Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Species" by Marc Ereshefsky
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Attenborough, R., 2015, “What are species and why does it
matter? Anopheline taxonomy and the transmission of malaria”,
in A. Behie and M. Oxemham (eds.), Taxonomic Tapestries: The
Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioral and Conservation Research,
Canberra: Australia National University Press, pp. 129–151. (Scholar)
- Barker, M., 2010, “Specious Intrinsicalism”, Philosophy of Science, 77: 73–91. (Scholar)
- –––, 2019a, “Eliminative Pluralism and Integrative Alternatives: The Case of Species”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70: 657–681. (Scholar)
- –––, 2019b, “Species and other Evolving Lineages as Feedback Systems”, in Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 11(13). doi:10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.013 (Scholar)
- Barker, M. and Wilson, R., 2010, “Cohesion, Gene Flow, and the Notion of Species”, Journal of Philosophy, 107: 59–77. (Scholar)
- Beatty, J., 1985, “Speaking of Species: Darwin’s
Strategy”, in The Darwinian Heritage, D. Kohn (ed.),
Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Boyd, R., 1999a, “Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa”, in R. Wilson (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, 141–185. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999b, “Kinds, complexity and multiple realization: comments on Millikan’s ‘Historical Kinds and the Special Sciences’”, Philosophical Studies, 95: 67– 98. (Scholar)
- Brigandt, I., 2003, “Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminativism”, Philosophy of Science, 70: 1305–1316. (Scholar)
- Buller, D., 2005, Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Claridge, M., Dawah, H., and Wilson, R., (eds.), 1997,
Species: The Units of Biodiversity, London: Chapman and
Hall. (Scholar)
- Cohan, F., 2001, “What are bacterial species?”,
Annual Review of Microbiology, 56: 457–487. (Scholar)
- Conix, S., 2019, “Radical Pluralism, Classificatory Norms and the Legitimacy of Species Classification”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, 73: 27–34. (Scholar)
- Coyne, J., and Orr, H., 2004, Speciation. Sunderland, MA:
Sinauer. (Scholar)
- Crane, J. 2004, “On the Metaphysics of Species”, Philosophy of Science, 71: 156–173 (Scholar)
- Crawford, E., 2008, “Biological Species are Natural
Kinds”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 46:
339–362. (Scholar)
- Currie, A., 2016, “The Mystery of the
Triceratops’s Mother: How to be a Realist about the
Species Category”, Erkenntnis, 81: 795–816. (Scholar)
- Darwin, C., 1859 [1964], On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile
of the First Edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press. (Scholar)
- Darwin, F., (ed.), 1877, The Life and Letters of Charles
Darwin, including an Autobiographical Chapter, London: John
Murray. (Scholar)
- de Queiroz, K., 1999, “The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category” in R. Wilson (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, 49–90. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “Different species problems and their resolution”, BioEssays, 27: 1263–1269. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Species concepts and species delimitation”, Systematic Biology, 56: 879–866. (Scholar)
- Devitt, M., 2008, “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism”, Philosophy of Science, 75: 344–382. (Scholar)
- –––, 2021, “Defending Intrinsic Biological Essentialism”, Philosophy of Science, 88: 67–82. (Scholar)
- Doolittle, F., 2019, “Speciation without species: A final word”, in Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 11(14). doi:10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.014 (Scholar)
- Doolittle, F., and Bapteste, E., 2007, “Pattern Pluralism
and the Tree of Life Hypothesis”, Proceedings of the
National Academy of Science, 104: 7257–7268. (Scholar)
- Doolittle, F., and Zhaxybayeva O., 2009, “On the origin of
prokaryotic species”, Genome Research, 19:
744–756. (Scholar)
- Dupré, J., 1993, The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “In Defence of Classification”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and the Biomedical Sciences, 32: 203–219. (Scholar)
- Dykuizen, D., and Green, L., 1991, “Recombination in
Escherichia coli and the definition of biological
species”, Journal of Bacteriology, 173:
7257–7268. (Scholar)
- Eldredge, N., 1985, Unfinished Synthesis, New York: Oxford
University Press. (Scholar)
- Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J., 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and
the Evolutionary Process, New York: Columbia University
Press. (Scholar)
- Ereshefsky, M.,1998, “Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 65: 103–120. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Foundational Issues Concerning Taxa and Taxon Names”, Systematic Biology, 56: 295–301. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010a, “What’s Wrong with the
New Biological Essentialism”, Philosophy of Science,
77: 674–685. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010b, “Microbiology and the Species Problem”, Biology and Philosophy, 25: 67–79. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010c, “Darwin’s Solution to
the Species Problem”, Synthese, 175:
405–425. (Scholar)
- Ereshefsky M., and Matthen, M., 2005, “Taxonomy, Polymorphism and History: An Introduction to Population Structure Theory”, Philosophy of Science, 72: 1–21. (Scholar)
- Frankham, R., Ballou, J., et al., 2021, “Implications of different
species concepts for preserving biodiversity”, Biological
Conservation, 153: 25–31. (Scholar)
- Franklin, L., 2007, “Bacteria, sex, and systematics”, Philosophy of Science, 74: 69–95. (Scholar)
- Ghiselin, M., 1969, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1974, “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem”, Systematic Zoology, 23: 536–544 (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity”, Biology and Philosophy, 2: 127–143. (Scholar)
- Griffiths, P., 1999, “Squaring the Circle: Natural Kinds with Historical Essences”, in Species: New Interdisciplinary Studies, R. Wilson (ed.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Haber, M., 2016, “The individuality thesis (3 ways)”, Biology and Philosophy, 31: 913–930. (Scholar)
- –––, 2019, “Species in the age of discordance”, in Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 11(21). doi:10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.021 (Scholar)
- Hey, J., 2001, “The mind of the species problem”,
Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16: 326–329. (Scholar)
- Hull, D., 1965, “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15: 314–326, 16: 1–18. (Scholar)
- –––, 1978, “A Matter of Individuality”, Philosophy of Science, 45: 335–360. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles”, Biology and Philosophy, 2: 168–183. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, Science as a Process, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kitcher, P., 1984, “Species”, Philosophy of Science, 51: 308–333. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, Science in a Democratic Society, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Scholar)
- Kohn, D., 2008, “Darwin’s keystone: The principle of
divergence”, in The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin
of Species”, M. Ruse and R. Richards (eds.), Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (Scholar)
- Kourany, J., 2010, Philosophy of Science After Feminism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- LaPorte, J., 2004, Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Lawrence, J., and Retchless, A., 2010, “The Myth of Bacterial Species and Speciation”, Biology and Philosophy, 25: 569–588. (Scholar)
- Lee, M., 2003, “Species concepts and species reality:
salvaging a Linnaean rank”, Journal of Evolutionary
Biology, 16: 179–188. (Scholar)
- Lewens, T., 2012, “Species, Essence and Explanation”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43: 751–757. (Scholar)
- Locke, J., 1690 [1975], An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, P. Nidditch (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Ludwig, D., 2016, “Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal”, Erkenntnis, 81: 1253–1272. (Scholar)
- Magnus, P., 2012, Scientific Enquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards, New York: Palgrave MacMillan. (Scholar)
- Mallet, J., 2008, “Mayr’s view of Darwin: was Darwin
wrong about speciation?”, Biological Journal of Linnaean
Society, 95: 3–16. (Scholar)
- Mayden, R., 2002, “On biological species, species concepts
and individuation in the natural world”, Fish and
Fisheries, 3: 171–196. (Scholar)
- Mayr, E., 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Millikan, R.,1999, “Historical Kinds and the ”Special
Sciences“”, Philosophical Studies, 95:
45–65. (Scholar)
- Mishler, B., and Brandon, R., 1987, “Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept”, Biology and Philosophy, 2: 397–414. (Scholar)
- Mishler, B., and Donoghue, M., 1982, “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism”, Systematic Zoology, 31: 491–503. (Scholar)
- Mishler, B., and Wilkins, J., 2018, “The Hunting of the SNaRC: A Snarky Solution to the Species Problem” in Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 10(1). doi:10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0010.001 (Scholar)
- Morgan G., and Pitts W., 2008, “Evolution without species: The case of mosaic bacteriophages”, British Journal for the Philosophy of science, 59: 745–765. (Scholar)
- Nesbo, C., Dultek, M., and Doolittle, F., 2006,
“Recombination in thermotoga: implications for species concepts
and biogeography”, Genetics, 172: 759–769. (Scholar)
- Novak, A., and Doolittle, F., 2021, “‘Species’
without species”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of
Science, 87: 72–80. (Scholar)
- Okasha, S., 2002, “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism”, Synthese, 131: 191–213. (Scholar)
- O’Malley, M., 2014, Philosophy of Microbiology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- O’Malley, M., and Dupré, J., 2007, “Size
doesn’t matter: towards a more inclusive philosophy of
Biology”, Biology and Philosophy, 22:
155–191. (Scholar)
- Pedroso, M., 2014, “Origin Essentialism in Biology”, Philosophical Quarterly, 64: 60–81. (Scholar)
- Pigliucci, M., 2003, “Species as family resemblance concepts: the (dis-)solution of the species problem?”, BioEssays, 25: 596–602. (Scholar)
- Reydon, T., 2003, “Species Are Individuals Or Are
They?” Philosophy of Science, 70: 49–56. (Scholar)
- Reydon, T. and Ereshefsky, M., 2022, “How to Incorporate Non-Epistemic Values in a Theory of Classification”, European Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 12(4). doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00438-6 (Scholar)
- Richards, R., 2010, The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Rosenberg, A., 1994, Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science, Chicago: Chicago University Press. (Scholar)
- Rossello-Mora, R., and Amann, R., 2001, “The species concept
for prokaryotes”, Federation of European Microbiological
Societies Microbiology Review, 25: 39–67. (Scholar)
- Slater, M., 2013, Are Species Real? An Essay on the Metaphysics of Species, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Sober, E., 1980, “Evolution, Population Thinking and Essentialism”, Philosophy of Science, 47: 350–383. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, “Sets, Species, and Natural
Kinds: A Reply to Philip Kitcher’s ‘Species’”,
Philosophy of Science, 51: 334–341. (Scholar)
- Stamos, D., 2007, Darwin and the nature of species, Albany, NY: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
- Templeton, A., 1989, “The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective”, in Speciation and its Consequences, E. Otte and J. Endler (eds.), Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. (Scholar)
- Velasco, J., 2010, “Species, Genes, and the Tree of Life”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61: 599–619. (Scholar)
- Wilkins, J., 2003, “How to be a chaste species pluralist-realist”, Biology and Philosophy, 18: 621–638. (Scholar)
- Wilkins, J., 2009, Species: The history of the idea, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Wilson, R., 1999, “Realism, Essence, and Kind: Resuscitating Species Essentialism?”, in Species: New Interdisciplinary Studies, R. Wilson (ed.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Wilson, R., Barker, M., Brigandt, I., 2007, “When traditional essentialism fails: biological natural kinds”, Philosophical Topics, 35: 189–215. (Scholar)
- Zachos, F., Apollonia, M., et al., 2013, “Species inflation and
taxonomic artefacts –A critical comment on recent trends in mammalian
classification”, Mammalian Biology, 78: 1–6. (Scholar)