A. Primary Sources

• Opera logica, Venice, 1578.
• Tabula logicae, Venice, 1580.
• In duos Aristotelis libros Posteriores Analyticos comentarii, Venice, 1582.
• De doctrinae ordine apologia, Venice, 1584.
• De rebus naturalibus libri XXX, Cologne, 1590.
• In libros Aristotelis Physicorum commentarii, Venice, 1601.
• Commentarii in magni Aristotelis libros physicorum, item in libros de generatione & corruptione, item in meteora, Frankfurt, 1602.
• In tres libros Aristotelis De anima commentarii, Venice, 1605.

Modern editions and translations

• Opera logica, Minerva: Frankfurt 1966 (facsimile of Frankfurt-edition 1608). (Scholar)
• On methods, books I–II, vol. 1, edited and translated by John P. McCaskey, The I Tatti Renaissance Library, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press 2013.
• On methods, books III–IV, On regressus, vol. 2, edited and translated by John P. McCaskey, The I Tatti Renaissance Library, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press 2013.
• De rebus naturalibus, volumes 1–2, edited by José Manuel García Valverde, (Brill Texts and Sources in Intellectual History 17/1–2), Leiden and Boston: Brill 2016.

B. Secondary Sources

• Backus, Irena, 1989, “The Teaching of Logic in Two Protestant Academies at the End of the 16th Century. The Reception of Zabarella in Strasbourg and Geneva,” Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte, 80: 240–251. (Scholar)
• Baker, Tawrin, 2014, “Color, Cosmos, Oculus: Vision, Color, and the Eye in Jacopo Zabarella and Hieronymus Fabricius Ab Aquapendente,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Indiana, Bloomington. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “Colour in Three Seventeenth-Century Scholastic Textbooks,” in M. Bushart and F. Steinle (eds.), Colour Histories: Science, Art, and Technology in the 17th and 18th Centuries, Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 161–78. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “Why All This Jelly? Jacopo Zabarella and Hieronymus Fabricius Ab Aquapendente on the Usefulness of the Vitreous Humor,” in P. Distelzweig, B. I. Goldberg, and E. Ragland (eds.), Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy, New York: Springer, pp. 59–88. (Scholar)
• Berti, Enrico, 1992, “Metafisica e diallectica nel ‘Commento’ di Giacomo Zabarella agli ‘Analitici posteriori’,” Giornale di metafisica (new series), 14: 225–244. (Scholar)
• Biard, Joël, 2005, “Tradition et innovation dans les commentaires de la Physique: l’exemple de Jacques Zabarella,” in Alfredo Perifano (sous la direction de): La transmission des savoirs au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance, vol. 2, Besancon-Paris: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté, pp. 289–300. (Scholar)
• Blank, Andreas, 2015, “Jacopo Zabarella and the Early Leibniz on the Diachronic Identity of Living Beings,” Studia Leibnitiana, 47(1): 86–102. (Scholar)
• Bouillon, Dominique, 1998–99, “Un discours inédit de Iacopo Zabarella préliminaire à l’exposition de la ‘Physique’ d’Aristote (Padoue 1568),” Atti e Memorie dell’Accadema Galileiana di Scienze, Letter ed Arti in Padova, 111(3): 119–127. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, L’interprétation de Jacques Zabarella le Philosophe, Paris: Garnier.
• Claessens, Guy, 2012, “Francesco Piccolomini on Prime Matter and Extension,” Vivarium, 50: 225–244. (Scholar)
• Cuttini, Elisa, 2014, Natura, morale e seconda natura nell’aristotelismo di Giacomo Zabarella e John Case. Collana di Scienze dell’Interpretazione, Padua: Cleup. (Scholar)
• Dal Pra, Mario, 1966, “Un ‘oratio’ programmatica di G.Zabarella,” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 21: 286–291. (Scholar)
• Edwards, W.F., 1960, The Logic of Iacopo Zabarella (1533–1589), Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University. (Scholar)
• –––, 1969, “Jacopo Zabarella: A Renaissance Aristotelian’s View of Rhetoric and Poetry and their Relation to Philosophy,” in Arts libéraux et philosophie au Moyen Äge, Montréal-Paris, pp. 843–854. (Scholar)
• Hattab, Helen, 2014, “Hobbes’s and Zabarella’s Methods: A Missing Link,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 52(3): 461–85. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, “Methods of Teaching or Discovery? Analysis and Synthesis from Zabarella to Spinoza,” in M. Feingold and A. Sangiacomo (eds.), History of Universities Volume XXXIII/2, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 85–112. (Scholar)
• Heßbrüggen-Walter, Stefan, 2014, “Problems with Rhubarb: Accommodating Experience in Aristotelian Theories of Science,” Early Science and Medicine, 19(4): 317–40. (Scholar)
• Jardine, Nicholas, 1988, “Epistemology of the Sciences,” in C.B.Schmitt, et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 685–711. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, “Keeping Order in the School of Padua: Jacopo Zabarella and Francesco Piccolomini on the Offices of Philosophy,” in D. DiLiscia, E. Kessler and C. Methuen (eds.), Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature. The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, Aldershot: Ashgate: pp. 183–209. (Scholar)
• Kessler, Eckhard, 1988, “The Intellective Soul,” in C.B. Schmitt, et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 485–534. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, “Zabarella, Jacopo (1533–1589),” in E.Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Volume 9), London and New York: Routledge, pp. 836–839. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Alexander of Aphrodisias and his Doctrine of the Soul. 1400 Years of Lasting Significance,” Early Science and Medicine, 16: 1–93. (Scholar)
• Kusukawa, Sachiko, 2002, “Meditations of Zabarella in Nortern Europe: the Preface of Johann Ludwig Hawenreuter,” in Gregorio Piaia (a cura di), La presenza dell’aristotelismo padovano nella filosofia della prima modernità, Roma-Padova: Editrice Antenore, pp. 199–213. (Scholar)
• Lærke, Mogens, 2019, “Form, Figure, and Two Types of Extended Being,” in D. Rutherford (ed.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy (Volume IX), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 131–65. (Scholar)
• Laird W.R., 1983, The ‘Scientiae Mediae’ in Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s ‘Posterior Analytics’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, “Zabarella, Jacopo (1533–1589),” in W. Applebaum (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Scientific Revolution from Copernicus to Newton, New York and London: Garland, p. 695. (Scholar)
• Landgren, Per, 2016, “Reviews of Jacopo Zabarella, On methods, books I–IV; De regressus” History of Universities, 29: 194–202. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Jacopo Zabarella (1533–1589): On the Constitution of Natural Science,” in J. G. Snyder and P. R. Blum (eds.), Philosophy in the Renaissance, Washington D.C., Catholic University of America Press, pp. 270–279. (Scholar)
• Lines, David A., 2001, “Natural Philosophy in Renaissance Italy: The University of Bologna and the Beginnings of Specialization,” Early Science and Medicine, 6(4): 267–323. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, Aristotle’s Ethics in the Italian Renaissance (ca. 1300–1650). The Universities and the Problem of Moral Education, Leiden, Boston and Köln: Brill. (Scholar)
• Maclean, Ian, 2002, “Meditations of Zabarella in Northern Germany, 1586–1623,” in Gregorio Piaia (a cura di), La presenza dell’aristotelismo padovano nella filosofia della prima modernitá, Roma-Padova: Editrice Antenore, pp. 173–198 (Scholar)
• Martin, Craig, 2007, “Rethinking Renaissance Aristotelianism,” Intellectua History Review, 17(1): 3–19. (Scholar)
• McCaskey, John P., 2006, “Regula Socratis: The Rediscovery of Ancient Induction in Early Modern England,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University. (Scholar)
• Mikkeli, Heikki, 1992, An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism. Jacopo Zabarella on the Nature of Arts and Sciences, Helsinki: Finnish Historical Society. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, “The Foundation of An Autonomous Natural Philosophy: Zabarella on the Classification of Arts and Sciences,” in D. DiLiscia, E. Kessler and C. Methuen (eds.), Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature. The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 211–228. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Jacopo Zabarella (1533–1589). Ordnung und Methode der wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis,” in Paul Richard Blum (ed.), Philosophen der Renaissance, Darmstadt: Primus Verlag, pp. 150–160. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Zabarella and Piccolomini in Scandinavian Countries in the Seventeenth Century,” in Gregorio Piaia (a cura di), La presenza dell-aristotelismo padovano nella filosofia della prima modernità, Roma-Padova: Editrice Antenore, pp. 257–272. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, “Jacopo Zabarella (1533–1589): The Structure and Method of Scientific Knowledge,” in Paul Richard Blum (ed.), Philosophers of the Renaissance, Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, pp. 181–191. (Scholar)
• Miller, David Marshall, 2018, “Regressus and Empiricism in the Controversy about Galileo’s Lunar Observations,” Perspectives on Science, 26(3): 293–324. (Scholar)
• Mitrovic, Branko, 2009, “Defending Alexander of Aphrodisias in the Age of the Counter-Reformation: Iacopo Zabarella on the Mortality of the Soul according to Aristotle,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 91: 330–354. (Scholar)
• Palmieri, Paolo, 2007, “Science and Authority in Giacomo Zabarella,” History of Science, 45: 404–427. (Scholar)
• Poppi, Antonino, 1972, La dottrina della scienza in Giacomo Zabarella, Padova: Editrice Antenore. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, “La struttura del discorso morale nell’opera di Iacopo Zabarella,” in Antonino Poppi, L’etica del rinascimento tra Platone e Aristotele, Napoli: La Città del Sole, pp. 231–246. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “Iacopo Zabarella o l’aristotelismo come scienza rigorosa,” in Antonino Poppi, Ricerche sulla teologia e la scienza nella Scuola padovana del Cinque e Seicento, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino Editore, pp. 125–152. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “Metodo e tecnica in Iacopo Zabarella,” in Antonino Poppi, Ricerche sulla teologia e la scienza nella Scuola padovana del Cinque e Seicento, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino Editore, pp. 153–166. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Zabarella, or Aristotelianism as a Rigorous Science,” in Riccardo Pozzo (ed.), The Impact of Aristotelianism on Modern Science, Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, pp. 35–63. (Scholar)
• Pozzo, Riccardo, 1998, “Res considerata and modus considerandi rem: Averroes, Aquinas, Jacopo Zabarella, and Cornelius Martini on Reduplication,” Medioevo, 24: 151–175. (Scholar)
• Randall, J.H., 1961, The School of Padua and the Emergence of Modern Science, Padova: Editrice Antenore. (Scholar)
• Risse, Wilhelm, 1983, “Zabarellas Methodenlehre,” in L.Olivieri (a cura di), Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna, Padova: Editrice Antenore, pp. 155–172. (Scholar)
• Rossi, Paolo, 1983, “Aristotelici e ‘moderni’: le ipotesi e la natura,” in L. Olivieri (a cura di), Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna, Padova: Editrice Antqenore, pp. 125–154. (Scholar)
• Schmitt, C.B., 1969, “Experience and Experiment: A Comparison of Zabarella’s View with Galileo’s in De motu,” Studies in the Renaissance, 16: 80–138. (Scholar)
• –––, 1988, “The Rise of the Philosophical Textbook,” in C. B. Schmitt, Q. Skinner, E. Kessler, and J. Kraye (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 792–804. (Scholar)
• Sgarbi, Marco, 2010, La ‘Kritik der reinen Vernunft’ nel contesto della tradizione logica aristotelica (Studien und Materialen zur Geschichte der Philosophie, Band 80), Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Towards a Reassessment of British Aristotelianism,” Vivarium, 50: 85–109. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, The Aristotelian Tradition and the Rise of British Empiricism: Logic and Epistemology in the British Isles (1570–1689) (Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 32), Dordrecht and London: Springer Verlag. (Scholar)
• Soler, Jorge Leoncio, 1971, “The Psychology of Iacopo Zabarella (1533–1589),” Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo. (Scholar)
• South, James B., 2002, “Zabarella and the Intentionality of Sensation,” Rivista di storia della filosofia, 57: 5–25. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Zabarella, Prime Matter, and the Theory of Regressus,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 26: 79–98. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Aspects of Intentionality in Two 16th Century Aristotelians,” Gregorianum, 98(4): 725–41. (Scholar)
• Suitner, Riccarda, 2016, “Radical Reformation and Medicine in the Late Renaissance: The Case of the University of Padua,” Nuncius, 31(1): 11–31. (Scholar)
• Valverde, J. M. García, 2012, “El comentario Giacomo Zabarella a De anima III,5: una interpretacíon mortalista de la psicología de Aristoteles,” Ingenium, 6: 27–56. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Giacomo Zabarella: Un Aristotélico Crítico En La Era de La Revolución Científica,” Anales Del Seminario de Historia de La Filosofía, 34(3): 587–609. (Scholar)
• Vasoli, Cesare, 2011, “Jacopo Zabarella e la ‘natura’ della logica,” Rivista di storia della filosofia (new series), 66: 1–22. (Scholar)
• Wallace, William A., 1988, “Randall Redivivus: Galileo and the Paduan Aristotelians,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 49(1): 133–49. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof: The Background, Content, and Use of His Appropriated Treatises On Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Zabarella, Jacopo,” in Paul F. Grendler (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Renaissance (Volume 6), New York: Scribner, pp. 337–339. (Scholar)