Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Philosophy of Technology" by Maarten Franssen, Gert-Jan Lokhorst and Ibo van de Poel
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Adams, Rachel, 2021, “Can artificial intelligence be
decolonized?”, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews,
46(1–2): 176–197. doi: 10.1080/03080188.2020.1840225. (Scholar)
- Agricola, Georgius, 1556 [1912], De re metallica,
Translated and edited by Herbert Clark Hoover and Lou Henry Hoover,
London: The Mining Magazine, 1912.
[Agricola 1556 [1912] available online] (Scholar)
- Akrich, Madeleine, 1992, “The Description of Technical
Objects”, in Bijker and Law (eds) 1992: 205–224. (Scholar)
- Allhoff, Fritz, Patrick Lin, James H. Moor and John Weckert (eds),
2007, Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of
Nanotechnology, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience. (Scholar)
- Anders, Günther, 1956, Die Antiquiertheit des
Menschen (Volume I: Über die Seele im Zeitalter der
zweiten industriellen Revolution; Volume II: Über die
Zerstörung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten industriellen
Revolution), München: C.H. Beck. (Scholar)
- Arendt, Hannah, 1958, The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Ariew, Andrew, Robert Cummins and Mark Perlman (eds), 2002, Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Aristotle, Physics, Translated in The Complete Works
of Aristotle, Volume 1, The Revised Oxford Translation 2014,
edited by Jonathan Barnes. (Scholar)
- Bacon, Francis, 1627, New Atlantis: A Worke Vnfinished, in his Sylva Sylvarum: or a Naturall Historie, in Ten Centuries, London: William Lee. (Scholar)
- Baum, Robert J., 1980, Ethics and Engineering Curricula,
Hastings-on-Hudson: The Hastings Center. (Scholar)
- Beauchamp, Tom L., 2003, “The Nature of Applied Ethics”, in Frey and Wellman (eds) 2003: 1–16. doi:10.1002/9780470996621.ch1">10.1002/9780470996621.ch1 (Scholar)
- Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress, 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, fifth edition, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, William, 1985, “Attributing Responsibility to Computer Systems”, Metaphilosophy, 16(4): 296–306. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00176.x (Scholar)
- Bijker, Wiebe E., and John Law (eds), 1992, Shaping
Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Bimber, Bruce, 1990, “Karl Marx and the Three Faces of
Technological Determinism”, Social Studies of Science,
20(2): 333–351. doi:10.1177/030631290020002006 (Scholar)
- Borgmann, Albert, 1984, Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Bostrom, Nick, and Eliezer Yudkowsky, 2014, “The Ethics of
Artificial Intelligence”, in The Cambridge Handbook of
Artificial Intelligence, edited by Keith Frankish and William M
Ramsey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 316–334.
doi:10.1017/cbo9781139046855.020 (Scholar)
- Brey, Philip A.E., 2012, “Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies”, NanoEthics, 6(1): 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11569-012-0141-7 (Scholar)
- Briffault, R., 1930, Rational Evolution (The Making of Humanity), New York: The Macmillan Company. (Scholar)
- Bucciarelli, Louis L., 1994, Designing Engineers,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Bunge, Mario, 1966, “Technology as Applied Science”,
Technology and Culture, 7(3): 329–347.
doi:10.2307/3101932 (Scholar)
- Butler, Samuel, 1872, Erewhon, London: Trubner and Co.
[Butler 1872 available online] (Scholar)
- Callon, Michel, 1986, “The Sociology of an Actor-Network:
the Case of the Electric Vehicle”, in Mapping the Dynamics
of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real
World, Michel Callon, John Law and Arie Rip (eds.), London:
Macmillan, pp. 19–34. (Scholar)
- Caney, Simon, 2014, “Two Kinds of Climate Justice: Avoiding Harm and Sharing Burdens”, Journal of Political Philosophy 22(2): 125–149. doi:10.1111/jopp.12030 (Scholar)
- Coeckelbergh, Mark, 2014, “The Moral Standing of Machines:
Towards a Relational and Non-Cartesian Moral Hermeneutics”,
Philosophy & Technology 27(1): 61–77. doi:
10.1007/s13347-013-0133-8. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020a, Introduction to Philosophy of Technology, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020b, AI Ethics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2022, The Political Philosophy of AI:
An Introduction, Cambridge: Polity. (Scholar)
- Cranor, Carl F., 1990, “Some Moral Issues in Risk Assessment”, Ethics, 101(1): 123–143. doi:10.1086/293263 (Scholar)
- Danaher, John, 2016, “Robots, Law and the Retribution
Gap”, Ethics and Information Technology 18(4):
299–309. doi: 10.1007/s10676-016-9403-3. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, “Welcoming Robots into the
Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism”, Science
and Engineering Ethics 26(4): 2023–2049. doi:
10.1007/s11948-019-00119-x. (Scholar)
- Darwin, Charles R., 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, London: John Murray. (Scholar)
- Davis, Michael, 1998, Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, Engineering Ethics, Aldershot/Burlington, VT: Ashgate. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “‘Ain’t No One Here But Us Social Forces’: Constructing the Professional Responsibility of Engineers”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1): 13–34. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9225-3 (Scholar)
- Dennett, Daniel C., 1997, “When HAL kills, who’s to
blame? Computer ethics”, in HAL’s Legacy: 2001’s
Computer as Dream and Reality, edited by David G. Stork.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 351–365. (Scholar)
- Di Nucci, Ezio, and Filippo Santoni de Sio, 2016, Drones and Responsibility: Legal, Philosophical and Socio-Technical Perspectives on Remotely Controlled Weapons, Milton Park: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Diels, Hermann, 1903, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Berlin: Weidmann. (Scholar)
- Dipert, Randall R., 1993, Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
- Doorn, Neelke, 2010, “A Rawlsian Approach to Distribute Responsibilities in Networks”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(2): 221–249. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9155-0 (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1): 69–90. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9189-3 (Scholar)
- Ellul, Jacques, 1954 [1964], La technique ou L’enjeu du siècle, Paris: Armand Colin. Translated as The Technological Society, by John Wilkinson, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964. (Scholar)
- Erlandson, Robert F., 2008, Universal and Accessible Design
for Products, Services, and Processes, Boca Raton, LA: CRC
Press. (Scholar)
- Feenberg, Andrew, 1999, Questioning Technology, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Finnis, John, Joseph Boyle and Germain Grisez, 1988, Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Floridi, Luciano, 2010, The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511845239 (Scholar)
- Floridi, Luciano, and J.W. Sanders, 2004, “On the Morality of Artificial Agents”, Minds and Machines, 14(3): 349–379. doi:10.1023/b:mind.0000035461.63578.9d (Scholar)
- Fox, Warwick, 2000, Ethics and the Built Environment, (Professional Ethics), London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Franssen, Maarten, 2005, “Arrow’s Theorem,
Multi-Criteria Decision Problems and Multi-Attribute Preferences in
Engineering Design”, Research in Engineering Design,
16(1–2): 42–56. doi:10.1007/s00163-004-0057-5 (Scholar)
- Franssen, Maarten, and Louis L. Bucciarelli, 2004, “On
Rationality in Engineering Design”, Journal of Mechanical
Design, 126(6): 945–949. doi:10.1115/1.1803850 (Scholar)
- Franssen, Maarten, and Stefan Koller, 2016, “Philosophy of Technology as a Serious Branch of Philosophy: The Empirical Turn as a Starting Point”, in Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn, edited by Maarten Franssen, Pieter E. Vermaas, Peter Kroes, and Anthonie W.M. Meijers, Cham: Springer, 31–61. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33717-3_3 (Scholar)
- Franssen, Maarten, Peter Kroes, Thomas A.C. Reydon and Pieter E.
Vermaas (eds), 2014, Artefact Kinds: Ontology and the Human-Made
World, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00801-1 (Scholar)
- Fraser, Nancy, and Axel Honneth, 2003, Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London and New York: Verso. (Scholar)
- Freeman, K., 1948, Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers (A complete translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Frey, R. G., and Christopher Heath Wellman (eds), 2003, A Companion to Applied Ethics, Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470996621 (Scholar)
- Friedman, Batya, and David Hendry, 2019, Value Sensitive
Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination, Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Garson, Justin, 2016, A Critical Overview of Biological
Functions, (SpringerBriefs in Philosophy), Cham: Springer
International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32020-5. (Scholar)
- Gehlen, Arnold, 1957, Die Seele im technischen Zeitalter,
Hamburg: Rowohlt. Translated as Man in the Age of Technology,
by Patricia Lipscomb, New York: Columbia University Press, 1980. (Scholar)
- Gunkel, David J., 2018, Robot Rights, Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press. (Scholar)
- Habermas, Jürgen, 1968 [1970], “Technik und
Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’” in an an anthology of
the same name, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag. Translated as
“Technology and Science as ‘Ideology’”, in
Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and
Politics, by Jeremy J. Shapiro, Boston, MA: Beacon Press, pp.
81–122. (Scholar)
- Hansson, Sven Ove, 2003, “Ethical Criteria of Risk Acceptance”, Erkenntnis, 59(3): 291–309. doi:10.1023/a:1026005915919 (Scholar)
- –––, 2004a, “Fallacies of Risk”, Journal of Risk Research, 7(3): 353–360. doi:10.1080/1366987042000176262 (Scholar)
- –––, 2004b, “Philosophical Perspectives on Risk”, Techné, 8(1): 10–35. doi:10.5840/techne2004818 (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Philosophical Problems in Cost-Benefit Analysis”, Economics and Philosophy, 23(2): 163–183. doi:10.1017/s0266267107001356 (Scholar)
- Harris, Charles E., Michael S. Pritchard and Michael J. Rabins,
2014, Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, fifth edition,
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (Scholar)
- Heidegger, Martin, 1954 [1977], “Die Frage nach der Technik”, in Vorträge und Aufsätze, Pfullingen: Günther Neske. Translated as “The Question concerning Technology”, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, by William Lovitt, New York: Harper and Row, 1977, pp. 3–35. (Scholar)
- Herkert, Joseph R., 2001, “Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3): 403–414. doi:10.1007/s11948-001-0062-2 (Scholar)
- Hilpinen, Risto, 1992, “Artifacts and Works of Art”, Theoria, 58(1): 58–82. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1992.tb01155.x (Scholar)
- Holt, Raymond, and Catherine Barnes, 2010, “Towards an
Integrated Approach to ‘Design for X’: An Agenda for
Decision-Based DFX Research”, Research in Engineering
Design, 21(2): 123–136. doi:10.1007/s00163-009-0081-6 (Scholar)
- Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno, 1947 [2002], Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente, Amsterdam: Querido Verlag. Translated as Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, by Edmund Jephcott, and edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002. (Scholar)
- Houkes, Wybo, 2009, “The Nature of Technological
Knowledge”, in Meijers 2009: 309–350.
doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50016-1 (Scholar)
- Houkes, Wybo, and Pieter E. Vermaas, 2010, Technical
Functions: On the Use and Design of Artefacts,
Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London /New York: Springer.
doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3900-2 (Scholar)
- Hughes, Jesse, Peter Kroes, and Sjoerd Zwart, 2007, “A Semantics for Means-End Relations”, Synthese, 158(2): 207–231. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9036-x (Scholar)
- Ihde, Don, 1979, Technics and Praxis, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, Technology and the Lifeworld: from Garden to Earth, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction, New York: Paragon. (Scholar)
- Ihde, Don, and Evan Selinger, 2003, Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- Illies, Christian, and Anthonie Meijers, 2009, “Artefacts Without Agency”, The Monist, 92(3): 420–440. doi:10.5840/monist200992324 (Scholar)
- Jarvie, Ian C., 1966, “The Social Character of Technological
Problems: Comments on Skolimowski’s Paper”, Technology
and Culture, 7(3): 384–390. doi:10.2307/3101936 (Scholar)
- Jenkins, Kirsten, Darren McCauley, Raphael Heffron, Hannes Stephan
and Robert Rehner, 2016, “Energy Justice: A Conceptual
Review”, Energy Research & Social Science 11:
174–182. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 (Scholar)
- Johnson, Deborah G., 2003, “Computer Ethics”, in Frey and Wellman 2003: 608–619. doi:10.1002/9780470996621.ch45 (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “Computer Systems: Moral Entities But Not Moral Agents”, Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4): 195–205. doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9111-5 (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, Computer Ethics, fourth edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Scholar)
- Johnson, Deborah G., and Thomas M. Powers, 2005, “Computer Systems and Responsibility: A Normative Look at Technological Complexity”, Ethics and Information Technology, 7(2): 99–107. doi:10.1007/s10676-005-4585-0 (Scholar)
- Jonas, Hans, 1979 [1984], Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch
einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation,
Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp; extended English edition The Imperative
of Responsibility: in Search of An Ethics for the Technological
Age, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1984. (Scholar)
- Kaplan, David M. (ed.), 2004 [2009], Readings in the Philosophy of Technology, Lanham, MD and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, first edition 2004, second revised edition 2009. (Scholar)
- Kapp, Ernst, 1877 [2018], Grundlinien Einer Philosophie Der Technik: Zur Entstehungsgeschichte Der Cultur Aus Neuen Gesichtspunkten, Braunschweig: Westermann [Kapp 1877 available online]. Translated as Elements of a Philosophy of Technology: On the Evolutionary History of Culture, by Lauren K. Wolfe, and edited by Jeffrey West Kirkwood and Leif Weatherby, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2018. (Scholar)
- Kitcher, Philip, 2001, Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011. The Ethical Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Klenk, Michael, 2021, “How Do Technological Artefacts Embody
Moral Values?”, Philosophy & Technology 34(3):
525–544. doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y. (Scholar)
- Kneese, Allen V., Shaul Ben-David and William D. Schulze, 1983,
“The Ethical Foundations of Benefit-Cost Analysis”, in
Energy and the Future, edited by Douglas E. MacLean and Peter
G. Brown, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littefield, pp. 59–74. (Scholar)
- Kotarbinski, Tadeusz, 1965, Praxiology: An Introduction to the Sciences of Efficient Action, Oxford: Pergamon Press. (Scholar)
- Kroes, Peter, 2012, Technical Artefacts: Creations of Mind and
Matter, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.
doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3940-6 (Scholar)
- Kroes, Peter, and Anthonie Meijers (eds), 2006, “The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts”, Special issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37(1): 1–158. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.12.001 (Scholar)
- Kroes, Peter, Maarten Franssen and Louis Bucciarelli, 2009,
“Rationality in Design”, in Meijers (ed.) 2009:
565–600. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50025-2 (Scholar)
- Kroes, Peter, and Peter-Paul Verbeek (eds), 2014, The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts, Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3 (Scholar)
- Kuhn, Thomas S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Ladd, John, 1991, “Bhopal: An Essay on Moral Responsibility and Civic Virtue”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 22(1): 73–91. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1991.tb00022.x (Scholar)
- Latour, Bruno, 1992, “Where Are the Missing Masses?”,
in Bijker and Law (eds) 1992: 225–258. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, We Have Never Been Modern, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Lawson, Clive, 2008, “An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions”, Technè, 12(1): 48–64. doi:10.5840/techne200812114 (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, Technology and Isolation, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316848319 (Scholar)
- Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney and Ryan Jenkins (eds), 2017, Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Lloyd, G.E.R., 1973, “Analogy in Early Greek Thought”,
in The Dictionary of the History of Ideas, edited by Philip
P. Wiener, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, vol. 1 pp.
60–64.
[Lloyd 1973 available online] (Scholar)
- Lloyd, Peter A., and Jerry A. Busby, 2003, “‘Things that Went Well—No Serious Injuries or Deaths’: Ethical Reasoning in a Normal Engineering Design Process”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4): 503–516. doi:10.1007/s11948-003-0047-4 (Scholar)
- Longino, Helen, 1990, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Maheshwari, Kritika, and Sven Nyholm, 2022, “Dominating Risk
Impositions”, The Journal of Ethics. doi:
10.1007/s10892-022-09407-4. (Scholar)
- Mahner, Martin, and Mario Bunge, 2001, “Function and Functionalism: A Synthetic Perspective”, Philosophy of Science, 68(1): 73–94. doi:10.1086/392867 (Scholar)
- Marcuse, Herbert, 1964, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, New York: Beacon Press, and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Martin, Miles W., and Roland Schinzinger, 2022, Ethics in
Engineering, fifth edition, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. (Scholar)
- Matthias, Andreas, 2004, “The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing
Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata”, Ethics
and Information Technology 6(3): 175–183. doi:
10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1. (Scholar)
- McGinn, Robert E., 2010, “What’s Different, Ethically, About Nanotechnology? Foundational Questions and Answers”, NanoEthics, 4(2): 115–128. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0089-4 (Scholar)
- Meijers, Anthonie (ed.), 2009, Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, volume 9), Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Scholar)
- Michelfelder, Diane P., and Neelke Doorn (eds), 2021, The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering, New York and Milton Park, UK: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Miller, Boaz, 2020, “Is Technology Value-Neutral?”,
Science, Technology & Human Values 46(1): 53–80.
doi: 10.1177/0162243919900965. (Scholar)
- Millikan, Ruth Garrett, 1999, “Wings, Spoons, Pills, and Quills: A Pluralist Theory of Function”, The Journal of Philosophy, 96(4): 191–206. doi:10.5840/jphil199996428 (Scholar)
- Mitcham, Carl, 1994, Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo,
Sandra Wachter and Luciano Floridi, 2016, “The Ethics of
Algorithms: Mapping the Debate”, Big Data &
Society, 3(2): 1–21. doi:10.1177/2053951716679679 (Scholar)
- Moor, James H., 1985, “What is Computer Ethics?” Metaphilosophy, 16(4): 266–275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4): 18–21. doi:10.1109/mis.2006.80 (Scholar)
- Mosakas, Kestutis, 2021, “On the Moral Status of Social
Robots: Considering the Consciousness Criterion”, AI &
Society 36(2): 429–443. doi:
10.1007/s00146-020-01002-1. (Scholar)
- Mumford, Lewis, 1934, Technics and Civilization, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Newman, William R., 2004, Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and
the Quest to Perfect Nature, Chicago: University of Chicago
Press. (Scholar)
- Niiniluoto, Ilkka, 1993, “The Aim and Structure of Applied Research”, Erkenntnis, 38(1): 1–21. doi:10.1007/bf01129020 (Scholar)
- Nissenbaum, Helen, 1996, “Accountability in a Computerized Society”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 2(1): 25–42. doi:10.1007/bf02639315 (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, Privacy in Context: Technology,
Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life, Stanford, CA: Stanford
Law Books. (Scholar)
- Nyholm, Sven, 2018, “Attributing Agency to Automated
Systems: Reflections on Human-Robot Collaborations and
Responsibility-Loci”, Science and Engineering Ethics
24(4): 1201–1219. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9943-x. (Scholar)
- Olsen, Jan Kyrre Berg, Evan Selinger and Søren Riis (eds), 2009, New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230227279 (Scholar)
- Owen, Richard, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 2013, Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, Chichester: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118551424 (Scholar)
- Peterson, Martin, 2020, Ethics for Engineers, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Peterson, Martin, and Andreas Spahn, 2011, “Can Technological Artefacts be Moral Agents?” Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3): 411–424. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9241-3 (Scholar)
- Pettit, Philip, 2012, On the People’s Terms: A
Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, The Seeley lectures,
Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Pitt, Joseph C., 1999, Thinking About Technology: Foundations
of the Philosophy of Technology, New York: Seven Bridges
Press. (Scholar)
- Plato, Laws, 2016, M. Schofield (ed.), T. Griffith (tr.),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- –––, Timaeus and Critias, 2008, R.
Waterfield (tr.), with introduction and notes by A. Gregory, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
- Polanyi, Michael, 1958, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Preston, Beth, 1998, “Why is a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function”, The Journal of Philosophy, 95(5): 215–254. doi:10.2307/2564689 (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Of Marigold Beer: A Reply to Vermaas and Houkes”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54(4): 601–612. doi:10.1093/bjps/54.4.601 (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, A Philosophy of Material Culture: Action, Function, and Mind, New York and Milton Park, UK: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Preston, Christopher J. (ed.), 2016, Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Atmospheric Anthropocene, London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. (Scholar)
- Radder, Hans, 2009, “Why Technologies Are Inherently
Normative”, in Meijers (ed.) 2009: 887–921.
doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50037-9 (Scholar)
- Rawls, John, 1999, A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Roeser, Sabine, 2012, “Moral Emotions as Guide to Acceptable
Risk”, in Roeser et al. 2012: 819–832.
doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_32">10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_32 (Scholar)
- Roeser, Sabine, Rafaela Hillerbrand, Per Sandin and Martin Peterson (eds), 2012, Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5 (Scholar)
- Ryle, Gilbert, 1949, The Concept of Mind, London: Hutchinson. (Scholar)
- Santoni de Sio, Filippo, and Giulio Mecacci, 2021, “Four
Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and
How to Address them”, Philosophy & Technology
34(4): 1057–1084. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00450-x. (Scholar)
- Santoni de Sio, Filippo, and Jeroen van den Hoven, 2018.
“Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A
Philosophical Account”, Frontiers in Robotics and AI.
doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00015. (Scholar)
- Scharff, Robert C., and Val Dusek (eds), 2003 [2014],
Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition,
Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell, first edition 2003, second [revised]
edition 2014. (Scholar)
- Schummer, Joachim, 2001, “Aristotle on Technology and Nature”, Philosophia Naturalis, 38: 105–120. (Scholar)
- Sclove, Richard E., 1995, Democracy and Technology, New
York: The Guilford Press. (Scholar)
- Sellars, Wilfrid, 1962, “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man”, in Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, edited by R. Colodny, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 35–78. (Scholar)
- Sharkey, Amanda, and Noel Sharkey, 2021, “We Need to Talk
about Deception in Social Robotics!”, Ethics and Information
Technology 23(3): 309–316. doi:
10.1007/s10676-020-09573-9. (Scholar)
- Sherlock, Richard, and John D. Morrey (eds), 2002, Ethical
Issues in Biotechnology, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- Shrader-Frechette, Kristen S., 1985, Risk Analysis and
Scientific Method: Methodological and Ethical Problems with Evaluating
Societal Hazards, Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reform, Berkeley etc.: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Simon, Herbert A., 1957, Models of Man, Social and Rational:
Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social
Setting, New York: John Wiley. (Scholar)
- –––, 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, Models of Bounded
Rationality, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Skolimowski, Henryk, 1966, “The Structure of Thinking in
Technology”, Technology and Culture, 7(3):
371–383. doi:10.2307/3101935 (Scholar)
- Snapper, John W., 1985, “Responsibility for Computer-Based Errors”, Metaphilosophy, 16(4): 289–295. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00175.x (Scholar)
- Soavi, Marzia, 2009, “Realism and Artifact Kinds”, in Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Ulrich Krohs and Peter Kroes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 185–202. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262113212.003.0011 (Scholar)
- Sparrow, Robert, 2007, “Killer Robots”, Journal of Applied Philosophy 24(1): 62–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x (Scholar)
- Suh, Nam Pyo, 2001, Axiomatic Design: Advances and
Applications, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Susskind, Jamie, 2022, The Digital Republic: On Freedom and
Democracy in the 21st Century, London: Bloomsbury. (Scholar)
- Swierstra, Tsjalling, and Jaap Jelsma, 2006, “Responsibility Without Moralism in Technoscientific Design Practice”, Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(1): 309–332. doi:10.1177/0162243905285844 (Scholar)
- Swierstra, Tsjalling, and Hedwig te Molder, 2012, “Risk and
Soft Impacts”, in Roeser et al. (eds) 2012: 1049–1066.
doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_42 (Scholar)
- Taebi, Behnam, 2021, Ethics and Engineering: An Introduction, Cambridge Applied Ethics series, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Taebi, Behnam, and Sabine Roeser (eds), 2015, The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice, and Democracy in the Post-Fukushima Era, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781107294905 (Scholar)
- Tavani, Herman T., 2002, “The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly is at Issue, and Why Does it Matter?” Ethics and Information Technology, 4(1): 37–54. doi:10.1023/a:1015283808882 (Scholar)
- Thomasson, Amie L., 2003, “Realism and Human Kinds”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(3): 580–609. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00309.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Artifacts and Human Concepts”, in Creations of the Mind: Essays on Artifacts and Their Representation, edited by Eric Margolis and Stephen Laurence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–73. (Scholar)
- Thompson, Dennis F., 1980, “Moral Responsibility and Public
Officials: The Problem of Many Hands”, American Political
Science Review, 74(4): 905–916. doi:10.2307/1954312 (Scholar)
- Thompson, Paul B., 2007, Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective, second edition, Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-5791-1 (Scholar)
- Vallor, Shannon (ed.), 2022, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- van den Hoven, Jeroen, and John Weckert (eds), 2008, Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- van den Hoven, Jeroen, Pieter E. Vermaas and Ibo van de Poel
(eds), 2015, Handbook of Ethics and Values in Technological
Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains,
Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6 (Scholar)
- van de Poel, Ibo, 2009, “Values in Engineering Design”, in Meijers (ed.) 2009: 973–1006. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50040-9 (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(3): 667–686. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9724-3 (Scholar)
- van de Poel, Ibo, and Lambèr Royakkers, 2011, Ethics, Technology and Engineering, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
- van de Poel, Ibo, Lambèr Royakkers and Sjoerd D. Zwart, 2015, Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- van der Pot, Johan Hendrik Jacob, 1985 [1994/2004], Die Bewertung des technischen Fortschritts: eine systematische Übersicht der Theorien, 2 volumes, Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum. Translated as Steward or Sorcerer’s Apprentice? the Evaluation of Technical Progress: A Systematic Overview of Theories and Opinions, by Chris Turner, 2 volumes., Delft: Eburon, 1994, second edition, 2004, under the title Encyclopedia of Technological Progress: A Systematic Overview of Theories and Opinions. (Scholar)
- van Wynsberghe, Aimee, and Scott Robbins, 2019, “Critiquing
the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents”, Science and
Engineering Ethics 25(3): 719–735. doi:
10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8. (Scholar)
- Verbeek, Peter-Paul, 2000 [2005], De daadkracht der Dingen: Over Techniek, Filosofie En Vormgeving, Amsterdam: Boom. Translated as What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design, by Robert P. Crease, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2005. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Vermaas, Pieter E., and Wybo Houkes, 2003, “Ascribing Functions to Technical Artefacts: A Challenge to Etiological Accounts of Functions”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54(2): 261–289. doi:10.1093/bjps/54.2.261 (Scholar)
- Vincenti, Walter A., 1990, What Engineers Know and How They
Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, Baltimore,
MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- Vitruvius, De architecture, translated as The Ten
Books on Architecture, by Morris H. Morgan. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, 1914.
[Vitruvius Morgan’s translation 1914 available online]
- Volti, Rudi, 2009, Society and Technological Change,
sixth edition, New York: Worth Publications. (Scholar)
- Von Wright, Georg Henrik, 1963, Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Wallach, Wendell, and Colin Allen, 2009, Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Weckert, John, 2007, Computer Ethics, Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate. (Scholar)
- Wiggins, David, 1980, Sameness and Substance, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Winner, Langdon, 1977, Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus, 109(1): 121–136. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983, “Techné and Politeia: The Technical Constitution of Society”, in Philosophy and Technology, edited by Paul T. Durbin and Friedrich Rapp, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: D. Reidel, pp. 97–111. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-7124-0_7 (Scholar)
- Zandvoort, H., 2000, “Codes of Conduct, the Law, and
Technological Design and Development”, in The Empirical Turn
in the Philosophy of Technology, edited by Peter Kroes and
Anthonie Meijers, Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier, pp. 193–205. (Scholar)
- Zuboff, Shoshana, 2017, The Age of Surveillance
Capitalism, New York: Public Affairs. (Scholar)
- Zwart, Sjoerd, Maarten Franssen and Peter Kroes, 2018,
“Practical Inference—A Formal Approach”, in The
Future of Engineering: Philosophical Foundations, Ethical Problems and
Application Cases, edited by Albrecht Fritzsche and Sascha Julian
Oks, Cham: Springer, pp. 33–52.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91029-1_3 (Scholar)
- Zwart, Sjoerd, Ibo van de Poel, Harald van Mil and Michiel Brumsen, 2006, “A Network Approach for Distinguishing Ethical Issues in Research and Development”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(4): 663–684. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0063-2 (Scholar)
Journals
Encyclopedias
- Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, 4
volumes, Carl Mitcham (ed.), Macmillan, 2005.
- Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, second edition, 4
volumes, Ruth Chadwick (editor-in-chief), Elsevier, 2012.