Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Teleological Arguments for God’s Existence" by Del Ratzsch and Jeffrey Koperski

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Babbage, Charles, 1838. Ninth Bridgewater Treatise: A Fragment, London: J. Murray. (Scholar)
Barrow, John D. 2002. The Constants of Nature, New York: Pantheon Books. (Scholar)
Behe, Michael, 1996. Darwin’s Black Box, New York: Free Press. (Scholar)
Boyle, Robert, 1685–6. Free Inquiry into the Vulgarly Receiv’d Notions of Nature, in Hall 1965, pp. 150–153. (Scholar)
–––, 1688. A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things, London: John Taylor. (Scholar)
Broad, C.D., 1925. The Mind and its Place in Nature, London: Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
Callender, Craig, 2004. “Measures, Explanations and the Past: Should ‘Special’ Initial Conditions Be Explained,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(2): 195–217. (Scholar)
Carroll, Sean M., 2020. “Why Boltzmann Brains Are Bad,” in Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science, edited by Shamik Dasgupta, Brad Weslake, and Ravit Dotan, 7–20. New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
Chesterton, G.K., 1908. “Ethics of Elfland,” in Orthodoxy, New York: John Lane, pp. 106–7. (Scholar)
Collins, Robin, 2003. “Evidence for Fine-Tuning,” in God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, edited by Neil A. Manson, 178–99. New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 2009. “The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-Tuning of the Universe,” in The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, edited by William Lane Craig and J.P. Moreland, 202–81. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
–––, 2012. “Modern Cosmology and Anthropic Fine-Tuning: Three Approaches,” in Georges Lemaître: Life, Science and Legacy, edited by Rodney D. Holder and Simon Mitton. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. (Scholar)
Crick, Francis, 1988. What Mad Pursuit, New York: Basic. (Scholar)
Darwin, Charles, 1859 [1966]. On the Origin of Species, Facsimile first edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Darwin, Charles, 1887. Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Vol. 1, Francis Darwin (ed.), New York: D. Appleton. (Scholar)
–––, 1902 [1995]. The Life of Charles Darwin, Francis Darwin (ed.), London: Senate.
–––, 1987. Charles Darwin’s Notebooks, 1836–1844. Transcribed and edited by Paul Barrett, Peter Gautrey, Sandra Herbert, Dave Kohn and Sydney Smith, Ithaca: Cornell. (Scholar)
Davies, Paul, 1992. The Mind of God, New York: Simon & Schuster. (Scholar)
–––, 1995. Are We Alone?, New York: Basic. (Scholar)
Dawkins, Richard, 1987. Blind Watchmaker, New York: Norton. (Scholar)
Dembski, William, 1998. The Design Inference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Earman, John. 1987. “The SAP Also Rises: A Critical Examination of the Anthropic Principle,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 24(4): 307–17. (Scholar)
Edwards, Jonathan, 1980. The Works of Jonathan Edwards Wallace Anderson (ed.), Volume 6: Scientific and Philosophical Writings, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
Fitelson, Brandon, 2007. “Likelihood, Bayesianism, and Relational Confirmation,” Synthese, 156: 473–489. (Scholar)
Foster, John, 1982–3. “Induction, Explanation and Natural Necessity,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 83: 87–101. (Scholar)
Foster, John, 1985. A. J. Ayer, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
Gillispie, Neal C., 1990. “Divine Design and the Industrial Revolution: William Paley’s Abortive Reform of Natural Theology,” Isis, 81: 213–229. (Scholar)
Glass, Marvin and Julian Wolfe, 1986. “Paley’s Design Argument for God,” Sophia, 25(2): 17–19. (Scholar)
Gibbons, G. W., S. W. Hawking, and J. M. Stewart, 1987. “A Natural Measure on the Set of All Universes,” Nuclear Physics B, 281(3–4): 736–51. (Scholar)
Hall, Marie Boas, 1965. Robert Boyle on Natural Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University. (Scholar)
Harnik, Roni, Graham Kribs, and Gilad Perez, 2006. “A Universe without Weak Interactions,” Physical Review D, 74(3), doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.035006 (Scholar)
Harrison, Edward, 1985. Masks of the Universe, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
Holder, Rodney D., 2004. God, the Multiverse, and Everything: Modern Cosmology and the Argument from Design, Aldershot: Ashgate. (Scholar)
Hoyle, Frederick, 1982. “The Universe: Past and Present Reflections,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20: 1–35. (Scholar)
Hume, David, 1779 [1998]. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Richard Popkin (ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett.
Janet, Paul, 1884. Final Causes, 2nd edition, Robert Flint (trans.), New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. (Scholar)
Jantzen, Benjamin C., 2014a. An Introduction to Design Arguments, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2014b. “Piecewise versus Total Support: How to Deal with Background Information in Likelihood Arguments,” Philosophy of Science, 81(3): 313–31. (Scholar)
Kingsley, Charles, 1890. Water Babies, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
Koperski, Jeffrey. 2005. “Should We Care about Fine-Tuning?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(2): 303–19. (Scholar)
–––, 2015. The Physics of Theism: God, Physics, and the Philosophy of Science. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
Kotzen, Matthew, 2012. “Selection Biases in Likelihood Arguments,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(4): 825–39. (Scholar)
Kraay, Klaas. 2014. God and the Multiverse: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Perspectives. Routledge. (Scholar)
Lenoir, Timothy, 1982. Strategy of Life, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Lipton, Peter, 1991. Inference to the Best Explanation. 1st Edition. London: Routledge. (Scholar)
Loeb, Abraham, 2014. “The Habitable Epoch of the Early Universe,” International Journal of Astrobiology, 13(4): 337–339. (Scholar)
Manson, Neil (ed.), 2003. God and Design: The teleological argument and modern science, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 2009. “The Fine-Tuning Argument,” Philosophy Compass, 4(1): 271–86. (Scholar)
–––, 2018. “How Not to Be Generous to Fine-Tuning Sceptics,” Religious Studies, first online 21 September 2018, doi:10.1017/s0034412518000586 (Scholar)
McGrew, Timothy, Lydia McGrew, and Eric Vestrup, 2001. “Probabilities and the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Sceptical View,” Mind, 110(440): 1027–38. (Scholar)
McPherson, Thomas, 1965. The Philosophy of Religion, London: Van Nostrand. (Scholar)
Meyer, Stephen, 1998. “DNA by Design: An inference to the best explanation for the origin of biological information,” Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 1: 519–555. (Scholar)
–––, 2009. Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design, New York: HarperOne. (Scholar)
Monton, Bradley. 2006. “God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57: 405–24. (Scholar)
Murray, Michael (ed.), 1999. Reason for the Hope Within, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. (Scholar)
Oberhummer, H.H., A. Csótó, and H. Schlattl. 2000. “Fine-Tuning of Carbon Based Life in the Universe by Triple-Alpha Process in Red Giants,” Science, 289: 88–90. (Scholar)
Paley, William, 1802. Natural Theology, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963. (Scholar)
Peirce, Charles S., 1955. Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Justus Buchler (ed.), New York: Dover. (Scholar)
Pennock, Robert T., 2000. Tower of Babel: The Evidence against the New Creationism, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Penrose, Roger, 1990. The Emperor’s New Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Plantinga, Alvin, 2011. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Ratzsch, Del, 2001. Nature, Design and Science, Albany: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
Rott, Hans, 2010. “Idealizations, Intertheory Explanations and Conditionals,” in Belief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, Volume 21), edited by E. J. Olsson and S. Enqvist, 59–76, New York: Springer. (Scholar)
–––, 2003. “Perceiving Design,” in Manson 2003, pp. 124–144. (Scholar)
Smolin, Lee. 1999. The Life of the Cosmos, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Sober, Elliott, 1993. Philosophy of Biology, Boulder: Westview. (Scholar)
–––, 2003. “The Design Argument” in Manson 2003, pp. 27–54. (Scholar)
–––, 2009. “Absence of Evidence and Evidence of Absence: Evidential Transitivity in Connection with Fossils, Fishing, Fine-Tuning, and Firing Squads,” Philosophical Studies, 143(1): 63–90. (Scholar)
–––, 2019. The Design Argument. Elements in the Philosophy of Religion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108558068 (Scholar)
Whewell, William, 1834. Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, London: William Pickering. (Scholar)

Generated Tue May 30 07:42:27 2023

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...