Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Tense and Aspect" by Friedrich Hamm and Oliver Bott

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Anderson, S., T. Matlock, C. Fausey, and M. Spivey, 2008, “On the path to understanding the on-line processing of grammatical aspect”, in Proceedings of the 30th CogSci conference, 2253–2258. (Scholar)
  • Asher, N. and A. Lascarides, 2003, Logics of Conversation. Studies in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bach, E., 1986, “The algebra of events”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1): 5–16. (Scholar)
  • Baggio, G., M. van Lambalgen, and P. Hagoort, 2008, “Computing and recomputing discourse models: an ERP study”, Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1): 36–53. (Scholar)
  • Baggio, G. and M. van Lambalgen, 2007, “The processing consequences of the imperfective paradox”, Journal of Semantics, 24(4): 307–330. (Scholar)
  • Bealer, G. and U. Mönnich, 1989, “Property theories”, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic (Volume IV), D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Blackburn, P. and K.F. Jørgensen, 2016, “Reichenbach, Prior and hybrid tense logic”, Synthese, 193(11): 3677–3689. (Scholar)
  • Bonomi, A., 1997, “The progressive and the structure of events”, Journal of Semantics, 14(2): 173–205. (Scholar)
  • Bott, O., 2008, “Doing it again and again may be difficult—but it depends on what you are doing”, in Proceedings of the 27th WCCFL conference, N. Abner and J. Bishop (eds.), Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 63–71. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, The processing of events, vol. 162 of Linguistics Today, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
  • Bott, O. and F. Hamm, 2014, “Crosslinguistic variation in the processing of aspect”, in Meaning and Understanding across Languages (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics), B. Hemforth, B. Mertins, and C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds.), Cham: Springer International Publishing. (Scholar)
  • Bott, O. and Gattnar, A., 2015, “The cross-linguistic processing of aspect: An  eyetracking study on the time course of aspectual interpretation in German and Russian”, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(7): 877–898. (Scholar)
  • Brennan, J. and L. Pylkkänen, 2008, “Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion”, Brain & Language, 106(2): 132–143. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “Processing psych verbs: Behavioural and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity”, Language and cognitive processes, 25(6): 777–807. (Scholar)
  • Coll-Florit, M. and S. P. Gennari, 2011, “Time in language: Event duration in language comprehension”, Cognitive Psychology, 62(1): 41–79. (Scholar)
  • Comrie, B., 1976, Aspect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985, Tense, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Copley, B., and Harley, H., 2015, “A force-theoretic framework for event structure”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 38(2): 103–158.
  • Davidson, D., 1967, “The logical form of action sentences”, in The Logic of Decision and Action, N. Rescher (ed.), Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
  • de Swart, H. and F. Corblin, (eds.), 2002, Handbook of French Semantics, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Dickey, M., 2001, The Processing of Tense: Psycholinguistic Studies on the Interpretation of Tense and Temporal Relations, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
  • Doets, K., 1994, From Logic to Logic Programming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Dowty, D., 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Egg, M., 2005, Flexible Semantics for Reinterpretation phenomena, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Ferretti, T., M. Kutas, and K. McRae, 2007, “Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1): 182–196. (Scholar)
  • Filip, H., 2008, “Events and Maximalization”, in Crosslinguistic Appraches to the Semantics of Aspect, S. Rothstein (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217–256. (Scholar)
  • Gamut, L.T.F., 1991, Logic, Language and Meaning: Volume II, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Gennari, S. and D. Poeppel, 2003, “Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity”, Cognition, 89(1): B27–B41. (Scholar)
  • Grätzer, G. (1978). General Lattice Theory, Basel/Boston/Berlin: Birkhäuser. (Scholar)
  • Grondin, S. (ed.), 2008, Psychology of Time, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. (Scholar)
  • Hanks, S. and D. McDermott, 1986, “Default reasoning, nonmonotonic logic, and the frame problem”, Proceedings AAAI, 86: 328–333. (Scholar)
  • Heim, I., 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Scholar)
  • Kamp, H., 1979, “Events, instants and temporal reference”, in Semantics from Different Points of View, R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991, “The perfect and other tenses in French and English”, in Tense and Aspect in English and French, Dyana Deliverable R2. 3B, 41–64. (Scholar)
  • Kamp, H. and U. Reyle, 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Kowalski, R., 1995, “How to reconcile reactive and rational agents”, in Meta-Logic and Logic Programming, Apt and Turini (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Kowalski, R. A. and M. Sergot, 1986, “A logic-based calculus of events”, New Generation Computing, 4(1): 67–95.
  • Krifka, M., 1989, Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution, Munich: Fink.  (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, “Thematic roles as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution”, in Lexical Matters, I. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 29–53. (Scholar)
  • Landman, F., 1992, “The progressive”, Natural Language Semantics, 1: 1–32. (Scholar)
  • Lecarme, J., 2008, “Tense and modality in nominals”, in Time and Modality, J. Guéron and J. Lecarme (eds.), Springer, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. (Scholar)
  • Madden, C. and T. Ferretti, 2009, “Verb aspect and the mental representation of situations”, in The expression of time, W. Klein and P. Li (eds.), Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 217–240. (Scholar)
  • Madden, C. and R. Zwaan, 2003, “How does verb aspect constrain event representations?”, Memory & Cognition, 31(5): 663–672. (Scholar)
  • McCarthy, J., 1977, “Epistemological problems of artificial intelligence”, in Proceedings of IJACAI-77. (Scholar)
  • McKoon, G. and T. Macfarland, 2002, “Event templates in the lexical representations of verbs”, Cognitive Psychology, 45(1): 1–44. (Scholar)
  • Moens, M. and M. Steedman, 1988, “Temporal ontology and temporal reference”, Computational Linguistics, 14: 15–28. (Scholar)
  • Naumann, R. and Ch. Piñón, 1997, “Decomposing the progressive”, in Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, P. Dekker, M. Stokhof, and Y. Venema (eds.), Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. (Scholar)
  • Nienhuys-Cheng, S-H. and R. de Wolf, 1997, Foundations of Inductive Logic Programming, New York, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Oettinger, A., 1966, “The Uses of Computers in Science”, Scientific American, 215: 166–169. (Scholar)
  • Ogihara, T., 1990, “Semantics of the progressive and the perfect in English”, in Dyana–Report R.2.5.A, H. Kamp (ed.), ESPRIT Basic Research Project 6852. (Scholar)
  • Parsons, T., 1989, “The progressive in English: Events, states and processes”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(2): 213–241. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Pickering, M.J., B. McElree, S. Frisson, L. Chen, and M.J. Traxler, 2006, “Underspecification and coercion”, Discourse Processes, 42(2): 131–155. (Scholar)
  • Piñango, M.M., E. Zurif, and R. Jackendoff, 1999, “Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax-semantics interface”, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(4): 395–414. (Scholar)
  • Prior, A., 1967, Past, Present, and Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Reichenbach, H., 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York: Dover Publications, Inc. (Scholar)
  • Russell, B., 1914, Our Knowledge of the External World, London: Allen and Unwin. (Scholar)
  • Shanahan, M., 1997, Solving the Frame Problem: A Mathematical Investigation of the Common Sense Law of Inertia, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Smith, C. S., 1991, The Parameter of Aspect, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
  • Spencer, A., 1991, Morphological Theory, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Steedman, M., 1997, “Temporality”, in Handbook of Logic and Language, J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier. (Scholar)
  • Stenning, K. and M. van Lambalgen, 2005, “Semantic interpretation as computation in nonmonotonic logic: The real meaning of the suppression task”, Cognitive Science, 29(6): 919–960. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Thomason, S., 1986, “On constructing instants from events”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 13(1): 85–96. (Scholar)
  • Todorova, M., K. Straub, W. Badecker, and R. Frank, 2000, “Aspectual coercion and the online computation of sentential aspect”, Proceedings of the CogSci 2000 Conference. (Scholar)
  • van Lambalgen, M. and F. Hamm, 2005, The Proper Treatment of Events, Malden: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Vendler, Z., 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
  • Verkuyl, H., 1993, A Theory of Aspectability. The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • von Stutterheim, C., M. Andermann, M. Carroll, M. Flecken, and B. Schmiedtová, 2012, “How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance”, Linguistics, 50(4): 833–867. (Scholar)
  • von Stutterheim, C., M. Carroll, and W. Klein, 2009, “New perspectives in analyzing aspectual distinctions across languages”, in The expression of time, W. Klein and P. Li (eds.), Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 195–216. (Scholar)
  • Walker, A. G., 1947, “Durées et instants”, Revue Scientifique, 85: 131–134. (Scholar)
  • Zacks, J., K.M. Swallow, J.M. Vettel, and M.P. McAvoy, 2006, “Visual motion and the neural correlates of event perception”, Brain Research, 1076: 150–162. (Scholar)
  • Zacks, J. and B. Tversky, 2001, “Event structure in perception and conception”, Psychological Bulletin, 127: 3–21. (Scholar)
  • Zacks, J., B. Tversky, and G. Iyer, 2001, “Perceiving, remembering and communicating structure in events”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130: 29–58. (Scholar)
  • Zucchi, S., 1999, “Incomplete events, intensionality and imperfective aspect”, Natural Language Semantics, 7(2): 179–215. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Jun 27 08:19:06 2022