Báñez frente a Suárez acerca de la libertad

Bajo Palabra. Revista de Filosofía 25:179-199 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On several occasions, Báñez considered Suárez the main supporter of the Molinist doctrine along with Molina himself. According to Báñez, the main mistake of Molinism is its misunderstanding of freedom. This led him to refine his personal Thomistic theory of freedom. Free will is radically in the intellect and formally in the will. Intellect is the root of freedom because the most important indifference is found in the object, whose connection with the end is understood as not necessary. The intellect aware of this indifference causes a formally free volition that is not incompatible with the effective divine motion.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Suárez y la premoción física.David Torrijos Castrillejo - 2017 - Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 44:71-94.
Was Báñez a Bañecian?David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2020 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):431-458.
Leibniz on God’s Knowledge of Counterfactuals.Michael V. Griffin - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (3):317-343.
La polémica de auxiliis y la Apología de Bañez.Juan Hevia Echevarría - 2003 - El Catoblepas: Revista Crítica Del Presente.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-14

Downloads
239 (#86,039)

6 months
81 (#61,109)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Torrijos-Castrillejo
Universidad Eclesiástica San Dámaso

References found in this work

Was Báñez a Bañecian?David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2020 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):431-458.

Add more references