The Open Future

Philosophy Compass 6 (5):360-373 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A commonly held idea regarding the nature of time is that the future is open and the past is fixed or closed. This article investigates the notion that there is an asymmetry in openness between the past and the future. The following questions are considered: How exactly is this asymmetry in openness to be understood? What is the relation between an open future and various ontological views about the future? Is an open future a branching future? What is the relation between an open future and the question of whether contingent statements about the future are true or false? Is an open future compatible with a single determinate future?

Similar books and articles

Probability and the Open Future View.Alexander R. Pruss - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):190-196.
Past, present, future, and special relativity.Nataša Rakić - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):257-280.
The philosophical case for open theism.Alan Rhoda - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):301-311.
The open past.Ned Markosian - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 79 (1):95 - 105.
Back to the open future.Elizabeth Barnes & Ross P. Cameron - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):1-26.
On relativity theory and openness of the future.Nicholas Maxwell - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):341-348.
The Liberal Arts and Commensurability.Charles Tedder - 2010 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):80-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-23

Downloads
898 (#16,656)

6 months
149 (#23,984)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephan Torre
University of Aberdeen

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Philosophical papers.David Kellogg Lewis - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Four Dimensionalism.Theodore Sider - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.

View all 54 references / Add more references