation, S. L. Hansen & F. Soerensen (eds.), Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993, “Generalized Quantifiers and Resource Situations,” Situation Theory and its Applications, Volume 3, P. Aczel, D. Israel, Y. Katagiri & S. Peters (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996, “The Attitudes in Discourse Representation Theory and Situation Semantics,” Logic, Language, and Computation, Volume 1, J. Seligman & D. Westerståhl (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 137–50. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Using Situations to Reason about Speech Events,” Computing Meaning, Volume 1, H. Bunt & R. Muskens (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
  • Cooper, R. & Kamp, H., 1991, “Negation in Situation Semantics and Discourse Representation Theory,” Situation Theory and its Applications, Volume II, J. Barwise, M. Gawron, G. Plotkin and S. Tutiya (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 311–33. (Scholar)
  • Cooper, R. & Barwise, J., 1993, “Extended Kamp Notation: a Graphical Notation for Situation Theory,” Situation Theory and Its Applications 3, P. Aczel, D. Israel, Y. Katagiri & S. Peters (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Cooper, R. & Ginzburg, J., 1996, “A Compositional Situation Semantics for Attitude Reports,” Logic, Language, and Computation, Volume 1, J. Seligman & D. Westerståhl (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 151–65. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Clarification, Ellipsis, and the Nature of Contextual Updates in Dialogue,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 27: 297–365. (Scholar)
  • Cresswell, M., 1991, “Die Weltsituation,” Semantik/Semantics, A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.), Berlin: de Gruyter, 71–80. (Scholar)
  • Doron, E., 1990, “Situation semantics and free indirect discourse with examples from contemporary Hebrew fiction,” Hebrew Linguistics, 28: 21–29. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991, “Point of View as a Factor of Content,” Proceedings of SALT 1, S. Moore & A. Z. Wyner (eds.), Ithaca: CLC Publications, 51–64. (Scholar)
  • Elbourne, P., 2001, “E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion,” Natural Language Semantics, 9: 241–88. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009, “Bishop Sentences and Donkey Cataphora: A Response to Barker and Shan,” Semantics & Pragmatics, 2: 1–7. (Scholar)
  • Engdahl, E., 1990, “Argument Roles and Anaphora,” Situation Theory and its Applications, Volume 1, R. Cooper, K. Mukai & J. Perry (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 379–93. (Scholar)
  • Fox, D. & Sauerland, U., 1997, “Illusive Wide Scope of Universal Quantifiers,” Interfaces in Linguistic Theory, G. Matos, et al. (eds.), Lisbon: Edições Colibri/Associação Portuguesa de Linguistica, 149–76. (Scholar)
  • Gawron, J. M., 1986, “Situations and Prepositions,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 9: 327–82. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996, “Quantificational domains,” The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, S. Lappin (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 247–67. (Scholar)
  • Gawron, J. M. & Peters, S., 1990a, “Some Puzzles About Pronouns,” Situation Theory and its Applications, Volume 1, R. Cooper, K. Mukai & J. Perry (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 395–431. (Scholar)
  • Gawron, J. M., Nerbonne, J. & Peters, S., 1991, “The Absorption Principle and E-Type Anaphora,” Situation Theory and its Applications, volume 2, J. Barwise, J. M. Gawron, G. Plotkin & S. Tutiya (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 335–62. (Scholar)
  • Ginzburg, J., 1991, “Questions without Answers, Wh-Phrases without Scope: A Semantics for Direct Wh-Questions and their Responses,” Situation Theory and its Applications, volume 2, J. M. Gawron, G. Plotkin & S. Tutiya (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 363–404. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996a, “Dynamics and the Semantics of Dialogue,” Logic, Language and Computation, volume 1, J. Seligman and D. Westerståhl (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 221–37. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996b, “The Semantics of Interrogatives,” Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, S. Lappin (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, 385–22. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, “Situation Semantics and the Ontology of Natural Language,” in Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (Volume 1), C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (eds.), Berlin: de Gruyter, 830–51. (Scholar)
  • Glasbey, S., 1996a, “Towards a Channel-Theoretic Account of the Progressive,” Logic, Language and Computation, volume 1, J. Seligman & D. Westerståhl (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 239–54. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996b, “The Progressive: a Channel-Theoretic Analysis,” Journal of Semantics, 13: 331–361.  (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “A Situation-Theoretic Interpretation of Bare Plurals,” The Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language and Computation: Selected Papers, J. Ginzburg, Z. Khasidashvili, C. Vogel, J-J. Levy, & E. Vallduví (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 35–54. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Bare plurals, situations, and discourse context,” Logic, Language and Computation, volume 2, L. Moss, J. Ginzburg & M. de Rijke (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 85–105. (Scholar)
  • Hallman, P., 2009, “Proportions in time: interactions of quantification and aspect,” Natural Language Semantics, 17: 29–61. (Scholar)
  • Hinrichs, E., 1983, “The Semantics of the English Progressive: a Study in Situation Semantics,” Proceedings of the 19th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, in J. Richardson et al. (eds.), Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 171–182. (Scholar)
  • Hinterwimmer, S., 2008, Q-Adverbs as Selective Binders: The Quantificational Variability of Free Relatives and Definite DPs, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Hinterwimmer, S. & Ebert, C., 2010, “Quantificational Variability Effects with Plural Definites: Quantification over Individuals or Situations?,” Journal of Semantics, 27: 139–176. (Scholar)
  • Hornstein, N., 1986, “Review of Situations and Attitudes,” The Journal of Philosophy, 83: 168–84. (Scholar)
  • Iida, M., 1996, Context and Binding in Japanese. Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Landman, F., 1986, Towards a Theory of Information: The Status of Partial Objects in Semantics. Dordrecht: Foris. (Scholar)
  • Larson, R. K., 1983, Restrictive Modification: Relative Clauses and Adverbs. University of Wisconsin PhD dissertation. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1988, “Implicit Arguments in Situation Semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 11: 131–68. (Scholar)
  • Lasersohn, P., 1990, “Group Action and Spatio-Temporal Proximity,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 13: 179–206. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995, Plurality, Conjunction and Events. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
  • Mitchell, J., 1986, The Formal Semantics of Point of View, Ph.D. Thesis, Linguistics Department, University of Massachusetts/Amherst, available in PDF preview from ProQuest UMI. (Scholar)
  • Moltmann, F., 1997, Parts and Wholes in Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Part Structures in Situations: The Semantics of Individual and Whole,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 28: 599–641. (Scholar)
  • Muskens, R., 1995, Meaning and Partiality. Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Partee, B., 1985, “Situations, Worlds, and Contexts,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 8: 53–58. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989, “Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts,” Papers from the 25th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, C. Wiltshire, B. Music, & R. Graczyk (eds.), Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 342–365. (Scholar)
  • Perry, J., 1986a, “From Worlds to Situations,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 15: 83–107. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Expanded Edition. Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Contains several essays on situation semantics.) (Scholar)
  • Portner, P., 1997, “The Semantics of Mood, Complementation, and Conversational Force,” Natural Language Semantics, 5: 167–212. (Scholar)
  • Romero, M., 2002, “Quantification over Situation Variables in LTAG: Some Constraints,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Frameworks (TAG+6): 101–14. Università di Venezia. (Scholar)
  • Rooth, M., 1987, “Noun phrase interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics,” Generalized Quantifiers, P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 237–69. (Scholar)
  • Schaffer, J. & Szabo, Z., 2014, “Epistemic Comparativism: a Contextualist Semantics for Knowledge Ascriptions,” Philosophical Studies, 168: 491–543. (Scholar)
  • Schueler, D., 2008, The Syntax and Semantics of Implicit Conditionals: Filling in the Antecedent, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Linguistics, UCLA, Preprint available online. (Scholar)
  • Schwarz, B., 1998, “Reduced Conditionals in German,” Natural Language Semantics, 6: 271–301. (Scholar)
  • Soames, S., 1990, “Lost Innocence,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 8: 59–71. (Scholar)
  • Stalnaker, R., 1986, “Possible Worlds and Situations,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 15: 109–23. (Scholar)
  • Stojnic, U., Stone, M. & Lepore, E., 2013, “Deixis (Even Without Pointing),” Philosophical Perspectives, 27 (Philosophy of Language): 1–24. (Scholar)
  • Wolter, L. K., 2006, That’s That: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Demonstrative Phrases, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California/Santa Cruz. (Scholar)
  • Zalta, E., 1993, “Twenty-Five Basic Theorems in Situation and World Theory,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 22: 385–428. (Scholar)
  • Zucchi, S., 2015, “Events and Situations,” Annual Review of Linguistics, 1: 85–106. (Scholar)
  • Zweig, E., 2006, “When the Donkey lost its fleas: Persistence, Contextual Restriction, and Minimal Situations,” Natural Language Semantics, 14: 283–296. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Nov 20 02:31:58 2017