Primary Sources: Works by Tarski

• Tarski, A., 1931. “Sur les ensembles définissables de nombres réels. I.”, Fundamenta Mathematicae, 17: 210–239. (Scholar)
• –––, 1933. Pojęcie prawdy w językach nauk dedukcyjnych, Warsaw: Nakładem Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego. (Scholar)
• –––, 1935. “Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen”, Studia Philosophica, 1: 261–405. Translation of Tarski 1933 by L. Blaustein, with a postscript added. (Scholar)
• –––, 1936a. “O pojęciu wynikania logicznego”, Przegląd Filozoficzny, 39: 58–68.
• –––, 1936b. “Über den Begriff der logischen Folgerung”, in Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique, fasc. 7 (Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, vol. 394), Paris: Hermann et Cie, pp. 1–11. (Scholar)
• –––, 1937. Einführung in die mathematische Logik und in die Methodologie der Mathematik. Vienna: Julius Springer. (Translated with additions as Tarski 1941.) (Scholar)
• –––, 1941. Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Science, translation of Tarski 1937 by O. Helmer, with additions. New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1944. “The Semantic Conception of Truth: And the Foundations of Semantics”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4: 341–376. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983a. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, second edition, ed. by J. Corcoran. Indianapolis: Hackett. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983b. “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages”, translation of Tarski 1935 by J.H. Woodger in Tarski 1983a, pp. 152–278. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983c. “On the Concept of Logical Consequence”, translation of Tarski 1936b by J.H. Woodger in Tarski 1983a, pp. 409–20. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983d. “On Definable Sets of Real Numbers”, translation of Tarski 1931 by J.H. Woodger in Tarski 1983a, pp. 110–142. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986a. “What Are Logical Notions?”, ed. by J. Corcoran. History and Philosophy of Logic, 7: 143–54. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986b. Collected Papers, four volumes, ed. by S. Givant and R. McKenzie. Basel: Birkhäuser. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987. “A Philosophical Letter of Alfred Tarski”, Journal of Philosophy, 84: 28–32. A 1944 letter of Tarski to Morton White, published with a preface of the latter. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002. “On the Concept of Following Logically”, translation of Tarski 1936a by M. Stroińska and D. Hitchcock. History and Philosophy of Logic, 23: 155–96. (Scholar)
• –––, and S. Givant, 1987. A Formalization of Set Theory without Variables, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. (Scholar)
• –––, and A. Lindenbaum, 1935. “Über die Beschränktheit der Ausdrucksmittel deduktiver Theorien”, in Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, fasc. 7, 1934–1935, pp. 15–22. (Translated as Tarski and Lindenbaum 1983.) (Scholar)
• –––, and A. Lindenbaum, 1983. “On the Limitations of the Means of Expression of Deductive Theories”, translation of Tarski and Lindenbaum 1935 by J.H. Woodger in Tarski 1983a, pp. 384–392. (Scholar)

Secondary Sources

• Asay, J., 2013. “Tarski and Primitivism about Truth”, Philosophers’ Imprint, 13: 1–18. (Scholar)
• Azzouni, J., 2005. “Tarski, Quine, and the Transcendence of the Vernacular ‘True’”, Synthese, 142: 273–88. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Alternative Logics and the Role of Truth in the Interpretation of Languages”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 390–429. (Scholar)
• Barnard, R. and J. Ulatowski, 2016. “Tarski’s 1944 Polemical Remarks and Naess’ ‘Experimental Philosophy’”, Erkenntnis, 81: 457–477. (Scholar)
• Bays, T., 2001. “On Tarski on Models”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 66: 1701–26. (Scholar)
• Bellotti, L., 2003. “Tarski on Logical Notions”, Synthese, 135: 401–13. (Scholar)
• Betti, A., 2008. “Polish Axiomatics and its Truth: On Tarski’s Leśniewskian Background and the Ajdukiewicz Connection”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 44–71. (Scholar)
• Blackburn, S., 2018. Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Blanchette, P., 2000. “Models and Modality”, Synthese, 124: 45–72. (Scholar)
• Bonnay, D., 2008. “Logicality and Invariance”, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 14: 29–68. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014. “Logical Constants, or How to Use Invariance in Order to Complete the Explication of Logical Consequence”, Philosophy Compass, 9: 54–65. (Scholar)
• Bonnay, D. and S. Speitel, 2021. “The Ways of Logicality: Invariance and Categoricity”, in Sagi and Woods 2021, pp. 55–79. (Scholar)
• Burgess, J.P., 2008. “Tarski’s Tort”, in Burgess, Mathematics, Models, and Modality. Selected Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–68. (Scholar)
• Burgess, A.G. and J.P. Burgess, 2011. Truth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Casanovas, E., 2007. “Logical Operations and Invariance”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 36: 33–60. (Scholar)
• Chihara, C., 1998. “Tarski’s Thesis and the Ontology of Mathematics”, in M. Schirn (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics Today, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 157–72. (Scholar)
• Church, A., 1976. “Comparison of Russell’s Resolution of the Semantical Antinomies with That of Tarski”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 41: 747–60. (Scholar)
• Coffa, J.A., 1991. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• David, M., 2008. “Tarski’s Convention T and the Concept of Truth”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 133–56. (Scholar)
• Davidson, D., 1973. “In Defence of Convention T”, reprinted in Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, New York: Oxford University Press, 1984, pp. 65–75. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990. “The Structure and Content of Truth”, Journal of Philosophy, 87: 279–328. (Scholar)
• DeVidi, D. and G. Solomon, 1999. “Tarski on ‘Essentially Richer’ Metalanguages”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 28: 1–28. (Scholar)
• Dutilh Novaes, C., 2014. “The Undergeneration of Permutation Invariance as a Criterion for Logicality”, Erkenntnis, 79: 81–97. (Scholar)
• Eastaugh, B., 2017. “Tarski”, in A. Malpass and M. Antonutti Marfori (eds.), The History of Philosophical and Formal Logic: From Aristotle to Tarski, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 293–313. (Scholar)
• Edwards, J., 2003. “Reduction and Tarski’s Definition of Logical Consequence”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 44: 49–62. (Scholar)
• Eklund, M., 2002. “A Vindication of Tarski’s Claims about the Liar Paradox”, in T. Childers (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2001, Prague: Filosofia, pp. 49–55. (Scholar)
• Etchemendy, J., 1988. “Tarski on Truth and Logical Consequence”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 53: 51–79. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990. The Concept of Logical Consequence, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Reflections on Consequence”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 263–99. (Scholar)
• Feferman, S., 1999. “Logic, Logics, and Logicism”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 40: 31–54. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004a. “Tarski’s Conceptual Analysis of Semantical Notions”, in A. Benmakhlouf (ed.), Sémantique et Épistemologie, Casablanca-Paris: Le Fennec-Vrin, pp. 79–108. Reprinted in Patterson 2008a, pp. 72–93. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004b. “Tarski’s Conception of Logic”, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 126: 5–13. (Scholar)
• Feferman, A.B. and S. Feferman, 2004. Alfred Tarski. Life and Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Field, H., 1972. “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”, reprinted in Field, Truth and the Absence of Fact, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 3–26. (Scholar)
• Frost-Arnold, G., 2004. “Was Tarski’s Theory of Truth Motivated by Physicalism?”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 25: 265–80. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Tarski’s Nominalism”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 225–46. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013. Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard. Conversations on Logic, Mathematics, and Science, Chicago: Open Court. (Scholar)
• García-Carpintero, M., 1996. “What Is a Tarskian Definition of Truth?”, Philosophical Studies, 82: 113–44. (Scholar)
• Givant, S., 1986. “Bibliography of Alfred Tarski”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 51: 913–41. (Scholar)
• Gómez-Torrente, M., 1996. “Tarski on Logical Consequence”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 37: 125–51. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998/9. “Logical Truth and Tarskian Logical Truth”, Synthese, 117: 375–408. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001. “Notas sobre el Wahrheitsbegriff”, parts I and II. Análisis Filosófico, 21: 5–41, 149–85. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002. “The Problem of Logical Constants”, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 8: 1–37. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004. “The Indefinability of Truth in the ‘Wahrheitsbegriff’”, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 126: 27–37. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Are There Model-Theoretic Logical Truths that are not Logically True?”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 340–68. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009. “Rereading Tarski on Logical Consequence”, Review of Symbolic Logic, 2: 249–97. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019. “Soames on the Logical Empiricists on Truth, Meaning, Convention, and Logical Truth”, Philosophical Studies, 176: 1357–65. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021. “The Problem of Logical Constants and the Semantic Tradition: From Invariantist Views to a Pragmatic Account”, in Sagi and Woods 2021, pp. 35–54. (Scholar)
• Griffiths, O. and A.C. Paseau, 2022. One True Logic: A Monist Manifesto, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Gruber, M., 2016. Alfred Tarski and the “Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages”. A Running Commentary with Consideration of the Polish Original and the German Translation, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
• Gupta, A., 2002. “An Argument against Tarski’s Convention T”, in R. Schantz (ed.), What Is Truth?, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 225–37. (Scholar)
• Hanson, W., 1997. “The Concept of Logical Consequence”, Philosophical Review, 106: 365–409. (Scholar)
• Heck, R., 1997. “Tarski, Truth, and Semantics”, Philosophical Review, 106: 533–54. (Scholar)
• Hintikka, J., 2004. “On Tarski’s Assumptions”, Synthese, 142: 353–69. (Scholar)
• Hodges, W., 1985/6. “Truth in a Structure”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 86: 135–51. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004. “What Languages Have Tarski Truth Definitions?”, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 126: 93–113. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Tarski’s Theory of Definition”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 94–132. (Scholar)
• Horwich, P., 2005. “A Minimalist Critique of Tarski on Truth”, in JC Beall (ed.), Deflationism and Paradox, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 75–84. (Scholar)
• Jané, I., 2006. “What Is Tarski’s Common Concept of Consequence?”, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 12: 1–42. (Scholar)
• Kennedy, J., 2021. Gödel, Tarski and the Lure of Natural Language. Logical Entanglement, Formalism Freeness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Kennedy, J. and J. Väänänen, 2021. “Logicality and Model Classes”, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 27: 385–414. (Scholar)
• Ketland, J., 1999. “Deflationism and Tarski’s Paradise”, Mind, 108: 69–94. (Scholar)
• Kirkham, R., 1992. Theories of Truth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Kneale, W. and M. Kneale, 1962. The Development of Logic, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Kripke, S., 1975. “Outline of a Theory of Truth”, Journal of Philosophy, 72: 690–716. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019. “Ungroundedness in Tarskian Languages”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48: 603–9. (Scholar)
• Künne, W., 2003. Conceptions of Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Loeb, I., 2014. “Towards Transfinite Type Theory: Rereading Tarski’s Wahrheitsbegriff”, Synthese, 191: 2281–99. (Scholar)
• McFarland, A., J. McFarland, and J. T. Smith (eds.), 2014. Alfred Tarski. Early Work in Poland – Geometry and Teaching, New York: Birkhäuser. (Scholar)
• McGee, V., 1992. “Two Problems with Tarski’s Theory of Consequence”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 92: 273–92. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993. “A Semantic Conception of Truth?”, Philosophical Topics, 21: 83–111. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004. “Tarski’s Staggering Existential Assumptions”, Synthese, 142: 371–87. (Scholar)
• Mancosu, P., 2005. “Harvard 1940–1941: Tarski, Carnap and Quine on a Finitistic Language of Mathematics for Science”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 26: 327–57. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006. “Tarski on Models and Logical Consequence”, in J. Ferreirós and J. J. Gray (eds.), The Architecture of Modern Mathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–37. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Tarski, Neurath, and Kokoszyńska on the Semantic Conception of Truth”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 192–224. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009. “Tarski’s Engagement with Philosophy”, in S. Lapointe et al, (eds.), The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 131–53. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010. “Fixed- Versus Variable-Domain Interpretations of Tarski’s Account of Logical Consequence”, Philosophy Compass, 5: 745–759. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021. “Logic and Biology: The Correspondence Between Alfred Tarski and Joseph H. Woodger”, Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 11: 18–105. doi:10.5642/jhummath.202102.04 (Scholar)
• Milne, P., 1999. “Tarski, Truth and Model Theory”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99: 141–67. (Scholar)
• Murawski, R., 1998. “Undefinability of Truth. The Problem of Priority: Tarski vs. Gödel”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 19: 153–60. (Scholar)
• Mycielski, J., 2004. “On the Tension between Tarski’s Nominalism and His Model Theory”, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 126: 215–24. (Scholar)
• Park, W., 2018. Philosophy’s Loss of Logic to Mathematics. An Inadequately Understood Take-Over, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
• Patterson, D., 2004. “The Status of Convention T”, in L. Běhounek (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2003, Prague: Filosofia, pp. 195–207. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2008a. New Essays on Tarski and Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008b. “Tarski’s Conception of Meaning”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 157–91. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012. Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Putnam, H., 1985. “A Comparison of Something with Something Else”, reprinted in Putnam, Words and Life, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994, pp. 330–50. (Scholar)
• Raatikainen, P., 2003. “More on Putnam and Tarski”, Synthese, 135: 37–47. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Truth, Meaning, and Translation”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 247–62. (Scholar)
• Ray, G., 1996. “Logical Consequence: a Defense of Tarski”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25: 617–77. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003. “Tarski and the Metalinguistic Liar”, Philosophical Studies, 115: 55–80. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005. “On the Matter of Essential Richness”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 34: 433–57. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018. “Tarski on the Concept of Truth”, in M. Glanzberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 695–717. (Scholar)
• Rojszczak, A., 2002. “Philosophical Background and Philosophical Content of the Semantic Definition of Truth”, Erkenntnis, 56: 29–62. (Scholar)
• Sagi, G., 2015. “The Modal and Epistemic Arguments against the Invariance Criterion for Logical Terms”, Journal of Philosophy, 112: 159–67. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018. “Logicality and Meaning”, Review of Symbolic Logic, 11: 133–59. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021. “Extensionality and Logicality”, Synthese, 198: 1095–1119. (Scholar)
• Sagi, G. and J. Woods (eds.), 2021. The Semantic Conception of Logic. Essays on Consequence, Invariance, and Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Sagüillo, J.M., 1997. “Logical Consequence Revisited”, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 3: 216–241. (Scholar)
• Schiemer, G. and E. Reck, 2013. “Logic in the 1930s: Type Theory and Model Theory”, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 19: 433–72. (Scholar)
• Schurz, G., 1999. “Tarski and Carnap on Logical Truth. Or: What is Genuine Logic?”, in Woleński and Köhler 1999, pp. 77–94. (Scholar)
• Shapiro, S., 1998. “Logical Consequence: Models and Modality”, in M. Schirn (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics Today, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 131–56. (Scholar)
• Sher, G., 1991. The Bounds of Logic, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996. “Did Tarski Commit ‘Tarski’s Fallacy’?”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 61: 653–86. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999. “What Is Tarski’s Theory of Truth?”, Topoi, 59: 149–66. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Tarski’s Thesis”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 300–39. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021. “Invariance and Logicality in Perspective”, in Sagi and Woods 2021, pp. 13–34. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022. Logical Consequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Simchen, O., 2020. “Modeling Truth for Semantics”, Analytic Philosophy, 61: 28–36. (Scholar)
• Simmons, K., 2009. “Tarski’s Logic”, in D. M. Gabbay and J. Woods (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 5. Logic from Russell to Church, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 511–616. (Scholar)
• Simons, P., 1987. “Bolzano, Tarski and the Limits of Logic”, Philosophia Naturalis, 24: 378–405. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Truth on a Tight Budget: Tarski and Nominalism”, in Patterson 2008a, pp. 369–89. (Scholar)
• Sinaceur, H., 2001. “Alfred Tarski: Semantic Shift, Heuristic Shift in Metamathematics”, Synthese, 126: 49–65. (Scholar)
• Smith, N. J. J., 2017. “Truth via Satisfaction?”, in P. Arazim and T. Lávička (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2016, London: College Publications, pp. 273–287. (Scholar)
• Soames, S., 1984. “What Is a Theory of Truth?”, Journal of Philosophy, 81: 411–29. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999. Understanding Truth, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010. Philosophy of Language, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018. The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy. Volume 2. A New Vision, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Sundholm, G., 2003. “Tarski and Leśniewski on Languages with Meaning versus Languages without Use”, in J. Hintikka et al. (eds.), Philosophy and Logic. In Search of the Polish Tradition, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 109–28. (Scholar)
• Suppes, P., 1988. “Philosophical Implications of Tarski’s Work”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 53: 80–91. (Scholar)
• Vaught, R. L., 1974. “Model Theory before 1945”, in L. Henkin et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. XXV, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 153–72. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986. “Tarski’s Work in Model Theory”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 51: 869–82. (Scholar)
• Woleński, J., 1993. “Tarski as a Philosopher”, in F. Coniglione et al. (eds.), Polish Scientific Philosophy: The Lvov-Warsaw School, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 319–38. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999. Essays in the History of Logic and Logical Philosophy, Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019. Semantics and Truth, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
• Woleński, J. and E. Köhler (eds.), 1999. Alfred Tarski and the Vienna Circle, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
• Zinke, A., 2018. The Metaphysics of Logical Consequence, Frankfurt: Klostermann. (Scholar)