Defending The Open Future: Replies to MacFarlane, Green, Wasserman, and Bigg & Miller

Analytic Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to John MacFarlane, Mitchell Green, Ryan Wasserman, and Anthony Bigg and Kristie Miller) for a symposium on my book, _The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False_ (OUP, 2021) in *Analytic Philosophy*. [The contribution from MacFarlane is available on his website, those from Wasserman and Green are on their Academia profiles, and the contribution from Bigg and Miller is on Miller's PhilPapers profile.]

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the idea that all future tensed contingents are false.Anthony Bigg & Kristie Miller - 2024 - Analytic Philosophy 1.
On The Open Future: Replies to Rhoda and Rubio.Patrick Todd - forthcoming - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
Can truth relativism account for the indeterminacy of future contingents?Corine Besson & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-23.
A Note on Assertion, Relativism and Future Contingents.J. Adam Carter - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):139-144.
Our Naïve Representation of Time and of the Open Future.Batoul Hodroj, Andrew J. Latham & Kristie Miller - forthcoming - Dialectica.
The Open Future.Stephan Torre - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (5):360-373.
The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False, by Patrick Todd. [REVIEW]Aldo Frigerio - 2023 - Manuscrito 46 (1):220-230.
Future contingency, future indeterminacy, and grounding: comments on Todd: Book symposium: Patrick Todd, The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. 224 pp. $80.00. [REVIEW]Alan R. Rhoda - 2024 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 95 (1):103-109.
Future contingents, Supervaluationism, and relative truth.Roberto Ciuni & Carlo Proietti - unknown
The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All False.Patrick Todd - 2021 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Attesting the Aristotelian Future.Michael J. Raven - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (4):751-757.
The Truth About the Past and the Future.Ned Markosian - 2013 - In Fabrice Correia & Andrea Iacona (eds.), Around the Tree: Semantic and Metaphysical Issues Concerning Branching Time and the Open Future. Springer. pp. 127-141.
Critical Notice: The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All False, by Patrick Todd. [REVIEW]Stephan Torre - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (3):1036-1043.
Patrick Todd, The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. [REVIEW]Elijah Hess - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (4):294-297.
On behalf of a mutable future.Patrick Todd - 2016 - Synthese 193 (7):2077-2095.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-30

Downloads
242 (#85,937)

6 months
132 (#29,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Todd
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1996 - New York: Routledge.
Précis of Objects and Persons.Trenton Merricks - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):700-703.
Conditionals.Angelika Kratzer - 1986 - Chicago Linguistics Society 22 (2):1–15.

View all 28 references / Add more references