Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Turing Test" by Graham Oppy and David Dowe

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Abramson, D., 2008, “Turing’s Responses to Two Objections,” Minds and Machines, 18: 147–67. (Scholar)
–––, 2011a, “Descartes’ Influence on Turing,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42: 544–551. (Scholar)
–––, 2011b, “Philosophy of Mind is (in Part) Philosophy of Computer Science,” Minds and Machines, 21: 203–219. (Scholar)
Arnold, T. and Scheutz, M., 2016, “Against the Moral Turing Test: Accountable Design and the Moral Reasoning of Autonomous Systems,” Ethics and Information Technology, 18: 103–15. (Scholar)
Barone, P., et al., 2020 “A Minimal Turing Test: Reciprocal Sensorimotor Contingencies for Interaction Detection,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14. (Scholar)
Block, N., 1981, “Psychologism and Behaviorism,” Philosophical Review, 90: 5–43. (Scholar)
Boolos, G. and Jeffrey, R., 1980, Computability and Logic, Second Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Bowie, L., 1982, “Lucas’s Number is Finally Up,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11: 279–85. (Scholar)
Braddon-Mitchell, D. and Jackson, F., 1996, The Philosophy of Mind and Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Bringsjord, S., Bello, P. and Ferrucci, D., 2001, “Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (Better) Lovelace Test,” Minds and Machines, 11: 3–27. (Scholar)
Brooks, R., 1990, “Elephants Don’t Play Chess,” Robotics and Autonomous Signals, 6: 3–15. (Scholar)
Chalmers, D., 1995, “On Implementing a Computation,” Minds and Machines, 4: 391–402. (Scholar)
Churchland, P. M. and Churchland, P. S., 1990, “Could a Machine Think?” Scientific American, 262 (1): 32–37. (Scholar)
Clark, A., 1997, Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Cooper, S. and van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) 2013, Alan Turing: His Work and Impact, London: Elsevier. (Scholar)
Copeland, J. (ed.), 1999, “A Lecture and Two Radio Broadcasts on Machine Intelligence by Alan Turing,” in K. Furukawa, D. Michie, and S. Muggleton (eds.), Machine Intelligence 15, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “The Turing Test,” Minds and Machines, 10: 519–39. (Scholar)
Copeland, J. and Sylvan, R., 1999, “Beyond the Universal Turing Machine,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77: (1): 46–66. (Scholar)
Copeland, J., et al. (eds.), 2017, The Turing Guide, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Crooke, A., 2002, Confabulating Consciousness, Ph.D. Dissertation, Philosophy Department, Monash University. (Scholar)
Crosby, M., 2020, “Building Thinking Machines by Solving Animal Cognition Tasks,” Minds and Machines, 30: 589–615. (Scholar)
Cullen, J., 2009, “Imitation Versus Communication: Testing for Human-Like Intelligence,” Minds and Machines, 19: 237–54. (Scholar)
Damassino, N., 2020, “The Questioning Turing Test,” Minds and Machines, 30: 563–87. (Scholar)
–––, and Novelli, N., 2020, “Rethinking, Reworking and Revolutionising the Turing Test,” Minds and Machines, 30: 463–8. (Scholar)
Davidson, D., 1990, “Turing’s Test,” in K. Said, (ed.), Modelling the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–11. (Scholar)
Dennett, D., 1985, “Can Machines Think?” in M. Shafto (ed.), How We Know, Cambridge, MA: Harper and Row. (Scholar)
Dietrich, E. (ed.), 1994, Thinking Computers and Virtual Persons: Essays on the Intentionality of Machines, San Diego: Academic Press. (Scholar)
Dreyfus, H & Dreyfus, S., 1986, Mind Over Machine, New York: Free Press. (Scholar)
Epstein, R. et al. 2009, Parsing the Turing Test Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
Erion, G., 2001, “The Cartesian Test for Automatism,” Minds and Machines, 11: 29–39. (Scholar)
Feferman, S., 1996, “Penrose’s Gödelian Argument,”, Psyche, 2: 21–32. (Scholar)
Floridi, L., Taddeo, M., and Turilli, M., 2008, “Turing’s Imitation Game: Still an Impossible Challenge for all Machines and some Judges,”, Minds and Machines, 19: 145–50. (Scholar)
Floridi, L. and Chiriatti, N. (2020) “GPT-3: It’s Nature, Scope, Limits and Consequences,” Minds and Machines, 30: 681–94. (Scholar)
French, R., 1990, “Subcognition and the Limits of the Turing Test,” Mind, 99: 53–65. (Scholar)
French, R., 2000, “The Turing Test: The First Fifty Years Trends in Cognitive Sciences,” 4: 115–21. (Scholar)
Genova, J., 1994, “Turing’s Sexual Guessing Game,” Social Epistemology, 8: 313–26. (Scholar)
Gerdes, A. and Øhstrøm, P., 2015, “Issues in Robot Ethics Seen Through the Lens of a Moral Turing Test,” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 13: 98–109. (Scholar)
Gunderson, K., 1964, “Descartes, La Mettrie, Language and Machines,” Philosophy, 39: 193–222. (Scholar)
–––, 1985, Mentality and Machines, 2nd edition, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
Harnad, S., 1989, “Minds, Machines and Searle,” Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence, 1: 5–25. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, “Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem,” Minds and Machines, 1: 43–54. (Scholar)
Harnad, S. and Dror, I., 2006, “Distributed Cognition, Cognising, Autonomy and the Turing Test,” Pragmatics and Cognition, 14: 209–13. (Scholar)
Haugeland, J., 1981, “Semantic Engines: An Introduction to Mind Design,” in J. Haugeland (ed.), Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–34. (Scholar)
Hauser, L., 1993, “Reaping the Whirlwind: Reply to Harnad’s Other Bodies, Other Minds,” Minds and Machines, 3: 219–38. (Scholar)
Hauser, L., 2001, “Look Who’s Moving the Goalposts Now,” Minds and Machines, 11: 41–51. (Scholar)
Hayes, P., and Ford, K., 1995, “Turing Test Considered Harmful,” Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal: Morgan Kaufmann, 972–977. (Scholar)
Hernández-Orallo, J., 2000, “Beyond the Turing Test,” Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 9: 447–66. (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Twenty Years Beyond the Turing Test: Moving Beyond the Human Judges,” Minds and Machines, 30: 533–62. (Scholar)
Hernández-Orallo, J. and Dowe, D. L., 2010, “Measuring Universal Intelligence: Towards an Anytime Intelligence Test,” Artificial Intelligence, 174: 1508–39. (Scholar)
Hodges, A., 1983, Alan Turing: The Enigma, London: Burnett with Hutchinson. (Scholar)
Hofstadter, D., 1982, “The Turing Test: A Coffee-House Conversation,” in D. Hofstadter and D. Dennett (eds.), The Mind’s I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul, London: Penguin, 69–95. (Scholar)
Kobosko, S., et al., 2013 “Passing an Enhanced Turing Test: Interacting with Lifelike Computer Representations of Specific Individuals,” Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22: 365–415. (Scholar)
Korukonda, A., 2003, “Taking Stock of the Turing Test: A Review, Analysis and Appraisal of Issues Surrounding Thinking Machines,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58: 240–57. (Scholar)
Kulikov, V., 2020, “Preferential Engagement: What can we Learn from Online Chess?,” Minds and Machines, 30: 617–36. (Scholar)
Leavitt, D., 2007, The Man Who Knew Too Much: Alan Turing and the Invention of the Computer London: Phoenix. (Scholar)
Levesque, H., 2017, Commonsense, the Turing Test, and the Quest for Real AI, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Lewis, D., 1969, “Lucas against mechanism,” Philosophy, 44: 231–233. (Scholar)
–––, 1979, “Lucas against mechanism II,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 9: 373–376. (Scholar)
Lucas, J., 1961, “Minds, Machines and Gödel,” Philosophy, 36: 120–4. (Scholar)
Lupowski, P., 2011, “A Formal Approach to Exploring the Interrogator’s Perspective in the Turing Test,” Logical and Logical Philosophy 20: 139–58. (Scholar)
Lupowski, P. and Jurowska, P., 2019, “Minimum Intelligent Signal Test as an Alternative to the Turing Test,” Diametros, 59: 35–47. (Scholar)
Lyre, H. 2020, “The State Space of Artificial Intelligence”, Minds and Machines, 30: 325–47. (Scholar)
Mallory, F. 2020, “In Defence of a Reciprocal Turing Test,” Minds and Machines, 30: 659–80. (Scholar)
Marcus, G., 2020 “The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligence,” arXiv:2002.06177. (Scholar)
Marquis, P., et al. (eds.), 2020, A Guided Tour of Artificial Intelligence Research, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
Masum, H., Christensen, S., and Oppacher, F., 2003, “The Turing Ratio: A Framework for Open-Ended Task Metrics,” Journal of Evolution and Technology, 13(2), available online. (Scholar)
McDermott, D., 2014, “On the Claim that a Look-Up Table Program could Pass the Turing Test,” Minds and Machines, 24: 143–88. (Scholar)
Millican, P. and Clark, A., (eds.), 1999, Machines and Thought: The Legacy of Alan Turing, two volumes, Oxford: Clarendon. (Scholar)
Moor, J., 1976, “An Analysis of Turing’s Test,” Philosophical Studies, 30: 249–57. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “The Status and Future of the Turing Test,” Minds and Machines, 11: 77–93. (Scholar)
___, ed., 2003 The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
Neufeld, E. and Finnestad, S., 2020a, “In Defense of the Turing Test,” AI and Society 35: 819–27. (Scholar)
Neufeld, E. and Finnestad, S., 2020b, “Imitation Game: Threshold or Watershed?,” Minds and Machines, 30: 637–57. (Scholar)
Pautz, A. and Stoljar, D. (eds.), 2019, Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Penrose, R., 1989, The Emperor’s New Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Piccinini, G., 2000, “Turing’s Rules for the Imitation Game,” Minds and Machines, 10: 573–85. (Scholar)
Proudfoot, D., 2013, “Rethinking Turing’s Test,” Journal of Philosophy, 110: 391–411. (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Rethinking Turing’s Test and the Philosophical Implications,” Minds and Machines, 30: 487–512. (Scholar)
Proudfoot, D. and Copeland, J. 2008 “Turing’s Test: A Philosophical and Historical Guide,” in R. Epstein et al., (eds.), Parsing the Turing Test: Philosophical and Methodological Issues, Dordrecht: Springer, 119–38. (Scholar)
Rapaport, W., 2000, “How to Pass a Turing Test: Syntactic Semantics, Natural-Language Understanding, and First-Person Cognition,” Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 9: 467–90. (Scholar)
Saygin, A., Cicekli, I., and Akman, V., 2000, “Turing Test: 50 Years Later,” Minds and Machines, 10: 463–518. (Scholar)
Schweizer, P., 1998, “The Truly Total Turing Test,” Minds and Machines, 8: 263–72. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “The Externalist Foundation of a Truly Total Turing Test,” Minds and Machines, 22: 191–212. (Scholar)
Searle, J., 1981, “Minds, Brains, and Programs,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 417–57. (Scholar)
Shah, H. and Warwick, K., 2010, “Hidden Interlocutor Misidentification in Practical Turing Tests,” Minds and Machines, 203: 441–54. (Scholar)
Shieber, S., 1994, “Lessons from a restricted Turing Test,” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 37: 70–8. [Preprint available online]. (Scholar)
–––, (ed.), 2004, The Turing Test: Verbal Behaviour as the Mark of Intelligence, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “The Turing Test as Interactive Proof,” Noûs, 41: 686–713. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “There can be no Turing-Test-Passing Memory Machines,” Philosophers’ Imprint, 14: 1–13. (Scholar)
Sparrow, R., 2004, “The Turing Triage Test,” Ethics and Information Technology, 6: 203–13. (Scholar)
Srinivasan, B. and Shah, K., 2019, “Towards a Unified Framework for Developing Ethical and Practical Turing Tests,” AI and Society, 34: 145–52. (Scholar)
Sterrett, S., 2000, “Turing’s Two Tests for Intelligence,” Minds and Machines, 10: 541–59. (Scholar)
Sterrett, S., 2020, “The Genius of the ‘Original Imitation Game’ Test,” Minds and Machines, 30: 469–86. (Scholar)
Traiger, S., 2000, “Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test,” Minds and Machines, 10: 561–572. (Scholar)
Turing, A., 1950, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” Mind, 59 (236): 433–60. (Scholar)
Turing, A. 1992, The Collected Works of A. M. Turing, edited by P. Furbank, London: North-Holland. (Scholar)
Warwick, K. et al., 2013, “Some Implications of a Sample of Practical Turing Tests,” Minds and Machines, 23: 163–77. (Scholar)
Weizenbaum, J., 1966, “ELIZA-A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Men and Machines,” Communications of the ACM, 9: 36–45. (Scholar)
Wheeler, M., 2020 “Deceptive Appearances: The Turing Test, Response Dependence, and Intelligence as an Emotional Concept,” Minds and Machines 30: 513–32. (Scholar)
Whitby, B., 1996, “The Turing Test: AI’s Biggest Blind Alley?” in P. Millican and A. Clark (eds.), Machines and Thought: The Legacy of Alan Turing, Volume 1, Oxford: Clarendon. (Scholar)
Zdenek, S., 2001, “Passing Loebner’s Turing Test: A Case of Conflicting Discourse Functions,” Minds and Machines, 11: 53–76. (Scholar)

Generated Tue Dec 10 02:35:47 2024

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...