• Adams, Rachel, 2021, “Can artificial intelligence be decolonized?”, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 46(1–2): 176–197. doi: 10.1080/03080188.2020.1840225. (Scholar)
• Agricola, Georgius, 1556 [1912], De re metallica, Translated and edited by Herbert Clark Hoover and Lou Henry Hoover, London: The Mining Magazine, 1912. [Agricola 1556 [1912] available online] (Scholar)
• Akrich, Madeleine, 1992, “The Description of Technical Objects”, in Bijker and Law (eds) 1992: 205–224. (Scholar)
• Allhoff, Fritz, Patrick Lin, James H. Moor and John Weckert (eds), 2007, Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience. (Scholar)
• Anders, Günther, 1956, Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen (Volume I: Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution; Volume II: Über die Zerstörung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten industriellen Revolution), München: C.H. Beck. (Scholar)
• Arendt, Hannah, 1958, The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Ariew, Andrew, Robert Cummins and Mark Perlman (eds), 2002, Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Aristotle, Physics, Translated in The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume 1, The Revised Oxford Translation 2014, edited by Jonathan Barnes. (Scholar)
• Bacon, Francis, 1627, New Atlantis: A Worke Vnfinished, in his Sylva Sylvarum: or a Naturall Historie, in Ten Centuries, London: William Lee. (Scholar)
• Baum, Robert J., 1980, Ethics and Engineering Curricula, Hastings-on-Hudson: The Hastings Center. (Scholar)
• Beauchamp, Tom L., 2003, “The Nature of Applied Ethics”, in Frey and Wellman (eds) 2003: 1–16. doi:10.1002/9780470996621.ch1">10.1002/9780470996621.ch1 (Scholar)
• Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress, 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, fifth edition, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Bechtel, William, 1985, “Attributing Responsibility to Computer Systems”, Metaphilosophy, 16(4): 296–306. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00176.x (Scholar)
• Bijker, Wiebe E., and John Law (eds), 1992, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Bimber, Bruce, 1990, “Karl Marx and the Three Faces of Technological Determinism”, Social Studies of Science, 20(2): 333–351. doi:10.1177/030631290020002006 (Scholar)
• Borgmann, Albert, 1984, Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Bostrom, Nick, and Eliezer Yudkowsky, 2014, “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence”, in The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, edited by Keith Frankish and William M Ramsey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 316–334. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139046855.020 (Scholar)
• Brey, Philip A.E., 2012, “Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies”, NanoEthics, 6(1): 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11569-012-0141-7 (Scholar)
• Briffault, R., 1930, Rational Evolution (The Making of Humanity), New York: The Macmillan Company. (Scholar)
• Bucciarelli, Louis L., 1994, Designing Engineers, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Bunge, Mario, 1966, “Technology as Applied Science”, Technology and Culture, 7(3): 329–347. doi:10.2307/3101932 (Scholar)
• Butler, Samuel, 1872, Erewhon, London: Trubner and Co. [Butler 1872 available online] (Scholar)
• Callon, Michel, 1986, “The Sociology of an Actor-Network: the Case of the Electric Vehicle”, in Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, Michel Callon, John Law and Arie Rip (eds.), London: Macmillan, pp. 19–34. (Scholar)
• Caney, Simon, 2014, “Two Kinds of Climate Justice: Avoiding Harm and Sharing Burdens”, Journal of Political Philosophy 22(2): 125–149. doi:10.1111/jopp.12030 (Scholar)
• Coeckelbergh, Mark, 2014, “The Moral Standing of Machines: Towards a Relational and Non-Cartesian Moral Hermeneutics”, Philosophy & Technology 27(1): 61–77. doi: 10.1007/s13347-013-0133-8. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020a, Introduction to Philosophy of Technology, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020b, AI Ethics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022, The Political Philosophy of AI: An Introduction, Cambridge: Polity. (Scholar)
• Cranor, Carl F., 1990, “Some Moral Issues in Risk Assessment”, Ethics, 101(1): 123–143. doi:10.1086/293263 (Scholar)
• Danaher, John, 2016, “Robots, Law and the Retribution Gap”, Ethics and Information Technology 18(4): 299–309. doi: 10.1007/s10676-016-9403-3. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, “Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism”, Science and Engineering Ethics 26(4): 2023–2049. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00119-x. (Scholar)
• Darwin, Charles R., 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, London: John Murray. (Scholar)
• Davis, Michael, 1998, Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, Engineering Ethics, Aldershot/Burlington, VT: Ashgate. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “‘Ain’t No One Here But Us Social Forces’: Constructing the Professional Responsibility of Engineers”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1): 13–34. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9225-3 (Scholar)
• Dennett, Daniel C., 1997, “When HAL kills, who’s to blame? Computer ethics”, in HAL’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality, edited by David G. Stork. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 351–365. (Scholar)
• Di Nucci, Ezio, and Filippo Santoni de Sio, 2016, Drones and Responsibility: Legal, Philosophical and Socio-Technical Perspectives on Remotely Controlled Weapons, Milton Park: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Diels, Hermann, 1903, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Berlin: Weidmann. (Scholar)
• Dipert, Randall R., 1993, Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
• Doorn, Neelke, 2010, “A Rawlsian Approach to Distribute Responsibilities in Networks”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(2): 221–249. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9155-0 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1): 69–90. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9189-3 (Scholar)
• Ellul, Jacques, 1954 [1964], La technique ou L’enjeu du siècle, Paris: Armand Colin. Translated as The Technological Society, by John Wilkinson, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964. (Scholar)
• Erlandson, Robert F., 2008, Universal and Accessible Design for Products, Services, and Processes, Boca Raton, LA: CRC Press. (Scholar)
• Feenberg, Andrew, 1999, Questioning Technology, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Finnis, John, Joseph Boyle and Germain Grisez, 1988, Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Floridi, Luciano, 2010, The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511845239 (Scholar)
• Floridi, Luciano, and J.W. Sanders, 2004, “On the Morality of Artificial Agents”, Minds and Machines, 14(3): 349–379. doi:10.1023/b:mind.0000035461.63578.9d (Scholar)
• Fox, Warwick, 2000, Ethics and the Built Environment, (Professional Ethics), London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Franssen, Maarten, 2005, “Arrow’s Theorem, Multi-Criteria Decision Problems and Multi-Attribute Preferences in Engineering Design”, Research in Engineering Design, 16(1–2): 42–56. doi:10.1007/s00163-004-0057-5 (Scholar)
• Franssen, Maarten, and Louis L. Bucciarelli, 2004, “On Rationality in Engineering Design”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 126(6): 945–949. doi:10.1115/1.1803850 (Scholar)
• Franssen, Maarten, and Stefan Koller, 2016, “Philosophy of Technology as a Serious Branch of Philosophy: The Empirical Turn as a Starting Point”, in Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn, edited by Maarten Franssen, Pieter E. Vermaas, Peter Kroes, and Anthonie W.M. Meijers, Cham: Springer, 31–61. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33717-3_3 (Scholar)
• Franssen, Maarten, Peter Kroes, Thomas A.C. Reydon and Pieter E. Vermaas (eds), 2014, Artefact Kinds: Ontology and the Human-Made World, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00801-1 (Scholar)
• Fraser, Nancy, and Axel Honneth, 2003, Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London and New York: Verso. (Scholar)
• Freeman, K., 1948, Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers (A complete translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Frey, R. G., and Christopher Heath Wellman (eds), 2003, A Companion to Applied Ethics, Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470996621 (Scholar)
• Friedman, Batya, and David Hendry, 2019, Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Garson, Justin, 2016, A Critical Overview of Biological Functions, (SpringerBriefs in Philosophy), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32020-5. (Scholar)
• Gehlen, Arnold, 1957, Die Seele im technischen Zeitalter, Hamburg: Rowohlt. Translated as Man in the Age of Technology, by Patricia Lipscomb, New York: Columbia University Press, 1980. (Scholar)
• Gunkel, David J., 2018, Robot Rights, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1968 [1970], “Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’” in an an anthology of the same name, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag. Translated as “Technology and Science as ‘Ideology’”, in Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, by Jeremy J. Shapiro, Boston, MA: Beacon Press, pp. 81–122. (Scholar)
• Hansson, Sven Ove, 2003, “Ethical Criteria of Risk Acceptance”, Erkenntnis, 59(3): 291–309. doi:10.1023/a:1026005915919 (Scholar)
• –––, 2004a, “Fallacies of Risk”, Journal of Risk Research, 7(3): 353–360. doi:10.1080/1366987042000176262 (Scholar)
• –––, 2004b, “Philosophical Perspectives on Risk”, Techné, 8(1): 10–35. doi:10.5840/techne2004818 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Philosophical Problems in Cost-Benefit Analysis”, Economics and Philosophy, 23(2): 163–183. doi:10.1017/s0266267107001356 (Scholar)
• Harris, Charles E., Michael S. Pritchard and Michael J. Rabins, 2014, Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, fifth edition, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (Scholar)
• Heidegger, Martin, 1954 [1977], “Die Frage nach der Technik”, in Vorträge und Aufsätze, Pfullingen: Günther Neske. Translated as “The Question concerning Technology”, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, by William Lovitt, New York: Harper and Row, 1977, pp. 3–35. (Scholar)
• Herkert, Joseph R., 2001, “Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3): 403–414. doi:10.1007/s11948-001-0062-2 (Scholar)
• Hilpinen, Risto, 1992, “Artifacts and Works of Art”, Theoria, 58(1): 58–82. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1992.tb01155.x (Scholar)
• Holt, Raymond, and Catherine Barnes, 2010, “Towards an Integrated Approach to ‘Design for X’: An Agenda for Decision-Based DFX Research”, Research in Engineering Design, 21(2): 123–136. doi:10.1007/s00163-009-0081-6 (Scholar)
• Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno, 1947 [2002], Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente, Amsterdam: Querido Verlag. Translated as Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, by Edmund Jephcott, and edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002. (Scholar)
• Houkes, Wybo, 2009, “The Nature of Technological Knowledge”, in Meijers 2009: 309–350. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50016-1 (Scholar)
• Houkes, Wybo, and Pieter E. Vermaas, 2010, Technical Functions: On the Use and Design of Artefacts, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London /New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3900-2 (Scholar)
• Hughes, Jesse, Peter Kroes, and Sjoerd Zwart, 2007, “A Semantics for Means-End Relations”, Synthese, 158(2): 207–231. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9036-x (Scholar)
• Ihde, Don, 1979, Technics and Praxis, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, Technology and the Lifeworld: from Garden to Earth, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction, New York: Paragon. (Scholar)
• Ihde, Don, and Evan Selinger, 2003, Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
• Illies, Christian, and Anthonie Meijers, 2009, “Artefacts Without Agency”, The Monist, 92(3): 420–440. doi:10.5840/monist200992324 (Scholar)
• Jarvie, Ian C., 1966, “The Social Character of Technological Problems: Comments on Skolimowski’s Paper”, Technology and Culture, 7(3): 384–390. doi:10.2307/3101936 (Scholar)
• Jenkins, Kirsten, Darren McCauley, Raphael Heffron, Hannes Stephan and Robert Rehner, 2016, “Energy Justice: A Conceptual Review”, Energy Research & Social Science 11: 174–182. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 (Scholar)
• Johnson, Deborah G., 2003, “Computer Ethics”, in Frey and Wellman 2003: 608–619. doi:10.1002/9780470996621.ch45 (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Computer Systems: Moral Entities But Not Moral Agents”, Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4): 195–205. doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9111-5 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, Computer Ethics, fourth edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Scholar)
• Johnson, Deborah G., and Thomas M. Powers, 2005, “Computer Systems and Responsibility: A Normative Look at Technological Complexity”, Ethics and Information Technology, 7(2): 99–107. doi:10.1007/s10676-005-4585-0 (Scholar)
• Jonas, Hans, 1979 [1984], Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp; extended English edition The Imperative of Responsibility: in Search of An Ethics for the Technological Age, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1984. (Scholar)
• Kaplan, David M. (ed.), 2004 [2009], Readings in the Philosophy of Technology, Lanham, MD and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, first edition 2004, second revised edition 2009. (Scholar)
• Kapp, Ernst, 1877 [2018], Grundlinien Einer Philosophie Der Technik: Zur Entstehungsgeschichte Der Cultur Aus Neuen Gesichtspunkten, Braunschweig: Westermann [Kapp 1877 available online]. Translated as Elements of a Philosophy of Technology: On the Evolutionary History of Culture, by Lauren K. Wolfe, and edited by Jeffrey West Kirkwood and Leif Weatherby, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2018. (Scholar)
• Kitcher, Philip, 2001, Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. The Ethical Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Klenk, Michael, 2021, “How Do Technological Artefacts Embody Moral Values?”, Philosophy & Technology 34(3): 525–544. doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y. (Scholar)
• Kneese, Allen V., Shaul Ben-David and William D. Schulze, 1983, “The Ethical Foundations of Benefit-Cost Analysis”, in Energy and the Future, edited by Douglas E. MacLean and Peter G. Brown, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littefield, pp. 59–74. (Scholar)
• Kotarbinski, Tadeusz, 1965, Praxiology: An Introduction to the Sciences of Efficient Action, Oxford: Pergamon Press. (Scholar)
• Kroes, Peter, 2012, Technical Artefacts: Creations of Mind and Matter, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3940-6 (Scholar)
• Kroes, Peter, and Anthonie Meijers (eds), 2006, “The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts”, Special issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37(1): 1–158. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.12.001 (Scholar)
• Kroes, Peter, Maarten Franssen and Louis Bucciarelli, 2009, “Rationality in Design”, in Meijers (ed.) 2009: 565–600. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50025-2 (Scholar)
• Kroes, Peter, and Peter-Paul Verbeek (eds), 2014, The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts, Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3 (Scholar)
• Kuhn, Thomas S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Ladd, John, 1991, “Bhopal: An Essay on Moral Responsibility and Civic Virtue”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 22(1): 73–91. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1991.tb00022.x (Scholar)
• Latour, Bruno, 1992, “Where Are the Missing Masses?”, in Bijker and Law (eds) 1992: 225–258. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, We Have Never Been Modern, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Lawson, Clive, 2008, “An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions”, Technè, 12(1): 48–64. doi:10.5840/techne200812114 (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, Technology and Isolation, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316848319 (Scholar)
• Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney and Ryan Jenkins (eds), 2017, Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Lloyd, G.E.R., 1973, “Analogy in Early Greek Thought”, in The Dictionary of the History of Ideas, edited by Philip P. Wiener, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, vol. 1 pp. 60–64. [Lloyd 1973 available online] (Scholar)
• Lloyd, Peter A., and Jerry A. Busby, 2003, “‘Things that Went Well—No Serious Injuries or Deaths’: Ethical Reasoning in a Normal Engineering Design Process”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4): 503–516. doi:10.1007/s11948-003-0047-4 (Scholar)
• Longino, Helen, 1990, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Maheshwari, Kritika, and Sven Nyholm, 2022, “Dominating Risk Impositions”, The Journal of Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10892-022-09407-4. (Scholar)
• Mahner, Martin, and Mario Bunge, 2001, “Function and Functionalism: A Synthetic Perspective”, Philosophy of Science, 68(1): 73–94. doi:10.1086/392867 (Scholar)
• Marcuse, Herbert, 1964, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, New York: Beacon Press, and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Martin, Miles W., and Roland Schinzinger, 2022, Ethics in Engineering, fifth edition, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. (Scholar)
• Matthias, Andreas, 2004, “The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata”, Ethics and Information Technology 6(3): 175–183. doi: 10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1. (Scholar)
• McGinn, Robert E., 2010, “What’s Different, Ethically, About Nanotechnology? Foundational Questions and Answers”, NanoEthics, 4(2): 115–128. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0089-4 (Scholar)
• Meijers, Anthonie (ed.), 2009, Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, volume 9), Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Scholar)
• Michelfelder, Diane P., and Neelke Doorn (eds), 2021, The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering, New York and Milton Park, UK: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Miller, Boaz, 2020, “Is Technology Value-Neutral?”, Science, Technology & Human Values 46(1): 53–80. doi: 10.1177/0162243919900965. (Scholar)
• Millikan, Ruth Garrett, 1999, “Wings, Spoons, Pills, and Quills: A Pluralist Theory of Function”, The Journal of Philosophy, 96(4): 191–206. doi:10.5840/jphil199996428 (Scholar)
• Mitcham, Carl, 1994, Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter and Luciano Floridi, 2016, “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate”, Big Data & Society, 3(2): 1–21. doi:10.1177/2053951716679679 (Scholar)
• Moor, James H., 1985, “What is Computer Ethics?” Metaphilosophy, 16(4): 266–275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4): 18–21. doi:10.1109/mis.2006.80 (Scholar)
• Mosakas, Kestutis, 2021, “On the Moral Status of Social Robots: Considering the Consciousness Criterion”, AI & Society 36(2): 429–443. doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-01002-1. (Scholar)
• Mumford, Lewis, 1934, Technics and Civilization, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Newman, William R., 2004, Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Niiniluoto, Ilkka, 1993, “The Aim and Structure of Applied Research”, Erkenntnis, 38(1): 1–21. doi:10.1007/bf01129020 (Scholar)
• Nissenbaum, Helen, 1996, “Accountability in a Computerized Society”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 2(1): 25–42. doi:10.1007/bf02639315 (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life, Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books. (Scholar)
• Nyholm, Sven, 2018, “Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections on Human-Robot Collaborations and Responsibility-Loci”, Science and Engineering Ethics 24(4): 1201–1219. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9943-x. (Scholar)
• Olsen, Jan Kyrre Berg, Evan Selinger and Søren Riis (eds), 2009, New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230227279 (Scholar)
• Owen, Richard, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 2013, Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, Chichester: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118551424 (Scholar)
• Peterson, Martin, 2020, Ethics for Engineers, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Peterson, Martin, and Andreas Spahn, 2011, “Can Technological Artefacts be Moral Agents?” Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3): 411–424. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9241-3 (Scholar)
• Pettit, Philip, 2012, On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, The Seeley lectures, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Pitt, Joseph C., 1999, Thinking About Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology, New York: Seven Bridges Press. (Scholar)
• Plato, Laws, 2016, M. Schofield (ed.), T. Griffith (tr.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• –––, Timaeus and Critias, 2008, R. Waterfield (tr.), with introduction and notes by A. Gregory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Polanyi, Michael, 1958, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Preston, Beth, 1998, “Why is a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function”, The Journal of Philosophy, 95(5): 215–254. doi:10.2307/2564689 (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “Of Marigold Beer: A Reply to Vermaas and Houkes”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54(4): 601–612. doi:10.1093/bjps/54.4.601 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, A Philosophy of Material Culture: Action, Function, and Mind, New York and Milton Park, UK: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Preston, Christopher J. (ed.), 2016, Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Atmospheric Anthropocene, London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. (Scholar)
• Radder, Hans, 2009, “Why Technologies Are Inherently Normative”, in Meijers (ed.) 2009: 887–921. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50037-9 (Scholar)
• Rawls, John, 1999, A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Roeser, Sabine, 2012, “Moral Emotions as Guide to Acceptable Risk”, in Roeser et al. 2012: 819–832. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_32">10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_32 (Scholar)
• Roeser, Sabine, Rafaela Hillerbrand, Per Sandin and Martin Peterson (eds), 2012, Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5 (Scholar)
• Ryle, Gilbert, 1949, The Concept of Mind, London: Hutchinson. (Scholar)
• Santoni de Sio, Filippo, and Giulio Mecacci, 2021, “Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them”, Philosophy & Technology 34(4): 1057–1084. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00450-x. (Scholar)
• Santoni de Sio, Filippo, and Jeroen van den Hoven, 2018. “Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account”, Frontiers in Robotics and AI. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00015. (Scholar)
• Scharff, Robert C., and Val Dusek (eds), 2003 [2014], Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition, Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell, first edition 2003, second [revised] edition 2014. (Scholar)
• Schummer, Joachim, 2001, “Aristotle on Technology and Nature”, Philosophia Naturalis, 38: 105–120. (Scholar)
• Sclove, Richard E., 1995, Democracy and Technology, New York: The Guilford Press. (Scholar)
• Sellars, Wilfrid, 1962, “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man”, in Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, edited by R. Colodny, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 35–78. (Scholar)
• Sharkey, Amanda, and Noel Sharkey, 2021, “We Need to Talk about Deception in Social Robotics!”, Ethics and Information Technology 23(3): 309–316. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09573-9. (Scholar)
• Sherlock, Richard, and John D. Morrey (eds), 2002, Ethical Issues in Biotechnology, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Shrader-Frechette, Kristen S., 1985, Risk Analysis and Scientific Method: Methodological and Ethical Problems with Evaluating Societal Hazards, Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reform, Berkeley etc.: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Simon, Herbert A., 1957, Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, New York: John Wiley. (Scholar)
• –––, 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1982, Models of Bounded Rationality, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Skolimowski, Henryk, 1966, “The Structure of Thinking in Technology”, Technology and Culture, 7(3): 371–383. doi:10.2307/3101935 (Scholar)
• Snapper, John W., 1985, “Responsibility for Computer-Based Errors”, Metaphilosophy, 16(4): 289–295. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00175.x (Scholar)
• Soavi, Marzia, 2009, “Realism and Artifact Kinds”, in Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Ulrich Krohs and Peter Kroes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 185–202. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262113212.003.0011 (Scholar)
• Sparrow, Robert, 2007, “Killer Robots”, Journal of Applied Philosophy 24(1): 62–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x (Scholar)
• Suh, Nam Pyo, 2001, Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Susskind, Jamie, 2022, The Digital Republic: On Freedom and Democracy in the 21st Century, London: Bloomsbury. (Scholar)
• Swierstra, Tsjalling, and Jaap Jelsma, 2006, “Responsibility Without Moralism in Technoscientific Design Practice”, Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(1): 309–332. doi:10.1177/0162243905285844 (Scholar)
• Swierstra, Tsjalling, and Hedwig te Molder, 2012, “Risk and Soft Impacts”, in Roeser et al. (eds) 2012: 1049–1066. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_42 (Scholar)
• Taebi, Behnam, 2021, Ethics and Engineering: An Introduction, Cambridge Applied Ethics series, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Taebi, Behnam, and Sabine Roeser (eds), 2015, The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice, and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781107294905 (Scholar)
• Tavani, Herman T., 2002, “The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly is at Issue, and Why Does it Matter?” Ethics and Information Technology, 4(1): 37–54. doi:10.1023/a:1015283808882 (Scholar)
• Thomasson, Amie L., 2003, “Realism and Human Kinds”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(3): 580–609. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00309.x (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Artifacts and Human Concepts”, in Creations of the Mind: Essays on Artifacts and Their Representation, edited by Eric Margolis and Stephen Laurence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–73. (Scholar)
• Thompson, Dennis F., 1980, “Moral Responsibility and Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands”, American Political Science Review, 74(4): 905–916. doi:10.2307/1954312 (Scholar)
• Thompson, Paul B., 2007, Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective, second edition, Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-5791-1 (Scholar)
• Vallor, Shannon (ed.), 2022, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• van den Hoven, Jeroen, and John Weckert (eds), 2008, Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• van den Hoven, Jeroen, Pieter E. Vermaas and Ibo van de Poel (eds), 2015, Handbook of Ethics and Values in Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6 (Scholar)
• van de Poel, Ibo, 2009, “Values in Engineering Design”, in Meijers (ed.) 2009: 973–1006. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50040-9 (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(3): 667–686. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9724-3 (Scholar)
• van de Poel, Ibo, and Lambèr Royakkers, 2011, Ethics, Technology and Engineering, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
• van de Poel, Ibo, Lambèr Royakkers and Sjoerd D. Zwart, 2015, Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• van der Pot, Johan Hendrik Jacob, 1985 [1994/2004], Die Bewertung des technischen Fortschritts: eine systematische Übersicht der Theorien, 2 volumes, Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum. Translated as Steward or Sorcerer’s Apprentice? the Evaluation of Technical Progress: A Systematic Overview of Theories and Opinions, by Chris Turner, 2 volumes., Delft: Eburon, 1994, second edition, 2004, under the title Encyclopedia of Technological Progress: A Systematic Overview of Theories and Opinions. (Scholar)
• van Wynsberghe, Aimee, and Scott Robbins, 2019, “Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents”, Science and Engineering Ethics 25(3): 719–735. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8. (Scholar)
• Verbeek, Peter-Paul, 2000 [2005], De daadkracht der Dingen: Over Techniek, Filosofie En Vormgeving, Amsterdam: Boom. Translated as What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design, by Robert P. Crease, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2005. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Vermaas, Pieter E., and Wybo Houkes, 2003, “Ascribing Functions to Technical Artefacts: A Challenge to Etiological Accounts of Functions”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54(2): 261–289. doi:10.1093/bjps/54.2.261 (Scholar)
• Vincenti, Walter A., 1990, What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
• Vitruvius, De architecture, translated as The Ten Books on Architecture, by Morris H. Morgan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914. [Vitruvius Morgan’s translation 1914 available online]
• Volti, Rudi, 2009, Society and Technological Change, sixth edition, New York: Worth Publications. (Scholar)
• Von Wright, Georg Henrik, 1963, Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Wallach, Wendell, and Colin Allen, 2009, Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Weckert, John, 2007, Computer Ethics, Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate. (Scholar)
• Wiggins, David, 1980, Sameness and Substance, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Winner, Langdon, 1977, Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus, 109(1): 121–136. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983, “Techné and Politeia: The Technical Constitution of Society”, in Philosophy and Technology, edited by Paul T. Durbin and Friedrich Rapp, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: D. Reidel, pp. 97–111. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-7124-0_7 (Scholar)
• Zandvoort, H., 2000, “Codes of Conduct, the Law, and Technological Design and Development”, in The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology, edited by Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers, Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier, pp. 193–205. (Scholar)
• Zuboff, Shoshana, 2017, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, New York: Public Affairs. (Scholar)
• Zwart, Sjoerd, Maarten Franssen and Peter Kroes, 2018, “Practical Inference—A Formal Approach”, in The Future of Engineering: Philosophical Foundations, Ethical Problems and Application Cases, edited by Albrecht Fritzsche and Sascha Julian Oks, Cham: Springer, pp. 33–52. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91029-1_3 (Scholar)
• Zwart, Sjoerd, Ibo van de Poel, Harald van Mil and Michiel Brumsen, 2006, “A Network Approach for Distinguishing Ethical Issues in Research and Development”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(4): 663–684. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0063-2 (Scholar)

Journals

• Philosophy & Technology
• Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology
• Science and Engineering Ethics
• Science, Technology & Human Values
• Ethics and Information Technology
• NanoEthics
• Neuroethics

Encyclopedias

• Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, 4 volumes, Carl Mitcham (ed.), Macmillan, 2005.
• Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, second edition, 4 volumes, Ruth Chadwick (editor-in-chief), Elsevier, 2012.