Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Hole Argument" by John D. Norton

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Bain, Jonathan, 1998, Representations of Spacetime: Formalism and Ontological Commitment, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Einstein Algebras and the Hole Argument,” Philosophy of Science, 70: 1073–1085. (Scholar)
Belot, Gordon, 1995, “Indeterminism and Ontology,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 9: 85–101. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, Whatever is Never and Nowhere is Not: Space, Time and Ontology in Classical and Quantum Gravity Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh. (Scholar)
–––, 1996a, “Why General Relativity Does Need an Interpretation,” Philosophy of Science, 63 (Supplement): S80–S88. (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Fifty Million Elvis Fans Can’t be Wrong,” Noûs, 52: 946–981. (Scholar)
Brighouse, Carolyn, 1994, “Spacetime and Holes,” in D. Hull, M. Forbes and R. M. Burian (eds.), PSA 1994, Volume 1, pp. 117–125. (Scholar)
Butterfield, Jeremy, 1988, “Albert Einstein meets David Lewis,” in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA 1988, Volume 2, pp. 56–64. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, “The Hole Truth,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40: 1–28. (Scholar)
Brading, Katherine and Castellani, Elena (eds.), 2003, Symmetries in Physics:Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 334–345. (Scholar)
Corry, Leo, Renn, Juergen, and Stachel, John, 1997, “Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute,” Science, 278: 1270–73. (Scholar)
Curiel, Erik, 2018, “On the Existence of Spacetime Structure,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69: 447–483. (Scholar)
Earman, John, 1986, “Why Space is not a Substance (At Least Not to First Degree),” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 67: 225–244. (Scholar)
–––, 1986a, A Primer on Determinism, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute Versus Relational Theories of Space and Time, Cambridge, MA: MIT Bradford. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Tracking down gauge: an ode to the constrained Hamiltonian formalism”, in K. Brading and E. Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140–162. (Scholar)
Earman, John and Norton, John D., 1987, “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38: 515–525. (Scholar)
Einstein, Albert, 1916, “The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity,” in H.A. Lorentz et al., The Principle of Relativity, New York: Dover, 1952, pp. 111–164. (Scholar)
Giovanelli, Marco, 2013 “Erich Kretschmann as a proto-logical-empiricist: Adventures and misadventures of the point-coincidence argument,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44: 115–134. (Scholar)
Gryb, Sean and Thébault, Karim P. Y., 2016, “Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’ and the ‘Problem of Time’,” Philosophy of Science, 83: 563–584. (Scholar)
Healey, Richard, 1999, “On the Reality of Gauge Potentials,” Philosophy of Science, 68: 432–55. (Scholar)
Hoefer, Carl and Cartwright, Nancy, 1993, “Substantivalism and the Hole Argument,” in J. Earman et al. (eds.), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Gruenbaum, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press/Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag Konstanz, pp. 23–43. (Scholar)
Hoefer, Carl, 1996, “The Metaphysics of Space-Time Substantivalism,” Journal of Philosophy, 93: 5–27. (Scholar)
Howard, Don and Norton, John D., 1993, “Out of the Labyrinth? Einstein, Hertz and the Goettingen Answer to the Hole Argument,” in John Earman, Michel Janssen, John D. Norton (eds.), The Attraction of Gravitation: New Studies in History of General Relativity Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 30–62. (Scholar)
Iftime, Mihaela and Stachel, John, 2006, “The hole argument for covariant theories,” General Relativity and Gravitation, 38: 1241–1252. (Scholar)
Janssen, Michel, 1999, “Rotation as the Nemesis of Einstein’s ‘Entwurf’ Theory,” in Hubert Goenner et al. (eds.), Einstein Studies: Volume 7. The Expanding Worlds of General Relativity, Boston: Birkhaeuser, pp. 127–157. (Scholar)
Jammer, Max, 1993, Concepts of Space: The History of Theories of Space in Physics, third enlarged edition, New York: Dover, Chapter 6. “Recent Developments.” (Scholar)
Klein, Martin J. et al. (eds.), 1995, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: Volume 4. The Swiss Years: Writing, 1912–1914, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Lusanna, Luca and Pauri, Massimo, 2006 “Explaining Leibniz equivalence as difference of non-inertial appearances: Dis-solution of the Hole Argument and physical individuation of point-events,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37: 692–725 (Scholar)
Liu, Chuang, 1996, “Realism and Spacetime: Of Arguments Against Metaphysical Realism and Manifold Realism,” Philosophia Naturalis, 33: 243–63. (Scholar)
–––, 1996a, “Gauge Invariance, Indeterminism, and Symmetry Breaking,” Philosophy of Science, 63 (Supplement): S71–S80. (Scholar)
Leeds, Stephen, 1995, “Holes and Determinism: Another Look,” Philosophy of Science, 62: 425–437. (Scholar)
Macdonald, Alan, 2001, “Einstein’s Hole Argument,” American Journal of Physics, 69: 223–25 (Scholar)
Maudlin, Tim, 1989, “The Essence of Spacetime,” in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA 1988, Volume 2, pp. 82–91. (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “Substances and Spacetimes: What Aristotle Would have Said to Einstein,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 21: 531–61. (Scholar)
Muller, Fred A., 1995, “Fixing a Hole,” Foundations of Physics Letters, 8: 549–562. (Scholar)
Mundy, Brent, 1992, “Spacetime and Isomorphism,” in D. Hull, M. Forbes and K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA 1992, Volume 1, pp. 515–527. (Scholar)
Norton, John D., 1984, “How Einstein found his Field Equations: 1912–1915,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 14: 253–316; reprinted in Don Howard and John Stachel (eds.), Einstein and the History of General Relativity: Einstein Studies, Volume 1, Boston: Birkhäuser, 1989, pp. 101–159. (Scholar)
–––, 1987, “Einstein, the Hole Argument and the Reality of Space,” in John Forge (ed.), Measurement, Realism and Objectivity, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 153–188 . (Scholar)
–––, 1988, “The Hole Argument,” in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA 1988, Volume 2, pp. 56–64. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, “Coordinates and Covariance: Einstein’s view of spacetime and the modern view,” Foundations of Physics, 19: 1215–1263. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, “The Physical Content of General Covariance” in J. Eisenstaedt and A. Kox (eds.), Studies in the History of General Relativity (Volume 3: Einstein Studies), Boston: Birkhauser, pp. 281–315. (Scholar)
–––, 1992a, “Philosophy of Space and Time,” in M.H. Salmon et al., Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; reprinted Hackett Publishing, pp. 179–231. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “General Covariance and the Foundations of General Relativity: Eight Decades of Dispute,” Reports on Progress in Physics, 56: 791–858. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Causation as Folk Science,” Philosophers’ Imprint, 3 (4) [available Online]. (Scholar)
–––, 2003a, “General Covariance, Gauge Theories, and the Kretschmann Objection,” in K. Brading and E. Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–123. (Scholar)
Renn, Juergen, et al. (eds.), 2007, The Genesis of General Relativity: Sources and Interpretations, (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 250), 4 Volumes, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
Rickles, Dean, 2005, “A New Spin on the Hole Argument,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physcis, 36: 415–34. (Scholar)
Rynasiewicz, Robert, 1992, “Rings, Holes and Substantivalism: On the Program of Leibniz Algebras,” Philosophy of Science, 45: 572–89. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, “The Lessons of the Hole Argument,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45: 407–436. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Is There a Syntactic Solution to the Hole Problem,” Philosophy of Science, 64 (Proceedings): S55–S62. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Simultaneity, convention, and gauge freedom” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43: pp.90–94. (Scholar)
Stachel, John, 1980, “Einstein’s Search for General Covariance,” in Don Howard and John Stachel (eds.), Einstein and the History of General Relativity (Einstein Studies, Volume 1), Boston: Birkhäuser, 1989, pp. 63–100. [This paper was first paper read at the Ninth International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, Jena.] (Scholar)
–––, 2014 “The Hole Argument and Some Physical and Philosophical Implications,” Living Reviews (Relativity), 17(1): available online. (Scholar)
–––, 1986, “What can a Physicist Learn from the Discovery of General Relativity?,” Proceedings of the Fourth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in General Relativity, R. Ruffini (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1857–62. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “The Meaning of General Covariance,” in J. Earman et al. (eds.), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Gruenbaum, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press/Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag Konstanz, pp. 129–160. (Scholar)
Teller, Paul, 1991, “Substances, Relations and Arguments About the Nature of Spacetime,” The Philosophical Review, 100 (3): 363–97. (Scholar)
Teitel, Trevor, 2019, “Holes in Spacetime: Some Neglected Essentials,” Journal of Philosophy, forthcoming, preprint available online. (Scholar)
Weatherall, James O., 2018, “Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69: 329–350, preprint available online. (Scholar)
Wilson, Mark, 1993, “There’s a Hole and a Bucket, Dear Leibniz,” in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Philosophy of Science, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 202–241. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Jun 5 08:19:49 2023

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...