Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Theophrastus" by Katerina Ierodiakonou

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Primary Literature: Texts, Translations, Commentaries

We use [FHS&G] to refer to:

Fortenbaugh, W.W., P.M. Huby, R.W. Sharples, and D. Gutas, 1992, Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, 2 vols., Leiden/Boston: Brill; reprinted 1993 with corrections.

Secondary Literature

  • Algra, K., 1992, “‘Place’ in context: on Theophrastus fr. 21 and 22 Wimmer”, in Fortenbaugh and Gutas 1992: 141–65. (Scholar)
  • Balme, D.M., 1962, “Development of biology in Aristotle and Theophrastus: Theory of spontaneous generation”, Phronesis, 7: 91–104. (Scholar)
  • Baltussen, H., 2000, Theophrastus against the Presocratics and Plato: Peripatetic Dialectic in the “De Sensibus”, Leiden/Boston: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Barbotin, E., 1954, La théorie aristotélicienne de l’intellect d’après Théophraste, Louvain: Publications universitaires de Louvain. (Scholar)
  • Barker, A., 1985, “Theophrastus on pitch and melody”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 289–324. (Scholar)
  • Barnes, J., 1985, “Theophrastus and hypothetical syllogistic”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 125–41. (Scholar)
  • Bobzien, S., 2000, “Wholly hypothetical syllogisms”, Phronesis, 45: 87–137. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “The development of modus ponens in antiquity: From Aristotle to the 2nd century AD”, Phronesis, 47: 359‒94. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Peripatetic hypothetical syllogistic in Galen”, Rhizai, 2: 57‒102. (Scholar)
  • Bocheński, I.M., 1947, La logique de Théophraste, Fribourg: Librairie de l’Université; reprinted 1987. (Scholar)
  • Bredlow, L.A., 2011, “Aristotle, Theophrastus, and Parmenides’ theory of cognition (B 16)”, Apeiron, 44: 219–63. (Scholar)
  • Brink, C.O., 1956, “Oikeiōsis and oikeiotēs; Theophrastus and Zeno on nature in moral theory”, Phronesis, 1: 123–45. (Scholar)
  • Browning Cole, E., 1992, “Theophrastus and Aristotle on animal intelligence”, in Fortenbaugh and Gutas 1992: 44–62. (Scholar)
  • Brunschwig, J., 1982, “‘Indéterminé’ et ‘indéfini’ dans la logique de Théophraste”, Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, 172: 359–70. (Scholar)
  • Daiber, H., 1985, “A survey of Theophrastean texts and ideas in Arabic”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 103–14. (Scholar)
  • Desautels, J., 1988, “La classification des végétaux dans la Recherche sur les plantes de Théophraste d’Erésos”, Phoenix, 42: 219–44. (Scholar)
  • Devereux, D.T., 1988, “The relationship between Theophrastus’ Metaphysics and Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lamda”, in Fortenbaugh and Sharples 1988: 167–88. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, “Theophrastus on the intellect”, in Fortenbaugh and Gutas 1992: 32–43. (Scholar)
  • Einarson, B., 1976, “The manuscripts of Theophrastus’ Historia plantarum”, Classical Philology, 71: 67–76. (Scholar)
  • Fortenbaugh, W.W., 1983, “Arius, Theophrastus, and the Eudemian Ethics”, in On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus, W.W. Fortenbaugh (ed.), Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. I, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 203–23; reprinted in Fortenbaugh 2003a: 109–30. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985a, “Theophrastus on emotion”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 209–29; reprinted in Fortenbaugh 2003a: 71–90. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985b, “Theophrastus on delivery”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 269–88; reprinted in Fortenbaugh 2003a: 253–71. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003a, Theophrastean Studies, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003b, “The Characters of Theophrastus, behavioral regularities and Aristotelian vices”, in Fortenbaugh 2003a: 131–45. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003c, “Theophrastus, the Characters and rhetoric”, in Fortenbaugh 2003a: 224–43. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003d, “Theophrastus on comic character”, in Fortenbaugh 2003a: 295–306. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Cicero as a reporter of Aristotelian and Theophrastean rhetorical doctrine”, Rhetorica, 23: 37–64; reprinted 2006, in Aristotle’s Practical Side, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 413–40. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Cicero’s Letter to Atticus 2.16 : ‘A great controversy’”, Classical World, 106: 483–6. (Scholar)
  • Fortenbaugh, W.W., P. Huby, and A.A. Long (eds.), 1985, Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work, Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. II, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. (Scholar)
  • Fortenbaugh, W.W. and R.W. Sharples (eds.), 1988, Theophrastean Studies: On Natural Science, Physics and Metaphysics, Ethics, Religion, and Rhetoric, Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. III, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. (Scholar)
  • Fortenbaugh, W.W. and D. Gutas (eds.), 1992, Theophrastus. His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings, Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. V, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. (Scholar)
  • Fortenbaugh, W.W. and G. Wörle (eds.), 2002, On the Opuscula of Theophrastus, Stuttgart: Steiner. (Scholar)
  • Fortenbaugh, W.W. and R. Harmon, 2006, “Theophrastus”, in Brill’s New Pauly, H. Cancik and H. Schneider (eds.), Brill Online. (Scholar)
  • Gigon, O., 1988, “The Peripatos in Cicero’s De finibus”, in Fortenbaugh and Sharples 1988: 259–71. (Scholar)
  • Gottschalk, H.B., 1967, review of “P. Steinmetz, 1964, Die Physik des Theophrastos von Eresos, Palingenesia 1, Bad Homburg v.d.H./Berlin/Zurich: Gehlen”, Gnomon, 39: 17–26.
  • –––, 1985, “Prolegomena to an edition of Theophrastus’ fragments”, in Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung, I, J. Wiesner (ed.), Berlin: De Gruyter, 543–56. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “Theophrastus and the Peripatos”, in van Ophuijsen and van Raalte 1998: 281–98. (Scholar)
  • Gutas, D., 1985, “The life, works, and sayings of Theophrastus in the Arabic tradition”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 63–102. (Scholar)
  • Huby, P., 1989, “Theophrastus and the criterion”, in The Criterion of Truth, P. Huby and G. Neal (eds.), Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 107–22. (Scholar)
  • Kneale, W. and M. Kneale, 1972, “Prosleptic propositions and arguments”, in Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, M.S. Stern, A. Hourani, and V. Brown (eds.), London: Bruno Cassireer, 189–207. (Scholar)
  • Innes, D., 1985, “Theophrastus and the theory of style”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 251–67. (Scholar)
  • Laks, A., 1990, “The More and the Full: On the reconstruction of Parmenides’ theory of sensation in Theophrastus, De Sensibus, 3–4”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 8: 1–18. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “La physique de la sensation aristotélicienne selon Théophraste (Physique, livre 5)”, in Le style de la pensée, M. Canto-Sperber and P. Pellegrin (eds.), Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 353–74. (Scholar)
  • Lejewski, C., 1961, “On prosleptic syllogisms”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2: 158–76. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1976, “On prosleptic premisses”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 17: 1–18. (Scholar)
  • Lennox, J., 1985, “Theophrastus on the limits of teleology”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 143–63. (Scholar)
  • Long, A.A., 1996, “Theophrastus’s De sensibus on Plato”, in Polyhistor: Papers Offered to J. Mansfeld on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, K.A. Algra, P. van der Horst, and D.T. Runia (eds.), Leiden/Boston: Brill, 345–62. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “Theophrastus and the Stoa”, in van Ophuijsen and van Raalte 1998: 355–83. (Scholar)
  • Longrigg, J., 1975, “Elementary physics in the Lyceum and Stoa”, Isis, 66(2): 211–29. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993, Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Mansfeld, J., 1992, “Physikai doxai and Problēmata physika from Aristotle to Aëtius (and beyond)”, in Fortenbaugh and Gutas 1992: 63–111; reprinted in Mansfeld and Runia 2009: 33–98. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996, “Aristote et la structure du De sensibus de Théophraste”, Phronesis, 41: 158–88; reprinted in Mansfeld and Runia 2009: 203–36. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “Doxographical studies, Quellenforschung, tabular presentation and other varieties of comparativism”, in Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer Texte der Antike—Le raccolte dei frammenti di filosofi antichi, W. Burkert, L. Gemelli Marciano, E. Matelli and L. Orelli (eds.), Aporemata 3, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 16–40; reprinted in Mansfeld and Runia 2009: 3–32. (Scholar)
  • Mansfeld, J. and D.T. Runia, 2009, Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. Vol. 3: Studies in the Doxographical Traditions of Ancient Philosophy, Philosophia antiqua 118, Leiden/Boston: Brill. (Scholar)
  • McDiarmid, J.B., 1953, “Theophrastus on the Presocratic causes”, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 61: 85–156. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1959a, “Plato in Theophrastus’ De sensibus”, Phronesis, 4: 59–70. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1959b, “Theophrastus’ De sensibus 66: Democritus’ explanation of salinity”, American Journal of Philology, 80: 56–66. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1960, “Theophrastus’ De sensibus 61–62: Democritus’ theory of weight”, Classical Philology, 55: 28–30. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1962, “The manuscripts of Theophrastus’ De sensibus”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 44: 1–32. (Scholar)
  • Mignucci, M., 1998, “Theophrastus’ logic”, in van Ophuijsen and van Raalte 1998: 39–65. (Scholar)
  • Millett, P., 2007, Theophrastus and his World, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, Supplementary volume 33, Cambridge. (Scholar)
  • Morison, B., 2010, “Did Theophrastus reject Aristotle’s account of place?”, Phronesis, 55: 68–103. (Scholar)
  • Most, G.W., 1988, “The relative date of Theophrastus’ Metaphysics”, in A. Laks, G.W. Most and E. Rudolp, “Four notes on Theophrastus’ Metaphysics”, in Fortenbaugh and Sharples 1988: 224–33. (Scholar)
  • van Ophuijsen, J.M. and M. van Raalte (eds.), 1998, Theophrastus. Reappraising the Sources, Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. VIII, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. (Scholar)
  • Podlecki, A., 1985, “Theophrastus on history and politics”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 231–49. (Scholar)
  • Pötscher, W., 1964, Theophrastos. ΠΕΡΙ ΕΥΣΕΒΕΙΑΣ, Leiden/Boston: Brill. (Scholar)
  • van Raalte, M., 1988, “The idea of the cosmos as an organic whole”, in Fortenbaugh and Sharples 1988: 189–215. (Scholar)
  • Repici, L., 1990, “Limits of teleology in Theophrastus’ Metaphysics”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 72: 182–213. (Scholar)
  • Runia, D.T., 1989, “Aristotle and Theophrastus conjoined in the writings of Cicero”, in Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos, W. Fortenbaugh and P. Steinmetz (eds.), Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. IV, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 23–38. (Scholar)
  • Schofield, M., 2002, “Leucippus, Democritus and the ou mallon principle: An examination of Theophrastus Phys. Op. Fr. 8”, Phronesis, 47: 253–63. (Scholar)
  • Schmitt, C.B., 1971, “Theophrastus in the Middle Ages”, Viator, 2: 251–70. (Scholar)
  • Sedley, D., 1985, “Three notes on Theophrastus’ treatment of tastes and smells”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 205–7. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, “Empedocles’ theory of vision and Theophrastus’ De sensibus”, in Fortenbaugh and Gutas 1992: 20–31. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “Theophrastus and Epicurean physics”, in van Ophuijsen and van Raalte 1998: 331–54. (Scholar)
  • Sharples, R.W., 1985a, “Theophrastus on the heavens”, in Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung, I, J. Wiesner (ed.), Berlin: De Gruyter, 577–93. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985b, “Theophrastus on tastes and smells”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby and Long 1985: 183–204. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1988, “Theophrastus as philosopher and Aristotelian”, in van Ophuijsen and van Raalte 1998: 267–80. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “Common to body and soul: Peripatetic approaches after Aristotle”, in Common to Body and Soul. Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, R. King (ed.), Berlin: De Gruyter, 165–86. (Scholar)
  • Sicking, C.M.J., 1998, “Theophrastus on the nature of music (716 FHS&G)”, in van Ophuijsen and van Raalte 1998: 97–142. (Scholar)
  • Sollenberger, M., 1985, “Diogenes Laertius 5.36–57 : The Vita Theophrasti”, in Fortenbaugh, Huby, and Long 1985: 1–62 (Scholar)
  • Sorabji, R., 1988, “Theophrastus on place”, in Fortenbaugh and Sharples 1988: 139–66. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “Is Theophrastus a significant philosopher?”, in van Ophuijsen and van Raalte 1998: 203–21. (Scholar)
  • Steinmetz, P., 1964, Die Physik des Theophrastos von Eresos, Palingenesia 1, Bad Homburg v.d.H./Berlin/Zurich: Gehlen. (Scholar)
  • Szegedy-Maszak, A., 1981, The “Nomoi” of Theophrastus, New York: Arno. (Scholar)
  • Wehrli, F., 1983 and 2004, “Theophrastos”, in F. Ueberweg, Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, H. Flashar (ed.), vol. 3.1–2, Basel: Schwabe, 474–522 and 506–57. (Scholar)
  • Wilson, N.G., 1962, “The Manuscripts of Theophrastus”, Scriptorium, 16(1): 96–102. (Scholar)
  • Wöhrle, G., 1985, Theophrasts Methode in seinen botanischen Schriften, Amsterdam: Grüner. (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 19 11:25:30 2019