Latin Editions of Suárez's Works

• Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in libros Aristotelis ‘De anima’, Salvador Castellote Cubells (ed.), Madrid: Sociedad de Estudios y Publicaciones, 1978–1991. (Scholar)
• Conselhos e Pareceres, 3 vols, Coimbra: Biblioteca Geral da Universidade de Coimbra, 1948–1952.
• Opera omnia, M. André and C. Berton (eds). 28 vols. Paris: Ludovicus Vivès, 1856–1878.

Suárez in English Translation

See Sydney Penner's excellent website: Suarez in English Translation.

Works Cited and Secondary Literature in English

• Aho, Tuomo, 2007, “Suárez on Cognitive Intentions”, in Mind Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle's “De anima”, Paul J.J.M. Bakker and Johannes M.M.H. Thijssen (eds), Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 180–202. (Scholar)
• Åkerlund, Erik, 2009, “Suárez on Forms, Universals and Understanding”, Studia Neoaristotelica, 6: 159–182. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, “Suárez's Ideas on Natural Law in the Light of His Philosophical Anthropology and Moral Psychology”, in The Nature of Rights: Moral and Political Aspects of Rights in Late Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, Virpi Mäkinen (ed.), Acta Philosphica Fennica [87], Helsinki, pp. 165–196. (Scholar)
• Ariew, Roger, 2012, “Descartes and Liebniz as Readers of Suárez: Theory of Distinctions and Principle of Individuation”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 38–56. (Scholar)
• Arp, Robert, 2002, “An Analysis of Freedom in the Political Doctrines of Suárez and Filmer”, Philosophical Inquiry, 26: 53–82. (Scholar)
• Ashworth, E.J., 1995, “Suárez on the Analogy of Being: Some Historical Background”, Vivarium, 33: 50–75. (Scholar)
• Austin, John, 1869, Lectures on Jurisprudence, London: Murray. (Scholar)
• Brandão, Mario, 1974, “Nota ao etudo ‘A livraria do Padre Francisco Suárez’”, in his Etudos varios, Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra. (Scholar)
• Brett, Annabel, 1999, “Individual and Community in the ‘Second Scholastic’: Subjective Rights in Domingo de Soto and Francisco Suárez”, in Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century, Constance Blackwell and Sachiko Kusukawa (eds), Aldershot: Ashgate. (Scholar)
• Burlando, Giannina, 2006, “Suarez on Intrinsic Representationalism”, in Intellect et imagination dans la philosophie médiévale, III, Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 1941–1957. (Scholar)
• Burns, Patout, 1964, “Action in Suárez”, New Scholasticism, 38: 453–73. (Scholar)
• Cajetan [Thomas de Vio], 1540–41, Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici Opera Omnia iussum pensaque Leonis XIII, cum commentariis Thomae de Vio Caietani Ordinis Praedicatorum, Rome: Typographia Polyglotta, vol. 8, 1895. (Scholar)
• Cantens, Bernardo J., 2000, “The Relationship between God and Essences and the Notion of Eternal Truths according to Francisco Suarez”, The Modern Schoolman, 77: 127–143. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “Suárez on Beings of Reason: What Kind of Beings (entia) are beings of Reason, and What Kind of Being (esse) Do They Have?”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 77: 171–187. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Suárez's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God”, in Schwartz 2012a: 89–14. (Scholar)
• Cronin, Timothy J., 1966, Objective Being in Descartes and Suárez, Rome: Gregorian University Press. (Scholar)
• Cross, Richard, 2005, “Duns Scotus and Suárez at the Origins of Modernity”, in Deconstructing Radical Orthodoxy. Postmodern Theology, Rhetoric and Truth, Wayne J. Hankey and Douglas Hedley (eds), Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 65–80. (Scholar)
• Daniel, Stephen H., 2000, “Berkeley, Suárez and the Esse-Existere Distinction”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 74: 621–636. (Scholar)
• Descartes, René, 1984, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (vol. 3), J. Cottingham et al. (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Daniel, William, 1968, The Purely Penal Law Theory in the Spanish Theologians from Vitoria to Suárez, Rome: Gregorian University Press. (Scholar)
• Des Chene, Dennis, 1996, Physiologia. Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Suárez on Propinquity and the Efficient Cause”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 89–100. (Scholar)
• Doig, James C., 1977, “Suárez, Descartes and the Objective Reality of Ideas”, The New Scholasticism, 57: 350–371. (Scholar)
• Doyle, John P., 1982, “The Suarezian Proof for God's Existence”, in History of Philosophy in the Making: A Symposium of Essays to Honor Professor James D. Collins on his 65^th Birthday, Linus Thro (ed.), Washington DC: University Press of America, pp. 105–17. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, “Prolegomena to a Study of Extrinsic Denomination in the Work of Francis Suárez, S.J.”, Vivarium, 22: 121–160. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987, “Suárez on Truth and Mind-Dependent Beings: Implications for a Unified Semiotics”, in Semiotics 1983, Jonathan Evans and John Deely (eds), New York: University Press of America, pp. 121–133. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Francisco Suárez on the Law of Nations”, in Religion and International Law, Mark Janis and Carolyn Evans (eds), The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 103–144. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, “Suárez on the Truth of the Proposition, ‘This is my Body’”, Modern Schoolman, 77: 145–163. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez S. J. (1548–1617), Victor Salas (ed.), Leuven: Leuven University Press. (Scholar)
• Dutton, Blake D., 1993, “Suarezian foundations of Descartes' Ontological Argument”, The Modern Schoolman, 70: 245–258. (Scholar)
• Edwards, Michael, 2012, “Suárez in a Late Scholastic Context: Anatomy, Psychology, and Authority”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 25–37. (Scholar)
• Esposito, Constantino, 2001, “The Concept of Time in the Metaphysics of Suárez”, in The Medieval Concept of Time: The Scholastic Debate and Its Reception in Early Modern Philosophy, Pasquale Porro (ed.), Leiden: Brill, pp. 383–98. (Scholar)
• Ferrater Mora, José, 1953, “Suárez and Modern Philosophy”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 14: 528–47. (Scholar)
• Fichter, Joseph H., 1940, Man of Spain: Francisco Suárez, New York: Macmillian. (Scholar)
• Finnis, John. M, 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Forlivesi, Marco, 2006, “Impure Ontology. The Nature of Metaphysics and Its Object in Francisco Suarez's Texts”, Quaestio, 5(2005): 559–586. (Scholar)
• Freddoso, Alfred J., 1991, “God's General Concurrence with Secondary Causes”, Philosophical Perspectives, 5: 553–85. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Introduction”, in Francisco Suárez, On Creation, Conservation & Concurrence, Alfred J. Freddoso (transl. and ed.), South Bend, IN: St Augustine Press, pp. xix–xx. (Scholar)
• García, Claudia Lorena, 2000, “The Falsity of Non-Judgmental Cognitions in Descartes and Suárez”, Modern Schoolman, 77: 199–216. (Scholar)
• Gordley, James, 2012, “Suárez and Natural Law”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 209–229. (Scholar)
• Gracia, Jorge J. E., 1974, “A Supremely Great Being”, New Scholasticism, 48: 371–377. (Scholar)
• –––, 1979, “What the Individual Adds to the Common Nature According to Suárez”, The New Scholasticism, 53: 221–233. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991a, “Suárez's Conception of Metaphysics: A Step in the Direction of Mentalism?”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 65: 287–309. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991b, “Francisco Suárez: The Man in History”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 65: 259–266. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992a, “The Transcendentals in the Middle Ages: An Introduction”, Topoi, 11: 113–120. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992b, “Suárez and the Doctrine of the Transcendentals”, Topoi, 11: 121–133. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter Reformation (1150–1650), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, Metaphysics and Its Task: The Search for the Categorial Foundation of Knowledge, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “Francisco Suárez: Metaphysical Disputations (1597): from the Middle Ages to Modernity”, in The Classics of Western Philosophy: A Reader, Jorge J.E. Gracia, Gregory M. Reichberg, and Bernard N. Schumacher (eds), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 204–209. (Scholar)
• Gracia, Jorge and Lloyd Newton, 2012, “Medieval Theories of the Categories”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL= <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/medieval-categories/>. (Scholar)
• Gracia, Jorge J.E. and Daniel Novotný, 2012, “Fundamentals in Suárez's Metaphysics: Transcendental and Categories”, in Schwartz 2012a: 19–38. (Scholar)
• Grotius, Hugo, 2001, Briefwisseling, H. J. M. Nellen et al. (eds), V, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (Scholar)
• Haggenmacher, Peter, 1983, Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Scholar)
• Hattab, Helen, 2012, “Suárez Last Stand for the Substantial Form”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 101–120. (Scholar)
• Heider, Daniel, 2007, “Suárez on the Concept of Being. Is Suárez's Concept of Being Analogical or Univocal?”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 81: 21–42. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Suárez on Material Substance. Reification of Intrinsic Principles and the Unity of Material Composites”, Organon F, 15(4): 423–438. [Heider 2008 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2009a, “The Nature of Suárez's Metaphysics: Disputationes Metaphysicae and its Main Systematic Strains”, Studia Neoaristotelica, 6: 99–110. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009b, “The Unity of Suárez Metaphysics”, Medioevo, 34: 475–505. (Scholar)
• Hill, Benjamin and Henrik Lagerlund (eds), 2012, The Philosophy of Suárez, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Hume, David, 1993 [1748], An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Eric Steinberg (ed.), Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett. (Scholar)
• Irwin, Terence. H., 2008, The Development of Ethics, II, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Obligation, Rightness and Natural Law: Suárez and Some Critics”, in Schwartz 2012a: 142–162. (Scholar)
• Iturrioz, Jesús, 1949, “Fuentes de la metafísica de Suárez”, Pensamiento, 4: 31–90. (Scholar)
• Karofsky, Amy, 2001, “Suárez's Influence on Descartes's Theory of Eternal Truths”, Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 10: 241–262. (Scholar)
• Knight, David M., 1962, “Suarez's Approach to Substantial Form”, Modern Schoolman, 39: 219–39. (Scholar)
• Koons, Robert, 1997, “A New Look at the Cosmological Argument”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 192–212. (Scholar)
• Kowalski, Dean, 2003, “On Behalf of Suarezian Middle Knowledge”, Philosophia Christi, 5: 219–27. (Scholar)
• Kronen, J. D., 1991, “Essentialism Old and New: Suárez and Brody”, The Modern Schoolman, 68: 123–151. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, “Substances are not Windowless: a Suarezian Critique of Monadism”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 71: 5–81. (Scholar)
• Leijenhorst, Cees, 2007, “Cajetan and Suárez on Agent Sense: Metaphysics and Epistemology in Late Aristotelian Thought”, in Forming the Mind: Essays on the Internal Senses and the Mind/Body Problem from Avicenna to the Medical Enlightenment, Henrik Lagerlund (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 237–262. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Suárez on Self-Awareness”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 137–153. (Scholar)
• Locke, John, 1976 [1690], An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Peter H. Nidditch (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Martini, Martino, 1998, Opera omnia, II: Opere minori, Giuliano Bertuccioli (ed.), Trent: Università degli studi di Trento. (Scholar)
• May, William E., 1984, “The Natural Law Doctrine of Francis Suárez”, The New Scholasticism, 58: 409–423. (Scholar)
• Mendes, Alfonso, 1692, Bran-Haymanot id est lux fidei in epithalamium aethiopissae, Cologne: Balthazar d'Egmondt & Partners, 1692. (Scholar)
• Miner, Robert C., 2001, “Suárez as Founder of Modernity: Reflections on a “Topos” in Recent Historiography”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 18: 217–36. (Scholar)
• Montag, John, 1999, “Revelation: The False Legacy of Suárez”, in Radical Orthodoxy. A New Theology, London and New York, Routledge, pp. 38–63. (Scholar)
• Mullaney, Thomas, 1948–9, “The Basis of Suarezian Teaching on Human Freedom”, Thomist, 11: 1–17, 330–369, 448–502, 12: 48–94, 155–206. (Scholar)
• Noreña, Carlos G., 1981, “Ockham and Suárez on the Ontological Status of Universal Concepts”, The New Scholasticism, 4: 348–362. (Scholar)
• –––, 1985, “Suárez and Spinoza: The Metaphysics of Modal Being”, Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía, 12: 163–182. (Scholar)
• Novotný, Daniel D., 2009, “In Defence of Baroque Scholasticism”, Studia Neoaristotelica, 6: 209–233. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, “Rubio and Suárez: A Comparative Study on the Nature of Entia Rationis”, in Bohemia Jesuitica, 1556–2006, Petronilla Čemus (ed.), Prague: Karolinum, pp. 447–490. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, Being of Reason: A Study in Scholasticism of the Baroque Era, New York: Fordham University Press. (Scholar)
• Novotný, Daniel and Jorge J.E. Gracia, 2012, “Fundamentals in Suárez's Metaphysics: Transcendental and Categories”, in Schwartz 2012a: 19–38. (Scholar)
• Owens, Joseph, 1957, “The Number of Terms in the Suarezian Discussion on Essence and Being”, Modern Schoolman, 34: 147–91. (Scholar)
• Pasnau, Robert, 1997, Theories of Cognition in the Late Middle Ages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Form, Substance, and Mechanism”, Philosophical Review, 113: 31–88. (Scholar)
• Peccorini, Francisco, 1974, “Knowledge of the Singular: Aquinas, Suárez, and Recent Intepreters”, Thomist, 38: 606–55. (Scholar)
• Penner, Sydney, 2013a, “Suárez on the Reduction of Categorical Relations”, Philosophers' Imprint, 13: 1–24. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013b, “Free and Rational: Suárez on the Will”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 95: 1–35. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming, “Suárez on Final Causation”, in For Suárezian Causes, Jakob Leth Fink (ed.). (Scholar)
• Pereira, José, 1999, “The Achievement of Suárez and the Suarezianization of Thomism”, in Francisco Suárez (1548–1617), tradição e modernidade, Adelino Cardoso et al. (eds), Lisbon: Colibri—Centro de filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa, pp. 133–156. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, Suárez: Between Scholasticism & Modernity, Marquette, WI: Marquette University Press. (Scholar)
• Pink, Thomas, 2005, “Action, Will, and Law in Late Scholasticism”, in Moral Philosophy on the Threshold of Modernity, J. Kraye and R. Saarinen (eds), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 31–50. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012a, “Action and Freedom in Suárez's Ethics”, in Schwartz 2012a: 115–141. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012b, “Reason and Obligation in Suárez”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 175–208. (Scholar)
• Reichberg, Gregory, 2012, “Suárez on Just War”, in Schwartz 2012a: 184–204. (Scholar)
• Reichberg, Gregory M., Henrik Syse, and Endre Begby, 2006, The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
• Ross, James, 1962, “Suárez on Universals”, Journal of Philosophy, 59: 736–47. (Scholar)
• Rozemond, Marleen, 2012, “Unity and Multiplicity in Suárez's Soul”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 154–174. (Scholar)
• Sgarbi, Marco, 2010, Francisco Suárez and His Legacy: The Impact of Suárezian Metaphysics and Epistemology on Modern Philosophy, Milan: Vita e Pensiero. (Scholar)
• Schwartz, Daniel, 2008, “Francisco Suárez on Consent and Political Obligation”, Vivarium, 48: 59–81. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2012a, Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012b, “Introduction”, in Schwartz 2012a: 1–18. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012c, “Suárez on Distributive Justice”, in Schwartz 2012a: 163–184. (Scholar)
• Scorraille, Raoul de, 1914, François Suarez de la Compagnie de Jesus, 2 vols., Paris: Lethielléux. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, Francisco Suárez de la Compañía de Jesús, según sus cartas, sus demás escritos inéditos y crecido número de documentos nuevos, Pamplona: Analecta. (Scholar)
• Secada, Jorge, 2012, “Suárez on the Ontology of Relations”, in Schwartz 2012a: 62–88. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Suárez on Continuous Quantity”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 75–88. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming, “Suárez's Nominalist Master Argument: Metaphysical Disputations V, 1”, in Proceedings of the Conference on Suárez's Metaphysics: Disputationes metaphysicae in Their Historical and Systematic Context, David Heider and David Svoboda (eds). (Scholar)
• Shields, Christopher, 2012a, “Shadows of Beings”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 57–74. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012b, “The Reality of Substantial Form: Suárez, Metaphysical Disputations XV”, in Schwartz 2012a: 39–61. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012c, “The Unity of Soul in Suárez”, in De Anima Acta, R. Friedman (ed.), Leiden: Brill, pp. 355–378. (Scholar)
• Sommerville, Johann P., 1982, “From Suárez to Filmer. A Reappraisal”, Historical Journal, 25: 525–540. (Scholar)
• South, James B., 2001a, “Suárez on Imagination”, Vivarium, 39: 119–158. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001b, “Suárez and the Problem of External Sensation”, Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 10: 217–240. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Singular and Universal in Suárez's Account of Cognition”, Review of Metaphysics, 55: 785–823. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Suárez, Immortality, and the Soul's Dependence on the Body”, in Hill and Lagerlund 2012: 121–136. (Scholar)
• Spruit, Leen, 1995, Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge-Classical Roots and Medieval Discussions, II, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Svoboda, David, 2007, “Francisco Suárez on the Addition of the One to Being and the Priority of the One over the Many”, Studia Neoaristotelica, 4: 158–172. (Scholar)
• Thiel, Udo, 1998, “Individuation”, in Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy, Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers (eds), New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–262. (Scholar)
• Vázquez, Gabriel, 1608, Commentariorum ac disputationum in I–II, I, Venice: Evangelista Deuchino. (Scholar)
• Vieira, Mónica Brito, 2008, “Francisco Suárez and the Principatus Politicus”, History of Political Thought, 29: 273–94. (Scholar)
• Wells, Norman J., 1981, “Suárez on the Eternal Truths”, The Modern Schoolman, 58: 73–104, 159–174. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, “Material Falsity in Descartes, Arnauld and Suárez”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 22: 25–50. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Objective Reality of Ideas in Descartes, Caterus and Suárez”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 28: 33–61. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, “Esse cognitum and Suárez Revisited”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 67: 339–348. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, “Suárez and a Salamancan Thomist: A Tale of a Text”, in Hispanic Philosophy in the Age of Discovery, Kevin White (ed.), Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, pp. 201–225. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998a, “Suarez on Material Falsity”, in Meeting of the Minds. The Relations between Medieval and Classical Modern European Philosophy, Stephen F. Brown (ed.), Turnhout : Brepols, pp. 1–26. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998b, “Descartes and Suárez on Secondary Qualities. A Tale of Two Readings”, Review of Metaphysics, 51: 565–604. (Scholar)
• Westermann, Pauline C., 2007, “Suárez and the Formality of Law”, in Politische Metaphysik. Die Entstehung moderner Rechtskonzeptionen in der Spanischen Scholastik, Matthias Kaufmann and Robert Schnepf (ed.), Frankfurt: Lang pp. 227–237. (Scholar)
• Wilenius, Reijo,1963, The Social and Political Theory of Francisco Suárez, Acta Philosophica Fennica15, Hensinski: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Kirjapaino. (Scholar)