Response to Stephen Houlgate

The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):175-188 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a response to issues raised by Stephen Houlgate in his article “Hegel, Desmond, and the Problem of God’s Transcendence,” dealing with Hegel’s God: A Counterfeit Double? The response focuses especially on the hermeneutical finesse we need in reading Hegel on religion, on the nature of “release” in Hegel, on the need for an agapeic God, and on the differences between Hegel’s speculative philosophy and Desmond’s metaxological approach to the practice of philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Peter Hodgson.William Desmond - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):189-200.
Response to Martin De Nys.William Desmond - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):165-174.
Response to Stephen Houlgate.John McDowell - 2009 - The Owl of Minerva 41 (1/2):27-38.
Hegel’s God.Peter C. Hodgson - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):153-163.
Hegel's theory of tragedy.Stephen Houlgate - 2007 - In Hegel and the Arts. Northwestern University Press.
Hegel on the beauty of sculpture.Stephen Houlgate - 2007 - In Hegel and the Arts. Northwestern University Press.
Action, right and morality in Hegel's Philosophy of right.Stephen Houlgate - 2010 - In Arto Laitinen & Constantine Sandis (eds.), Hegel on action. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
106 (#167,207)

6 months
16 (#163,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Will D. Desmond
Maynooth University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references