Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Tense and Aspect" by Friedrich Hamm and Oliver Bott
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Altshuler, D., 2012, “Aspectual meaning meets discourse
coherence: A look at the Russian imperfective”, Journal
of Semantics, 29: 39–108. (Scholar)
- Anderson, S., T. Matlock, C. Fausey, and M. Spivey, 2008, “On the path to understanding the on-line processing of grammatical aspect”, in Proceedings of the 30th CogSci conference, 2253–2258. (Scholar)
- Asher, N. and A. Lascarides, 2003, Logics of Conversation. Studies in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Bach, E., 1986, “The algebra of events”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1): 5–16. (Scholar)
- Baggio, G., M. van Lambalgen, and P. Hagoort, 2008,
“Computing and recomputing discourse models: an ERP
study”, Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1):
36–53. (Scholar)
- Baggio, G. and M. van Lambalgen, 2007, “The processing consequences of the imperfective paradox”, Journal of Semantics, 24(4): 307–330. (Scholar)
- Bealer, G. and U. Mönnich, 1989, “Property theories”, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic (Volume IV), D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Blackburn, P. and K.F. Jørgensen, 2016, “Reichenbach, Prior and hybrid tense logic”, Synthese, 193(11): 3677–3689. (Scholar)
- Bonomi, A., 1997, “The progressive and the structure of
events”, Journal of Semantics, 14(2):
173–205. (Scholar)
- Bott, O., 2008, “Doing it again and again may be
difficult—but it depends on what you are doing”, in
Proceedings of the 27th WCCFL conference, N. Abner and J.
Bishop (eds.), Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 63–71. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, The processing of events,
vol. 162 of Linguistics Today, Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. (Scholar)
- Bott, O. and F. Hamm, 2014, “Crosslinguistic variation in
the processing of aspect”, in Meaning and Understanding
across Languages (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics), B.
Hemforth, B. Mertins, and C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds.), Cham: Springer
International Publishing. (Scholar)
- Bott, O. and Gattnar, A., 2015, “The cross-linguistic
processing of aspect: An eyetracking study on the time course of
aspectual interpretation in German and Russian”, Language,
Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(7): 877–898. (Scholar)
- Brennan, J. and L. Pylkkänen, 2008, “Processing events:
Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion”,
Brain & Language, 106(2): 132–143. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Processing psych verbs:
Behavioural and MEG measures of two different types of semantic
complexity”, Language and cognitive processes, 25(6):
777–807. (Scholar)
- Champollion, L., 2015, “The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 38(1): 31–66. (Scholar)
- Coll-Florit, M. and S. P. Gennari, 2011, “Time in language:
Event duration in language comprehension”, Cognitive
Psychology, 62(1): 41–79. (Scholar)
- Comrie, B., 1976, Aspect, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, Tense, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. (Scholar)
- Copley, B., and Harley, H., 2015, “A force-theoretic
framework for event structure”, Linguistics and
Philosophy, 38(2): 103–158.
- Coppock, E. and L. Champollion, under
revision, Invitation to Formal Semantics,
manuscript.
- Davidson, D., 1967, “The logical form of action sentences”, in The Logic of Decision and Action, N. Rescher (ed.), Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
- de Swart, H. and F. Corblin, (eds.), 2002, Handbook of French
Semantics, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
- Dickey, M., 2001, The Processing of Tense: Psycholinguistic
Studies on the Interpretation of Tense and Temporal Relations,
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
- Doets, K., 1994, From Logic to Logic Programming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Dowty, D., 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Egg, M., 2005, Flexible Semantics for Reinterpretation
phenomena, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
- Elman, J.L. and K. McRae, 2019, “A model of event
knowledge”, Psychological Review,
126: 252–291.
- Ferretti, T.R., M. Kutas, and K. McRae, 2007, “Verb aspect
and the activation of event knowledge”, Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1):
182–196. (Scholar)
- Ferretti, T.R., H. Rohde, A. Kehler and M. Crutchley, 2009,
“Verb aspect, event structure, and coreferential
processing”, Journal of Memory and Language,
61(2): 191–205. (Scholar)
- Filip, H., 2008, “Events and Maximalization”, in Crosslinguistic Appraches to the Semantics of Aspect, S. Rothstein (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217–256. (Scholar)
- Gamut, L.T.F., 1991, Logic, Language and Meaning: Volume
II, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Gehrke, B., 2022, “Differences between Russian and
Czech in the use of aspect in narrative discourse and factual
contexts”, Languages, 7: 155. (Scholar)
- Gennari, S. and D. Poeppel, 2003, “Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity”, Cognition, 89(1): B27–B41. (Scholar)
- Grätzer, G. (1978). General Lattice Theory,
Basel/Boston/Berlin: Birkhäuser. (Scholar)
- Grondin, S. (ed.), 2008, Psychology of Time, Bingley, UK:
Emerald Group. (Scholar)
- Hanks, S. and D. McDermott, 1986, “Default reasoning,
nonmonotonic logic, and the frame problem”, Proceedings
AAAI, 86: 328–333. (Scholar)
- Heim, I., 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Scholar)
- Hendriks, P., 1993, Studied Flexibility. PhD thesis,
University of Amsterdam. (Scholar)
- Kamp, H., 1979, “Events, instants and temporal reference”, in Semantics from Different Points of View, R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, “The perfect and other tenses
in French and English”, in Tense and Aspect in English and
French, Dyana Deliverable R2. 3B, 41–64. (Scholar)
- Kamp, H. and U. Reyle, 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Kehler, A., L. Kertz, H. Rohde and J. Elman, 2008, “Coherence and coreference revisited”, Journal of Semantics, 25 (4): 1–44. (Scholar)
- Klimek-Jankowska, D. and J. Błaszczak,
2020, “How incremental is the processing of perfective and
imperfective aspect in Polish? An exploratory event-related potential
study”, Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 28(1):
23–69. (Scholar)
- Klimek-Jankowska, D., A. Czypionka, W. Witkowski and
J. Błaszczak, 2018, “The time course of
interpreting perfective and imperfective aspect in Polish—Evidence
from eyetracking and self-paced reading”, Acta
Linguistica Academica, 65(2-3): 293–351. (Scholar)
- Kowalski, R., 1995, “How to reconcile reactive and rational
agents”, in Meta-Logic and Logic Programming, Apt and
Turini (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Kowalski, R. A. and M. Sergot, 1986, “A logic-based calculus
of events”, New Generation Computing, 4(1):
67–95.
- Krifka, M., 1989, Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution,
Munich: Fink. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, “Thematic roles as links
between nominal reference and temporal constitution”, in
Lexical Matters, I. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Stanford,
CA: CSLI Publications, 29–53. (Scholar)
- Landman, F., 1992, “The progressive”, Natural Language Semantics, 1: 1–32. (Scholar)
- Lascarides, A. and N. Asher, 1993, “Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 16: 437–493. (Scholar)
- Lecarme, J., 2008, “Tense and modality in nominals”,
in Time and Modality, J. Guéron and J. Lecarme (eds.),
Springer, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. (Scholar)
- Lukassek, J., A. Prysłopska, R. Hörnig and C.
Maienborn, 2017, “The semantic processing of motion verbs:
Coercion or underspecification?”, Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 46: 805–825. (Scholar)
- Madden, C. and T. Ferretti, 2009, “Verb aspect and the
mental representation of situations”, in The expression of
time, W. Klein and P. Li (eds.), Berlin/New York: Mouton de
Gruyter, 217–240. (Scholar)
- Madden, C. and R. Zwaan, 2003, “How does verb aspect
constrain event representations?”, Memory &
Cognition, 31(5): 663–672. (Scholar)
- Martin, F., 2019, “Non-culminating
accomplishments”, Language and Linguistics
Compass, 13(8): e12346. (Scholar)
- McCarthy, J., 1977, “Epistemological problems of artificial
intelligence”, in Proceedings of IJACAI-77. (Scholar)
- McKoon, G. and T. Macfarland, 2002, “Event templates in the
lexical representations of verbs”, Cognitive
Psychology, 45(1): 1–44. (Scholar)
- McRae, K., K.S. Brown and J.L. Elman, 2021, “Prediction-based learning and processing of event knowledge”, Topics in Cognitive Science, 13(1): 206–223. (Scholar)
- Minor, S., N. Mitrofanova, G. Guajardo, M. Vos and G.
Ramchand, 2023, “Aspect processing across languages:
A visual world eye-tracking study”, Frontiers in
Language Sciences, 1: 1052205. (Scholar)
- Moens, M. and M. Steedman, 1988, “Temporal ontology and temporal reference”, Computational Linguistics, 14: 15–28. (Scholar)
- Naumann, R. and Ch. Piñón, 1997, “Decomposing
the progressive”, in Proceedings of the 11th
Amsterdam Colloquium, P. Dekker, M. Stokhof, and Y. Venema
(eds.), Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. (Scholar)
- Nienhuys-Cheng, S-H. and R. de Wolf, 1997, Foundations of Inductive Logic Programming, New York, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
- Oettinger, A., 1966, “The Uses of Computers in
Science”, Scientific American, 215: 166–169. (Scholar)
- Ogihara, T., 1990, “Semantics of the progressive and the
perfect in English”, in Dyana–Report R.2.5.A, H.
Kamp (ed.), ESPRIT Basic Research Project 6852. (Scholar)
- Paczynski, M., R. Jackendoff and G. Kuperberg,
2014, “When events change their nature:The neurocognitive
mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion”, Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(9): 1905–1917. (Scholar)
- Pagin, P. and D. Westerståhl, 2010a, “Compositionality i: Definitions and variants”, Philosophy Compass, 5: 250–264. (Scholar)
- Pagin, P. and D. Westerståhl, 2010b, “Compositionality ii: Arguments and problems”, Philosophy Compass, 5: 265–282. (Scholar)
- Parsons, T., 1989, “The progressive in English: Events, states and processes”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(2): 213–241. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Peters, S. and D. Westerståhl, 2006, Quantifiers in Language and Logic. Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Scholar)
- Pickering, M.J., B. McElree, S. Frisson, L. Chen, and M.J.
Traxler, 2006, “Underspecification and coercion”,
Discourse Processes, 42(2): 131–155. (Scholar)
- Piñango, M.M., E. Zurif, and R. Jackendoff, 1999,
“Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at
the syntax-semantics interface”, Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 28(4): 395–414. (Scholar)
- Prior, A., 1967, Past, Present, and Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Rabovsky, M., S.S. Hansen and J.L. McClelland,
2018, “Modelling the N400 brain potential as change in a
probabilistic representation of meaning”, Nature Human
Behaviour, 2: 693–705. (Scholar)
- Reichenbach, H., 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York: Dover Publications, Inc. (Scholar)
- Russell, B., 1914, Our Knowledge of the External World, London: Allen and Unwin. (Scholar)
- Shanahan, M., 1997, Solving the Frame Problem: A Mathematical Investigation of the Common Sense Law of Inertia, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Smith, C. S., 1991, The Parameter of Aspect, Dordrecht:
Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Spencer, A., 1991, Morphological Theory, Oxford:
Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Steedman, M., 1997, “Temporality”, in Handbook of
Logic and Language, J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.),
Amsterdam: Elsevier. (Scholar)
- Stenning, K. and M. van Lambalgen, 2005, “Semantic interpretation as computation in nonmonotonic logic: The real meaning of the suppression task”, Cognitive Science, 29(6): 919–960. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Thomason, S., 1986, “On constructing instants from events”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 13(1): 85–96. (Scholar)
- Todorova, M., K. Straub, W. Badecker, and R. Frank, 2000,
“Aspectual coercion and the online computation of sentential
aspect”, Proceedings of the CogSci 2000
Conference. (Scholar)
- van Lambalgen, M. and F. Hamm, 2005, The Proper Treatment of Events, Malden: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Vendler, Z., 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Venhuizen, N.J., M.W. Crocker and H. Brouwer,
2019, “Expectation-based comprehension: Modeling the
interaction of world knowledge and linguistic
experience”, Dicourse
Processes, 56(3): 229–255. (Scholar)
- Verkuyl, H., 1993, A Theory of Aspectability. The Interaction
between Temporal and Atemporal Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. (Scholar)
- von Stutterheim, C., M. Andermann, M. Carroll, M. Flecken, and B.
Schmiedtová, 2012, “How grammaticized concepts shape
event conceptualization in language production: Insights from
linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance”,
Linguistics, 50(4): 833–867. (Scholar)
- von Stutterheim, C., M. Carroll, and W. Klein, 2009, “New
perspectives in analyzing aspectual distinctions across
languages”, in The expression of time, W. Klein and P.
Li (eds.), Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 195–216. (Scholar)
- Walker, A. G., 1947, “Durées et instants”,
Revue Scientifique, 85: 131–134. (Scholar)
- Zacks, J.M., 2020, “Event perception and
memory”, Annual Review of Psychology, 71:
165–191. (Scholar)
- Zacks, J.M., K.M. Swallow, J.M. Vettel, and M.P. McAvoy, 2006,
“Visual motion and the neural correlates of event
perception”, Brain Research, 1076: 150–162. (Scholar)
- Zacks, J.M. and B. Tversky, 2001, “Event structure in
perception and conception”, Psychological Bulletin,
127: 3–21. (Scholar)
- Zacks, J.M., B. Tversky, and G. Iyer, 2001, “Perceiving, remembering and communicating structure in events”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130: 29–58. (Scholar)
- Zucchi, S., 1999, “Incomplete events, intensionality and imperfective aspect”, Natural Language Semantics, 7(2): 179–215. (Scholar)