Sign in
|
Create an account
PhilPapers
PhilPeople
PhilArchive
PhilEvents
PhilJobs
Syntax
Advanced Search
New
All new items
Books
Journal articles
Manuscripts
Topics
All Categories
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Epistemology
Metaphilosophy
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Religion
M&E, Misc
Value Theory
Value Theory
Aesthetics
Applied Ethics
Meta-Ethics
Normative Ethics
Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
Philosophy of Law
Social and Political Philosophy
Value Theory, Miscellaneous
Science, Logic, and Mathematics
Science, Logic, and Mathematics
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Biology
Philosophy of Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Computing and Information
Philosophy of Mathematics
Philosophy of Physical Science
Philosophy of Social Science
Philosophy of Probability
General Philosophy of Science
Philosophy of Science, Misc
History of Western Philosophy
History of Western Philosophy
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
17th/18th Century Philosophy
19th Century Philosophy
20th Century Philosophy
History of Western Philosophy, Misc
Philosophical Traditions
Philosophical Traditions
African/Africana Philosophy
Asian Philosophy
Continental Philosophy
European Philosophy
Philosophy of the Americas
Philosophical Traditions, Miscellaneous
Philosophy, Misc
Philosophy, Misc
Philosophy, Introductions and Anthologies
Philosophy, General Works
Teaching Philosophy
Philosophy, Miscellaneous
Other Academic Areas
Other Academic Areas
Natural Sciences
Social Sciences
Cognitive Sciences
Formal Sciences
Arts and Humanities
Professional Areas
Other Academic Areas, Misc
Journals
Submit material
Submit a book or article
Upload a bibliography
Personal page tracking
Archives we track
Information for publishers
More
Introduction
Submitting to PhilPapers
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscriptions
Editor's Guide
The Categorization Project
For Publishers
For Archive Admins
Contact us
PhilPapers Surveys
API
Bargain Finder
About PhilPapers
Syntax
Advanced Search
Sign in
Create an account
The PhilPapers Surveys
Preliminary Survey results
(
Back to contents
)
Note: set response grain to "fine" for details on "other" responses.
Population
AOS
Response details
All respondents
Target faculty
Philosophy faculty or PhD
Philosophy faculty/PhD, non-target
Philosophy graduate student
Philosophy undergraduate
No philosophy affiliation listed
All respondents
17th/18th Century Philosophy
19th Century Philosophy
20th Century Philosophy
Aesthetics
African/Africana Philosophy
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
Applied Ethics
Arts and Humanities
Asian Philosophy
Cognitive Sciences
Continental Philosophy
Decision Theory
Epistemology
Formal Sciences
General Philosophy of Science
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
Meta-Ethics
Metaphilosophy
Metaphysics
Natural Sciences
Normative Ethics
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Biology
Philosophy of Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Computing and Information
Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Law
Philosophy of Mathematics
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Physical Science
Philosophy of Probability
Philosophy of Religion
Philosophy of Social Science
Philosophy of the Americas
Philosophy, General Works
Philosophy, Introductions and Anthologies
Professional Areas
Social and Political Philosophy
Social Sciences
Teaching Philosophy
coarse
medium
fine
A priori knowledge: yes or no?
Accept or lean toward: yes
662 / 931 (71.1%)
Accept or lean toward: no
171 / 931 (18.4%)
The question is too unclear to answer
43 / 931 (4.6%)
Agnostic/undecided
15 / 931 (1.6%)
Accept an intermediate view
11 / 931 (1.2%)
Accept another alternative
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
6 / 931 (0.6%)
Skip
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Accept both
4 / 931 (0.4%)
There is no fact of the matter
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Other
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Reject both
1 / 931 (0.1%)
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?
Accept or lean toward: Platonism
366 / 931 (39.3%)
Accept or lean toward: nominalism
351 / 931 (37.7%)
Agnostic/undecided
47 / 931 (5.0%)
Accept another alternative
46 / 931 (4.9%)
Reject both
34 / 931 (3.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
26 / 931 (2.8%)
Accept an intermediate view
21 / 931 (2.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer
19 / 931 (2.0%)
Skip
9 / 931 (1.0%)
There is no fact of the matter
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Other
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Accept both
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?
Accept or lean toward: objective
382 / 931 (41.0%)
Accept or lean toward: subjective
321 / 931 (34.5%)
Accept an intermediate view
61 / 931 (6.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer
42 / 931 (4.5%)
Agnostic/undecided
30 / 931 (3.2%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
29 / 931 (3.1%)
Accept another alternative
24 / 931 (2.6%)
Accept both
24 / 931 (2.6%)
Reject both
9 / 931 (1.0%)
Skip
4 / 931 (0.4%)
Other
3 / 931 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?
Accept or lean toward: yes
604 / 931 (64.9%)
Accept or lean toward: no
252 / 931 (27.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer
23 / 931 (2.5%)
Agnostic/undecided
18 / 931 (1.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
11 / 931 (1.2%)
Accept another alternative
6 / 931 (0.6%)
Skip
6 / 931 (0.6%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
4 / 931 (0.4%)
Accept both
3 / 931 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Other
1 / 931 (0.1%)
Reject both
1 / 931 (0.1%)
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?
Accept or lean toward: externalism
398 / 931 (42.7%)
Accept or lean toward: internalism
246 / 931 (26.4%)
Accept an intermediate view
64 / 931 (6.9%)
Agnostic/undecided
56 / 931 (6.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
44 / 931 (4.7%)
Accept both
43 / 931 (4.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer
28 / 931 (3.0%)
Accept another alternative
20 / 931 (2.1%)
Skip
15 / 931 (1.6%)
There is no fact of the matter
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Reject both
6 / 931 (0.6%)
Other
4 / 931 (0.4%)
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?
Accept or lean toward: non-skeptical realism
760 / 931 (81.6%)
Accept or lean toward: skepticism
45 / 931 (4.8%)
Accept or lean toward: idealism
40 / 931 (4.3%)
Accept another alternative
24 / 931 (2.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer
14 / 931 (1.5%)
Accept an intermediate view
12 / 931 (1.3%)
Reject all
11 / 931 (1.2%)
Skip
6 / 931 (0.6%)
There is no fact of the matter
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Other
4 / 931 (0.4%)
Agnostic/undecided
4 / 931 (0.4%)
Reject one, undecided between others
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Accept more than one
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?
Accept or lean toward: compatibilism
550 / 931 (59.1%)
Accept or lean toward: libertarianism
128 / 931 (13.7%)
Accept or lean toward: no free will
114 / 931 (12.2%)
Agnostic/undecided
38 / 931 (4.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer
26 / 931 (2.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
16 / 931 (1.7%)
Accept another alternative
16 / 931 (1.7%)
Accept an intermediate view
10 / 931 (1.1%)
Reject all
9 / 931 (1.0%)
There is no fact of the matter
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Reject one, undecided between others
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Accept more than one
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Skip
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Other
3 / 931 (0.3%)
God: theism or atheism?
Accept or lean toward: atheism
678 / 931 (72.8%)
Accept or lean toward: theism
136 / 931 (14.6%)
Agnostic/undecided
51 / 931 (5.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer
16 / 931 (1.7%)
Reject both
16 / 931 (1.7%)
Skip
9 / 931 (1.0%)
Accept another alternative
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Other
5 / 931 (0.5%)
There is no fact of the matter
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?
Accept or lean toward: contextualism
373 / 931 (40.1%)
Accept or lean toward: invariantism
290 / 931 (31.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
84 / 931 (9.0%)
Agnostic/undecided
53 / 931 (5.7%)
Accept or lean toward: relativism
27 / 931 (2.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer
23 / 931 (2.5%)
Reject one, undecided between others
18 / 931 (1.9%)
Skip
18 / 931 (1.9%)
Accept another alternative
12 / 931 (1.3%)
Accept an intermediate view
9 / 931 (1.0%)
Accept more than one
8 / 931 (0.9%)
There is no fact of the matter
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Reject all
6 / 931 (0.6%)
Other
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?
Accept or lean toward: empiricism
326 / 931 (35.0%)
Accept or lean toward: rationalism
259 / 931 (27.8%)
Accept an intermediate view
106 / 931 (11.4%)
The question is too unclear to answer
91 / 931 (9.8%)
Accept both
59 / 931 (6.3%)
Reject both
33 / 931 (3.5%)
Accept another alternative
25 / 931 (2.7%)
Agnostic/undecided
18 / 931 (1.9%)
Skip
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Other
2 / 931 (0.2%)
There is no fact of the matter
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?
Accept or lean toward: non-Humean
532 / 931 (57.1%)
Accept or lean toward: Humean
230 / 931 (24.7%)
Agnostic/undecided
60 / 931 (6.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
51 / 931 (5.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer
17 / 931 (1.8%)
Accept another alternative
11 / 931 (1.2%)
Skip
11 / 931 (1.2%)
Reject both
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Other
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Accept an intermediate view
4 / 931 (0.4%)
There is no fact of the matter
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Accept both
1 / 931 (0.1%)
Logic: classical or non-classical?
Accept or lean toward: classical
480 / 931 (51.6%)
Accept or lean toward: non-classical
143 / 931 (15.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
112 / 931 (12.0%)
Agnostic/undecided
52 / 931 (5.6%)
Accept both
48 / 931 (5.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer
32 / 931 (3.4%)
There is no fact of the matter
30 / 931 (3.2%)
Skip
13 / 931 (1.4%)
Accept another alternative
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Other
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Reject both
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Mental content: internalism or externalism?
Accept or lean toward: externalism
476 / 931 (51.1%)
Accept or lean toward: internalism
186 / 931 (20.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
53 / 931 (5.7%)
Agnostic/undecided
52 / 931 (5.6%)
Accept an intermediate view
41 / 931 (4.4%)
Accept both
36 / 931 (3.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer
28 / 931 (3.0%)
Accept another alternative
21 / 931 (2.3%)
Skip
15 / 931 (1.6%)
Reject both
13 / 931 (1.4%)
Other
6 / 931 (0.6%)
There is no fact of the matter
4 / 931 (0.4%)
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?
Accept or lean toward: moral realism
525 / 931 (56.4%)
Accept or lean toward: moral anti-realism
258 / 931 (27.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer
27 / 931 (2.9%)
Accept another alternative
25 / 931 (2.7%)
Agnostic/undecided
24 / 931 (2.6%)
Accept an intermediate view
23 / 931 (2.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
23 / 931 (2.5%)
Skip
10 / 931 (1.1%)
Reject both
9 / 931 (1.0%)
There is no fact of the matter
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Other
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Accept both
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?
Accept or lean toward: naturalism
464 / 931 (49.8%)
Accept or lean toward: non-naturalism
241 / 931 (25.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer
90 / 931 (9.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
63 / 931 (6.8%)
Agnostic/undecided
25 / 931 (2.7%)
Accept an intermediate view
12 / 931 (1.3%)
Skip
11 / 931 (1.2%)
Reject both
9 / 931 (1.0%)
Accept another alternative
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Accept both
4 / 931 (0.4%)
There is no fact of the matter
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Other
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?
Accept or lean toward: physicalism
526 / 931 (56.5%)
Accept or lean toward: non-physicalism
252 / 931 (27.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer
59 / 931 (6.3%)
Agnostic/undecided
23 / 931 (2.5%)
Accept an intermediate view
22 / 931 (2.4%)
Accept another alternative
18 / 931 (1.9%)
Reject both
12 / 931 (1.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Skip
4 / 931 (0.4%)
Accept both
3 / 931 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Other
1 / 931 (0.1%)
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?
Accept or lean toward: cognitivism
612 / 931 (65.7%)
Accept or lean toward: non-cognitivism
158 / 931 (17.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
44 / 931 (4.7%)
Accept an intermediate view
37 / 931 (4.0%)
Agnostic/undecided
20 / 931 (2.1%)
Accept another alternative
18 / 931 (1.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer
16 / 931 (1.7%)
Accept both
11 / 931 (1.2%)
Skip
10 / 931 (1.1%)
Other
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Reject both
2 / 931 (0.2%)
There is no fact of the matter
1 / 931 (0.1%)
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?
Accept or lean toward: internalism
325 / 931 (34.9%)
Accept or lean toward: externalism
277 / 931 (29.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
138 / 931 (14.8%)
Agnostic/undecided
56 / 931 (6.0%)
The question is too unclear to answer
45 / 931 (4.8%)
Accept an intermediate view
33 / 931 (3.5%)
Skip
20 / 931 (2.1%)
Accept both
17 / 931 (1.8%)
Reject both
9 / 931 (1.0%)
Accept another alternative
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Other
3 / 931 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
1 / 931 (0.1%)
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?
Accept or lean toward: two boxes
292 / 931 (31.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
219 / 931 (23.5%)
Accept or lean toward: one box
198 / 931 (21.3%)
Agnostic/undecided
124 / 931 (13.3%)
Skip
44 / 931 (4.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer
19 / 931 (2.0%)
There is no fact of the matter
15 / 931 (1.6%)
Accept another alternative
6 / 931 (0.6%)
Other
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Reject both
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Accept both
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Accept an intermediate view
1 / 931 (0.1%)
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?
Accept or lean toward: deontology
241 / 931 (25.9%)
Accept or lean toward: consequentialism
220 / 931 (23.6%)
Accept or lean toward: virtue ethics
169 / 931 (18.2%)
Accept more than one
78 / 931 (8.4%)
Agnostic/undecided
48 / 931 (5.2%)
Accept an intermediate view
37 / 931 (4.0%)
Accept another alternative
33 / 931 (3.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
31 / 931 (3.3%)
Reject all
25 / 931 (2.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer
17 / 931 (1.8%)
There is no fact of the matter
10 / 931 (1.1%)
Reject one, undecided between others
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Other
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Skip
6 / 931 (0.6%)
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?
Accept or lean toward: representationalism
293 / 931 (31.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
151 / 931 (16.2%)
Accept or lean toward: qualia theory
114 / 931 (12.2%)
Accept or lean toward: disjunctivism
102 / 931 (11.0%)
Agnostic/undecided
78 / 931 (8.4%)
Accept another alternative
36 / 931 (3.9%)
Reject all
31 / 931 (3.3%)
Accept or lean toward: sense-datum theory
29 / 931 (3.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer
24 / 931 (2.6%)
Reject one or two, undecided between others
21 / 931 (2.3%)
Skip
21 / 931 (2.3%)
Accept more than one
17 / 931 (1.8%)
Accept an intermediate view
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Other
5 / 931 (0.5%)
There is no fact of the matter
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?
Accept or lean toward: psychological view
313 / 931 (33.6%)
Accept or lean toward: biological view
157 / 931 (16.9%)
Accept or lean toward: further-fact view
114 / 931 (12.2%)
Agnostic/undecided
79 / 931 (8.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
58 / 931 (6.2%)
There is no fact of the matter
39 / 931 (4.2%)
Accept more than one
37 / 931 (4.0%)
Accept another alternative
36 / 931 (3.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer
26 / 931 (2.8%)
Accept an intermediate view
25 / 931 (2.7%)
Reject all
24 / 931 (2.6%)
Reject one, undecided between others
10 / 931 (1.1%)
Skip
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Other
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?
Accept or lean toward: egalitarianism
324 / 931 (34.8%)
Accept or lean toward: communitarianism
133 / 931 (14.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
100 / 931 (10.7%)
Accept or lean toward: libertarianism
92 / 931 (9.9%)
Agnostic/undecided
51 / 931 (5.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer
42 / 931 (4.5%)
Accept more than one
37 / 931 (4.0%)
Accept another alternative
37 / 931 (4.0%)
Accept an intermediate view
35 / 931 (3.8%)
Reject all
32 / 931 (3.4%)
Skip
19 / 931 (2.0%)
Reject one, undecided between others
17 / 931 (1.8%)
Other
7 / 931 (0.8%)
There is no fact of the matter
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Proper names: Fregean or Millian?
Accept or lean toward: Millian
321 / 931 (34.5%)
Accept or lean toward: Fregean
267 / 931 (28.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
128 / 931 (13.7%)
Agnostic/undecided
59 / 931 (6.3%)
Accept an intermediate view
39 / 931 (4.2%)
Accept another alternative
32 / 931 (3.4%)
The question is too unclear to answer
24 / 931 (2.6%)
Reject both
22 / 931 (2.4%)
Skip
14 / 931 (1.5%)
Accept both
10 / 931 (1.1%)
There is no fact of the matter
9 / 931 (1.0%)
Other
6 / 931 (0.6%)
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?
Accept or lean toward: scientific realism
699 / 931 (75.1%)
Accept or lean toward: scientific anti-realism
108 / 931 (11.6%)
Accept an intermediate view
30 / 931 (3.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer
23 / 931 (2.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
19 / 931 (2.0%)
Accept another alternative
15 / 931 (1.6%)
Reject both
15 / 931 (1.6%)
Agnostic/undecided
14 / 931 (1.5%)
Skip
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Other
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Accept both
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?
Accept or lean toward: survival
337 / 931 (36.2%)
Accept or lean toward: death
290 / 931 (31.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
86 / 931 (9.2%)
Agnostic/undecided
80 / 931 (8.6%)
There is no fact of the matter
56 / 931 (6.0%)
The question is too unclear to answer
34 / 931 (3.7%)
Skip
19 / 931 (2.0%)
Other
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Reject both
6 / 931 (0.6%)
Accept an intermediate view
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Accept both
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Time: A-theory or B-theory?
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
287 / 931 (30.8%)
Accept or lean toward: B-theory
245 / 931 (26.3%)
Accept or lean toward: A-theory
144 / 931 (15.5%)
Agnostic/undecided
98 / 931 (10.5%)
Skip
53 / 931 (5.7%)
Accept both
29 / 931 (3.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer
19 / 931 (2.0%)
There is no fact of the matter
17 / 931 (1.8%)
Accept another alternative
13 / 931 (1.4%)
Reject both
11 / 931 (1.2%)
Other
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
7 / 931 (0.8%)
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?
Accept or lean toward: switch
635 / 931 (68.2%)
Accept or lean toward: don't switch
71 / 931 (7.6%)
Agnostic/undecided
60 / 931 (6.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
42 / 931 (4.5%)
There is no fact of the matter
34 / 931 (3.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer
27 / 931 (2.9%)
Reject both
18 / 931 (1.9%)
Skip
15 / 931 (1.6%)
Accept another alternative
11 / 931 (1.2%)
Other
10 / 931 (1.1%)
Accept an intermediate view
4 / 931 (0.4%)
Accept both
4 / 931 (0.4%)
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?
Accept or lean toward: correspondence
473 / 931 (50.8%)
Accept or lean toward: deflationary
231 / 931 (24.8%)
Accept or lean toward: epistemic
64 / 931 (6.9%)
Agnostic/undecided
32 / 931 (3.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
28 / 931 (3.0%)
Reject all
23 / 931 (2.5%)
Accept another alternative
20 / 931 (2.1%)
Accept more than one
16 / 931 (1.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer
13 / 931 (1.4%)
Reject one, undecided between others
12 / 931 (1.3%)
Skip
8 / 931 (0.9%)
Accept an intermediate view
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Other
4 / 931 (0.4%)
There is no fact of the matter
2 / 931 (0.2%)
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?
Accept or lean toward: conceivable but not metaphysically possible
331 / 931 (35.6%)
Accept or lean toward: metaphysically possible
217 / 931 (23.3%)
Accept or lean toward: inconceivable
149 / 931 (16.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue
84 / 931 (9.0%)
Agnostic/undecided
61 / 931 (6.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer
40 / 931 (4.3%)
There is no fact of the matter
12 / 931 (1.3%)
Skip
10 / 931 (1.1%)
Reject all
10 / 931 (1.1%)
Other
9 / 931 (1.0%)
Accept another alternative
5 / 931 (0.5%)
Reject one, undecided between others
3 / 931 (0.3%)
Back to contents
loading ..