Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Structure of Scientific Theories" by Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Ankeny, R. and S. Leonelli, 2020, Model Organisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Apostel, L., 1960, “Towards the Formal Study of Models in the Non-Formal Sciences,” Synthese, 12 (23): 125–161. (Scholar)
–––, 1970, “The Justification of Formalisation,” Quality and Quantity, 4 (1): 3–38. (Scholar)
Awodey, S., 2006, Category Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Bailer-Jones, D.M., 2002, “Models, Metaphors and Analogies,” in Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science, P.K. Machamer and M. Silberstein (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 108–127. (Scholar)
Barbujani, G., S. Ghirotto, and F. Tassi, 2013, “Nine Things to Remember about Human Genome Diversity,” Tissue Antigens, 82 (3): 155–164. (Scholar)
Barbujani, G.A., Magagni, E. Minch, and L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, 1997, “An Apportionment of Human DNA Diversity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94 (9): 4516–4519. (Scholar)
Bartha, P.F.A., 2010, By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments, New York: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
Bays, T., 2014, “Skolem’s Paradox”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/paradox-skolem/>. (Scholar)
Beatty, J., 1981, “What’s Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980, (2): 397–426. (Scholar)
Bergstrom, C. and L. Dugatkin, 2012, Evolution, New York: Norton. (Scholar)
Bird, A., 2013, “Thomas Kuhn”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/thomas-kuhn/>. (Scholar)
Blatti, S. and S. Lapointe (eds.), 2016, Ontology After Carnap, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Boumans, M., 1999, “Built-In Justification,” in Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, M.S. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–96. (Scholar)
Braithwaite, R., 1962, “Models in the Empirical Sciences,” in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 224–231. (Scholar)
Bridgman, P.W., 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
Bueno, O., 1997, “Empirical Adequacy: A Partial Structures Approach,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 28 (4): 585–610. (Scholar)
Bueno, O., S. French, and J. Ladyman, 2012, “Models and Structures: Phenomenological and Partial,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B), 43 (1): 43–46. (Scholar)
Brown, T., 2003, Making Truth: Metaphor in Science, Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
Brown, M.J., 2010, “Genuine Problems and the Significance of Science,” Contemporary Pragmatism, 7 (2): 131–153. (Scholar)
Callender, C., 1999, “Reducing Thermodynamics to Statistical Mechanics: The Case of Entropy,” The Journal of Philosophy, 96 (7): 348–373. (Scholar)
Campbell, N.R., 1920, Physics: The Elements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Carnap, R., 1967 [1928], The Logical Structure of the World, translated by R.A. George, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Original: Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Leipzig: Felix Meiner. (Scholar)
–––, 1932, “Über Protokollsätze”, Erkenntnis, 3: 215–228; transl. by R. Creath and R. Nollan, “On Protocol Sentences,” Noûs, 21 (4) (1987): 457–470. (Scholar)
–––, 1936/1937, “Testability and Meaning,” Philosophy of Science, 1936, 3 (4): 419–471; 1937, 4 (1): 1–40. (Scholar)
–––, 1937, The Logical Syntax of Language, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, & Trübner. (Scholar)
–––, 1939, Foundations of Logic and Mathematics (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume 1, Number 3), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1942, Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1952, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1962 [1950], Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2^nd edition. (Scholar)
–––, 1963, “Philosopher Replies,” in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (Library of Living Philosophers, Volume 11), P. Schilpp (ed.), La Salle: Open Court, pp. 889–999. (Scholar)
–––, 1966, Philosophical Foundations of Science, New York: Basic Books; repr. as An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, 1972; repr. New York: Dover, 1996. (Scholar)
Cartwright, N., 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1999a, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1999b, “Models and the Limits of Theories: Quantum Hamiltonians and the BCS Model of Superconductivity,” in Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, M. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), (Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241–281. (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “In Praise of the Representation Theorem,” in Representation, Evidence, and Justification: Themes from Suppes, W.K. Essler and M. Frauchiger (eds.), Ontos Verlag, pp. 83–90. (Scholar)
–––, 2019, Nature, the Artful Modeler: Lectures on Laws, Science, How Nature Arranges the World and How We Can Arrange It Better, Chicago, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
Cartwright, N., T. Shomar, and M. Suárez, 1995, “The Tool Box of Science: Tools for the Building of Models with a Superconductivity Example,” in Theories and Models in Scientific Processes (Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Volume 44), W. Herfel, W. Krajewski, I. Niiniluoto, and R. Wojcicki (eds.), Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 137–149. (Scholar)
Carus, A.W., 2007, Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Cat, J., 2014, “The Unity of Science”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/scientific-unity/>. (Scholar)
Chakravartty, A., 2001, “The Semantic or Model-Theoretic View of Theories and Scientific Realism,” Synthese, 127 (3): 325–345. (Scholar)
Chang, H., 2011, “The Philosophical Grammar of Scientific Practice” in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25 (3): 205–221. (Scholar)
Clatterbuck, H., E. Sober, and R. Lewontin, 2013, “Selection Never Dominates Drift (Nor Vice Versa),” Biology & Philosophy, 28 (4): 577–592. (Scholar)
Coffa, A. J., 1991, The Semantic Tradition From Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Contessa, G., 2006, “Scientific Models, Partial Structures and the New Received View of Theories,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 37 (2): 370–377. (Scholar)
Craver, C.F., 2002, “Structures of Scientific Theories,” in Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science, P.K. Machamer and M. Silberstein (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 55–79. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Creath, R., 1987, “The Initial Reception of Carnap’s Doctrine of Analyticity,” Noûs, 21 (4): 477–499. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Logical Empiricism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/logical-empiricism/>. (Scholar)
Crombie, A.C., 1994, Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition (Volumes 1–3), London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Commitments and Styles of European Scientific Thinking,” Theoria, 11 (25): 65–76. (Scholar)
Crow J. and M. Kimura, 1970, An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory, Edina, MN: Burgess International Group Incorporated. (Scholar)
da Costa, N.C.A. and S. French, 1990, “The Model-Theoretic Approach in the Philosophy of Science,” Philosophy of Science, 57 (2): 248–65. (Scholar)
–––, 2003. Science and Partial Truth: A Unitary Approach to Models and Scientific Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Dalla Chiara Scabia, M.L. and G. Toraldo di Francia, 1973, “A Logical Analysis of Physical Theories,” La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, 3 (1): 1–20. (Scholar)
Davidson, A., 2001, The emergence of sexuality: Historical epistemology and the formation of concepts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Davidson, D., 1974, “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47: 5–20. (Scholar)
de Chadarevian, S. and N. Hopwood, 2004, Models: The Third Dimension of Science, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
Demopoulos, W., 2003, “On the Rational Reconstruction of our Theoretical Knowledge,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54 (3): 371–403. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, Logicism and Its Philosophical Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Derman, E., 2011, Models Behaving Badly: Why Confusing Illusion with Reality Can Lead to Disaster, on Wall Street and in Life, New York: Free Press. (Scholar)
Dizadji-Bahmani, F., R. Frigg, and S. Hartmann, 2010, “Who’s Afraid of Nagelian Reduction?,” Erkenntnis, 73 (3): 393–412. (Scholar)
Downes, S., 1992, “The Importance of Models in Theorizing: A Deflationary Semantic View,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992, (1): 142–153. (Scholar)
–––, “Heritability,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/heredity/>. (Scholar)
Dreyfus, H., 1986, “Why Studies of Human Capacities Modeled on Ideal Natural Science Can Never Achieve their Goal,” in Rationality, Relativism, and the Human Sciences, J. Margolis, M. Krausz, and R. Burian (eds.), Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 3–22. (Scholar)
Duhem, P., 1906, La théorie physique: Son objet et sa structure, Paris: Chevalier et Rivière; transl. by P.W. Wiener, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1954). (Scholar)
Edge, M.D. and N. Rosenberg, 2015, “Implications of the Apportionment of Human Genetic Diversity for the Apportionment of Human Phenotypic Diversity,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 52: 32–45. (Scholar)
Edwards, A.W.F., 2003, “Human Genetic Diversity: Lewontin‘s Fallacy” BioEssays, 25 (8): 798–801. (Scholar)
Eilenberg, S. and S. MacLane, 1945, “General Theory of Natural Equivalences,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 58 (2): 231–294. (Scholar)
Einstein, A., 1934, “On the Method of Theoretical Physics,” Philosophy of Science, 1 (2): 163–169. (Scholar)
–––, 1936, “Physik und Realität,” Journal of The Franklin Institute, 221 (3): 313–347; transl. by J. Piccard, “Physics and Reality,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, 221 (3) (1936): 349–382. (Scholar)
Elwick, J., 2007, Styles of Reasoning in British Life Sciences: Shared Assumptions, 1820–1858, London: Pickering & Chatto. (Scholar)
Feigl, H., 1970, “The ‘Orthodox’ View of Theories: Remarks in Defense as Well as Critique,” in Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 4), M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–16. (Scholar)
Feigl, H., M. Scriven, and G. Maxwell (eds.), 1958, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Volume 2), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
Flyvbjerg, B., 2001, Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
French, S., 2017, “Identity Conditions, Idealisations and Isomorphisms: a Defence of the Semantic Approach,” first online 19 September 2017, Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1564-z (Scholar)
French, S. and J. Ladyman, 1997, “Superconductivity and Structures: Revisiting the London Account,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 28 (3): 363–393. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, “Reinflating the Semantic Approach,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 13 (2): 103–121. (Scholar)
–––, 2003. “Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure,” Synthese, 136 (1): 31–56. (Scholar)
Friedman, M., 1981, “Theoretical Explanation,” in Reduction, Time, and Reality: Studies in the Philosophy of the Natural Sciences, R. Healey (ed.), New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16. (Scholar)
–––, 1982, “The Scientific Image, by B. van Fraassen,” The Journal of Philosophy, 79 (5): 274–283. (Scholar)
–––, 1983, Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, Reconsidering Logical Positivism, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, Dynamics of Reason, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Carnap on Theoretical Terms: Structuralism without Metaphysics,” Synthese, 180 (2): 249–263. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Frigg, R. and S. Hartmann, 2012, “Models in Science”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/models-science/>. (Scholar)
Frigg, R. and I. Votsis, 2011, “Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Structural Realism but Were Afraid to Ask,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1 (2): 227–276. (Scholar)
Galison, P., 1987, How Experiments End, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1988, “History, Philosophy, and the Central Metaphor,” Science in Context, 2 (1): 197–212. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Geary, J., 2011, I Is an Other: The Secret Life of Metaphor and How It Shapes the Way We See The World, New York: Harper Perennial. (Scholar)
Gentner, D., 1982, “Are Scientific Analogies Metaphors?” in Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, D. Miall (ed.), Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 106–132. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Analogical Reasoning, Psychology of,” in Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, L. Nadel (ed.), London: Nature Publishing Group, pp. 106–112. (Scholar)
Giere, R., 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “How Models Are Used to Represent Reality,” Philosophy of Science, 71 (5): 742–752. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “An Agent-based Conception of Models and Scientific Representation,” Synthese, 172 (2): 269–281. (Scholar)
Giere, R., B. Bickle, and R. Mauldin, 2006, Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 5^th edition. (Scholar)
Ginnobili, S., 2016, “Missing Concepts in Natural Selection Theory Reconstructions,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 38 (Article 8). doi:10.1007/s40656-016-0109-y (Scholar)
Godfrey-Smith, P., 2003, Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “The Strategy of Model-Based Science,” Biology and Philosophy, 21 (5): 725–740. (Scholar)
Gould, S.J., 2002, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Griesemer, J., 1990, “Modeling in the Museum: On the Role of Remnant Models in the Work of Joseph Grinnell,” Biology and Philosophy, 5 (1): 3–36. (Scholar)
–––, 1991a, “Material Models in Biology,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990, (2): 79–94. (Scholar)
–––, 1991b, “Must Scientific Diagrams Be Eliminable? The Case of Path Analysis,” Biology and Philosophy, 6 (2): 155–180. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Formalization and the Meaning of Theory in the Inexact Biological Sciences,” Biological Theory, 7 (4): 298–310. (Scholar)
Hacking, I., 1983, Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, Historical Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2007a, “On Not Being a Pragmatist: Eight Reasons and a Cause,” in New Pragmatists, C. Misak (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–49. (Scholar)
–––, 2007b, “Natural Kinds: Rosy Dawn, Scholastic Twilight,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 61: 203–240. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, Scientific Reason, Taipei: National Taiwan University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Introduction,” in T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 50^th Anniversary ed. (4^th ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. vii–xxxvii. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics At All?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Halvorson, H., 2012, “What Scientific Theories Could Not Be,” Philosophy of Science, 79 (2): 183–206. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “The Semantic View, if Plausible, is Syntactic,” Philosophy of Science, 80 (3): 475–478. (Scholar)
–––, 2019, The Logic in Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Hartl, D. and A. Clark, 1989, Principles of Population Genetics, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. (Scholar)
Hempel, C., 1952, Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1958, “The Theoretician’s Dilemma,” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Volume 2), H. Feigl, M. Scriven, and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 37–98. (Scholar)
–––, 1966, Philosophy of Natural Science, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
–––, 1970, “On the ‘Standard Conception’ of Scientific Theories,” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Volume 4), M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 142–163. (Scholar)
Hermes, H. 1938, Eine Axiomatisierung der allgemeinen Mechanik (Forschungen zur Logik und zur Grundlegung der exacten Wissenschaften, Heft 3), Leipzig: S. Hirzel. (Scholar)
–––, 1959, “Zur Axiomatisierung der Mechanik,” in The Axiomatic Method with Special Reference to Geometry and Physics: Proceedings of an International Symposium Held at the University of California, Berkeley, December 26, 1957–January 4, 1958, L. Henkin, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 282–290. (Scholar)
Hesse, M., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1967, “Models and Analogy in Science,” in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Volume 5), P. Edwards (ed.), New York: Macmillan, pp. 354–359. (Scholar)
Hitchcock, C. and J.D. Velasco, 2014, “Newtonian and Evolutionary Forces,” Ergo, 1 (2): 39–77. (Scholar)
Hochman, A., 2013, “Against the New Racial Naturalism,” The Journal of Philosophy 110 (6): 331–351. (Scholar)
Hodges, W., 1997, A Shorter Model Theory, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Model Theory”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/model-theory/>. (Scholar)
Hoffman, R., 1980, “Metaphor in Science,” in Cognition and Figurative Language, R. Honeck (ed.), Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 393–423. (Scholar)
Holton, G., 1988, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2^nd edition. (Scholar)
Hookway, C., 2013, “Pragmatism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/pragmatism/>. (Scholar)
Hull, D., 1975, “Central Subjects and Historical Narratives,” History & Theory, 14 (3): 253–274. (Scholar)
Jammer, M., 1961, Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; reprinted unabridged by Dover in 1997. (Scholar)
Jobling, M.A., M. Hurles, C. Tyler-Smith, 2004, Human Evolutionary Genetics. Origins, Peoples and Diseases, New York: Garland Science. (Scholar)
Jones, M., 2005, “Idealization and Abstraction: A Framework,” in Idealization XII: Correcting the Model – Idealization and Abstraction in the Sciences (Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Volume 86), M. Jones and N. Cartwright (eds.), Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 173–217. (Same individual as Thomson-Jones 2012.) (Scholar)
Kaplan, J.M. and R.G. Winther, 2013, “Prisoners of Abstraction? The Theory and Measure of Genetic Variation, and the Very Concept of ‘Race’,” Biological Theory, 7 (4): 401–412. (Scholar)
Keller, E.F., 1995, Reconfiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
Kitcher P., 1984, “1953 and All That. A Tale of Two Sciences,” Philosophical Review, 93 (3): 335–373. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusion, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, Science, Truth, and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Krivine, J., 2013 [1971], Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory (Synthese Library, Volume 34), Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
Kuhn, T.S., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2^nd edition. (Scholar)
–––, 1977, “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice,” in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, T.S. Kuhn (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 320–339. (Scholar)
Ladyman, J., 2014, “Structural Realism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/structural-realism/>. (Scholar)
Ladyman, J., O. Bueno, M. Suárez, and B. van Fraassen, 2011, “Scientific Representation: A Long Journey from Pragmatics to Pragmatics,” Metascience, 20 (3): 417–442. (Scholar)
Lakatos, I., 1980, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Philosophical Papers: Volume 1), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Laudan, L., 1977, Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
Leonelli, S., 2008, “Performing Abstraction: Two Ways of Modelling Arabidopsis thaliana,” Biology and Philosophy, 23 (4): 509–528. (Scholar)
Levins, R., 1966, “The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology,” American Scientist, 54 (4): 421–431. (Scholar)
Levins, R. and R. Lewontin, 1985, The Dialectical Biologist, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Lewis, R.W., 1980, “Evolution: A System of Theories,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 23 (4): 551–572. (Scholar)
Lewontin, R.C., 1972, “Apportionment of Human Diversity,” Evolutionary Biology, 6: 381–398. (Scholar)
–––, 1974, The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
Lloyd, E., 1983, “The Nature of Darwin’s Support for the Theory of Natural Selection,” Philosophy of Science, 50 (1): 112–129. (Scholar)
–––, 1994 [1988], The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2013 In Press, “Structure of Evolutionary Theory,” in International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, W. Durham (ed.), 2^nd edition, Amsterdam: Elsevier. (Scholar)
London, F. and H. London, 1935, “The Electromagnetic Equations of the Supraconductor,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 149 (866): 71–88. (Scholar)
Longino, H.E., 1995, “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues,” Synthese 104 (3): 383–397. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression & Sexuality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
López Beltrán, C., 1987, “La Explicación Evolucionista y el Uso de Modelos,” Masters Thesis, Posgrado en Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (Iztapalapa). (Scholar)
Lorenzano, P., 2013, “The Semantic Conception and the Structuralist View of Theories: A Critique of Suppe’s Criticisms,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 44: 600–607. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “What is the Status of the Hardy-Weinberg Law within Population Genetics?,” in European Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Science in Europe and the Viennese Heritage (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook: Volume 17), M.C. Galavotti, E. Nemeth, F.L. Stadler F. (eds.), Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 159–172. (Scholar)
Lowry, I., 1965, “A Short Course in Model Design,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31 (2): 158–166. (Scholar)
Ludwig, D., 2015. “Against the New Metaphysics of Race,” Philosophy of Science 82: 1–21. (Scholar)
Lutz, S., 2012, “On a Straw Man in the Philosophy of Science: A Defense of the Received View,” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 2 (1): 77–120. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “What’s Right with a Syntactic Approach to Theories and Models?” Erkenntnis, 79 (8 supplement): 1475–1492. (Scholar)
–––, 2017, What “Was the Syntax-Semantics Debate in the Philosophy of Science About?,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 95 (2): 319–352. (Scholar)
Mancosu, P., 2010, “Mathematical Style”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/mathematical-style/>. (Scholar)
Margenau, H., 1950, The Nature of Physical Reality: A Philosophy of Modern Physics, New York: McGraw-Hill. (Scholar)
Marker, D., 2002, Model Theory: An Introduction, New York: Springer. (Scholar)
Martínez, S., 2003, Geografía de las prácticas científicas: Racionalidad, heurística y normatividad, Mexico City: UNAM Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Technological Scaffolds for Culture and Cognition,” in Developing Scaffolds in Evolution, Culture and Cognition, L. Caporael, J. Griesemer, and W. Wimsatt (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 249–264. (Scholar)
Matheson, C. and J. Dallmann, 2014, “Historicist Theories of Scientific Rationality”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/rationality-historicist/>. (Scholar)
McKinsey, J.C.C., A.C. Sugar, and P. Suppes, 1953, “Axiomatic Foundations of Classical Particle Mechanics,” Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 2 (2): 253–272. (Scholar)
Minsky, M., 1965, “Matter, Mind, and Models,” in Proceedings of the International Federation for Information Processing Congress (Volume 1), W. Kalenich (ed.), Washington D.C.: Spartan Books, pp. 45–49. (Scholar)
Morgan, M., 2012, The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Morgan, M.S. and M. Morrison (eds.), 1999, Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Mormann, T., 2007, “The Structure of Scientific Theories in Logical Empiricism,” The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, in A. Richardson and T. Uebel (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–162. (Scholar)
Morrison, M., 2007, “Where Have All the Theories Gone?,” Philosophy of Science, 74 (2): 195–228. (Scholar)
Moulines, C., 1976, “Approximate Application of Empirical Theories: A General Explication,” Erkenntnis, 10 (2): 201–227. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, “Introduction: Structuralism as a Program for Modelling Theoretical Science,” Synthese, 130 (1): 1–11. (Scholar)
Nagel, E., 1961, The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Scholar)
–––, 1979, “Issues in the Logic of Reductive Explanations,” in Teleology Revisited and Other Essays in the Philosophy and History of Science, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 95–117. (Scholar)
Neurath, O., 1932, “Protokollsätze”, Erkenntnis, 3: 204–214; “Protocol Statements,” in Philosophical Papers 1913-1946, R.S. Cohen and M. Neurath (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel (1983), pp. 91–99. (Scholar)
Nicholson, D. and R. Gawne, 2014, “Rethinking Woodger’s Legacy in the Philosophy of Biology,” Journal of the History of Biology, 47 (2): 243–292. (Scholar)
Nolte, D.D., 2010, “The Tangled Tale of Phase Space,” Physics Today, April: 33–38. (Scholar)
Okasha, S., 2012, “Population Genetics”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/population-genetics/>. (Scholar)
Oppenheimer, J.R., 1956, “Analogy in Science,” American Psychologist, 11 (3): 127–135. (Scholar)
Oyama, S., 2000, The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution, 2^nd ed., Durham: Duke University Press. (Scholar)
Pereda, C., 2013, “Ulises Moulines y la concepción estructural de las teorías científicas,” in La filosofía en México en el siglo XX: Apuntes de un participante, C. Pereda, Mexico City: CONACULTA (Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes), pp. 200–212. (Scholar)
Pickstone, J.V., 2000, Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Pigliucci, M. and G.B. Müller, 2010, Evolution: The Extended Synthesis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Popper, K., 1996 [1976], “The Myth of the Framework,” In The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality, M. A. Notturno (ed), Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 33–64. (Scholar)
Pritchard J.K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly, 2000, “Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data,” Genetics, 155 (2): 945–959. (Scholar)
Preston, J., 2012, “Paul Feyerabend”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/feyerabend/>. (Scholar)
Przełęcki, M., 1969, The Logic of Empirical Theories, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
Putnam, H., 1962, “What Theories Are Not,” in Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 240–251. (Scholar)
Reichenbach, H., 1938, Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1965 [1920], The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge, with an introduction by M. Reichenbach, Berkeley: University of California Press. Original: Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis apriori, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
–––, 1969 [1924], The Axiomatization of the Theory of Relativity, with an introduction by W.C. Salmon. Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press. Original: Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Braunschweig: F. Vieweg & Sohn. (Scholar)
–––, 1978, Selected Writings, 1909–1953: With a Selection of Biographical and Autobiographical Sketches (Volumes 1–2), Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
Rice, S., 2004, Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. (Scholar)
Richards, R., 1992, “The Structure of Narrative Explanation in History and Biology,” in History and Evolution, M. Nitecki and D. Nitecki (eds.), Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 19–53. (Scholar)
Richardson, A., 2002, “Engineering Philosophy of Science: American Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism in the 1930s,” Philosophy of Science, 69 (S3): S36–S47. (Scholar)
Rosenberg N.A., J.K. Pritchard, J.L. Weber, H.M. Cann, K.K. Kidd, L.A. Zhivotovsky, and M.A. Feldman, 2002, “Genetic Structure of Human Populations,” Science, 298 (5602): 2381–2385. (Scholar)
Rosenblueth, A. and N. Wiener, 1945, “The Role of Models in Science,” Philosophy of Science, 12 (4): 316–321. (Scholar)
Ruse, M., 1975, “Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: An Analysis,” Journal of the History of Biology, 8 (2): 219–241. (Scholar)
Rutte, H., 1991, “Neurath contra Schlick. On the Discussion of Truth in the Vienna Circle,” in Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle: Austrian studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle, T. Uebel (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 169–174. (Scholar)
Sarkar, S., 1998, Genetics and Reductionism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Savage, C.W., 1990, “Preface,” in Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume 14, C.W. Savage (ed.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. vii–ix. (Scholar)
Schaffner K., 1969, “Correspondence Rules,” Philosophy of Science, 36 (3): 280–290. (Scholar)
–––, 1976, “Reductionism in Biology: Prospects and Problems,” in PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974: 613–632. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Schlick, M., 1925 [1918], General Theory of Knowledge, LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
–––, 1934, “Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis,” Erkenntnis, 4 (1): 79–99. (Scholar)
Schmidt, H.-J., 2014, “Structuralism in Physics”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/physics-structuralism/>. (Scholar)
Shapin, S. and S. Schaffer, 1985, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Simon, H., 1954, “The Axiomatization of Classical Mechanics,” Philosophy of Science, 21 (4): 340–343. (Scholar)
–––, 1957, Models of Man, New York: Wiley. (Scholar)
–––, 1970, “The Axiomatization of Physical Theories,” Philosophy of Science, 37 (1): 16–26. (Scholar)
Smith, B.C., 1996, On the Origin of Objects, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Sneed, J., 1979, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 2^nd edition. (Scholar)
Spencer, Q., 2015, “Philosophy of Race Meets Population Genetics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 52: 46–55. (Scholar)
Stegmüller, W., 1976, The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, New York: Springer. (Scholar)
–––, 1979, “The Structuralist View: Survey, Recent Developments and Answers to Some Criticisms”, in The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change, I. Niiniluoto and R. Tuomela (eds.), Amsterdam: North Holland. (Scholar)
Suárez, M., 1999, “The Role of Models in the Application of Scientific Theories; Epistemological Implications,” in Models as Mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, M.S. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 168–196. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, Comment on van Fraassen Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective, in Ladyman, J., O. Bueno, M. Suárez, and B. van Fraassen, “Scientific Representation: A Long Journey from Pragmatics to Pragmatics,” Metascience, 20 (3): 428–433. (Scholar)
Suárez, M. and N. Cartwright, 2008, “Theories: Tools versus Models,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39 (1): 62–81. (Scholar)
Suárez, M. and F. Pero, 2019, “The Representational Semantic Conception,” Philosophy of Science, 86 (2): 344–365. (Scholar)
Suppe, F., 1977, The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, Chicago: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1998, (2): S102–S115. (Scholar)
Suppes, P., 1957, Introduction to Logic, Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Co. (Scholar)
–––, 1960, “A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences,” Synthese, 12 (2-3): 287–301. (Scholar)
–––, 1962, “Models of Data,” in Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 252–261. (Scholar)
–––, 1967, “What is a Scientific Theory?,” In Philosophy of Science Today, S. Morgenbesser (ed.), New York: Basic Books, pp. 55–67. (Scholar)
–––, 1968, “The Desirability of Formalization in Science,” The Journal of Philosophy, 65 (20): 651–664. (Scholar)
–––, 1978, “The Plurality of Science,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978, (2): 3–16. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
Swoyer, C., 2014, “Relativism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/relativism/>. (Scholar)
Thompson, P., 1989, The Structure of Biological Theories, Albany: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “Formalisations of Evolutionary Biology,” in Philosophy of Biology, M. Matthen and C. Stephens (eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 485–523 (Scholar)
Thomson-Jones, M., 2012, “Modelling without Mathematics,” Philosophy of Science, 79 (5): 761–772. (Same individual as Jones 2005.) (Scholar)
Toulmin, S., 1972, Human Understanding: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Tuomi, J., 1981, “Structure and Dynamics of Darwinian Evolutionary Theory,” Systematic Zoology, 30 (1): 22–31. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, “Evolutionary Synthesis: A Search for the Strategy,” Philosophy of Science, 59 (3): 429–438. (Scholar)
Tversky, A., 1977, “Features of Similarity,” Psychological Review, 84 (4): 327–352. (Scholar)
Uebel, T., 2014, “Vienna Circle”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/vienna-circle/>. (Scholar)
van Benthem J., 2012, “The Logic of Empirical Theories Revisited,” Synthese, 186 (3): 775–792. (Scholar)
van Fraassen, B., 1967, “Meaning Relations among Predicates,” Noûs, 1 (2): 161–179. (Scholar)
–––, 1970, “On the Extension of Beth’s Semantics of Physical Theories,” Philosophy of Science, 37 (3): 325–339. (Scholar)
–––, 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1981, “Theory Construction and Experiment: An Empiricist View,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980, (2): 663–678. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, Laws and Symmetry, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2008, Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
van Riel, R. and R. Van Gulick, 2014, “Scientific Reduction”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/scientific-reduction/>. (Scholar)
Van Valen, L., 1976, “Domains, Deduction, the Predictive Method, and Darwin,” Evolutionary Theory, 1: 231–245. (Scholar)
Vicedo, M., 1995, “Scientific Styles: Toward Some Common Ground in the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science,” Perspectives on Science, 3: 231–254. (Scholar)
Vickers, P., 2009, “Can Partial Structures Accommodate Inconsistent Science?” Principia, 13 (2): 233–250. (Scholar)
Walsh, D., 2015, Organisms, Agency, and Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Weisberg, M., 2013, Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Wessels, L., 1976, “Laws and Meaning Postulates in van Fraassen’s View of Theories,” in PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974: 215–234. (Scholar)
Williams, M., 1970, “Deducing the Consequences of Selection: A Mathematical Model,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 48: 343–385. (Scholar)
–––, 1973, “The Logical Status of Natural Selection and other Evolutionary Controversies: Resolution by Axiomatization,” in M. Bunge (ed.), The Methodological Unity of Science, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 84–102. (Scholar)
Wimsatt, W.C., 2007, Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Winsberg, E., 2010, Science in the Age of Computer Simulation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2018, Philosophy and Climate Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Winther, R.G., 2006a, “Parts and Theories in Compositional Biology,” Biology and Philosophy, 21 (4): 471–499. (Scholar)
–––, 2006b, “Fisherian and Wrightian Perspectives in Evolutionary Genetics and Model-Mediated Imposition of Theoretical Assumptions,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 240 (2): 218–232. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “Schaffner’s Model of Theory Reduction: Critique and Reconstruction,” Philosophy of Science, 76 (2): 119–142. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Part-Whole Science,” Synthese, 178 (3): 397–427. (Scholar)
–––, 2012a, “Mathematical Modeling in Biology: Philosophy and Pragmatics,” Frontiers in Plant Evolution and Development, 3: 102, doi:10.3389/fpls.2012.00102 (Scholar)
–––, 2012b, “Interweaving Categories: Styles, Paradigms, and Models,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 43 (4): 628–639. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “The Genetic Reification of ‘Race’? A Story of Two Mathematical Methods,” Critical Philosophy of Race, 2 (2): 204–223. (Scholar)
–––, 2020, When Maps Become the World, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Winther, R.G., R. Giordano, M.D. Edge, and R. Nielsen, 2015, “The Mind, the Lab, and the Field: Three Kinds of Populations in Scientific Practice,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 52: 12–21. (Scholar)
Winther, R.G. and J.M. Kaplan, 2013, “Ontologies and Politics of Biogenomic ‘Race’,” Theoria. A Journal of Social and Political Theory (South Africa), 60 (3): 54–80. (Scholar)
Woodger J.H., 1937, The Axiomatic Method in Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1959, “Studies in the Foundations of Genetics,” in The Axiomatic Method with Special Reference to Geometry and Physics: Proceedings of an International Symposium Held at the University of California, Berkeley, December 26, 1957–January 4, 1958, L. Henkin, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 408–428. (Scholar)
Worrall, J., 1984, “An Unreal Image,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35 (1): 65–80. (Scholar)
Wright, S., 1969, Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: A Treatise in Four Volumes (Volume 2: The Theory of Gene Frequencies), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Zach, R., 2009, “Hilbert’s Program”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/hilbert-program/>. (Scholar)
Ziman, J., 2000, Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Jan 13 12:42:35 2025

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...