Sign in
|
Create an account
PhilPapers
PhilPeople
PhilArchive
PhilEvents
PhilJobs
Syntax
Advanced Search
New
All new items
Books
Journal articles
Manuscripts
Topics
All Categories
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Epistemology
Metaphilosophy
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Religion
M&E, Misc
Value Theory
Value Theory
Aesthetics
Applied Ethics
Meta-Ethics
Normative Ethics
Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
Philosophy of Law
Social and Political Philosophy
Value Theory, Miscellaneous
Science, Logic, and Mathematics
Science, Logic, and Mathematics
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Biology
Philosophy of Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Computing and Information
Philosophy of Mathematics
Philosophy of Physical Science
Philosophy of Social Science
Philosophy of Probability
General Philosophy of Science
Philosophy of Science, Misc
History of Western Philosophy
History of Western Philosophy
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
17th/18th Century Philosophy
19th Century Philosophy
20th Century Philosophy
History of Western Philosophy, Misc
Philosophical Traditions
Philosophical Traditions
African/Africana Philosophy
Asian Philosophy
Continental Philosophy
European Philosophy
Philosophy of the Americas
Philosophical Traditions, Miscellaneous
Philosophy, Misc
Philosophy, Misc
Philosophy, Introductions and Anthologies
Philosophy, General Works
Teaching Philosophy
Philosophy, Miscellaneous
Other Academic Areas
Other Academic Areas
Natural Sciences
Social Sciences
Cognitive Sciences
Formal Sciences
Arts and Humanities
Professional Areas
Other Academic Areas, Misc
Journals
Submit material
Submit a book or article
Upload a bibliography
Personal page tracking
Archives we track
Information for publishers
More
Introduction
Submitting to PhilPapers
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscriptions
Editor's Guide
The Categorization Project
For Publishers
For Archive Admins
Contact us
PhilPapers Surveys
API
Bargain Finder
About PhilPapers
Syntax
Advanced Search
Sign in
Create an account
The PhilPapers Surveys
Preliminary Survey results
(
Back to contents
)
Note: set response grain to "fine" for details on "other" responses.
Population
AOS
Response details
All respondents
Target faculty
Philosophy faculty or PhD
Philosophy faculty/PhD, non-target
Philosophy graduate student
Philosophy undergraduate
No philosophy affiliation listed
All respondents
17th/18th Century Philosophy
19th Century Philosophy
20th Century Philosophy
Aesthetics
African/Africana Philosophy
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
Applied Ethics
Arts and Humanities
Asian Philosophy
Cognitive Sciences
Continental Philosophy
Decision Theory
Epistemology
Formal Sciences
General Philosophy of Science
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
Meta-Ethics
Metaphilosophy
Metaphysics
Natural Sciences
Normative Ethics
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Biology
Philosophy of Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Computing and Information
Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Law
Philosophy of Mathematics
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Physical Science
Philosophy of Probability
Philosophy of Religion
Philosophy of Social Science
Philosophy of the Americas
Philosophy, General Works
Philosophy, Introductions and Anthologies
Professional Areas
Social and Political Philosophy
Social Sciences
Teaching Philosophy
coarse
medium
fine
A priori knowledge: yes or no?
Accept or lean toward: yes
1238 / 1803 (68.7%)
Accept or lean toward: no
389 / 1803 (21.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer
66 / 1803 (3.7%)
Agnostic/undecided
30 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept an intermediate view
24 / 1803 (1.3%)
Accept another alternative
14 / 1803 (0.8%)
Skip
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept both
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Reject both
4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Other
3 / 1803 (0.2%)
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?
Accept or lean toward: nominalism
736 / 1803 (40.8%)
Accept or lean toward: Platonism
655 / 1803 (36.3%)
Agnostic/undecided
87 / 1803 (4.8%)
Accept another alternative
81 / 1803 (4.5%)
Reject both
61 / 1803 (3.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
54 / 1803 (3.0%)
Accept an intermediate view
51 / 1803 (2.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer
32 / 1803 (1.8%)
Skip
19 / 1803 (1.1%)
There is no fact of the matter
16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Other
7 / 1803 (0.4%)
Accept both
4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?
Accept or lean toward: objective
730 / 1803 (40.5%)
Accept or lean toward: subjective
653 / 1803 (36.2%)
Accept an intermediate view
121 / 1803 (6.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer
63 / 1803 (3.5%)
Accept both
59 / 1803 (3.3%)
Agnostic/undecided
51 / 1803 (2.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
43 / 1803 (2.4%)
Accept another alternative
42 / 1803 (2.3%)
Skip
17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Reject both
14 / 1803 (0.8%)
There is no fact of the matter
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?
Accept or lean toward: yes
1115 / 1803 (61.8%)
Accept or lean toward: no
517 / 1803 (28.7%)
Agnostic/undecided
39 / 1803 (2.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer
36 / 1803 (2.0%)
Accept an intermediate view
24 / 1803 (1.3%)
Skip
21 / 1803 (1.2%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept both
9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Reject both
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other
4 / 1803 (0.2%)
There is no fact of the matter
3 / 1803 (0.2%)
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?
Accept or lean toward: externalism
788 / 1803 (43.7%)
Accept or lean toward: internalism
472 / 1803 (26.2%)
Accept an intermediate view
124 / 1803 (6.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
107 / 1803 (5.9%)
Agnostic/undecided
83 / 1803 (4.6%)
Accept both
83 / 1803 (4.6%)
Skip
37 / 1803 (2.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer
36 / 1803 (2.0%)
Accept another alternative
33 / 1803 (1.8%)
Reject both
23 / 1803 (1.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
11 / 1803 (0.6%)
Other
6 / 1803 (0.3%)
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?
Accept or lean toward: non-skeptical realism
1382 / 1803 (76.7%)
Accept or lean toward: skepticism
128 / 1803 (7.1%)
Accept or lean toward: idealism
123 / 1803 (6.8%)
Accept another alternative
41 / 1803 (2.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer
31 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept an intermediate view
26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Reject all
20 / 1803 (1.1%)
Skip
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter
8 / 1803 (0.4%)
Agnostic/undecided
8 / 1803 (0.4%)
Accept more than one
6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Reject one, undecided between others
6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?
Accept or lean toward: compatibilism
1004 / 1803 (55.7%)
Accept or lean toward: libertarianism
301 / 1803 (16.7%)
Accept or lean toward: no free will
233 / 1803 (12.9%)
Agnostic/undecided
65 / 1803 (3.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer
40 / 1803 (2.2%)
Accept another alternative
33 / 1803 (1.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
32 / 1803 (1.8%)
Accept an intermediate view
21 / 1803 (1.2%)
Reject all
18 / 1803 (1.0%)
Reject one, undecided between others
17 / 1803 (0.9%)
There is no fact of the matter
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept more than one
9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Skip
9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Other
8 / 1803 (0.4%)
God: theism or atheism?
Accept or lean toward: atheism
1257 / 1803 (69.7%)
Accept or lean toward: theism
295 / 1803 (16.4%)
Agnostic/undecided
117 / 1803 (6.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer
30 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept another alternative
28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Reject both
26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Skip
14 / 1803 (0.8%)
Accept an intermediate view
14 / 1803 (0.8%)
There is no fact of the matter
11 / 1803 (0.6%)
Other
9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Accept both
1 / 1803 (0.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
1 / 1803 (0.1%)
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?
Accept or lean toward: contextualism
749 / 1803 (41.5%)
Accept or lean toward: invariantism
528 / 1803 (29.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
163 / 1803 (9.0%)
Agnostic/undecided
95 / 1803 (5.3%)
Accept or lean toward: relativism
73 / 1803 (4.0%)
The question is too unclear to answer
36 / 1803 (2.0%)
Skip
35 / 1803 (1.9%)
Accept another alternative
26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Accept more than one
23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Reject one, undecided between others
23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Accept an intermediate view
19 / 1803 (1.1%)
There is no fact of the matter
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Reject all
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other
9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?
Accept or lean toward: empiricism
687 / 1803 (38.1%)
Accept or lean toward: rationalism
469 / 1803 (26.0%)
Accept an intermediate view
212 / 1803 (11.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer
134 / 1803 (7.4%)
Accept both
118 / 1803 (6.5%)
Reject both
63 / 1803 (3.5%)
Accept another alternative
55 / 1803 (3.1%)
Agnostic/undecided
28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
14 / 1803 (0.8%)
Skip
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter
6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other
4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?
Accept or lean toward: non-Humean
919 / 1803 (51.0%)
Accept or lean toward: Humean
521 / 1803 (28.9%)
Agnostic/undecided
120 / 1803 (6.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
119 / 1803 (6.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer
31 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept another alternative
26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Skip
26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Reject both
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept an intermediate view
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other
8 / 1803 (0.4%)
There is no fact of the matter
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Accept both
3 / 1803 (0.2%)
Logic: classical or non-classical?
Accept or lean toward: classical
874 / 1803 (48.5%)
Accept or lean toward: non-classical
320 / 1803 (17.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
232 / 1803 (12.9%)
Accept both
115 / 1803 (6.4%)
Agnostic/undecided
89 / 1803 (4.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer
58 / 1803 (3.2%)
There is no fact of the matter
39 / 1803 (2.2%)
Skip
36 / 1803 (2.0%)
Accept an intermediate view
16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative
15 / 1803 (0.8%)
Other
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Reject both
4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Mental content: internalism or externalism?
Accept or lean toward: externalism
882 / 1803 (48.9%)
Accept or lean toward: internalism
401 / 1803 (22.2%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
124 / 1803 (6.9%)
Agnostic/undecided
87 / 1803 (4.8%)
Accept an intermediate view
77 / 1803 (4.3%)
Accept both
76 / 1803 (4.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer
45 / 1803 (2.5%)
Skip
35 / 1803 (1.9%)
Accept another alternative
32 / 1803 (1.8%)
Reject both
23 / 1803 (1.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other
9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?
Accept or lean toward: moral realism
1017 / 1803 (56.4%)
Accept or lean toward: moral anti-realism
511 / 1803 (28.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
50 / 1803 (2.8%)
Agnostic/undecided
47 / 1803 (2.6%)
Accept an intermediate view
44 / 1803 (2.4%)
Accept another alternative
42 / 1803 (2.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer
38 / 1803 (2.1%)
Skip
23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Reject both
20 / 1803 (1.1%)
There is no fact of the matter
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other
4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Accept both
2 / 1803 (0.1%)
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?
Accept or lean toward: naturalism
912 / 1803 (50.6%)
Accept or lean toward: non-naturalism
474 / 1803 (26.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer
141 / 1803 (7.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
115 / 1803 (6.4%)
Agnostic/undecided
49 / 1803 (2.7%)
Skip
28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Accept an intermediate view
28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Reject both
17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative
17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept both
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter
7 / 1803 (0.4%)
Other
3 / 1803 (0.2%)
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?
Accept or lean toward: physicalism
981 / 1803 (54.4%)
Accept or lean toward: non-physicalism
521 / 1803 (28.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer
93 / 1803 (5.2%)
Accept an intermediate view
45 / 1803 (2.5%)
Agnostic/undecided
43 / 1803 (2.4%)
Accept another alternative
42 / 1803 (2.3%)
Reject both
25 / 1803 (1.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept both
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Skip
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter
8 / 1803 (0.4%)
Other
4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?
Accept or lean toward: cognitivism
1132 / 1803 (62.8%)
Accept or lean toward: non-cognitivism
340 / 1803 (18.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
97 / 1803 (5.4%)
Accept an intermediate view
72 / 1803 (4.0%)
Agnostic/undecided
39 / 1803 (2.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer
29 / 1803 (1.6%)
Accept another alternative
27 / 1803 (1.5%)
Accept both
26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Skip
25 / 1803 (1.4%)
Reject both
9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Other
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
2 / 1803 (0.1%)
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?
Accept or lean toward: internalism
654 / 1803 (36.3%)
Accept or lean toward: externalism
529 / 1803 (29.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
268 / 1803 (14.9%)
Agnostic/undecided
100 / 1803 (5.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer
67 / 1803 (3.7%)
Accept an intermediate view
57 / 1803 (3.2%)
Skip
43 / 1803 (2.4%)
Accept both
38 / 1803 (2.1%)
Reject both
22 / 1803 (1.2%)
Accept another alternative
17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Other
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
3 / 1803 (0.2%)
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
599 / 1803 (33.2%)
Accept or lean toward: two boxes
458 / 1803 (25.4%)
Accept or lean toward: one box
348 / 1803 (19.3%)
Agnostic/undecided
195 / 1803 (10.8%)
Skip
112 / 1803 (6.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer
31 / 1803 (1.7%)
There is no fact of the matter
25 / 1803 (1.4%)
Reject both
10 / 1803 (0.6%)
Other
10 / 1803 (0.6%)
Accept both
7 / 1803 (0.4%)
Accept another alternative
7 / 1803 (0.4%)
Accept an intermediate view
1 / 1803 (0.1%)
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?
Accept or lean toward: consequentialism
435 / 1803 (24.1%)
Accept or lean toward: virtue ethics
406 / 1803 (22.5%)
Accept or lean toward: deontology
404 / 1803 (22.4%)
Accept more than one
143 / 1803 (7.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
82 / 1803 (4.5%)
Agnostic/undecided
76 / 1803 (4.2%)
Accept another alternative
59 / 1803 (3.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
55 / 1803 (3.1%)
Reject all
50 / 1803 (2.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer
25 / 1803 (1.4%)
There is no fact of the matter
20 / 1803 (1.1%)
Skip
20 / 1803 (1.1%)
Reject one, undecided between others
17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Other
11 / 1803 (0.6%)
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?
Accept or lean toward: representationalism
523 / 1803 (29.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
303 / 1803 (16.8%)
Accept or lean toward: qualia theory
240 / 1803 (13.3%)
Accept or lean toward: disjunctivism
221 / 1803 (12.3%)
Agnostic/undecided
128 / 1803 (7.1%)
Accept or lean toward: sense-datum theory
79 / 1803 (4.4%)
Accept another alternative
60 / 1803 (3.3%)
Reject all
55 / 1803 (3.1%)
Skip
48 / 1803 (2.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer
39 / 1803 (2.2%)
Reject one or two, undecided between others
37 / 1803 (2.1%)
Accept more than one
34 / 1803 (1.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
19 / 1803 (1.1%)
Other
11 / 1803 (0.6%)
There is no fact of the matter
6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?
Accept or lean toward: psychological view
620 / 1803 (34.4%)
Accept or lean toward: biological view
325 / 1803 (18.0%)
Accept or lean toward: further-fact view
212 / 1803 (11.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
140 / 1803 (7.8%)
Agnostic/undecided
130 / 1803 (7.2%)
Accept another alternative
67 / 1803 (3.7%)
Accept more than one
61 / 1803 (3.4%)
There is no fact of the matter
58 / 1803 (3.2%)
Reject all
48 / 1803 (2.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer
45 / 1803 (2.5%)
Accept an intermediate view
41 / 1803 (2.3%)
Skip
30 / 1803 (1.7%)
Reject one, undecided between others
17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Other
9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?
Accept or lean toward: egalitarianism
595 / 1803 (33.0%)
Accept or lean toward: communitarianism
294 / 1803 (16.3%)
Accept or lean toward: libertarianism
242 / 1803 (13.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
187 / 1803 (10.4%)
Agnostic/undecided
84 / 1803 (4.7%)
Accept more than one
70 / 1803 (3.9%)
Accept another alternative
68 / 1803 (3.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer
67 / 1803 (3.7%)
Accept an intermediate view
59 / 1803 (3.3%)
Reject all
49 / 1803 (2.7%)
Skip
44 / 1803 (2.4%)
Reject one, undecided between others
27 / 1803 (1.5%)
Other
11 / 1803 (0.6%)
There is no fact of the matter
6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Proper names: Fregean or Millian?
Accept or lean toward: Millian
558 / 1803 (30.9%)
Accept or lean toward: Fregean
551 / 1803 (30.6%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
312 / 1803 (17.3%)
Agnostic/undecided
116 / 1803 (6.4%)
Accept another alternative
51 / 1803 (2.8%)
Accept an intermediate view
48 / 1803 (2.7%)
Skip
47 / 1803 (2.6%)
Reject both
42 / 1803 (2.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer
37 / 1803 (2.1%)
Accept both
16 / 1803 (0.9%)
There is no fact of the matter
15 / 1803 (0.8%)
Other
10 / 1803 (0.6%)
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?
Accept or lean toward: scientific realism
1264 / 1803 (70.1%)
Accept or lean toward: scientific anti-realism
287 / 1803 (15.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
55 / 1803 (3.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
51 / 1803 (2.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer
33 / 1803 (1.8%)
Agnostic/undecided
31 / 1803 (1.7%)
Reject both
28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Accept another alternative
26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Skip
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter
6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Accept both
5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other
4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?
Accept or lean toward: survival
626 / 1803 (34.7%)
Accept or lean toward: death
567 / 1803 (31.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
200 / 1803 (11.1%)
Agnostic/undecided
130 / 1803 (7.2%)
There is no fact of the matter
100 / 1803 (5.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer
69 / 1803 (3.8%)
Skip
52 / 1803 (2.9%)
Reject both
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept another alternative
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept an intermediate view
11 / 1803 (0.6%)
Accept both
10 / 1803 (0.6%)
Time: A-theory or B-theory?
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
626 / 1803 (34.7%)
Accept or lean toward: B-theory
408 / 1803 (22.6%)
Accept or lean toward: A-theory
288 / 1803 (16.0%)
Agnostic/undecided
176 / 1803 (9.8%)
Skip
103 / 1803 (5.7%)
Accept both
58 / 1803 (3.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer
42 / 1803 (2.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
27 / 1803 (1.5%)
Reject both
24 / 1803 (1.3%)
Accept another alternative
19 / 1803 (1.1%)
Accept an intermediate view
19 / 1803 (1.1%)
Other
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?
Accept or lean toward: switch
1191 / 1803 (66.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
131 / 1803 (7.3%)
Accept or lean toward: don't switch
130 / 1803 (7.2%)
Agnostic/undecided
99 / 1803 (5.5%)
There is no fact of the matter
64 / 1803 (3.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer
48 / 1803 (2.7%)
Skip
47 / 1803 (2.6%)
Reject both
31 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept another alternative
26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Other
16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept both
7 / 1803 (0.4%)
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?
Accept or lean toward: correspondence
882 / 1803 (48.9%)
Accept or lean toward: deflationary
415 / 1803 (23.0%)
Accept or lean toward: epistemic
196 / 1803 (10.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
59 / 1803 (3.3%)
Agnostic/undecided
58 / 1803 (3.2%)
Accept another alternative
40 / 1803 (2.2%)
Reject all
37 / 1803 (2.1%)
Accept more than one
29 / 1803 (1.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer
23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Skip
23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Reject one, undecided between others
16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other
7 / 1803 (0.4%)
There is no fact of the matter
6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?
Accept or lean toward: conceivable but not metaphysically possible
631 / 1803 (35.0%)
Accept or lean toward: metaphysically possible
434 / 1803 (24.1%)
Accept or lean toward: inconceivable
318 / 1803 (17.6%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
145 / 1803 (8.0%)
Agnostic/undecided
95 / 1803 (5.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer
64 / 1803 (3.5%)
There is no fact of the matter
32 / 1803 (1.8%)
Skip
30 / 1803 (1.7%)
Reject all
21 / 1803 (1.2%)
Other
16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative
9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Reject one, undecided between others
4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Accept an intermediate view
3 / 1803 (0.2%)
Accept more than one
1 / 1803 (0.1%)
Back to contents
loading ..