[All references to Spinoza’s Ethics use the form of PartTypeNumberSubtype (so “EIp4d” means Part One, Proposition Four, Demonstration). Other variants of types include “d” for definition, “ax” for axiom, and “le” for lemma. Other subtypes include “s” for scholium and “c” for corollary. Spinoza’s letters are cited as Ep, using their standard numbering. All other citations from Spinoza’s corpus are cited by volume/page of Edwin Curley’s Collected Works, from which all translations are also taken.

• Bennett, Jonathan, 1991. “Spinoza’s Monism: A Reply to Curley,” in God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics, Yirmiyahu Yovel (ed.), 53–60, Leiden: E.J. Brill. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984. A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. (Scholar)
• Carriero, John P., 1995. “On the Relationship between Mode and Substance in Spinoza’s Metaphysics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33: 245–73. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991. “Spinoza’s Views on Necessity in Historical Perspective,” Philosophical Topics, 19: 47–96. (Scholar)
• Chignell, Andrew, 2012. “Kant, Real Possibility, and the Threat of Spinoza,” Mind, 121: 635–675 (Scholar)
• Curley, Edwin, 1988. Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1969. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard. (Scholar)
• Curley, Edwin, and Gregory Walski, 1999. “Spinoza’s Necessitarianism Reconsidered,” in New Essays on the Rationalists, R. Gennaro and C. Huenemann (eds.), 241–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Della Rocca, Michael, 2010. “PSR,” Philosopher’s Imprint, 10 (7) [available online].
• –––, 2001. “Spinoza’s Substance Monism,” in Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, Olli Koistinen and John Biro (eds.), 11–37, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Descartes, Rene. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, R. Stoothoff, J. Cottingham, and D. Murdoch (trans.), 3 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
• Di Poppa, Francesca, 2013. “Spinoza on Causation and Power,” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 51(3): 297–319. (Scholar)
• Garrett, Don, 2009. “The Essence of the Body and the Part of the Mind that is Eternal,” in A Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics, Olli Koistinen (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1979. “Spinoza’s ‘Ontological’ Argument,” Philosophical Review, 88: 198–223. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991. “Spinoza’s Necessitarianism,” in God and Nature in Spinoza’s Metaphysics, Yirmiyahu Yovel (ed.), 191–218, Leiden: E.J. Brill. (Scholar)
• Hübner, Karolina, 2014. “Spinoza’s Thinking Substance and the Necessity of Modes,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92(1): 1–40. (Scholar)
• Huenemann, Charles, 1999. “The Necessity of Finite Modes and Geometrical Containment in Spinoza’s Metaphysics,” in New Essays on the Rationalists, R. Gennaro and C. Huenemann (eds.), 224–40, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Koistinen, Olli, 2003. “Spinoza’s Proof of Necessitarianism,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66(2): 283–310. (Scholar)
• Laerke, Mogens, 2008. Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza, Paris: Champion. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. “Spinoza’s Cosmological Argument in the Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 49(4): 439–462. (Scholar)
• Leibniz, G.W., 2005. Confessio Philosophi and Papers Concerning the Problem of Evil, 1671–1678, Robert Sleigh (trans.), New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1969. Philosophical Papers and Letters, L. Loemker (ed.), 2nd ed., Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
• Lin, Martin, 2007. “Spinoza’s Arguments for the Existence of God,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 75(2): 269–297. (Scholar)
• Lovejoy, Arthur O., 1936. The Great Chain of Being, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Martin, Christopher, 2010. “A New Challenge to the Necessitarian Reading of Spinoza,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 5: 25–70. (Scholar)
• Mason, Richard, 1986. “Spinoza on Modality,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 36(144): 313–342. (Scholar)
• Melamed, Yitzhak, 2010. “Acosmism or Weak Individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48: 77–92 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009. “Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Substance: The Substance-Mode Relation as a Relation of Inherence and Predication,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78(1): 17–82. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012. “Spinoza on Inherence, Causation and Conception,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 50(3): 365–386. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013. “Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Thought: Parallelisms and the Multifaceted Structure of Ideas,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(3): 636–683. (Scholar)
• Miller, Jon A., 2001. “Spinoza’s Possibilities,” Review of Metaphysics, 54(4): 779–815. (Scholar)
• Newlands, Samuel, 2010a. “Another Kind of Spinozistic Monism,” Noûs, 44(3): 469–502. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010b. “The Harmony of Spinoza and Leibniz,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(1): 64–104. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. “Hegel’s Idealist Reading of Spinoza,” Philosophy Compass, 6(2): 100–108. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013. “Leibniz and the Ground of Possibility,” The Philosophical Review, 122(2): 155–187. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016. “Backing Into Spinozism,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93(3): 511–537. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017. “Spinoza’s Relevance to Contemporary Metaphysics,” in Oxford Handbook to Spinoza, Michael Della Rocca (ed.), 601–626, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Spinoza. The Collected Works of Spinoza, Volumes 1 and 2, Edwin Curley (trans. and ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985 and 2016.
• –––. Opera, Carl Gebhardt (ed.), 4 vols., Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1925.
• Strickland, Lloyd, 2006. Leibniz Reinterpreted, London: Continuum. (Scholar)